Beebe Retirement Center, Inc.

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 77.8 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-09-05 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing in accordance with the facility assessment on 24 of 66 shifts reviewed from 08/10/2025 to 09/01/2025, to ensure required care for was provided. The findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, which was updated on 09/30/2024, indicated the facility's average census was 81 residents with 13 short term residents, 14 residents in the secure memory care unit, with the remainder the census and required staffing at the following ratio to meet the resident's needs: Day Shift (7am to 3 pm): 1 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) per 7 residents and 2 licensed nurses and a Medication Assistant Certified. (MA-C) Evening Shift (3 pm to 11 pm):1 CNA per 9 residents, 2 Licensed Practical nurse and a MA-C. Night Shift (11 pm to 7nam) :1 CNA per 13 residents and 2 licensed nurses. With an average daily census of 82 the facility would require 12 CNAs on day shift, 9 CNAs on evening shift and 6 CNAs on night shift. Review of the staffing sheets…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, interview and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure to ensure no expired medications were given to residents in two of three medication carts observed for expired medications. The findings include: During an observation on 09/04/2025 at 9:15 AM, this surveyor observed four opened multi-use Lantus insulin pens, one opened Basaglar multi-use insulin pen and one opened Degludec insulin pen, were observed in the top drawer of the medication cart used for 400, 500, and 600 halls. There was no indication of an opened date on the insulin pens. During an interview on 09/04/2025 at 9:17 AM, LPN #10 confirmed it was important to write the date opened on insulin to prevent giving expired medication to the residents. Review of a facility policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage indicated opened medication vials are dated and used or discarded after 28 days unless manufactures indicate a shorter or longer date.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to accurately complete assessments for 2 (Residents #42 and #59) residents reviewed for accurate completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS). Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Resident Assessment Instrument, revised September 2010, indicated, .1. The Interdisciplinary Assessment Team must use the MDS form currently mandated by Federal and State regulations to conduct the resident assessment. Other assessment forms may be used in addition to the MDS form. 2. The purpose of the assessment is to describe the resident's capability to perform life functions and to identify significant impairments in functional capacity. 3. Information derived from the comprehensive assessment helps the staff to plan care that allows the resident to reach his/her highest practicable level of functioning . 1. A review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #42 with a diagnosis of presence of cerebrospinal fluid drainage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who want to self-administrate medications were properly assessed and deemed appropriate to do so for 1 (Resident #6) resident reviewed for self-administration of medications. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications, revised December 2016, indicated, Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so .2. In addition to general evaluation of decision-making capacity, the staff and practitioner will perform a more specific skill assessment . A review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #6 with a diagnosis of cognitive communication deficit. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/04/2024 revealed Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene before, during, and after medication pass for 2 (Resident #6 and #132) residents and failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were being followed for a resident with a feeding tube for 1 (Resident #59) of 1 resident reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. The findings are: 1. A review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #59 with gastrostomy status (placement of a feeding tube). a. The quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/29/2024 revealed Resident #59 had a feeding tube and received a mechanically altered diet and a therapeutic diet. b. A review of the Care Plan revealed Resident #59 requires enhanced barrier precautions related to peg tube status. (Initiated 04/11/2024). Interventions include: 1) Alcohol based hand-rub or wash with soap and water if visibly soiled before and after leaving the room. 2) Follow facility policies and procedures for cleaning and disinfection…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-27 · tag F0637 — pattern
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment within 14 days of the facility determining there had been a significant change for 2 Rresidents (Resident #1 and #2) of sampled Residents who received Hospice Care. The findings are: Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 6/12/23 showed the Resident received hospice. Review of Resident #1's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 5/31/23 to consult hospice for an evaluation and admit if appropriate. Review of Resident #1's care plan with an initiated date of 5/31/23 showed receiving hospice care related to a terminal diagnosis. Review of the Census list in the Electronic Record showed Resident #1's payor source changed on 6/26/23 from Hospice Private to Private Pay. Review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 5/19/23 showed no documentation of hospice care while a resident. Review of Resident #2's Significant Change in Status MDS with an ARD of 8/19/23 showed in process. Review of Resident #2's MDS Section of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff available to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promotes each residents' rights, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This failed practice had the potential to affect all 82 residents in the facility. The findings are: Review of the facility's The PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) QuickBase staffing report showed the following: a. July 2023 Did not meet the standard for staffing. Reportable hours were 7679.26 in thirty one calendar days in the month, and the July minimum direct care hours needed based on daily average census was 8282.80. The difference between actual and required minimum for month was -0.24. b. August 2023 Did not meet the standard for staffing. Reportable hours were 7855.77 in thirty-one calendar days in the month, and the August minimum direct care hours needed based on daily average census was 8296.34. The difference between actual and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-16 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected anticoagulant use for 5 (Residents #7, #8, #43, #51 and #55) of 5 sampled residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. The findings are: 1. Resident #7 had a diagnosis of Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery with Angina Pectoris with documented Spasm and Essential (Primary) Hypertension. The Quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/16/23 documented the resident received an anticoagulant medication all 7 days of the 7 day lookback period. a. A Physicians Order dated 02/06/23 documented, Aspirin Oral Tablet (Aspirin,) Give 81 mg [milligrams] by mouth one time a day . 2. Resident #8 had diagnoses of Heart Failure, Unspecified and Acute Myocardial Infarction, Unspecified. The Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 05/12/23 documented the resident received an anticoagulant medication all 7 days of the 7 day lookback period. a. A Physicians Order dated 05/05/23 documented, Clopidogrel Bisulfate Oral Tablet 75 MG (Clopidogrel…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn for a resident on contact isolation precautions for 1 (Resident #231) of 1 sampled resident who was on Contact Isolation. The findings are: 1. Resident #231 had a diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection, Site not Specified. a. The Nursing Admit/Readmit Assessment and Care Plan with a date of 06/06/23 revealed Resident #231 was admitted with an infection that required isolation. b. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of June 8, 2023, revealed Resident #231 is frequently incontinent. c. The Care Plan with a revision date of 06/13/23 documented, Continue isolation of resident following completion of antibiotic therapy and results of UA [urinary analysis] for post VRE [Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci] dx [diagnosis] . Continue in private room at this time . d. On 06/12/23 at 10:20 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 pushed Resident #231 in a wheelchair from Physical Therapy back to her room. The Surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-16 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed and deemed safe for self-administration of nebulizer (updraft) treatments for 2 (Residents #25 and #66) of 5 (Residents #20, #25, #31, #64 and #66) sampled residents who had Physician Orders for updraft treatments. This failed practice had the potential to affect 12 residents who had orders for updraft treatments as documented on a list provided by the Administrator on 06/15/23 at 9:00 AM. The findings are: 1. Resident #25 had diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Unspecified and Emphysema, Unspecified. a. A Care Plan with an initiated date of 8/19/22 revealed Resident #25 has chronic Emphysema/COPD with an intervention to give aerosol or bronchodilators as ordered. The care plan does not mention the resident has been evaluated to self-administer aerosol or bronchodilator treatments. b. Physician Orders dated 09/26/22 documented, Ipratropium-Albuterol Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) MG [milligrams]/3ML [milliliter] 3 ml inhale orally every 4 hours as needed for SOB…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR