Westwood Health And Rehab, INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 62.5 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 31% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-01-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive person-centered care plan included an objective for monitoring a resident with wandering behaviors who was at risk for resident-to-resident altercations for 1 (Resident #44) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. The lack of effective interventions resulted in Resident #44 having resident-to-resident abuse that occurred on 04/11/2024, 04/19/2024, 07/10/2024, 08/06/2024, 08/12/2024, 12/07/2024, 12/20/2024, 12/25/2024, and 01/09/2025. All of the incidents took place on the locked unit and Resident #44 had been kicked, hit in the face, hit in an unknown area, pushed, punched in the hand, struck in the hand, punched in the stomach, pushed down numerous times, and hit in the head. The last incident resulted in a broken hip. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-01-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from resident-to-resident abuse for 1 (Resident #44) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The lack of effective behavior monitoring resulted in Resident #44 having resident to resident abuse that occurred on 04/11/2024, 04/19/2024, 07/10/2024, 08/06/2024, 08/12/2024, 12/07/2024, 12/20/2024, 12/25/2024, and 01/09/2025. Of those incidents, Resident #9 was the physical aggressor for 3 instances. On 12/07/2024, Resident #9 hit Resident #44 in the stomach. On 12/20/24, Resident #9 pushed resident #44, resulting in the resident falling. On 01/08/2025, Resident #9 pushed Resident #44, resulting in the resident falling. Resident #44 was sent to the emergency room and was found to have a fractured hip. All of the other incidents were completed by other residents on the locked unit and Resident #44 had been kicked, hit in the face, hit in an unknown area, pushed, punched in the hand, struck in the hand, and hit in the head. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident to resident events were reported within 24 hours even if no serious bodily injury occurred for 1 (Resident #9) of three residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Findings include: A review of the facility policy, Abuse Prevention, revised 11/16/2017 revealed that all reports of resident abuse, neglect, injuries of an unknown source, resident-to-resident abuse and resident-to-staff abuse are promptly and thoroughly investigated by facility management, and that when an alleged or suspected abuse is reported, the facility administrator or his/her designee, would notify the following: 1. The State licensing/certification agency 2. The resident ' s representative 3. Law enforcement 4. The resident ' s attending physician. A review of OLTC Incident and Accident Report (I&A) indicated on 01/08/2025, Resident #9 pushed Resident #44 into a wall. Resident #44 grabbed at their hip as if the resident was in pain. Both residents resided in the Alzheimer ' s unit. Resident #44 had a hip…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident received prompt treatment after noticing a change in condition for 1 (Resident #112) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse and/or neglect. Specifically, Resident #112 showed signs of a stroke and was not sent to the emergency room until approximately 4 hours after noticing the change in condition. The findings are: A review of an admission Record indicated Resident #112 had diagnoses of neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, altered mental status, atrial fibrillation (irregular and often rapid heart rhythm that can lead to stroke), cerebrovascular disease (term for conditions that affect blood flow to your brain), cognitive communication deficit. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/04/2025 documented the resident scored 00, (0-7 indicates the resident was severely cognitively impaired) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to (1) properly transfer 1 (Resident #41) of 9 residents reviewed for accidents; (2) ensure keys were not left in the janitor closet door unattended where chemicals were stored for 1 (100 hall) of 4 halls observed; (3) ensure the rear casters/wheels of the mechanical lift were in the unlocked position when raising and lowering residents affecting 1 (Resident #8) of 9 residents reviewed for accidents; (4) ensure the beauty shop on the secured unit was locked when not in use or when there were no staff present. The findings are: 1. A review of an Order Summary Report revealed Resident #41 had a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (paralysis after a stroke) affecting the dominant side. The quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/23/2024 revealed Resident #41 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Further review indicated the resident had upper and lower extremity range…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-31 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse was disposed of properly for one of one dumpster observed. The findings are: During an observation on 01/28/2025 at 3:00 PM, the trash dumpster gates were opened, exposing the trash dumpster and the trash inside. Sitting directly next to the dumpster was a used recliner and broken wooden fencing. A. The trash dumpster door was left open, exposing trash bags containing briefs, gloves, and other waste items inside. B. The fence around the dumpster had a large section of the fence missing, exposing a large black trash bag lying on the ground beside the dumpster that contained unknown debris and a dirty recliner sitting beside the dumpster. The black trash bag was torn open in several places. Items that had spilled out of the black trash bag included an empty sugar bag, several foam containers, plastic lids, a stack of white cups, plastic bags, used plastic gloves and an empty bottle of thickened water. [NAME] bags, used gloves, paper and other debris were on the grounds around the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during one of one meal service observed. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, revised October 2023, indicated, handwashing was the primary means to prevent the spread of infections and stated that hand hygiene is indicated immediately before touching a resident, after contact with contaminated surfaces and after touching a resident or the resident ' s environment. During an observation on 01/27/2025 at 12:38 PM, Nursing Assistant (NA) #9 rubbed their hands on their shirt, then placed their hands in their lap, then picked up a spoon and started feeding a resident without sanitizing hands. After feeding the bite, NA #9 placed their hands back in between their knees, then grabbed a spoon to feed the resident, without sanitizing hands. NA #9 reached across another second resident and adjusted the resident, then picked up a glass and offered the first resident a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-31 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to acquire a current Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA) certificate appropriate for the level of testing performed within the facility, as required, for 1 of 1 facility. The findings are: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Guidance at tag F770 documented, .If a facility provides its own laboratory services or performs any laboratory tests directly (e.g. [for example], blood glucose monitoring, etc. [et cetera]) the provisions of 42 CFR [Code of Federal Regulations] Part 493 apply and the facility must have a current Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA) certificate appropriate for the level of testing performed within the facility. On 1/29/25 at 11:52 a.m., Observation of the facility's CLIA certificate documented an expiration date of 1/25/25. The Administrator was asked if the facility had a current CLIA certificate in her office. She stated, I will have to get that for you. A review of Pay.gov Payment Confirmation: CLIA Laboratory Program indicated the facility paid for the CLIA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #13) of 1 sampled resident was provided a weighted cup for fluids to prevent dehydration. The findings are: Resident #13 had a diagnosis of covid 19 and unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition. The Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/26/24 documented the resident scored 07 (00-07 indicates severely cognitively impaired) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). A Care Plan dated 10/23/23 documented, .Weighted Cups .Encourage good nutrition and hydration in order to promote healthier skin . On 1/22/24 at 2:42 PM, Resident #13 had a pitcher and a styrofoam cup in his room. Both were empty. On 1/24/24 at 2:56 PM, Resident #13 was in bed drinking liquid out of a white styrofoam cup. On 1/25/24 at 9:36 AM, there were no drinking cups in Resident #13's room. On 1/25/24 at 9:45 AM, the Activity Director walked into Resident #13's room. She was asked, Does [Resident #13] have any water or a weighted cup in his room. She stated, No, he doesn't. On 1/25/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0575 — pattern
  Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to post, in a form and manner accessible and understandable to residents, contact information for pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups for 15 residents residing in the facility's Secure Unit. The findings are: On 01/22/2024 at 02:40 PM, observed the contact information for State agencies and the Ombudsman was not posted in the secure unit. The doorways into the secure unit were closed and secured to prevent residents from exiting and observing contact information posted in other parts of the facility. On 01/23/2024 at 08:30 AM, observed the contact information for State agencies and the Ombudsman was not posted in the secure unit. On 01/24/2024 at 08:00 AM, observed the contact information for State agencies and the Ombudsman was not posted in the secure unit. On 01/24/2024 at 01:35 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported they were not aware that the contact information for State agencies and the Ombudsman was required to be posted in the secure unit. The DON confirmed that the contact information…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the resident rooms in a safe, functional, homelike manner for 3 (Rooms 114, 119, 121) rooms, as evidenced by trim disconnected from the walls and built in drawers failed to open and close safely. The findings are: On 01/24/24 at 10:08 AM, during environmental rounds the following observations were made: a. Standing in the entrance of room [ROOM NUMBER], inside the bathroom, on the left side of the floor, the trim was disconnected from the wall 2 inches. b. Standing in the entrance of room [ROOM NUMBER], the lower section of the built in 2-door closet had upper and lower drawers. The upper drawer toward the outside window could not be opened and safely closed. c. Standing in the entrance of room [ROOM NUMBER], the lower section of the built in 2-door closet had upper and lower drawers. The upper and lower drawers toward the bathroom could not be opened and safely closed. In addition, the floor trim on the wall from the bathroom…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure fingernails were cleaned and groomed to promote good personal hygiene and grooming for 2 (Residents #32 and #34) of 15 (Residents #2, #3, #4, #8, #13, #21, #31, #32, #35, #38, #43, #45, #48, #105, and #106) sampled residents who were dependent on staff for fingernail care and facial hair was removed from 1 (Resident #105) of 10 (Residents #50, #105, #13, #45, #35, #41, #32, #38, #5, and #8) sampled residents who were dependent on staff for personal hygiene. The findings are: 1. Resident #32 had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/02/23 documented the resident scored 06 (0-07 indicates severely cognitively impaired) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and required partial/moderate assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). The Comprehensive Care Plan with a revision date of 12/23/23 included the need for assistance with ADLs with an intervention noted Resident #32 was able to perform personal hygiene…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,871 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,871 — penalty dated 2025-01-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR