No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ridgecrest Health And Rehabilitation

5504 E Johnson Ave, Jonesboro, AR 72401 · For profit - Corporation · 135 certified beds · (870) 932-3271 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (870) 932-3271 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0567)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 29% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4901 E Johnson Ave · (870) 936-7695 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4109 E Johnson Ave · (870) 910-5550 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3605 E Johnson Ave · (870) 910-0225 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5036 Highway 49 N · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4901 E Johnson Ave · (870) 932-8222

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.5%9.5%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.3%4.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.2%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.3%1.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.9%10.1%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.9%21.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.8%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%4.2%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.1%13.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.8%10.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine38.1%77.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.5%24.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.4%12.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.052.011.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.652.131.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 235 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
75.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 75.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 101 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.4%CMS range 46.4–61.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.8%CMS range 9.8–16.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge75.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge67.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge90.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.9%CMS range 5.1–11.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.051.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
0.84
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.74
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.94
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
67.1%
Total nursing turnover
76.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 110.0 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.74 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

0
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-12)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-02)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined the facility failed to administer medications within the recommended time frame for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 (Resident # 1, Resident #3, and Resident #4) sampled residents. The findings are: The quarterly Minimum data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan revised on 05/09/2023, revealed the resident received pain medication. Interventions included administering analgesic medications as ordered by physicians. On 10/29/24 at 9:27 AM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 indicated she was passing morning medications late because she's had 17,000 things happen. She indicated the medications should have been passed by 9:00 AM. On 10/29/24 at 11:10 AM, LPN #1 was observed pulling medications for Resident #3. On 10/29/24 at 11:19 AM, LPN #1 had medications in a medication cup on top of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to not administer medications that were pulled by another nurse for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 (Resident # 1, Resident #3, and Resident #4) sampled resident. The findings are: The quarterly Minimum data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan revised on 05/09/2023, revealed the resident received pain medication. Interventions included administering analgesic medications as ordered by physician. On 10/29/24 at 11:10 AM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 was observed pulling medications for Resident #3. On 10/29/24 at 11:19 AM, LPN #1 had medications in a medication cup on top of the medication cart. The Medicare Manager walked up to the medication cart and asked LPN #1 who the medications in the cup belonged to. LPN #1 informed the Medicare Manager that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff practiced good hand washing to prevent potential cross contamination for the residents who received meal trays from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 103 residents who received meals from the kitchen (Total Census: 105), as documented on a list provided by the Dietary Manager on 7/31/2024. The findings are: 1. On 07/30/24 at 3:15 PM, Dietary aide (DA) #5 picked up tray cards and packets of condiments and placed them in the trays, contaminating her hands. Without washing her hands, she picked up clean glasses by their rims and placed them on the trays to be used in serving lunch beverages to the residents. At 4:28 PM, the surveyor asked DA #5 what he should you have done after touching dirty. objects and before handling clean equipment. He stated, Washed my hands. 2. On 07/30/24 at 3:44 PM, DA #5 turned on the hand washing sink faucet and washed her hands. After washing her hands, she pulled out tissue papers and dried her hands. After drying her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained while performing Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for 2 (Resident # 22 and # 66) of two residents receiving personal care. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure curtains were pulled to provide privacy, and that soiled items were not passed over a resident's face during incontinence care. Finding included: 1. Review of a facility policy titled Dignity, dated February 2021, indicated, Residents are to be treated with dignity and respect at all times .Staff promote, maintain and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures .Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are [is] prohibited. Review of an admission Record indicated Resident # 22 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of acute and chronic respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with exacerbation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-02 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) for two (Resident #36 and #103) sample mix residents. The findings are: 1. On 08/01/24 at 3:35 PM, MDS Nurse #20 was asked to confirm if Resident #36 was receiving an antipsychotic. MDS Nurse #20 reviewed the record and identified an order for Olanzapine, and confirmed this medication was an antipsychotic. When asked to review the latest MDS, MDS Coordinator #20 reported that they probably overlooked the medication or simply miscoded the document. When asked if an antipsychotic should be coded on the MDS, MDS Nurse #20 affirmed that the medication should have been identified. 2. Review of Resident #103's admission Record, dated 05/23/2024, revealed a diagnosis of sleep apnea. a. On 07/29/24 at 10:29 AM, the Surveyor observed a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) mask at Resident #103's bedside with CPAP mask sitting on bedside table not in a bag. Resident #103 stated, I have sleep apnea. b. Review of Resident #103's Order Summary Report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-02 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that base line care planning completed with interventions upon admission for pressure ulcers, enhanced barrier precautions, and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) lines for 4 residents out of the sample residents (Resident #363, #366, #367, and #371). A review of the Order Summary reveals that Resident #363 had diagnosis of malnutrition, and pressure ulcer at an unspecified site and an unspecified stage. A review of the Order Summary reveals that Resident #363 had an order for Treatment to unstageable pressure injury to coccyx: cleanse with wound cleanser or sterile water. Apply thin layer of [named brand of burn gel] cover with calcium alginate. Cover with 6 X 6 border foam daily and PRN until resolved. Every day shift for wound treatment may substitute as necessary. Reassess in 14 days. Start Date 7/23/2024 A review of the Order Summary reveals that Resident #363 had an order entered for Enhanced Barrier Precautions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with activities of daily living were regularly provided with the necessary assistance to maintain good hygiene and grooming, as evidenced by failure to ensure fingernails were kept clean and trimmed for one out of one sampled resident. (Resident #71); to ensure proper Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) was provided for 1 (Resident #22) of 1 sampled resident who were dependent on staff for ADLs. The findings are: 1. A review of the Order Summary revealed that Resident #71 had diagnoses of Type II diabetes mellitus, kidney failure, and a need for assistance with personal care. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/13/2024 reveals that Resident #71 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 (severe cognitive impairment). A review of section GG reveals that Resident #71 is coded as independent for eating, substantial/maximal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to set up wound assessment upon admission to ensure healing and improvement of wounds for 4 out of the sample residents (Resident #363, #366, #367, and #371); failed to follow physician orders for a scheduled wound care treatment for 1 (Resident #367) of 1 resident reviewed for wound care treatment. The findings are: 1. A review of a facility policy titled, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy, dated February, indicated, Clean wound according to facility protocol, or as ordered. A review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #367 with diagnoses that included partial traumatic amputation of right foot. A review of Order Summary Report, revealed Resident #367 had an order for wound vac change every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and as needed. Continuous high suction at 125 millimeters of mercury with foam. During an observation on 07/31/2024 at 1:41 PM, Surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #14 prepare a cup of 4 x 4 gauze and wet it with Dankins Solution half strength. LPN # 14 placed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility document review, it is determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff had the competencies and skills to provide care and respond to individualized needs as identified in baseline care plan, comprehensive care plan and care plan revision, setting up enhance barrier precautions for wound care, Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tubes, Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) lines, contact isolation, wound care assessments, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and medication administration specifically the facility: 1. Failed to ensure that base line care plan, comprehensive care plan, and revision of care plan was completed with interventions upon admission for pressure ulcers, enhanced barrier precautions, CPAP, Elopement, and PICC line for 7 residents out the sampled residents (Resident #363, #366, #367, #371, #103, #462) 2. Failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were utilized upon admission for 4 residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all pharmaceuticals were available for the residents during medication administration. The finding are: 1. Resident #31's admission Record dated 4/3/2024 noted a diagnoses of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), emphysema, wheezing, and chronic cough. a. Resident #31's physician orders dated 4/23/2024 documented, Advair HFA Inhalation Aerosol 115-21 mcg/ ACT (Fluticason-Salmeterol) 2 puff inhale orally two times a day related to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Wait 1 minute between puffs. Rinse and spit after administration. Montelukast Sodium oral tablet 10 mg (Montelukast Sodium) give 10 mg by mouth one time a day for COPD/ Asthma. b. On 7/30/2024 at 8:39 AM, during observation of medication administration for 600 hallway with Registered Nurse (RN) #25, Resident #31 did not receive Advair HFA Inhalation Aerosol, and Montelukast Sodium. c. On 7/31/24 8:55 AM, the Surveyor interviewed RN #25 and asked, Should all medications for resident #31 be available when due? She stated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    bBased on observation, record review and facility policy, review of medication pass on 7/30/2024, and 7/31/2024 it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed to maintain a medication rate of less than 5% to prevent complications for 2 (Residents # 31, and #28) of 3 residents observed during medication pass resulting in medication errors. The findings are: 1. Resident #31's admission Record dated 4/3/2024 noted a diagnoses of Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Emphysema, Wheezing, and Chronic Cough. a. Resident #31's physician orders dated 4/23/2024 documented, Advair HFA Inhalation Aerosol 115-21 mcg/ ACT (Fluticason-Salmeterol) 2 puff inhale orally two times a day related to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease(COPD). Wait 1 minute between puffs. Rinse and spit after administration. Montelukast Sodium oral tablet 10 mg (Montelukast Sodium) give 10 mg by mouth one time a day for COPD/ Asthma. b. On 7/30/2024 at 8:39 AM, during observation of medication administration for 600 hallway with Registered Nurse (RN) #25, resident #31 did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written quantified recipe and menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 1 of 1 meal observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 2 residents who received pureed diets and 10 residents who received enhanced food diets from 1 of 1 kitchen. The findings are: 1. The menu for breakfast documented the residents who received pureed diets were to receive 1 #8 scoop (1/2 cup) of hot cereal. a. On 07/31/24 at 7:50 AM, Dietary [NAME] (DC) #7 used a #16 scoop (1/4 cup) to a serve a single serving of pureed oatmeal to the residents on pureed diets, instead of a #8 scoop (1/2 cup) as specified on the facility menu. b. 07/31/24 at 8:16 AM, the surveyor asked DC #7 what scoop size she used to serve pureed oatmeal and how many servings she gave to each resident. She stated, I used the blue scoop #16 and gave a serving each. 2. On 7/31/24 a facility breakfast recipe for super cereal documented for 10 residents use 8 ounces margarine solid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared by methods that maintained flavor, appearance; hot foods were served hot and cold foods were served cold to maintain palatability and encourage adequate nutritional intake for 1 of 1 meal observed on the 400 Hall, 600 Hall, and 700 Hall. The failed practice had the potential to affect 9 residents who received meal trays in their room on 100 Hall 9 residents who received meal trays in their rooms on 200 Hall, 8 residents who received meal trays in their rooms on 300 Hall, 26 residents who received meal trays in their rooms on 400 Hall, 13 residents who received meal trays in their rooms on 500 [NAME]. 29 residents who received meal trays in their rooms on 600 Hall and 9 residents who received meal trays in their rooms on 700 Hall. as documented on a list provided by Dietary manager on 07/31/2024 at 9:30 AM. The findings are: 1. Resident #90 Minimum Data Set with an assessment reference date of 7/3/24 indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is on contact isolation does not have a roommate and that staff wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while entering the room for 1 (Resident #31) of 1 sample mix resident reviewed for contact isolation; ensure staff while providing care to a resident in an enhanced barrier precautions room wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for 4 (Resident #363, #366, #367, #371) of 4 residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions; ensure staff while providing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) medication administration and tube feeding wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and sanitized hands for 1 (Resident #28) of 1 sample mix residents reviewed for medication pass; to ensure staff maintained aseptic technique during an ordered wound care treatment for 1 (Resident #367) of 1 resident reviewed for wound care treatment; to ensure continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) face masks were contained in a storage bag when not in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure accommodation needs were met by not ensuring the call light was within reach for one (Resident #366) of one sampled resident. The findings include: A review of the Order Summary revealed Resident #366 had diagnoses of paralytic syndrome affecting right side with a stroke, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder, and that Resident #366 had an order for Treatment to skin tear to L forearm: Cleanse with wound cleanser or sterile water apply xeroform to wound bed. Cover with 4 x 4 bordered foam on MWF (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday) and PRN (as needed) until resolved. Active order as of 07/29/2024. A review of the Care Plan revealed Resident #366 Interventions/Task: Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. The resident needs a prompt response to all requests for assistance. On 07/29/2024 at 6:35 AM, the surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #21 and #22 entered Resident #366's room. The surveyor observed CNA #22 state that they will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed in a timely manner for one (Resident #371) of one sampled resident. On 07/29/2024, an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/11/2024 was reviewed. The admission MDS was started on 07/08/2024 and was currently 18 days overdue for completion. A review of the policy Resident Assessment Instrument revealed l. The Assessment Coordinator is responsible for ensuring that the Interdisciplinary Assessment Team conduct(s) timely resident assessments and reviews according to the following schedule: a. Within fourteen (14) days of the resident's admission to the facility; On 08/01/2024 at 11:15 AM, during an interview MDS Coordinator #19 stated that usually total life respite is done by MDS Coordinator #20, but she is not really aware of that and has been training on and off. We both have been working six days a week, on the floor for up to 120 hours. We have not been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan addressed and individualized appropriate care and services for 1 (Resident #103) of 1 sample mix residents. The findings are: 1. Review of Resident #103's admission Record dated 05/23/2024 revealed a diagnosis of sleep apnea. a. On 07/29/24 at 10:29 AM, the Surveyor observed a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) mask at Resident #103's bedside with CPAP mask sitting on bedside table not in a bag. Resident #103 stated, I have sleep apnea. b. Review of Resident #103's Order Summary Report, active as of 07/29/2024, did not document CPAP usage. c. On 08/01/24 at 8:26 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #103's CPAP mask at the bedside not in a storage bag. No storage bag was present. d. Review of Resident #103's Care Plan did not reveal CPAP usage. e. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/30/2024 revealed Section O0110. Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs documented the resident does not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to update person-centered care plans to reflect the residents needs for three Residents (Residents #45, #23, and #462) of four residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to accurately document code status on the care plan which could result in a negative outcome as staff could provide lifesaving measures contradictory to the residents' choice. The facility failed to develop and implement any interventions for the moderate hearing loss for Resident #45. The facility failed to update the care plan to include elopement interventions for one (Residents #462) who had attempted to elope from the facility as documented in the progress notes. The findings are: On 07/29/24 at 8:45 AM, attempted to interview resident and found the resident to be non-interview able due to her cognitive state and hearing deficit. During an interview with Advanced Practice Nurse (APRN) #30, she confirmed resident #45 had a moderate hearing deficit. When asked if there was a hearing deficit, MDS nurse #19 stated, I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure necessary foot/toenail treatment and care was provided to keep toenails trimmed and dry and to prevent flaky skin to decrease the potential for foot complications for 1 (Resident #22) of 1 sampled resident who were dependent on staff for foot/toenail care. The findings are: 1. Review of a facility policy titled Foot Care, dated 2001, indicated that Residents will receive appropriate care and treatment in order to maintain mobility and foot health. A review of an admission Record indicated Resident # 22 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with exacerbation and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with foot ulcer. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/10/2023 revealed Resident # 22 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated Resident #22 was moderately impaired. Review of Resident #22's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that Registered Dietitian recommendations were following in a timely manner for an enteral bolus feeding for one (Resident #28) of one sampled resident. The findings are: On 7/30/2024 the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked if the facility had a policy for following Registered Dietitian recommendations. The DON provided a document titled UDA-RD Recommendations. Review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #28 with diagnosis of post traumatic seizures and traumatic brain injury on 2/11/2020. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/11/2020 revealed Resident #28 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 7, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of #28 Care Plan initiated 2/25/2020 revealed the resident was at risk for nutritional problems or potential for nutritional problems related to diagnosis. The interventions included Registered Dietitian (RD) to evaluate quarterly and as needed (PRN). Monitor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure enteral water flush was administered per physicians' orders for a resident with a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube during medication administration based on professional standards of care for 1 (Resident #28) of 1 sample mix resident. The findings are: 1. Review of Resident #28's admission Record dated 02/11/2020 revealed diagnoses of dysphagia and gastrostomy status. a. Review of Resident #28's Physician orders dated 01/23/2023 documented, Enteral feed order every shift Enteral Water Flush; with 60 (cubic centimeter) cc water before and after meds and feedings. Enteral feed order four times a day 300 milliliters (mL) enteral water flush four times per day (QID). b. On 07/31/24 at 8:53 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #28 and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #16 during medication pass. Resident #28 received a total of 330 milliliters (mL) water flush. Resident 28 received 40 mL water flush prior to medication administration through PEG tube,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) failed to maintain records of their program that developed and implemented effective improvement plans to correct identified areas of concern. The facility failed to ensure the facility was able to provide its QAPI plan to the State surveyors during recertification survey or upon request. On 8/2/24 10:30 AM, Administrator states he is unable to provide records of the QA (Quality Assurance) committee meetings when requested. The administrator states, We can't find them, I've been here a week, and I don't have them.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to knock on doors prior to entering resident rooms for 4 resident rooms (Rooms 609, 610, 612, and 613) viewed for protecting and valuing the resident's private space. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Resident Rights, revised December 2016 indicated per policy statement, Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. A. a dignified existence; b. be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity; and t. privacy and confidentiality. During an observation on 07/02/2024 at 6:43 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4 entered room [ROOM NUMBER] without knocking on the resident's door and walked into the room, donned gloves and turned on the overhead light. CNA #4 turned back the covers on the resident without explaining what she was about to do, after checking the resident, covered the resident, took off gloves and walked out of the room without sanitizing her hands. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-03 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses have the knowledge, competencies, and skill sets to provide care and respond to each resident's individualized needs as identified in resident assessment, care plans, and physician orders for 2 (Resident #6 and Resident #7) of 2 residents reviewed for assessments, care plans, and competent staff. Specifically, the facility: 1. Failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS)was completed in accordance with guidelines set forth in the Resident Assessment Instrument for Resident #6. 2. Failed to ensure that care plans were revised and updated according to the resident's current physician orders, assessments, and resident's current individualized needs for Resident #6 and Resident #7. 3. Failed to ensure that Medicare Manager, Long Term Care MDS Nurse and Treatment nurse were skilled and knowledgeable in their job responsibilities with care planning for Resident #6 and Resident #7. 4. Failure to update physician orders when changes were needed and failure to follow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were implemented to prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections as evidenced by failure to perform hand hygiene between residents, during perineal care and wound care to prevent cross contamination. The findings are: During an observation on 07/02/2024 at 6:43 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4 entered room [ROOM NUMBER], donned gloves, and turned on the overhead light. CNA #4 turned back the covers on the resident without explaining what was about to occur. After checking the resident, CNA #4 covered the resident, took off gloves and walked out of the room without sanitizing hands. During an observation on 07/02/2024 at 6:47 AM, CNA #4 and CNA #5 entered room [ROOM NUMBER]. CNA #4 did not sanitize hands before applying new gloves. An explanation was given to the resident prior to uncovering resident to check their brief. During an observation on 07/02/2024 at 6:50…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a comfortable, sanitary, clean, and homelike environment was provided in facility hallways and in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The findings are: On 07/01/2024 at 10:01 AM, surveyor observed in room [ROOM NUMBER], the right wall near the bathroom has missing paint and drywall in a horizontal line along the length of the wall. The floor near the baseboard is covered in a black substance. Surveyor observed on the right side of the room, the back wall is missing dry wall in three vertical lines and several white dots are scattered on the wall. Near the light above the entrance, the ceiling is cracked and bubbled. On 07/01/2024 at 10:43 AM, the surveyor observed an open bag sitting in a chair against the wall by room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 07/01/2024 at 10:44 AM, the surveyor observed a large pink cup with a lid and a straw setting on the handrail by room [ROOM NUMBER], and a small clear cup, empty with a fork inside, setting on the handrail by room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure incontinent care was provided is a safe manner to prevent a resident from sliding out of the bed resulting in the resident receiving a fracture of the femur for 1 (Resident #2) of 1 sampled resident. The findings are: Resident #2 was admitted to facility on 4/18/22 with diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side. A Care Plan initiated on 4/18/22 documented, .The resident has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit r/t [related to] left sided paralysis, hx [history] of polio .The resident is at risk for falls. Resident had fall with major injury on 11/14/2023 . On 11/14/23 at 5:10 am, the Incident and Accident report documented, cnas (Certified Nursing Assistants) were turning resident and she rolled out of bed. she did not hit her head and complained of left knee and hip pain. x-rays ordered. Immediate Intervention: educated cnas on resident safety when changing residents and rolling them side to side while in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate care to include, completing admission assessment, completing initial body audit and failed to ensure treatment and services were in place to prevent pressure ulcers for 1 resident. R#1. The findings are: The facility did not complete an admission assessment on the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Per the resident's record, there was no admission assessment or skin audit completed on the day of admission. The first skin audit completed for Resident #1 was on 10/2/23 per the resident's record review. The 9/21/23 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) did not document any skin conditions upon admission. The current plan of care was revised on 10/26/23 to reflect DTI (Deep Tissue Injury) to right heel. Wound care orders were implemented on 10/5/23 according to record review of the physician orders for the DTI on the right heel for Resident #1. An interview was conducted with Resident #1 on 10/26/23 at approximately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was answered in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #5) and fingers were clean and trimmed for 4 (Residents #6, #7, #8 and #9) of 16 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15 and #16) sampled residents who required assistance with activities of daily living. The findings are: 1. Resident #5: a. On 10/02/23 at 12:28 PM, Resident #5 was lying in bed. The Surveyor the care she was receiving. Resident #5 replied, They are a little slow. Sometimes it takes a while to get my medications to me and give me a bath, but they are shorthanded, so I try to work with them. The Surveyor asked if she had to wait a long time when she uses the call light. Resident #5 responded, A lot of the time. The Surveyor asked if she had ever urinated or soiled herself while waiting on assistance. Resident #5 responded, I've wet myself a couple of times while waiting for help. b. A Care Plan with an initiated date of 05/15/23 noted Resident #5 required assistance of 1 staff for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to meet the needs of residents who required assistance with activities of daily living. This failed practice had the potential to affect all 111 residents who resided in the facility. The findings included: 1. During an interview on 09/12/23 at 11:38 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 confirmed Resident #57 is scheduled for showers on Mondays and Thursdays, and confirmed they were not charted for yesterday or today and could not identify when the last bath or shower was documented. CNA #2 said the CNAs are overwhelmed and it's hard to chart on so many people, and further stated it is usually just one CNA on the hall. CNA #2 said the staff struggles to get everyone showered and changed. CNA #2 said Resident #57 probably got a bath on 9/7/23. 2. During an interview on 09/12/23 at 3:10 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 said the nurses and CNAs work 12-hour shifts. LPN #1 said there is usually only one CNA per hall on the day shift and the night shift has 2 CNAs per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. The failed practice had the potential to affect 109 residents who received meals from the kitchen, (total census: 111), as documented on a list provided by Dietary Supervisor #1 on 09/13/23 at 11:55 PM. The findings are: 1. On 09/12/23 at 12:08 PM, Dietary Employee (DE) #1 opened the door to the Storage Room and went in. DE #1 unzipped a bag that contained slices of cheese, without washing her hands, she removed slices of cheese from the bag and bagged them individually to be served to the residents for snack. 2. On 09/12/23 at 12:10 PM, DE #2 removed serving spoons from the drawer and placed them on the steam table. Without washing her hands, she picked up a clean blade and attached it to the base of the blender to be used in pureeing food items to be served to the residents for the lunch meal. 3. On 09/12/23 at 12:14 PM DE #2 picked up a pot that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in a clean and homelike manner for 6 (Rooms 401, 408, 413, 508, 601 and 610) of 41 (Rooms 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 614, 615 and 616) resident rooms on the 400 Hall, 500 Hall and 600 Hall. The findings are: On 09/11/23 at 2:40 PM, the floor in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] contained dirt and debris. The area around the oxygen concentrator contained food particles of a variety of colors, shapes, and sizes. The floor under the trash can and the bedside table was littered with dirt and food particles. Across the floor and under an accent table were large pieces of dirt, lint, and dead insects, extending up to the corner of the wall. On 09/13/23 at 9:30 AM, the floor in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] contained the same areas of dirt and debris that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-15 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure quarterly resident assessments were completed no later than the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) plus 14 calendar days and were submitted within 14 days after completion to meet the requirements for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for 4 (Residents #66, #84, #67 and #90) of 4 sampled residents whose Quarterly Assessments were reviewed. The findings are: 1. Resident #66's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an ARD of 08/09/23 had a completion date of 09/12/23. 2. Resident #84's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 08/02/23 had a completion date of 09/13/23. 3. Resident #67's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 08/05/23 had a completion date of 09/13/23. 4. Resident #90's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 08/02/23 had a completion date 09/13/23. 5. On 09/15/23 at 2:25 PM, the Surveyor asked the MDS Coordinator how long from the assessment reference date do you have to submit an update. The MDS Coordinator stated, Two weeks. The Surveyor asked what guidelines were followed in relation to submitting. The MDS Coordinator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a method that maintained the appearance and at temperatures that were acceptable to the residents during 1 of 1 meal observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 10 residents who received meal trays in their rooms on the 100 Hall, 10 residents who received meal trays on the 200 Hall, 14 residents who received meal trays in their room on the 300 Hall, 24 residents who received meal trays in their room on 400 Hall, 13 residents who received meal trays in their room on the 500 hall, 24 residents who received meal trays in their room on the 600 Hall, and 11 residents who received meal trays in their room on the 700 hall as documented on a list provided by Dietary Supervisor #1 on 09/13/23 at 9:36 AM. The findings are: 1. On 09/11/23 at 1:30 PM, the Surveyor asked Resident #94 if the hot food stays hot and the cold food is cold. Resident #94 stated, The Food here is always cold. Lunch arrived while the Surveyor was in the room. Resident #94 did not eat the mixed vegetables.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with a trust account had access to their personal funds after business hours and on weekends for 2 (Residents #32 and #73) of 2 (Residents #32, #73,) sampled residents. The findings are: On 09/12/23 at 8:58 AM, the Surveyor asked Resident #32 who handled his money. Resident #32 indicated that his money is handled by the facility. The Surveyor asked if he was able to get his money on the weekends. Resident #32 said he was unable to retrieve personal funds on the weekends. On 09/14/23 at 1:00 PM, during the Residential Council Meeting, the Surveyor asked Resident #73 who handled his money. Resident #73 indicated that his money is handled by the facility. The Surveyor asked if he was able to get his money on the weekends. Resident #73 said, There is usually a nurse that has some that she will let me have till Monday. On 09/14/23 at 3:05 PM, the Surveyor asked the Business Office Manager if the residents have access to their money on weekends. The Business Office Manager stated, We just got approved, where we…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of daily living (ADL) care was provided for 4 (Residents #26, #59, #75 and #81) of 13 (Residents #4, #14, #26, #37, #48, #49, #59, #73, #75, #81, #83, #94 and #307) sampled residents who were dependent or required assistance with ADL care. The findings are: 1. Resident #81: a. On 09/11/23 at 12:03 PM, Resident #81's fingernails were jagged and extended ¼ inch past the tips of the fingers. b. On 09/12/23 at 2:38 PM, Resident #81's fingernails had uneven, jagged edges and extended ¼ inch past the tips of the fingers. c. On 09/12/23 at 9:20 AM, Resident #81's fingernails had uneven, jagged edges and extended ¼ inch past the tips of the fingers. d. On 09/14/2023 at 09:30 AM, Resident #81's fingernails had uneven, jagged edges and extended ¼ inch past the tips of the fingers. e. On 09/14/23 at 9:45 AM, the Surveyor asked Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, How often is nailcare performed? CNA #1 replied, There is a list on specific days and nailcare is completed on shower days. f. On 09/14/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication administered by a family member was ordered by the attending physician for 1 (Resident #357) of 1 sampled resident. The findings are: On 09/13/23 at 11:42 AM, Resident #357's family member was at the Nurses Station requesting to give resident a medication brought from home. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6 authorized the family member to give the ophthalmic solution to the resident stated, Just don't leave it in the room. During an interview on 09/13/23 at 12:00 PM, LPN #6, said the resident had an order for artificial tears, which had not been given, and said it is not a regular practice to allow families to bring medications in from home. A review of Resident #357 physician orders failed to reveal an order for artificial tears. During an interview on 09/13/23 at 12:06 PM, the Director of The DON confirmed Resident #357 did not have an order for artificial tears.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended in resident rooms for 2 (Resident #14, #48) of 2 sampled residents. The findings are: 1. On 09/11/23 at 11:06 AM, observed a bottle of prescription nasal spray for allergies on Resident #14's bedside table. No staff were noted in the area. b. On 09/12/23 at 9:00 AM, Resident #14 revealed the nurses leave her medications on her bedside table when she is in the bathroom. The Surveyor asked if her allergy nasal spray was left for her on 09/11/23. Resident #14 replied, They left it for me when I was in the restroom because they knew they can trust me to do it. c. During an interview on 09/13/23 at 9:30 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) #1, said Resident #14 can administer allergy nasal spray with the nurse present and confirmed the medication should not be left at the bedside. RN #1 further said she might have accidentally left the allergy nasal spray in Resident #14's room. 2. On 09/11/23 at 11:04 AM, Resident #48 had an opened bottle of Artificial Tears and an opened bottle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer Oxygen at the Physician ordered flow rate for 1 (Residents #57) and failed to ensure the nebulizer mouthpiece was stored in a bag for 1 (Resident #48) of 14 (Residents #4, #32, #33, #41, #42, #48, #49, #52, #57, #59, #75, #81, #90 and #357) sampled residents who received respiratory therapy. The findings are: 1. On 09/11/23 at 2:58 PM, Resident #57 was lying in bed with oxygen at 2.5 liters per minute via nasal canula. a. On 09/12/23 at 9:25 AM, Resident #57 was lying in bed with oxygen at 2.5 liters per minute via nasal canula. b. On 09/12/23 at 2:30 PM, Resident #57 was sitting on the side of bed visiting with family with oxygen at 2.5 liters per minute via nasal cannula. c. On 09/13/23 at 8:10 AM, Resident #57 was lying in bed with oxygen at 2.5 liters per minute via nasal cannula. d. Review of the Order List Report for oxygen therapy showed Resident #57 had a Physicians Order, with a revision date of 10/25/22 to receive oxygen at 3 liters per minute by nasal cannula. f. Review of Resident #57's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure opened vials of insulin were dated, medication carts were locked, and medications were not left on top of the medication carts when out of the line of the nurse's sight. The findings included: 1. On 09/13/23 at 11:00 AM, observed on the 600 Hall Medication Cart an opened vial of Insulin with a resident's name. There was no open or use by date written on the vial. a. During an interview on 09/15/23 at 8:50 AM, LPN #5 confirmed the insulin should be dated when opened and is typically good for 28 to 30 days. b. During an interview on 09/15/23 at 8:55 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed the insulin vials should be dated when opened and are good for 28-30 days. c. An Insert for the opened insulin provided by the Administrator on 09/15/23 at 11:50 AM indicated the Insulin was to be used within 42 days after opened. 2. On 09/13/23 at 11:07 AM, observed Registered Nurse (RN) #1 leave a bottle of allergy nasal spray on the medication cart, then enter Resident #408's room and shut the door. At 11:08 AM, RN #1 opened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to prevent repeated deficiencies with maintaining a clean, comfortable homelike environment, with distributing and serving food in a sanitary manner, preventing accidents and hazards, and providing respiratory care. These failed practices had the potential to affect all 111 residents who resided in the facility. The findings are: 1. A Recertification survey was conducted on 07/01/22. During the survey, the team identified concerns with housekeeping, providing fingernail care to dependent residents, preventing accidents and hazards, providing respiratory care, and preparing and serving food in a sanitary manner. a. A review of the facility's Plan of Correction for maintaining a homelike environment, with a completion date of 08/01/22 included: a. Housekeeping/Laundry Supervisor ensured all other bed linens in the facility were free and clean from stains and in acceptable condition for use on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff changed gloves and washed hands during wound care for 1 (Resident #307), failed to maintain a bath table free of cracks, staff failed to perfume hand hygiene during medication administration, and laundry staff used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and clean technique when providing laundry services. These failed practices have the potential to affect 31 residents who received wound care, 24 residents who used the bath table, and all 111 residents who resided in the facility. The findings are: The following observations were made on 09/13/2023. a. At 9:55 AM, the Surveyor observed wound care performed for Resident #307. LPN #2 removed the old dressing and placed it in a red bag. She then handled the cotton tipped applicator with ungloved hands, laid the applicator back on the table, and left the room without washing or sanitizing her hands to get more gloves from the wound cart in the hallway. LPN #2 returned to Resident #307's room and did not sanitize or wash her hands. She placed extra…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.8-2.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 53.5-2.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
2 of 5Bailey Creek Health And RehabTexarkana, AR 2 of 5Magnolia Square Nursing And RehabSpringfield, MO 2 of 5St. Elizabeth's PlaceJonesboro, AR 2 of 5Twin Lakes Therapy And LivingFlippin, AR 2 of 5Westwood Health And Rehab, INCSpringdale, AR 3 of 5Alcoa Pines Health And RehabilitationBenton, AR 3 of 5Birch Pointe Health And RehabilitationSpringfield, MO 3 of 5James River Nursing And RehabilitationSpringfield, MO 3 of 5The Lakes At Maumelle Health And RehabilitationMaumelle, AR 3 of 5Timberlane Health & RehabilitationEl Dorado, AR 3 of 5Windcrest Health And Rehab INCSpringdale, AR 4 of 5Beebe Retirement Center, Inc.Beebe, AR 4 of 5Chapel Woods Health And RehabilitationWarren, AR 4 of 5Evergreen Living Center At StagecoachBryant, AR 4 of 5Gassville Therapy And LivingGassville, AR 4 of 5Heritage Living CenterConway, AR 4 of 5Hiram Shaddox Health And RehabMountain Home, AR 4 of 5Katherine's Place at WedingtonFayetteville, AR 4 of 5Maples Health And Rehabilitation, TheSpringfield, MO 4 of 5Mountain Meadows Health And RehabilitationBatesville, AR 4 of 5Oak Ridge Health And RehabilitationEl Dorado, AR 4 of 5Silver Oaks Health And RehabilitationCamden, AR 4 of 5Southridge Village Nursing And RehabHeber Springs, AR 5 of 5Amberwood Health And RehabilitationBenton, AR 5 of 5Care Manor Nursing And RehabMountain Home, AR 5 of 5Chambers Health And RehabilitationCarlisle, AR 5 of 5Corning Therapy And Living CenterCorning, AR 5 of 5Eaglecrest Nursing And RehabAsh Flat, AR 5 of 5Edgewood Health And RehabSpringdale, AR 5 of 5North Hills Life Care and RehabFayetteville, AR 5 of 5Pioneer Therapy And LivingMelbourne, AR 5 of 5Rector Nursing And RehabRector, AR 5 of 5Southfork River Therapy And LivingSalem, AR 5 of 5Spring Creek Health & RehabCabot, AR 5 of 5The Crossing At Riverside Health And RehabilitatioSearcy, AR 5 of 5The Maples At Har-Ber MeadowsSpringdale, ARNot ratedQuail Run Health And RehabTrumann, AR

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
3B HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF46%since 01/01/2017
ADAMS, ANTHONYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2008
SIMMONS FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2017
CAHOONE, PATRICIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
TALBOT, LAURENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
THOMPSON, MARLISAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/16/2026
ADAMS, BRYANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2017
ELLIS, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
KOEHLER, TOBEYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/14/2008
CHC RE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2017
LTC SYSTEMS/RX, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2008
PHARMACY CONSULTS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2008
RELIANCE HEALTH CARE, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2008
MCGINNIS, LARRYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2008
TREECE, BRANNONIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.8M
Related-party expense29% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 57%Medicare 15%Other / private 28%

This home reported $3.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$301per resident / day
operating cost
$9,156per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$347per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arkansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Arkansas
$7,452/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,060/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,637/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 045327. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next