Chambers Health And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 46.1 residents a day — about 51% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.38 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a nurse demonstrated competency in the administration of an intramuscular (IM) injection for one (Resident #6) of one resident reviewed for administration of an IM injection. The findings include: During an observation of an 8:00AM medication administration pass on 12/10/2025, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 took a one-gram (gm) vial of antibiotic injection powder and injected 3.2 milliliters (ml) of a local numbing agent into the vial of antibiotic powder to reconstitute the medication for use. After the medication was completely dissolved in the local numbing agent, LPN #1 took a five cubic centimeter (cc) syringe with a 23 gauge (g) (x) 1 inch needle attached and withdrew the liquid medication from the antibiotic vial. After LPN #1 put on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), she entered Resident #6's room to administer the medication. LPN #1 held a 5-cc syringe with a 23 g x 1 inch needle attached, in her hand and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent (%) during the medication administration of one (Resident #6) of seven residents who received medications from three Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs). Twenty-six opportunities of medication administration were observed, and two errors were observed, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.69%. The findings include: During an observation on 12/10/2025 at 8:00AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 took a one-gram (gm) vial of antibiotic injection powder and injected 3.2 milliliters (ml) of a local numbing agent into the vial of antibiotic powder to reconstitute the medication for use. After the medication was completely dissolved in the local numbing agent, LPN #1 took a five cubic centimeter (cc) syringe with a 23 gauge (g) (x) 1 inch needle attached and withdrew the liquid medication from the antibiotic vial. After LPN #1 put on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired food items were promptly removed from stock to maintain freshness and prevent potential cross contamination, failed to ensure dietary staff practiced good hand washing to prevent potential cross contamination, and manufacturer specification was followed to maintain food quality. These failed practices had the potential to affect 47 residents who received meals from the kitchen (Total Census: 47), as stated on a list provided by the Dietary Manager on 07/30/24 at AM. The findings are: 1. On 07/29/24 at 9:30 AM, a container of grated parmesan cheese on a shelf in the 2-door refrigerator had an expiration date 6/4/2024. 2. On 07/29/24 at 9:45 AM, the following observations were made on a shelf in the kitchen storge room: a. A box of white cake mix with an expiration date of 6/24/2024. b. A container of chili powder with an expiration date of 5/28/2024. c. An opened gallon of parsley flakes with an expiration date of date of 1/24/2023 d. At 9:46 AM, an opened bottle of pancake syrup was in a container under the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the required personal protective equipment (PPE) was utilized by staff prior to entering a resident's room who was on contact and droplet precautions for 1 (Resident #153) of 1 sampled resident who was reviewed for transmission-based precautions. The findings are: A review of the July 2024 Order Summary indicated Resident #153 had a diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and an order for contact/droplet isolation that started on 7/26/2024 through 7/30/2024. A review of the Care Plan dated 7/26/2024 indicated Resident #153 had tested positive for COVID-19 and was to be monitored for signs and symptoms of respiratory distress and to use contact and droplet precautions. On 07/29/2024 at 11:41 AM, a droplet precautions sign on Resident #153's door indicated, .Everyone must: clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Make sure their eyes, nose and mouth are fully covered before room entry [There was a picture of a person wearing a face shield or goggles] .Remove face…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents medication were not left at bedside for one (Resident #4) of four sampled residents. The findings are: Resident #4 had diagnoses which included Hypertension and Cirrhosis of the liver. The admission Minimum Data Set [MDS] with an Assessment Reference Date [ARD] of 01/22/2024 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status [BIMS] of 11 (7-12 indicates moderately impaired). On 03/25/2024 at 10:27 AM, Resident #4 was observed lying in bed in their room. A plastic cup of medication and plastic cup of water was observed sitting on top of a miniature refrigerator on the bedside table to the left of the resident. The cup contained 3 round white tablets, a small blue oblong tablet, a pinkish round tablet, and a red gel tablet. When the resident was asked if [he/she] had taken [his/her] medication that morning, [he/she] confirmed they had. Physician orders documented, Furosemide .Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to Essential hypertension, Lactulose Oral Solution .Give two times a day…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the hot water temperature in resident rooms at a safe temperature to prevent scalding of residents in 20 (Rooms 201-219) resident rooms on the 200 Hall in the facility. On 08/07/2023 at 9:35 AM the surveyor tested the water temperature in the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The surveyor was unable to hold their hand in the water due to the temperature being too hot. On 08/07/2023 at 11:00 AM Maintenance #1 tested the water temperature in room [ROOM NUMBER] in the presence of the surveyor. Maintenance #1 stated the temperature was 145 degrees Fahrenheit and stated, I usually try and keep it between 110 and 115 degrees Fahrenheit. Maintenance #1 confirmed the temperature of the water was too hot and would burn the residents. On 08/09/2023 at 3:25 PM the Administrator confirmed the residents on the 200 hall were in danger of being burned due to the temperature of the water. A review of the policy titled, Water Temperatures, Safety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility medication error rate was 5.71%. The findings are: During the medication pass observation, the error rate was 5.71 %. A review of Resident #21 August physicians order noted an order for, Neurontin Capsule 400 MG three times a day related to pain in the right foot, with an order date of 9/11/20. The order further stated to be given in addition to 100mg to =500mg. A review of Resident #21 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 8/1/23 through 8/31/23 noted the Neurontin was administered at 8:00 AM, 12:00 PM, and 4:00 PM. On 8/09/23 at 8:09 AM during an observation of medication pass, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 administered Resident #21 Neurontin 100mg capsule. She stated, pharmacy is going to bring the 400 mg this morning. The surveyor informed LPN #1 to let her know when she gets ready to administer the 400mg of Neurontin otherwise it would be considered a missed dose. On 8/09/23 at 10:57 AM LPN #1 stated, I'm getting ready to give the Neurontin. The surveyor asked, What dose will you be giving? She stated, I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan with change of resident orders for oxygen therapy for 1 (Resident #15) of 2 sampled residents (resident #15 and #37). The findings are: A review of Resident #15 physician's orders with a start date of 7/17/23 indicated the resident to receive oxygen as needed for shortness of breath. A review of resident #15 Progress Notes dated 7/23/2023 at 6:15 pm noted the resident was in bed with oxygen on via nasal canula. A review of resident #15 Progress Notes dated 7/24/2023 at 11:52am noted the resident was in a chair with oxygen on via nasal canula. A review of resident #15 care plan revealed a care plan for altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing, but failed to include an intervention for oxygen therapy, as ordered by the physician. On 08/09/2023 at 2:30 pm the surveyor asked the (Director of Nurses), DON, if a resident has orders for oxygen should the care plan be revised to show the focus, goal and interventions related to oxygen therapy? She replied, yes, I would put it on the care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR