St. Elizabeth's Place

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 112 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 69.8 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, video surveillance review, facility document review, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the facility provided an environment that was free from avoidable accidents and hazards for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility staff failed to address a sounding alarm on an exit door that directly opened to an unsecured area and allowed Resident #1, who had an altered mental status, to leave the facility premises and travel to an establishment located 0.1 miles behind the facility without the facility's knowledge.It was determined the facility's past non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to the resident. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to the Stated Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.25 (Quality of Care) for elopement at a scope and severity level of J. The IJ was identified at 04/01/2026 at 4:45 PM.The Director of Operations and the Registered Nurse Consultant (RNC)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene and utilized necessary personal protective equipment (PPE) for 1 (Resident #27) of 1 resident reviewed for isolation precautions. The findings are: 1. A review of the admission Record noted Resident #27 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included severe intellectual disability and autistic disorder. 2. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/25/2025, revealed Resident #27 was unable to complete a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), with a score of 00. 3. A review of the Physician Order Summary revealed Resident #27 was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), due to the wound to their left knee. 4. During an observation on 05/20/2025 at 5:30 AM, CNA #2 and CNA #3 were observed transferring Resident #27 using a mechanical lift and changing Resident #27's clothing.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility to ensure food preparation equipment was free of debris to prevent potential for cross contamination; spices stored in the cabinet or on a shelf in the storage room were dated for first-in-first out spice rotation; 1 of 2 ice machines and 1 of 2 ice scoop holders were maintained in clean and sanitary condition; and dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment to prevent potential food borne illness for the residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. The failed practice had the potential to affect 89 residents who received meals from the kitchen (total census 89). The findings are. 1. On 03/04/24 at 10:51 AM, the deep fryer had an accumulation of crumbs floating on the top of the oil. The Surveyor asked the Dietary Supervisor (DS) when they last used the deep fryer and how often they cleaned it. The DS stated, They used it on Friday, and we clean it once a week. The surveyor asked the DS if the crumbs should still be on the oil. The DS stated, They should have been strained on Friday. 2. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility to ensure a call light was within reach for 2 (Resident #6 and R#387) of 17 sample mix residents who could use a call light. The findings are: 1. Resident #6 had diagnoses of Dementia, Muscle wasting and atrophy, Epilepsy, Difficulty in walking, and Abnormalities of gait and mobility. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/25/24 showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 (13 to 15 indicates cognitive intactness). 1a. The care plan showed .staff are to encourage the resident to .utilize the call light for assistance, if needed . 1b. On 03/04/24 at 01:25 PM, the Surveyor observed Resident # 6 call light lying on the floor. 1c. On 03/04/24 at 03:09 PM, the Surveyor observed the resident's call light lying on the floor. 1d. On 03/04/24 at 03:13 PM, the Surveyor asked Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #6, Where should a call light be placed while a resident is in bed? CNA #6 stated, Within reach. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure residents meals were removed from the serving trays in the dining room to de-emphasize the institutional character of the setting to promote dignity and respect. This failed practice had the potential to affect 3 (Residents #20, #30, and #73) sampled residents who eat in the dining room. The findings are: On 03/04/24 at 12:54 PM, the Surveyor observed the Director of Nursing (DON) delivering meals to 3 separate residents, leaving the plate of food and drinks on the serving tray. On 03/04/24 at 01:02 PM, the DON confirmed leaving the meals on a serving tray was not homelike. A document titled Resident Rights provided by the Nurse Consultant on 3/5/24 at 2:45 pm showed, .Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents .The rights include .be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity .

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner. This failed practice had the potential to affect 2 (Resident #43 and #82) of 17 sample mix residents who can use a call light. The findings are: 1. On 03/04/24 at 02:24 PM, the Surveyor observed Resident #43 push the call light after indicating to the Surveyor they were wet. The call light sounded and then stopped. No light came on outside of the door. 1a. On 03/04/24 at 02:36 PM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) answered the call light then left the room. 1b. On 03/04/24 at 02:39 PM, the CNA returned to the room with Nursing Assistant (NA) #2. 1c. On 03/04/24 at 02:44 PM, the Surveyor asked NA #2, Do the lights come on outside the door when a resident presses their call light? CNA #7 stated, The lights do not turn on outside the door or make an alarm. The room number and time shows up on the hall clock and on the screen at the nurse's desk. The Surveyor asked, Why did it take so long to answer Resident #43's call light? NA #2 stated, There are 2 NA's and 1 CNA. We each…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth lump-free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for residents who required pureed diets for 2 of 2 meals observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 6 residents who received pureed diets. The findings are: 1. On 03/04/24 at 11:35 AM, Dietary Employee (DE) #1 placed 6 servings of sliced ham into a blender, added juice from the cooked ham, used #10 scoop to add a serving of thickener and pureed. At 11:37 AM, DE #1 poured the pureed ham into a pan to be served to the residents on pureed diets for lunch. The mixture did not have a smooth consistency and had particles of thickener that were not completely pureed, and there were pieces of intact ham visible in the mixture. 2. On 03/04/24 11:44 AM, DE #1 placed 6 servings of cornbread into a blender, added 2 cartons of warm whole milk and pureed. At 11:47 AM, DE #1 poured the pureed cornbread into a pan and placed it in the oven. The consistency of the pureed cornbread was lumpy and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Dementia in-service training was provided in the past year. The findings are: On 03/07/24 at 11:20 AM, The Surveyor reviewed in-services and competency training for the past year and did not locate a Dementia in-service. The Surveyor requested the Dementia In-Service. On 03/07/24 at 11:29 AM, the Administrator stated, We looked through all the in-services and could not find one for Dementia. The Surveyor asked, Do you have a Dementia in-service for the past year? The Administrator confirmed there has been no Dementia in-service training for the last year.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure that 1 (Resident #56) of 1 sampled got to go to their smoke breaks. The findings are: On 3/04/24 at 1:47 pm, Resident (R) #56 reported not having gotten to go out to smoke for 3 days, and that when a certified nursing assistant (CNA) was asked they say they don't have time or enough staff to take resident to smoke. On 3/05/24 at 10:45 am, the Director of Nurses (DON) was asked, Does [R #56] smoke? The DON confirmed, Yes, this resident does go out sometimes to smoke. The DON was asked, If a resident asks to be gotten up to smoke what should the staff do, and stated, The staff should get the resident up and take them. The DON was asked, If a resident refuses to get up to go smoke after asking staff to come and get them, up what should the staff do? The DON confirmed, Document that they didn't want to get up. On 3/05/24 at 10:45 am, the Nurse Consultant (NC) was asked, Should [R #56] be on the smoking list if a resident smokes, and is care planned for smoking? The NC confirmed, Yes, we will get them added…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fingernails were regularly trimmed and cleaned to promote good personal hygiene and grooming. This failed practice had the potential to affect 2 (Resident #31 and R#44) residents of 21 sampled residents; and the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #72) of 11 sampled residents received a shave. The findings are: 1. Resident (R) #44 diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, Dementia with agitation, and Bell's palsy. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/29/24 showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 01 (0 to 7 points indicates severe cognitive impairment). R #44 required maximum/substantial assistance with personal hygiene. 1a. The care plan for R #44 showed the resident required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) related to weakness and cognitive loss. Staff are to provide assistance to the extent necessary with ADL (hygiene, etc.) and the resident requires minimal assistance x1 with ADL tasks. 1b. On 03/04/24 at 01:46 PM, R #44 ' s fingernails…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (Resident #32) of 1 sampled resident received a thorough head to toe skin assessment. This had the ability to affect 89 residents. The findings are: On 3/4/24 at 11:29 am, Resident (R) #32 reported they had a sore on the top of the head that was draining. The Surveyor observed a sore with a scab and open area with drainage on the top of the resident's head. The Surveyor asked if the Resident had informed anyone. R #32 stated, I have been telling my nurse on every shift for 2 or 3 weeks that I need to see my doctor, and no one has done anything. I really need to see my doctor. On 3/5/24 at 11:30 am, Skin assessments documenting no sore to R #32 had been completed for the past two weeks. On 3/7/24 at 8:20 am, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 was asked, When a skin audit is performed how should this be done? LPN #3 stated, Start with the head and move down over the entire body. LPN #3 was asked, If a Resident complains to the nurse that they have a draining sore what should the nurse do? LPN #3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,350 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,350 — penalty dated 2026-04-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR