Care Manor Nursing And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 67.5 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.44 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.10 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately completed for five (Resident #7, Resident #4, Resident #69, Resident # 34, and Resident #58) of 10 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The findings include: Resident #7 Review of Resident #7's Medical Records on 08/26/2025 at 9:16 AM indicated there was no Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) information available in the electronic medical record. Review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #7 on 04/24/2025 with diagnoses which included depression, generalized anxiety disorder, altered mental status and cognitive communication deficit. Review of an Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/28/2025, indicated Resident #7 had a diagnosis of a psychotic disorder. Review of medical diagnoses indicated the resident had no diagnosis of a psychotic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to address intravenous therapy, primary diagnoses, and antibiotic therapy in the comprehensive care plan for one (Resident #52) of one resident reviewed. The findings include: A review of Resident #52's admission Record revealed that the facility admitted Resident #52 on 07/29/2025 with medical diagnoses which included brain dysfunction caused by liver damage and bacteria in the blood. A review of Resident #52's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with assessment reference date (ARD) of 08/01/2025, revealed that Resident #52 had a Brief Status of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also revealed that Resident #52 received antibiotics and had intravenous (IV) access. A review of Resident #52's Order Summary dated 07/29/2025 revealed that Resident #52 received two IV antibiotics for brain dysfunction caused by liver damage and bacteria in the blood. A review of Resident #52's Care Plan did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a written bed hold notification was issued prior to a hospital transfer for 1 (Resident #1) of 1 resident reviewed for transfer process. The findings include: A review of Resident #1's, admission Agreement, signed 07/27/2021 by Resident #1's authorized representative indicated, except for emergent situations, before the facility transfers a resident to a hospital the facility will provide written information to the resident specifying the amount of time a bed will be held and any corresponding charges. A review of Resident #1's progress note dated 11/18/2024 at 10:53 PM revealed, Resident #1 was transferred via Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to the hospital at 10:00 PM for a fracture to the right femur neck. A review of Resident #1's hospital record titled, Patient Care Report for the ambulance run indicated the transport priority was Non-Emergent Stable. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was revised or updated for 1 (Resident #47) sampled resident. The findings are: Review of an Order Summary revealed Resident #47 had a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of brain. On a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/27/2024 Resident #47 received a score of 3 (0-7 indicates severely cognitive impaired) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status. The MDS documented the resident requires substantial/maximum assistance with personal hygiene. On 05/14/2024 at 12:56 PM, a review of the residents electronic medical record revealed a physician's order for admission to Elite Hospice on 03/27/24. A nurses progresses notes recorded on 03/27/2024 at 2:48 PM recorded, [named hospice provider] RN here and resident admitted to their care. No new orders received at this time. On 05/15/2024 at 8:53 PM, a review of Resident #47's care plan identified a focus area of, The resident has a terminal diagnosis or poor prognosis related to end…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days without documentation from the attending physician or prescribing practitioner indicating their rationale in the resident's medical record for 2 (Residents #11 and #42) sampled residents that were selected for medication review. The findings are: 1. Review of Medical Diagnoses indicated Resident #11 had diagnoses of unspecified dementia, depression, cerebral infarction, and anxiety disorder. a. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 02/16/2024 indicated Resident #11 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, indicating the assessment could not be completed. b. Review of a Physician's Order indicated an order dated 01/17/2024 for Clonazepam 0.5 milligram (mg) every 6 hours as needed for anxiety. c. Review of Medication Administration Records (MAR) for January ,February, March, and April of 2024 revealed that Clonazepam 0.5mg was being administered every 6 hours as needed. d.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that narcotic medications were stored in a permanently affixed compartment to prevent the potential of misappropriation of resident property, that multi-use vials were dated when opened, and medications from discharged residents were appropriately accounted for and secured to prevent misappropriation of medications. The findings are: 1. On [DATE] at 5:57 PM, two surveyors entered the medication room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 4. The facility narcotic box was easily removed from the refrigerator and placed upon the counter. LPN #4 was asked to unlock the narcotic box. Inside the box were two vials of Ativan 2 milligrams per millimeter (mg/ml) that were prescribed to a resident that had expired, as well as five syringes and two vials of Ativan injectables, 2 mg/ml, intended for facility use. a. On [DATE] at 6:15 PM, two surveyors accompanied by LPN #4 observed a vial of multi-use vial Tuberculin with no opened date, lot…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a multi-resident use glucometer was disinfected after use to prevent potential spread of infection for 1 (Resident #45) who had physician orders for capillary blood glucose (CBG) monitoring. The findings are: 1. Review of an Order Summary Report revealed Resident #45 had a diagnosis of type II diabetes mellitus and a physician's order for a fast-acting insulin to be administered according to a sliding scale (The term sliding scale refers to the progressive increase in the pre-meal or nighttime insulin dose, based on pre-defined blood glucose ranges, and is dependent on CBG monitoring). 2. On 05/15/2024 at 7:36 AM, during an observation of medication administration Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 performed a blood glucose test on Resident #45. LPN #1 took the glucometer out of a medication cart drawer and then took it to Resident #45's room and performed a CBG test (CBG testing uses a drop of blood from a finger prick to get a blood glucose reading using a blood glucose meter, or glucometer). LPN#1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0882 — pattern
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that an Infection Preventionist was employed by the facility during the time frame of 01/02/2024 to 02/08/2024 in which a COVID-19 outbreak occurred. The findings are: On 05/15/2024 at 10:05 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked who the Infection Preventionist (IP) during the COVID-19 outbreak in January 2024. The DON said it was another nurse but they quit either during or before the COVID-19 outbreak. The DON was asked how long the facility operated without an IP. The DON said the facility did not have an IP for roughly a month. The surveyor asked how the COVID-19 outbreak was handled with no IP. The DON reported they (the DON) looked at the policies and procedures and ensured that infection control was followed during the outbreak. The DON reported they did not have an IP license or certification. On 05/15/2024 at 2:00 PM, the Administrator was asked to describe the importance of having a trained and certified IP. The Administrator stated it is a requirement.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a residents expressed preference for having their bed made was honored for one (Resident #32) sampled resident. The findings are: Review of an Order Summary Report revealed Resident #32 had diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus and bipolar disorder. On the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/29/24 Resident #32 received a score of 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). On 05/13/24 at 02:23 PM, Resident #32 was observed sitting in his/her room adjacent to the bed. During discussion Resident #32 expressed a preference for his/her bed to be made each day. Resident #32 described feeling as if the certified nursing assistants (CNA's) ignore the unmade bed due to their being short staffed. Resident #32 reported that their bed is frequently unmade. On 05/15/24 at 08:57 AM, Resident #32 reported that his/her bed has not been made this week. When asked if he/she has requested that the bed be made the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment; food items stored in the refrigerator /freezer were covered, sealed and dated; expired food items were promptly removed/discarded by the expiration or use by dates; foods were dated when received or opened to assure first in first out usage and hot foods on the steam table were maintained at or above 135 degrees Fahrenheit while awaiting service, to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. The failed practices had the potential to affect 44 residents who received meals from the kitchen (total census: 45), as documented on a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 03/07/23 and the findings are: 1. On 03/06/23 at 9:45 AM., Dietary Employee #1 turned on the faucet in the dish washing room and washed his hands. He turned the faucet off with his bare hands, picked up plates and placed them on the shelf with his fingers inside of the plates. The Surveyor asked, What should you have done after touching dirty…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $837K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR