Katherine's Place at Wedington

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 113 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 103.6 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.81 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.40 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, document review the facility failed to provide incontinent care during an eight-hour shift for one resident (Resident #30) of four residents reviewed for neglect. The findings include: Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with assessment reference date of 08/08/2025, revealed that Resident #30 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 14, which indicated that Resident #30 was cognitively intact. The MDS also revealed that Resident #30 required substantial to maximal assistance with toileting hygiene. A review of Care Plan for Resident #30 with initiation date of 02/26/2025 indicated that staff should anticipate and meet the resident's needs. The Care Plan included an intervention with an initiation date of 02/08/2025, for staff to keep Resident #30's skin clean and dry. During an interview with Resident #30 on 09/03/2025 at 2:52 PM, it was revealed that Resident #30's brief was not checked or changed during a night shift back in July. Resident #30 stated that The day shift Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) came in and found me in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure good hand hygiene was maintained for 1(Resident #54) of 2 sampled (Resident #54 and Resident #101) residents observed during perineal care and reviewed for bowel and bladder. The findings include: Review of a Medical Diagnosis report revealed Resident #54 had diagnoses which included inflammation and swelling of the kidney, urinary tract infection, and inability to voluntarily move the upper and lower body. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 08/19/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3, which indicated Resident #54 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #54 was always incontinent with bowel and stool. Review of a Care Plan revealed Resident #54 had bowel incontinence related to advanced disease process and decreased mobility with interventions in place to check the resident every two hours and assist with toileting needs. The Care Plan also indicated to provide perineal care after each…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report to the State Licensing Agency an incident of resident allegation of verbal abuse for one (Resident #5) resident of five residents reviewed for abuse. The findings are: A review of facility policy Abuse Investigations and Reporting revealed that all allegations would be reported immediately, but not later than two hours of allegation of abuse to the State Licensing/Certification Agency. A review of admission Record revealed Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE], with medical diagnoses which included: acute congested heart failure, high blood pressure, muscle wasting and atrophy, and difficulty walking. A review of Resident #5 ' s annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/13/25, revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated no cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed Resident #5 had adequate hearing, used a mobility device (wheelchair), required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands and changed their gloves before handling food items to prevent the potential for cross contamination for the residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen, the failed practice had the potential to affect 103 residents who received meals from the Kitchen (Total Census: 104). The findings are: 1. On 05/14/2024 at 04:50 PM, the following meat items stored on a shelf in the freezer were not covered or sealed: a. Box of steak finger patties. b. A box of pork rib patties. 2. On 05/14/2024 at 05:16 PM, there was an opened cup from a restaurant that contained chocolate shake in the freezer with a received date of 05/14/2024, exposing it to air and or potential for cross contamination. 3. On 05/15/2024 at 08:07 AM, DE #2, who was on the tray line assisting with breakfast meal, was observed to pick up condiments and place them on the trays. Without washing his hands, he picked plates and placed them on the trays to be used in portioning food items to be served to the residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to initiate care areas and interventions on the resident care plan for oxygen usage and physician's orders for high risk medications for 3 (Resident #13, Resident #15, and Resident #99) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care plans and interventions. Findings include: 1. A review of an Order Summary indicated the facility admitted Resident #13 with diagnoses that included atherosclerotic heart disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/23/2024 revealed Resident #13 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. This MDS indicated that Resident #13 had received insulin injections for the past 7 days and was taking an anticoagulant. B. A review of Resident #13's Care Plan on 05/15/24 at 10:22 AM revealed that this resident's care plan did not address anticoagulant use and insulin use. C. A review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to revise the resident care plan to reflect current physician orders for 3 (Resident #13, Resident #15, and Resident #46) of 3 residents reviewed for care plan revision. Findings include: 1. A review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/23/2024 revealed Resident #13 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively Intact. This MDS indicated that Resident #13 is prescribed opioids. B. A review of Resident #13's Care Plan revised, revealed the resident was on pain medication therapy (Tramadol) the interventions included ask physician to review medication if side effects persist. Dated 01/24/2024. C. A review of Resident #13's Order Summary revealed Resident #13 had a Physician's order for, Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Oral Tablet 5-325 milligram, give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physicians order for wound care was following during a scheduled dressing change for 2 (Resident #4 and Resident #32) of 2 residents reviewed for wound care management. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #4's Order Summary Report indicated Resident #4 did not have a medical diagnosis for the wound care received. a. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/11/2024, revealed Resident #4 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The MDS did not indicate the presence of a current pressure ulcer. b. A review of Resident #4's Care Plan revealed the resident had a pressure ulcer of the left heel related to immobility. Interventions included wound/dressing changes as ordered on Treatment Administration Record (TAR). c. A review of Resident #4's Order Summary Report revealed Resident #4 had an order for L [left] heel ST3 [Stage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a method that maintained the appearance of cold product and at temperatures that were acceptable to the residents to improve palatability and encourage good nutritional intake during 1 of 1 meal observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 11 residents who receive meal trays in their rooms on the 100 Hall, 8 residents who receive meal trays on the 200 Hall, 13 residents who receive meal trays in their room on the 300 Hall, 5 residents who receive meal trays in their room on 400 Hall, 25 residents who receive meal trays in their room on the 500 Hall, and 6 residents who receive meal trays in their room on the 600 Hall. The findings are: 1. On 05/15/2024 at 12:17 PM, an unheated food cart that contained 11 trays for lunch was delivered to the 100 Hall by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2. At 12:39 PM, immediately after the last resident was served in their room on the 100 Hall, the temperature of the food items on the tray used as a test tray was taken and read by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for those residents who required pureed diets for 2 of 2 meals observed. The failed practice had the potential to affect 9 residents who received pureed diets. The findings are: 1. On 05/14/2024 at 04:47 PM, Dietary Employee (DE) #1 placed 11 dinner rolls into a blender, added whole milk and pureed. DE #1 poured the pureed bread into a pan and placed it in the oven. The consistency of the pureed bread was lumpy and not smooth. 2. On 05/14/2024 at 04:59 PM, the following observations were made on the steam table before meal service: a. A pan of pureed vegetables. The consistency of the pureed vegetables was not formed and was running. b. A pan of pureed beef steak fingers. The consistency of the meat was lumpy and not smooth. There were pieces of meat visible in the mixture. 3. On 05/14/2024 at 05:34 PM, the Surveyor asked the Dietary Supervisor to describe the consistency of the pureed food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed before and during wound care to maintain aseptic technique throughout wound care, ensure no cross contamination of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and during wound bed cleansing for 2 (Resident #4 and Resident #32) of 2 residents reviewed for wound care. Findings include: 1. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/11/2024 revealed Resident #4 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. a. A review of Resident #4's Care Plan revealed the resident had a pressure ulcer of the left heel related to immobility. Interventions included wound/dressing changes as ordered on the on Treatment Administration Record (TAR). b. A review of Resident #4's Order Summary Report revealed Resident #4 had an order for a left heel stage 3 pressure ulcer to be cleaned and dressed every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. c. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR