Bella Vita Health and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 126 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 159.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-11-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, facility documentation, policy review, and the State Agency complaint tracking system, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#1) was not neglected by failing to assess and meet their basic needs to prevent the development of a Stage 3 pressure ulcer and Deep Tissue Injury (DTI). The deficient practice could result in the residents' development of pressure ulcers and deep tissue injuries.Findings include:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus (DM) Type 2, Schizophrenia, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, and Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) with a left-sided weakness.On May 9, 2025, a Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk assessment was completed, and the resident's score was 10.0, high risk.A review of a document, Skin Evaluation-PRN/Weekly, dated May 10, 2025, revealed an initial admission skin evaluation by a wound nurse. The skin evaluation revealed the resident's bilateral feet were dry and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and residents interviews, review of clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to protect a resident's (#2) right to be free from verbal abuse from a staff member for one of eleven sampled residents. The deficient practice could result in psychosocial harm to the resident.-Findings include:-Regarding Resident #2:Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, anxiety disorder, depression, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and epilepsy.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Additionally, Section C-Cognitive patterns revealed Resident #2 had no inattention, disorganized thinking, or altered level of consciousness. Section E-Behavior revealed the resident had no hallucinations or delusions.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, hospital discharge documentation review, staff interviews, and review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (#16) of three sampled residents by failing to implement and coordinate physician-directed oncology follow-up appointments identified on the hospital discharge plan. The deficient practice had the potential to result in delayed evaluation, diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of the resident's medical condition.Findings include:Hospital discharge documentation dated May 3, 2026, revealed Resident #16 had a scheduled oncology laboratory appointment on May 5, 2026, at 9:30 a.m. and a scheduled oncology follow-up appointment with his oncologist on May 8, 2026, at 9:00 a.m.Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included acute on chronic systolic congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, staff interviews, review of facility documentation, policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that one resident's (#911) injury of unknown origin was reported to the state agency. The deficient practice could result in injury of unknown origin not being reviewed for potential abuse.Findings include: Resident #911 (alleged victim) was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, borderline personality disorder, anxiety disorder, age-related cognitive decline, and depression. Review of a care plan initiated on October 26, 2024 revealed that the resident is on anticoagulant therapy. Interventions indicated to monitor/document/report to MD (Medical Doctor) PRN (Pro Re Nata = as needed) signs/symptoms of anticoagulant complications such as bruising, and to monitor/document location, size and treatment of skin injury. A care plan pertaining to resident's impaired thought process/dementia, and cognitive-loss initiated October 26,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-29 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that the receiving facility was provided the required documentation pertaining to one resident's (#911) transfer/discharge. The deficient practice could lead to the receiving facility not having the appropriate information regarding the resident's medical status and cause a delay in treatment/care.Findings include: Resident #911 (alleged victim) was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, borderline personality disorder, anxiety disorder, age-related cognitive decline, and depression. Review of a care plan initiated on October 26, 2024 revealed that the resident is on anticoagulant therapy. Interventions indicated to monitor/document/report to MD (Medical Doctor) PRN (Pro Re Nata = as needed) signs/symptoms of anticoagulant complications such as bruising, and to monitor/document location, size and treatment of skin injury. A care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0660 — pattern
  Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident/resident representative interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident and resident ' s representatives were a part of the discharge/transfer process for 4 of 5 sampled residents (#21, #32, #16 and #14). Findings include: -Regarding Resident #21 Resident #21 was originally admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy, functional quadriplegia, tourettes and dysphagia. Review of the resident ' s care plan dated February 19, 2017 indicated that the resident did not have an active discharge plan and wished to remain in the facility for long term care (LTC). There were no additions or corrections made to the care plan until the cancellation due to the resident ' s discharge date d March 3, 2025. Review of the clinical record revealed a notice of proposed transfer/discharge document dated February 28, 2025 indicating that the resident ' s niece/representative was notified. There were no prior indications of discharge planning. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident/resident representative interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents and/or the resident's representative (RR) were notified in writing of transfer to another facility for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#21, and #14). Failure of notification had the potential to affect the resident and their RR by not having clear knowledge of where and why the resident was transferred. Findings include: -Regarding Resident #21 Resident #21 was originally admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy, functional quadriplegia, tourettes and dysphagia. Review of the clinical record revealed a notice of proposed transfer/discharge document dated February 28, 2025 indicating that the resident ' s niece/representative was notified. There were no prior indications of discharge planning. Review of the resident ' s care plan dated February 19, 2017 indicated that the resident did not have an active discharge plan and wished to remain in the facility for long…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident/resident representative interviews, clinical record and policy review the facility failed to ensure that two resident 's (#214 and #525) were free from abuse. The deficient practice may result in physical and/or psychosocial harm to the residents. Findings include: Resident #214 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on January 21, 2024 with diagnosis including unilateral primary osteoarthritis of left hip, other intervertebral disc disorders of lumbar region, pain in left hip, and muscle weakness. Review of the incident report dated January 15, 2024 revealed Resident #214 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 14 indicating no cognitive impairment. The care-plan initiated on January 18, 2024 revealed that Resident #214 was at risk for impaired thought process related to new environment. The goal was that resident will maintain current level of cognitive function through the review date. Interventions included - monitor/observe resident for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of transfer/discharge for one resident (#163). Failure to notify Ombudsman of transfers/discharges may result in residents being discharged against their will. Findings include: Resident # 163 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses including acute kidney failure, Gastro-Esophageal reflex, and multiple fractures of the ribs. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. admission transfer/discharge reports dated July 2024 revealed no evidence that resident (#163) had been listed as discharged . A Care plan dated July 29, 2024 revealed a focus that the resident is to return or be discharged to an alternative placement. A progress note dated July 30, 2024 revealed that the resident was transferred to a rehabilitation facility via stretcher. A physician's order dated July 30, 204 revealed an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#320) was provided assistance with showering and dressing. This deficient practice could result in residents not being provided appropriate hygiene care and services. Findings include: Resident #320 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle weakness (generalized), hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the care plan dated October 24, 2024 revealed the resident had activities of daily living (ADL) performance deficit related to general weakness, impaired mobility, history of multiple strokes, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation with pacemaker. Review of the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) bathing task log revealed no evidence that the resident had received a shower from admission on [DATE] to October 30, 2024. The task log revealed one entry of a refusal of a shower on October 28, 2024. Review of the shower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a blood pressure medication was administered within ordered parameters for one resident (# 60). Findings Include: Resident # 60 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dependence on hemodialysis, hypotension, hypothyroidism, muscle weakness, and unspecified issues of the musculoskeletal system. Review of the admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The care plan for hypotension-initiated January 3, 2024, revealed for staff to monitor, and record vital signs, and to report any significant abnormalities to the physician (MD). A medication order for Midodrine HCL 5 mg was initiated on January 30, 2024 for three tablets to be administered with meals for hypotension (low blood pressure), but to hold the dose if the systolic blood pressure was greater than 130.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-11-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ