No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aspen Health And Wellness

6501 W 75th Street, Overland Park, KS 66204 · For profit - Corporation · 102 certified beds · (913) 367-1906 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (913) 367-1906 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 actual-harm citations$92,612 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $92,612 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-13)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
7501 Metcalf Ave · (913) 642-6330 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7501 Metcalf Ave · (913) 642-6330 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7000 W 75th St · (913) 432-1107 · Call to confirm hours
Park
7326 Outlook St · (913) 327-6630 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
6709 W 75th St · (913) 735-4304

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.0%17.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.0%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.1%6.5%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.4%4.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.8%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.6%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.5%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.3%4.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.3%22.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.8%18.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.0%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.5%22.4%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit0.0%11.5%12.0%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.951.801.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.912.131.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
80.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.40U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 80.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.4%CMS range 30.8–52.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 7.4–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge80.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified70.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.2%CMS range 4.5–12.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.981.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.70
RN hours/ resident / day
0.59
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.38
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.66
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
55.6%
Total nursing turnover
53.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 79.6 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-26)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2023-10-19)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for weight loss. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent further weight loss for Resident (R) 1 after she experienced a significant weight loss, and the facility implemented an initial intervention in September 2024. R1 continued to experience significant weight loss and Consultant GG followed R1 but did not recommend further interventions to prevent weight loss and the facility failed to implement further weight loss prevention interventions. This deficient practice resulted in a significant weight loss of 25.6% for R1. Findings included: - R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of generalized muscle weakness, mild intellectual abilities, cognitive communication deficit, need for assistance with personal care, and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-07-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 83 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent an incident of resident-to-resident sexual abuse when Resident (R) 1, who had a history of inappropriate sexual behaviors with a recent escalation, exposed his genitals to R2, a cognitively impaired resident unable to consent. This deficient practice resulted in a negative reaction from R2 and placed the residents at risk for impaired psychosocial well-being including fear and embarrassment, and risk for ongoing sexual abuse. Findings Included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive behavior (OCD - an anxiety disorder characterized by recurrent and persistent thoughts, ideas and feelings of obsessions severe to cause marked distress, consume considerable time or significantly interfere with the resident's occupational, social or interpersonal functioning), unspecified dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 79 residents. The sample included three residents with two reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident can 1 remained free from accidents when Certified Nurse Aide can (CNA) M propelled R1 down the hallway in her wheelchair, without a foot pedal for her right leg/foot. This caused R1's foot to get stuck under the wheelchair and resulted in a fracture (broken bone) to her right leg. The facility further failed to prevent accidents for R2 when CNA N failed to utilize two people with a Hoyer lift (total body mechanical lift) transfer which resulted in R2 slipping out of the lift sling and landing on the floor. This deficient practice placed R2 at risk for injuries and physical complications. Findings included: - The Diagnoses of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of acquired absence of left leg above knee, other abnormalities of gait (manner or style of walk) and mobility, and generalized muscle weakness. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 05/02/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to ensure adequate resident care and call light response. This placed the facility residents at risk for a decline and inadequate resident care being completed. Findings Included: - A review of the facility's Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ -Staffing Data Report) from 04/01/22 through 03/31/25 indicated the facility triggered for One Star Staffing for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 Quarter Three 04/01/24-06/30/24), FY 2024 Quarter Four (07/01/24-09/30/24), FY 2025 Quarter One (10/01/24-12/31/24), and FY 2025 Quarter Two (01/01/25-03/31/25). The Resident Council Minutes for 04/14/25 noted concerns that residents were not getting their showers completed on their assigned shower days. The form noted the residents were being told: Staff were too busy to give a shower. The form's response section indicated the shower schedules were reviewed to verify preferences due to discrepancies between preferences and scheduled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The facility identified fifteen residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure trash was stored and contained properly. The facility further failed to ensure that catheter bags were kept off the floor. The facility further failed to ensure that respiratory equipment, such as a BIPAP (a type of noninvasive ventilation used to assist breathing) mask, a nebulizer (a device that changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) mask, and a nasal cannula, was stored in a sanitary manner. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Findings included: - An initial walkthrough of the facility was completed on 06/24/25 at 07:05 AM. Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) O was dragging a large white trash bag with trash, and a large white trash bag of laundry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement the core elements of antibiotic stewardship to ensure an effective infection prevention and control program, including antibiotic stewardship for the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Review of the Infection Control Log for tracking and trending infections from May 2024 through May 2025, lacked evidence of trending organism identifications in December 2024, January 2025, and February 2025. The facility was unable to provide evidence of trending upon request. A review of Resident (R) 34's Electronic Medical Record EMR documented Ciprofloxacin (antibiotic medication) HCL ophthalmic (eye) solution, installed two drops in both eyes three times a day for bacterial conjunctivitis (infection of the eye) for seven days, dated 06/01/25. A review of R12's EMR documented Ofloxacin (antibiotic) ophthalmic solution instilled two drops in both eyes four times a day for conjunctivitis/blepharitis (eye and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 58. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to resolve recurring issues reported by the Resident Council. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings Included: - A review of the facility's Resident Council Minutes from 06/24 through 06/25 indicated the council had recurring concerns with the food choices, menus, temperatures, and availability. The minutes also noted concerns related to maintaining and cleaning the shower rooms. The Resident Council Minutes for 07/22/24 noted under new business concerns, facility staff were not following the resident bathing schedules. The minutes indicated staff would walk into the room, turn off the call light, and exit the room. The form's staff response indicated staff were educated on following the shower schedule and call light response. The Resident Council Minutes for 08/12/24 noted under new business concerns that facility staff were still not following the resident's bathing schedule. The Resident Council Minutes for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide direct, interactive activities based on resident preferences for the residents on weekends. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being, boredom, and isolation. Findings Included: - A review of the facility's Activity Calendars for March 2024, April 2025, May 2025, and June 2025 was completed. A review of Sunday for the majority of each month revealed the residents were only offered a self-led activity packet for an activity. On 06/25/24 at 02:00 PM, the facility's Resident Council reported that the weekend activities were inconsistent with what was scheduled. The council reported on Sunday's the residents did not always receive staff-led activities. The council stated they were often offered puzzles or packets to complete individually. The council reported that the facility was often short-staffed on Sundays. They stated the activities staff did not work on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    - R12's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), muscle weakness, depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and need for assistance with personal hygiene. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 08/07/24 documented R12 moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R12 had an indwelling catheter. The MDS documented R12 was dependent on staff assistance for toileting and bathing. The MDS documented R12 had one non-injury fall during the observation period. The Quarterly MDS dated 05/06/24 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented that R12 had a limited range of motion (ROM - the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R12's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), muscle weakness, depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and need for assistance with personal hygiene. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 08/07/24 documented R12 moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R12 had an indwelling catheter. The MDS documented R12 was dependent on staff assistance for toileting and bathing. The MDS documented R12 had one non-injury fall during the observation period. The Quarterly MDS dated 05/06/24 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented that R12 had a limited range of motion (ROM - the full…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to include Resident (R) 34 or her representative in the development and planning of the resident's care plan. This deficient practice placed R34 at risk of impaired care and decreased autonomy. Findings included: - R34's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), and aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 02/12/25 documented R34 had severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R34 had received hospice services during the observation period. The Quarterly MDS dated 05/13/25 documented R34 had severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R34 had received hospice services during the observation period. R34's Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 02/17/25 documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 3 had been assessed for the ability to self-administer her physician-ordered Voltaren gel (a pain-relieving gel). This placed R3 at risk of unsafe medication administration and adverse effects. Findings included: - R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of embolism (an obstruction in a blood vessel due to a blood clot or other foreign matter that gets stuck while traveling through the bloodstream) of the deep veins of the right lower extremity, malignant neoplasm (an abnormal growth of cells that has the potential to invade and destroy nearby tissues or spread to distant parts of the body) of the breast, diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage caused by diabetes, often leading to pain, numbness, and tingling, particularly in the hands and feet). R3's Annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Three residents were sampled for reasonable accommodations of needs. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 13, R12, and R57 call lights were within their reach. This deficient practice left R13, R12, and R57 vulnerable to unmet care needs due to the inability to call for staff assistance. Findings Included: - On 06/24/25 at 07:00 AM, an inspection of R13's (vulnerable resident unable to self-transfer) laid on her bed, R13's call light lay on the over-the-bed table. R13's over-the-bed table was pushed away from her. She was unable to reach her call light. On 06/24/25 at 07:40 AM, R12 (a cognitively impaired, unable to transfer herself) was asleep on the bed with her lower extremities off to the left side of the bed. R12's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag with dark amber urine laid directly on the floor facing the entrance door to the room. R12's call bell was on the bedside table, which was out of her reach. On 06/25/25 at 07:18 AM, R57…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with three residents reviewed for hospitalization and/or discharge. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 19 and his representative were provided with a bed hold policy that included the facility's per diem rate to hold a bed. The facility failed to ensure R19, and his representative was provided a written notification of transfer upon his transfer to the hospital. The facility failed to ensure that a discharge summary and a recapitulation of stay were completed upon R61's discharge from the facility. This placed R19 and R61 at risk of miscommunication between the facility and the resident's representative, and the possible missed opportunity for healthcare services. Findings included: - R19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN- elevated blood pressure), cirrhosis (chronic degenerative disease of the liver) of the liver, carcinoma…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with two residents reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to identify a significant change in the physical condition and complete a comprehensive Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident (R) 34 with the discharge from hospice services. This deficient practice placed R34 at risk for unidentified care needs. Findings included: - R34's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), and aphasia (a condition with disordered or absent language function). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 02/12/25 documented R34 had severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R34 had received hospice services during the observation period. The Quarterly MDS dated 05/13/25 documented R34 had severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R34 had received hospice services during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 3's Care Plan had been revised to direct staff that she was safe to self-administer her physician-ordered Voltaren gel (a pain-relieving gel). This placed R3 at risk of unsafe medication administration and adverse effects. Findings included: - R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of embolism (an obstruction in a blood vessel due to a blood clot or other foreign matter that gets stuck while traveling through the bloodstream) of the deep veins of the right lower extremity, malignant neoplasm (an abnormal growth of cells that has the potential to invade and destroy nearby tissues or spread to distant parts of the body) of the breast, diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage caused by diabetes, often leading to pain, numbness, and tingling, particularly in the hands…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    - R12's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), muscle weakness, depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and need for assistance with personal hygiene. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 08/07/24 documented R12 moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R12 had an indwelling catheter. The MDS documented R12 was dependent on staff assistance for toileting and bathing. The MDS documented R12 had one non-injury fall during the observation period. The Quarterly MDS dated 05/06/24 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented that R12 had a limited range of motion (ROM - the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with one resident reviewed for quality of care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for weights to monitor for edema and fluid overload for Resident (R) 52. This deficient practice placed R52 at risk for delay in treatment related to fluid overload and untreated illness. Findings included: - R52's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), hypotension (low blood pressure), edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), muscle weakness, unsteady on her feet, and the need for assistance with personal care. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 07/12/24 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R52 had received antidepressant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with three residents reviewed for treatment/services to prevent/heal pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure pressure-reducing measures were placed on Resident (R)13. This placed R13 at increased risk for pressure ulcer development. Findings Included: - R13's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of malnutrition, epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures), adult failure to thrive, cognitive communication deficit (difficulties with communication that arise from impairments in cognitive processes like attention, memory and executive functions), cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), encounter for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 25's Bilevel positive airway pressure (noninvasive ventilation used to assist breathing) mask, nebulizer (a device that changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) mask and nasal cannula (a medical device that delivers supplemental oxygen or other therapeutic gases to a patient through two small, flexible tubes inserted into the nostrils) was stored in a sanitary manner. This placed R25 at an increased risk for respiratory infection and complications. Findings included: - R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure, obstructive sleep apnea (an open airway during typical breathing during sleep and a blocked airway), pulmonary edema (accumulation of extravascular fluid in the lung…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consulting Pharmacists (CP) identified when staff administered R52's midodrine (a medication used to treat low blood pressure) outside the physician-ordered parameters. This placed R52 at risk for unnecessary medication administration and related complications. Findings included: - R52's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), hypotension (low blood pressure), edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), Muscle weakness, unsteady on her feet, and the need for assistance with personal care. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 07/12/24 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R52 had received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    - R52's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), hypotension (low blood pressure), edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), muscle weakness, unsteady on her feet, and the need for assistance with personal care. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 07/12/24 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R52 had received antidepressant (a class of medications used to treat mood disorders) medication, diuretic (a medication to promote the formation and excretion of urine) medication, and hypnotic (a class of medications used to induce sleep) medication during the observation period. The Quarterly MDS dated 03/24/25 documented a BIMS score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented that R52 had received diuretic medication, antidepressant medication, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    - R34's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), and aphasia (a condition with disordered or absent language function). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 02/12/25 documented R34 had severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R34 had received hospice services during the observation period. The Quarterly MDS dated 05/13/25 documented R34 had severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R34 had received hospice services during the observation period. R34's Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 02/17/25, documented she had received hospice services for additional supportive care. R34's Care Plan, dated 09/12/24, documented the facility would work cooperatively with hospice team to ensure her spiritual, emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs were met. R34's EMR under the Orders tab revealed the following physician orders: Admit to hospice services with the diagnosis of senile…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-12 · tag F0941 — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 77 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an agency nurse, Licensed Nurse (LN) G, had the required effective communication education. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for impaired communication with LN G. Findings included: - In a Grievance/Complain Report dated 02/29/24, Resident (R) 1's family stated she felt R1 was not being cared for appropriately. When she arrived on 02/28/24, R1 was lying in bed with a brief on, no incontinence pad, and a brown stain on the sheet. R1's family asked staff to change R1 and staff stated they were giving a bed bath. R1's family requested again and staff stated R1 had to wait until help came. R1's family stated she told staff they were not going to talk to her like that and that they were neglecting R1. LN G came into R1's room and pulled the privacy curtain. R1's family stated LN G loudly and rudely stated staff were done with R1's family. Upon request, the facility was unable to provide documentation that LN G completed education on effective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-12 · tag F0942 — pattern
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 77 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an agency nurse, Licensed Nurse (LN) G, had the required resident rights education. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for impaired resident rights. Findings included: - In a Grievance/Complain Report dated 02/29/24, Resident (R) 1's family stated she felt R1 was not being cared for appropriately. When she arrived on 02/28/24, R1 was lying in bed with a brief on, no incontinence pad, and a brown stain on the sheet. R1's family asked staff to change R1 and staff stated they were giving a bed bath. R1's family requested again and staff stated R1 had to wait until help came. R1's family stated she told staff they were not going to talk to her like that and that they were neglecting R1. LN G came into R1's room and pulled the privacy curtain. R1's family stated LN G loudly and rudely stated staff were done with R1's family. Upon request, the facility was unable to provide documentation that LN G completed education on resident rights before she started…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-19 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure five of five nurse aides, reviewed for regular in-service education, completed an annual performance review. This placed the residents at risk for unskilled care. Findings included: - Review of Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M, CNA N, CNA P, CNA Q, and Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R's in-service records lacked evidence of an annual performance review. On 10/19/23 at 09:19 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the lack of documentation indicating the above staff received an annual performance review. Upon request the facility did not provide a policy regarding CNA/CMA annual performance review. The facility failed to ensure CNA M, CNA N, CNA P, CNA Q, and CMA R completed an annual performance review. This placed the residents at risk for unskilled care.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-19 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 75 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ) as required. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing inadequate nurse staffing. Findings included: - The PBJ report provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services PBJ Staffing Data Report CASPER Report 1705D FY Quarter 3 2023 (April 1 - June 30) documented the facility failed to report their PBJ data for Quarter 3 2023. On 10/17/23 at 02:42 PM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility had not reported the PBJ for Quarter 3 2023 and stated they had a payroll company who was suppose to send PBJ, but they failed to report it. Administrative Staff A stated PBJ should be sent to CMS quarterly and he would be reporting it from now on. The facility's Electronic Staffing Data Submission-Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) policy, revised 04/01/23, documented staffing and census data would be collected quarterly and was required to be timely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-19 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the required committee members attended the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee quarterly meetings. This failure placed the residents who resided in the facility at risk for decreased quality of care. Findings included: - On 10/19/23 at 09:40 AM, the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting attendance sheets lacked signature the infection preventionist (IP) attended the meetings. On 10/19/23 at 09:50 AM, Administrative Staff A verified the quarterly sign in sheets lacked an infection preventionist signature and stated the facility did not have a designated IP. The facility's QAPI Plan, revised 5/31/23, documented the QAPI committee provides the backbone and structure for QAPI. This group includes the executive leadership team including Administrator, Director of Nursing Services, Medical Director, consulting pharmacist, infection control preventionist, plus 3 additional staff members. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    - On 10/17/23 at 08:35 AM, observation revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) H performed wound care for Resident (R) 5. He placed wound care items on a clean field on the bedside table. LN H provided urine incontinence care for R5 and after placing a new brief on R5, he changed his gloves without washing his hands. The pressure wound to R5's coccyx (triangular area at the base of the spine) was without a dressing; LN H cleansed the wound and, without washing hands or changing gloves, applied Skin-prep (liquid skin protectant), Santyl (a prescription enzyme used to help break up and remove dead skin and tissue of a wound), a collagen (protein derived wound treatment used to promote wound healing) patch, then applied a bordered foam dressing. On 10/18/23 at 09:24 AM, LN H verified he should have washed his hands between removing the soiled dressing and before applying the clean wound dressings. On 10/18/23 at 09:30 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified she expected staff to wash their hands after handling soiled items. The facility's Dressings, Dry/Clean policy, dated 2013, directed staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-19 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a designated Infection Preventionist (IP) as required. This placed the residents in the facility at increased risk for infection and related complications. Findings included: - On 10/17/23 at 03:07PM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility did not employ an IP. The facility's Infection Preventionist policy, dated 09/2023, stated the infection preventionist is responsible for coordinating, implementing and updating of the infection prevention and control program. Monitors changes in infection prevention and control guidelines and regulations to ensure that policies, practices, and protocols remain current and aid in preventing and controlling the spread of infections. A nurse must of earned a certificate for specialized training in infection control, and work at least part time in the facility. The facility failed to employ an IP as required placing the residents who reside in the facility at increased risk for infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-19 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 75 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure three of five Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) completed their required 12-hour annual in-services. This placed the residents at risk for receiving unskilled care. Findings included: - On 10/22/23 at 8:00 AM, review of CNA M, CNA N, and Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R annual in-service hours lacked evidence the staff had the required 12 hours of in-service training. On 10/19/23 at 09:19, Administrative Nurse D verified the facility lacked documentation the above staff completed their required 12-hour in-services. The Facility Assessment Tool, revised 09/15/23, documented staff would be provided education and training by multiple means which included online education monthly and as needed staff in-services. The tool documented staff would receive education upon hire and reviewed at least annually. The facility's In-Service Training, Nurse Aide Policy, revised August 2022, documented the facility would complete a performance review of nurse aides every 12 months. Annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, home like environment when the lights in the dining room were nonfunctioning, the light fixtures contained dead insects, and the dining chairs were stained and had food particles. This placed the residents at risk for decreased comfort and impaired psychosocial wellbeing. Findings included: - On 10/16/23 at 11:59 AM, observation in the main dining room revealed the following: The fluorescent light, approximately three feet (ft) long by 18 inches wide, had nonfunctioning bulbs, on the ceiling above the dining room door where the STOP sign was posted. Two ceiling fluorescent light fixtures, close to the kitchen entrance. had nonfunctioning light bulbs. On 10/16/23 at 12:00PM, observation of the main dining room revealed the following: The sink countertop edge lacked a piece of laminate trim approximately two feet wide by 4 inches wide, showing the rough wood. The countertop had another piece of laminated trim missing in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to discuss with the resident council how to file a grievance regarding their care and treatment in the facility. This deficient practice placed the residents in the facility at risk for unresolved resident concerns and decreased quality of life. Findings included: - On 10/16/23 at 11:45AM, during observation in the main dining room, 34 residents sat in wheelchairs or dining chairs at the tables. Further observation revealed at 12:40PM, residents continued to sit in the dining room and no noon meal had been served yet. On 10/16/23 at 11:57AM, observation at the rehab dining room revealed no hot meal cart had been delivered for the rehab dining room or room trays. At 12:00PM, dietary staff delivered the food cart to the hall beside the rehab dining room and left it. At 12:24 PM, observation revealed a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) opened the meal cart and served meals in the rehab dining room. On 10/17/23 at 02:00PM, during private…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 75 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label insulin (hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) when opened and dispose of expired medications in a timely manner. This deficient practice placed residents of the facility at risk to receive expired or ineffective medications. Findings included: - On 10/16/23 at 11:40 AM, observation revealed the southwest nurse's medication cart contained the following medications: Naproxen (pain reliever), 220 milligram (mg) a partial bottle, with an expiration date of 09/23. Insulin glargine (long acting insulin) opened 09/12/23 (33 days ago). Insulin glargine not dated when opened. Nicotine gum, 2 mg, expired 07/23/20. On 10/16/23 at 11:45 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) E verified the expired medications should have been disposed of and staff were to date insulins when opened. The facility's Storage of Medications policy, dated 04/01/23, stated discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated medications will be destroyed according to the facility policy. Multi dose vials…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 75 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store foods and monitor refrigeration temperatures for the resident food storage in the nourishment rooms in accord with professional standards for food safety. This deficient practice placed the residents who received food from or stored their food in the nourishment refrigerators on two of two resident halls at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: - On 10/18/23 at 02:58 PM, observation revealed the nourishment room on the west hall had a refrigerator with a temperature of 39 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Inside the refrigerator was one bag of frozen food, unlabeled or dated; one partially eaten, unlabeled, pint of ice cream; one pizza box, not dated; two 32-ounce undated bottles of prune juice; one-half bottle of cherry soda, unlabeled or dated; one McDonalds bag with food dated 10/15, and one container of chicken rice soup, undated. On 10/18/23 at 03:35 PM, observation of the nourishment refrigerator on the east hall revealed the refrigerator temperature of 45…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0920 — pattern
    Provide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide adequate lighting in the main dining room. This placed the residents at risk for impaired quality of life. Findings Included: - On 10/16/23 at 11:59 AM, observation in the main dining room revealed the following: The fluorescent light, approximately three feet (ft) long by 18 inches wide, had nonfunctioning bulbs, on the ceiling above the dining room door where the STOP sign was posted. Two ceiling fluorescent light fixtures, close to the kitchen entrance. had nonfunctioning light bulbs. On 10/18/23 at 10:15 AM, Maintenance Staff (MS) U verified the above findings and stated he became employed with the facility in August 2023 and he was trying to catch up with work orders but was unaware of the light fixture bulbs being burned out or needing cleaned. MS U stated staff were to leave a work order for him on the facility maintenance computer program if they had any environmental issues, and he tried to make rounds every day to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation and record review the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment, when six fluorescent ceiling light fixtures had numerous bugs, the sink counter top edge had missing pieces of laminate in the main dining room, and chairs in the rehabilitation dining room had stains and food particles three days of the onsite survey. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of care and life. Findings included: - On 10/16/23 at 12:00PM, observation of the main dining room revealed the following: The sink countertop edge lacked a piece of laminate trim approximately two feet wide by 4 inches wide, showing the rough wood. The countertop had another piece of laminated trim missing in the right corner approximately four inches long by two inches wide. On 10/016/23 at 12:00 PM six fluorescent ceiling light fixtures throughout the dining room had numerous dead bugs in them. On 10/16/23 at 12:24 PM, observation revealed five of the six dining chairs in the rehab dining room had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to notify the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (resident advocate) of Resident (R)26's discharges to a hospital in July 2023 and in September 2023. This deficient practice placed R26 at risk for decreased oversight of transfers. Findings included: - R26's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), end stage renal disease requiring dialysis (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys), and heart disease. R26's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R26 required supervision for hygiene, limited staff assistance for eating, and extensive staff assistance for bed mobility, toileting,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a Bed Hold Notice to Resident (R) 26 upon discharge to a hospital in July 2023 and in September 2023. This deficient practice placed R26 at risk of making uninformed decisions regarding her care. Findings included: - R26's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), end stage renal disease requiring dialysis (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys), and heart disease. R26's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R26 required supervision for hygiene, limited staff assistance for eating, and extensive staff assistance for bed mobility, toileting, mobility. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for smoking safety. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan to include Resident (R) 127's smoking. This deficient practice placed R127 at risk for impaired safety due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R127's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of a fracture of left lower leg, schizophrenia (mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought), and orthostatic hypotension (blood pressure dropping with change of position). The Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], was in progress. R127's baseline Care Plan dated 10/06/23 lacked information regarding R127's smoking. R127's EMR lacked evidence the facility assessed the resident's ability to safely smoke and lacked determination if the resident required supervision while smoking. On 10/17/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for smoking safety. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess Resident (R) 127 for safety while smoking. This deficient practice placed R127 at risk for accidents while smoking. Findings included: - R127's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of a fracture of left lower leg, schizophrenia (mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought), and orthostatic hypotension (blood pressure dropping with change of position). The Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], was in progress. R127's baseline Care Plan dated 10/06/23 lacked information regarding R127 smoking. R127's EMR lacked evidence the facility assessed the resident's ability to safely smoke and lacked determination if the resident required supervision while smoking. On 10/17/23 at 10:30 AM, observation revealed R127 outside on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for hydration. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor fluid intake for Resident (R) 41, as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice placed R41 at risk for fluid overload. Findings included: - R41's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of chronic congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), fluid overload, heart transplant status, end stage renal disease (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys) with dependence on renal dialysis (procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) and cognitive communication deficit. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R41 required supervision for eating, hygiene, limited staff assistance for bed mobility, and extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary drugs. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the consultant pharmacist's recommendation and obtain a specific approved indication for the use of Seroquel (antipsychotic medication used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions). This deficient practice placed Resident (R)60 at risk for inappropriate use of antipsychotic medication. Findings included: - R60's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of encephalopathy (disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected by some agent or condition), pervasive developmental disorder (condition resulting from delayed mental or physical development), cerebral palsy (progressive disorder of movement, muscle tone or posture caused by injury or abnormal development in the immature brain, most often before birth), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for psychotropic drug use. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication, or a documented physician rationale which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for the continued use of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) for Resident (R)60, who had a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). This placed the resident at risk for unnecessary psychotropic (alters perception, mood, consciousness, cognition, or behavior) medications and related complications. Findings included: - R60's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of encephalopathy (disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected by some agent or condition), pervasive developmental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY DEFICIENCY TEMPLATE F 600 The facility identified a census of seventy-six residents. The sample included six residents. Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)1 was free from avoidable accidents when a staff member performed an unsafe transfer of R1. This resulted in a skin tear which placed R1 at increased risk for pain, infection or other complications. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the Diagnoses tab recorded diagnoses of rheumatoid arthritis, (a long-term autoimmune disorder resulting in warm, swollen, and painful joints; Pain and stiffness often worse following rest); chronic pain syndrome, (persistent or intermittent pain that last for more than three months); chronic kidney disease, (damaged kidneys resulting in an inability to filter blood the way they should); and cardiomegaly (an enlarged heart, caused by damage to the heart muscle, a condition that makes the heart pump harder than usual). The Medicare 5- day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R18's Physician's Order Sheet, dated 11/23/21, recorded the diagnoses of bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods) and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). R18's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R18 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS recorded she required extensive staff assistance with personal hygiene and bathing. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Plan, dated 11/04/21, directed R18 required one staff to provide the resident assistance with bathing two times a week. R18's Bathing Report and bath sheets documented the resident received a shower/bath on Wednesday evening shift and Saturday day shift. The November Bathing Report documented the resident received a shower/bath on the following days: 11/06/21 11/09/21 11/10/21 11/13/21 11/27/21 (no shower/bath for 13 days) The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 71 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label Resident (R) 20, R14, R66, R44, R25, R27, and R56s insulin (hormone which allows cells throughout the body to uptake glucose) pens and vial with the date opened and expiration date, and discard expired stock medications on two of four medication carts. This placed these residents at risk for ineffective medications. Findings included: - On 01/24/22 at 07:30 AM, observation of the [NAME] medication cart, revealed one bottle of senna plus (laxative), 100 count tablets, expired 11/21, and acetaminophen (pain reliever), 16 fluid ounces, expired 11/21. On 01/24/22 at 08:00 AM, observation of the East medication cart, revealed the following: R20's Levemir (a long acting insulin that can work for around 24 hours or longer) flex pen lacked a date opened, and date of expiration. R14's Lantus (long acting insulin) flex pen lacked a date opened, and date of expiration. R66's Glargine (long acting insulin) flex pen lacked a date opened,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 71 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with three reviewed for Beneficiary Notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide two sampled residents, Resident (R) 9, and R44 (or their representative) the completed Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) Form 10055. This placed the residents at risk to make uninformed decisions about their skilled services. Findings included: - The Medicare Form 10055 informed the beneficiary that Medicare may not pay for skilled therapy services and provided a cost estimate for continued services. It explained: (1) if Medicare does not pay, the resident would be responsible for payment, but can make an appeal to Medicare, (2) receive therapy listed, but do not bill Medicare, would be responsible for payment for services, or (3) does not want the listed services. A provider must issue advance written notice to enrollees before termination of services in a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF), Home Health Agency (HHA), or Comprehensive Outpatient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 71 residents. The sample included 18 residents with three reviewed for pressure ulcers. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a low air loss (LAL) mattress (designed to distribute the patient's body weight over a broad surface area and help prevent skin breakdown) as ordered by the physician for one of three sampled residents, Resident (R) 61. This placed R61 at risk to worsen her current pressure ulcer or develop more skin issues. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet, dated 01/02/22, recorded R61 had diagnoses of chronic pain, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain), and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R61 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 (moderately impaired cognition). The MDS recorded R61 required extensive staff assistance with transfers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 71 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain respiratory assessments prior to and after the development of COVID-19 (a highly contagious respiratory condition) for Resident (R)37, placing the resident at risk for delayed identification and treatment for a decline in condition. Findings Included: - R37's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 10/05/21, documented diagnoses of rhabdomyolysis (a breakdown of muscle tissue breakdown resulting in the release of a protein into the blood that can damage the kidneys), chronic pancreatitis (inflammation of organ that helps digestion and regulates blood sugar), heart failure, atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat ), cardiomyopathy (disease of heart muscle), dehydration, and disorder of the kidney. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded the resident had moderately impaired cognition, required supervision and limited assistance of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 71 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain and administer blood pressure medication for one of five residents reviewed for medication use, Resident (R) 55, placing the resident at risk for elevated blood pressure and/or chest pain. Findings included: - R55's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 12/23/21, documented diagnoses of malignant (the tendency of a medical condition, especially tumors, to become progressively worse, most familiar as a characteristic of cancer) neoplasm ([tumor] of lung, bladder and right ureter (the duct by which urine is passed from the kidney to the bladder), chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (COPD) (progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), gastroenteritis (inflammation of the stomach lining), dehydration and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 71 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, failed to complete a pharmacist recommended GDR (gradual dose reduction) for psychotropic medications (medications that affect a person's mental state) for Resident (R) 2, and ensure a stop date or rationale for extended use for PRN (as needed) psychotropic (medications that affect a person's mental state) medication for R18. This placed R2 and R18 at risk to receive unnecessary psychotropic medications and adverse medication side effects. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet, dated 01/05/22, recorded R2 had diagnoses of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) (unreasonable thoughts and fears that lead to irrational repetitive behaviors), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (condition triggered by intense emotional and physical events/memories), depression (emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 71 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for hospice (a type of health care that focused on the terminally ill patient's pain and symptoms and attending to their emotional and spiritual needs at the end of life) services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a coordinated plan of care, which coordinated care and services provided by the facility with the care and services provided by hospice, was developed and available for Resident (R) 6. This placed R6 at risk for inappropriate end of life cares. Findings included : - R6's Physician Order Sheet, dated 11/03/21, documented diagnoses of hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, kidney disease stage 3 (longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to kidney failure), arteriosclerotic heart disease (a thickening and hardening of the walls of the coronary arteries) and pancytopenia (a combination of three different blood disorders). R6's Significant Change Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 71 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter tubing did not touch the floor for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 2. This placed R2 at risk for urinary tract infections (UTI). Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet, dated 01/05/22, recorded R2 had diagnoses of neurogenic bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system), history of UTI, chronic pain, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty breathing). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 (cognitively intact) with verbal behaviors and rejection of cares. The MDS recorded R2 required limited staff assistance with transfers, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene, and had a urinary catheter. The Urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-10-19 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the daily staff nursing hours were posted for three of four of the survey onsite days. Findings included: - On 10/16-18/23 observation revealed the daily nurse staffing hours were not posted in the facility. 10/18/23 at 09:34 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the daily nurse staffing hours were not posted. Administrative Nurse D stated it should be posted in a highly visible area. The facility's Nurse Staffing Information Policy, revised 04/01/23, documented the facility must post the following information daily: facility name, the current date, the total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift, which included registered nurses, licensed practical nurses or licensed vocational nurses (as defined under State law), number of certified nurse aides, and the resident census. The policy documented the facility must post…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$92,612 in federal fines across 15 penalties.

  • $17,940 — penalty dated 2025-01-13
  • $15,041 — penalty dated 2024-07-03
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.2-2.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA 1 of 5St. Joseph's Rehabilitation and Care CenterNorfolk, NE

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
JORGENSEN, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/22/2024
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/22/2024
FITCH, CRAIGIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/22/2024
LEWIS, CORWINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/22/2024
SATO, AMIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/09/2024
HOLLIS, JACQUELINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/06/2025
GEHA, CHRISTOPHERIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/22/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$369K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 7%Other / private 31%

This home reported $369K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$367per resident / day
operating cost
$11,158per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$352per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175187. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next