No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Fort Dodge Health and Rehabilitation

728 14th Avenue North, Fort Dodge, IA 50501 · For profit - Corporation · 65 certified beds · (515) 576-7226 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Jul 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation$166,043 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $166,043 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-26)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
126 N 10th St · (515) 576-6500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
126 N 10th St · (515) 576-6500 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Duhdndnsn0.8 mi
541 3rd Ave N
Park
N 7th St & Loomis Park Dr · (515) 576-7237 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.4%17.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%4.6%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.7%1.5%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms49.8%4.2%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.9%3.8%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.8%16.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.8%20.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.1%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.3%4.2%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.4%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.8%19.5%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.0%2.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.7%73.3%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.7%20.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.4%13.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.601.491.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.222.081.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.45U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.8%CMS range 38.5–61.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.4–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge41.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 4.2–14.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.711.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
0.53
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.18
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
48.8%
Total nursing turnover
87.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 59.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-26)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-15)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview, Physician interview, Nurse Practitioner (NP) interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete thorough assessments and interventions when 3 of 3 residents (Residents #1, #4 and #5) sustained skin breakdown. In addition, the facility failed to properly assess one (1) resident following a fall (Resident #2). Resident #1 had a previous history of an amputation on his left foot. Following his surgery, the facility failed to follow physician orders, complete thorough skin assessments, and failed to follow treatments. Per the Podiatrist, Resident #1 had an additional amputation due to the lack of care and treatment he received. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation.On 8/14/25 at 5:20 p.m. the Iowa Department of Inspections and Appeals staff contacted the facility staff to notify them the Department staff determined an Immediate Jeopardy situation existed at the facility. The facility staff removed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess, document, and provide interventions for pressure ulcers for 2 out of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #23 and #26). The failure to manage Resident #26's pressure wounds resulted in Stage 3 pressure ulcers to her right and left heels. The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include:The MDS assessment identifies the definition of pressure ulcers: Stage I is an intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. Darkly pigmented skin may not have a visible blanching; in dark skin tones only, it may appear with persistent blue or purple hues. Stage II is partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough (dead tissue, usually cream or yellow in color). May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister. Stage III Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle is not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received safe and appropriate assistance during transfers for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #4 and #2). The facility's failure to follow established transfer procedures and provide the necessary assistance placed residents at risk for injury and failed to ensure a safe environment. Resident #4 slid from a mechanical lift sling during a transfer and fell to the floor, sustaining a rib fracture. Resident #2 experienced a fall during a transfer when the staff failed to provide the required level of assistance resulting in complaints of shoulder pain. The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include:1. Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS listed Resident #4 as dependent on staff for all cares and used a wheelchair for mobility. The MDS included diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, facility policy review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident needing a mechanical lift were provided safe and appropriate transfers to prevent injuries for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings Include: Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was a 4, indicating severe cognition. The MDS listed Resident #2 as dependent on the facility staff for all activities of daily living (ADL's). The MDS included diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, aphasia (difficulty speaking), diabetes mellitus, and arthritis. The MDS listed Resident #2's weight as 318 pounds. The Nursing Note dated 9/24/25 at 11:52 AM, reflected Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), called Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), to Resident #2's room because Resident #2 fell out of the mechanical lift. Upon entering the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, staff, family, and Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP) interviews, the facility failed to assess a resident's lung sounds, before and after administering a nebulizer treatment (a medication that turns liquid medication into a mist, which is inhaled to treat respiratory conditions. It helps relax breathing muscles and makes it easier to breathe). In addition, the facility failed to intervene when the resident had shortness of breath (SOB) on exertion (walking, bathing, and transferring), sitting, at rest, and when lying flat in bed on 4/16/25, 4/17/25, 4/18/25, 4/19/25, and 4/21/25 for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Without the assessment, the staff failed to notice the change in Resident #1's lungs, delaying the transfer to the hospital. On 4/22/25, the hospital admitted Resident #1 and tested positive for parainfluenza (lung infection) and passed away on 5/5/25. The facility identified a census of 63 residents. Findings include:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, resident interviews, facility records, and policy review the facility failed to provide assessment and interventions necessary for the care and services, to maintain the residents' highest practical physical well-being for 2 of 2 resident reviewed (Resident #268 and #24). The facility failed to complete assessments and interventions for a resident who had bed bugs and a resident diagnosed with a urinary tract infection. Findings include: 1. Resident #268's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS described Resident #268 as dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet transfers. Resident #268 did not walk during the assessment period. Resident #268's MDS included diagnoses of coronary artery disease, hypertension (high blood pressure), seizure disorder, non-st elevation myocardial infarction (heart attack) and hemiplegia and hemiparesis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility staff failed to provide respect and dignity for 2 out of 19 residents reviewed (Resident #11 and Resident #22). The facility failed to cover Resident #11's catheter bag with a dignity bag. During a wound treatment, the staff spoke disrespectfully to Resident #22. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include:1. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented diagnoses for Resident #11 included non-Alzheimer's dementia, reduced mobility and depression. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) documented a score of 6 out of 15, which indicated severely impaired cognitive functioning. This resident had an indwelling catheter. On 2/9/26 at 10:30 a.m., observed Resident #11 from the hallway as he laid in bed, his catheter bag hanged off of his bed without a covering. At 3:00 p.m., he continued to have no covering on his catheter bag. At 4:00 p.m., he still didn't have a covering over the catheter bag. On 2/10/26 at 10:00 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure personal privacy during care for 1 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #7). The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #7 scored 11 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident depended on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL's). Diagnoses included traumatic spinal cord injury, aphasia (neurological language disorder affecting a person's ability to speak), and quadriplegia (paralysis of all 4 extremities). Resident #7 had a feeding tube.The Care Plan dated 8/29/22 included Resident #7 required a tube feeding related to a swallowing problem. The interventions included the resident would remain free of side effects or complications related to tube feeding.On 2/11/2026 9:46 a.m. Staff B Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) went to discontinue Resident #7's feeding and treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #3 and #35). The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: 1) A Discharge Summary Note dated 1/22/26 at 3:09 p.m., documented Resident #35 admitted to the facility for Post-Acute Care/Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Services. Resident #35 improved and no longer required facility services. Planned discharge date [DATE]. A Census Page documented the facility stopped billing Resident #35 on 1/23/26. On 2/10/26 at 4:45 p.m., an email sent to the Administrator asked for the Ombudsman Notifications for the months of July, August, October, and November 2025 and January 2026. Another email sent on 2/11/26 at 1:19 p.m., asked again for the notices. On 2/11/26 at 1:35 p.m., the Administrator stated that the facility failed to do the Ombudsman Notifications. On 2/12/26 at 1;30 p.m., the DON stated the facility didn't have an Ombudsman policy, as they just follow the guidelines.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of CMS's Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) conditions, the facility failed to complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately for 1 of 20 residents reviewed (Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #8 was not considered by the state level II PASRR process to have a serious mental illness. The resident scored 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident's diagnoses included bipolar disorder and anxiety disorder.The most recent PASRR dated 12/5/23 documented a PASRR Level1 identification Screen reviewed for potential PASRR status showed Resident #8 had evidence of a serious mental illness. However, his condition did not require further PASRR evaluation because his serious mental illness needs had not significantly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a baseline Care Plan for 1 of 22 (Resident #55). The facility reported a census of 59.Findings include:Resident #55's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] listed an admission date of 1/2/26. Resident #55's Census reviewed on 2/16/26 listed an admission date of 1/2/26.Resident #55's clinical record lacked a Baseline Care Plan.On 2/11/26 at 5:02 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) said she couldn't locate a Baseline Care Plan at all in the documents.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan to reflect a resident's current status for 2 of 20 residents reviewed (Resident #8 and #23). The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include:1) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #8 scored 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder and anxiety disorder. The Care Plan dated 12/4/23 identified Resident #8 had Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) related to smoking. The Care Plan initiated 11/4/24 identified Resident #8 had the potential for injury related to smoking. The goal read Resident #8 would be compliant with the individual smoking plan until next review. Interventions included completion of a smoking assessment as needed, educating Resident #8 on safe smoking practices, maintaining smoking materials at the nurses' station or other designated area, requiring a smoking apron,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide bowel interventions for a resident that went without a bowel movement from 2/6/26 at 11:57 a.m. until 2/16/26 at 1:59 p.m. for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #11). The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: Resident #11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, reduced mobility and depression. The MDS identified Resident #11 had an indwelling catheter and listed him as always incontinent for bowel movements. Resident #11's Census printed 2/12/26 documented his primary payor as Hospice Medicaid effective 12/12/25. The Bowel Movement/Bowel Continence Response history for the previous 14 days printed 2/12/26 at 3:00 p.m., documented Resident #11 had a medium sized bowel movement on 2/6/26 at 11:57 a.m. The documentation reflected he did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to perform a feeding tube procedure per the physician's order for 1 resident with a feeding tube (Resident #7). The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #7 scored 11 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident depended on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL's). Diagnoses included traumatic spinal cord injury, aphasia (neurological language disorder affecting a person's ability to speak), and quadriplegia (paralysis of all 4 extremities). Resident #7 had a feeding tube.The Care Plan dated 8/29/22 included Resident #7 required a tube feeding related to a swallowing problem. The interventions included the resident would remain free of side effects or complications related to tube feeding.The Physician's Orders in the facility Electronic Health Record (EHR) included every day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete post dialysis assessments for 1 resident reviewed on dialysis (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #2 scored 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident's diagnoses included chronic kidney disease and she received dialysis.The Care Plan identified Resident #2 needed dialysis related to renal failure Initiated 4/19/25. Interventions included the resident had dialysis Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, and obtaining vital signs and reporting significant changes in pulse, respirations and blood pressure immediately.The Nursing Dialysis Communication Records for 12/1, 12/5, 12/8, 12/10, 12/12, 12/17, 12/19, 12/22, 12/23, 12/26, and 12/29/25, lacked vital signs on return from dialysis.The Nursing Dialysis Communication Records for 1/5, 1/9, 1/14, 1/16,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, staff and provider interview, the facility failed to ensure medication administrations met the accepted professional standards for 2 of 12 residents reviewed (Residents #1 and #32). The Nursing staff failed to administer a prescribed cancer medication to Resident #1 and failed to notify the physician they didn't give the medication. In addition, the nursing staff administered Resident #32 insulin doses higher than ordered by the physician, placing the residents at risk for adverse health outcomes related to omitted and/or incorrectly dosed medications. The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include:1. Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of multiple myeloma (blood cancer), prostate cancer, anemia (low blood iron), heart failure, kidney failure, type 2 diabetes, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0774 — isolated
    Help the resident with transportation to and from laboratory services outside of the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to transport 1 of 2 residents reviewed for wound care (Resident #23) to their Wound Center appointment. The facility failed to ensure transportation for Resident #23 to attended their scheduled wound treatment appointment, resulting in a delay in wound care. The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include:Resident #23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), acute respiratory failure (new short-term lung failure), and weakness. The Nursing Progress Note dated 11/21/25 at 11:51 PM documented a full assessment for Resident #23 prior to an emergency room transfer for altered mental status. The note included findings of skin alteration to Resident #23's lower left buttock with red areas to his right buttock. Resident #23's Hospital Records dated 11/28/25 at 10:45…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interviews, facility policy review, and review of prior survey history, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to address and prevent the recurrence of previously cited deficiencies. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include:Review of the facility's Provider History Report revealed the facility received the same deficiency during the current survey and a complaint survey in November 2025 of the deficiency category free of accident hazards and provision of adequate supervision/assistive devices to prevent accidents (F689).In an interview on 2/9/26 at 3:20 PM, the Administrator stated, QAPI meetings are done monthly with the facility's Medical Director attending at least quarterly. They identified resident falls and the QAPI committee looked at the mechanical lift transfers with the previous incidents with the lift happening a few months before. In an interview on 2/9/26 at 3:20 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 of 3 resident's reviewed (Resident #7), failed to adhere to appropriate Hand Hygiene (HH) practices for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #7, #11, and #26), and failed to employ infection control practices with catheter care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #26). The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include: 1. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #7 scored 11 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident depended on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL's). Diagnoses included traumatic spinal cord injury, aphasia (neurological language disorder affecting a person's ability to speak), and quadriplegia (paralysis of all 4 extremities). Resident #7 had a feeding tube. The Care Plan dated 8/29/22 included Resident #7 required a tube feeding related to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered/administered influenza and or pneumonia vaccines for 4 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #2, #5, #6, and #7). The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include: 1) Based on review of a record printed off by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 2/12/26 at 10:12 a.m. Resident #2 was due for an influenza vaccine on 9/1/26. The resident's clinical record lacked documentation she had been offered the flu vaccine. In an email dated 2/16/26 at 11:18 a.m. the DON It appeared Resident #2 was due for the flu vaccine on 9/1/25. The DON had not found that she received them. Unfortunately, the vaccine provider had not sent a list of vaccines he provided. 2) In an email on 2/16/26 at 11:18 a.m. the DON documented Resident #5 was not up to date with the influenza vaccine. The resident's clinical record lacked documentation he had been offered the flu vaccine. 3) In an email on 2/16/26 at 11:18 a.m. the DON documented Resident #6 had the flu vaccine 11/8/25, but not up to date on other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered/administered COVID vaccines for 5 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #2, #5, #6, #7 and #10). The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include:1) Review of an immunization record printed off by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 2/12/26 at 10:12 a.m. indicated Resident #2 was due for a COVID-19 vaccine on 9/1/25. The resident's clinical record lacked documentation she had been offered the COVID-19 vaccine. In an email dated 2/16/26 at 11:18 a.m. the DON It appeared Resident #2 was due for the COVID vaccine on 9/1/25. The DON had not found that she received them. Unfortunately, the vaccine provider had not sent a list of vaccines he provided. 2) In an email on 2/16/26 at 11:18 a.m. the DON documented Resident #5 was not up to date with the COVID-19 vaccine. The resident's clinical record lacked documentation he had been offered the COVID vaccine. 3) In an email on 2/16/26 at 11:18 a.m. the DON documented Resident #6 was not up to date with vaccines. The resident's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, photos, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain resident rooms and care equipment in a clean, sanitary and homelike environment. The reported a census of 64 residents.Findings include:1. On 8/14/25 at 1:38 PM observed dried, brown, long, running stains that ran down the wall beside Resident #4's bed.On 8/15/25 at 1:30 PM witnessed Resident #4's wall continued to have the stains.On 8/27/25 at 11:00 AM witnessed the stains remained on Resident #4's wall. Photos taken during an observation on 8/15/25 at 11:10 AM revealed the following: a. Buildup of dust, dirt, and debris on a stand-up lift device positioned along the wall on the 100 hallway. b. Buildup of a brown/rust substance along a scale device attached to the anterior portion of a total lift device also positioned along the wall on the 100 hallway. Photos taken during an observation on 8/15/25 at 11:30 PM revealed the following: a. A bedside fall mat positioned beside Resident #4's bed contained a torn…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interview, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) interview, and review of the facilities Resident Rights, the facility staff failed to treat 1 of 3 residents with dignity and respect during a medical crisis (Resident #2). The facility identified a census of 64 resident. Findings include: Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, indicating severely impaired cognitive skills. Resident #2 required substantial to maximum assistance with toileting and hygiene. The MDS listed Resident #2 as non-ambulatory. The MDS listed Resident #2 as always incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowels. The MDS included diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, other signs and symptoms with cognitive functions and awareness, age-related physical debility, sciatica (pain from pressure on a nerve in the back that goes down a leg), weakness, type ii diabetes mellitus (dm), and end stage renal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and facility policy review the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) for 1 of 3 residents with multiple skin issues (Resident #4). The facility identified a census of 64 residents. Findings include: Resident #4's MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated he had a short- and long-term memory deficit and severely impaired cognition. The MDS listed Resident #4 as dependent on staff with activities of daily living (ADL's). The MDS reflected Resident #4 didn't walk. The MDS included diagnoses of type II diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease, non-Alzheimer's dementia and malnutrition. The MDS indicated Resident #4 didn't have a pressure ulcer/injury, a scar over bony prominence, or a non-removable dressing/device. The MDS identified he had a risk for pressure ulcers/injuries. The MDS reflected he had diabetic foot ulcer(s). He had pressure reducing devices in the bed and chair, but didn't have a turning/repositioning program.Resident #4's MDS assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview, family interview and facility policy review the facility failed to follow Physician orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility identified a census of 64 residents. Findings include:A Progress Record form dated 7/10/25 indicated Resident #1 received a physician's order for a wound vacuum (vac) at 125 mmHg (millimeters of mercury which measured the pressure of the device), to start when available. The order directed to run continuously and changed every Monday, Wednesday and Friday.The Order Details form dated 7/15/25 at 5:52 PM directed to change the wound vac every 30 minutes on Monday, Wednesday and Friday starting 7/16/25.According to a Medication Admin Audit Report form printed 8/26/25 at 1:58 PM identified Resident #1's schedule to change wound vac on 7/16/25 as 6:00 AM, 6:30 AM, and 7:00 AM. The record indicated the nurse did the wound dressing at 5:09 AM, 10:59 AM, and 11:00 AM.The eMAR - Medication Administration Note dated 7/16/25 at 4:52 AM indicated Resident #1 got his wound vac changed twice the day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, resident, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure they had medications available at the facility to administer as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 63 residents. Findings include Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Resident #2 required partial/moderate assistance with their activities of daily living (ADLs). The included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus, depression, and oral cavity (mouth) with obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. The Care Plan Focus initiated 4/3/25 and resolved on 4/30/25 indicated Resident #2 received an antifungal medication due to thrush (a fungus infection of the mouth and throat). The Interventions instructed: a. 4/9/25: Administer antipyretic (medication used to decrease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, hospital staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide timely intervention to a resident with a change in condition for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1) for assessment and intervention. After the return of Resident #1's return to the facility from the hospital, he continued to have elevated blood sugars. The facility staff failed to provide timely intervention for Resident #1's elevated blood sugars that had a poor oral intake, only drinking chocolate milk. On 3/21/25, Resident #1 admitted to the hospital with diabetic ketoacidosis (an imbalance of the body's electrolytes due to an inadequate insulin intake that is a medical emergency). The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #1 required staff supervision with eating. The MDS included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility staff failed to notify the physician in a timely manner of changes in a resident's status, failed to ensure the physician collaborated with the facility staff on the care and treatment of a diabetic resident, and failed to ensure the provider / specialist followed up in a timely manner for a resident's care and needs for 1 of 4 residents reviewed diabetes care and treatment and/or had a change in condition (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings: Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #1 required staff supervision with eating. The MDS included diagnoses of diabetes, heart failure, renal insufficiency (impaired kidney function), Alzheimer's disease, and malnutrition (inadequate intake of nutrients). Resident #1 received insulin within the lookback period. Resident #1's MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards regarding medication administration and following physician orders for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #213). The facility administered medications outside of the scheduled time frame per facility policy. The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: Resident #213's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #213 required moderate assistance with toileting and extensive assistance with transfers. The MDS listed Resident #213 as occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. The MDS included diagnoses of a hip replacement, diabetes, and depression. Resident #213's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the time frame of 11/27/24 through 12/1/24 reflected the following medications given out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered within 15 minutes for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #43 and #213). The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #213's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #213 required moderate assistance with toileting and extensive assistance with transfers. The MDS listed Resident #213 as occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. The MDS included diagnoses of a hip replacement, diabetes, and depression. The Care Plan initiated 11/21/24 indicated Resident #213 had an actual impairment to their skin integrity due to their right hip surgical wound. The Interventions included to use caution during transfers and bed mobility. The Device Activity Report (Call light log) for the time period of 11/20/24 through 11/27/24 related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to assure a resident received a physical and occupational therapy evaluation timely upon admission for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #213). The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: Resident #213's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #213 required moderate assistance with toileting and extensive assistance with transfers. The MDS listed Resident #213 as occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. The MDS included diagnoses of a hip replacement, diabetes, and depression. The Discharge summary dated [DATE], indicated Resident #213 admitted to the hospital on [DATE] for a right total hip arthroplasty due to a diagnosis of osteoarthritis (a condition that causes the breakdown of cartilage in the joints, leading to pain and stiffness) of the right hip. The Summary indicated Resident #213…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, policy and procedure review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed, (Resident #1). The facility identified a census of 55 residents. Findings include: 1. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1, with an assessment reference dated 4/4/24, documented diagnoses for which included hypertension, diabetes mellitus, anxiety, depression, muscle weakness and cognitive communication deficit. The MDS revealed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 for which indicated no cognitive impairment, and able to be understood and has the ability to understand others, and dependent with toileting hygiene and lower body dressing. The Plan of Care with a initiated date 5/4/24, stated the resident was at risk for re-traumatization related to history of trauma due to previous verbal abuse occurring in the past. Interventions include: *Approach in a calm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility self report, staff interview and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or abuse of a resident and/or residents are reported per facility policy to the Iowa Department of Inspection and Appeals within 2 hours, (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: 1. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1, with an assessment reference dated 4/4/24, documented diagnoses for which included hypertension, diabetes mellitus, anxiety, depression, muscle weakness and cognitive communication deficit. The MDS revealed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 for which indicated no cognitive impairment, and able to be understood and has the ability to understand others, and dependent with toileting hygiene and lower body dressing. The Plan of Care with a initiated date 4/9/24, stated the resident has performance deficit related to limited mobility, Musculoskeletal impairment, pain, trauma, and limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement and have an effective pest control program policy. The facility halted routine and as needed visits from their Pest Control provider from 9/1/23 to 1/2/2024. During that time, the facility attempted to treat the facility's bed bug problem with sprays and a heat machine. Findings include: Resident #268's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 2/29/24 at 1:45 PM, Resident #268 reported a nurse told her she had bed bugs. She stated the nurses looked at the bites/rash areas and could tell they were from bed bugs. She stated she didn't know if the facility had the bugs before. She thinks it might have spread but was not positive. She stated she knew the facility treated other resident rooms and bed bugs travel. She reported the facility sprayed her room a couple of times and ran a heater. When they did the heat treatment, they moved her to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    F 812 Food Procurement, Store/Prepare/Serve-Sanitary Based on record review and policy review the facility failed to maintain a cleaning schedule for the convection oven. An observation found a dark brown and black substance throughout the convection oven. The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings include: During an observation on 2/25/24 at 10:25 AM of the kitchen revealed the convection oven with black substance and crumbs throughout the inside. During an observation on 2/27/24 at 12:34 PM revealed the convection oven continued to have a black substance and debris throughout the inside. The undated and untitled kitchen cleaning schedule provided by the facility lacked instruction on when to clean the convection oven. The Kitchen Sanitation and Cleaning policy revised August 2021 instructed the following: a. Please follow these steps to clean kitchen equipment such as blenders and food processors. i. Turn off and unplug equipment before cleaning ii. Remove food and soil from under and around the equipment iii. Remove any detachable parts iv. Manually wash, rinse, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to document bed bug assessments, treatments and eradication (removal) for 4 out of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #268, #44, #267, #11). In addition, the facility failed to accurately document bed bug treatments in resident's rooms and provided conflicting information regarding the fire alarm response and temperatures of a room during heat treatment. Findings include: 1. Resident #268's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 2/29/24 at 1:45 PM, Resident #268 reported a nurse told her she had bed bugs. She stated the nurses looked at the bites/rash areas and could tell they were from bed bugs. She stated she didn't know if the facility had the bugs before. She thinks it might have spread but was not positive. She stated she knew the facility treated other resident rooms and bed bugs travel. She reported the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file reviews, facility policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the required 2-hour dependent adult abuse training within 6 months of hire for 1 of 5 employees reviewed (Staff F). The facility identified a census of 60 residents. Findings include: Staff F, Dietary Aide's, personnel file listed a hired date of 4/28/23. The personnel file lacked a completed dependent adult abuse (DAA) training. On 2/27/24 at 4:20 PM, Staff G, Business Office Manager, reported Staff F completed his DAA training on 2/27/24. Staff G acknowledged Staff F took the Dependent Adult Abuse training. On 2/27/24 at 5:00 PM, the Administrator reported she expected the staff to complete the Dependent Adult Abuse Training within 6 months of hire. The Abuse Prevention and Reporting policy revised May 2007 directed employees receive instruction on what constitutes abuse and reporting requirements during orientation and periodically during ongoing in-service education. The policy failed to address completing a dependent adult abuse training within 6 months of hire and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a resident had advanced directives (do not resuscitate (DNR) or full code (CPR)) in place for 1 of 16 residents reviewed (Resident #28). The advanced directives provide direction for the staff if the resident is unable to speak for themselves in an emergency, such as their heart stopped beating. Findings include: Resident #28's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] listed an admission date of [DATE]. Resident #28's Clinical Physician Orders reviewed on [DATE] listed her code status as a DNR (do not provide chest compressions in case their heart stopped). Resident #28's Medical Record reviewed on [DATE] lacked a signed Advanced Directive by herself and medical provider regarding her wishes, since admission to the facility. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:24 AM the facility's Nurse Consultant reported the facility didn't have an Advance Directive for Resident #28. The Advance Directives policy, revised [DATE], instructed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to notify the Physician when a resident had a change of condition for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #24) for urinary tract infections (UTIs). Findings include: Resident #24's MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS listed Resident #24 as independent with bed mobility, transfers, toilet transfers, and walking 150 feet. The MDS documented reflected Resident #24 had occasional incontinence of urine and didn't have a toileting program. Resident #24's MDS included diagnoses of anemia (low blood iron), hypertension (high blood pressure), renal disease (kidney), diabetes mellitus, asthma, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood (short-term disorder that results due to significant changes in the person's life). Resident #24's Laboratory report dated 2/14/24 reflected the staff collected a urinalysis microscopic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the bed hold notice policy for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #267). Findings include: A Progress Note dated 10/26/23 at 12:53 PM, identified while at the facility, the Nurse Practitioner directed to send Resident #267 to the ER (emergency room) for a workup. A Progress Note dated 10/26/23 at 1:30 PM, documented Resident #267 left the facility via ambulance. Resident #267's clinical record lacked a bed hold. On 2/29/24 at 1:23 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON), said she talked with the nurse who sent Resident #267 to the hospital and determined they didn't have a completed bed hold. The DON acknowledged the nurse should have completed a bed hold. An Admission/Discharge/Transfer policy with the subject of Bed Hold dated November 2016, directed staff that the resident, or the resident's representative, shall be informed, in writing, of their right to exercise the bed hold provision in the event of a transfer from the facility to a general acute care hospital or for a therapeutic leave.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family and staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to implement 1 of 6 residents (resident #57) activity preferences on her Baseline Care Plan. Findings include: Resident #57's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] listed an admission date of 11/3/23. The MDS identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of stroke and aphasia (difficulty talking). Resident #57's undated Baseline Care Plan, lacked activities she desires. On 2/28/2024 at 10:30 AM the Nurse Consultant reported she couldn't find Resident #57's activity attendance records. The Baseline Care Plan policy dated May 2021 instructed the facility to develop and implement a Baseline Care Plan within 48's hours of the resident's admission that includes instructions needed to provided effective and person-centered care.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review, family, and staff interview the facility failed to include a resident's activities preferences on their Care Plan 1 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #57). Findings include: Resident #57's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] listed an admission date of 11/3/23. The MDS identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of stroke and aphasia (difficulty talking). During an interview on 2/26/24 at 1:17 PM Resident #57's family revealed Resident #57 used to sing in the church choir and wished they would ask her to attend music. Resident #57's family added she told them, they never ask her to come. Resident #57's Care Plan dated 2/27/24 lacked her activities preferences. On 2/28/2024 at 10:30 AM the Nurse Consultant reported she couldn't find Resident #57's activity attendance records. The Care Planning policy revised September 2020 instructed the facility to develop the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to revise a Care Plan for 1 of 20 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Resident #1 received nutrition through a tube feeding (TF). When their primary care provider (PCP) discontinued the order for Pleasure Foods, the facility failed to remove it from Resident #1's plan of care. Findings include: Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The Clinical Physician's Order reviewed on 3/5/24 included the following orders dated: a. 5/3/19: Give Jevity 1 Cal (Nutritional Supplements) Liquid 83 milliliters (ml) per (/) hour (hr.) via gastrostomy (hole into the stomach through the abdomen) tube (G-tube) one time a day. Run from 7 PM to 7 AM. b. 3/23/22: Discontinue the order of pleasure feeding of pureed diet with thin liquid consistency. The Care Plan Focus dated 1/7/18 indicated Resident #1 had an actual nutritional problem…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to discontinue the order provided by the primary care physician for one resident reviewed (Resident #1). Resident #1 received nutrition through a tube feeding (TF). After the PCP gave an order to discontinue Pleasure Foods, the facility continued to give her food and drink by mouth touch to taste without an order. Findings include: Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of quadriplegia (extreme weakness to paralysis of all four extremities) and traumatic brain injury (TBI). Resident #1 got their nutrition via a feeding tube. The Clinical Physician's Order reviewed on 3/5/24 included the following orders dated: a. 5/3/19: Give Jevity 1 Cal (Nutritional Supplements) Liquid 83 milliliters (ml) per (/) hour (hr.) via gastrostomy (hole into the stomach through the abdomen) tube (G-tube) one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review, family and staff interview the facility failed to provide documentation of the group, individual, and independent activities provided for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #57) for activities. In addition, the facility failed to provide Resident #57 with activities that met her interests and supported her physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Resident #57's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] listed an admission date of 11/3/23. The MDS identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of stroke and aphasia (difficulty talking). On 2/28/2024 at 10:30 AM the Nurse Consultant reported she couldn't find Resident #57's activity attendance records. The Activities Supervisor job description labeled Activities Director (AD) dated 12/27/21, directed the AD to plan, organize, develop, and direct the overall operation of the Activities Department in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview, facility records and facility policy review the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet the needs of residents who resided in the facility for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #48). Findings include: Resident #48's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 2/26/24 at 1:31 PM, Resident #48 reported the facility had low staffing on the weekends. She could tell because she didn't see anyone. The call light times are worse on the weekend when they are short staffed. Her call light can be on for 30 minutes up to an hour. She stated her hip is bone on bone and it is too hard for her to sit that long on the toilet. Her roommate has gone to find someone to get her off the toilet. She stated she times the call light with a clock. She stated she is not bashful and has told staff and management about her concerns with the call light. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, staff, and resident interviews the facility failed to assess and provide interventions necessary for the care and services to maintain the resident's highest practical physical well-being for 3 of 5 residents reviewed with skin impairments, and failed to complete timely resident assessments on admission and re-admission for 3 of 5 residents who required wound care and/or such assessments. (Resident #1, #3 and #7). Findings include: 1. Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS reflected that Resident #1 did not have behaviors and did not resist cares. The assessment indicated that he needed limited assistance from two persons for bed mobility, and extensive assistance from two persons for transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The MDS included diagnoses of coronary artery disease (narrowing of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record, facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice, to provide necessary treatment and services to promote the healing of a pressure ulcer, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #5). Due to the inadequate care Resident #5's pressure ulcer declined and got larger. Findings include: The MDS assessment identifies the definition of pressure ulcers: Stage I is an intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. Darkly pigmented skin may not have a visible blanching; in dark skin tones only, it may appear with persistent blue or purple hues. Stage II is partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough (dead tissue, usually cream or yellow in color). May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister. Stage III Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle is not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$166,043 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $30,745 — penalty dated 2026-02-26
  • $135,298 — penalty dated 2025-08-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.2-2.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 54.4-2.4 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA 1 of 5St. Joseph's Rehabilitation and Care CenterNorfolk, NE

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HAYDEN, ELIZABETHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/26/2016
WALLACE, LINCOLNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/05/2024
JORGENSEN, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
KEETCH, CHADIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2011
KOENIG, DEBRAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/09/2024
SATO, AMIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/09/2024
BURNAM, SOONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/09/2024
PORT, BARRYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/28/2025
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2011
OLESON PARK HEALTH HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/28/2014
THE ENSIGN GROUP INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/18/2011

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$625K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 7%Other / private 17%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $625K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$246per resident / day
operating cost
$7,475per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$285per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165156. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next