Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation Center
710 3rd St, Windsor, CO 80550 · For profit - Corporation · 104 certified beds · (970) 686-7474 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $71,640 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-15)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.2% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.6% | 4.7% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 1.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.8% | 8.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.9% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.4% | 13.3% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 5.9% | 11.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.7% | 94.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.8% | 3.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.4% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 38.9% | 20.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.1% | 1.6% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 65.9% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.30 | 1.38 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.42 | 1.74 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.8%CMS range 26.2–53.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 5.7–15.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.24 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 85.5 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.96 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to create an environment that protected residents from resident-to-resident abuse. This affected six (#2, #3, #5, #6, #8 and #10) of 10 residents out of 12 sample residents residing on three of five units (Mountain View South, Sunrise South, and Mountain View North) in the facility. 1. Resident-to-resident abuse on the Mountain View South UnitResident #4, with severe cognitive loss, exhibited physical aggression toward four residents (#2, #3, #5, and #10), all of whom were cognitively impaired and resided with Resident #4 in the Mountain View South unit. Resident #4 was known to wander aimlessly and in and out of other residents' rooms, and to significantly intrude on the privacy of others. Record review revealed Resident #4 began displaying physically aggressive behavior toward his new roommate, Resident #2, on 5/14/25, which the facility failed to investigate, despite Resident #4 never having shown behaviors of physical aggression before.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards for one (#5) of six residents out of nine sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to respond to Resident #5's failure to void following the removal of the resident's catheter in a timely manner, which delayed the resident's transfer to the hospital.Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #5 was sent to the emergency department on 4/30/26 and returned the same day with an indwelling (tubing placed in the bladder) catheter for urinary retention and an order for an antibiotic. On 5/12/26 at approximately 1:30 p.m. the resident's indwelling catheter was removed per the physician's orders.On 5/12/26 at 7:45 p.m. Resident #5 was sitting in the dining room and told the nurse he was not feeling well. Resident #5 was escorted to his room and his vital signs were checked and within normal limits. The nurse documented the catheter had been removed earlier in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-12-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure effective interventions were in place to address weight loss timely in one (#54) of seven residents out of 40 sample residents. Resident #54, who was identified as being at increased nutritional risk related to decreased oral intake and Alzheimer's disease, experienced a significant weight loss of 10.25% in a one month period of time and 12.42% in a three month period. The facility failed to ensure effective and timely interventions were in place to monitor, identify and prevent Resident #54's significant weight loss. The facility failed to monitor weekly weights, failed to consistently monitor meal intakes and failed to offer snacks when the resident refused or slept through meals. Additionally, the facility failed to implement new nutritional supplement interventions until 11/21/23, after the significant weight loss was identified. Due to the facility failures, the resident sustained a significant weight loss of 10.25% in one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to take effective steps to prevent inappropriate sexual behavior that involved three of five residents (#49, #225, and #35), all cognitively impaired, who resided on the facility's all male secure unit. Specifically, the facility failed to implement measures to prevent inappropriate sexual behavior between Resident #49 and Resident #225, inappropriate sexual behavior between Resident #49 and Resident #35, and the potential for inappropriate sexual behavior among other residents on the unit. Resident #225 was admitted to the facility's all male secure unit from a sister facility where he had exhibited sexually inappropriate behaviors toward female residents. An admission assessment by the medical director documented that the resident was not capable of understanding the nature of his behavior, accepting it, using any kind of internal restraint. The plan, per the medical director's discussion with the nursing home administrator (NHA), was to increase staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for one (#5) of six residents reviewed for medications errors out of nine sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #5 received antibiotics for a diagnosis of a urinary tract infection (UTI) per the physician's orders.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedure The Administration of Medications policy, dated July 2017, was provided by nursing home administrator (NHA) #1 on 5/19/26 at 4:08 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Medication shall be administered as prescribed by the resident's physician, nurse practitioner, or physician's assistant. Medications must be given in accordance with the resident's service plan. Medications must be administered in accordance with the written orders of the attending physician. The nurse or medication technician administering the medication must record such information on the resident's medication administration record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #5's indwelling catheter bag was not touching the floor.Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Proper Techniques For Urinary Catheter Maintenance , (4/25/24), retrieved on 5/26/26, from and https://www.cdc.gov/infection-control/hcp/cauti/summary-of-recommendations.html Keep the collecting bag below the level of the bladder at all times. Do not rest the bag on the floor. II. Facility policy and procedureThe Infection Control Policy/Procedure, dated April 2020, was provided by nursing home administrator (NHA) #1 on 5/19/26 at 4:08 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to prevent the spread of bloodborne pathogens among healthcare workers by the direct or indirect contact with high risk of body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medications out of 37 sample residents were as free from unnecessary medications as possible. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure Resident #1 had behavior monitoring in place for antipsychotic use; and,-Ensure consents were obtained prior to administration of psychotropic medications.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Chemical Restraints and Psychotropic Medication Management policy and procedure, revised April 2025, was provided by the regional consultant on 1/15/26 at 2:42 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents are free from chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience or that are not required to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record. Psychotropic medications shall not be administered for the purpose of discipline or convenience. Residents who use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised timely to include the instructions needed to provide effective and personalized care for one (#9) of three residents out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to revise Resident #9's care plan to address catheter care interventions for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI).Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedureThe Care Planning policy and procedure, revised March 2020, was provided by the regional consultant on 1/15/26 at 2:42 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility that the interdisciplinary team (IDT) shall develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident. Will complete an initial care plan within 48 hours of admission. A comprehensive care plan is developed within seven (7) days of completion of the Resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment.The Catheter Care policy and procedure, revised April 2021, was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#78 and #70) of three residents reviewed for pressure injuries out of 37 sample residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers from developing or worsening.Specifically the facility failed to:-Ensure staff consistently offloaded Resident #78's heels; and, -Ensure staff consistently provided wound care to Resident #78 and Resident #70 in a timely manner, per physician's orders.Findings include:I. Professional reference According to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel, European Pressure Injury Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline, third edition, [NAME] Haesler (Ed.), EPUAP/NPIAP/PPPIA (2019) retrieved on 1/20/26 from https://www.internationalguidelines.com/guideline, Pressure ulcer classification is as follows:Category/Stage 1: Nonblanchable Erythema (discoloration of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who required dialysis services received such services consistent with professional standards of practice for one (#10) of one resident reviewed for dialysis out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to consistently complete the communication form used for dialysis communication for Resident #10Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Dialysis (Renal), Pre and Post-Care policy and procedure, revised April 2025, was received from the regional consultant on 1/15/26 at 9:02 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Assist resident in maintaining homeostasis pre- and post-renal dialysis; assess and maintain patency of renal dialysis access; assess resident daily for function related to renal dialysis; participate in ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services. Assess resident's blood pressure (in non-fistula arm) prior to being transported to the dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control programs (IPCP) were maintained and followed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections on two of four units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff followed appropriate hand hygiene and gown changes while performing wound care for Resident #61; and,-Ensure staff wore the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing incontinence care and transfers for Resident #70, who was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for wounds.Findings include:I. Failed to ensure staff performed appropriate hand hygiene and gown changes while providing wound care for Resident #61A. Facility policy and procedureThe infection Control policy, undated, was received from nursing home administrator (NHA) #1 on 1/12/26 at 10:26 a.m. The policy read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to prevent the spread of bloodborne pathogens among healthcare workers by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop an antibiotic stewardship program that promotes the appropriate use of antibiotics and includes a system of monitoring to improve resident outcomes and reduce antibiotic resistance for one (#8) of five residents out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure clinical signs and symptoms of side effects and adverse reactions were monitored and identified for Resident #8 while the resident was receiving prescribed antibiotics.Findings include:I. Professional referenceThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Antibiotic Prescribing and Usage in Hospitals and Long-term Care, dated 2019, was retrieved on 1/16/26 from https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/hcp/core-elements/hospital.html. It read in pertinent part,Implement policies that apply in all situations to support antibiotic prescribing to include specifying the dose, duration and indication for all courses of antibiotics so that they are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-15 · tag F0839 — widespreadEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure professional staff was licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable State laws.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the acting nursing home administrator's (NHA) license was valid. Findings include:I. Entrance interviewOn [DATE] at 9:00 a.m. the entrance conference was conducted with the director of nursing (DON). The DON said she was acting as the NHA at the time of the survey. The DON said there was a nursing home administrator in training who was preparing to become the permanent licensed NHA.II. Record reviewOn [DATE] at 9:15 a.m. a review was conducted on the State licensing website. The website showed the DON had applied for a temporary NHA license for emergency situations. The original issue and effective date was [DATE] and the expiration date was [DATE]. The NHA temporary permit for emergency situations was listed as expired.On [DATE] at 2:10 p.m. the corporate operations director provided the license invoice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective quality assurance program to identify and address facility compliance concerns was implemented, in order to facilitate improvement in the lives of nursing home residents, through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life and resident safety.Specifically, the quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program committee failed to identify and address concerns related to freedom from abuse that rose to the level of immediate jeopardy and created a situation where a serious adverse outcome was likely to occur. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy and procedure, revised December 2024, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 7/15/25 at 1:00 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing program designed to monitor and evaluate the quality of resident care, and to resolve identified problems. The primary purposes of the Quality Assessment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents and their representatives were provided prompt efforts by the facility to resolve grievances for one (#3) of eight residents reviewed for grievances out of 14 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to document and follow-up on grievances reported by Resident #3 regarding a missing cell phone and eye glasses. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Grievances policy, dated December 2024, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/4/25 at 2:07 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to establish a grievance process that allows residents a way to execute their right to voice concerns or grievances to the facility without fear of discrimination or reprisal. The facility will make information on how to file a grievance available to the residents and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances that the residents may have. The facility's grievance official is responsible for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for three (#1, #3 and #5) of three residents reviewed out of 10 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #1, Resident #3 and Resident #5, who were dependent on staff for bathing, received their scheduled showers; and, -Ensure resident #5, who was dependent on staff for ADL care, received assistance with shaving. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Supporting Activities of Daily Living (ADL) policy, revised March 2018, was received from the regional director of operations (RDO) on 6/10/24 at 4:53 p.m. The policy documented in pertinent part, Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide an environment as free of accident hazards as possible and ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for four (#4, #7, #8 and #9) of five residents reviewed for accident hazards out of 10 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide supervision to prevent the elopement of Resident #4; -Investigate how Resident #4, who had a wander prevention device, eloped from the facility in order to prevent a recurrence; -Complete accurate elopement risk assessments for Resident #7 and Resident #8; -Ensure Resident #8 and Resident #9's care plans were updated to include their wander risk and wanderguards; and, -Routinely check the function of wander prevention devices for Resident #7, Resident #8 and Resident #9. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Wandering and Elopement policy, dated 2/29/24, was received from the regional director of operations (RDO) on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff performed hand hygiene with blood glucose checks; and, -Ensure glucometers were cleaned and disinfected with appropriate disinfectant contact time between uses. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Handwashing Hand Hygiene policy, revised August 2019, was received from the regional director of operations (RDO) on 6/10/24 at 4:53 p.m. The policy documented in pertinent part, Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol, or, alternatively, soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the following situations: Before and after direct contact with residents, before performing any non-surgical invasive procedures, before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during resident care, after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-11 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a facility assessment which included all resources, education, staff competencies and facility based risk assessments. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Facility Assessment policy, dated October 2018, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/11/23 at 4:38 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, A facility assessment is conducted annually to determine and update our capacity to meet the needs of and competently care for our residents during day-to-day operations. Determining our capacity to meet the needs of and care for our residents during emergencies is included in this assessment. The facility assessment includes a detailed review of the resident population. The facility assessment also includes a detailed review of the resources available to meet the needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective quality assurance program to identify and address facility compliance concerns was implemented, in order to facilitate improvement in the lives of nursing home residents, through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life and resident safety. Specifically, the quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program committee failed to: -Obtain committee feedback; collect data; monitor adverse events; identify areas for improvement; prioritize improvement activities; implement corrective and preventative actions; and conduct performance improvement projects related to problem-prone areas identified; and, -Address concerns related to the facility's failure to provide pneumonia vaccines as requested and per physician's orders. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy, dated 9/29/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/4/23 at 9:30 a.m., it read in part: Purpose: (facility name) have an ongoing Quality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the possible development and transmission of infectious diseases. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure tracking, offering and administration of the COVID-19 vaccination; -Ensure professional standards of infection control were followed while cleaning resident rooms and resident room bathrooms, so they did not contaminate surfaces with water from the inside of the toilet bowl; -Ensure razors and sharps were disposed of properly in a biohazard container; -Ensure that foley catheter care and incontinence care were performed in a sanitary manner; and, -Ensure a used suction canister was disposed of in a sanitary manner. Findings include: I. Tracking of COVID-19 vaccinations for residents A. Facility policy and procedure The Immunization policy, dated 7/28/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures related to pneumococcal immunizations for 12 (#6, #59, #42, #47, #76, #75, #17, #35, #5, #27, #232 and #233) of 12 residents reviewed for immunizations out of 40 sample residents. Specifically the facility failed to: -Offer Resident #6 an annual influenza vaccination; -Offer Resident #59 and Resident #75 a pneumococcal vaccination upon admission; -Ensure Resident #42, Resident #47, Resident #76 and Resident #5's electronic medical records (EMR) were up to date with immunization records; -Determine if additional doses of the pneumococcal vaccination were needed and offer the additional doses of the pneumococcal vaccination as needed to Resident #42, Resident #47, Resident #76, Resident #35, Resident #5, Resident #232 and Resident #233; and, -Document declination forms, document risk versus benefit education and re-offer the pneumococcal vaccination annually for Resident #6, Resident #75, Resident #17 and Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain emergency response carts and equipment in safe operating condition for four of four emergency (crash) carts. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff completed daily equipment checks; -Ensure expired items were removed from the crash cart; -Ensure missing items were replaced on the crash cart; -Ensure staff knew how to open the crash carts; and, -Ensure staff were trained on how to use the emergency oxygen cylinders. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to [NAME], [NAME], (2022). Crash cart preparedness and failure to rescue Retrieved on 12/14/23, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360555126_Crash_cart_preparedness_and_Failure_to_rescue_A_case_study_review and read in pertinent part, A crash cart is a mobile cabinet on wheels that contains equipment required for emergency cardio-pulmonary resuscitation. The carts are individualized and conveniently located throughout healthcare facilities for rapid access…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-11 · tag F0943 — widespreadGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide training to their staff that at a minimum educates staff on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property as set forth, procedures for reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property and resident abuse prevention; for 17 of 17 nursing staff hired between 10/1/23 and 12/6/23 out of 49 nursing staff members. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that 11 certified nurse aides (CNA) (#4, #8, #10, #13, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21), four resident aides (RA) (#1, #2, #3 and #4) one registered nurse (RN) (#6) and one licensed practical nurse (LPN) (#2) received training on abuse identification, prevention and reporting. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedures The Staff Training policy, revised 6/4/19, was provided by the corporate nurse consultant (CNC) on 12/11/23 at 10:49 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part The community recognizes the importance of having a skilled workforce in order to achieve…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-11 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain a mandatory effective training program for all staff, which includes, at a minimum, training on the facility's quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program, including the goals and various elements of the program, how the facility intends to implement the program the staff's role in the facility's QAPI program and how to communicate concerns, problems or opportunities for improvement to the facility's quality assessment and assurance (QAA) committee for 17 of 17 nursing staff hired between 10/4/23 and 12/6/23 out of 49 nursing staff members. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that 11 certified nurse aides (CNA) (#4, #8, #10, #13, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21); four resident aide (RA) (#1, #2, #3 and #4); one registered nurse (RN) (#6); and, one licensed practical nurse (LPN) (#2) received training on the facility's QAPI program. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Quality Management Plan/Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan policy, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-11 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespreadProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all staff, which includes, at a minimum, training on behavioral health based on requirements and as outlined in the facility's assessment, for 17 of 17 nursing staff hired between 10/4/23 and 12/6/23 out of 49 nursing staff members. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that 11 certified nurse aides (CNA) (#4, #8, #10, #13, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21), four resident aides (RA) (#1, #2, #3 and #4), one registered nurse (RN) (#6) and one licensed practical nurse (LPN) (#2) received training on behavioral health issues to include care specific to the individual needs of residents that are diagnosed with dementia and how to promote meaningful activities which promote engagement and positive meaningful relationships. Cross-reference F744 failure to provide dementia focused care. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Dementia Clinical Protocol, revised November 2018, was provided by the clinical nurse consultant (CNC) on 12/11/23 at 3:52 p.m. It…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-11 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to effectively address the care and treatment needs of residents in the secured dementia care unit for the residents to attain or maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; and provide person-centered care for three (#30, #40 and #4) of three residents reviewed for dementia care out of 40 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide the residents living in the Mountain View South with consistent and engaging activity programming of interest that was meaningful and person-centered. Additionally, the facility failed for Residents #30, #47 and #4 to: -Identify, address, and/or obtain necessary services to effectively meet the interests of the residents; and, -Implement person-centered approaches for residents with a dementia diagnosis to alleviate boredom and reduce the risk of the development of negative and or aggressive behaviors. Findings include: I. Facility policy The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#5) of one resident reviewed for grievances out of 40 sample residents was provided prompt efforts by the facility to resolve grievances. Specifically, the facility failed to provide a resolution to Resident #5's grievance, which the resident had communicated to staff on multiple occasions. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Grievance policy, dated 5/8/23, was provided by the corporate director of clinical risk management (CDCRM) on 12/11/23 at 10:49 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, To provide residents and responsible party with information on the facility grievance procedure. To ensure that residents are afforded their right to file a grievance without discrimination or reprisal and that such grievance shall be responded promptly and in written form. Administrator's review: the Grievance and Complaint Investigation Report must be filed with the administrator within five (5) working days of the receipt of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse, neglect and exploitation for two (#30 and #75) of two residents in two allegations of abuse reviewed out of 40 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent: -Resident #30 from being a victim of physical abuse by Resident #47; and, -Resident #75 from being a victim of physical abuse by Resident #12. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Abuse policy, dated 5/3/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/4/23 at 9:36 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part: Community does not condone resident abuse and shall take every precaution possible to prevent resident abuse by anyone, including staff members, other residents, volunteers, and staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members, legal guardians, resident representative, sponsors, friends, or any other individuals. Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to report alleged violations of potential abuse to the proper authority, including the policy and state oversight agency in accordance with state law for one alleged violations; involving one (#12) of one resident reviewed for allegations of abuse out of 40 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to report one allegation of resident abuse by staff to the facility administrator, director of nursing, local police or the State Agency, in a timely manner. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse policy, dated 5/3/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/4/23 at approximately 9:35 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Reporting abuse: If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law. Reporting can be completed verbally or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide services for one (#6) of two reviewed out of 40 sample residents according to professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #6 vital signs-blood pressure and heart rate/pulse were monitored and assessed for irregularities immediately before the administration of a blood pressure medication. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to Khashayar, F., [NAME], J. (2022). Beta Blockers. Stat Pearls. National Library of Medicine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532906 retrieved on 12/19/23. Beta receptors are found all over the body and induce a broad range of physiologic effects. The blockade of these receptors with beta-blocker medications can lead to many adverse effects. Bradycardia (low heart rate) and hypotension (low blood pressure) are two adverse effects that may commonly occur. The patient's heart rate and blood pressure require monitoring while using…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-11 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge plan for two (#60 and #78) out of three residents reviewed for discharge planning out of 40 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the discharge planning process was documented in Resident #60 and Resident #78's medical record. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Discharge Planning policy, revised 5/17/23, was provided by the corporate director of clinical risk management (CDCRM) on 12/11/23 at 10:49 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, The facility will support each resident in the exercise of his or her right to participate in his or her care and treatment, including planning for discharge. The facility will evaluate the resident's expected goals for discharge upon admission, then routinely in accordance with the MDS assessment cycle and as needed. Initial information and discharge goals will be included in the resident's baseline care plan. Subsequent information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were properly stored and labeled in one of two medication carts and two of four medication refrigerators. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure that expired medications were removed from the medication carts and disposed of in a safe manner; -Ensure that an open tuberculin vial was dated upon opening; and -Ensure that an expired Pneumovax 23 vaccine was removed from the medication refrigerator in a timely manner. Findings include: I. Professional reference Sanofi Pasteur. (2020). Package insert. Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (PPD)(Mantoux): Tubersol. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). https://www.fda.gov/media/74866/download, retrieved on 12/14/23 at 9:52 a.m. read in pertinent part, A vial of Tubersol (tuberculin PPD) which has been entered and in use for 30 days should be discarded. Do not use it after the expiration date. Merck & Co., Inc. (2023). Package insert. Pneumovax 23. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-11 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide food that accommodated resident preferences for one (#58) of two residents out of 40 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to offer food choices according to resident preferences for Resident #58. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Resident Food Preferences policy, revised July 2017, was provided by the corporate director of clinical risk management (CDCRM) on 12/11/23 at 10:49 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Individual food preferences will be assessed upon admission and communicated to the interdisciplinary team (IDT). When possible, staff will interview the resident directly to determine current food preferences based on history and life patterns related to food and meal times. Nursing staff will document the resident's food and eating preference in the care plan. II. Resident Representative Interview The resident's representative was interviewed on 12/4/23 at 3:27 p.m. He said that the facility only…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean and comfortable homelike environment in their rooms. Specifically, the facility did not facilitate the necessary housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain the resident rooms on two of five halls in a sanitary and comfortable manner. Findings include: I. Facility policies and procedures The Maintenance Service policy, revised December 2009, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 8/2/23 at 3:29 p.m. The policy revealed that services should be provided to all areas of the building, grounds, and equipment. The maintenance personnel should maintain the facility in compliance with current federal, state and local laws, regulations and guidelines. The facility should be maintained in good repair and free from hazards. The maintenance director was responsible for developing and maintaining a schedule of maintenance service, to assure that the buildings, grounds, and equipment were maintained in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the highest practicable quality of care for one (#10) of three out of eight sample residents that were reviewed for falls and post-fall assessments. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure neurological assessments were started and completed for Resident #10's three unwitnessed falls in his room. On 4/24/23, the resident sustained fractures of the left frontal process of the maxilla (a major bone of the face below the nose that forms the upper jaw) and nasal bones. The resident also had a laceration and a contusion to the forehead. On 4/28/23, the resident fell and did not sustain any injuries. On 7/21/23, the resident sustained a contusion with a laceration to his forehead. Neurological assessments were not conducted following any of these falls to identify potential head injuries. Findings include: I. Facility policies and procedures The Neurological Check Sheet, undated, was provided by the director or nursing (DON) on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food items were stored and served under sanitary conditions. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure proper cleaning of the facility ice machines located in the main kitchen and main dining room according to manufacturer recommendations and facility policy. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Food and Drug Administration (2017), retrieved on 8/30/22, from, https://www.fda.gov/downloads/food/guidanceregulation/retailfoodprotection/foodcode/ucm595140.pdf. Read in pertinent part: The presence of food debris or dirt on nonfood contact surfaces may provide a suitable environment for the growth of microorganisms which employees may inadvertently transfer to food. If these areas are not kept clean, they may also provide harborage for insects, rodents, and other pests. -Proper maintenance of equipment to manufacturer specifications helps ensure that it will continue to operate as designed. Failure to properly maintain equipment could lead to violations of the associated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-08-25 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective program of pest management. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the main kitchen, dining room, resident rooms and hallways were free from flies. Findings include: I. Professional references According to the State Board of Health Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations (last amended 1/1/19) page 186, retrieved on 8/30/22, from https://cdphe.colorado.gov/retail-food/retail-food-resources The premises shall be maintained free of insects, rodents, and other pests. The presence of insects, rodents, and other pests shall be controlled to eliminate their presence on the premises by: -Routinely inspecting incoming shipments of food and supplies -Routinely inspecting the premises for evidence of pests -Using methods, if pests are found, such as trapping devices or other means of pest control as specified under; and -Eliminating harborage conditions. According to the Center for Disease Control's (CDC) Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Health-Care Facilities,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-25 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#225, #49, #35) of five residents with dementia out of 38 sample residents, received the appropriate treatment and services to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed to develop person-centered interventions to prevent the resident to resident altercations. Resident #225 was admitted to facility from another facility with known behaviors of sexual abuse towards female residents on his prior memory care unit. Upon admission, the resident was assessed by a medical director, who recommended increasing the number of staff on the secure unit to monitor the resident for his behaviors. He communicated his recommendations to the nursing home administrator (NHA). The facility stated that admitting to an all-male unit would mitigate resident's behaviors and did not put any additional steps in place to protect the other residents on the unit. Cross-reference F600 for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment where resident's equipment necessary for the completion of activities of daily living was free from the potential spread of disease causing organisms for five (#3, #21, #57, #36, and #64) of 14 fourteen residents of 38 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Follow the facility cleaning schedule for resident wheelchairs and walkers on memory care units; -Identify and clean unsanitary wheelchairs and walkers as needed. Findings include: I. Observations On 8/25/22 at 8:15 a.m. Resident #3's wheelchair was observed while resident out of the chair. The cross bars underneath the seat of the wheelchair had an excessive collection of unknown crust, dust, lint, and black grim. The area underneath the resident wheelchair cushion was soiled with dirty napkins, food wrappers and utensils. On 8/25/22 at 8:20 a.m. Resident #21's wheelchair was observed while the resident was out of the chair. The cross bars underneath the seat, the wheel brakes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (#8) of six out of 38 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident 8's Wanderguard was observed for placement and electronically checked for functionally as physician orders. Findings include: I. Facility policies and procedures The Elopement and Wandering Residents policy, implemented 8/24/21, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/23/22 at 10:33 a.m. The policy revealed the facility ensured that residents who exhibited wandering behaviors and/or were at risk for elopement received adequate supervision to prevent accidents, and received care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care that addressed the unique factors that contributed to wandering or elopement risk. Wandering was described as a random or repetitive locomotion that might be goal-directed or non-goal directed or aimless. Elopement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #46) of one resident out of 38 sample residents did not experience a significant medication error. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #46 received a prescribed monthly dose of long acting Haldol on three occasions (2/14/22 or 3/14/22 and 7/4/22), as ordered by the resident's physician. I. Professional reference According to [NAME] Nursing Drug Handbook 2020, Kizior, R. J. and [NAME], K.J., St. Louis Missouri 2020, revealed the following pharmaceutical information: -Page (pp). 561-563 read in part: Haloperidol (Haldol). Classification: First generation antipsychotic. Clinical: antipsychotic, .Uses: treatment of schizophrenia. Treats Tourette's disorder (controls tics and vocal utterances, .Management of psychotic disorder Therapeutic effect: Produces tranquilizing effects on muscle weakness. Strong extrapyramidal (involuntary muscle movements) effect.Full therapeutic effect may take up to six weeks. Side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to collaborate with the hospice provider to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of one (#53) resident out of 38 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure for Resident #53: -Communication with the resident's hospice provider to obtain the providers care plan and treatment notes; and, -Failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to include the hospice provider's plan of care. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Hospice Services Facility Agreement policy, dated 2022, provided by the corporate nurse consultant (CNC) #2 on 8/25/22 at 3:40 p.m. read in pertinent part: It is the policy of this facility to provide and/or arrange for hospice services in order to protect a resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with, and access to, persons and services inside and outside the facility. The facility will, under a written agreement, ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$71,640 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $28,780 — penalty dated 2025-07-15
- $30,862 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
- $3,529 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
- $8,469 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.2 | -2.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHOHAN, JAMEEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
| JORGENSEN, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 05/24/2024 |
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/24/2024 |
| GRAHAM, JOSEPH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 05/24/2024 |
| KEETCH, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2011 |
| SATO, AMI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/09/2024 |
| HRIBAR, KENNETH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/14/2025 |
| ENSIGN SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
| SMV PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065278. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.