Sonterra Health Center
18514 Sonterra Place, San Antonio, TX 78258 · Government - Hospital district · 124 certified beds · (210) 545-4800 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $80,964 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-25)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.6% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.8% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.8% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.6% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.5% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.9% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.3% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.9% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.3% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.2% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.9% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.2% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.6% | 12.3% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.88 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.54 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 160 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 85.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.84 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.9%CMS range 46.3–60.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 7.7–13.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 85.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 77.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 80.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.8–10.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.91 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 101.8 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for significant medication errors, in that: The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 was administered Touch U-200 (long-acting insulin) and Novo Log (rapid-acting insulin) for 2 days from 3/12/25 to 3/14/25. The resident was sent to the hospital, admitted and diagnosed with Diabetic [NAME] Acidosis. The non-compliance was identified as IJ past non-compliance. The noncompliance began on 3/12/2025 and ended on 3/17/25. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. This failure placed resident at risk for adverse side effects, and life-threatening complications . Findings include: Record review of resident #1's face sheet dated 3/20/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dependence on renal dialysis (an illness where kidneys don't function, and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for Care Plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was receiving assistance with eating as detailed in his Care Plan and was left unsupervised in his room during the evening meal on 8/6/24. Resident #1 was pronounced deceased at the facility on 8/6/24. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was receiving assistance with eating as detailed in her Care Plan. On 8/11/24 at 12:13 pm an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the immediacy was removed on 8/12/24 at 7:42 pm, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure placed all residents at risk for weight loss, malnutrition, and/or dehydration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 8 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not left unsupervised in his room during the evening meal on 8/6/24. Resident #1 was pronounced deceased at the facility on 8/6/24. On 8/9/24 at 4:21 pm an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the immediacy was removed on 8/12/24 at 7:42 pm, the facility remained out of compliance at scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure placed all residents at risk for serious injury, harm, and/or death due to lack of appropriate supervision. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 8/9/24, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the right for a resident to refuse or discontinue treatment for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #155) whose records were reviewed for resident rights. LVN H/Treatment Nurse, failed to stop wound treatment after Resident #155 yelled out in pain multiple times for her to stop on 5/13/25. This deficient practice could affect any resident and could result in residents believing their right to say stop does not matter. The findings were: Review of Resident #155's face sheet, dated 5/14/25, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Metabolic Encephalopathy (according to Cleveland Clinic: it is a change in how your brain works due to an underlying condition. It can cause confusion, memory loss and loss of consciousness) and Heart Failure. Review of Resident #155's, initial admission record, dated 5/8/25, revealed she was alert, but confused, oriented to person and able to follow simple commands. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-05-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #155) whose records were reviewed for pain management. LVN H/Treatment Nurse, failed to ensure Resident #155 received a PRN pain medication prior to assessment Resident #155 and then failed to stop wound treatment when Resident #155 yelled out in pain multiple times for her to stop on 5/13/25. This deficient practice could affect any resident experiencing pain and undue pain and mental distress. The findings were: Review of Resident #155's face sheet, dated 5/14/25, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Metabolic Encephalopathy (according to Cleveland Clinic: it is a change in how your brain works due to an underlying condition. It can cause confusion,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication storage:The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not have a medication cup with pills and a medication cup with a medication in powder form at the bedside.These failures could affect residents who received medications in the facility and place them at risk for not receiving the correct medications, medication misuse or drug diversion.The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet date 6/17/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes (condition in which the body does not use insulin properly), muscle weakness, dementia (decline in memory, thinking, and reasoning abilities that is severe enough to interfere with daily life), prostatic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with State and Federal Laws for 1 of 4 medication carts (300 hall medication cart) reviewed for storage of drugs and biologicals.The facility failed to ensure the medication cart for 300 hall was locked and secured when it was unattended.This failure could place residents at risk of medication misuse or drug diversion.Findings included:During an observation on 06/07/2026 from 8:58 a.m. to 9:01 a.m. on 300 hall there was an unlocked medication cart by the workstation, with the lock sticking out in the fullest position. Observation revealed the drawers to the medication cart were towards the hallway and anyone who walked by could open the drawers. There was no nurse within sight of the unlocked medication cart and 2 residents were sitting in wheel chairs about 6 feet away from the unlocked medication cart. CNA B walked by the unattended, unlocked medication cart as he pushed a meal cart down the hallway.During an observation and interview on 06/07/2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #150) who were reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure Resident #150 had clothes to wear while providing physical therapy out in the hallway. This deficient practice could affect any resident and contribute to feelings of dissatisfaction or poor self-esteem. The findings were: Review of Resident #150's face sheet, dated 5/15/25, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Infection and inflammatory reaction due to other cardiac and vascular devices, implants and grafts, subsequent encounter and Cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #150's initial admission record, dated 5/4/25, revealed he was alert, oriented to time able to follow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #8) who were observed for call light placement. The facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for Resident #8. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of keeping them from calling for help as needed. The findings were: Record review of Resident #8's face sheet, dated 05/15/2025, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia (a general term for a progressive decline in mental abilities, impacting memory, thinking, and reasoning to the point of interfering with daily life), unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, unspecified lack of coordination, unsteadiness on feet, unspecified diastolic (congestive) heart failure (occurs when the left ventricle, the heart's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to voice grievances to include those with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished, the behavior of staff and of other residents, and other concerns regarding their LTC facility stay, for 1 of 8 residents (Residents #259) reviewed for grievances. On 5/10/2025 Resident #259 made a grievance to the cook to which he did not document and/or report the grievance. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by leaving residents with frustration and demoralization. The findings included: A record review of Resident #259's admission record dated 5/15/2025 revealed Resident #259 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A record review of Resident #259's care plan dated 5/8/2025 revealed, [sic(Resident #259)] is at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations , interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure alleged violations involving abuse or mistreatment were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involved abuse or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures, for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #259 ) reviewed for reporting alleged verbal abuse. On Monday 5/12/2025 Resident #259 reported to the assistant food service manager (AFSM) that on Saturday 5/10/2025 the cook was rude and yelled while in his room reviewing the lunch meal served. The AFSM did not report the alleged verbal abuse and or mistreatment. The failure could place residents at risk for verbal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations , interviews and record reviews the facility failed to have evidence that all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, were thoroughly investigated, for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #259 reviewed for investigating alleged verbal abuse. On Monday 5/12/2025 Resident #259 reported to the assistant food service manager (AFSM) that on Saturday 5/10/2025 the cook was rude and yelled while in his room reviewing the lunch meal served. The AFSM did not report the alleged verbal abuse and or mistreatment. The facility did not investigate the allegation of verbal abuse. The failure could place residents at risk for verbal abuse. The findings included: A record review of Resident #259's admission record dated 5/15/2025 revealed Resident #259 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A record review of Resident #259's care plan dated 5/8/2025 revealed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS System for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #84) reviewed for MDS transmission. Resident #84's discharge MDS assessment was completed but not transmitted within 14 days of completion. This failure could place residents at risk of not having assessments completed and submitted in a timely manner as required. The findings were: Review of Resident #84's face sheet, dated 05/15/2025, revealed an admission date of 12/15/2024 and a discharge date of 12/20/2024, with diagnoses that included: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (high level of sugar in the blood), Hyperlipidemia (Elevated level of any or all lipids(fat) in the blood), Post-traumatic stress disorder ( psychiatric condition that may occur in people who have experienced or witnessed a traumatic event or series of traumatic events). Review of Resident #84's Discharge MDS Assessment, dated 12/20/2024, revealed the assessment had been completed but not transmitted to CMS. During an interview on 05/15/2025 at 1:37 p.m. MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 2 of 4 Residents (Resident 150 and Resident #155) whose records were reviewed. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #150's baseline CP included the use of side rails. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #155's baseline CP included the use of side rails. This deficient practice could affect any resident and contribute to residents not having their needs met based on their assessment. The findings were: 1. Review of Resident #150's face sheet, dated 5/15/25, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Infection and inflammatory reaction due to other cardiac and vascular devices, implants and grafts, subsequent encounter and Cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #150's initial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that included measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs for 1 of 6 Residents #Resident #21 whose records were reviewed. The facility failed to include the use of 1/2 side rails on Resident #21's Care Plan since his admission, 3/28/25. This deficient practice could affect any resident and contribute to residents not having their needs met according to their assessment. The findings were: Review of Resident #21's face sheet, dated 5/15/25, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Metabolic Encephalopathy (according to Cleveland Clinic: it is a change in how your brain works due to an underlying condition. It can cause confusion, memory loss and loss of consciousness}, Muscle weakness (generalized), Other lack of coordination and Other abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 7 Residents (Resident #80) whose environment was reviewed for safety hazards. Nursing staff failed to remove 3 razors from Resident #80's bathroom. This deficient practice could affect residents exposed to the razors and could contribute to avoidable accidents. The findings were: Review of Resident #80's face sheet, dated 5/15/25, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Vascular Dementia and Visual Hallucinations. Review of Resident #80's MDS assessment, dated 3/27/25, revealed his BIMS was 8 of 15 reflective of moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #80's Care Plan, revised on 1/2/25 revealed he was at risk for impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes r/t Dementia. Interventions included COMMUNICATION: Identify yourself at each interaction. Face when speaking and make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #80) whose records were reviewed for CPAP care. Nursing staff failed to store Resident #80's CPAP mask in a plastic bag and failed to clean it per facility policy. This deficient practice could affect residents with respiratory needs and could contribute to upper respiratory infections. The findings were: Review of Resident #80's face sheet, dated 5/15/25, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Vascular Dementia (according to microsoft [NAME]: type of dementia caused by problems in the blood supply to the brain, resulting from a cerebrovascular disease) and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (People with obstructive sleep apnea repeatedly stop and start breathing while they sleep). Review of Resident #80's MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation. Review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation for 2 of 6 Residents (Resident #21 and Resident #153) whose records were reviewed for the use of side rails. 1. Nursing staff failed to obtain physician orders, a consent, and did not make other efforts prior to the implementing the use of SRs for Resident #21. 2. Nursing staff failed to obtain physician orders and a consent for the use of SRs for Resident #153. These deficient practices could affect any resident and could contribute to unavoidable accidents. The findings were: 1. Review of Resident #21's face sheet, dated 5/15/25, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Metabolic Encephalopathy (according to Cleveland Clinic: it is a change in how your brain works due to an underlying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs without adequate indications for its use for 1 of 6 Resident (Resident #151) whose records were reviewed. Nursing staff failed to obtain a consent from Resident #151's family representative for the use of Hydorxyzine (used for anxiety). This deficient practice could affect any resident who received psychotropic medications and could contribute to the use of unnecessary medications. Review of Resident #151's face sheet, dated 5/15/25, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including unspecified Dementia. Review of Resident #151's physician orders for May 2025 revealed an order hydrOXYzine HCl Oral Tablet 25 MG (HydrOXYzine HCl) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for anxiety for 14 Days. Review of Resident #151's MAR for May 2025 revealed Resident #151 received HydrOXYzine from 05/12/25 to 05/15/25. Review of Resident #151's consent form for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biological were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #150) reviewed for medications storage. During medications administration, LVN A left medications at bedside of Resident #150. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of misappropriation of medications or harm due to accidental ingestion of medications. The findings included: Record review of Resident #150's face sheet, dated 05/14/2025, revealed an admission date of 05/04/2025, with diagnoses which included: Cirrhosis of liver (permanent scarring that damages the liver and interferes with its functioning) , Dysphagia (Difficulty swallowing), Hyperlipidemia (Elevated level of any or all lipids(fat) in the blood), Hypertension (High blood pressure), Chronic kidney disease stage 3 (gradual loss of kidney function). Review of MDS log revealed Resident #150's admission assessment was not due yet. Review of BIMS assessment, dated 05/05/2025, revealed Resident #150 had a BIMS score of 9 and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #23 and #150) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. While administering medications for Resident #23, MA B did not sanitize the mobile blood pressure machine. 2. While Administering medications for Resident #150, LVN A did not sanitize of wash her hands between change of gloves. LVN A did not change her gloves prior to start care on Resident #150 These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. These findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 05/14/2025, revealed an admission date of 12/21/2021, and a readmission date of 09/22/2024, with diagnoses which included: Dementia (decline in cognitive abilities), Major depressive disorder (mental disorder characterized by at least two weeks…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to prepare a comprehensive care plan that included to the extent practicable, the participation of the resident and the resident's representative(s) and failed to review and revise resident care plans after each assessment, for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1 and #2) reviewed for care plan revision/timing. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had quarterly care plan reviews in February 2024 and May 2024 (2 out of 5), and Resident #2 had quarterly care plan reviews in March 2024, June 2024 and January 2025 (3 out of 6). This failure could affect residents care/services and may cause a delay in treatment and/or decline in health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 04/23/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted [DATE] with diagnoses to include muscle wasting and atrophy, personal history of urinary (tract) infections, and mild cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medical records were kept in accordance with professional standards and practices and were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accuracy of records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had documented weekly skin evaluations per the facility policy on 6 out of 7 occasions (08/24/24, 08/31/24, 09/07/24, 09/14/24, 09/21/24, 09/28/24) from 08/21/24 to 10/05/24. This failure could place residents at risk for improper care due to inaccurate records. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 04/23/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted [DATE] with diagnoses to include muscle wasting and atrophy, personal history of urinary (tract) infections, and mild cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 03/25/25, revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 7 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures, for 1 of 3 Residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Neglect, in that: The facility did not report an allegation of neglect per facility policy to the State Survey Agency (HHSC) when a medication error for Resident # 1 occurred. This deficient practice could affect any resident and could contribute to further neglect. The findings were: Record review of Resident # 1's face sheet dated 3/20/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dependence on renal dialysis (an illness where kidneys don't function, and a machine is required to filter blood through an artificial kidney), diabetes type 1 ( Illness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys, for 1 of 4 medication carts (400 hall medication cart) reviewed for drug security. The 400 Hall nurse's medication cart was left unattended with a blister package of medication Tamulosin HCL for Resident #4 on top of the cart. This failure could place residents at risk for misappropriation of property and could place residents at risk for accidents, hazards, and not receiving therapeutic effects. The findings included: Record review of Resident #4's admission Record (face sheet), dated 9/14/24, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (an enlarged prostate) and history of lung cancer. Record review of Resident #4's Physician Order Summary, dated 09/14/2024, revealed an order for Tamulosin HCL capsule 0.4 mg give 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-14 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to post the following information on a daily basis: Facility name, the current date, the total number, and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: Registered nurses, Licensed practical nurses, Certified nurse aides, and Resident census. For 1 of 1 daily nursing staff posting. The facility failed to coordinate the generation and posting of the nursing daily staffing report. This deficient practice could deny residents and visitors nurse staffing information readily available in a readable format at any given time. The findings included: During an observation on 06/13/2024 at 01:00 AM revealed the facility's Daily Nursing Care Hours public posting hung on the wall behind the nurse's station. Further observation revealed the posting was dated Tuesday 06/11/2024. During an interview on 06/13/2024 at 01:30 PM the ADON stated the posting should be daily. During an interview on 06/14/2024 at 06:00 PM the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys, for 3 (100 Hall medication aide cart, nurse medication cart, and treatment cart) of 8 medication and treatment carts reviewed for drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments. The 100-hall medication aide cart, the nurse medication cart, and the treatment cart were unlocked and unsupervised. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by unsecured and uncontrolled medications. The findings included: During an observation on 06/13/2024 at 12:51 AM revealed the 100-hall nurse LVN A seated at the nurses' station documenting at the computer. Further observation revealed the medication aide cart, nurse medication cart, and treatment cart positioned at the near end of the 100-hall. All 3 carts were observed to be out of LVN A's line of sight. All 3 carts were unattended and unlocked. 1 of the 3 medication carts had approximately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 10 snacks reviewed for preparation, distribution, and storage. The facility prepared and distributed sandwiches without labeling the sandwiches with the dates they were prepared and the dates the foods should not be served and thrown out. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for food borne illnesses. The findings included: During an observation on 06/13/2024 at 01:10 AM revealed a sandwich wrapped in clear plastic cling wrap stored at room temperature on a plastic tray on a wheeled shelf table. Further observation revealed the sandwich was not labeled in any fashion. During an interview on 06/13/2024 at 01:15 AM CNA B stated sandwiches were prepared and delivered to the hallway snack carts by kitchen staff. CNA B stated the sandwich on the snack cart was not labeled with any information. CNA B stated the sandwich was not safe to serve due to the lack of information. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-19 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 5 (Residents #6, #17, #19, #53 and #67) out of 24 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. 1. Facility failed to ensure Resident #6's quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 03/23/2024 reflected resident receiving hospice services. 2. Facility failed to ensure Resident #17's significant change MDS assessment with an ARD of 03/12/2024 reflected resident receiving hospice services. 3. Resident #19's quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 04/01/2024 inaccurately reflected her pressure sore status, interventions, and treatments as none when she had a Stage 3 (full thickness tissue loss) pressure sore to her sacrum (a shield shaped bony structure located at the base of the spine and connects the pelvis (the area of the body below the abdomen that contains the hip bones, bladder and rectum)), with interventions and treatment. 4. Resident #53's quarterly MDS assessment with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objective and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 residents (Residents #19, #53 and 127) of 24 residents reviewed for care plans. 1. Facility failed to implement Resident #19's care plan which reflected she required a floor mat beside her bed as a fall prevention. 2. Facility failed to ensure Resident #53's bowel and bladder incontinence was reflected in his comprehensive care plan with a revised date of 12/11/2023. 3. Facility failed to ensure Resident #127's hospice services were reflected in his comprehensive care plan with a revised date of 02/18/2024. These deficient practices could affect residents who required specific care, services and interventions by placing them at risk of not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 of 1 facility, reviewed for registered nurse coverage. RN 8-hour coverage was not available for 7 days in the period 11/04/23 to 12/15/23. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility by leaving staff without supervisory coverage of an RN. The findings included: Record review of facility's RN hour time sheets from November 2023 to March 2024 revealed no 8 hours of RN coverage on the following days: 11/04/23=0 hours 11/05/23=0 hours 11/18/23=0 hours 11/19/23=0 hours 11/25/23=0 hours 11/26/23=0 hours 12/07/23=0 hours 12/15/23=0 hours Interview with DON on 4/19/24 at 12:45PM revealed the facility had a scheduler that was responsible to ensure RN coverage of at least 8 hours per day. The DON stated she worked Monday to Friday 8 hours a day and covered weekends if RN hours were not covered. The DON also stated she was on-call when there was no RN on duty. The DON confirmed that there were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen observed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] I prepared the pureed pasta salad in a sanitary fashion. The facility failed to ensure insulated plate lids and insulated plate bases were air dried prior to stacking them with water droplets and meal prep. These failures could place resident who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: Observation on 04/18/2024 at 9:47 a.m. revealed DA J take the washed insulated plate lids and insulated bases after coming out of the dish washing machine and stacked them on top of each other on a 3-tiered cart without allowing them to air dry with water droplets visible on both. Observation on 04/18/2024 at 11:30 a.m. revealed the insulated plate lids and insulated bases had been moved to the serving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (Resident #56) out of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Resident #56's comprehensive care was not revised to reflect he was on an LCS/NAS regular texture diet. This deficient practice could affect residents placing them at risk for not receiving necessary care. The findings included: Record review of Resident #56's electronic face sheet dated 04/17/2024 reflected he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), syncope and collapse (fainting and passing out), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and weakness (lack of strength). Record review of Resident #56's quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 01/03/2024 reflected he scored a 04/15 on his BIMS which signified he was severely cognitively impaired. He could understand and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 2 resident (Residents #53) reviewed for incontinent care.: While providing incontinent care for Resident #53, CNA C did not return Resident #53's foreskin to the original position. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection, paraphimosis (urologic emergency in uncircumcised males) and skin break down due to improper care practices. The findings were: Record review of Resident #53's electronic face sheet dated 04/18/2024 reflected he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: epilepsy (a neurological disorder marked by sudden episodes of sensory disturbance, loss of consciousness or convulsions associated with abnormal electrical activity in the brain), unsteadiness on feet (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure personal privacy during personal care for 1 of 5 resident (Resident #1) observed for personal privacy in that: While performing the incontinent care for Resident #1, CNA A and CNA B did not ensure Resident #1's personal privacy. This deficient practice could affect residents and could result in loss of dignity and low self-esteem. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 3/20/24, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of muscle wasting and atrophy [shrinking of muscle or nerve tissue], not elsewhere classified, multiple sites, unspecified speech disturbances, history of falling, and cognitive communication deficit [difficulty communicating due to injury to the brain]. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1's BIMS score was 6, signifying severe cognitive impairment. Observation on 3/19/24 at 1:39 p.m. revealed CNA A and CNA B entered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for storage of drugs. LVN C left Resident #2's morning medications at bedside. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of medication misuse and diversion. The findings were: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 3/20/24, revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute pulmonary edema [excess fluid in the lungs], chronic kidney disease, stage 3 unspecified, history of falling, and presence of cardiac pacemaker [a device that regular's the heart's beat]. Record review of Resident #2's BIMs score, dated 3/19/24, revealed Resident #2 had a BIMS score of 15, signifying no cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #2's physician orders, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for accuracy of medical records in that: CNA D documented she gave Resident #3's clonazepam (a medication for seizures) on 2/20/24, which was after Resident #3 ran out of clonazepam on 2/19/24 and before the medication was restocked on 2/22/24. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care and treatment. The findings were: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 3/19/24, revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral palsy [a disorder that affects a person's ability to move and maintain balance and posture], unspecified, dysphagia [difficulty swallowing], unspecified, weakness, unspecified convulsions, and muscle weakness (generalized.)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, which includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 4 Residents (Resident #1 and #2), reviewed for care plan development. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's comprehensive care plan included a plan of care for a diagnoses GERD (gastro-esophageal reflux disease, also known as acid reflux), eosinophilic esophagitis (inflammation of the esophagus) and history of GI (gastro-intestinal) bleeding. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's diagnoses of hypertension/hypotension and the resident's use of midodrine (medication used to increase blood pressure) that included physician ordered parameters for administration were addressed in the care plan. This failure could place residents at risk for lack of coordination of services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #2) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was administered midodrine (a medication used to increase blood pressure) by LVN C who had dispensed the medication. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in medication administration and medication error and could result in a decline in health. The findings include: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 12/01/2023 revealed an admission date of 7/18/2023 with diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia, malignant neoplasm of colon (cancer of colon), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #2's physician order summary for November 2023 revealed an order for midodrine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's representative where there is a decision to transfer or discharge the resident from the facility for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification, in that: The facility failed to contact Resident #1's emergency contact when the resident was transferred to the hospital. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of improper discharge planning and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Closed record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute pulmonary edema (a condition caused by too much fluid in the lungs), congestive heart failure (a long-term condition whereby the heart can't pump blood well enough to supply the body a normal supply), and anxiety (the body's response to stress; a feeling of fear or apprehension about what's to come). Further review of this face sheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete; accurately documented; readily accessible; and systematically organized, for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accurate medical records, in that: Resident #1's electronic medical record revealed Resident #1's medical condition and subsequent transfer to the hospital were addressed via phone to a male family member when the resident did not have a male family member identified as an emergency contact or responsible party. This failure could cause confusion about the residents' diagnoses and care and place residents at risk for harm due to inaccurate records. The findings included: Closed record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute pulmonary edema (a condition caused by too much fluid in the lungs), congestive heart failure (a long-term condition whereby the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-02-24 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the governing body appointed an administrator who was licensed by the State, where licensing is required; responsible for management of the facility; and reports to and is accountable to the governing body for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for the governing body, in that: The governing body did not appoint an administrator (Executive Director) who was licensed by the state. This deficient practice could result in the facility not being managed in a responsible manner, which could affect the health and safety of all residents. The findings include: Record review of the Executive Director's employee file revealed the Executive Director did not have a hire date with no license present. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:20 a.m. the ED introduced himself to the survey team and stated he did not have an administrator license, however there was an administrator who goes back and forth between some of the nursing facilities. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure the reach in milk refrigerator was equipped with a temperature measuring device. 2. The facility failed to ensure utensils used for dispensing foods were stored to prevent contamination a. a metal scoop lying on the lid of a plastic container marked flour. b. a metal scoop lying in the plastic container marked sugar. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings were: 1. An observation and interview with the Dietary Supervisor on 02/21/2023 at 10:38 a.m., revealed there was no temperature measuring device in the reach in cooler for the milk. Further observation revealed a temperature log with recordings of measurements as recent as 8 am the same morning. The DS revealed the facility milk delivery comes every Tuesday morning and the thermometer had probably…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #260) whose records were reviewed for personal privacy. Staff failed to replace a window blind slat in Resident #260's room to provide privacy during personal care. This deficient practice could affect any resident and contribute to poor self-esteem and feelings of helplessness. The findings were: Review of Resident #260's face sheet, dated 2/24/23, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified fracture of shaft of humerus right arm and Cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #260's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed her BIMS was 11 (out of 15) indicating some cognitive impairment and she required extensive to total care with most ADL's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to inform all adult residents concerning the right to at the resident's option formulate an advance directive for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #41) whose records were reviewed for advance directives. The SW did not complete a DNR, advance directive, per Resident #41 and Resident #41's family representative for almost 1 month. This deficient practice could affect any resident requesting a DNR, advance directive and could result in the residents wishes not being honored. The findings were: Review of Resident #41's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of one rib, right side and Cognitive communication deficit. Further review revealed Resident #41's advance directive was CPR/full code. Review of Resident #41's admission MD'S, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #41's BIMS was 12, indicating some cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #41's Care Plan, revised on [DATE], revealed he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there is a significant change in the resident's physical status for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #41) whose records were reviewed for change of condition, in that: ADON did not consult with Resident #41's doctor and the representative responsible party when Resident #41 experienced a significant weight loss. This deficient practice could affect any resident and could contribute to necessary parties not being able to assist with interventions contributing to the residents' health. The findings were: Review of Resident #41's face sheet, dated 2/24/23, revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of one rib, right side and Cognitive communication deficit. Further review revealed Resident #41's advance directive was CPR, full code. Review of Resident #41's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, neglect. The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse, neglect, and mistreatment made by Resident #1 to the State Survey Agency. This failure could put residents at risk of abuse, neglect, and mistreatment. The findings included: Closed record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 2/24/23 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 9/7/22. Diagnoses included unspecified fracture of first lumbar vertebra, subsequent encounter for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, to have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to complete an investigation of allegations made by Resident #1 for abuse, neglect, and mistreatment. This failure could place resident at risk of abuse, neglect, and mistreatment. The findings included: Closed record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 2/24/23 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 9/7/22. Diagnoses included unspecified fracture of first lumbar vertebra, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, unspecified lack of coordination, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit (impairment in organization/thought organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving), weakness, and type 2 diabetes mellitus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for the resident, with no interventions to attain or maintain the resident's highest practical physical, mental and psychosocial well-being, for 2 of 12 residents (Resident #41, Resident #44) reviewed for comprehensive care plans, in that: 1. Nursing staff failed to update Resident #41's comprehensive care plan after experiencing a significant weight loss. 2. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that addressed Resident #44's communication language barrier in relation to being an Arabic speaker. These deficient practices could affect resident at the facility who require a care plan and place them at risk for not receiving the appropriate care and services needed to maintain optimal health. The findings included: 1. Review of Resident #41's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #41) whose record was reviewed for weight loss. Nursing staff failed to implement their weight loss protocol and intervention measures when Resident #41 experienced a significant weight loss. This deficient practice could affect any resident and could result in residents' continued weight loss and decline in physical health. The findings were: Review of Resident #41's face sheet, dated 2/24/23, revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of one rib, right side, Chronic Systolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Malignant Neoplasm of Rectum and Cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #41's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #41's BIMS was 12 (out of 15), indicating some cognitive impairment and he required supervision and setup by 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #261) whose records were reviewed for oxygen care. Nursing staff failed to ensure Resident #261's filter on the oxygen concentrator was clean and free of lint build up. In addition, the oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle were not dated on the date they were changed out. This deficient practice could affect residents who received oxygen therapy and could contribute to difficulty breathing; shortness of breath and ultimately a decline in physical condition. The findings were: Review of Resident #261's face sheet, dated 2/24/23, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (below-normal level of oxygen in your blood). Review of Resident #261's electronic medical record revealed her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-24 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 1 (Resident #31) reviewed for hospice services, in that: The facility failed to obtain Resident #31's most recent hospice Plan of Care, Hospice Consent and Election Form and Physician Certification of Terminal Illness. This failure could place the resident who received hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs. The findings were: Record review of Resident #31's face sheet, dated 02/22/2023, revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$80,964 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-04-25
- $14,901 — penalty dated 2025-03-21
- $48,718 — penalty dated 2024-08-14
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-13 for 2 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.2 | -2.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASHTON, ANDREW | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2017 |
| MANSOOR, SAAD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/29/2019 |
| ALEXANDER, ALMA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 05/27/2020 |
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 04/01/2017 |
| KEETCH, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2011 |
| BRACKENRIDGE HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2017 |
| ENSIGN SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2016 |
| NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2017 |
| TEXAS NHI INVESTORS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676158. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.