Hillcrest Health Care Center
2121 Avenue L, Hawarden, IA 51023 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 64 certified beds · (712) 551-1074 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (73) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $130,305 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-26)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (75%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.3% | 17.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.3% | 4.6% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 2.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.0% | 4.2% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.1% | 3.8% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.8% | 16.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.8% | 20.8% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.9% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.6% | 4.2% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.3% | 25.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.5% | 19.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 43.5% | 73.3% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.32 | 1.49 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.87 | 2.08 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.1%CMS range 7.4–16.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 85.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.05 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 53.6 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 75% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
73 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 60 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-28 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and diet orders the facility failed to assure the food was prepared and appropriate to meet resident's needs according to their assessment, diet orders and care plan. Observations determined that 3 residents did not get the food in their ordered texture and 2 of the 3 residents have an order for an altered diet and are identified as moderately impaired cognition, (Resident #5, #6 and #7). This failure resulted in residents receiving Immediate Jeopardy to the health, safety, and security of the resident. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of July 25, 2024 on July 26, 2024 at 4:07 p.m. The Facility Staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on July 26, 2024 through the following actions: a. Staff education was provided to the individual's passing meals on 7/25/24. b. The dietary manager was also re-educated on all diets on 7/25/24. c. All diets were reviewed and dietary cards were updated with new pictures and new diets on 7/25/24. d. The dietary staff were all reeducated about appropriate diets by the administrator on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and diet orders the facility failed to assure the food was prepared and appropriate to meet resident's needs according to their assessment, diet orders and care plan. Observations determined that 5 residents, (Residents #11, #15, #26, #27 and #34) did not get the food in their ordered texture and 3 of the 5 residents that have an order for an altered diet are identified as moderately impaired cognition and 1 resident did have an episode of choking from being served the incorrect diet on 10/14/23. This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy to the health, safety, and security of the resident. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of October 14, 2023 on January 24, 2024 at 3:26 p.m The Facility Staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on January 24, 2024 through the following actions: a. All dietary staff have been educated on preparing food for each resident based on diet order that is written on individual dietary cards and updated by all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-03-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility record review, resident and resident family interviews, staff interviews and facility policy the facility failed to appropriately implement interventions to protect 2 out of 3 residents (Resident #3 and #50) reviewed from abuse. The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #3 documented diagnoses of muscle weakness, stroke and diabetes mellitus. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of facility provided Incident Report dated 3/8/26 at 3:21 p.m., revealed Staff I, Registered Nurse (RN) was at the nursing station paging at about 3:21 p.m., to get update on another resident when caregiver came up to nurse and stated, just letting you know Resident #2 was in this resident room attempting to get in bed with her. This writer hung up and immediately rushed down the hall with a caregiver. Staff I met Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide dignity to residents during personal care for 2 of 13 residents (Residents #1, #7). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings Include: 1. Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicating normal cognition. The MDS documented the resident required partial/moderate assistance with toilet hygiene. The document indicated the resident was continent of bowel and bladder. The MDS revealed diagnoses of lymphedema, morbid obesity and other disorders of electrolyte and fluid imbalance. The Care Plan revised 4/3/26 identified the resident had self care deficits directing staff the resident required 2-4 staff for toilet transfers, and used disposable briefs.On 5/4/26 at 3:00 PM Resident #1 stated she felt like she had not been provided with dignity and respect during personal care during the overnight shift. The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to complete skin assessments to include measurements and wound status for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #1 and #2) reviewed with pressure ulcers. The facility also failed to sign out wound treatment orders and being completed for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed with pressure ulcers. The facility reported a census of 50 residents.Findings include:According to Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 4/23/2026, she had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12. A BIMS score of 12 suggested mild cognitive impairment. The MDS documented she had two unstageable pressure ulcers/injuries present on admission. The following diagnoses were documented for Resident #1: lymphedema, respiratory failure, morbid obesity, persistent mood (affective) disorder, sleep apnea, venous insufficiency, and cellulitis of left lower limb.The Care Plan Focus Area with an initiated date of 3/2/2026 documented Resident #1 had impaired skin integrity. The Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record, observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #12, #13) reviewed, requiring the use of oxygen. The facility failed to provide oxygen as documented in the physician orders. The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #12 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS recorded diagnoses of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The MDS revealed the resident utilized oxygen while a resident and during the last 14 days of the assessment period. The Care Plan revised on 5/1//26 identified Resident #12 has an altered cardiovascular status related to hypertension with interventions of giving oxygen as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Electronic Health Records (EHR) review, observations, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to provide the residents with a comfortable / clean homelike environment when bed linens were not applied to beds in a timely manner and rooms were not clean for 3 for 20 residents reviewed (Resident #17, #30 and #55). The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #30 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 indicating no cognitive impairment. An observation on 3/18/26 at 10:20 AM revealed the linen on Resident #30's bed rolled up at the foot of the bed and the bed was not made. On 3/18/26 at 10:20 AM Resident #30 explained she would like her bed to be made in the morning. Resident #30 said it would be nice if it was made by the time breakfast was over but for sure before the lunch meal. An observation on 3/18/26 at 10:42 AM revealed the linen on Resident #30's bed remained rolled up at the foot of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, Medication Administration Records and Treatment Administration records (MAR-TAR) review, resident and resident family interviews, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to provide physician ordered medications and failed to notify the physician of missed medications for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #7, #20 and #35) and the facility failed follow physician ordered interventions to notify the physician for a resident with weight fluctuations for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #10). The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #7 documented diagnoses of insomnia, depression and Multiple Sclerosis. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the facility provided document titled Order Summary Report signed by the physician 6/4/25 revealed the following orders: Fibercon tablet with an order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, electronic health record (EHR) review, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to provide nursing staff to assure residents safety by not responding to call lights in a timely manner for 3 of 16 resident reviewed (Resident #30, #32 and #33). The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #30 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #30 had diagnoses of Dysphagia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, and stiffness of right shoulder. The MDS also indicated Resident #30 required partial/moderate assistance with oral hygiene, substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, partial/moderate assistance with upper body dressing, substantial/maximal assistance with lower body dressing and substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene. On 3/18/26 at 10:21 AM Resident #30 stated last night on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure proper temperatures for foods served to residents. The facility reported a census of 57 residents.1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #30 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 3/18/26 at 10:36 AM Resident #30 stated dinner meals are served cool. Resident #30 stated she does not ask the staff to reheat the food she just does not eat the food. Resident #30 explained the staff would not reheat the food if she asked. 2. The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #33 documented a BIMS of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 3/18/26 at 7:58 AM Resident #33 stated most meals are served cold. Resident #33 stated she eats most meals in her room. Resident #33 stated she would like the meals to be served warmer. Resident #33 stated she would ask the staff to warm the food up but it depends on who the Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) working if they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement proper hand hygiene protocols to prevent the spread of infection during the administration of oral medication, insulin administration, and enteral tube medication administration for 4 of 4 resident observed for medication administration (Residents #2, #16, #19 and #48). Additionally, the facility failed to adhere to current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines by not utilizing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during enteral tube medication administration to prevent the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: 1.Observation on 3/19/26 at 8:16 AM, showed Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) accessed Resident #48's medication record via computer, obtained medication from the medication cart, and prepared the dose in a medication cup. Staff J approached Resident #48, grasped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents had the proper supplies for urinary independence for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #17). The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #17 documented diagnoses of morbid obesity and heart failure. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment Interview on 3/18/2026 at 11:29 a.m., with Resident #17 revealed she uses a female urinal and she uses it on a daily basis. Observation of her urinal was noted to have brown areas on the outside and noted to have a urine scale in the bottom of the urinal. She explained the brown areas on the outside of the urinal is feces that has been there awhile. She explained the facility has not changed the urinal for approximately 3 months and does not clean it weekly. Observation of the urinal top also showed a bend in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, resident family interview, family interview, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to provide access to personal funds managed by the facility or manage personal funds deposited at the facility for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #11 and #30). The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #11 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment.On 3/17/26 at 6:39 PM Resident #11's Nephew, financial and care Power of Attorney (POA) stated he was not sure if Resident #11 could get his money on the weekend or in the evening. 2. The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #30 documented a BIMS of 14 indicating no cognitive impairment.On 3/18/26 at 10:33 AM Resident #30 stated she was unable to get her personal funds in the evening or on the weekends so she had to keep money in her purse to ensure she had money when she wanted it.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 60 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Electronic Health Records (EHR) review, staff interview, family interview and policy review the facility failed to notify the resident's representative / family / Power of Attorney (POA) when a resident had a change in condition that lead to a transfer to the Emergency Department (ED) for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #10) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings included:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #10 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 9 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #10's EHR titled, Census documented Resident #10 was transferred to the hospital 1/7/26 and returned 1/22/26.Review of Resident #10's EHR titled, Progress Note documented an entry at 5:40 AM on 1/7/26 by Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on-call provider gave orders to send Resident #10 to the ED via ambulance for evaluation and supply oxygen, updated resident on orders as resident is own POA.Review of Resident #10's EHR titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to properly complete the Centers of Medicare & Medicaid form #10123 for 1 of 3 sampled residents. (Residents #4). The facility reported a census of 58 residents.Findings Include: The ABN form #10123 dated 12/23/25 for Resident #4 revealed the Social Worker documented a 48 hour notice waived. During an interview on 3/18/26 at 1:14 PM, the Social Worker reported that she had completed form #10123 and documented that Resident #4 waived a 48-hour notice. She further stated she could not recall the rationale for the waiver and indicated she would investigate the matter. During an interview on 3/18/26 at 2:51 PM, the Social Worker reported that she had been unable to locate documentation or rationale regarding the resident's waiver of the 48-hour notice on form #10123. When asked if a 48-hour notice should be documented as waived by the resident because the facility failed to provide the proper 48 hour advance notice, the Social Worker stated no. The undated Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non Coverage Part A failed to address form #10123 or the required 48 hour notice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review and staff interview the facility failed to discontinue antipsychotic medication when ordered to be stopped therefore the medication was continued to be administered for 1 out of 5 residents (Resident #20 ) for unnecessary medication. The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #20 documented diagnoses of anxiety disorder and depression. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of order signed by the physician on 10/16/25 revealed discontinue quetiapine. Review of October Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed quetiapine was administered daily from October 17- 31, 2025. Review of November MAR revealed quetiapine was administered daily from November 1- 30, 2025. Review of December MAR revealed quetiapine was administered daily from December 1-11, 16, 18, 27-30 with a discontinue date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the Iowa Department of Inspections & Appeals and Licensing (DIAL) within 2 hours of an allegation of abuse for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #3 and #50). The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #3 documented diagnoses of coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus and muscle weakness. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of facility provided Incident Report dated 3/8/26 at 3:21 p.m., revealed Staff I, Registered Nurse (RN) was at the nursing station paging at about 3:21 p.m., to get update on another resident when caregiver came up to nurse and stated, just letting you know Resident #2 was in this resident room attempting to get in bed with her. This writer hung up and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete a recapitulation of stay after discharge for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for discharges (Resident #61 and #63). The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #61 documented diagnoses of hypertension, Bell's Palsy and prediabetes. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of the Census tab revealed stop billing on 1/12/26. Review of the January 2026 notice to the Long Term Care Ombudsman revealed the resident was discharged to home on 1/12/26. Review of the medical record lacked a recapitulation of stay. 2. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #63 documented diagnoses of hypertension, muscle weakness and cardiac murmur. The MDS showed the BIMS score of 14 indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of the Census tab revealed stop billing 1/15/26. Review of the Progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Medication Administration Records - Treatment Administration Records (MAR-TAR) Electronic Health Records (EHR) review, document review, policy review and staff interviews the facility failed to incorporate the required recommendations from the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level II determination and failed to refer a resident with a later identified with newly evident or possible serious MD or ID related condition to the appropriate state-designated authority for a level II evaluation for 3 out of 4 residents (Resident #4, #5, and #15) reviewed for PASRR requirements. The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 9 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. MDS also documented diagnoses of major depressive disorder and schizophrenia. Review of Resident #4's document dated 11/19/25 titled, Notice of PASRR Level II outcome documented ongoing psychiatric…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, document review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan to include updated recommendations when a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II Outcome was completed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 9 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. MDS also documented diagnoses of major depressive disorder and schizophrenia.Review on of Resident #4's EHR titled Care Plan on 3/18/26 documented you will receive this service for one year through 3/13/2027. Continued need will be assessed by the case manager once a year through 12/21/2030. Behavioral Health would provide case management services and the social worker at the NF will be responsible for arranging for these services prior to discharge on [DATE]. You will have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to provide bathing assistance twice weekly for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for bathing (Resident #20 and #50). The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #20 documented diagnoses of anxiety disorder and depression. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of facility provided documentation titled Follow Up Question Report dated 1/19/26-3/19/26 revealed the following information:2/7/26- bathing was documented as refused. Resident received a bath on 2/4/26 and again on 2/11/26. Resident went 6 days without a bath. 3/11/26- bathing was documented as not applicable. Resident received a bath on 3/7/26 and again on 3/14/26. Resident went 6 days without a bath. Review of Care Plan with a revision date of 2/7/25 revealed resident is totally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, Medication Administration Record - Treatment Administration Record (MAR-TAR) review, policy review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide appropriate interventions for the urinary catheter to provide appropriate services to prevent urinary tract infections to 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #10). The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #10 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 9 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #10 had a diagnosis of neuropathic bladder.Review of document dated 2/25/26 titled, Hospital Discharge Summary documented Resident #10 had a chronic indwelling foley catheter placed on 2/11/26-present and a urinary tract infection associated with indwelling urethral catheter noted on 2/20/26-present. Hospital Discharge Summary documented Resident #10 had the catheter last changed on 2/21/26 prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Electronic Health Records (EHR), staff interview, observation and policy review the facility failed to implement policies and procedures regarding the technical aspect of feeding tubes by pushing enteral formula with a piston syringe into feeding tube for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings include:Observation on 3/19/26 at 9:04 AM of Resident #2's enteral medication administration by Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) revealed Staff C checked residual, completed an auscultation of air bolus for placement, flushed 30cc H20, pushed water through syringe with palm of hand, drew up medication separately, pushed forcefully with palm of hand, Staff C explained she had to use force because the syringe itself is difficult to push, flushed with 10cc h20 between medications, obtained new syringe, obtained fresh water about 4 oz, left room, obtained 81mg low dose from other cart, returned to medication cart, crushed medication, completed hand hygiene, applied gloves, flushed with 30cc, administered medication and flushed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to address dementia care for 2 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #7 and #28). The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #7 documented diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Multiple Sclerosis and cognitive communication deficit. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed active diagnosis of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia. Review of Resident #7's active diagnosis list revealed dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance with a date of 10/18/23. Review of Resident #7's Care Plan with a revision date of 1/15/26 lacked information regarding dementia care. Review of facility provided policy titled Dementia Care with a revised date of 7/2025 revealed the facility is to develop and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, manufacturer's guidelines and staff interview, the facility failed to assure residents insulin pen was primed by performing a safety check prior to insulin administration preventing a significant medication error for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #16). The facility reported a census of 58 residents.Findings include:Observation on 3/19/26 at 8:25 AM, showed that Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) accessed Resident #16's medication record via computer, retrieved Resident #16's insulin pen, attached the pen needle, and dialed the dosage to the prescribed 10 units of insulin. Staff J failed to perform a safety test dose of 2 units of insulin as required by the manufacturer's instruction. Staff J donned gloves, lifted Resident #16's shirt, applied an alcohol wipe to the skin, and administered the insulin to the right flank area. Review of the Injections, Insulin policy last reviewed July 2022 failed to provide information or instruction regarding use of an insulin pen. Review of the manufacturer's guidelines dated 2022 showed to perform a safety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide and maintain accurate resident records to accurately record residents weights in the facility for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #35). The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #35 documented diagnoses of heart failure, atrial fibrillations and hypertension. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of residents weights revealed the following information:On 1/9/26- 200 pounds (lbs) hospital weight.On 1/18/26- 177.2 lbs - wheelchair.On 1/24/26- 176.0 lbs - mechanical lift.On 1/31/26- 259.5 lbs - wheelchair.On 2/1/26- 257.3 lbs - wheelchair.On 3/1/26- 168.4 lbs - standing. Review of the clinical records lacked documentation of the weight fluctuations. Interview on 3/24/2026 at 2:19 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed when looking at the weights she stated the staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on previous CMS-2567 review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, effective Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: Review of the Department of Inspections, Appeals and Licensing (DIAL) website under the facility's visit history revealed repeated deficient practices identified during the facility's annual survey and the previous annual survey conducted 3/11/25. The repeat deficiencies cited included: F582- Medicaid/Medicare Coverage/Liability notice cited on 3/11/25 and cited during the current survey. F584- Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike Environment cited on 3/11/25 and cited during the current survey. F677- ADL Care provided for Dependent Residents cited on 3/11/25 and cited during the current survey. F684- Quality of Care cited on 3/11/25 and cited during the current survey. F880- Infection Prevention & Control cited on 3/11/25 and cited during the current survey. Review of the facility provided policy titled QAPI with a revised date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy the facility failed to have a Infection Preventionist present for their quarterly Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings. The facility reported a census of 57.Findings include: Review of facility documentation titled QAPI attendance dated 12/18/2025 lacked a trained infection preventionist (IP) present at the meeting. Review of facility provided policy titled Quality Assessment Performance Improvement (QAPI) with a revised date of 10/2022 revealed the committee will maintain a record of the dates of all meetings and the names/titles of those attending each meeting. Interview on 3/26/2026 at 9:45 a.m., with the Administrator revealed there was no IP with training present from October 2025 until the current IP got her training at the QAPI meetings.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to update care plan interventions for resident after falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, (Resident #2).Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #2 documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, dementia and malnutrition. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment.The Incident Reports for Resident #6 showed the following falls:3/31/25 at 9:00 PM- resident found on floor,4/2/25 at 10:30 PM- resident found sitting on the floor, 4/7/25 at 8:55 PM- resident found sliding on her buttock across the floor,4/19/25 at 10:30 AM- resident stood up from recliner and fell,6/12/25 at 4:30 AM- resident found sitting on the floor,6/15/25 at 2:45 PM- resident found sitting on the floor.The Care Plan for Resident #1 showed the facility failed to place interventions on the care plan related to the falls. In an interview on 10/7/25 at 11:07 AM, Staff A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-11 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure bed hold notice was signed by residents and or the resident's responsible person when residents transferred out of the facility and failed to provide written notice of bed hold for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #4, #11, #40 and #45). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #4 documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, depression and seizure disorder. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #4's census tab revealed the following information: 3/9/24- hospital no charge, 3/21/24- active. Review of Progress Notes revealed the following: On 3/9/24 at 7:46 p.m., resident being assessed at local hospital. On 3/10/24 at 3:17 a.m., resident being transferred via helicopter to a larger hospital. On 3/21/24 at 11:44 p.m., resident readmitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview, observation, and policy review the facility failed to provide an opportunity for bath or shower to 4 of 6 residents reviewed (Residents #2, #37, #46, and #202). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #46's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed an admission date of 11/5/24 from a short-term general hospital stay. The MDS revealed Resident #46 required substantial assistance with bathing. Interview on 2/26/25 at 11:48 AM with Resident #46 revealed that he is only getting a shower maybe once a week, and would like to have showers more frequently. Interview on 2/26/25 at 11:51 AM Staff E Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) revealed residents are supposed to get bathed twice a week. Staff E then revealed that staff will document in the Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR). Staff E…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-11 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on document review and staff interview the facility failed to employ a clinically qualified nutrition professional by not having a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings include: Interview on 2/24/25 at 11:03 AM with the Administrator revealed that the facility does not have a CDM, and that the facility does have an interim manager working on his CDM. Interview on 2/27/25 at 9:50 AM with the Administrator revealed that the facility does have a person with a CDM certification that is training starting this week, and acknowledged that the facility did not have a CDM prior to this. The Administrator then revealed her expectation would be for a Certified Dietary Manager to be in charge of the kitchen. Interview on 3/6/25 at 12:30 PM with Staff C Facility consultant revealed her expectation would be to have a certified dietary manager in charge of the kitchen. Staff C further revealed that the facility does not have a policy for certified dietary managers.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain physical signatures or record attempts to obtain physical signatures on notification of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) Centers of Medicare & Medicaid (CMS)-10123 and CMS form CMS-10055 for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Residents #204). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings Include: Record review for Resident #204 revealed form CMS 10123-NOMNC with a services end date of 9/4/24. Resident #204's representative gave verbal consent for signature on 9/4/24 however lacked a signature of resident or resident representative. Review of Resident #204's Progress Notes lacked any documentation on any attempts to obtain physical signatures on CMS 10123-NOMNC and CMS-10055. Review of the Centers (CMS) Medicare Claims Processing Manual Chapter 30 with a revision date of 1/21/22 revealed the following information under ABN options for Delivery other than in-person revealed ABNs should be delivered in-person and prior to the delivery of medical care which is presumed to be non-covered. In…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, family interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident's personal property was protected from loss or theft, (Resident #48). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #48's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Interview on 2/25/25 at 1:17 PM with Resident # 48 revealed that she had a quilt that went missing from the laundry. Resident #48 revealed she had let the facility know, but it had not been replaced. Review of an untitled and undated document for inventory with Resident #48's name revealed nothing marked for personal inventory. Interview on 3/6/25 at 10:32 AM Staff D Social Services revealed that he was not the Social Worker at the time when Resident #48 was admitted to the facility. Staff D then revealed that he did not complete the form but the previous social service personnel should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to revise and update care plans to include and address high risk medications and side effects to watch for 1 out of 22 sampled residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans (Resident #13). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #13 documented diagnoses of coronary artery disease, fibromyalgia and respiratory failure. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Order Summary Report dated 3/6/25 revealed an order for oxycodone-actaminophen (opioid medication) tablet with an order date of 1/30/25. Review of the undated current Care Plan lacked usage of opioid medication and side effects to watch for with opioid medication usage. Review of the facility provided policy titled Comprehensive Person Centered Care Planning with a revision date of 03/2022 revealed this facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to provide physician ordered daily weights 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #11) and failed to provide pressure ulcer dressing changes as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #44). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #11 documented heart failure, hypertension and coronary artery disease. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of signed Physician Order dated 9/5/24 revealed an order for daily weights, call clinic for a weight gain of 2-3 pounds overnight or 5 pounds in 1 week. Review of signed Order Summary Report dated 2/5/25 revealed an order for daily weights with an order date of 10/18/24 with a start date of 10/19/24. Review of the Progress Notes revealed the following: 11/4/24 at 2:10 p.m., daily weight,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical document review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #22, and #48). The facility reported a census of 50. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #22's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 had problems with short and long term memory problems. The MDS further revealed diagnosis of non-traumatic brain dysfunction, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the Electronic Healthcare Records (EHR) page titled, Progress Notes revealed an entry dated 10/18/24 at 4:01 PM. This entry revealed Resident #22 was noted outside of the facility in the parking lot by a staff member and brought back inside. Further review of the Progress Notes revealed Resident #22 had eloped from the facility on 9/26/24 per an entry made on 9/27/24 at 4:35 PM. This entry revealed Resident #22 had exited through a hallway into the assisted living portion of the building. Review of a document titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to identify side effects, non-pharmalogical interventions to try prior to medication, specific targeted behaviors related to high risk medications in 2 out of 5 sampled residents reviewed (Resident #4 and #13). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #4 documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), respiratory failure and dependence on supplemental oxygen. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #4's signed Order Summary report dated 2/7/25 revealed the following order: a. Zyprexa (antipsychotic medication) oral tablet with a start date of 1/29/25. Review of Resident #4's Care Plan with a revision date of 10/30/24 revealed a focus of resident uses anti-anxiety medications with a created date of 9/5/21. It lacked specific targeted behaviors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and infection control policy the facility failed to use universal infection control measures and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during incontinence cares for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for infection control (Resident #45). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #45's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 utilized an indwelling catheter. The MDS further revealed diagnosis of neurogenic bladder, and hemiplegia following a cerebral infarction. Review of a document titled Order Summary Report dated 2/3/25 revealed an order to change Resident #45's indwelling catheter monthly and as necessary. Observation on 2/27/25 at 11:17 AM Staff A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), and Staff B CNA completed hand hygiene and donned gloves. Staff A and Staff B then proceed to reposition Resident #45 and complete peri cares. No gown was donned by either staff while repositioning or completing peri cares for Resident #45.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the planned menu, observation and staff interviews facility staff failed to follow the planned menu for residents. The facility identified a census of 46 residents. Findings include: The facility's Week 1 menu identified the following items as part of the planned menu for the lunch meal on 7/25/24: Fried Chicken Potato Salad Green Beans with bacon Strawberry Sponge Shortcake Milk Observation on 7/25/24 starting at 12:23 p.m. the lunch meal being served consisted of: Chicken wrap Potato salad Potato chips Lemon Pudding Interview on 7/26/24 at 8:44 a.m., with Staff C, Dietary Manager revealed on 7/25/24 she did not have enough fried chicken for the noon meal as she did not order enough and she called the dietician for substitutions so she made a decision to make chicken wraps. Staff C revealed she has only been in her position for approximately a week and half but has worked in the kitchen since April and has not had any training as a dietary manager. Staff C further revealed she was not able to serve the strawberry sponge shortcake as they only got 1 spongecake on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility record review and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure proper temperatures for foods served to residents. The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Finding Include: Ongoing observation on 7/26/24 starting at 12:03 p.m., revealed the following: a. Observation of 3 dietary trays sitting on the table with covers on upon entering the kitchen. b. Observation during meal service Staff C, Dietary Manager called call room trays were ready. Verified with Staff C the room tray was ready to leave the kitchen and go to the resident. Asked Staff C to take meal temperatures. Temperatures are as follows: Fish Sticks- 94.3 degrees Fahrenheit (F), Carrots 93.5 degrees F and cheesy rice 102 degrees F. Staff C left the cover off of the meal tray. Approximately 10 minutes later Staff C revealed the room tray needed to be remade. c. Puree food on a tray with covers went to service window. Asked Staff C what the food was. Staff C revealed it was pureed cheesy rice and she had just taken it out of the microwave. Asked Staff C to check the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-28 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy reviews the facility failed to provide at least three meals daily, at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community or in accordance with resident needs, preferences, requests, and plan of care. The facility identified a census of 46 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 7/25/24 at 12:23 p.m., the first meal was served in the dining room and the last meal was served at 1:25 p.m. 2. Interview on 7/26/24 at 11:36 a.m., with Resident #9 revealed meals are always late. They usually are about 30 minutes late. 3. Interview on 7/26/24 at 12:35 p.m., with Resident #16 revealed on 7/25/24 supper was approximately 30 minutes late. 4. Interview on 7/26/24 at 2:26 p.m., with Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) revealed meals lately have been about 15 minutes late. 5. Interview on 7/26/24 at 2:54 p.m., with Staff F, CNA revealed meals are usually 15 minutes late depending on the day. 6. Interview on 7/26/24 at 3:03 p.m., with Staff G, CNA revealed meals are usually late around 20 minutes but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews and policy reviews, the facility failed to provide proper hand hygiene with perineal care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #12). The facility also failed use proper hand hygiene during dining service for 2 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #17 & #18) and when preparing food in the kitchen. The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #12 documented diagnoses of non-traumatic brain dysfunction, dementia and dysphagia. The MDS documented Resident #12 totally dependent for toileting hygiene, showering and personal hygiene. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 01 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. On 7/27/24 at 1:20 PM observed Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and Staff J, CNA removed Resident #12's pants, unfastened the brief, pulled down the brief then rolled the resident onto her left side. Staff J then held the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to provide for resident's dignity during dining. The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Findings include: During an ongoing observation on 7/25/24 starting at 12:23 p.m., revealed Staff H, Certified Nursing Assistant was feeding Resident #17 and Resident #18. Resident #17 was noted to be sitting herself forward in her wheelchair Staff H took her left arm and placed it across Resident #17's chest and continued to assist Resident #18 with eating. Staff H did not say anything to Resident #17 until after she had assisted Resident #18 with 3 more bites of food. Staff H got up from the table at 12:25 p.m., and asked another staff member to watch Resident #17. Staff H returned to the table at 12:34 p.m Staff H sat down and without talking to Resident #17 and Resident #18 assisted with eating their meal. Review of facility provided policy titled Resident Rights reviewed 6/2023 revealed the resident has the right to be treated with consideration, respect, and full recognition of his or her dignity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs by not placing the call light within reach of residents for 2 out of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #1 and #6). The facility reported a census of 46 residents. 1. The Grievance Resolution form dated 5/28/24 at 1:00 PM identified Resident #1 stated the call light was left out of reach after cares. The resident called the front desk to ask for assistance. The grievance conclusion identified staff confirmed the call light was out of reach upon entering the resident's room. Corrective action identified as education to staff on call lights. The Grievance Resolution form dated 6/10/24 identified Resident #1 reported during a mechanical lift transfer the nurse left the resident unattended and without a call light. The form identified the resident felt fearful as if she may fall out of the chair before they got back. 2. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to use the mechanical lift in an appropriate manner to avoid hazards and prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 46 residents. The findings include: The Grievance Resolution Form dated 6/10/24 showed the facility received a report from Resident #1 that identified staff banged her foot on the mechanical lift during a transfer. A staff member instructed the other to be more careful with transfers. The resident reported the incorrect placement of her body in the wheelchair caused her to feel that she may slip out. The nurse then left the resident unattended, and without the call light, while she went to get help. Resident #1 reported feeling fearful as if she may fall out of her chair before staff returned to the room. Resident #1 also reported when staff later returned her to bed they used the emergency button to lower her into bed which released quickly and scared her. The nurse stated to the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), we only use this in an emergency. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy, the facility failed to provide complete and appropriate incontinence care in a manner to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 3 residents observed (Resident #12). The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Finding include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #12 documented diagnoses of non-traumatic brain dysfunction, dementia and dysphagia. The MDS documented Resident #12 totally dependent for toileting hygiene, showering and personal hygiene. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 01 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. On 7/27/24 at 1:20 PM observed Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and Staff J, CNA removed Resident #12's pants, unfastened the brief, pulled down the brief then rolled the resident onto her left side. Staff J then held the resident's right leg while Staff A stood behind the resident, reached between the resident's legs to the front perineal area then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to consistently answer call lights within a reasonable amount of time. Residents reported call light response time over 15 minutes for 3 out 6 residents reviewed (Residents #1, #8, and #15). The facility reported a census of 46 residents. 1. The Grievance Resolution form dated 5/28/24 at 1:00 PM identified Resident #1 turned on the call light at 6:30 AM. The call light wasn't answered until 7:30 AM. The resident reported incontinence due to the delay. The investigation listed on the grievance included staff educated on answering call lights in a timely manner. The Grievance identified corrective action included education to staff regarding call light response time. 2. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #8 dependent or required substantial assistance for personal hygiene.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-28 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to provide alternatives or substitutions during meals to residents. The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Finding Include: 1. Review of the grievances provided by the facility revealed the following: a. Summary of the grievance- 4/1/24 There have been numerous residents with weight loss concerns since the change of dietary rules for residents' choice with meals. Options have been taken away from them. It's been told to the residents if its not on the menu, they can't have it This includes toast, yogurt, applesauce, pudding, eggs, ect. Steps taken to investigate- Executive Director educated staff there is a daily menu with alternative menu option as well. Summary of findings- Residents will choose between a daily menu or an alternative menu. Many choices-yogurt is also available per request. Corrective action- Education to staff about residents rights. b. Summary of the grievance- 6/14/24 Resident #1 revealed she had asked for an egg sandwich for breakfast and was told it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record, facility policy, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and staff interviews, the facility failed to don and doff Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) correctly, dispose of PPE correctly, disinfect reusable PPE correctly, disinfect used laundry containers correctly, and perform hand hygiene in between assistance residents eat their meals. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: 1. In a concurrent observation and interview on 1/22/24 at 11:22 AM of an uncovered red trash bin with a N95 mask in it along with other discarded PPE. A reusable PPE gown hung on Resident #17's outside room door. Staff R, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) reported that someone must have left it there. Staff R then bagged it in a clear trash bag and threw it away in a regular trash bin kept in the hallway. Observation on 1/24/24 at 2:00 PM of Staff I, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) did not tie the waist of her gown before entering a resident's isolation room. When Staff I exited the room, took off her face shield and placed it on top…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility policy, and staff interview the facility failed to provide for resident's dignity during dining when staff engaged in conversation that was not resident focused. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: Continual observation on 1/24/24 from 1:05 PM to 2:30 PM of the table in the dining room in which residents sat at who needed assistance with eating revealed: 1. Staff D, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) and Staff I, CNA talking about personal issues while assisting Resident #4 with eating. 2. Staff D and Staff J, CNA talking to one another and not with Resident #22. The Policy/Procedure dated July 2023 directed that staff shall display respect for residents when speaking with, caring for, or talking about them, as constant affirmation of their individuality and dignity as human beings. In an interview on 1/31/24 at 10:09 AM, when asked about resident's dignity when staff talk between themselves instead of keeping table conversation resident focused, Staff L, Market Leader, initially responded that she would like to know…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-31 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to place grievance forms in a location accessible to residents. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: Observation of the facility on 1/25/24 at 12:15 PM did not reveal grievance forms in the facility. Closed boxes were fixed outside of office doors to submit anonymous grievances. In a concurrent facility tour and interview on 1/25/24 at 12:55 PM, Staff H, Social Services Supervisor found grievance forms located in the foyer to the facility, a location that was locked off for resident access. The Policy/Procedure dated November 2007 revealed in pertinent part that grievance forms are available from Social Services, Administration, Activities Department and Nursing Stations. In an interview on 1/25/24 at12:30 PM, Staff L, Market Leader reported that she was unsure exactly what this facility's process is for grievances; that the corporation's grievance process is for a resident or a resident representative to report a concern to facility staff, ask for a grievance form, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-31 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel file reviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure all employees had an Iowa Criminal Background check and dependent adult/child abuse registry check completed prior to working in the facility for 1 out of 5 employees reviewed (Staff A). The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: Review of facility provided document titled Hires from 11/01/2022-1/22/2024 revealed Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) documented a hire date of 11/18/22. The personnel file for Staff A revealed documention of an criminal background check and dependent adult and child abuse registry check was compelted on 12/22/22 at 10:54 a.m The file lacked documentation of the Iowa Criminal Background Check and dependent adult/child abuse registry check prior to hire. Review of facility provided policy titled Abuse Prevention and Reporting with a revision date of 5/2007 revealed pre-employment screening is done on employees, including obtaining information from previous or current employers, and criminal background checks to assure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility records, facility policy, and family, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to answer call lights within 15 minutes. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: In an interview on 1/22/24 at 10:30 AM, Resident #11 reported that when she calls for aide and the aide needs a second aide it takes forever to get the second person. In an interview on1/23/24 at 9:14 AM Resident #28 reported there has been a lot of temporary staff working here and they don't know what they are doing and have a hard time with that. It depends on who is working and how many staff are working, but when 2 people are needed to assist him, it takes a while during those times. In an interview1/23/24 at 1:33 PM, Resident #193 reported that to have assistance in going back to room after lunch takes up to 3 hours, quite often, the wait time was 2 hours. Resident #193 reported it can take so long to get her call light answered, she has wondered if it was broken. Resident #193 reported that she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-31 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and staff interview the facility failed to verify professional nursing licensure prior to hire for 1 of 3 staff members reviewed (Staff A). The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: Review of facility provided document titled Hires from 11/01/2022-1/22/2024 revealed Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) documented a hire date of 11/18/22. The personnel file for Staff A revealed documentation of the nursing license verification report dated 11/22/22 at 9:20 a.m The file lacked documentation of verification of Staff A ' s professional nursing licensure prior to hire. Review of facility provided policy titled Abuse Prevention and Reporting with a revision date of 5/2007 revealed pre-employment screening is done on employees, including obtaining information from previous or current employers, and criminal background checks to assure that the facility does not employ individuals who have been convicted of a disqualifying event and to assure the employee has a current licensure or certification of is in the process of obtaining hte…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-31 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the kitchen had the appropriate staff to carry out the tasks of the kitchen in a safe and effective manner. The facility identified a census of 42 residents. Findings include: Observation on 1/22/24 at 10:07 a.m., residents seated at the assisted table were being served and assisted with their breakfast meal. Interview on 1/22/24 at 10:07 a.m., with Resident # 2 revealed she does not like most of the food so will order an alternative but it takes forever to get the food. Interview on 1/22/24 at 10:11 a.m., with Staff I, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) revealed breakfast time depends everyday as the facility has a new Dietary Manager (DM) and she is trying to learn and catch up with the serving. Residents usually eat their breakfast but then do not usually eat much for lunch as they have just finished their breakfast. Observation on 1/22/24 at 1:28 p.m., of residents in the dining room still eating meals and resident room trays being served. Observation on 1/23/24 at 10:04…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the planned menu, observation and staff interviews facility staff failed to follow the planned menu for residents. The facility identified a census of 42 residents. Findings include: The facility's Week 2 menu identified the following items as part of the planned menu for the evening meal on 1/24/24: corn chip chicken shredded lettuce and tomato refried beans mandarin oranges Milk Observation on 1/24/24 at 5:22 p.m. the evening meal being served consisted of: scalloped potatoes and ham lettuce salad with dressing mandarin oranges Observation made during meal service revealed Resident #4 and #5 receive a pureed diet. On 1/24/24 for evening meal the menu consisted of: Pureed corn chip chicken Purred shredded lettuce and tomato Pureed refried beans Pureed mandarin oranges Milk. Observation of Resident #4 and #5 meals being prepared in the kitchen. The DM revealed she did not like how the meals pureed so she was going to get the resident something else to eat. Resident #4 and #5 received the following items for 1/24/24 evening meal: Puree green beans Mashed potatoes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility record review and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure proper temperatures for foods served to residents. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Finding Include: Interview on 1/22/24 at 10:29 a.m., with Resident # 11 revealed the eggs were cold when she received them this morning. Resident #11 revealed staff did warm them up but it happens all the time. Interview on 1/22/24 at 10:07 a.m., with Resident # 2 revealed the food is always cold when she gets it. Resident #2 further revealed she does not like most of the food so will order an alternative but it takes forever to get the food. Lunch tray requested on 1/22/24 at 12:54 p.m., Dietary Manager (DM) revealed everyone had been served. DM served on a plate chicken breast, peas in a cup, breadstick, and brownie and covered. Temperature of food was checked as follows: Chicken breast- 104.6 degrees Cup of peas- 120.4 degrees Breadstick- luke warm and hard Brownie- sticky in appearance and stuck to the spoon used to cut it in half Observation on 1/22/24 at 1:28 p.m., of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy reviews the facility failed to provide at least three meals daily, at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community or in accordance with resident needs, preferences, requests, and plan of care. The facility identified a census of 42 residents. Findings include: Observation on 1/22/24 at 10:07 a.m., residents seated at the assisted table were being served and assisted with their breakfast meal. Interview on 1/22/24 at 10:07 a.m., with Resident # 2 revealed she does not like most of the food so will order an alternative but it takes forever to get the food. Interview on 1/22/24 at 10:11 a.m., with Staff I, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) revealed breakfast time depends everyday as the facility has a DM and she is trying to learn and catch up with the serving. Residents usually eat their breakfast but then do not usually eat much for lunch as they have just finished their breakfast. Observation on 1/22/24 at 1:28 p.m., of residents in the dining room still eating meals and resident room trays…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions. The facility identified a census of 42 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 1/24/24 at 11:24 a.m., revealed the following: A sugar container with lid on dated 1/16 revealed a styrofoam cup laying in the sugar ready for use. Window on the north side of the kitchen was open with air blowing on pan with uncovered bread and margarine being prepared for lunch. Bread and margarine was served to residents for lunch on 1/24/24. 2. Observation on 1/25/24 at 8:49 a.m., revealed sugar container with lid on dated 1/16 revealed a styrofoam cup laying in the sugar ready for use. Review of the facility provided policy titled Food Storage Guidelines updated January 2019 revealed: Store food in a clean, dry location not exposed to splashes, dust or other contamination. Interview on 1/25/24 at 8:51 a.m., with Staff G, Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) revealed the cup should not be in the sugar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to make good faith attempts to correct quality deficiencies and have governance or leadership oversight with their Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement program (QAPI). The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: An untitled, undated list of Licensed Nursing Home Administrators (LNHA) since the last recertification survey that occurred 11/10/22 revealed there were 2 previous LNHA prior to the current LNHA. In an interview on 1/31/24 at 8:22 AM, Staff E, Maintenance Supervisor, reported that he has issues related to coordinating work with the housekeeping department and has not brought this to the attention of the facility staff that he reports to. When asked if he had brought his issue with the housekeeping department for a potential QAPI issue to work on, he reported that he had not and was not familiar with his ability to bring issues to QAPI meetings for review. In an interview on 1/31/24 1:05 PM, when asked if there had been QAPI efforts related to the facility's pattern of repeated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on facility documents, facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to have the required Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) members present for meetings. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: Review of the QAPI sign in sheets revealed the Medical Director was not present for meetings held in July 2023 or October 2023. In an interview on1/23/24 at 4:25 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported that the Medical Director was not present for the QAPI meetings that took place in July 2023 or October 2023. They had an ad hoc QAPI meeting in November of 2023, but she was unable to locate the sign in sheet for that meeting. The QAPI - Role of the Medical Staff (Medical Director and Attending Physicians) Policy revised April 2014 lacked direction that the Medical Director attended QAPI meetings at a minimum of quarterly.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide a clean homelike environment for all the residents living in the facility by not changing soiled linens or cleaning ceiling vent for 2 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #2 and #193). The facility reported a census of 42. Findings include: 1. Observation on 1/22/24 at 9:30 a.m. of Resident #2 ' s bed linens revealed brown and red soiled areas covered up with a blanket. Resident #2 revealed their sheets have been soiled like this for approximately a week. Resident #2 revealed they have asked the staff to change the soiled sheets and they have not been changed. On 1/23/24 at 12:17 PM observation of linens on bed and they are soiled with a red and brown matter. 2. Observation on 1/24/24 at 11:16 a.m. of Resident #2 ' s bed linens revealed brown and red soiled areas covered up with a blanket with a personal blanket covering the area. 3. Observation on 1/29/24 at 11:13 a.m., revealed Resident #2 laying in their bed. When Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to notify the Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman for 3 of 4 residents reviewed who transferred to the hospital (Resident #1, #13 and #20). The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: 1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension and asthma. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicated no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1 ' s Census tab revealed the following: On 5/6/23- Hospital No Charge. On 5/9/23- Active. Review of Resident #1 ' s Progress Notes revealed the following information: On 5/6/23 at 1:46 p.m., Resident #1 admitted to the local hospital. On 5/9/23 at 2:23 p.m., Resident #1 readmitted to the facility at this time. The facility lacked documentation of May 2023 notification to the LTC Ombudsman of discharges. 2. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #13…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure bed hold notice was signed by resident and or the resident's responsible person when residents transferred out of the facility for 3 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #1, #13 and #34). The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: 1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension and asthma. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicates no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1 ' s Census tab revealed the following: On 5/6/23- Hospital No Charge. On 5/9/23- Active. On 12/4/23- STOP BILLING. On 12/8/23- Active. Review of Resident #1 ' s Progress Notes revealed the following information: On 5/6/23 at 1:46 p.m., Resident #1 admitted to the local hospital. On 5/9/23 at 2:23 p.m., Resident #1 readmitted to the facility at this time. On 12/4/23 at 11:26 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record, facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 14 residents reviewed (Resident #20). The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #20 revealed the Resident had short and long term memory problems. The Resident had diagnoses of dementia, malnutrition, and edema. The Resident had 1 unhealed pressure ulcer that was unstageable and the Resident did not have a pressure reducing device for her bed. The Order Summary Report signed by a physician on 1/4/24 revealed an order to check inflation of air overlay (on bed) every shift with a start date of 6/12/23. In an interview on 1/25/24 at 10:15 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported that an Advance Practice Registered Nurse (ARNP) verbally advised her that the wound was a pressure ulcer. Addendum Wound Care Progress Note signed by an ARNP dated 1/25/24 revealed the Resident had an ulcer to the right second toe that was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record, facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to submit a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for a change in condition for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #10). The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #10 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, depressive type, dementia, anxiety, depression, and psychotic disorder. The Level 1 Form for PASRR Review dated 6/12/20 revealed: 1. Diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, sleep disorder, and adjustment disorder. 2. Medications: a. Clonazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg) daily for major depressive disorder. b. Pristiq 50 mg daily for schizoaffective disorder. c. Nortriptyline 25 mg daily for sleep disorder. 3. The resident did not have a diagnosis of dementia. 4. Should there be an exacerbation related to mental illness or a discrepancy in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to revise and update care plans to include and address high risk medications and side effects to watch for in 1 out of 13 sampled residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans (Resident #11). The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #9 documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure and hypertension. The MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed the resident was taking diuretic medication in the review period. Review of the January 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed an order for furosemide (diuretic medication) with an order date of 7/13/23. Review of the Order Summary Report signed by the physician dated 1/8/24 revealed an order for furosemide daily with an order date of 7/13/23 and start date of 7/14/23. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record, facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 15 residents reviewed (Resident #32). The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: TheMinimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #32 documented diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer ' s Dementia, anxiety disorder, and pain. Resident was currently under hospice care. The MDS showed the BIMS score was not assessed. Resident cognitive skills for daily decision making revealed moderately impaired. Review of the Hospice Plan of Care dated 1/11/24 at 1:10 p.m., revealed current medication orders signed by the physician dated 1/10/24: Acetaminophen oral solution every 4 hours as needed with a start date of 11/1/22 Acetaminophen tablet every 12 hours with a start date of 11/1/22 Acetaminophen rectal suppository every 6 hours as needed with a start date of 11/1/22 Bisacodyl rectal suppository as needed for constipation with a start date of 11/1/22 Haloperidol oral concentrate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record, facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement non pharmacological care plan interventions prior to obtaining an order for a psychotropic medication for 1 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #41). The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #41 revealed he had severely impaired decision making skills for daily life and needed partial to moderate assistance with toileting and transferring from chair to bed. Resident #41 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, and depression. The Nursing Note on 12/5/2023 at 9:30 PM written by Staff K, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) revealed the Resident appeared to be agitated, yelling, he was being physical towards staff, and he was trying to leave the building multiple times. Residents Doctor was notified for one time order for Lorazepam. Dr ordered 2mg Lorazepam PO. Resident was given Lorazepam at 2130 (9:30 PM), resident was given a cup of coffee, while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record, facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain a correct verbal order for a psychotropic medication with a dose administered that was not what was ordered for 1 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #41). The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #41 revealed he had severely impaired decision making skills for daily life and he needed partial to moderate assistance with toileting and transferring from chair to bed. Resident #41 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, and depression. The Nursing Note on 12/5/2023 at 9:30 PM written by Staff K, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) revealed the Resident appeared to be agitated, yelling, he was being physical towards staff, and he was trying to leave the building multiple times. Residents Doctor was notified for one time order for Lorazepam. Dr ordered 2mg Lorazepam PO. Resident was given Lorazepam at 2130 (9:30 PM), resident was given a cup of coffee,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record, facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer influenza vaccination to 2 of 5 residents reviewed (Residents #9 and #39). The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #9 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. The resident did not receive an influenza vaccination because the facility did not offer one. 2. The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #39 revealed a BIMS score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. The resident did not receive an influenza vaccination because the facility did not offer one. The clinical record included the Vaccine Consent Form signed by the resident on 10/3/23 to receive the influenza vaccine. The Order signed by a physician on 10/9/23 directed that the resident receive an influenza vaccination. The Immunizations- Residents Policy dated July 2023 directed in pertinent part that this facility to administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, family and staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were unable to ingest cream for external use only for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident # 8). The facility reported a total census of 41 residents. Findings include: The The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident # 8 documented diagnoses non-Alzheimer ' s dementia, depression and arthritis. The MDS included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the Progress Notes revealed the following: a. On 6/13/23 at 2:30 a.m., nurse was called to the resident's room by CNA ' s, the previous nurse left a small medicine cup of calmospetine ointment on the bedside table. The resident had taken the cup and with her fingers licked it out. Resident was alert and oriented and no coughing or shortness of breath noted. Nurse contacted Iowa Poison Control and received instructions if the resident was awake to give them…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$130,305 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $104,855 — penalty dated 2026-03-26
- $8,649 — penalty dated 2024-07-28
- $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-01-31
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-22 for 22 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.2 | -2.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/09/2024 |
| KAMSTRA, LEE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/10/2025 |
| WILKINS, MELODEE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/10/2025 |
| JORGENSEN, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2024 |
| PORT, BARRY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 07/20/2018 |
| KEETCH, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2011 |
| KOENIG, DEBRA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2020 |
| SATO, AMI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/09/2024 |
| AEROFUND HOLDINGS INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/18/2011 |
| BLU MEDSTAFF LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/18/2011 |
| HEART MEDICAL SOLUTIONS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/18/2011 |
| HELPING HANDS NURSING SOLUTION INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/18/2011 |
| ONSHIFT INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/18/2011 |
| CARETRUST GP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/18/2011 |
| CARETRUST REIT INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/18/2011 |
| CTR PARTNERSHIP LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/18/2011 |
| ENSIGN SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2011 |
| THE ENSIGN GROUP INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/29/2002 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $470K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165245. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.