No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation Center

711 West 11th Street, Spencer, IA 51301 · For profit - Corporation · 82 certified beds · (712) 262-2344 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0605) — most recent Aug 2025Resident-funds citation (F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$24,706 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $24,706 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-20)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
20 W 6th St · (712) 580-2022 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
800 Grand Ave · (712) 262-0231 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
819 N Grand Ave · (712) 262-2443 · Call to confirm hours
Park
900 W 9th St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.6%17.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.4%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%2.4%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms22.8%4.2%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%3.8%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.1%16.6%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.6%20.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.5%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control33.4%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table35.4%19.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication6.5%2.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.2%73.3%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.0%20.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.4%13.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.971.491.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.352.081.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.53U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.8%CMS range 34.1–56.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.3%CMS range 8.7–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge66.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 4.8–13.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
0.58
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.26
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.38
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 62.7 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.551 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-14)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-22)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-20 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, personnel records and facility policy review on [DATE] the facility staff failed to implement CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) for one of five residents sampled (Resident #1), who was found unresponsive with no pulse or respirations and desired CPR. This resulted in immediate jeopardy to the residents health and safety. The facility identified a census of 53 current residents, 13 of which were identified by the facility with a request for CPR at the time of cardiopulmonary or respiratory arrest. The facility was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and given the IJ template on [DATE] at 12:15 PM. The immediacy had been removed on [DATE] when the facility provided staff education and review of their policy. The citation is considered a past non-compliance as the facility implemented plan of correction prior to the surveyors entrance on [DATE]. Findings include: 1. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a reference date of [DATE] documented Resident #1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review, observation, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to protect a resident from a significant medication error. A nurse committed to giving 37 units of Aspart insulin (Novolog) to Resident #47 at 9:45 AM after drawing it up from a vial, then put the vial back into the medication cart. Resident #47 has an order that reads Levemir Subcutaneous Solution 100 UNIT/ML inject 37 units subcutaneously in the morning for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #47). The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of October 25, 2023 on October 25th, 2023 at 4:40 P.M. The Facility Staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on October 26, 2023 through the following actions: a. Starting today (10/26/23), any insulin that is ordered for a resident will be verified by 2 nurses for correct insulin and correct dosage prior to administration. We will have a sheet where 2 nurses will sign off to verify that the correct insulin and correct dosage was administered.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate assessment and timely intervention to assure 2 of 3 residents (Resident #1 and #2) received prompt treatment for a change in condition. Resident #1 had urinary tract infection (UTI) symptoms on the weekend of 5/16-17/26 and the facility failed to notify the physician or initiate any other interventions related to the symptoms. Resident #1 had difficulty catching her breath after the evening meal on [DATE] and needed staff to intervene for the resident to clear it. According to the clinical record the resident sat where she could be observed for a half hour and then went to bed. The clinical record lacked documentation the staff monitored her after going to bed. She was later discovered in respiratory distress and transferred to the hospital in critical condition. Resident #1's diagnoses included UTI and pneumonia. Resident #2 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On [DATE] the nurse going off at 6 p.m. reported to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to put effective interventions in place and provide adequate nursing supervision to prevent accident and injuries from falls for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #2). Resident #2 had a risk for falls with a history of repeated falls. Resident #2 had his thirteenth fall on 3/15/25 in a three-month period of time. Findings include: Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2, indicating severe impaired cognition. The MDS listed Resident #2 as substantial/maximal assistance with rolling left and right, sit to lie, toilet transfer, supervision for toileting and chair/bed to chair transfer. The MDS described Resident #2 as frequently incontinent of urine. Resident #2's MDS included diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, cerebrovascular accident, diabetes mellitus, and renal insufficiency. The Facility Incident Reports (IR) documented revealed Resident #2 fell…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-14 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure bed hold notice was signed by residents and or the resident's responsible person when residents transferred out of the facility for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #2, #4, #5 and #9). The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #4 documented reentry to the facility on 2/20/25 for a short term hospital stay. Review of the Clinical Census report for Resident #4 revealed the following information:a. 11/25/24- hospital leaveb. 12/3/24- activec. 2/9/25- hospital d. 2/11/25- active Review of the Progress Notes for Resident #4 revealed the following:a. 12/12/24 at 2:55 PM, Resident admitted to the hospital on [DATE] for a fracture. b. 2/9/25 at 1:30 PM, Resident admitted to the hospital for emesis and repeated hospitalizations. Review of Resident #4’s chart on 8/13/25 at 9:19 AM showed the facility lacked a bed hold form for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Medication Administration Record (MAR), policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide appropriate infection prevention practices when providing care to a resident with a catheter, with wound care, and a resident with an enteral tube, that was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 5 of 7 reviewed (Resident #4, #7, #9, #14 and #38). The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #4 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #5 had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. Review of Resident #4’s MAR documented a Physician’s Order for insulin Lispro injection per sliding scale if blood glucose was 140-180 2 units. 2. The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #14 documented a BIMS of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #5 had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to have ready and reasonable access to personal funds upon request for 1 of 17 residents reviewed (Resident #10). The facility reported a census of 67. Findings Include:In an interview on 8/11/2025 12:55 PM, Resident #10 reported that if she wanted personal funds during the weekend, she had to plan to get money from the office on Friday.In an interview on 8/12/2025 at 9:25 AM, Resident #10 reported she could not remember when or which staff she asked for personal funds. Resident #10 stated, when I asked they told me that I had to wait for the office manager to be here.In an interview on 8/14/2025 at 8:38 AM, Staff C, Certified Medication Assistant/Certified Nurse Assistant (CMA/CNA) reported if a resident requested personal funds she would go to the Business Officer Manager (BOM). When asked what she would do during non-business hours, Staff C stated, I would probably try to call the head of Human Resources. When asked if a locked cash box or any other way to get funds for a resident during non-business…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to identify non-pharmacological interventions and targeted behaviors on the care plan related to high risk medications in 2 out of 5 sampled residents reviewed (Resident #4 and #21). The facility reported a census of 67 residents.Findings include: 1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #4 documented diagnoses of stroke, aphasia, and anxiety. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Clinical Physician Orders for Resident #4 showed the following orders: Seroquel Oral Tablet 25 milligram (MG) at bedtime with a start date of 4/3/25 Olanzapine Oral Tablet 10 mg daily with a start date of 7/3/25 Oxycodone Oral Tablet 5 MG every eight hours as needed for pain with a start date of 2/11/25. The Care Plan identified Resident #4: Prescribed antipsychotic medication related to anxiety and depression. The Care Plan lacked targeted behaviors to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to revise and update care plans to include a new order for oxygen usage on the comprehensive care plan for 1 of 17 residents reviewed (Resident #9). The facility reported a census of 67 residents. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #9 documented diagnoses of anemia, cancer and malnutrition. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Observation on 8/11/2025 at 11:36 AM currently wearing oxygen sitting up in bed. Observation on 8/12/2025 at 12:27 PM currently sleeping in bed with oxygen concentrator on via nasal cannula and running. Review of August Medication Administration Record (MAR) lacked orders for oxygen usage. Review of current Physician Orders lacked an order for oxygen usage. Review of the Care Plan dated 8/12/25 lacked information regarding oxygen usage. Interview on 8/13/2025 at 10:30 a.m., with the Assistant Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to have a physicians order to administer medications prior to administering medications to 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #70). The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Findings include:Resident #70's active diagnosis list included type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia and hypertension.The MDS had not been completed for a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Interview on 8/11/2025 at 12:38 p.m., with Resident #70 revealed she had a concern with her medications and the facility not having them. She further explained that on 8/9/25 she had to call the local pharmacy to get her Mounjaro (tirzepatide(diabetic medication)) delivered to the facility as they did not have it. Review of hospital discharge records revealed an order for tirzepatide every 7 days with the word hold written next to it. Review of the Order Summary Report signed by the physician on 8/5/25 lacked an order for Mounjaro. Review of current orders revealed an order for Mounjaro with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with significant weight loss were immediately identified, and assessed for nutritional needs for 1 of 2 resident's reviewed (Resident #21). The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #21 scored 3 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident's diagnoses included senile degeneration of the brain, cancer, and atrial fibrillation. The resident weighed 125#, and had a weight loss of 5% in 1 month or 10% in 6 months.The Care Plan initiated 7/30/25 identified the resident would tolerate her diet as ordered. The goal with a target date of 11/4/25, read the resident would maintain weight and nutritional balance through the review date. Interventions included diet to be followed as prescribed, monitoring food and fluid intakes daily and recording, monitoring weight as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical chart review and staff interview the facility failed to implement policies and procedures regarding the technical aspect of feeding tubes by pushing enteral medication with a syringe into enteral tube for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #9). The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #9 documented diagnoses of anemia, cancer and malnutrition. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Observation on 8/13/2025 at 2:33 p.m., with Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) setting up Resident #9's medications. Staff B explained resident is able to take medications by mouth but he sometimes will get gaggy and vomit at times so they do all crushable medications through this tube. At 2:46 p.m. Staff B entered residents room to administer medications. Staff B set up each medication on the bedside table in the medication cup and added water to the crushed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received services, consistent with professional standards of practice by communication with the dialysis center for 1 resident on dialysis (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #21 scored 3 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident's diagnoses included end stage renal disease, and end chronic obstructive pulmonary (lung) disease. The resident received dialysis. The Care Plan revised 6/19/25 identified the resident needed dialysis Monday/Wednesday/Friday with chair time of 8:30 a.m. A Notebook with the resident's name on it contained pre and post (dialysis) Vital Signs (VS) (taken at dialysis center), including blood pressure, temperature, pulse and weight in kilograms.The Notebook lacked VS between 5/2/25 and 5/9/25. On 5/26/25 a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Medication Administration Record - Treatment Administration Record (MAR-TAR), Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide 2 of 31 medications as ordered resulting in a medication error rate of 6.45. The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #4 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #5 had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications.Review of Resident #4's MAR-TAR documented a physician's order for insulin Lispro injection per sliding scale if blood glucose was 140-180 2 units at 7:30 AM and insulin Glargine inject 32 units subcutaneously one time a day at 7:00 AM.Review of Resident #4's EHR titled, Orders documented a physician's order for insulin Lispro injection per sliding scale if blood glucose was 140-180 2 units at 7:30 AM and insulin Glargine inject 32…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, Medication Administration Records - Treatment Administration Records (MAR-TAR) and Electronic Health Records (EHR) review the facility failed to ensure the residents were free of significant medication errors to 2 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #4 and #7). The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #4 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #5 had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. Review of Resident #4’s MAR-TAR documented a physician’s order for insulin Lispro injection per sliding scale if blood glucose was 140-180 2 units at 7:30 AM and insulin Glargine inject 32 units subcutaneously one time a day at 7:00 AM. Review of Resident #4’s EHR titled, Orders documented a physician’s order for insulin Lispro injection per sliding scale if blood glucose was 140-180 2 units at 7:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy, Electronic Health Record (EHR) review and staff interview the facility failed to follow the menu and prepare food to meet the residents nutritional needs for 22 of 26 residents (all residents with a regular diet) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 67 residents.Findings include:A continuous observation on 8/12/25 at 11:40 AM revealed Staff A, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) served the lunch meal. Staff A completed hand hygiene, completed temperature checks on the food, placed serving utensils in the steam table wells with the food, and began lunch service. Through the entire lunch service a 3 oz scoop was utilized to serve all regular diet peas.On 8/12/25 at 12:30 PM Staff A acknowledged the scoop utilized to serve the regular diets the peas was a 3 oz scoop and should have been a 4 oz scoop. Review of document dated 8/14/25 titled, Diet Type Report documented 22 regular diets served in that building for the lunch meal on 8/12/25.Review of document titled, Week 4 Tuesday Diet Spreadsheets the lunch menu revealed regular diets should have 4oz…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, resident family interviews, staff interview, electronic health records (EHR), document review and policy review the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurate by failing to accurately transcribe a physicians order into the EHR for 2 of 8 residents reviewed (Resident #9 and #73). The facility reported a census of 67 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #73 did not document a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) as Resident #73 was admitted on [DATE]. On 8/13/25 at 8:40 AM Staff C, Certified Medication Assistant / Certified Nurse Assistant (CMA/CNA) stated Resident #73’s MAR did not match the bubble pack for the potassium chloride ER tablet. Staff C stated MAR read potassium chloride ER give 20 mEq BID. Staff C stated Resident #73’s bubble pack for potassium chloride documented 20 mEq give 2 tablets daily. Review of Resident #73’s bubble pack for potassium chloride documented potassium…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and facility policy review, the facility failed to screen for eligibility, offer, provide education and document vaccine consent or refusal for the pneumococcal immunization for 1 of 5 resident reviewed (Resident #8) for immunizations. The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Findings include: Resident #8 Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessment identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition.Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #8 had received the Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine 13-valent (PCV13) on 05/19/20, and Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine 23-valent (PPSV23) on 10/14/98. The clinical record lacked documentation that Resident #8 was educated, offered a consent for or refusal of the Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine PCV20 or PVC21 vaccination. Review of the CDC recommendations dated October 2024 for adults 50 years or older who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Electronic Record Review (EHR), staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included problems, goals, or interventions for use of a diuretic or diagnosis of congestive heart failure, develop a comprehensive care plan that was personalized when a resident received hospice care, and did not follow a care plan for 4 of 18 residents reviewed (Resident #3, #20, #43, and #50). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #50 entered the facility on 7/3/24. The MDS also documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 9 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed diagnosis of essential (primary) hypertension and localized edema. The MDS documented use of diuretic. Review of Resident #50 ' s Physician Orders documented lasix oral tablet 40 mg (Furosemide), give 40 mg by mouth one time related to localized edema started 8/15/24 and lasix oral tablet 20 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Electronic Health Records (EHR), policy review, resident interview, and observations the facility failed to provide nursing staff to assure residents safety by not responding to call lights in a timely manner for 5 of 18 residents reviewed (Resident #1, #6, #17, #37, and #106). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of EHR documented Resident #1 resided in NN09-2. Observation on 8/20/24 at 1:05 PM of room NN09, Resident #1's room revealed the call light was on. Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) entered Resident #1 ' s room at 1:32 PM and answered the call light. Staff B told Resident #1 to let her find another CNA and would be right back. Staff B returned to Resident #1 ' s room at 1:34 PM with mechanical lift. On 8/20/24 at 1:40 PM Staff B stated Resident #1 ' s call light was on because she wanted to use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to post the daily census sheet including the facility resident census and the actual working hours of nurses and nurse aides on duty for the current date. The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: On 8/21/24 at 10:52 am, the Longhouse portion of the facility, where the census posting is to be posted, had no census posting visible. Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated it had not been completed yet for the day. She stated the prior day's posting was probably in the medication room. On 8/21/24 at 10:55 am, Staff A, LPN obtained keys to the medication room and found census sheets dated 8/16/24 - 8/19/24. When asked if a census sheet had been completed for 8/20/24 she stated she was off work that day and did not know if one had been done. A census for 8/21/24 was filled out and hung on a board in the dining room. On 8/22/24 at 11:30 am, the Administrator stated the daily census posting is to be done by the charge nurse for each shift. She stated it should be initiated by the day shift at 6:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary practices by failing to keep the ice makers clean and by improperly handling food during meal service. The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: On 8/19/24 at 11:55 AM, a north building kitchen observation revealed black and pink substance on the internal plastic ice cube guard edge. At 12:05 PM, a south building kitchen observation revealed black and pink substance on the internal plastic ice cube guard edge. On 8/20/24 at 8:17 AM, Staff G, Dietary Aide (DA), transported a gallon of milk on a cart from kitchen without the lid on it. At 8:35 AM, the Dietary Manager opened a salt & pepper packet for a resident, sprinkled the salt and pepper on the resident's eggs then put the opened packets on the resident's plate. On 8/21/24 at 11:35 AM, Staff G, cook, put a glove on her left hand and used her right hand to adjust the glove fingers. She then put a glove on her right hand, placed her right hand on a non-food preparation counter, opened a drawer, and grabbed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide appropriate infection prevention practices by not covering the clean linen cart when moving between buildings and in hallways at the facility, not disinfecting wheelchair after contaminated during personal cares for a resident with transmission based precautions, not completing hand hygiene and changing gloves in accordance with standards of practice and touched back of medication cards to cups used to distribute medications for 6 of 12 residents reviewed, (Resident #7, #20, #37, #14, #18 and #50). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings included: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #50 entered the facility on 7/3/24. The MDS also documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 9 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed indwelling catheter utilized by Resident #50. Observation on 8/21/24 at 8:35 AM Staff E cleansed the tip of catheter tubing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical policy, observation, and staff interview the facility failed to provide a call light system within reach of a resident in contact precautions and accommodate the needs of a resident with closet door hanging unable to be opened for 2 of 18 residents reviewed, ( Resident #9 and #22). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #22 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. On 8/20/24 at 8:22 AM observation of Resident #22 lying in bed in his room with a call light not within reach lying on a recliner on the opposite side of the room as his bed . Resident #22 ' s door was closed related to transmission based precautions (TBP). On 8/20/24 at 8:22 AM Resident #22 stated he was unable to find his call light. Resident #22 stated he utilized the call light when in need of staff assistance. Review of Resident #22 ' s Care Plan documented contact and droplet isolation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to include psychotropic medications in the baseline care plan for 1 of 18 residents reviewed (Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated completely intact cognition. It included diagnoses of Diabetes Mellitus, Cerebrovascular Accident (stroke), depression, and metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused be chemical imbalance). It indicted he took an antidepressant within the 7-day look-back period. It also indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 8/20/24 at 2:52 PM, Resident #8 stated he took antidepressant medication and had been on it for a long time. The hospital Discharge Home Medication List directed Resident #8 to continue taking duloxetine (Cymbalta) 60 mg capsule, delayed release daily, by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 18 residents reviewed, (Resident #19). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #19 dated 6/7/24 documented diagnoses that included: non Alzheimer's dementia and depression. The MDS documented the resident received antidepressant medications during the assessment reference period. The current Care Plan of Resident #19 documented a Focus Area dated 5/7/24 of antidepressant medication use (mirtazapine and sertraline) related to depression. The Medication History of Resident #19 reflected that the resident's order for Mirtazapine (an anti depressant medication) was discontinued on 6/11/24. The Psychotropic Med Use Detail Report from the facility's pharmacy, dated July 2024, also reflected Mirtazapine to have been discontinued 6/11/24. The Nursing Note dated 6/11/24 at 1:50 pm documented Received signed medication review for Mirtazapine 'Stop Mirtazapine' . On 8/21/24 at 11:07 am,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders to obtain a resident's weight following admission for 1 of 18 residents reviewed (Resident #106). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment of Resident #106 dated 8/15/24 documented the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated cognition intact. On 8/19/24 at 2:10 pm, Resident #106 reported she does not care for the food. She stated the food is cold and she has to supply her own seasonings. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for August of 2024 for Resident #106 documented an order for Obtain weight upon admission, daily x 3 days, then weekly on Monday day shift x 4 weeks. The MAR reflected that Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) had documented the weight being done on August 10th, August 11th, August 12th, August 14th, and August…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a Restorative Exercise Program to prevent a worsening of range of motion for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, (Resident #27). The facility reported a census of 53. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #27 dated 8/9/24 identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the resident to have a functional limitation in range of motion affecting all 4 limbs. The MDS revealed the resident to be totally dependent upon staff for eating, bed mobility, dressing, toileting and transferring. The MDS documented the resident as unable to walk. The initial Care Plan for Resident #27 documented a Focus Area of Idiopathic Neuropathy/Radiculopathy, Lumbar Region, with a history of Cerebral Infarction. It indicated the resident used a mechanical lift to transfer and had an inability to ambulate, revision date 11/27/21. The Care Plan directed staff to follow a Restorative Exercise program for Functional Maintenance. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to attempt a Gradual Dose Reduction for 2 of 5 residents reviewed, (Residents #14 and #19). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #19 dated 6/7/24 documented diagnoses that included: non Alzheimer's dementia and depression. The MDS documented the resident received antidepressant medications during the assessment reference period. The MDS recorded the residents experienced no mood symptoms of feeling down, depressed or hopeless during the previous 2 weeks look back period. The MDS recorded the resident had no documented behaviors during the 7 day look back period. The Medication History of Resident #19 reflected the resident's order for Sertraline (an anti depressant medication) was decreased from 25 mg to 12.5 mg on 7/21/2023. The Psychotropic Med Use Detail Report from the facility's pharmacy, dated July 2024, also reflected Sertraline to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, menu review, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to serve the correct therapeutic diet for one of one resident who was ordered a renal diet, (Resident #15). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #15 dated 6/14/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated completely intact cognition. It included diagnoses of anemia, Coronary Artery Disease (CAD - heart disease), Heart Failure (HF), hypertension, renal (kidney) disease, and Diabetes Mellitus. It indicated the resident received a therapeutic diet within the 7-day look-back period. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) included a Physician Order for a renal diet dated 10/05/22. On 8/21/24 at 12:15 PM, Staff G, cook, placed a small steam pan of carrots on the steam table. At 12:20 PM, lunch meal service began and Staff G was observed serving Resident #15 regular diet menu items. At 12:58 PM, Staff G stated she did not know why the carrots were sent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview the facility failed to provide for resident ' s dignity during dining when staff engaged in conversation that was not resident focused. The facility reported a census of 54 residents. Findings include: Observation on 3/13/24 at 12:32 p.m., Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and Staff B, CNA were seated at a table of 6 residents that were being assisted with meals. Staff A and Staff B were conversing between each other regarding personal issues and not interacting with the residents as they were being assisted with eating their meals. Interview on 3/14/24 at 12:53 p.m., with the Administrator revealed the staff should have been focused on the residents and involving them in the conversations. The Administrator revealed this topic is discussed quite often at staff meetings and discussed the focus should be on the residents when the staff is assisting them. In an electronic mail communication from the Administrator on 3/14/23 at 2:29 p.m., revealed the facility has staff do a course online on orientation and then yearly on Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to provide bathing assistance twice weekly for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for bathing (Resident #1, #3 and #5). The facility reported a census of 54 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented diagnoses of obesity, rheumatoid arthritis and respiratory failure. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed Resident #1 required substantial or maximal assistance with shower or bathe self including washing, rinsing and drying self and revealed Resident #1 was dependent on staff for transfers in and out of the shower or tub. Review of Resident #1 ' s Care Plan with a revision date of 3/4/24 revealed shower twice per week and assist with bathing. Review of Resident #1 ' s Task List revealed bathing as needed and Wednesday and Saturday. Review of report titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, infection control policy and staff interview, the facility failed to provide proper hand hygiene with incontinence care with 2 of 3 residents (Resident #3 and #6) observed. The facility reported a total census of 54 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 3/13/24 at 10:11 a.m., of Resident #3 being assisted by Staff C, CNA and Staff D, CNA to lay down after breakfast. Staff C and Staff D performed hand hygiene upon entering Resident #3 ' s room. Staff C and Staff D applied gloves and assisted Resident #3 onto the bed with the mechanical lift to lay down. Staff C and Staff D assisted Resident #3 with removing soiled lift sheet, pants and underwear as Resident #3 was incontinent of urine and feces. Staff C and Staff D removed soiled gloves and reapplied gloves without performing hand hygiene. Staff C picked up clean wipes and perineal cream off the nightstand and laid them on Resident #3 ' s bed. Staff C picked up a clean dry wipe and applied perineal cream and performed appropriate perineal care. Repeating this on the front of the genitals and the hips,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review, record review, resident interview and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a comprehensive care plan related to catheterization to a resident with placement of indwelling catheter, a resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease / respiratory compromise and a resident with pain to 3 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #3, #45 and #13). The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #3 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) not completed. The MDS revealed short and long term memory problems. MDS also revealed cognitive skills for daily decision making severely impaired. Review of Electronic Health Records (EHR) revealed Resident #3 returned from the hospital 9/20/23 with an indwelling catheter in place. Review of Resident #3 ' s medication administration records (MAR) revealed an order to change 16 French catheter as needed if leaking. During an observation on 10/25/23 of catheter cares…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review, electronic health records review, observation, policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a professional standard of quality by not following physician orders for 3 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #18, #47, and #207). The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #18 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment. An observation of medication administration on 10/24/23 at 7:56 AM revealed Staff D obtained medications from medication cart for Resident #18. Staff D obtained a liquid Potassium bottle with syringe rubber banded to the side of the bottle for Resident #18. Staff D poured liquid Potassium from the bottle into the medication cup. Potassium measured over 5 mL and under 7.5 mL. No measurement on the side of the medication cup for 6 mL. Staff D administered liquid medication to Resident #18. Review of medication administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to assure resident's received baths as planned for 4 of 15 resident's reviewed (Resident #4, #13, #51 and #47 ). The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: 1) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #4 scored 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance with bathing. The resident had diagnoses including cerebral palsy, aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech), stroke, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and hemiplegia or hemiparesis (paralysis or weakness of 1 side of the body). The Care Plan revised 1/19/23 identified the resident had impaired ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL's) related to cognitive impairment and disease process. The interventions included whirlpools or shower twice per week, and assist with bathing. The Care Plan identified dated 1/19/23 identified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to assure functional maintenance programs were completed as planned for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #4, #13, and #8). The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: 1) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #4 scored 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) including bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The resident had limitation in range of motion (ROM) of the upper and lower extremities on both sides. The resident had diagnoses including cerebral palsy, aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech), stroke, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and hemiplegia or hemiparesis (paralysis or weakness of 1 side of the body). The Care Plan identified the resident had mobility impaired related to a chronic and advancing neuromuscular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review, electronic health records review, observation, policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater by having a medication error rate of 14.29 percent. The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #18 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment. An observation of medication administration on 10/24/23 at 7:56 AM revealed Staff D obtained medications from medication cart for Resident #18. Staff D obtained a liquid Potassium bottle with syringe rubber banded to the side of the bottle for Resident #18. Staff D poured liquid Potassium from the bottle into the medication cup. Potassium measured over 5 mL and under 7.5 mL. No measurement on the side of the medication cup for 6 mL. Staff D administered liquid medication to Resident #18. Review of medication administration record (MAR) revealed an order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to secure medications in a locked compartment, label with open dates and remove medication after expiration date. The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: 1. An observation on [DATE] at 9:45 AM Staff E pushed the medication cart down the hall. Staff E opened the drawer on the medication cart. Staff E removed the bubble pack from the medication cart. Staff E removed residents medications from the bubble pack. Staff E returned the bubble pack to the medication cart drawer. Staff E entered the residents room and did not lock the medication cart. Staff E then closed the door to the residents room. Staff E gave the medications to the resident. The resident took medication on her own with water wash down. Staff E walked out into the hall during the medication administration still able to observe the resident and locked the medication cart. Staff E walked back into the room and stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, menu review and staff interview, the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: The menu for the evening meal 10/24/23 included 1/2 a grilled tuna melt. On 10/24/23 at 5:47 p.m. Staff C [NAME] washed her hands and put on gloves. She touched multiple surfaces including the counter, the steam table, the diet cards, and the refrigerator to get something out of it. She then dumped out scrambled eggs squares on to a plate and touched both of them to turn them over, wearing the same gloves. During the meal service, she picked up some of the sandwiches with a pair of tongs and put the sandwich directly on the plate. Other times she picked the sandwich up with the tongs and then used her gloved hand to put it on the plate. Sometimes she just picked the sandwich up with her gloved hand and placed it on the plate. There were a minimum of 9 times when she touched the sandwiches that she was sending out to serve. She did not change her gloves throughout the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide appropriate infection prevention practices when providing personal care for 1 of 1 residents, during medication administration, and failed to review the infection control policy annually with appropriate staff. The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #33 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment. MDS also revealed diagnosis of monoplegia of upper limb following cerebral infarction affecting left nondominant side and contracture of right and left knee. An observation on 10/24/23 at 8:56 AM of peri care on resident #33 revealed Staff H and Staff F completed peri cares. Staff H and Staff F completed hand hygiene and donned gloves. Staff H removed Resident #33 ' s pants. Staff F removed Resident #33 ' s briefs. Staff H completed peri care on groin and penis using single swipes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-30 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect resident from the use of physical restraint that the resident could not remove on their own (Resident #18 and #27). The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #18 documented diagnoses of non-Alzheimer ' s Dementia, repeated falls and anxiety disorder. The MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Observation on 10/23/23 at 1:59 p.m., revealed a pillow under the fitted sheet on Resident #18 ' s left side of her back under the fitted sheet. 2) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #27 had long and short term memory problems and moderately impaired skills for daily decision making. The resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, eating, and personal hygiene. The resident did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-30 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to refer 1 resident with a negative Level I result for the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), who was later identified with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or other related condition, to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASRR evaluation and determination for 1 out of 1 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for PASRR requirements. The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #10 documented diagnoses anxiety disorder, depression and psychotic disorder. The MDS included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed an active diagnosis of anxiety disorder, depression and psychotic disorder. Review of Resident #1 ' s active diagnosis in her medical chart revealed delusional disorders, hallucinations unspecified, anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan to reflect the resident's current status for 2 of 15 residents reviewed (Resident #13 and #33). The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #13 scored 5 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) including bed mobility, transfer, personal hygiene and bathing. The resident had diagnoses including diabetes, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and Parkinson's disease. The MDS documented the resident received antipsychotic, antidepressant, antianxiety, and hypnotic medication. The October 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed the resident received the following medications: a. Clonazepam 0.5 mg at bedtime for sleep with a start date 4/7/23. b. Escitalopram 20 mg in the morning related to other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review, Electronic Health Records (EHR), and staff interviews the facility failed to provide dialysis services consistent with professional standards by not completing a post dialysis assessment to 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #20). The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Finding include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #20 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented diagnosis of end stage renal disease. Review of a document titled Dialysis Flow Record for Resident #20 revealed no documentation of dressing conditions. Review of EHR for Resident #20 revealed no documentation of dressing conditions. Review of Resident #20 ' s Care Plan revealed an intervention to monitor, document, and report as needed any signs or symptoms of infection to the access site: redness, swelling, warmth, or drainage. Review of undated document titled Care Plan Approach for Dialysis Patients for Resident #20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$24,706 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-05-20
  • $10,273 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-24 for 7 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.2-2.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 54.4-2.4 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5St. Joseph's Rehabilitation and Care CenterNorfolk, NE

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GATEWAY HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/22/2024
BURNAM, SOONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/22/2024
FELDMANN, BRUCEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
KOENIG, DEBRAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/22/2024
JORGENSEN, DAVIDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/08/2025
KEETCH, CHADIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/08/2025
PORT, BARRYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/05/2025
DEWEY HEALTH HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
STANDARD BEARER HEALTHCARE OP, LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
THE ENSIGN GROUP INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$94K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 56%Medicare 8%Other / private 35%

This home reported $94K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$289per resident / day
operating cost
$8,776per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$314per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165449. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next