No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

4835 South 49th Street, Omaha, NE 68117 · For profit - Corporation · 70 certified beds · (402) 733-7200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0606) — cited Oct 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation$39,146 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Oct 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $39,146 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-10)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1319 Leavenworth St · (402) 592-4400 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5051 L St · (402) 541-0823 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5051 L St · (402) 541-0820 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4220 Q St · (402) 444-5900 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.9%19.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.6%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.0%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%2.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms74.6%4.3%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%4.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.8%18.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.0%19.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.9%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.3%4.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.4%25.9%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.2%20.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.2%2.0%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.7%75.9%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.8%20.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.3%11.4%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.711.811.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.561.921.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
43.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.52U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 43.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.4%CMS range 36.5–57.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 7.0–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge43.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge57.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified73.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 4.1–12.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.32
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.77
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 57.3 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-31)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D7 Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to implement interventions to prevent elopement for 2 (Resident 31 and 50) of 2 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 62. The findings are: A Record review of the Policy and Procedure for Elopement with a revision date of 2/2022 revealed residents identified to be at risk for elopement will have an individualized care plan and interventions implemented. Residents whose assessment identified wandering behavior shall also be considered at risk for elopement. If the resident is identified at risk for elopement, the following steps will be taken and or verified that completed by the individual completing the assessment: -An alarm bracelet may be placed on the resident to audibly alert staff of attempts to exit. -The residents care plan shall address behavior using resident specific goals and approaches as assessed by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT). -Residents with an elopement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)(i)(1)Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to transfer a resident according to the plan of care resulting in a significant injury for 1 (Resident 32) of 1 resident sampled for transfers; and the facility failed to implement call interventions identified on the plan of care for 1 (Resident 68) of 3 residents sampled for falls. The facility staff identified a census of 64.The findings are:A. Record review of Resident 68’s Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 06-23-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored at a 9. According to the MDS Manual a score of 8-12 indicates a person has moderate cognitive impairment. -required supervision and hands on assistance with transfers, toileting, hygiene and dressing. -had repeated falls. Record review of Resident 68’s Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) dated 03-10-2025 revealed Resident 68…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D). Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's were free of significant medication errors for 1 (Resident 47) of 5 residents sampled. The facility census was 64. The findings are: Record review of Resident 47's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 07-12-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident:-admitted to the facility on [DATE].- had a subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding that occurs in the space between the brain and the surrounding membrane).-Brief Interview of Mental Status was scored at a 12. According to the MDS Manual a score of 8-12 indicates moderate cognitive impairment.-required total assistance with toileting-required moderate assistance with bed mobility, toilet transfers and lower body dressing.-required supervision with upper body dressing, and hygiene- was taking high risk medications including antipsychotics, antianxiety,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(J)(i)(1) Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility staff failed to evaluate and implement interventions to prevent significant weight loss for 1 (Resident 2) of 3 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 63. Findings are: Record review of Resident 2's Order Summary Report (OSR) printed on 10-30-2024 revealed Resident 2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of: Hyperlipidemia (fat particles in the blood system) Hypokalemia (low potassium level) Muscle weakness, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Disorder of Plasma-protein Metabolism, Unspecified Protein Calorie Malnutrition. According to the OSR printed on 10-30-2024 Resident 2's diet was a general regular diet. Record review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 9-25-2024 revealed Resident 2 was assessed with a Brief Interview of mental Status (BIMs, a score from the BIMS assessment that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12.006.09D2a Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to ensure an air loss mattress was set to relieve pressure and failed to reposition for pressure relief for 1(Resident 16) of 3 sampled resident resulting in additional pressure ulcers. The facility staff identified a census of 62. The findings are: Review of Resident 16's electronic medical record revealed that Resident 16 was hospitalized on [DATE] and returned to the facility on 4/19/23 with the following identified wound areas: - Coccyx unstageable (full thickness tissue loss in which the actual depth of the ulcer is completely obscured by slough (yellow, tan, gray, green or brown) and/or eschar (tan, brown, or black) in the wound bed) pressure ulcer. - Left and right gluteal folds stage 1 pressure ulcer (a red nonblanchable area with no open areas). -Right 3rd toe trauma, right 4th toe trauma, right 4th toe base trauma, right 5th toe trauma, right 3rd/4th toe, right 4th/5th toe.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D8a Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place to prevent a significant weight loss and ensure hydration for 1 (Resident 16) of 4 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 62. The findings are: On 04/30/23 at 10:30 AM interview was conducted with Resident 16's family member which revealed Resident 16 had lost weight and the family member didn't think the facility ever gave Resident 16 breakfast. Continued interview in Resident 16's room revealed there was not a water pitcher available for Resident 16. During the interview Resident 16's family member reported the facility never has a pitcher of water for Resident 16. The facility may bring the resident a glass of water at times. Record review of Resident 16's documented weights in the electronic medical records revealed the following; -4/21/2023 at 12:55 PM, 152.1 Lbs in the wheelchair -4/19/2023 at 1:57 PM, 152.5 Lbs in the wheelchair -4/10/2023 at 9:04 PM, 152.7 Lbs -3/13/2023 at 9:41 PM, 152.6 Lbs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.10D Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to ensure 2 (Resident 44 and 171) of 10 sampled residents were free of significant medication errors. The facility staff identified a census of 62. Findings are: A. Record review of an Order Summary Report (OSR) sheet printed on 5-03-2023 of active orders for Resident 171 revealed Resident 171 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses that included Diabetes, Major Depressive Disorder and Dementia. Further review of Resident 171's OSR printed on 5-03-2023 revealed Resident 171's practitioner ordered medications that included Lispro insulin 4 units to be given before meals and further ordered if Resident 171's blood sugar (BS) levels were between 7 and 120 the Lispro insulin was to be held. Record review of Resident 171's Medication Administration record (MAR) for 6-2021 revealed the following information: - June,2021 at 7:30 AM: -6-19-2021, BS was 89 and insulin was administered.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)(i)(1). Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented for 1(Resident 2) of 4 residents sampled. The facility census was 57. The findings are: Record review of the facility policy titled Incidents and Accidents dated 12-2023 revealed it is the policy of the facility for staff to report, investigate, and review any accidents or incidents that occur or allegedly occur, on facility property and may involve or allegedly involve a resident. The purpose of incident reporting can include:-assuring that appropriate and immediate interventions are implemented and corrective actions are taken to prevent recurrences and improve the management of resident care. -meeting regulatory requirements for analysis and reporting of incidents and accidents. Licensed staff will utilize Risk Management to report incidents/accidents and assist with completion of any investigative information to identify root causes. Record review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to implement pain management interventions during the provision of wound care for 1 (Resident 1) of 2 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 50.The findings are:Record review of a facility policy entitled Pain Recognition and Management revised 04/2025 revealed: -2. To the extent possible, staff will: -a. Recognize when a resident is experiencing pain and identify circumstances when pain can be anticipated; -b. Evaluate existing pain and the causes; and -c. Manages or prevents pain, consistent with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care, current professional standards of practice, and the resident's goals and preferences. -4. Management: -b. Medication(s) received, refused and response to medication will be documented on the Electronic Medication Administration Record (e-MAR). -c. If the pain management program is not effective, the licensed nurse will contact the resident's physician.Record review of Resident 1's Clinical Census printed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 1-005.06(D)Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes during the provision of wound care for 1 (Resident 2) of 3 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 50.The findings are:Record review of a facility policy entitled Hand Hygiene revised 10/2022 revealed facility staff were to perform an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62 percent (%) alcohol; or alternatively, soap and water before handling clean or soiled dressings, gauze pads, etc.; before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during resident care; after handling used dressings and contaminated equipment; and after removing gloves.Observation on 10/7/2025 from 9:54 AM through 10:05 AM of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-A performing wound care treatments for Resident 2 revealed LPN-A washed hands with soap and water for 32 seconds and donned (applied) a gown and gloves. LPN-A washed the resident's right and left posterior thighs. LPN-A doffed (removed) gloves, and without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-31 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number NAC 175 12-006.19(A)Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an intact door seal was present on a refrigerator in the kitchen, resulting in the potential for inconsistent food temperatures. This had the ability to affect 62 of 64 residents who ate food produced by the kitchen.Findings are:An observation on 7/25/2025 revealed the middle refrigerator door in the kitchen had a broken seal and did not close completely.An observation on 7/30/2025 at 6:15AM with Dietary Aide C of the kitchen refrigerator confirmed the temperature reading on the portable temperature gauge behind the broken seal read 32 degrees.An observation on 7/30/2025 at 6:45AM with the Dietary Manager revealed the temperature reading on the portable temperature gauge behind the broken seal on the refrigerator door revealed the temperature was 41 degrees.An interview on 7/30/2025 at 6:15AM with Dietary Aide C confirmed the temperature gauge behind the broken refrigerator seal read 32 degrees.An interview on 7/30/2025 at 6:45AM with the DM confirmed the refrigerator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05 (G) The facility failed to ensure residents were free from chemical restraints for 1 (Resident 47) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 64. The findings are:Record review of Resident 47's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 07-12-2025 revealed the following about the resident:-admitted to the facility on [DATE].- had a subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding that occurs in the space between the brain and the surrounding membrane).-Brief Interview of Mental Status was scored at a 12. According to the MDS Manual a score of 8-12 indicates moderate cognitive impairment.-required total assistance with toileting-required moderate assistance with bed mobility, toilet transfers and lower body dressing.-required supervision with upper body dressing, and hygiene-was taking high risk medications including antipsychotics, antianxiety, antidepressants, anticoagulants, diuretics, and opioids. Record review of Resident 47's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H)The facility failed to report a transfer which resulted in significant injury to the State Agency for 1 (Resident 32) of 1 resident sampled. The facility staff identified a census of 64.The findings are:Record review of a facility policy entitled Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against dated revised 10/2022 revealed:The facility will provide oversight and monitoring to ensure that its staff, who are agents of the facility, deliver care and services in a way that promotes and respects the rights of the residents to be from [sic] abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation.This policy applies to all facility staff including, but not limited to, employees, consultants, contractors, volunteers, students, and other caregivers who provide care and services to residents on behalf of the facility.Definition:Neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress.2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to investigate a resident transfer which resulted in significant injury for 1 (Resident 32) of 1 resident sampled. The facility staff identified a census of 64.The findings are:Record review of a facility policy entitled Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against dated revised 10/2022 revealed:The facility will provide oversight and monitoring to ensure that its staff, who are agents of the facility, deliver care and services in a way that promotes and respects the rights of the residents to be from [sic] abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation.This policy applies to all facility staff including, but not limited to, employees, consultants, contractors, volunteers, students, and other caregivers who provide care and services to residents on behalf of the facility.Definitions:Neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 (c)(ii)Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a significant change assessment for 1 (Resident 44) of 21 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 64.Record review of the Centers for Medicare and (&) Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's (RAI) Manual dated October 2023 revealed: -A significant change is a major decline or improvement in a resident's status that: -1. Will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions, the decline is not considered self-limiting; -2. Impacts more than one area of the resident's health status; and -3. Requires interdisciplinary review and/or revision of the care plan. -When a resident's status changes and it is not clear whether the resident meets the significant change in status assessment guidelines, the nursing home may take up to 14 days to determine whether…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(E)Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(iii)Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a respiratory care plan including the use of a bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP, a technique that is used for relieving breathing problems (such as those associated with sleep apnea or congestive heart failure) by pumping a flow of air through the nose to prevent the narrowing or collapse of air passages or to help the lungs expand) non-invasive ventilator for 1 (Resident 65) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 64.The findings are:Record review of a facility policy entitled Care Planning dated reviewed 5/2021 revealed: -It is the policy of this facility that the interdisciplinary team (IDT) shall develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. The care plan will be revised as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 12-006.09(H)(v)Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent a potential decrease in range of motion for 1 (Resident 7) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 64.The findings are:Record review of a facility policy entitled Adaptive Equipment dated revised 10/2023 revealed:It is the policy of this facility to evaluate and provide adaptive equipment for residents who have been identified for at risk for contractures, skin breakdown, etc.Procedures: 1. On admission the resident will be assessed for needs for adaptive devices. 2. Residents needing adaptive equipment will be screened by therapy or nursing and equipment will be supplied for respective resident. 3. Residents will be assessed quarterly for continued needs of the adaptive equipment.Record review of Resident 7's Census List printed 7/27/2025 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 1/24/2025.Record review of Resident 7's Medical Diagnoses printed 7/27/2025 identified the resident had diagnoses which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iv)(1). Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform catheter care in a manner to prevent cross contamination for Resident 9; and the facility failed to assess an indwelling catheter for continued use for Resident 7. The facility census was 64. The findings are: A.Record review of Resident 9's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 06-16-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored at 12. According to the MDS Manual a score of 8-12 indicates a person has moderate cognitive impairment. -required total assistance with hygiene, dressing, toileting, bathing, bed mobility and transfers. -had a urinary catheter. Record review of the Resident 9's Order Summary Report (OSR) printed on 07-30-2025 revealed an order dated 06-12-2025 for indwelling catheter care every shift. Observation on 07-30-2025 at 9:40 AM of Nursing Assistant (NA) J providing catheter care to Resident 9…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(vi)(3)(g)Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain and implement physician's orders for the use of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) non-invasive ventilator for 1 (Resident 65) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 64.The findings are:Record review of Resident 65's admission Record printed 7/29/2025 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 5/29/2025. Further review of the admission record identified Resident 65 had diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation (a-fib, very rapid uncoordinated contractions of the atria of the heart resulting in a lack of synchronism between heartbeat and pulse beat), anxiety an abnormal and overwhelming sense of apprehension and fear often marked by physical signs, by doubt concerning the reality and nature of the threat, and by self-doubt about one's capacity to cope with it), heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, pulmonary disease that is characterized by chronic typically irreversible airway…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 The facility failed to notify the practitioner of irregularities identified in the admission medication regimen review for 1 (Resident 47) of 1 resident's sampled. The facility census was 64. The findings are:Record review of Resident 47's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 07-12-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident:-admitted to the facility on [DATE].- had a subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding that occurs in the space between the brain and the surrounding membrane).-Brief Interview of Mental Status was scored at a 12. According to the MDS Manual a score of 8-12 indicates moderate cognitive impairment.-required total assistance with toileting-required moderate assistance with bed mobility, toilet transfers and lower body dressing.-required supervision with upper body dressing, and hygiene- was taking high risk medications including antipsychotics, antianxiety, antidepressants,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-005 (G) The facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary medications for 1 (Resident 47) of 5 residents sampled. The facility census was 64. The findings are:Record review of Resident 47's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 07-12-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident:-admitted to the facility on [DATE].- had a subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding that occurs in the space between the brain and the surrounding membrane).-Brief Interview of Mental Status was scored at a 12. According to the MDS Manual a score of 8-12 indicates moderate cognitive impairment.-required total assistance with toileting-required moderate assistance with bed mobility, toilet transfers and lower body dressing.-required supervision with upper body dressing, and hygiene- was taking high risk medications including antipsychotics, antianxiety, antidepressants, anticoagulants, diuretics, and opioids.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for 1 (Resident 32) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 64.The findings are:Record review of Resident 32's Clinical Census printed 7/27/2025 identified the facility admitted the resident on 4/21/2025.Record review of Resident 32's Medical Diagnoses printed 7/27/2025included cirrhosis of the liver (widespread disruption of normal liver structure by fibrosis and the formation of regenerative nodules that is caused by any of various chronic progressive conditions affecting the liver [such as long-term alcohol abuse or hepatitis]), muscle weakness, generalized edema, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a common form of diabetes mellitus that develops especially in adults and most often in obese individuals and that is characterized by hyperglycemia resulting from impaired insulin utilization coupled with the body's inability to compensate with increased insulin production).Record review of Resident 32's admission Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18B Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE (gowns, gloves, masks and face shields)), during cares for 2 (Resident 10 and Resident 16) of 2 sampled residents, which were both identified to require Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP (A form of infection control to minimize transmission of infectious disease). Findings are: A.An observation on 07/29/2025 at 10:25 AM revealed a sign on Resident 10's door that indicated the resident was in EBP and the required PPE that should be worn by staff. An observation on 07/29/2025 at 10:25 AM revealed Certified Nursing Assistant-A (CNA) and CNA- B entered Resident 10's room and donned (put gloves on) gloves without performing any hand hygiene. During this observation, CNA-B turned the resident and preformed standard perineal care. CNA-B doffed (removed gloves) gloves, and applied Alcohol Based Hand Rub (ABHR) before donning a new pair of gloves to complete the Perineal care. CNA-B then doffed the gloves and donned a new pair of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Nebraska Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to manage pain for 1 (Resident 5) of 4 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 65.The findings are:Record review of Resident 5's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 08/27/19 and identified Resident 5 had diagnoses which included pneumonia, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuritis (an autoimmune disorder that attacks the nerve cell coverings), carpal tunnel of unspecified upper limb, neuropathy (nerve pain), chronic pain, and osteoarthritis.Record review of Resident 5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and help nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 05/01/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 14. According to the MDS manual, a BIMS score of 14 indicated that the resident had intact cognition. Further review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Nebraska Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.12Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were available for 1 (Resident 5) of 4 residents sampled. The facility staff identified a census of 65.The findings are: Record review of Resident 5's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 08/27/19 and identified Resident 5 had diagnoses which included pneumonia, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuritis (an autoimmune disorder that attacks the nerve cell coverings), carpal tunnel of unspecified upper limb, neuropathy (nerve pain), chronic pain, and osteoarthritis.Record review of Resident 5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and help nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 05/01/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 14. According to the MDS manual, a BIMS score of 14 indicated that the resident had intact cognition. Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Nebraska Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to evaluate the potential for allergy to medication for 2 (Resident 4 & 5) of 4 residents sampled. The facility staff identified a census of 65.The findings are:A. Record review of Resident 5's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 08/27/19 and identified Resident 5 had diagnoses which included respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, pulmonary disease that is characterized by chronic typically irreversible airway obstruction resulting in a slowed rate of exhalation), pneumonia, and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuritis (an autoimmune disorder that attacks the nerve cell coverings).Record review of Resident 5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and help nursing home staff identify health problems) revealed a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a signed Advance Directive Code Status Form was completed to confirm resident's directives for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR, an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating) for 1 [Resident 1] of 6 sampled residents. The facility had a total census of 63 residents. Findings are: A record review of Resident 1's admission Record revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's admission Record identified the following diagnoses: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, congestive heart failure [weakened heart muscle that cannot pump blood effectively], and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems]. A record review of Resident 1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) dated [DATE] revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(1) Based on observations, record review, and interview; the facility staff failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for 1 (Resident 2 and 4) of 3 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 63. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 2's Order Summary Report (OSR) printed on 10-30-2024 revealed Resident 2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of: Hyperlipidemia (fat particles in the blood system) Hypokalemia (low potassium level) Muscle weakness, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Disorder of Plasma-protein Metabolism, Unspecified Protein Calorie Malnutrition. Further review of OSR printed on 10-30-24 revealed Resident 2's practitioner ordered Resident 2 to have a Prevalon boot (device used to help with preventing pressure ulcers to heels) to the left foot while in bed. Record review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(l) Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to implement additional interventions to prevent falls for 1 (Resident 4) of 4 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 63. Findings are: Record review of Resident 4's Order Summary Report (OSR) printed on 10-30-2024 revealed Resident 4 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Schizoaffective disorder, Depression, Obesity, and need for assistance with personal Cares. Record review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool used to evaluate the health status of residents in long-term care (LTC) nursing facilities) dated 10-02-2024 revealed Resident 4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a score from the BIMS assessment that indicates a person's cognitive function) of a 15. According to the MDS [NAME] a BIMS of 13 to 15 indicates a person is cognitively intact. Further review of Resident 4's MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(3) Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to follow practitioners orders for wound care for 1 (Resident 3) of 3 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 60. Findings are: Record review of an Order Summary Report (OSR) sheet printed on 10-01-2024 revealed Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Hypertension, Severe Sepsis with Septic Shock ( infection with severe complication) and Diabetes. Further review of the OSR sheet printed on 10-01-2024 revealed Resident 3's practitioner order a treatment to Resident 3's left foot second toe as follows: -Lt (left) 2nd toe: clean with mild soap and water, pat dry, apply betadine ( a antiseptic used for skin disinfection) and allow to dry. Cover with a non-adherent dressing and secure it with Kerlex and tape. Record review of a Office Visit Form (OVF) dated 9-26-2024 revealed Resident 3 had gone to their practitioner due to a toe nail…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18B3 Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18A(1) Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain walls, floors, resident equipment, fixtures, air conditioning and ventilation covers in a clean, safe and functional manner in 9 rooms (Rooms 231, 232, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240), which had the potential to affect 14 of 14 residents that utilized those rooms. The total number of occupied resident rooms on the second-floor north hallway, rooms 231 thru 240, was 9. The facility census was 58. Findings are: Observations on 06/10/24 from 7:54 AM through 9:00 AM revealed the following: -Multiple dark brown smeared substance, resembling bowel movement, noted on toilet riser and toilet seat in room [ROOM NUMBER]. -Floor radiator cover was open and exposed in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The opening was approximately 8 inches by 2 inches exposing air conditioner conduit. -One missing drawer in a 6-drawer built in dresser near the sink in room [ROOM NUMBER].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09D1b Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to to maintain functional ambulation for 1 (Resident 19), failed to follow up a audiology appointment for 1 (Resident 1) of a total sample of 4. The facility staff identified a census of 59. Findings are: A. Record Review of Resident 19's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 02-02-2024 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment that aids in detecting cognitive impairment. A score of 0-7 equals severe impairment, 8-12 indicates moderate impairment and 13-15 indicates cognitively intact) score of 15 indicating cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated Resident 19 had diagnosis of High Blood Pressure, Peripheral Vascular Disease with toe amputation, End Stage Renal Disease currently on dialysis, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and Heart Failure. The MDS also indicated Resident 19's vision was severely impaired and Resident 19 needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.090 Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a complete dose of seizure medication as ordered for 1 (Resident 34) of 5 residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 58. Findings are: Record review of Resident 34's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP, a document that details goals, action steps and appropriate timelines to address a resident's medical, behavioral health and social services needs)) initiated on 12/10/2021 revealed Resident 34 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Cerebral Infarction (stroke- occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain), Hydrocephalus (is a buildup of fluid in ventricles of the brain), Alcohol dependence ( a chronic disease in which a person craves drinks that contain alcohol and is unable to control drinking), Traumatic Subarachnoid hemorrhage (pathologic presence of blood with the subarachnoid spaces in the brain,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.17B Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) while preforming cares for Resident's 34,53 and 215 and failed to ensure an oxygen nasal cannula did not come in contact with the floor for Resident 3. The total sample size was 11 resident reviewed for infection control practices. The facility census was 58. Findings are: A. Record review of the facility (Enhanced Barrier Protection policy) EBP dated 2/2024 revealed catheter care is considered a high-contact resident care activity. According to the facility EHB policy dated 2/2024, catheter care/ toileting/ brief changes require a gown and gloves for barriers. B. An observation on 6/12/24 at 8:35 AM revealed (Nursing Assistant) NA-D and NA-E completed handwashing and set up of supplies upon entering the room. It is noted that Resident 215 had a (Enhanced Barrier Protection) EBP sign on the door. Further observation revealed NA-D and NA_E completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12.006.09 Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions for pain management for 2 residents (Resident #4 and Resident #8) of 8 residents sampled. The facility census was 55. Findings are: A. Record review of a undated demographic sheet revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for Multiple Sclerosis. Resident #4's other diagnoses included: generalized anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, chronic pain and Temporomandibular Joint Disorder (TMJ). Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment used for care planning) dated 11/11/22 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11. According to the MDS [NAME] a score of 8 to 12 indicated a person has moderately impaired cognition. Record review of Resident #4's Care Plan revealed the resident has chronic pain related to Multiple Sclerosis and Temporomandibular joint disorder (TMJ). Resident 4 had the following interventions: -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number: 175 NAC 12-006.17D Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility staff failed to utilize handwashing and gloving techniques to prevent the potential for cross contamination for Resident #5 and while handling linen for Resident #6. The sample size was 8 and the facility identified a census of 55. Findings are: A. Observation on 10/26/23 at 4:23 AM revealed Nursing Assistant (NA)-B entered Resident #5's room, placed gloves on and did not complete hand hygiene. NA-B then assisted Resident 5 to the wheelchair and then to the bathroom. Resident 5 was observed to be incontinent of urine. NA-B changed gloves after the soiled brief was removed and did not performing hand hygiene. NA-B then cleaned up a liquid substance from the floor and then grabbed a clean brief with the contaminated gloves. NA-B then disposed of the gloves and placed another pair on without performing hand hygiene. NA-B assisted Resident 5 with placement of the new brief. NA-B collected trash and continued to the hallway with contaminated gloves on. A interview on 10/26/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-03 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC12-006.04D2 Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure there was a qualified Dietary Manager (DM). This had the potential to affect 59 of 62 residents in the building. The facility staff identified a census of 62. Findings are: Record review of the facility's Job description states The individual must be a Certified Dietary Manager, Certified Food Service Manager or has a similar national certification from a national certifying body for food service management and safety. On 5/2/23 at 11:50 AM an interview was conducted with the Administrator (ADM). During the interview the ADM revealed the Dietary Manager had not started the classes for certification or completed a program for Dietary Management.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-03 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(15) Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure full visual privacy in 11 (resident rooms 103, 104, 105, 206, 207, 209, 224, 228, 229, 237, 238) of 20 dual occupancy rooms as evidenced by no privacy curtains present that would surround the bed near the doorway to ensure visual privacy from the doorway or the resident's roommate. The facility census was 62. Findings are: Record review of a facility Policy and Procedure entitled Dignity and Respect and dated April 2021 revealed the following: 1. Residents shall be appropriately dressed in clean clothes arranged comfortably on their persons. 2. Residents shall be examined and treated in a manner that maintains the privacy of their bodies. A closed door or drawn curtain shields the resident from people that passed by the room. Observation on 04/30/23 at 6:51 AM revealed that upon opening the door to the room, staff were in the room providing care to Resident 11 and exposed skin was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006-15 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that resident rooms were home like with personal items in use in 5 (resident rooms 129, 130, 132, 136, 140) of 17 occupied resident rooms on the 1st floor of the facility. The facility census was 62. Findings are: Observation on 05/02/23 between 2:30 PM to 02:44 PM with the facility Administrator revealed that resident rooms 129, 130, 132, 136, and 140 were not home like and did not contain personal items or pictures to make the rooms feel home like and to provide visual stimulation to the residents that resided in those rooms. Interview on 05/02/23 at 02:50 PM with the Administrator confirmed that resident rooms 129, 130, 132, 136, and 140 did not appear home like and did not have any personal items or pictures present. Interview on 05/02/23 at 03:04 PM with the facility Social Services Worker confirmed that resident rooms 129, 130, 132, 136, and 140 were not home like and confirmed that the facility had not attempted to provide a home like environment by getting pictures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-03 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09B2 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS, a required comprehensive assessment of the resident used to create an individualized comprehensive care plan) assessments were completed within the required 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD, the last day of the observation period that the assessment covered for that resident) for 5 (Residents 26, 24, 43, 40 and 1) of 5 residents reviewed. The facility census was 62. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 26's Quarterly MDS revealed that the ARD was identified as 3/16/23. The MDS was completed on 4/18/23 and should have been completed on 3/30/23. The MDS was completed a total of 19 days late. B. Record review of Resident 24's Quarterly MDS revealed that the ARD was identified as 3/16/23. The MDS was completed on 4/19/23 and should have been completed on 3/30/23. The MDS was completed 20 days late. C. Record review of Resident 43's Quarterly MDS revealed that the ARD was identified as 3/22/23. The MDS was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-03 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.02 Based on observations, record review, and interviews; the facility administration staff failed to ensure effective management of facility resources to maintain the highest practical wellbeing of residents and the facility environment as evidenced by failure to implement an effective plan of action to maintain correction for previously cited areas of deficient practice and failure to ensure the facility identified and developed plans of action to identify multiple issues of deficient practice. The facility staff identified a census was 62. Findings are: Review of the facility during the current survey revealed the following deficiencies: -F550. The facility failed to ensure resident dignity was maintained for 2 of 3 residents. -F583. The facility failed to ensure full privacy in 11 of 20 dual occupancy rooms. -F584. The facility failed to ensure that rooms appeared homelike in 5 of 17 rooms. -F609. The facility failed to report an elopement for 1 resident in the required time frame. -F623. The facility failed to ensure the resident and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-03 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.07C Based on record review and staff interviews; the facility Quality Assessment Performance Improvement Plan (QAPIP) failed to identify ongoing issues relevant to F550, F580, F609, F657, F676, F689, F712, F730, F755, F758, F761, F812, F835 and F867 and implement plans of action to identify and correct the deficient practice. The QAPI failed to ensure repeated deficiencies at F692 and F697 were corrected and the correction maintained. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. The facility staff identified a census of 92. Findings are: Record review of a undated facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program revealed the following information: -Goal: -1. Implement a QAPI program that involves all staff and focuses on benchmarks to ensure quality of care and quality of life. -3. Continued improvement of management of risk including but not limited to preventative interventions to reduce adverse outcomes. On 5-02-2023 at 2:00 PM an interview with Nursing Assistant (NA) K…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(21) Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure that resident's dignity was maintained for 2 (Resident 40 and 24) of 3 residents reviewed as evidenced by exposure of an incontinence brief and tube feeding bottles in visual sight in a common area of the facility for Resident 40 and the use of a sign on Resident 24's door that described personal hygiene care needs. The sign was in sight of visitors and other residents that passed by the room. The facility census was 62. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 40's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a mandatory comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 3/23/23 identified that Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA, stroke), Aphasia (the inability to speak or comprehend) and Traumatic Brain Injury. The MDS identified that Resident 40 was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive to total…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12.006-02(8) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to report an elopement for 1 (Resident 50) of 1 sampled resident to the required state agency within the required time frame of 2 hours. The facility staff identified a census of 62. The findings are: Record review of Resident 50's Incident of Elopement dated 3/27/23 revealed the following: On 3/27/23 at 9:20 AM the facility door alarm sounded. Staff initiated response and went to exit doors. The administrator exited the building and noted Resident 50 outside in the parking lot stepping off the driveway. Resident was redirected and escorted back into the building. Record review of the facility report dated 3/30/23 revealed the required state agency was notified on 3/28/23 at 9:09 AM. Record review of the facility Elopement Policy and Procedure revised on 2/2022 revealed the following: -In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility will: ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(5) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident and /or the resident's representative were notified in writing of the reason for transfer to the hospital for 1 (Resident 66) of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 63. Findings are: Record review of Resident 66's Clinical Progress Notes dated 2/3/23 revealed that Resident 66 was sent to the hospital directly from an offsite Urology appointment. Record review of Resident 66's Electronic Medical Record revealed no documentation related to a written notice of the reason for transfer to the hospital provided to the resident and / or resident's representative for the hospitalization on 2/3/23. An interview on 5/2/23 at 1:00 PM with the facility Social Services Worker confirmed that no written notice of transfer to the hospital on 2/3/23 had been provided to Resident 66 or the resident's representative.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a new PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review, a screening to determine the presence of a mental illness or intellectual disability) review had been completed after a diagnosis of a mental disorder was identified for 1 (Resident 19) out of 1 reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 62. Findings are: Record review of Resident 19's Face Sheet identified that Resident 19 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included Anxiety Disorder, identified on 3/30/22, and Unspecified Dementia with other Behavioral Disturbance identified on 10/1/22. Review of Resident 19's admission Level 1 PASARR completed on 4/13/15 revealed that there was no evidence to suggest mental illness and no further screening was required unless the individual was suspected or found to have a mental illness condition. Record review of Resident 19's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, a mandatory comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 5/6/22, section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    LICENSE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12.006.09D2 Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure geri sleeves (a protective covering for arms) were in place as ordered for 1 (Resident 43) of 2 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 62. The findings are: Record review of Resident 43's current physician orders revealed an order dated 4/27/23 for geri sleeves to elbows every shift. Record review ofa progress note for Resident 43 dated 4/9/23 revealed the resident should wear sleeves at all times in room and out of room per Hospice nurse three times a day. Observation on 04/30/23 at 11:30 AM revealed Resident 43 did not have geri sleeves on (gender) arms. Observation on 05/01/23 at 7:52 AM revealed Resident 43 did not have geri sleeves on (gender) arms. Observationn on 5/2/23 at 8:49 AM revealed Resident 43 was up in wheelchair and did not have geri sleeves on bilateral arms. Bruising noted to left arm. An interview with the DNS (Director of Nursing Services) on 5/2/23 at 9:35 AM confirmed the order for geri sleeves from Hospice. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17B Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to apply personal protective equipment and perform hand hygiene and glove changes in a manner to prevent cross contamination for 1 (Resident 64) of 11 residents observed for personal care and wound cares. The facility census was 62. Findings are: Record review of an undated facility Policy and Procedure entitled Hand Hygiene identified the following policies: 3. Wash hands with soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the following situations: b. Before and after direct contact with residents. e. Before and after handling an invasive device (tube feeding would fall under this). g. Before handling clean or soiled dressing, gauze pads etc. h. Before moving from contaminated body site to a clean body site during resident care. i. After contact with residents' intact skin. Record review of Resident 64's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment used to develop a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-10-31 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — widespread
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(A)(iii) Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to complete background and registry checks for 2 of 5 employee file reviewed. The facility staff identified a census of 63. Findings are: A. Record review of Housekeeping Staff A's employee file revealed a hire date of 8-27-2024. Further review of Housekeeping A's employee file revealed there was no indications a Nurse Aid registry check had been completed. B. Record review of Housekeeping Staff B's employee file revealed a hire date of 8-14-2024. Further review of Housekeeping B's employee file revealed a Adult/Child Protection Services background checks had been completed. On 10-31-2024 at 10:07 AM an interview was conducted with the facility Administrator. During the interview, the facility Administrator confirmed the required background checks had not been completed for Housekeeping Staff A and B. Record review of the facility policy titled Abuse:Prevention of and Prohibition against revised on 10-2022 revealed the following information: -Screening: -Prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$39,146 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $39,146 — penalty dated 2025-07-10
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-08-28 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.2-2.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA 1 of 5St. Joseph's Rehabilitation and Care CenterNorfolk, NE

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SATTAR, ARIFIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
WILLIAMS, DOUGLASIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/03/2017
JORGENSEN, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/19/2013
HELENTHAL, TARAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/09/2024
SATO, AMIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/09/2024
KARE TECHNOLOGIES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2013
ONSHIFT INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2013
PORT, BARRYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
49TH STREET HEALTH HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2013
CARETRUST GP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2013
CARETRUST REIT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2013
CTR PARTNERSHIP LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2013
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2013

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$692K
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 8%Other / private 18%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $692K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$323per resident / day
operating cost
$9,819per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$342per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nebraska
$8,377/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,350/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285240. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next