No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

603 Corinne St, San Antonio, TX 78218 · Government - Hospital district · 120 certified beds · (210) 824-7331 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 20251 immediate-jeopardy citation$15,616 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,616 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-19)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3320 Oakwell Ct · (855) 962-3621 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1520 Austin Hwy · (210) 828-6871 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3515 Sunbelt Dr N · (210) 828-0161 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1701 Austin Hwy · (210) 828-2811 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.8%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.3%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.3%2.4%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.1%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.8%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.6%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.5%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.5%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.3%88.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.2%25.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.0%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.102.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.032.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.79U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.29hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.34hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 104 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.79 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.0%CMS range 29.1–51.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 7.4–16.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge57.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge64.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified89.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.4–12.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.111.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.58
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.00
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.54
RN hoursweekends
41.8%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 100.2 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-21)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, residents received treatment and care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7 received care and services according to professional standards when Resident #7, who was on blood thinners, fell before noon on [DATE] and received orders for monitoring and neuro checks. The last neuro check was completed at 2:45 a.m. on [DATE]. Resident #7 was last seen at 4:30 a.m. on [DATE]. Resident #7 was found unresponsive at approximately 7:20 a.m., with EMS services activated at 7:28 a.m. on [DATE] and she expired. This failure resulted in the identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE] at 4:14 p.m. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:24 p.m. While the IJ was removed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-03-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and does not develop pressure ulcers for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for monitoring of applied knee immobilizers. The facility failed to develop and implement supports and monitoring systems for Resident #1's need for a right knee immobilizer, and the resident developed skin breakdown underneath the knee immobilizer. This failure could place residents at risk for injuries from unmonitored orthotic devices. The findings include:A record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 3/18/2026, revealed an admission date of 2/2/2026 with a diagnosis of aftercare for orthopedic encounter. A record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care with ADL supports with a fragile right knee capable of dislocation and supported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet residents' medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment and to ensure the comprehensive care plan described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 13 residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident #1 had wandering behaviors.2. The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident #2 had a diagnosis of other stimulant abuse.3. The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident #3 had a diagnosis of alcohol dependence. These failures could place residents at risk of not having their needs met and not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment, for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for a care plan. The facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for Resident #1's physician prescribed right knee immobilizer. This failure could place residents at risk of not having care instructions for orthopedic appliances. The findings include:A record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 3/18/2026, revealed an admission date of 2/2/2026 with a diagnosis of aftercare for orthopedic encounter. A record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care with ADL supports with a fragile…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accurate records. Resident #1's medical records contained skin assessments which documented Resident #1 had no knee immobilizer. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate medical records. The findings include:A record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 3/18/2026, revealed an admission date of 2/2/2026 with a diagnosis of aftercare for orthopedic encounter. A record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care with ADL supports with a fragile right knee capable of dislocation and supported with an immobilizer. Resident #1 was assessed with a BIMS score of 13 out of a possible of 15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. A record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect or exploitation were reported no later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury to the State Survey Agency for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #1 and #2), reviewed for freedom from abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency (HHSC) an incident that occurred on 12/27/25-12/28/2025 in which Resident #1 received a package delivery intended for Resident #2 that contained multiple baggies of a crystal-like substance suspected to be narcotics. This failure could place residents at risk for neglect and could lead to a diminished quality of life and physical harm. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 1/16/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: legal blindness as defined in USA, type 2 diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records were maintained on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to document Resident #7's verbal aggression and room change, time or location of fall, monitoring and neuro check orders from physician, or pain and skin/injury assessment on 10/02/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services needed due to inaccurate or incomplete clinical records. The findings included:Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 10/13/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (stroke affecting the right side), gout (a type of arthritis affecting one or more joints with sudden attacks of severe pain and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from abuse for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was free from verbal abuse when LVN-H said to the resident Shut up on 04/04/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of feelings of indignity, irritability, and sadness. The noncompliance was identified as PNC (Past Non-Compliance). The noncompliance began on 04/04/2025 and ended on 04/05/2025. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 08/21/2025, revealed the resident was [AGE] years old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of encephalopathy (any brain disease that alters brain function), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition where the body has trouble regulating blood sugar levels, leading to persistently high blood glucose levels),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's nursing needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 3 Residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2 reviewed for mechanical lift transfers. MDS Coordinator, LVN C failed to identify that Resident #1 and Resident #2 were transferred via mechanical lift on their Care Plan. This deficient practice could affect any resident and could result in staff not providing the required services during transfers. The findings were: 1.Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 8/21/25, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (characterized by shortness of breath, cough and sputum production) with (Acute) Exacerbation (sudden worsening) and Morbid (severe) morbid obesity. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure it provided assistive devices to each resident to prevent avoidable accidents for 1 of 2 Residents (Resident #1) who were observed for mechanical lift transfers. CNA A and CNA B failed to use proper technique when transferring Resident #1 from the wheelchair to the bed on 8/20/25. CNA B walked away from Resident #1 while in mid-air, swinging side to side and while CNA A was attempting to position the mechanical lift under Resident #1's bed. CNA A continued to maneuver the mechanical lift on her own without CNA B's assistance as required according to facility policy. This deficient practice could affect residents who were transferred via mechanical lift, result in avoidable accidents and contribute to serious bodily injuries and possible death. The findiings were: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 8/21/25, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for one (Resident #4) out of seven residents reviewed for documentations. The facility failed to document wound care dressing changes on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident #4 on 08/15/2025, 08/16/2025, and 08/17/2025. These failures placed residents at risk for missed treatments and care which could result in the wound deterioration, and development of infection.Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 08/21/2025, revealed the resident was [AGE] years old male and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of surgical after care following surgery, muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of skeletal muscle mass), depression (lowering of a person's mood), old myocardial infarction (blockage of blood flow to the heart muscle), and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #4's admission MDS assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 3 nurse medication carts and 2 of 24 residents (Resident #89 and Resident #66) reviewed for storage of drugs and biologicals. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #89 did not have medications at the bedside when a large bottle of antacids was found at the resident's bedside. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #66 did not have medications at the bedside when a bottle of hemp gummies and a bottle of blood flow supplements were found at the resident's bedside. 3. The facility failed to ensure medication carts were locked and secured when LVN M left a medication unlocked and unsecured on 03/20/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of medication misuse or drug diversion. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #89's face sheet dated 3/19/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. The facility failed to date a bag of whipped cream in the fridge. 2. The facility failed to keep dry food delivery off the floor. 3. The facility failed to take and log temperatures for alternate items prior to meal service. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: 1. During an observation on 3/18/25 at 9:19 a.m. a bag of whipped nondairy cream was in the fridge. The bag had no date and was soft. The label read, best if used 1 year frozen (unopened) and 14 days refrigerated. During an interview on 3/18/25 at 9:19 a.m. the DS stated someone had just moved the whipped cream from the freezer box that day to use for meal service. The DS stated they should have dated it when they took it out of the box that had a date. 2. During an observation on 3/18/25 at 9:23 a.m. there was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #22, Resident #49, and Resident #147) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure PTA O wore a gown while in providing care to resident #22 who was on EBP. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA N performed hand hygiene and changed gloves during incontinent care on Resident #49. 3. The facility failed to ensure ADON B used appropriate infection control principles, including hand hygiene/glove changes during wound care. These failures could affect residents who required assistance with incontinent care and wound care treatments and could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infections. The finding included: 1. Record review of Resident #22's admission Record, dated 03/19/25, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be treated with respect and dignity, including the right to be free from any physical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #46 and Resident #49) observed for physical restraints in that: 1. The facility failed to obtain a consent for Resident #46 to wear a wander guard. 2. The facility failed to obtain a consent for Resident #49 to wear a wander guard. This failure placed residents at risk of unnecessary restriction of their freedom of movement and diminished quality of life. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #46's admission record, dated 3/20/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to formulate an advanced directive and determine the choice to receive or not receive CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) for 1 (Resident #22) of 8 residents reviewed for accuracy and completeness of clinical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22's OOH DNR was signed by 2 witnesses. This failure could affect any residents who have medical records and could result in misinformation about professional care provided. Findings included: Record review of Resident #22's admission Record, dated [DATE], revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social abilities, which interfere with daily life), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), pneumonitis (when air sacs in the lungs become inflamed due to irritant substances and disturb the normal functioning of the lungs),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 19 residents (Resident #91) reviewed for assessments: Resident #91's admission assessment MDS dated [DATE] did not accurately reflect the resident could not be rated for incontinence since the resident required an indwelling urinary catheter. This failure could place residents at risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments. The findings included: Record review of Resident #91's face sheet dated 3/20/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection, obstructive and reflux uropathy (condition in which the normal flow of urine is blocked leading to kidney damage; uropathy refers to kidney damage caused by backward flow of urine from the bladder into the ureters and kidney), and chronic kidney disease stage 3 (moderate decrease in kidney function). Record review of Resident #91's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify a diagnosis of mental illness on the preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) assessment for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #47 and Resident #90) whose records were reviewed for PASRR services. The facility failed to recognize on the Level I PASRR screening that Resident #47 and Resident #90 had the mental illness diagnosis of bipolar disorder which would qualify Resident #47 and Resident #90 for a PASRR evaluation. This deficient practice could place residents with mental illness at risk for not obtaining the services needed to treat their mental health diagnoses. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #47's admission sheet, dated 8/25/23, noted the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder on admission [DATE]). Record review of Resident #47's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 2/5/25, noted the resident's BIMS was 2, indicating severe cognitive impairment; mood indicators were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #89) reviewed for accidents and hazards: The facility failed to ensure Resident #89 did not have a pair of scissors, a large pair of nail clippers, and a disposable razor in his room. This failure could place residents at risk of harm or injury and contribute to avoidable accidents and a decline in health. The findings included: Record review of Resident #89's face sheet dated 3/19/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included gastro-esophageal reflux disease with esophagitis (a chronic condition where stomach acid frequently flows back into the esophagus causing inflammation and irritation), duodenitis without bleeding (inflammation of the first part of the small intestine without gastrointestinal bleeding), dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase (difficulty swallowing in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder and bowel received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #49 and Resident #91) reviewed for incontinent care: 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA I and CNA N properly cleaned Resident #31's vaginal area, catheter tube, and buttock area during incontinent care. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #91's indwelling urinary catheter bag was not on the floor. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infection and skin break down due to improper care practices. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #49's admission record, dated 3/20/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (happens when the body cannot use insulin correctly and sugar builds up in the blood), hydronephrosis (when urine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the resident's goals, and preferences for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for oxygen therapy: Resident #9's oxygen concentrator filters were covered in a thick white/gray substance. This failure could affect residents who received respiratory therapy and put them at risk for inadequate or inappropriate amounts of oxygen delivery. The findings included: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 3/20/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure (a condition in which the respiratory system fails to provide adequate oxygen to the blood or remove carbon dioxide from the body), dementia (decline in cognitive function…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for dialysis: The facility did not maintain communication, coordination, and collaboration with the dialysis facility for Resident #9. This deficient practice could affect residents who received dialysis treatments and place them at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 3/20/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (condition in which the kidneys have lost nearly all their function and can no longer effectively filter waste, excess fluids, and toxins from the blood, resulting in dialysis or a kidney transplant), cognitive communication deficit (refers to difficulty with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all alleged violation involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities, in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 6 residents (Resident#2) reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. The facility failed to report to the state survey agency an allegation of abuse reported by a family member of Resident #2. 2. The facility failed to report to the state survey agency an allegation of abuse when Resident #3 allegedly hit Resident #2. This failure could place residents at risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse involving Resident #2. This failure could place residents at risk of allegations of abuse causing mental, physical or emotional harm. The findings include: Record review of Resident #2's, undated, face sheet revealed Resident #2 was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included Encephalopathy (a disease in which the function or structure of the brain is affected, typically caused by infection, tumor or stroke), Dementia (a general term for impaired ability to remember, think or make decisions), Legal Blindness and Anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease, typically about an imminent event or something with an uncertain outcome). Record review of Resident #2's MDS Assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for resident assessments, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was coded on his Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], for a physical behavior that occurred on 06/12/2024. 2. Resident #2's Discharge MDS , dated 06/30/2024, was inaccurately coded as discharged to Home/Community instead of to Hospital. These failures could place residents at risk of improper or incorrect care and services necessary for their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 08/07/2024, reflected Resident #1 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. He was [AGE] years old. Record review of Resident #1's Medical Diagnoses from the resident's electronic medical record, accessed 08/07/2024, reflected Resident #1 had diagnoses of chronic systolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete an assessment which accurately reflected the resident's status for 4 of 24 residents (Residents #8, #32, and #33) reviewed for resident assessments, in that: 1. The facility failed to complete a BIMS for Resident #8 prior to the submission of the resident's quarterly MDS. 2. The facility failed to complete a BIMS for Resident #32 prior to the submission of the resident's quarterly MDS. 3. The facility failed to complete a BIMS for Resident #33 prior to the submission of the resident's quarterly MDS. These failures could result in inadequate care due to an incomplete assessment of the residents' mental status. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 2/16/2024, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Dementia (a term used to describe a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), muscle wasting and atrophy (wasting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #388, #9 and #65) reviewed for dialysis, in that: The facility did not maintain communication, coordination, and collaboration with the dialysis facility for Residents #388, #9 and #35. This deficient practice could affect residents who received dialysis treatments and place them at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #388's face sheet, dated 2/14/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dependence on renal dialysis (process of removing excess water, solutes and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally), type 2 diabetes (a chronic, long-lasting health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 60% based on 15 out of 25 opportunities, which involved 8 of 13 Residents (Residents #14, #24, #27, #36, #38, #56, #57, and #99) reviewed for medication administration, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN B administered 8 medications within acceptable parameters for safe medication administration for Residents #14, #24, #36 #38, #56 #99 and #57. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN C administered Resident #27's medications via PEG tube according to physician orders. 3. The facilty failed to ensure LVN C administered the correct medication to Resident #27 when LVN C administered a capsule of amantadine with out physician orders. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of their medications and could contribute to possible adverse reactions. The findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. There was plastic storage container of food thickener in the dry storage room that was not properly sealed. 2. There was a clear plastic bag with pieces of raw bacon in the reach in cooler that was not sealed, labeled or dated. 3. There was a box containing individual portions of roll dough in the walk in freezer that was open and the bag inside the box was open. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: 1. Observation on 02/13/2024 at 10:14 AM in the dry storage room revealed a white 10-gallon food storage container on a rack. The lid on the storage container was labeled Thickener 1/19/24 and was not properly sealed onto the container, exposing the contents to the ambient air in the dry storage room and potential contamination by pathogens, bacteria and pests. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infections for 3 of 5 staff (LVN B, LVN C, and CNA G) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA G sanitized the blood pressure cuff between Resident #81, #83, #100, and #101. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN B did not enter Resident #9's room without the proper PPE for droplet precautions. 3. The facility failed to ensure LVN C did not touch Resident #27's medication with his bare hands during administation. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infections. The findings included: 1. During an observation on 02/13/23 at 3:21 p.m. CNA G checked blood pressures using one wrist blood pressure cuff for residents on the C hallway. CNA G checked Residents #81, #83, #100, and #101 blood pressure and did not sanitize…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respect the residents' right to confidentiality in his or her personal and medical records for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #80) reviewed for residents' rights, in that: The facility failed to ensure LVN C locked Medication Cart Hall D/E Computer and left Resident #80's information exposed. This failure could place residents at risk of resident-identifiable information being accessed by unauthorized persons. Findings included: Record review of Resident #80's face sheet, dated 02/16/2024, revealed the resident was admitted to the facilty on 01/16/2024 with diagnoses that included: Spina Bifida Unspecified, Paraplegia Unspecified, Sepsis Unspecified Organism, Tinea Pedis, and Anemia Unspecified. Observation on 02/15/2024 at 3:15 p.m. revealed a computer on LVN C's medication cart (Medication Cart Hall D/E Computer) in front the medication storage room and nurses' station was left unlocked and unattended with Resident #80's health information exposed for approximately one minute while LVN C went to open his office…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter care, in that: Resident #1's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag was on the floor. This failure could place the residents with indwelling urinary catheter devices at risk for the development of new or worsening urinary tract infections. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 2/14/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage (damage to the brain due to lack of oxygen supply), dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities) with behavioral disturbance and agitation, and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident #1's most…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional standard for 2 of 13 residents (Resident #24 and Resident #81) reviewed for storage of drugs. 1. The facility failed to prevent an unlabeled IV bag of normal saline hanging on an IV pole in Resident #81's room. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN B administered an insulin that had been open 41 days prior, 13 days past the expiration date, to Resident #24. 3. The facility failed to ensure LVN C did not leave a medicine cup containing 2 tablets of acetaminophen unsecured and unattended on top of the nurse medication cart. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of medication not meeting therapeutic levels, misuse and diversion. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #81's face sheet, dated 02/16/24, revealed Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of nondisplaced fracture of greater trochanter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish policies, in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations, regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety that also take into account nonsmoking residents for 1 of 1 non-designated smoking areas, in that: The facility failed to ensure there was a self-closing ash tray, fire blanket, or sign designating an area a smoking area. This deficient practice could result in harm to residents and staff due to improperly discarded and used cigarette butts if policies were not followed. The findings were: Observation on 02/14/2024 at 2:20 PM revealed Dietary Aide D sitting on top of a red metal trash can adjacent to the left wall of the facility. Further observation revealed there was no self-closing ash tray, fire blanket, or sign designating the area a smoking area. During an interview with Dietary Aide D on 02/14/2023 at 2:21 PM, Dietary Aide D revealed he was told by the Maintenance Supervisor that was the staff designated smoking area. Dietary Aide D acknowledged there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation to ensure safe and orderly discharge from the facility for one resident (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility failed to assure all the resident's medications were reviewed and provided when Resident #1 discharged home. This failure could place residents at risk of being discharged without preparation, causing a disruption in their care and place the residents at risk for anxiety or depression. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 01/24/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE], re-admitted on [DATE], and discharged on 01/10/2024 with diagnosis that included: cerebral palsy (a disorder that affects a person's ability to move and maintain balance and posture), diabetes mellitus (a condition that develops with the way the body regulates and uses sugar as fuel), and atherosclerotic heart disease (a buildup of fats in the arterial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents had the right to be free from abuse for 1 of 5 (Resident #6) residents reviewed for abuse, in that: Resident #6 was involved in an altercation on 02/20/2023 in which CNA F verbally abused, shouted in a threatening manner, and spoke offensive language to Resident #6. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The non-compliance began on 02/20/2023 and ended on 02/22/2023. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the investigation began. This failure could affect the residents at the facility and place them at risk for physical, verbal, and/or psychosocial harm. The findings included: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 12/05/2023 revealed an admission date of 12/17/2021 and a discharge date of 03/07/2023 and diagnoses which included: acute chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, other recurrent depressive disorders, and cognitive communication deficit. Record review of Resident #6's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to incorporate recommendations from a PASRR evaluation report into a resident assessment, care planning, and transition of care for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #7) reviewed for PASRR services, in that: The facility failed to submit a NFSS authorization request for PASRR specialized services (therapies and assessments OT and PT) through the TMHP Long Term Care (LTC) Portal for Resident #7 in the required timeframe. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving specialized PASRR services which could contribute to a decline in physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 12/06/2023 indicated Resident #7 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia (a chronic degenerative disorder of the central nervous system that affects both the motor system and non-motor systems with involuntary, erratic,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed staff were able to demonstrate the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for resident's needs for 1 of 5 licensed staff (LVN A) reviewed for nursing competencies. The facility failed to ensure LVN A followed the physician's orders to test (Resident # 3) for COVID-19[Corona Virus Disease] not (resident # 2 ). This failure had the potential to affect residents by placing them at an increased and unnecessary risk of exposure to staff who lack the appropriate skills and competencies to provide care that was safe and capable of minimizing accidents from procedural errors and errors in medication administration. Findings included: 1. Record Review of Resident's # 2 face sheet dated 12/06/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis that included: [ Cerebral palsy]: is a group of disorders that affect a person's ability to move and maintain balance and posture. [Type 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two residents of 5 residents (Residents #2 and #3) observed for infection control, in that: LVN A failed to identify resident # 2 prior to conducting COVID-19 test [Corona Virus Disease] , leading to incorrect results reported and delay in treatment for Resident # 3 . This deficient practice could potentially affect Residents in the facility by placing them at risk of contracting, spreading, and/or exposing them to pathogens that could lead to the spread of communicable diseases. The findings included: 1 Record Review of Resident's # 2 face sheet dated 12/06/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis that included: [ Cerebral palsy]: a group of disorders that affect a person's ability…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 3 residents (R#1), reviewed for care plan development. R#1 had a seizure on 07/12/23 requiring a hospitalization for three days and the care plan was not revised to reflect a goal and interventions for seizures. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for lack of coordination of services and continuity of care. The findings were: Record review of R#1's face sheet, dated 11/08/23 and EMR reflected, the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged to hospital on [DATE]; and re-admitted [DATE] and discharged [DATE] with diagnoses which included: seizures, [NAME] disease (overproduction of hormones) and lupus (inflammatory disease) . Resident was a female; age [AGE]. RP was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #137) reviewed for advance directives, in that: Resident #137's OOH-DNR form was incorrectly executed and was therefore invalid. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of having their wishes regarding advance directives unknown or not honored. The findings were: Record review of Resident #137's face sheet, dated 12/09/2022, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Vascular Dementia, Cerebrovascular Disease, and Aphasia Following Unspecified Cerebrovascular Disease. Further review of Resident #137's facesheet revealed the names and contact information for two of the resident's family members. Record review of Resident #137's facility clinical record revealed an MDS assessment had not yet been completed for the resident due to his recent admission. Record review of Resident #137's BIMS assessment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 2 resident (Resident #23) reviewed for incontinent care, in that: While providing incontinent care for Resident #23, CNA B used a back to front motion to clean Resident #23's buttocks. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection and skin break down due to improper care practices. The findings were: Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 12/08/2022, revealed an admission date of 03/03/2022 and, a readmission date of 09/28/2022, with diagnoses which included: Urinary tract infection (09/28/2022), Diabetes mellitus (persistently high levels of sugar (glucose) in the blood), Hydronephrosis (urine collects in the kidneys because it is unable to flow to the bladder), Hypertension (High blood pressure), Irritable bowel syndrome…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below 5% for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #8) and 1 of 1 staff LVN C reviewed for medication administration errors, in that LVN C administered late medications to Resident #8 resulting in an 8% medication administration error rate. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions. The findings included: Record review of Resident #8's face sheet, dated 12/08/2022, revealed an admission date of 07/02/2022, with diagnoses which included: Dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), Hypothyroidism (Decrease production of thyroid hormone), Hyperlipidemia (Elevated level of lipids (fat)), Depression (Mental state of low mood or aversion to activity), Hypertension(High blood pressure), chronic kidney disease(Gradual loss of kidney function) A record review of Resident #8's Medication administration schedule/MAR, for December 2022, revealed, Levothyroxine Sodium Tablet 100 MCG Give 1 tablet by mouth in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were medical records for each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #75) reviewed for medical records, in that: Resident #75's face sheet indicated DNR or do not resuscitate, and the resident's care plan indicated full code or do resuscitate. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records were maintained by the facility and place them at risk for errors in care and treatment. The findings were: Record review of Resident #75's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: End Stage Renal Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Unspecified Complications, and Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease. Further review of Resident #75's face sheet revealed Advance Directive: Status: DNR - Do Not Resuscitate. Record review of Resident #75's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 12, which indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for infection control, in that: While providing incontinent care for Resident #8 CNA B did not wash or sanitize her hands between change of gloves, before touching the resident's briefs and after cleaning the resident's buttocks' area. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings include: Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 12/08/2022, revealed an admission date of 03/03/2022 and, a readmission date of 09/28/2022, with diagnoses which included: Urinary tract infection (09/28/2022), Diabetes mellitus (persistently high levels of sugar (glucose) in the blood), Hydronephrosis (urine collects in the kidneys…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-08-09 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post daily information that included the facility name, current date, total number and actual hours worked by registered nurses, licensed practical or licensed vocational nurses, certified nurse aides directly responsible for resident care per shift and the resident census for 6 days (07/31/2024 to 08/05/2024). The facility did not post the required current nurse staffing information from 07/31/2024 to 08/05/2024. This failure could place all residents, their families, and facility visitors at risk of not having access to information regarding staffing data and the facility census. Findings included: Observation on 08/06/2024 at 09:23 a.m., revealed a document labeled [facility name] DAILY NURSING CARE HOURS dated 07/30/2024, was posted on a wall across from the nurses' station. During an observation and interview on 08/06/2024 at 09:23 a.m., ADON A confirmed the posted nurse staffing document was dated 07/30/2024. ADON A stated the staffing coordinator (SC) was responsible for posting the daily census and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,616 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $1,547 — penalty dated 2026-03-19
  • $14,069 — penalty dated 2025-10-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.2-2.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA 1 of 5St. Joseph's Rehabilitation and Care CenterNorfolk, NE

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GUADALUPE COUNTY HOSPITAL BOARDOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2022
BRADY, HEATHERIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2022
GANN, KODYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/03/2021
SALADO CREEK SENIOR CARE INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2022
BURNAM, SOONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$941K
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 18%Other / private 17%

This home reported $941K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$312per resident / day
operating cost
$9,481per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$350per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455754. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next