Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care Center
1220 Montana Street, Gooding, ID 83330 · For profit - Corporation · 80 certified beds · (208) 934-5601 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $16,350 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-30)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.7% | 15.6% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.4% | 5.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.2% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.0% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 28.9% | 15.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.5% | 16.1% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.0% | 16.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.5% | 96.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.8% | 3.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.6% | 22.1% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.7% | 20.1% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.8% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.6% | 86.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 13.3% | 17.7% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.8% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.18 | 1.17 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.48 | 1.66 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.4%CMS range 35.5–60.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 6.4–15.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 76.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.1%CMS range 2.4–13.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.28 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 53.9 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.73 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the State Agency's Long-Term Care Reporting Portal, staff interviews, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for transportation. This failure caused injury for this resident. Findings include:The facility's Transportation Policy/Procedure policy revision date 12/30/25, documented Loading Passengers - insert the four tie down mechanisms to the fixture on the floor. Make certain that they are secured, and locked in. The facility's Fleet Safety Program manual revision date 4/14/21, documented employees are expected to operate vehicles safely to prevent accidents which may result in injuries and property loss. Resident #8 was initially admitted to the facility 11/21/25, and readmitted [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dependence on renal dialysis and diabetes. On 4/28/26 at 3:00 PM, reviewed the facility's investigation. Based on the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a clean, safe, homelike environment. This was true for all residents who resided in the facility whose environment were observed. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents were embarrassed by and/or felt the disrepair in the facility was unacceptable, disrespectful, or undignified or residents were injured due to unsafe areas in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Safe, Homelike Environment policy, dated October 2007, documented the facility would provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment.The following areas were observed:On 4/27/26 and 4/28/26 - observed South Hall shower with: - moderate amount of strands of black hair in the shower drain - broken tiles with jagged edged holes in shower stall tiles - cracks in multiple shower tiles - dark residue matter in the shower tile grout. - multiple small round holes in shower stall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to refer residents for further mental health evaluation when residents stayed beyond a 30 day exemption for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #7) and the facility failed to request a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for 2 of 3 residents (#10 and #38) reviewed for PASARR screenings. This failure created the potential for harm if residents required but did not receive specialized services for mental health while residing in the facility. Findings include:Resident #7 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including right femur fracture and schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thoughts, speech, and behavior).On [DATE] at 9:20 AM, Resident #7's Level II PASRR dated [DATE], documented a 30-day exemption rehabilitation, directing staff that if he stayed beyond 30 days, the facility must submit the most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for 2 of 2 Residents (#7 and #26) reviewed for quality of care. This failed practice had the potential to adversely affect or harm residents whose care and services were not delivered according to accepted standards of clinical practices. Findings include: Resident #7 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including right femur fracture and schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thoughts, speech, and behavior). On 4/28/26 at 2:49 PM, observed an albuterol and fluticasone inhaler in Resident #7's room on his bedside table. Resident #7 stated the nurses gave it to him and let him keep it in the room because they sometimes cannot make it down to his room quick enough. On 4/28/26 at 3:35 PM, Resident #7's medical record had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored, locked, and controlled medications were stored and kept secure from potential theft and/or diversion. This was true for 2 of 17 Residents (#18 and #26) and the facility. These deficient practices created the potential for adverse effects if residents self-administered medications inappropriately, undetected misuse of medications and/or diversion of controlled medications and had the potential to affect all residents who receive medication in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Self Administration of Medications policy, revision date 05/2023, documented; Procedures 2. If a resident desires to participate in self-administration, the interdisciplinary team will assess and periodically re-evaluate the resident based on change in the resident's status. 9. Appropriate notations of these determinations will be placed in the resident's care plan. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for residents' rights. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if the resident could not call for assistance when needed or experienced an adverse medical event that required attention. Findings include: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic kidney disease and chronic atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate). On 4/29/26 at 7:51 AM, observed Resident #45 lying in bed with his call light plugged into the wall and hanging down the wall and under the head of his bed and not within his reach. Resident #45 unable to independently reach call light. On 4/29/26 at 7:53 AM, RN #1 stated Resident #45's call light should be within reach and had not been. On 4/29/26 at 3:48 PM, the RCN stated residents' call light should have been within reach and had not been.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to refer residents for further evaluation when residents were diagnosed with a major mental illness, intellectual disability, or a related condition. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for Level II PASARR evaluations. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if resident's specialized services for mental health needs were not evaluated by an appropriate state-designated authority. Findings include: Resident #7 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including right femur fracture and schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thoughts, speech, and behavior).Resident #7's Level I PASRR dated 3/23/26 had not documented the schizophrenia disorder diagnosis with an onset date 3/21/22.On 4/30/26 at 8:45 AM, the DON stated the schizophrenia diagnosis for Resident #7 should have been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' care plans were developed or revised to reflect current needs and interventions. This was true for 2 of 6 residents (#10 and #38) whose care plans were reviewed. This placed residents at risk of adverse outcomes if care and services were not provided due to care plans not being developed or revised as residents' needs changed. Findings include:Resident #10 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (progressive lung disease characterized by increasing breathlessness) and Bipolar II disorder.On 4/27/26 at 1:56 PM, Resident #10's care plan dated 3/25/26 to 6/23/26, had the following interventions missing.- At risk for impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes. Date Initiated: 3/25/26- ADL Self Care Performance Deficit. Date Initiated: 3/25/26- At risk for falls r/t (SPECIFY) Date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory services as ordered by the physician. This was true for 2 of 5 residents (#7 and #9) whose records were reviewed for respiratory services. This failure created the potential for residents to experience increased fatigue and low oxygen levels. Findings include: Resident #7 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including right femur fracture and schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thoughts, speech, and behavior). On 4/27/26 at 11:25 AM, observed Resident #7's oxygen concentrator was set at 4 lpm, was turned on, and he was not using it during our visit. Resident #7 stated he only uses it at night or when he thinks he needs it during the day. Resident #7's physician oxygen order dated 3/23/26, documented oxygen continuously at 3 lpm via NC, every shift. On 4/29/26 at 4:39 PM, the DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review it was determined the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were tracked and kept secure from potential theft and/or diversion. This was true for 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed. This failure created the potential for undetected misuse and/or diversion of controlled medications and had the potential to affect all residents who received controlled medication in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Controlled Medications - Storage and Reconciliation policy, revision date 03.2025 documented. Procedure 8. A reconciliation or physical inventory of all controlled medications is conducted by two licensed nurses and is documented on an audit record at each shift change. On 4/29/26 at 7:59 AM, observed during the East Hall medication cart audit, the Narcotic Audit Shift Count sheets, with start date 2/14/26, and start date 4/1/26, with 1 licensed nurse signature not documented on 2/15/26 for 0600 count, on 2/15/26 for 1800 count, and on 4/6/26 for 0630 count. On 4/29/26 at 8:04 AM, LPN #3 stated two nurses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive resident-centered care plans. This was true for 6 of 17 residents (#3, #14, #16, #47, #52, and #108) whose care plans were reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk of negative outcomes if services were not provided or provided incorrectly due to lack of information in their care plan. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning policy, revised December 2023, documented the resident's care plan would include their needs and any specialized services. The following was observed for care plan review: 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility 2/13/25, with multiple diagnoses including respiratory failure and hypertension. Resident #3's Physician order dated 3/8/25, documented she was a full code. Resident #3's care plan did not document her code status. 2. Resident #14 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's rights to be free from abuse were protected. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #36) reviewed for abuse. This failure placed all residents at risk for ongoing abuse and potential physical and psychosocial harm. Findings include: The facility's Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against policy revision date December 2023, documented it was the policy of the facility that each resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriate of resident property, exploitation, and mistreatment. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the multiple diagnoses including dementia and cognitive communication deficit. A facility reported incident dated 12/20/24 documented the following: - CNA #3 heard CNA #2 verbally abusing Resident #36. - CNA #3 immediately told CNA #2 to leave Resident #36's room. - The Administrator was notified and CNA #2 was suspended pending…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, policy review, employee record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure policies were implemented to protect residents from potential physical and/or psychosocial harm. This was true for 1 of 6 facility staff (NA #1), whose personnel files were reviewed for pre-employment background checks. This had the potential to place each of the residents residing in the facility at increased risk for physical and/or psychosocial harm. Findings include: The State Operations Manual, Appendix PP revised 8/8/24, documented, a facility must have written procedures for screening potential employees for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property. The facility's Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against policy revised December 2023, documented prior to hire, the facility will screen potential employees for history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property. On 6/13/24, NA #1 was hired by the facility. On 3/19/25, a review of NA #1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the State Operations Manual-Appendix PP, the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's diagnosed medical condition was documented on the resident's comprehensive MDS assessment. This was true for 1 of 7 residents, (Resident #9) whose MDS assessments were reviewed. This failure created the potential for harm if care decisions were based upon inaccurate or lack of information. Findings include: The State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, revised 8/8/24, documented a facility must make a comprehensive assessment using the RAI specified by CMS and include active disease diagnoses and health conditions. The RAI, revised October 2024, documented diseases that have a documented diagnosis in the last 60 days and have a direct relationship to the resident's current functional status, cognitive status, mood or behavior status, medical treatments, nursing monitoring, or risk of death during the 7-day look-back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was accurate and posted daily for each shift. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility and their representatives, visitors, and others who wanted to review the facility's staffing levels. Findings include: The State Operation Manual, Appendix PP revised on 8/8/24, documented the facility must post the following information on a daily basis: (i) Facility name. (ii) The current date. (iii) The total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: (A) Registered nurses. (B) Licensed practical nurses or licensed vocational nurses (as defined under State law). (C) Certified nurse aides. (iv) Resident census. On 3/20/25 at 11:47 AM, a review of the posted nursing staff hours dated October 2024 - March 2025 was conducted with the following results. - On 10/18/24, the posted nurse staff hours was blank. - On 1/9/25, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications available for residents were labeled, dated, and stored appropriately, this was true for 2 of 2 medication carts audited for labeling and storage of medication. This failure created the potential for residents to have missed doses of medication. Findings include: On 3/19/25 at 8:05 AM, the East Hall medication cart was audited with CMA #1 present. Observed on the bottom of the third drawer; 1 oval shaped white tablet, 1 small round white tablet, 1 large oblong white tablet. On 3/19/25 at 8:13 AM, CMA #1 stated the pills should not have been loose in the medication cart. On 3/19/25 at 9:34 AM, the Skilled Hall medication cart was audited with LPN #1 present. Observed on the bottom of the third drawer; 2 small, round white pills. On 3/19/25 at 9:42 AM, LPN #1 stated the pills should not have been loose in the medication cart and should have been destroyed. On 3/19/25 at 2:20 PM, the DON stated the nurses or medication aides should have destroyed the loose pills.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the Idaho Food Code, the facility failed to appropriately store and label food products, and cover meal trays correctly. This failure had the potential to impact all residents in the facility. This placed residents at risk for use of spoiled foods, and potential contamination, and adverse health outcomes including food-borne illnesses. Findings include: The Idaho Food Code, revised February 2021, stated, 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking . held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded . 1. The following were related to labeling and storage of food products: On 3/17/25 at 9:51 AM, the following was observed in the dry food storage area, with the DS present: - Dry pasta, open date 10/9/24, should have been disposed on 3/9/25. - Barley dry food, use by date of 12/24. - Ragu pasta sauce use by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, homelike environment. This failure had the potential to impact all residents, by placing them at risk for injury and infections. Findings include: On 3/19/25 at 11:17 AM, observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] with CMA #1 present, the sharps container was filled past the full line. On 3/19/25 at 11:28 AM, CMA #1 stated the sharps container should have been changed when it was full. On 3/19/25 at 1:48 PM, observed with the DON present, overfilled sharps container with multiple used razors poking out of the opening, in the south hall shower room and fuzzy black mold-like substance on the shower tiles. On 3/19/25 at 1:53 PM, observed with the DON present, overfilled sharps container with multiple used razors poking out of the opening, in the north skilled hall shower room and fuzzy black mold-like substance by ceiling vent. On 3/19/25 at 3:18 PM, the Maintenance Supervisor stated he felt the black stuff on and next to the shower ceiling vent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-17 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the job description for the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure there was a qualified Dietary Manager with required competencies and skills. This had the potential to affect the meal/food satisfaction of all 52 residents residing in the facility who received food from the kitchen. Findings include: The Dietary Supervisor (Dietary Manager) Job Description provided by the facility documented the individual was responsible for directing the overall operation of the dietary department. The DM was to ensure that quality nutritional services were provided, and the dietary department was maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. Education and experience requirements include a minimum of two years' experience in a supervisory capacity in a hospital, skilled nursing care facility or other related medical facility. The Job Description stated if the DM was not a qualified Dietitian or Nutritional Professional, the individual must be a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), Certified Food Service Manager or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the dish machine was monitored adequately in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications for temperature and sanitizer concentration; sanitizing solutions for wiping kitchen surfaces and for pot washing were adequate in sanitizer concentration; and foods in the residents' refrigerator on the nursing unit were labeled and dated in the facility's kitchen. These deficiencies placed the 52 residents residing in the facility who received meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. Findings include: The facility provided the undated Idaho Food Code, [Chapter 4], Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Public Health when the request for their kitchen sanitation policy was made. Review of the Idaho Food Code stated under 4-501 Warewashing [process of cleaning and sanitizing kitchen items] Machines, Manufacturers' Operating Instructions, A warewashing machine [commercial dishwasher] and its auxiliary components shall be operated in accordance with the machine's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure waste was properly contained with lids or otherwise covered. This created the potential for insect and pest infestation of the facility's premises and had the potential to adversely affect all 52 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's Garbage and Rubbish Disposal policy, dated 10/2017, documented All garbage and rubbish containing food wastes shall be kept in containers . All containers shall be provided with tight fitting lids or covers and such containers must be kept covered when store or not in continuous use .Garbage and rubbish containing food wastes shall be stored so as to be inaccessible to vermin . Outside dumpsters provided by garbage pickup service must be kept closed . 1. During an observation on 5/13/24 at 11:25 AM, with the DM, there was a large dumpster that had two plastic lids, each covering half of the top of the dumpster. Both lids to the dumpster were open; the contents in the dumpster were exposed. There were no staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a safe, homelike environment. This was true for 2 of 3 shower rooms observed in the facility. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if: a) residents were injured due to unsafe areas in the facility and b) residents were embarrassed by and/or felt the disrepair in the facility was unacceptable, disrespectful, or undignified. Findings include: The facility's Safe, Homelike Environment policy, dated October 2007, documented the facility would provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The following areas were observed: - On 5/14/24 at 8:41 AM, the skilled hall shower room was observed with 8 missing floor tiles. The air vent on the ceiling had a dry, light gray substance, in the vent slats. The ceiling around the vent had a black substance around the vent. - On 5/14/24 at 8:46 AM, the skilled hall hallway, outside room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive resident-centered care plans. This was true for 4 of 13 residents (#17, #24, #31, and #198) whose care plans were reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk of negative outcomes if services were not provided or provided incorrectly due to lack of information in their care plan. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning policy, revised 12/2023, documented the facility interdisciplinary team will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident and will include residents' needs identified in the comprehensive assessment and any specialized services. 1. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including amputation of her left leg above knee and spina bifida (a birth defect in which a developing baby ' s spinal cord fails to develop properly). A quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were tracked and kept secure from potential theft and/or diversion. This was true for 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed. This failure created the potential for undetected misuse and/or diversion of controlled medications and had the potential to affect all residents who received controlled medication in the facility. Findings include: Controlled Medications are substances that have an accepted medical use (medications which fall under US Drug Enforcement Agency Schedules II-V), and have a potential for abuse, ranging from low to high, and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence. The facility's Controlled Medication - Storage and Reconciliation policy, revisied 12/2023, documented a reconciliation of all controlled medication is conducted by two licensed nurses and is documented on an audit record at each shift change. On 5/15/24 at 2:23 PM, during a medication cart audit, a narcotic accountability record was observed to have multiple blank…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. This was true for 3 of 45 medications (6.67%) which affected 2 of 6 residents (#17 and #24) whose medication administration was observed. This failed practice placed residents at risk of not receiving their prescribed medication or dosage of their medication. Findings include: The facility's Administration of Medication policy, revised 1/2022, documented prior to administering the resident's medication, the nurse or medication technician should compare the drug and dosage schedule on the resident's MAR with the drug label. 1. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including amputation of her left leg above the knee and spina bifida (a birth defect in which a developing baby ' s spinal cord fails to develop properly). A physician order, dated 5/14/24, documented to administer to Resident #17 normal saline flush solution (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, policy review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided nourishing, palatable, well-balanced meals that met their daily special dietary needs and specific preferences as documented on the residents' meal ticket. This was true for 5 of 14 residents (#2, #19, #25, #26, and #39) reviewed for food and nutrition services. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents experienced dissatisfaction, hunger and/or weight loss from not having complete meals served. Findings include: The facility's Food and Nutrition policy, dated 12/2023, documented, It is the policy of this facility to assure that menus are developed and prepared to meet the nutritional needs of the residents and resident choices . 'Reasonable effort' means assessing individual resident needs and preferences and demonstrating actions to meet those needs and preferences . a. The Resident Council meeting minutes, documented concerns with resident's meal selections as follows: - 8/11/24 meeting minutes -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, policy review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide nutritionally comparable and sufficient alternate meals to residents. This was true for 5 of 14 residents (#2, #14, #19, #25 and #39) reviewed for food preferences. This created the potential for dissatisfaction, and decreased meal intake. Findings include: The facility's Food and Nutrition Menus policy, dated 12/2023, documented Menu alternatives aligned with individual needs and preferences should be available if the primary menu or immediate selections for a particular meal are not to the resident's liking . a. The Resident Council meeting minutes from 7/14/23 - 3/13/24, documented concerns with the provisions of alternate menu as follows: - 7/14/23 meeting minutes: one resident expressed a concern about dietary alternates. - 10/12/23 meeting minutes: wants to change around alternatives. - 2/14/24 meeting minutes: a request for salads to be included on the alternate list. - 3/13/24 documented: Several dietary preferences: concerns and several…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure to respect and maintain residents' dignity. This was true for 8 of 8 residents (#20, #27, #35, #36, #40, #41, #45 and #99) reviewed for respect and dignity who required assistance with their meals. This deficient practice created the potential for psychosocial harm if residents experienced embarrassment or lack of self-esteem. Findings include: The facility's admission Packet included the Resident Rights which stated, You have the right to be with respect and dignity. On 5/13/24 at 11:01 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) stated lunch was served in the main dining room at 11:30 AM. The DM stated the feeders sitting at the horseshoe shaped table were served last. 1a. On 5/15/24 the following observations were made during breakfast in the dining room: - At 7:23 AM, four residents (Resident #35, Resident #45, Resident #40, and Resident #99) were brought into the dining room by staff and seated at the two horseshoe shaped tables in the dining room for residents who required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, review of facility grievances, and staff and resident interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure grievances were responded to and investigated, and prompt corrective action was taken to resolve them. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #37) reviewed for grievances. This failure created the potential for psychological harm if residents' grievances were not acted upon. Findings include: The facility's Grievances policy and procedure, revised December 2023, documented the Grievance Official would evaluate and investigate the concern and takes immediate action to resolve the concern and prevent further potential violations of any resident's rights while the alleged violation was being investigated. The policy also documented the Grievance Official or designee would respond to the individual expressing the concern within 3 working days of the initial concern to acknowledge receipt and describe steps taken toward resolution. Resident #37 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a seatbelt used for a resident was assessed as a potential restraint. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #29) reviewed for restraints. This deficient practice had the potential for adverse outcomes if the seatbelt was improperly used and if the resident experienced physical deterioration due to lack of movement. Findings include: The facility's Physical Restraint Assessment policy, revised 8/2007, defined physical restraint as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body, that the resident cannot remove easily, and restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body site. The policy also documented residents would not have restraints applied until the IDT had made and documented an accurate and thorough assessment of the need for the restraint. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review. and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure information was provided to the receiving hospital for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #9) reviewed for transfers. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if the resident was not treated in a timely manner due to lack of information. Findings include: The facility's Criteria for Transfer and Discharge policy and procedure, revised 12/2023 documented when the facility transferred or discharged a resident, the facility should ensure the transfer or discharge was documented in the resident's medical record and appropriate information was communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider. Information provided to the receiving provider must include a minimum of the following: - Contact information of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident. -Resident's representative information including contact information. -Advance Directive information - All special instructions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure transfer notices were provided to the ombudsman. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #9) reviewed for transfers to the hospital. This deficient practice had the potential for harm if residents were not aware of or able to exercise their rights related to transfers. Findings include: Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including depression, congestive heart failure (weakness of the heart leading to a buildup of fluid in the body) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A nursing note, dated 3/10/24 at 1:47 PM, documented the physician and Resident #9's representative were notified that she was in pain and her pulse rate was greater than 100 beats /minute. An order was received to continue her pain management and blood pressure. A nursing note, dated 3/11/24 at 6:13 PM, documented Resident #9's condition continued to decline and the provider was notified. Resident #9's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of nursing practice were followed for 3 of 13 residents (#31, #37, and #43) reviewed for quality of care. Resident # 31 was at risk of wound infection when his wound dressing was not dated. Resident #37 was at risk for adverse outcomes when his physician was not notified of Resident #37's refusal of medication. Resident #43 was at risk of adverse outcomes when his physician was not notified of hyperglycemic (low blood sugar) episodes. Findings include: The Lippincott Nursing Procedures textbook, dated 2018, section for Medication Administration - Dressing a Wound, documented dressings were to be labeled with the date, time, and initials. 1. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnosis including subdural hemorrhage (a pool of blood between the brain and its outermost covering) and Type 2 diabetes. A physician's order, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received oxygen therapy per physician's orders. This was true for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for oxygen therapy. This failure created the potential for Resident #16 to experience respiratory distress for not receiving the sufficient amount of oxygen to maintain oxygen levels. Findings include: The facility's Oxygen Administration policy, dated 9/2023, documented It is the policy of this facility that oxygen therapy is administered, as ordered by the physician . The purpose of the oxygen therapy is to provide sufficient oxygen via wall outlet or oxygen concentrator . Oxygen per MD [Medical Doctor]/NP [Nurse Practitioner] orders . Reassess oxygen flowmeter for correct liter flow . Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - progressive lung disease characterized by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications available for residents were labeled and had not expired. This was true for 2 of 2 medication storage rooms inspected. This failure created the potential for residents to receive medication used for another resident presenting a risk for cross-contamination or to receive expired medications with decreased efficacy. Findings include: 1. On 5/15/24 at 1:43 PM, during a medication cart audit of the Skilled Hall medication cart, a bottle of Top Care eye drops (Lubricating eye drops) with an expiration date of 3/2024, was observed. On 5/15/24, RN #1 stated the eye drops were expired and should have been removed from the medication cart. 2. On 5/15/24 at 2:33 PM, during a medication cart audit of the East Hall medication cart, the following was observed: - A package of Loperamide (anti-diarrheal) 2 mg, 34 capsules, with an expiration date of 2/23/23. - An Albuterol Sulfate inhaler (medication used to help relax…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for dialysis had an accurate medical record to include documentation of the dates she failed to attend dialysis. This deficient practice created the potential for her healthcare provider to be unaware of the extent of her non-compliance. Findings include: The facility's Content of Medical Record policy, dated 8/2020, stated All physicians, nursing staff and other health care professionals involved in the resident's care will be responsible for making prompt, appropriate entries in the record . Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis. A physician order, dated 8/8/23, documented Resident #6 had hemodialysis 3 times a week every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Resident #6's Dialysis Flow Sheets from 3/1/24 through 5/15/24, showed 12 Dialysis Flow Sheets were missing during this period, on 3/2/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control prevention practices were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment. These failures had the potential to impact all 52 residents residing in the facility by placing them at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings include: The facility's Standard and Transmission-Based Precautions policy, revised 4/2024, documented it was the policy of the facility to implement infection control measures to prevent the spread of communicable diseases and conditions. The policy further stated: - Enhanced Barrier Protection (EBP): used in conjunction with standard precautions and expand the use of PPE [personal protective equipment] through the use of gown and glove during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for indirect transfer of MDROs [Multidrug Resistant Organisms] to staff hands and clothing then indirectly transferred to residents or from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who were offered and consented to the pneumococcal vaccine, received the vaccine. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #17) whose records were reviewed for pneumococcal vaccinations. This failure created the potential for residents to have an increased risk of pneumococcal (bacterial) pneumonia and the potential for severe illness or death. Findings include: The facility's Immunization - Residents policy, revised 12/2023, documented each resident was offered the pneumococcal immunization based on current CDC guidelines, unless the immunization was medically contraindicated, or the resident had already been immunized. There were two types of Pneumococcal vaccines available for adults: Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV15 and PCV20) and Pneumococcal Polyssacharide Vaccine (PPSV23). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, dated 3/15/23, and accessed on 5/21/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$16,350 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $16,350 — penalty dated 2026-04-30
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.2 | -2.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALLEN, DANIEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| ORD, RICHARD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/09/2025 |
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 05/18/2018 |
| FARNSWORTH, STEPHEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 05/11/2018 |
| HAWKINS, ISAIAH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/09/2024 |
| SATO, AMI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/09/2024 |
| GOODING HEALTH HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2022 |
| STANDARD BEARER HEALTHCARE OP LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2022 |
| THE ENSIGN GROUP INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $608K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in ID
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Idaho Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 135134. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.