Montecito Post Acute Care and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 203 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 222 beds and averages 201.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.23 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.51 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.40 to 0.82 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations of practice, staff and representative interviews the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#39) while smoking. The deficient practice resulted in the resident sustaining life-threatening injuries. Findings include: Resident #39 was admitted originally on March 3, 2014 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include hemiplegia and hemiparesis, peripheral vascular disease, dementia, long QT syndrome, cognitive communication disorder, anemia and major depressive disorder. Review of resident #39 's clinical record revealed a smoking policy/consent dated December 6, 2018 with the resident ' s signature. Review of the resident ' s clinical record revealed a care plan focus of ' potential for injury related to smoking ' created on August 25, 2014 and last revised September 12, 2022. The goal was that the resident will have no injuries related to smoking and will be compliant with smoking protocols and individual smoking plan until the next…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate assessment, monitoring, and supervision to prevent elopement for 2 (residents #22 and #19) of 5 sampled residents. The deficient practice could result in injury to residents.-Regarding Resident #22Resident #22 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Metabolic encephalopathy, cognitive communication deficit, restlessness and agitation, chronic kidney disease, , muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, protein-calorie malnutrition, altered mental status, seizures, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, unspecified mood affective disorder, anxiety disorder, tobacco use, major depressive disorder, dementia, severe, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, and mood disturbance.An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment.A care plan focus initiated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing was provided on weekends to meet the needs of multiple residents (#59, and #162). The deficient practice could result in residents' care needs not being met. Findings Include: -Regarding Resident #59 Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure and quadriplegia. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The assessment also indicated that the resident was dependent on staff assistance when moving from a laying to sitting position, and that the ability to get on and off the toilet was not assessed due to a medical condition or safety concern. An interview was conducted on February 11, 2024, at 10:05 a.m. with Resident #59's Representative, who stated that the facility had been understaffed the last couple weeks, with just…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews and observations The facility failed to ensure proper nail care for one of thirty-six sampled residents (#104) was performed. This deficient practice could result in resident grooming and hygiene needs not being met. Findings include: Resident #104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hydrocephalus, muscle weakness, and hyperlipidemia. Review of resident #104's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, which indicates severe cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment also revealed the resident needed substantial/maximal assistance for showering/bathing and personal hygiene. Review of the facility's shower sheets dated January 3, 7, 10, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, 24, 27, 28, 30, and 31, 2025, and February 4, 7, and 11, 2025, reveal that the resident #104 did not need their fingernails or toenails clipped and no clipping was performed. Resident #104 was observed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records and policy, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure an order for pain medication was followed as prescribed for one Resident (#288). The deficient practice of administering unnecessary medication may result in undesirable medication-induced harm. Finding includes: Resident #288 was admitted into the facility on February 03, 2025 with diagnoses that included chronic atrial fibrillation, dysphagia, type 2 diabetes mellitus and a stage III pressure ulcer. Review of the physician orders revealed the following: - Acetaminophen Oral Tablet 325 milligrams (Acetaminophen) to give 2 tablets by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain between 1-3 with a start date of February 03, 2025. - Oxycodone HCl oral tablet 10 milligrams (Oxycodone HCl) to give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain between 4-10 with a start date of February 03, 2025. Review of progress note signed by Licensed Practical Nurse (staff # 93) on February 09, 2025 at 12:01 p.m. and at 09:35 p.m. showed that resident was given Oxycodone HCl oral tablet 10 milligrams…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policies and practices, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of showers/baths in the clinical record for two residents (#190 and #193). The deficient practice could result in an inaccurate documentation resulting in the potential of needed cares not being provided. Findings include: -Resident #193 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of that included displaced fracture of the first cervical vertebra, repeated falls, and acute urinary tract infection without hematuria. The shower sheets record revealed the resident received a bath or shower on March 3,7,10, 14, 17, 18, 21, 24, 28 and 31, 2022. These shower sheets were signed by the CNA and the nurse. contained both CNA and nurse signatures for each shower or bath recorded. However, the March 2022 CNA documentation for showers/bathing revealed that resident #193 received a bath or shower on March 3, 7, 17, 21, 24, 28, and 31, 2022. The documentation did not include that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident was free from unnecessary medication by failing to ensure there was a adequate indication for the use of antibiotic medication for one resident (#193). The deficient practice could result in residents receiving unnecessary antibiotics which could result in infectious microorganisms with increased drug resistance and/or superinfection. Findings include: Resident #193 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of that included displaced fracture of the first cervical vertebra, repeated falls, and acute urinary tract infection without hematuria. The IDT (interdisciplinary team) note dated December 27, 2021 included that the resident had a cystitis and was on Cefdinir (antibiotic) for 7 days. The antibiotic therapy care plan dated December 28, 2021 included that the resident was on antibiotic therapy related to UTI (urinary tract infection) prophylaxis for 7 days. Intervention included to administer medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical documentation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure preferences regarding meals were honored for one resident (#287). The deficient practice could result in resident's autonomy not exercised. Findings include: Resident #287 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of toxic encephalopathy and protein calorie malnutrition. A care plan initiated on August 8, 2023 included the resident had a potential nutritional problem related to diagnoses of protein calorie malnutrition and had increased protein needs related to wound healing due to a pressure ulcer. Interventions included to honor resident rights to make personal dietary choices and provide dietary education as needed. A nursing note dated August 8, 2023 revealed the resident was alert and oriented x 4. The mini nutritional assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a score of 10 indicating the resident at risk of malnutrition. The nutrition admission evaluation dated August 14, 2023 revealed an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical documentation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure treatment was administered as ordered by the physician for one resident (#27). The deficient practice could result in resident not receiving care and services based on his assessed needs. Findings include: Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of spinal stenosis cervical region, spondylosis with myopathy cervical region and functional quadriplegia. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included the resident had moderately cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance one-person physical assistance for most activities of daily living. The assessment also included the resident rejected care 1-3 days during the last 7 days of the look back period. A care plan dated July 25, 2023 included the resident had an alteration in neurological status related to spinal stenosis and spondylosis, status post repeat spinal surgeries. It also included the resident was a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-07-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, and policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#162) received the necessary care to prevent and to promote the healing of pressure ulcers. The sample size was 3 residents. The deficient practice could result in formation or worsening of pressure ulcers. Findings include: Resident #162 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Hemiplegia, Hemiparesis r/t cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, type 2 diabetes mellitus, diabetic chronic kidney disease, and morbid obesity. Review of the care plan initiated on August 23, 2021 revealed an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit care plan with interventions that included restorative nursing assistant (RNA) to don/doff bilateral PRAFO (pressure relief ankle foot orthosis) x 6 hours as tolerated and out of bed in Geri-chair as tolerated by the resident to promote functional body position. Review of physician's orders revealed an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-07-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff members wore hair restraints and food items were stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The deficient practice could increase the risk of foodborne illness. Findings include: Regarding hair restraints During the initial kitchen observation conducted on June 27, 2022 at 8:30 a.m., a staff member who had a long, bushy beard, approximately 4 inches in length was observed with his beard unrestrained while putting away supplies around the kitchen. Another observation of the kitchen was conducted on June 29, 2022 at 10:05 a.m. During this observation, a staff member without a hair restraint was walking around the kitchen to include the walk-in fridge putting away supplies. In an interview conducted with the dietary manager (staff #318) on June 29, 2022 at 1:46 p.m., she stated that part of the staff's attire/grooming standards is that hair including facial hair is restrained while working in the kitchen. The facility policy titled Personal Hygiene dated 2018…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-05-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ