No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Springdale Village Post Acute

7255 East Broadway Road, Mesa, AZ 85208 · For profit - Corporation · 122 certified beds · (480) 981-8844 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (480) 981-8844 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 2024
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
7525 E Broadway Rd Ste 2 · (480) 981-9800 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.1 mi
420 S Sossaman Rd · (480) 325-4777 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7246 E Main St · (480) 641-0469 · Call to confirm hours
Park
306 S Jefferson Ave · (480) 644-7529 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
7335 E Broadway Rd · (480) 981-0802

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.0%10.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%5.3%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.2%3.9%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.1%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.2%21.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.8%20.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.0%10.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine67.2%87.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission33.4%23.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit0.0%10.4%12.0%check this — see note marked star below the table

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.65U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.35hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.65 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.5%CMS range 40.0–66.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 5.9–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge57.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.67
RN hours/ resident / day
1.23
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.88
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.78
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.40
RN hoursweekends
50.0%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 50.8 residents a day — about 42% occupied, or roughly 71 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-19)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-04)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-05-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents. The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving appropriate care and treatment that they need.Findings include: The PBJ (Payroll-Based Journal) Staffing Data Report revealed the facility triggered for excessively low weekend staffing for FY (fiscal year) Quarter 2 2025 (January 1 - March 31), and Quarter 4 2025 (July 1 - September 30). Per the report, submitted weekend staffing data was excessively low. The PBJ revealed the facility triggered for failure to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours/day for FY Quarter 1 2025 (October 1- December 31), FY Quarter 2 2025 (January 1 - March 31). Per the report, submitted 24 hours/day licensed nursing coverage was excessively low. The 2026 Facility Assessment, reviewed February 2026, revealed that the facility was licensed to provide care for 122 residents and had an average daily census of 35-50, which consisted of both long and short-term stays. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, staff interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. The deficient practice has the potential to affect resident care.Findings include:Review of the PBJ (payroll-based journal) Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter 2, 2025 (January 1 - March 31) revealed No RN hours on the following dates:January 1, 2025January 2, 2025January 3, 2025January 4, 2025January 5, 2025January 6, 2025January 7, 2025January 8, 2025January 9, 2025January 10, 2025January 11, 2025January 12, 2025January 13, 2025January 14, 2025January 15, 2025January 16, 2025January 17, 2025January 18, 2025January 19, 2025January 20, 2025January 21, 2025January 22, 2025January 23, 2025January 24, 2025January 25, 2025January 26, 2025January 27, 2025January 28, 2025January 29, 2025January 30, 2025January 31, 2025February 1, 2025February 2, 2025February 3, 2025February 4, 2025February 5, 2025February 6, 2025February 7, 2025February 8, 2025February 9, 2025February 10, 2025February 11,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-19 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure current nurse staffing information was posted on a daily basis. The deficient practice could result in staffing information not being readily available to residents and visitors.Findings include:Upon entry, an observation was conducted on May 17, 2026 at 7:34 a.m. in the facility lobby. The date listed on the daily staffing posting posted in the facility lobby was observed to be May 14, 2026. The daily posting revealed 1 RN scheduled from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., 3 LPN's from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., 5.66 CNA's from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., 0 RN hours posted from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m., 3 LPN's from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m., and 4 CNA's from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m.A second observation occurred on May 17, 2026 at 1:16 p.m., which revealed the daily staff posting was updated to the date of May 17, 2026.An interview was conducted on May 19, 2026 at approximately 1:52 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON/Staff #61). The DON stated that it is the facility expectation that daily staffing postings are updated daily and displayed in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure that a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 1 evaluation was completed after 30 days for 1 of 18 sampled residents (Resident #14) with adiagnosis of Serious Mental Illness (SMI). This deficient practice occurred within a resident census (universe) of 70. Failure to complete the required PASRR screening and referral process may result in residents with serious mental illness not being identified for, assessed for, or receiving necessary specialized mental health services and supports. -Regarding Resident #14Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, rheumatoid arthritis, and hypertension.A care plan initiated on August 18, 2025 lists resident has self-care performance deficit due to bipolar disorder, potential for mood problem related to disease process and medication side effects,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, and review of facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that physician orders for weekly weights were followed for two residents (#77 and #14) in accordance with professional standards. The deficient practice could result in a lack of monitoring of weight changes and malnutrition. -Regarding Resident #77 Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included displaced trimalleolar fracture of the right lower leg, muscle weakness, lobar pneumonia, coccidioidomycosis, type 2 diabetes, schizophrenia, depression, chronic kidney disease, polyneuropathy, hyperlipidemia, and a history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction. A physician's order dated February 5, 2026, revealed weekly weights for 4 weeks, every day shift, every 7 days for 4 weeks. An admission nutrition evaluation dated February 6, 2026, revealed that the resident was at risk for malnutrition with a mini…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (#15 and #43) reviewed for advance directives right to formulate an advance directive. The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving proper care according to their preferences or potential harm to the resident ' s life. Findings Include: -Regarding Resident #15 Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia, COVID-19, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypoxemia, type 2 diabetes, protein-caloric malnutrition, anxiety, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A physician ' s order dated February 6, 2023 was written for full code. A care plan initiated on February 6, 2023 revealed a focus on Resident #15 having an advance directive of full code with an intervention to call for help immediately and begin basic life support if the resident became unresponsive. A Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews with staff, and facility policies, the facility failed to ensure that 2 residents (#23 & #62) representatives were informed after a change in condition. Findings include: Resident #23 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, Parkinson's disease, and cerebral infarction. A care plan initiated on December 28, 2022 included that this resident was at risk for falls related to weakness and/or debility. A 5-day scheduled assessment Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] included that this resident was moderately cognitively impaired and that this resident required extensive assistance for most activities of daily living including transfers. A narrative note dated January 15, 2023 included that this resident experienced a fall and that provider was notified of the fall however, family not notified. An interview was conducted on April 10, 2025 at 10:02 A.M. with a Registered Nurse (RN/staff #23) who said that a soon as a resident falls, staff do an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews with staff, and facility policies, the facility failed to ensure that professional standards were followed in regards to care planning and an interdisciplinary review of the fall regarding one resident (#210). Findings include: Resident #210 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of encephalopathy, aphasia, and depression. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] included that this resident was severely cognitively impaired and that this resident required partial/moderate assistance for transfers from chair to bed and toilet transfers. A care plan initiated on March 19, 2025 included that this resident was at risk for falls related to to a history of falls and cognitive impairment. This care plan's latest update was on March 20, 2025. A nursing note dated March 21, 2025 included that the resident was observed on the floor by the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and that the resident said that she slid off the bed. This note included that the nurse assessed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#110) medication was administered according to physician orders. The deficient practice could result in medication errors that could harm residents. Findings include: Resident #110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2023 with a diagnosis of anemia in chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary and type 2 diabetes. Review of the MDS (Multiple Date Set) dated February 24. 2023 reveals a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of the discharge instructions and medication orders from the hospital state cyclobensaprine 10 mg oral tablet, 1 tab oral three times a day as needed for spasms. Review of the orders upon admission to the facility, that were transcribed from the hospital discharge sheet show the same order states cyclobenzaprine HCI oral tablet 10 mg, give 3 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for spasms. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to properly monitor one of three sampled residents (#62) who were at risk of elopement. The deficient practice could result in elopement, and physical injury. Findings include: Resident #62 was admitted on [DATE] with dysphagia, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, cognitive communication deficit, and depression. There was no evidence of a completed admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. An Elopement Screen dated April 5, 2023, revealed that the resident had a history of wandering, exhibited exit seeking behavior, and had no previous history of exiting a facility or home without supervision. The resident was determined to be at risk to elope and to be placed on elopement risk protocol. A care plan was initiated April 7, 2025, revealed there was no evidence of a focus or risk of elopement placed in the comprehensive care plan. Review of the clinical record revealed no evidence of a wander risk assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, facility policy review, State Agency complaint tracking system, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and readily accessible for one resident (#110). The deficient practice could result pertinent medical information being missed by staff members which could be harmful. Findings include: Resident #110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2023 with a diagnosis of anemia in chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary and type 2 diabetes. Review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE]. 2023 reveals a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. The complaint filed at the State Agency on March 9, 2023, revealed that while the resident was admitted to the facility she did not receive the insurance authorized time for therapy. Review of the facility documentation revealed the facility ownership had changed on March 1, 2025. The clinical record revealed no documentation of any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interviews with residents and staff, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control guidelines were implemented and followed for one resident (#1). The deficient practice could result in the spread of infectious disease. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, allergic rhinitis, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident's cognition was intact. Review of the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) task log for bowel movements revealed an entry on January 1, 2025 at 9:39PM, which indicated Resident #1 had experienced three episodes of loose/ diarrhea stools. It was also revealed that the bowel movements charted on January 1, 2025 at both 4:23PM and 9:39PM were incontinent bowel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to protect the rights of one resident (#1) to be free from abuse by staff. The deficient practice could result in appropriate action not taken and further abuse of residents. Findings include: Resident #1 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebrovascular disease (CVA), dementia and major depressive disorder. The care plan dated August 22, 2024 revealed that the resident was at risk for skin breakdown related to a decline in mobility/transfers/repositioning. Interventions included to administer ointments or medications as ordered as preventative measure and to assist resident to reposition while in bed or wheelchair as needed. The care plan on ADLs (activities of daily living) dated August 22, 2024 revealed that the resident was at risk for ADL self-care performance deficit related to weakness/debility. Interventions included staff participation was required with bathing, turning and repositioning,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's manual, the facility failed to ensure the completion of comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three residents (#8, #10, #12) within the regulatory time frames. The deficient practice could result in inadequate assessment of resident needs. Findings include: Regarding Resident #8 Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the MDS revealed both an annual assessment dated [DATE] and a quarterly assessment dated [DATE] were still In Progress. The annual and quarterly assessments were not completed in the required timeframe for resident #8. Regarding Resident #10 Resident #10 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Review of the MDS revealed a quarterly assessment dated [DATE] was In Progress. The MDS assessment for resident #10 was not completed in the required timeframe. Regarding Resident #12 -Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, review of records, documents and policy, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for one resident (#4). The deficient practice could result in the resident's care needs not being met. Findings included: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, depression, anxiety disorder, and seizures. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating cognitively intact; and, resident received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. Review of the physician orders revealed the following orders: abilify oral tablet 10 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth one time a day for bipolar disorder dated November 27, 2023 and end date on November 30, 2023; abilify 10 mg one tablet by mouth at bedtime for bipolar disorder frequent mood changes dated December 29, 2023; anti-psychotic medication use: observe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that three staff members (#35, staff #15, and staff #17) had current cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) certification training on file. The deficient practice could put the resident's safety at risk and could result in needs not being met. Findings included: On [DATE] at 11:14 AM, a review of employees' files was conducted along with the Human Resources (HR) Director and Business Office Director (staff #52). During the employees' files review the following were identified: - License Practical Nurse (LPN/staff #35) CPR certification expiration date [DATE]. - Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA/staff #15) CPR certification expiration date [DATE]. - Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)/staff #17) CPR certification expiration date [DATE]. On [DATE] at 12:35 PM, an interview was conducted with Staff #52 and he stated that he oversaw the operation for the HR and business office, performed and provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed for a resident (#14) discharge. The deficient practice could result in an unsafe discharge for residents. Findings include: Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, kidney disease, and type 2 diabetes. The discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of a progress note indicated resident #14 received a notice of discharge on [DATE] and transferred to a sister facility on January 2, 2024. The progress note did not indicate a full discharge summary was provided to the resident or the resident's representative at the time of discharge. An interview was conducted with the Director of Social Services (staff #72) on April 3, 2024 at 8:53 AM. Staff #72 indicated they were not sure what the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0680 — isolated
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, facility documents and employee record review, the facility failed to ensure that the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. The deficient practice could result in the activities program not being directed by a qualified professional Findings included: On [DATE] at 11:14 AM, a review of staff #21's file was conducted with the Human Resources (HR) Director and Business Office Director (staff #52). On [DATE] at 12:35 PM, an interview was conducted with Staff #52 and he stated that he oversaw the operation for the HR and business office, performed and provided standard operating procedure for HR which included full screening and scheduling interview, conducted onboarding, ensuring paper work and packets were up to date, and verified licenses, fingerprint cards, and references. He said he also updated employee files. Staff #52 stated that he did not know the policy on licenses and certifications. He added that staff would be removed from the schedule immediately if their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#4) was administered pneumococcal vaccine. The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving vaccines. Findings included: Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and seizures. The admission Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating cognitively intact. Review of a document titled, Consent/Pneumonia Vaccine revealed a signed consent to receive the pneumonia vaccine on her initial admission date in August 23, 2023 and on November 26, 2023 readmission date. Her record revealed that an immunization of Pneumococcal PCV13 vaccine was required and there was no evidence that the resident received the vaccine. An interview was conducted on April 4, 2024 at 8:56 AM with the Infection Preventionist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was updated to reflect the changing needs of 1 out of 2 sampled residents (#3). The deficient practice could increase the risk for further falls and injuries. Findings include: Resident #3 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of a displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right hip, primary hypertension and cognitive communication deficit. The admission clinical evaluation with Braden Scale note dated August 11, 2022 revealed the resident had an admitting diagnosis of fracture of the right hip and had a history of falls. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident required extensive assistance for most activities of daily living (ADLs) and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition. A care plan dated August 17, 2022 revealed resident was at risk for falls related to unsteady gait and/or balance and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure necessary care and services related to pressure ulcer was provided for one resident (#3). The sample size was 18. The deficient practice may result in development of pressure ulcer. Findings include: Resident #3 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of a displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right hip, type 2 diabetes mellitus and cognitive communication deficit. The admission clinical evaluation with Braden Scale dated August 11, 2022 included that the resident had admitted with a surgical incision to her right trochanter (hip). She required extensive 2-person assistance with bed mobility and was incontinent of both bowel and bladder. According to the Braden Scale, the resident was at moderate risk for skin breakdown. A physician order dated August 11, 2022 included skin prep to bilateral heels every shift for prophylaxis. A care plan dated August 12, 2022 revealed the resident had skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure catheter care was provided according to physician orders for two residents (#42 and #222); and, failed to provide incontinence care to one resident (#274). The deficient practice could result in increased risk for complication such as infection, pain, and rehospitalization. Findings include: -Resident #42 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of carpal tunnel syndrome, multiple sclerosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, edema, and major depressive disorder, A physicians order dated November 21, 2022 included an order for a foley catheter, and catheter care every shift. The care plan initiated on November 21, 2022 revealed resident had foley catheter related to urinary retention as evidenced by neurogenic bladder. The goal was to minimize the risk and being free from urinary tract infections (UTI). Interventions included emptying drainage bag each shift and as needed; monitor amount and any changes in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5% by failing to ensure two out of three residents reviewed (#20 and #62 ) received medications according to the physician orders. The medication error rate was 6.67%. The deficient practice could result in further medication errors. Findings include: -Resident #20 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral and sacrococcygeal, type 2 diabetes mellitus and primary hypertension. A physician order dated November 10, 2022 included for bumetanide (diuretic) 1 mg (milligram) give one time a day for edema for 10 days and, to hold if SBP (systolic blood pressure) is less than 100. During the medication pass observation conducted with a licensed pratical nurse (LPN/staff #76) on December 13, 2022 at 7:37 a.m., staff #76 pulled all the resident's medications from the medication cart and reviewed the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that expired supplies and medication with missing and/or damaged labels were not available for resident use; and failed to ensure that a resident's home medications were not left unsecured on a counter in the medication room. The deficient practice could result in ineffective treatments/procedures, and/or in residents receiving expired medications, and/or schedule II - V controlled medications being unsecured. Findings include: An observation of the medication room was conducted with a licensed practical nurse (LPN/staff #76) on December 15, 2022 at 2:49 p.m. During the observation, the following expired biological/drugs were found mixed with unexpired items on the shelves in the medication room: -A tray of 29 red-topped blood collection tubes with an expiration date of October 31, 2022; -A box containing approximately 23 BD Safety LOK vacutainer blood collection sets with an expiration date of October 31, 2022; -A box of approximately 30 Regulator IV (intravenous) sets with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that biohazardous material/sharps were disposed of properly. The deficient practice may increase the risk for needle sticks and/or the spread of bloodborne pathogens. Findings include: On December 15, 2022 at 2:49 p.m., an observation of a medication room was conducted with a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/staff #76). On the counter above the medication refrigerator was an IV (intravenous) start kit that contained sterile IV supplies and a red container with a clear lid. There was also a saline flush connected to an IV start line lying across the top of the sterile supplies in the kit. On the end of the start line was a catheter which appeared to be soiled with a reddish substance. An interview with staff #76 was conducted on December 15, 2022 at 3:13 p.m. Staff #76 stated that the item laying on top of the IV start kit was an IV start line; and, there was a saline flush attached to the line on one end and a catheter attached to the other end. Staff #76 said that the catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy/procedure, the facility failed to ensure housekeeping services necessary to maintain a safe and clean environment were provided for one resident (#58). The sample size was 18. The deficient practice could result in residents not having a safe and clean environment. Findings include: Resident #58 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of urine retention, dysphagia, metabolic encephalopathy, chronic kidney disease, pneumonia, and dependence on oxygen. A care plan dated November 29, 2022 revealed resident was functioning at a reasonably dependent level concerning leisure pursuits. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which resident had intact cognition. An interview was conducted on December 12, 2022 at 12:16 p.m. with the resident's family who stated she visits resident #58 every day and stays until the evening.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, staff interviews and facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician for one resident (#123). The deficient practice could result in resident not provided with medication needed. Findings include: Resident #123 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of orthopedic aftercare, cervicalgia, spondylosis with myelopathy and spinal stenosis. The admission note dated November 26, 2021 included the resident had a surgical wound and had an admitting diagnosis of C5 cervical fusion. The health status note dated November 26, 2021 revealed the resident was alert and oriented x4 and was aware of orders for oxycodone (opioid) but would like to try Flexeril (muscle relaxant) first before taking oxycodone. Per the note, the resident did not like the feeling he gets when he takes oxycodone. A physician order dated November 26, 2021 revealed the following orders: -Acetaminophen (analgesic) 325 mg (milligrams) give 2 tablets by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#8) was provided showers. The deficient practice could result in grooming and hygiene needs not being met. Findings include: Resident #8 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included strain of muscle, fascia, and tendon at wrist and hand level, muscle weakness, spinal stenosis, and cerebral infarction. A physician order dated October 25, 2022 revealed an order for occupational therapy (OT) evaluation and treatment for ADL (activities of daily living) retraining. Review of admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14 which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The assessment also revealed the resident required extensive assistance with all ADLs and total dependence on staff for bathing. Review of the care plan initiated on November 7, 2022 revealed resident needed assistance with self-care and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of policy, revealed the facility failed to ensure one resident (#223) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The sample size was one. The deficient practice could rsult in resident not receiving the treatment based on their assessed need. Findings include: Resident #223 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of pneumonia, acute systolic (congestive) heart failure, and lymphedema. A care plan dated December 2, 2022 revealed resident had a skin breakdown related to lower extremity cellulitis and lymphedema. The goal was to minimize the risk of infection. Interventions included provision of treatments as ordered. The active orders for December 2022 revealed the following treatment: -Apply size F tubigrip (compression garment) to left and right lower extremity one time a day for alteration/edema management; -Cleanse left lateral and posterior lower leg with normal saline, pat dry, apply calcium alginate (absorbent),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Daily Staff Postings for nursing staff was accurate for actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed direct care nursing staff. The facility census was 74 residents and the sample was 18. The deficient practice could result in residents and visitors not being informed of accurate and current staffing information. Findings include: Review of the following four randomly chosen days of staff postings compared with the actual hours worked by staff on those days revealed that none of the staff postings matched the actual hours worked by staff: -December 1, 2022 staff posting indicated 80 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) hours worked, and 136 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) hours worked. However, the total hours worked revealed 87 LPN hours worked and 122.75 CNA hours worked; -December 2, 2022 staff posting indicated 96 LPN hours worked, and 136 CNA hours worked. However, the total hours worked revealed 90 LPN hours worked, and 142.95 CNA hours worked; -December 3, 2022 staff posting indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HOLM, JOSHUAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
NANDIPATI, HARISHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/13/2024
MONKS, CHANDLERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/13/2024
PETERSON, FORRESTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/13/2024
SATO, AMIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/13/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 4%Other / private 26%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$377per resident / day
operating cost
$11,471per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$333per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arizona Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Arizona
$8,365/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,437/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,250/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 035207. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next