Camelback Post Acute Care And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 128 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 107 beds and averages 84.3 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.66 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.93 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-11-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to coordinate one resident's (#4) care/medications with hospital physician to ensure medications were given according to physician instructions. The deficient practice resulted in significant harm to the resident. Findings included: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 10/22/2023 with diagnoses that included epilepsy and traumatic brain injury (TBI). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 which suggested severe cognitive impairment. Review of a discharge paperwork from a hospital with a printed date of 10/19/2023 revealed a physician order for Phenytoin (anti-convulsant) 50 mg (milligram) oral tablet, chewable 3 tab(s) oral twice a day; Clobazam (sedative) 10 mg oral tablet 2 tablets oral twice a day. The hospital discharge order also included an order to continue taking Cenobamate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure care and services regarding oxygen therapy were provided to meet the needs of one of four sampled residents (Resident #3). The deficient practice could result in a resident not receiving necessary respiratory care, and could result in a worsening medical condition and physical harm.Findings include:Resident #3 was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit, schizophrenia, abnormalities of gait and mobility, acquired absence of right leg below the knee, acquired absence of left toe(s), fracture of shaft of left fibula, atrial fibrillation, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, need for assistance with personal care, and personal history of other mental and behavioral disorders.Physician orders dated November 23, 2025, included:- PRN (as needed) oxygen, to titrate between 1-5 liters per minute…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff and resident interviews, facility documentation, and policy and procedures, the facility failed to protect the rights of one resident, resident (#1) to be free from verbal abuse by staff. The deficient practice could result in further abuse. Findings Include: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included spinal stenosis, retention of urine, hypertension, fibromyalgia, obesity, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, need for assistance with personal care, and low back pain. The care plan dated November 26, 2025, had a focused care area for risk of impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought process related to the new environment. Interventions included engaging in simple, structured activities that avoid overly demanding tasks, identifying yourself at each interaction, face when speaking, and making eye contact, reducing any distractions-turn off the TV and radio, and closing the door. Use simple, directive sentences. Provide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that soiled linens and laundry were not stored in public areas and were covered to prevent the spread of infection. The deficient practice could result in the spread of infection to residents. Findings include: On May 28, 2024 at approximately 8:01 a.m., a yellow round bin and one gray square bin full of soiled sheets and other laundry items were observed to be overflowing in the hallway on Hall 200 by the laundry room. There was also a smaller silver container full of dirty towels and the lid was not completely covering the bin. The hallway smelled of urine. On May 28, 2024 at approximately 8:05 a.m. a female staff was observed pushing the yellow round bin and gray square bin full of soiled laundry through the exit door near the laundry room and left them outside. The smaller silver container with dirty towels was left in the hallway. On May 28, 2024 at the Housekeeping Supervisor (staff #76) was observed entering the Hall 200 through the exit door when the soiled sheets…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that soiled linens and laundry were not stored in public areas and were covered to prevent odor and ensure a comfortable environment. The deficient practice could impact the residents' safe, sanitary, and homelike environment. Findings include: On May 28, 2024 at approximately 8:01 a.m., a yellow round bin and one gray square bin full of soiled sheets and other laundry items were observed to be overflowing in the hallway on Hall 200 by the laundry room. There was also a smaller silver container full of dirty towels and the lid was not completely covering the bin. The hallway smelled of urine. On May 28, 2024 at approximately 8:05 a.m. a female staff was observed pushing the yellow round bin and gray square bin full of soiled laundry through the exit door near the laundry room and left them outside. The smaller silver container with dirty towels was left in the hallway. On May 28, 2024 at the Housekeeping Supervisor (staff #76) was observed entering the Hall 200 through the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on documentation, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to assess one resident (#35) for pain and take vitals when admitted to the facility in a timely manner, and failed to administer pain medication with pain parameters for one resident (#27). The deficient practice could result in residents' pain not being identified and addressed, residents' being overmedicated or under-medicated. Findings include: Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included displaced fracture of left tibial tuberosity, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, Epilepsy, and type II diabetes. Review of the order summary revealed: -April 27, 2024, monitor level of pain for every shift/using the following scale: 0=no pain, 1-3=mild pain, 4-6=moderate pain, 7-10=severe pain. -April 27, 2024, Tylenol tablet 325 mg give two tablets by mouth every six hours as needed for pain 1-3. -April 27, 2024, Celecoxib capsule 200 mg give one capsule by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated, food items were not expired, temperature logs were maintained, equipment was sanitized, and food was served under sanitary conditions. The deficient practice could increase the risk of foodborne illness. Findings include: Regarding food labeling and dating: During the initial kitchen observation conducted on April 21, 2024 at 7:17 a.m., two items wrapped in foil was found in the walk-in freezer which was unmarked/not labeled and not dated. Additionally, cereal dispenser for what appears to be [NAME] Krispies, Raisin Bran, Corn Flakes, and Cheerios did not have an expiration date. A bin containing oatmeal was marked 2/16 but it is unknown if that is the filled date or the expiration date. A bin containing lentil was marked 2/1 and did not specify if it was the fill date or expiration date. A container marked bread crumbs was labeled 2/1 but the same container was also marked Panko with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that dirty dishes were not left in a common areas where residents have access, and that common areas were cleaned and disinfected. The deficient practice could result in residents becoming ill or infected. Findings include: On April 21, 2024 at 8:27 a.m. brown liquid in a gray cup with a straw was observed on a mobile tray in the 200 hall just outside a resident's room and it was unattended. Also, a tray was observed in the Northeast dining room with toast, leftover cereal in a bowl that resembled heart shaped Cheerios, one bowl of leftover oatmeal and milk, leftover scrambled eggs on the plate, and orange liquid in a Styrofoam cup with a straw. The tray was unattended and there were three residents sitting in the dining area watching TV. On April 21, 2024 at 8:49 a.m. feces, approximately 1.5 inches, was observed in the middle of the hallway in front of room [ROOM NUMBER]. Staff were observed walking by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#81) clinical record included the required information for transfer/discharge. The deficient practice could result in residents not having a safe and effective transition of care. Findings include: Resident #81 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including an unspecified fracture of the right femur, end stage renal disease, osteomyelitis, encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, complete amputation of left foot, dependence on renal dialysis, type II diabetes mellites with diabetic polyneuropathy, chronic systolic heart failure and aneurysm of iliac artery. It was further noted in the electronic health record that the resident left the facility against medical advice on August 20, 2023. A review of the MDS (minimum data set) revealed no noted score for the BIMS (brief interview of mental status). A review of the electronic medical record,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#44) representative was able to participate in the care planning process. The deficient practice could result in residents and representatives not participating in and understanding their plan of care. Findings include: Resident #44 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection, atrial fibrillation, aphasia, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the cognition care plan initiated on November 20, 2023 indicated that the resident is at risk for impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought process. Interventions include to communicate with family/caregivers regarding resident's capabilities and needs, and social services to provide psychosocial support as needed. The resident's admission record indicated that the resident has two emergency contacts. The first emergency contact (primary) is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that a potentially dangerous item was not left in a public area on one resident's (#1) mobile tray where other residents could access it. The deficient practice could result in residents injuring themselves. Findings include: On April 21, 2024 at 8:27 a.m., a mobile tray was observed in the hallway by room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a blue razor with a clear plastic cover over the blade on the tray and the tray was left unattended. An interview was conducted on April 21, 2024 at 8:37 a.m. with a certified nursing assistant (CNA/staff #88), who stated that they put the mobile tray outside of the resident's room because there is no room for his wheelchair. She stated that the razor is supposed to be thrown away once it has been used and there is a risk of residents cutting themselves on the razor. After the interview, staff #88 began walking away and the surveyor had to intervene and ask her to remove the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ