No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Granite Creek Health & Rehabilitation Center

1045 Scott Drive, Prescott, AZ 86301 · For profit - Partnership · 128 certified beds · (928) 778-9603 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (928) 778-9603 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 2024
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
1055 Ruth St · (928) 445-5211 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
123 Merritt Ave · (928) 778-5900 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1112 Iron Springs Road · (928) 445-7370 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.9%10.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.3%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.6%3.9%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.8%2.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.7%12.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.1%21.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.0%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.5%20.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.5%10.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine73.5%87.3%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.7%23.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.2%10.4%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 375 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
71.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.49U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.27hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 71.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 123 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.3%CMS range 48.9–58.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 9.3–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge71.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge69.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge92.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 5.3–10.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.751.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
1.01
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.70
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.15
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 104.4 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.70 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.17 on weekdays — 3% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-07)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-02)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (#25) was provided quality of care regarding prevention, assessment, and treatment of moisture associated skin damage (MASD), according to professional standards. The deficient practice could lead to worsening of a skin issues, increased pain, and physical harm of a resident.-Findings include:Resident #25 was admitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic left knee, unspecified fracture of left femur, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, malignant neoplasm of female breast, and need for assistance with personal care.An Initial admission assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #25 had no skin problems on admission.A care plan focus dated March 5, 2026, included that Resident #25 had a pressure ulcer or the potential for pressure ulcer development, due to her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-07 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, staff interviews, and review of facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure that the Ombudsman was notified of the transfer/discharge for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#115, #118, & 110). The deficient practice could lead to notifications and pertinent information regarding the discharge/transfer not being provided. Findings include: -Resident #110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encounter for other orthopedic aftercare of right hip fracture, hemiplegia of the right dominant hand, failure to thrive, dementia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The care plan initiated on October 4, 2025, revealed a focus on failure to thrive, diabetes, high blood pressure, seizure, urinary tract infection, dementia, and anorexia. The goal would be for the resident to be free from complications related to infection. The interventions included to administer medications as ordered and to monitor and document for side effects and effectiveness; dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that food items were palatable, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. The deficient practice could decrease residents' desire to eat which could impact their nutrition status and lead to slower recovery from illnesses or injury. Findings include:Review of the facility's 2025 Grievance log revealed the following food related grievances for the following months:January: general dietary/food concernsAugust: dietary concerns regarding temperatureOctober: food preference issues (2 different residents)November: general dietary/food concernReview of the 2025 Resident Council Meeting Minutes documented the following food related issues brought up by attendees during the indicated month's meeting:January: concerns regarding menu varietyFebruary: concerns regarding food portionsMarch: concerns regarding food portionsApril: concerns regarding food portionsJune: concerns with dietary restrictionsJuly: indicated that residents were educated regarding proper food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were not left at the bedside for two residents (#62 and #121). Census was 100. The deficient practice could result in harm to the residents and/or visitors who have access to medications.-Resident #121 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included pneumonia (lung infection), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate), hypertension (high blood pressure), and need for assistance with personal care. A review of order summary revealed an order dated December 31, 2025, for Metoprolol Tartrate oral tablet 25 MG (milligram) give half a tablet by mouth two times a day for high blood pressure, and an order for Saccharomyces Boulardii (probiotic) capsule 250 mg give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for probiotic. The IDT (interdisciplinary team) - BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) dated January 1, 2026 revealed a BIMS score of 14.0, indicating that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, facility documentation, review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure infection control standards/protocols related to Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) and hand hygiene were followed by staff. Census was 100. The deficient practice could result in the spread of infection to residents and staff.Findings include: -Regarding Hand Hygiene An observation of hall 100 was conducted on January 05, 2026, at 8:09 a.m. a certified nursing assistant (CNA/staff #55) went into a resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and took the Resident's breakfast tray and exited the room. The CNA then entered the another resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and touched the resident's bed and call light of the resident. The CNA exited room [ROOM NUMBER] and went directly into resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The CNA did not perform hand hygiene before and after entering resident rooms and touching items found in the rooms. An interview was conducted on January 05, 2026, at 8:36 AM with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to ensure that 7 of 7 sampled residents (#65, #344, #38, #13, #19, #58, and #33) were provided a comfortable and homelike environment. The deficient practice could have a negative psychosocial impact on residents. -Regarding Residents #65 and #344: An observation was conducted on September 30, 2024 at 10:43 AM of room [ROOM NUMBER] belonging to Resident #65 who was not in the room at that time. From the doorway, observation of the wall revealed that paint had been scraped off of behind and surrounding the headboards of both A and B beds. An additional observation was conducted of the wall in room [ROOM NUMBER] later that day on September 30, 2024 at 2:25 PM. Per the floor nurse, Resident #65 was still out at an appointment. The area where the paint had been scraped off of the wall had still not been re-painted over. It appeared white where the paint had previously been scraped off, in contrast to the tan color of the wall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, clinical record and policy review, the facility failed to protect the rights of three residents (#22, #54, #89) to be free from abuse. The deficient practice may result in further resident to resident abuse. Findings include: -Resident #22 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of a Crohn's disease, acute kidney failure, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and depression. The care plan dated January 6, 2022 revealed that resident was taking antidepressant medication related to depression for episodes of crying. Review of care plan dated October 13, 2022 included the resident was on anti-anxiety medication related to restlessness, racing thoughts, and inability to sleep. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 15 which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Moreover, the MDS revealed no indication of atypical behavior or presences of psychiatric/mood disorders. Review of an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for one resident (#60). The deficient practice resulted in resident wandering into other resident rooms uninvited. Finding includes: Resident #60 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified cataract, hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia and chest pain. The initial admission record dated August 12, 2024 included that the resident was alert and oriented to time, place and person, was able to follow simple commands, had no behavior problems, was ambulatory or self-mobile in the wheelchair. The elopement/wandering evaluation dated August 12, 2024 revealed a score of 5 indicating the resident was low risk for elopement/wandering. Per the documentation, the resident had no elopement history. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) note dated August 15, 2024 revealed the resident was alert and oriented x 3-4, had adequate hearing, was able to understand others and had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a medication cart was locked when unattended and that controlled medications in the medication storage room were properly secured according to facility policy. The deficient practice could result in residents or staff members having unrestricted access to medications and controlled substances. -Regarding the medication cart: An observation was conducted on October 01, 2024, at 7:28 AM in the hallway of the 400 unit. It was observed that a medication cart was unlocked without staff presently attending it or in close proximity. A nurse was observed to be in a room across the hall from the med cart, attending to the resident in the bed furthest from the door, looking opposite and away from the cart. An interview was conducted with this Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN, Staff #49) on the same day at 8:33 AM. Staff #49 acknowledged that she had left the cart unlocked while she was administering medication during med pass. An interview was conducted on October 02, 2024 at 11:28 AM with the Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-02 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide food within safe serving temperature. The deficient practice could result in foodborne illnesses among residents. Findings include: On October 1, 2024 at 12:12PM, the lunch tray line was observed, and the initial temperatures of the food were as follows: meat at 149 degrees Fahrenheit, the starch temped at 178 degrees Fahrenheit, the pasta salad temped at 70 degrees Fahrenheit. During this observation, staff #123 was interviewed and stated that the pasta salad will be put on ice to assist with the cooling of the component as it was not at their desired temperature range. On October 1, 2024 at 1:33PM, a test tray was brought into the conference room after being closely monitored and followed throughout the facility. The final temperatures of the food were as follows: Meat at 96.4 degrees Fahrenheit; Tater tots at 95.7 degrees Fahrenheit; Pasta salad at 75.6 degrees Fahrenheit; While Staff #11 was observed temping each food component, without sanitizing the temperature rod utilized by staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the areas used for preparing, cooking and serving food were cleaned and maintained sanitary in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The deficient practice could result in foodborne illnesses among residents. Findings include: On September 30, 2024 at 10:51 a.m., an observation was conducted of the facility's kitchen with the dietary supervisor (staff #14). At this time, the stove and stacked oven was observed to have grease build-up and burned debris under and behind the stove and stacked oven. Also, there was burned debris on the metal shelf on the front side of the deep fryer. Crackers and an applesauce cup were observed on the floor in the dry storage room. During this observation, staff #14 stated that cleaning of the kitchen happens daily, reported that the expectation in the kitchen is proper hand hygiene to prevent foodborne illness, that also includes hair and beard covering. Temperature…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control policies while serving, preparing, and distributing food to residents, and while providing care to one resident (#65). The deficient practices could result in foodborne illnesses among residents and the transmission of infection. -Regarding food preparation and distribution to residents: On September 30, 2024 at 10:51 a.m., an observation was conducted inside the facility's kitchen with the dietary supervisor (staff #14) who did not have a beard covering. At that time, staff #14 reported that the expectation in the kitchen is proper hand hygiene to prevent foodborne illness, that also includes hair and beard covering. On October 1, 2024 at 10:33AM, an observation was conducted of the facility's kitchen with the dietary supervisor (staff #14), cook (staff #123), and dietary aide (staff #11). At that time, staff #14 was observed without a beard covering. Staff #123 was observed at the sink rinsing their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory services were provided according to professional standards, specifically that an order was obtained for the use of oxygen, for one resident (#339). The deficient practice could result in residents receiving unnecessary supplemental oxygen, and the provider not being aware of the resident's status. -Findings include: Resident #339 was admitted into the facility on September 27, 2024, with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, hypertension, and coronary artery disease. A review of the resident's hospital discharge orders dated September 27, 2024 revealed no orders for oxygen use. The admission minimum data set assessment (MDS) had not yet been completed due to the resident's newly admitted status. Review of the facility's physician orders conducted on September 30, 2024 at 1:19 PM, revealed no evidence of orders for oxygen administration. On October 01, 2024 at 10:44 AM an additional review of resident #339 physician orders revealed no evidence of orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure dental needs were met for one sampled resident (#58). The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving necessary services for oral and dental care. Findings include: Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included subluxation of the right shoulder joint, sequelae of cerebral infarction, hypertension, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, and acute kidney failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating that the resident was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS did revealed that Section L - Oral/Dental Status was blank. Review of a physician order dated December 20, 2023 revealed dental consultation and treatment as needed. Review of the quarterly Nutrition evaluation dated March 19, 2024 revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#58) dietary needs were met. The deficient practice could place residents at risk of malnutrition and dissatisfaction with their meals. Findings include: Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included subluxation of the right shoulder joint, sequelae of cerebral infarction, hypertension, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, and acute kidney failure. Review of the nutrition care plan initiated on December 21, 2023 indicated a goal in which resident will maintain adequate nutritional status by maintaining weight with no signs and symptoms of malnutrition. Interventions included: provide, serve diet as ordered and registered dietitian to evaluate and make diet change recommendations PRN (as needed). Further review of the care plan did not indicate or address the resident's gluten allergy. A quarterly Nutrition evaluation dated March 19, 2024 revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide resident (#1) with physician ordered necessary wound care services. The deficient practice can put resident at risk for wound infection. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included acute kidney failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease, and recent surgical history of resection of the perforated bowel and placement of an ostomy. The Care plan initiated on July 21, 2024 stated the resident has actual impairment to skin integrity related to abdominal surgery present on admission. The goal stated that the resident will not have rehospitalization within 30 days. The interventions included to float heals, monitor/document location, size and treatment of skin injury, report abnormalities, failure to heal, signs and symptoms of infection, maceration etc. to medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure that medication was available for administration as ordered by the physician for one resident (#1). The deficient practice could result in the resident not receiving the needed medication. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of other seizures, hypertension, and neuropathy. A hospital progress note dated 5/21/2024 revealed that the resident had a history of myoclonic seizures; and, had tried Keppra (anti-seizure) in the past but could not tolerate this. The hospital clinical summary dated 5/23/2024 included that the resident had a diagnosis of seizure disorder. It also included to continue clonazepam 1 mg by mouth once a day at bedtime. A physician order dated 5/23/2024 included for clonazepam 1 mg at bedtime for anxiety AEB (as evidenced by) restlessness. The facility medication administration record (MAR) for 5/23/2024 revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, review of facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure that infection control guidelines related to oxygen use was followed for one resident (#2). The deficient practice could result in the spread of spread of disease to residents. Findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma (lung cancer) and dyspnea. A physician order dated 6/19/2024 included for 1-5 liters of oxygen as needed via nasal cannula to keep oxygen saturation greater than 90% for shortness of breath related to ineffective gas exchange. Another physician order dated 6/19/2024 included to change oxygen tubing every night shift and as needed. The daily skilled note dated 6/20/2024 revealed that the resident was alert and oriented x3; and that, the resident had no respiratory treatments. The physician admission progress note dated 6/20/2024 included that the resident was alert, ill-appearing, had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, staff interviews, personnel files, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#5) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice may result in resident not receiving trearment and care. Findings include: Resident #5 was admitted [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses including Ischemic cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, stage 4 chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the facility assessment dated [DATE], revealed care required by resident populations include residents who require assistance with bed mobility and transfers, and some who require total mechanical lift transfers, and some who are independently mobile. It further states that some residents are ones who can bear some weight, and who require assistance with sit-stand lift transfers. Types of assistance provided include but are not limited to bathing, showers, responding to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure that all resident shower rooms were in good repair. Findings include: During an initial observation and walk-through of both shower rooms conducted with the Maintenance Director (staff #10) on January 24, 2024 at 2:40 p.m., the following was observed: - Area 100/200 shower room only had 2 out of 5 shower stalls functional. - Area 100/200 shower room had an area on the tile floor that was either dirty or stained/discolored. - Area 300/400 shower room also only had 3 out of 5 shower functional stalls. - Area 300/400 shower room had cracked tiles on both the floor and lower wall of shower stalls. During an interview with the Maintenance Director (Staff #10) conducted on January 24, 2024 at 2:40 PM, staff #10 stated that having only 2 out of 5 shower stalls was not an issue since the staff try to only have one resident in the shower room at a time. Additionally, he stated that the broken and discolored tiles were not a concern. He said that they do a deep cleaning of the shower rooms. Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident's medications were administered as ordered by the provider based on standards of practice for one resident (#350). The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving prescribed doses of medications. Findings include: Resident #350 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypertension, and convulsions. A care plan initiated on [DATE] indicated that the resident has acute/chronic pain. The goal was for resident to have adequate pain relief or be able to cope with pain. Interventions included to administer analgesia medication as ordered. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) could not be conducted. The MDS indicated that the resident has moderately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and the rules of the State Board of Nursing, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician for two residents (#4 and #5). The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving necessary medications. Findings include: -Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, osteoarthritis, acquired clubfoot - left foot, difficulty in walking and muscle weakness. The care plan initiated on May 26, 2021 revealed the resident had Parkinson's. Intervention included medication administered as ordered. The physician order dated August 9, 2022 included the following orders: -Carbidopa-levodopa (anti-Parkinson's agent) 50-200 mg (milligrams) tablet by mouth at bedtime; and, -Carbidopa-Levodopa 25-250 mg 2 tablets by mouth three times a day for Parkinson's Disease. This order was transcribed onto the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for September 2023 and revealed that the medication was not administered on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and the rules of the State Board of Nursing, the facility failed to ensure that an accurate accounting of controlled medications was maintained and reconciled for one resident (#5). The deficient practice could result in potential diversion of residents controlled medications. Findings include: Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of multiple sclerosis, benign prostatic hyperplasia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and cognitive communication deficit. The physician order dated July 24, 2023 included for oxycodone (opioid/narcotic) 10 mg (milligrams) tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. The care plan initiated on July 25, 2023 revealed the resident was taking an opioid for pain. Interventions included to administer the medication as prescribed and to educate on potential risks that included death. Review of the MAR (medication administration record) for August 2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control standards were maintained during medication administration. The deficient practice could result in the transmission of infection. Findings include: An observation of medication administration was conducted with a licensed practical nurse (LPN/staff #19) was conducted on October 11, 2023 at 7:25 a.m. The LPN entered the rooms of 7 residents and administered the prepared medications to each resident. However, during the entire observation, the LPN did not perform hand hygiene before and after preparation and administration of the medications to each resident and after exiting each resident's room. An interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)/Infection Control Nurse/staff #7) and Associate Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted on October 11, 2023 at 1:45 p.m. The ADON and Associate DON both stated that their expectation was for staff to sanitize their hands before and after each resident and wash their hands with soap and water after every fourth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#233) was treated with dignity and respect. The deficient practice could result in the resident's rights not promoted and protected. Findings include: Resident #233 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cellulitis of right and left lower limb, adult failure to thrive and alcoholic polyneuropathy. A daily skilled note dated [DATE] revealed the resident was alert and oriented x 4 with no active symptoms or treatments affecting level of consciousness, cognition, sleep, mood or behavior. Review of facility documentation revealed the roommate (resident #241) expired on [DATE]; and that, the deceased resident was left in the room with resident #233 until 1:00 p.m. on [DATE]. There was no evidence found in the clinical record that resident #233 was asked about leaving the room until the deceased body was transferred; or that, resident #233 agreed to leave the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure the resident representative for one resident (#234) was notified after he had a significant change in condition and was transferred to acute care facility. The deficient practice may result in resident representatives not notified and make any required decisions according to resident's treatment preferences and choices. Findings include: Resident #234 was admitted facility on July 13, 2022 with diagnoses of flail chest, traumatic pneumothorax, acute pain, muscle weakness, atrial fibrillation, Ogilvie syndrome, and anxiety disorder. Review of the clinical record face sheet included the resident had a DPOA (Durable Power of Attorney) and a financial responsible party. The HIPAA communication method request form signed by the resident and dated July 14, 2022 revealed the resident wanted information shared with the DPOA. A nursing note dated July 14, 2022 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, facility documentation, policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure adequate and comfortable temperature levels was provided to meet the needs for one resident (#50). The deficient practice could result in the resident's room not having a homelike and comfortable environment. The facility census was 88 and the sample was 18. Findings include: Resident #50 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, muscle weakness and difficulty in walking. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated resident had intact cognition. The assessment also revealed the resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility and transfers. The clinical record revealed documentation the resident was alert and oriented and able to make needs known. During an interview conducted on January 9, 2022, resident #50 stated that his room was cold at night; and that, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, staff interviews, and policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#184) was free from abuse. Findings include: -Resident #184 was readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, hypocalcemia, and muscle weakness. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed resident #184 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating resident had moderately impaired cognition. The nursing clinical note dated 11/12/2022 at 18:15 revealed after yelling and shaking at the resident (#184) the spouse appeared elevated, face flushed and speaking in loud voice. Verbal de-escalation techniques were used and the resident's spouse was able to be re-directed; and that, the spouse agreed to leave the building and get some rest. The documentation also included the resident remained only oriented to self; and was assessed and there was no injury found. Further, the documentation included the spouse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure information was provided to the receiving provider during transfer to hospital for one resident (#234). The deficient practice could result in the delay in treatment at the receiving facility because of lack of information regarding the reason for the transfer/discharge. Findings include: Resident #234 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of flail chest, traumatic pneumothorax, acute pain, muscle weakness, atrial fibrillation, Ogilvie syndrome, and anxiety disorder. Review of an admission note dated July 14, 2022 at 11:00 PM that revealed the resident agreed to transfer to the hospital due to multiple issues of pain overnight. The nursing note dated July 14, 2022 revealed the resident transferred to the hospital per resident's choice. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed an unplanned discharge to an acute hospital on July 14, 2022. However, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman regarding transfer/discharge to the hospital for one resident (#234). The deficient practice could result in Ombudsman not being informed of the reason for the transfer/discharge. Findings include: Resident # 234 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of flail chest, traumatic pneumothorax, acute pain, muscle weakness, atrial fibrillation, Ogilvie syndrome, and anxiety disorder. An admission note dated July 14, 2022 at 11:00 PM that revealed the resident agreed to transfer to the hospital due to multiple issues of pain overnight. The nursing note dated July 14, 2022 revealed the resident transferred to the hospital per resident's choice. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed an unplanned discharge to an acute hospital on July 14, 2022. However, review of the clinical record revealed no evidence that the Ombudsman was notified regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure consistent treatments were provided to two residents (#13, #233) with pressure ulcers. Findings include: -Regarding Resident #13 Resident # 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pressure ulcer sacral region, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, pressure ulcer left elbow stage 3, pressure ulcer of right heel, unstageable, type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, diabetic neuropathy, and bacteremia. The skin pressure ulcer weekly assessment dated [DATE] revealed a deep tissue injury (DTI) on the right heel and a stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer. The care plan initiated on July 27, 2022 revealed a care plan regarding pressure ulcer development with interventions to administer treatments as ordered. The physician order summary revealed the following active orders: -Weekly skin assessment every day shift every Saturday; -Clean the sacrococcygeal wound with Puracyn,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure pain management consistent with professional standards of practice was provided for one resident (#234). The deficient practice could result in unmanaged pain for residents. Findings include: Resident #234 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of flail chest, traumatic pneumothorax and acute pain. The admission care plan dated July 13, 2022, revealed that resident had acute pain related to left scapula fracture. Goal was that the resident will verbalize adequate relief of pain or ability to cope with incompletely relieved pain. Interventions included to administer analgesia medications per orders, anticipate need for pain relief and respond immediately to any complaint of pain, follow pain scale to medicate as ordered, and pain assessment every shift. Review of physician orders dated July 13, 2022 revealed the following: -Tylenol extra strength…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
STURDEVANT, TAMARAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
PETERSON, FORRESTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2019
ALBRECHTSEN, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/26/2015
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/25/2015
FITCH, CRAIGIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 59%Medicare 15%Other / private 27%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$381per resident / day
operating cost
$11,578per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$401per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arizona Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Arizona
$8,365/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,437/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,250/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 035131. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next