Catalina Post Acute And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

71.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 113 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 97.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.96 to 0.81 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-10-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#91) assessment was accurate and reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment. The deficient practice could result in the resident not receiving appropriate care that is necessary for their wellbeing.Findings include:Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, generalized muscle weakness, tracheostomy status, and dysphagia following cerebral infarction.Resident #91 was discharged from the facility on October 10, 2025.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] indicated Resident #91 completed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scored a 00 which indicated she had severe cognitive impairment. The same MDS also indicated Resident #91 had no impairments in in the upper (shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand) extremity.Review of the discharge record from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Facility The facility failed to ensure that food is labeled and dated in accordance with food safety practices.Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that food is labeled and dated in accordance with professional food safety standards.Findings include:An initial kitchen walk-through was conducted on September 14, 2025 at 9:00 AM. The cook, staff #55, was present during the walk-through, as the dietary manager was not on premises at the time. A bag of jalapenos, dated August 27, 2025, was observed in the cooling refrigerator. Staff #55 stated that the jalapenos should not be in the refrigerator more than 2 weeks. She removed the bag and stated that the risk for storing the jalapenos past the 2 week designated time frame could include foodborne illness. A further observation revealed a tomato, not bagged, with no indication of date or how long it had been there. A bag of lettuce was observed dated September 7, 2025 with no noted use-by date. Staff #55 stated that she was unsure how long these could be kept.During the same initial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the clinical record, staff interviews, and the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that 1 out of 23 residents (Resident # 7) received pain medication as ordered by the physician.Findings include: Resident # 7 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis of morbid obesity, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident # 7's care plan dated March 18, 2024, revealed that Resident # 7 was currently on opioids for pain management, with interventions that include administering opioids as prescribed. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating that Resident # 7 is cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS revealed opioid usage. Review of Orders dated August 16, 2025, for Resident # 7 revealed an order for Oxycodone oral tablet 10 milligrams (mg) to be given by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain rated as a 6-10.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an oxygen order was in place for 1 of 27 sampled residents (#45) in accordance with professional standards of practice. The deficient practice could result in being oxygen administered when not needed, oxygen concentration levels not aligned with the resident's needs, as well as appropriate monitoring, changing of oxygen tubing and documentation.Based on clinical record review, interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an oxygen order was in place for one resident (#45) out of 21 The deficient practice could result in being oxygen administered when not needed, oxygen concentration levels not aligned with the resident's needs, as well as appropriate monitoring, changing of oxygen tubing and documentation.Findings include:Resident #45 was initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including type II diabetes mellites with diabetic neuropathy, chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN/Registry Staff # 467), who was from a staffing agency and not employed by the facility directly, had the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs. This failure had the potential to affect all residents assigned to the RN's care during her shift. Findings include: Review of the facility 5-day report revealed alleged perpetrator RN (Registry/ Staff # 467) had been contracted through a nursing registry. Facility eMAR documents revealed that the RN (alleged perpetrator) worked at the facility as a registered nurse starting August 26, 2022 and no additional documentation for scheduled shifts worked in August 2022. Further review revealed the registry RN was scheduled to work the following days; September 2,3,4,9,10.11.16.17, 18, 23,24,25, and 30 for the 6PM-6AM shift. The facility became aware of the alleged perpetrator on September 19, 2022 when the Dietary Supervisor (Staff/#56) alerted the Director of Nursing (DON/Staff #147) of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record, resident and staff interviews and facility documents, the facility failed to ensure that two residents (#21, #52) received activities of daily living (ADL) care per facility policy. Failure to do so could result in psychosocial harm. Findings include: -Resident #52 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of sepsis and metabolic encephalopathy. A care plan dated July 2, 2024 included a self-care performance deficit related to weakness, and impaired mobility which included to encourage to participate to the fullest extent with each interaction. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] included that this resident was moderately cognitively impaired and that showering was not attempted due to a medical condition or safety concern. A document titled West Showers included that resident #52's room was to be provided showers 2 times a week by the 2 PM to 10 PM shift and that any missed showers were to be caught up on Sundays. This document included that shower sheets need to be filled out and signed by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, resident and staff interviews, and facility documentation, policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure room temperatures were within the safe temperature range. The deficient practice put the residents at increased risks for harm such as lack of sleep and heat stroke. Findings include: A TELS (Facility maintenance reporting) report for 6/1/2024 through 7/8/2024 did not include any requests for action regarding temperature. However, interviews with 8 residents included that they had been informing staff of the problems with temperatures. A document dated 6/26/2024 an order was placed for a new HVAC (Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning) unit on the south hallway, on 6/28/2024, 3 rental air condition units, 3 swamp coolers, and 5 portable fans were placed on the south hallway. A temperature logbook included that temperatures had been taken in 2 rooms in each hallway 2 times since the breakdown of the air conditioning unit, however documentation was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-27 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical records, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's code status was honored. Findings include: Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] with pneumonia, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. A 5 day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] included that this resident was severely impaired for daily decision making and had a long and short term memory problem. A Prehospital Medical Care Directive dated [DATE] included that In the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest, I refuse any resuscitation measures Including cardiac compression, endotracheal Intubation and other advanced airway management, artificial ventilation,defibrlllation, administration of advanced cardiac Iife support drugs and related emergency medical procedures. A physician's order dated [DATE] included Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNR). However, a progress note dated [DATE] included Please note, this writer was informed that patient was found unconscious without a pulse/respirations, at 1657…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated when opened. The deficient practice could result in a potential for food borne illness. Findings include: A freezer observation on June 28, 2023 at 7:15 a.m. revealed vegetable patties and raw chicken not covered, labeled or dated. A refrigerator observation on June 28, 2023 at 7:20 a.m. revealed potatoes, lemons and oranges not labeled or dated. Additionally, 2 oranges were observed to exhibit a fuzzy, grayish substance on the outside of the orange. The discolored oranges were present in a box of oranges. The kitchen manager removed the two oranges and stated that she generally reviews refrigerator contents once a week after deliveries. A box of shredded carrots was observed to be stored in the refrigerator with a use-by date of June 24, 2023. The kitchen manager stated that these should have been removed but had been missed. An interview with the dietary supervisor, staff # 65 was conducted on June 28, 2023 at 12:40 p.m. Staff # 65 stated that she reviewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-07-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the area around the dumpsters was free of refuse/garbage. The deficient practice could result in an unsanitary condition and the harborage of pests and insects. Findings include: An observation on June 29, 2023, revealed trash strewn in front and to the side of both outside dumpsters. Meatballs and what appeared to be mashed noodles were observed directly in front of the first dumpster, as well as to the side of the first dumpster. Small milk cartons and sausages were observed to the immediate left of the second dumpster. Staff # 65 identified the milk cartons as facility milk cartons utilized for residents. An interview with the dietary supervisor, staff # 65 was conducted on June 28, 2023 at 12:40 p.m. Staff # 65 stated she inspects the outside garbage containers at least daily and also relies on kitchen staff to report any adverse refuse conditions. An interview with the administrator, staff # 115 was conducted on June 6, 2023 at 12:29 p.m. He stated that the expectation was that the outside…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ