Park Avenue Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 156 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 85.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 149.9 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, records review, policy review, and the SA Complaint Tracking System the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to one resident (#5) to prevent injury/accident. The deficient practice could result in harm and injury. Findings include: Resident # 5 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of vascular dementia, restlessness and agitation, and senile degeneration of brain. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The assessment also included that the resident used a wheelchair and can independently wheel 150 feet in a corridor or similar spaces. The history and physical note dated July 6, 2024 included that the resident had assessments of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), cachectia, mutism and dementia. A psychotherapy evaluation dated July 21, 2024 released the resident had major depressive disorder,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical record, the State Agency (SA) complaint portal, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure the facility investigation and medical record were complete and accurate for one resident (#2), and regarding an incident of abuse. The deficient practice could result in care team members not being adequately informed regarding the status of the resident and lead to missed or delayed care.Findings include:Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include generalized muscle weakness, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with nonunion, other specific joint derangements of the right hip not elsewhere classified, and acute pain due to trauma.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated Resident #2 completed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scored a 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact.The SA complaint portal received an allegation related to Resident #2 being abused by a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, review of clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure infection control policies were followed during therapy sessions for five residents (#44, #45, #55, #180, and #181). The deficient practice could lead to spread of infection.Findings include:An observation was conducted on August 21, 2025, at 10:10 a.m. of a group therapy session occurring in the first-floor lounge room. Residents #44, #45, #55, #180, and #181 were present in the lounge, and being led in various therapy activities by a Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA/ staff #100). There was no hand sanitizer or handwashing station/sink or sanitizing agents such as spray or wipes observed in the lounge room. The PTA removed an ankle weight off of a female resident in a wheelchair and set the ankle weight on a chair without sanitizing it. The PTA did not sanitize or wash his hands. Then, the PTA picked up the ankle weight off of the chair and without sanitizing it, placed the ankle weight on Resident #44's leg. The PTA did not wash or sanitize his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that the catheter bag was covered for one resident (#176). The deficient practice could result in resident not being treated with dignity and respect.Findings include:Resident #176 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included acute kidney failure, elevated white blood cell count, depression, and dysphagia.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The assessment also included that the resident had an indwelling catheter.The indwelling catheter care plan initiated on July 30, 2025, included interventions to position the catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from the entrance room door. There was no evidence of a cover on the catheter bag. During an observation that was conducted on August 19, 2025, at 1:22 p.m., Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, facility documentation and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that a change of condition, for one resident (#3) out of 3 sampled, was immediately reported to the physician. The deficient practice could result in clinically adverse outcomes for the resident.Findings include:Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including muscle weakness, difficulty walking, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, fluid overload, essential hypertension, pneumonia, acute on chronic systolic congestive heart failure, nonrheumatic mitral valve disorder, edema, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pleural effusion, sepsis and dyspnea.A review of discharge MDS (minimum data set) dated January 28, 2024 did not show evidence of a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score, but did document that there were no potential indicators of psychosis or no evidence of behaviors.A review of the progress notes revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse was reported to the state agency for one of of three residents. The deficient practice could further endanger the resident and impede an investigation.Findings include:Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic pain, fibromyalgia, dependence on supplemental oxygen, dementia without behavioral disturbance, insufficient sleep syndrome and post-traumatic stress disorder.A review of the annual MDS (minimum data set) dated May 4, 2025 revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 01, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The total mood severity score noted was a 9, indicating mild depression. There were no noted potential indicators of psychosis or behaviors noted.An encounter note dated July 14, 2025 in the electronic health record revealed that in light of current accusations and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 14 sampled residents (Resident # 28) was free from abuse by another resident (Resident # 23). The deficient practice could result in other residents being abused. Findings include: -Regarding Resident (#23) Resident (#23) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia and altered mental status. A nursing note dated August 10, 2022 at 9:52 p.m., revealed that Resident (#23) was hallucinating stating she was going to die because she was told by two ladies that the building was falling down. The note also indicated that the Resident (#23) was combative towards staff and yelling in the hallway. A nursing note dated September 10, 2022 at 3:38 a.m. revealed Resident (#23) was very combative with staff and threatening to kill a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). A nursing note dated September 22, 2022 at 7:12 p.m., indicated staff attempting to administer eye drops and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with the resident's care plan for one resident (#34) regarding administration of scheduled medications as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice has the potential to result in residents not receiving necessary antibiotic treatment as planned, placing them at increased risk for unresolved infections and adverse health conditions. Findings include: Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Traumatic Brain Injury, seizures, sepsis, and Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus (MSSA) infection. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident had was cognitively intact. A review of the physician's orders, dated September 28, 2022, revealed Resident #34 was to take Cefazolin Sodium…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that care and services related to pressure ulcers was provided for two residents (#535 and #537). The deficient practice resulted in lack of thorough pressure ulcer assessments and/or identifying wound deterioration timely. The facility census was 101 and the sample was 22. Findings include: -Resident # 535 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of osteomyelitis, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, muscle weakness, dysphagia, pressure ulcer of sacral region, Stage 4, Type 2 DM, encephalopathy, bacteremia, idiopathic aseptic necrosis of unspecified toes, and nutritional anemia. Review of the clinical record revealed that there were three ulcers present upon admission on [DATE], that included: -Coccyx pressure ulcer, stage 4 -Left heel pressure ulcer, deep tissue injury (DTI) -Left outer foot pressure ulcer, non-stageable. A care plan dated [DATE] revealed the resident had diabetes mellitus and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure the resident representative was notified after a change in condition for one resident's (#537). The deficient practice could result in resident representative not notified and the required decisions for the resident are not made. The facility census was 101, and the sample was 22. Findings include: Resident #537 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of ESRD (end stage renal disease), muscle weakness, diabetes, hemiplegia/hemiparesis related to cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. The care plan initiated on February 9, 2021 revealed the resident had a pressure ulcer or potential for pressure ulcer development, coccyx, related to poor mobility. Interventions included to assess/monitor/record wound healing; to report improvements and declines to the doctor; and, to monitor/document/report to doctor as needed (PRN) changes in skin status: appearance, color, wound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-19 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, policy and procedures review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#68) was free from restraint. The deficient practice could result in harm to a resident secondary to restricted mobility of extremities. Findings include: Resident #68 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of muscle weakness, cerebral infarction, pruritus, end stage renal disease, aphasia and flaccid hemiplegia affecting the left side. Review of the clinical record revealed the resident had an order for a DPM (Dr Pillow Mattress) mattress to enhance boundary awareness. The nursing progress note dated March 13, 2023 included resident was scratching and opening skin with fingernails; and that, the resident had a glove on right hand and still managed to break skin open. The quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) a score of 0, indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The assessment included was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$25,116 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $25,116 — penalty dated 2024-08-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ