Sunview Respiratory and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.75 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 127 beds and averages 109.6 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.47 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.75 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to protect the resident's (#444) right to be free from sexual abuse by another resident (#3) on March 18, 2025 . when R3, an adult was found performing a sexual act on R444, a minor. The facility failed to specifically to (1) address R444's inappropriate interactions with staff; (2) provide supervision when the minor was noted to spend time with a cognitively impaired resident; and, (3) identify sexual contact between a minor and an adult as sexual abuse. When a minor has been the victim of molestation or statutory rape it has the potential to cause long lasting effects, psychological trauma and post traumatic stress disorder. As a result, the situation of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) were identified. Due to the potential for serious psychosocial harm an immediate jeopardy was called in the presence of the Administrator, Clinical Resource (staff #315) and Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-04-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse for one resident (R)444 when (1) Staff failed to identify non consensual sexual acts between R444 and R3 as sexual abuse; (2) Report the abuse within the time frame required by State law and federal requirements; and, (3) Conduct a thorough investigation. The failure of the facility to recognize non consensual sexual acts between minors and adults has the potential to put all minors in the facility at risk for serious psychosocial harm such as post traumatic stress disorder or psychological trauma. As a result, the situation of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) were identified.An immediate jeopardy was called in the presence of the Administrator, Clinical Resource (staff #315) and Director of Operations (staff #316) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on April 3, 2025 at 12:08 p.m.The facility's removal plan was accepted on April 3, 2026 at 5:29 p.m. and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents. The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving appropriate care and treatment that they need. Number of residents sampled: 104.Findings include:The PBJ (Payroll-Based Journal) Staffing Data Report revealed that the facility consistently triggered for excessively low weekend staffing for all three quarters in 2025 and, the 1st quarter of 2026. Per the report, submitted weekend staffing data was excessively low.The facility assessment reviewed on May 7, 2026 revealed that the facility was licensed to provide care for 127 residents, had an average daily census of 108. Average census for short stay residents is 13, for long-stay residents is 117, including an average of 30-40 residents with vent/trach and/or dialysis needs, and the facility averages 65 admission and discharge per month.Reviewed the facility assessment staffing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, review of records and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were discarded for 1 (Resident #109) of 104 residents. The deficient practice could result in adverse drug reactions.Findings include:Resident #109 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: seizures, atrial fibrillation, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and hypertensive heart disease without heart failure.The order summary revealed an order dated September 9, 2025 for Ativan Solution 2 MG/ML (Lorazepam) with instructions to inject 1 ml intramuscularly every 6 hours as needed for seizure activity. Further review of the order summary revealed an order status of discontinued with no end date indicated.During an observation of the Central Section medication storage room on May 7, 2026, at approximately 10:57 a.m., the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-03 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, records, and policy review, the facility's QAPI program did not show it is actively addressing all care and services for residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: (1) Conduct a root cause analysis to identify why the sexual abuse incident between residents occurred; (2) Clearly define the problem or outline specific actions to fix it, including measurable goals, timelines, how effectiveness would be evaluated, and who is responsible; (3) Identify specific changes to policies, procedures, or practices that were or will be put in place; and, (4) Set up ongoing monitoring with clear baselines, target goals, and timelines. Because of these gaps, the facility did not implement clear corrective actions or provide appropriate staff training, which may lead to weak systems for identifying, assessing, and responding to potential sexual abuse incidents.Findings include:Review of the Quality Improvement Plan/Action Plan dated May 20, 2025 revealed the item/problem identified was that minors were admitted to the facility. Causal factor included lack of communication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was reported in accordance with federal requirements when the facility failed to (1) Report the allegation of abuse to the State Agency, local law enforcement, adult protective services and department of children services immediately but no later than within 2 hours; (2) Failed to provide an accurate 5 day report; and, (3) Take appropriate corrective actions for one of one resident (R)#444 investigated for alleged sexual assault. The deficient practice resulted in the facility putting residents at for further abuse and placed the residents at risk for harm. Findings include: A facility self-report dated May 19, 2025 submitted to the State Agency (SA) by the former Director of Nursing (DON/Staff #66) revealed that on May 19, 2025, a staff member overheard Resident #444 made a statement that suggested he received sexual acts from Resident #3. According to the report,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was thoroughly investigated for two residents (#444 and #3). The deficient practice could result in an allegation of sexual abuse not being investigated timely and/or possible ongoing abuse of a resident.Findings include:A facility self-report dated May 19, 2025 submitted to the State Agency (SA) by the former Director of Nursing (DON/Staff #66) revealed that on May 19, 2025, a staff member overheard Resident #444 made a statement that suggested he received sexual acts from Resident #3. According to the report, both residents were determined to be cognitively intact and had a BIMS score of 15; and that, during separate interviews, each resident acknowledged the encounter, asserted it was consensual, and that it occurred on May 18, 2025. Further, the report included that staff had previously witnessed residents #444 and #3 together but reported that there was no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, resident interviews, facility documentation, and policies and procedures, the facility failed to protect one resident's (#2) right to be free from physical abuse by another resident. The census was 110. The deficient practice could result in continued abuse, and further abuse of other residents Findings include:-Resident #2 (alleged victim) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit, need for assistance with personal care, dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, alcohol use, dizziness and giddiness, and anxiety.The cognition care plan initiated on September 14, 2023 revealed that the resident was at risk for impaired cognitive function/dementia. Interventions included to monitor, document, and report any changes to physician.The communication care plan initiated on September 26, 2023 revealed that the resident is at risk for communication problems due to hearing deficit.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0836 — pattern
  Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, and policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that a request for a modification of a health care institution was approved by the state agency prior to establishing a dialysis center and provided dialysis treatment(s) from March 1, 2024 through March 07, 2025 to 9 residents (#17, 10, 13, 15, 8, 20, 4, 6, and 11) inside the facility. The deficiency may result in non compliance with federal, state, and local laws and professional standards. Findings include: During the complaint survey conducted March 7, 2025 through March 7, 2025, an initial request for documentation was made which included copies of dialysis contracts, the facility's modified license for in-house dialysis services, license for the contracted dialysis provider, and a list and schedule for all residents receiving in-house dialysis services from the contracted dialysis provider. On March 7, 2025 at 11:18 a.m. an interview was conducted with Administrator/Staff #8 who…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-18 · tag F0554 — pattern
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff and resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication were not left at bedside for two residents (#62 and #71) who were not assessed to be clinically appropriate to self-administer medications. The deficient practice could result in medication not administered correctly or medication not taken by the resident. Findings include: -Resident #62 was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pleural effusion, and pneumonia. The comprehensive care plan included that the resident was at risk for adverse reaction related to polypharmacy black box warning, was prescribed with an opioid, required anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation, was on diuretic therapy. Intervention included to administer medication as ordered. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that care and services was provided to related to a change in condition for one resident (#168); and, failed to ensure failed to ensure the leg rests for tilt-in-space mobility device was put on for one resident (#31) as recommended. The deficient practice could result in the resident's medical needs not being met/treated appropriately and in a timely manner. Findings nclude: -Resident #168 was admitted on [DATE] from the hospital with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection, pneumonia, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), urinary tract infection, and pneumonia. Review of a care plan initiated on February 9, 2023, revealed the resident was at risk for impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to new environment and recent hospitalization and had an ADL (activities of daily living) Self Care Performance Deficit related to limited mobility. Interventions included to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food items were dated when opened; failed to ensure food readily available for resident use were not expired; and, failed to ensure that the ceiling air vents above the food tray line and the kitchen ice machine were clean. The deficient practices increase the potential for foodborne illness. Findings include: -Regarding food storage and expired food items: A kitchen observation was conducted on September 15, 2024 at 8:24 a.m. and revealed the following food items found in the refrigerator were beyond their use by date: -A bag of grated parmesan cheese with a use by date of September 13, 2024; -An opened bag of lettuce salad secured with a tie, with a use by date of September 13, 2024; and, -Two additional bags of lettuce salad with a use by date of September 13, 2024. An observation of the first unit refrigerator was conducted on September 15, 2024 at 8:48 a.m. There were 7 small cartons of milk with a use by date of September 13, 2024. The following food items were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$62,621 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $62,621 — penalty dated 2026-03-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ