No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Garden View Post Acute Rehabilitation

14475 Garden View Lane, Baldwin Park, CA 91706 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 97 certified beds · (626) 962-7095 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (626) 962-7095 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0605) — most recent Feb 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
1640 Puente Ave
Pharmacy
3250 Big Dalton Ave · (626) 814-4790 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3250 Big Dalton Ave · (626) 404-4088 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.0%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.4%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.0%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.5%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.4%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.8%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.7%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.4%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.8%10.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.3%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.0%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.7%93.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.4%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.5%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.092.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.231.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 261 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.58U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.30hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.27hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.9%CMS range 49.9–63.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 8.0–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge67.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.6%CMS range 7.4–13.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.451.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.45
RN hours/ resident / day
1.24
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.65
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.34
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
39.6%
Total nursing turnover
0.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 89.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.34 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.55 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-27)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-10)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to readmit one of ten sampled residents (Resident 1) to the first available bed in a private room when the General Acute Care Hospital 2 (GACH 2) contacted the facility regarding Resident 1's readmission to the facility on 3/10/2026. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 remaining in GACH 2 from 3/10/2026 through 5/7/2026, a total of 59 days, following an inquiry from GACH 2 for Resident 1 to be readmitted to the facility. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia (an infection that inflames the sacs in one or both lungs), respiratory failure (lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or fail to remove carbon dioxide), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive, long-term lung disease). During a review of Resident 1's History & Physical (H&P, physician assessment and evaluation of the resident), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor one of ten sampled residents (Resident 6) in accordance with facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Change in Condition, after discovering an incident on 5/4/2026 that involved Resident 6 and Resident 7. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 6 receiving inadequate care and had the potential to negatively affect Resident 7's psychosocial well-being. a. During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, dated 5/6/2026, the admission Record indicated Resident 6 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated Resident 6's diagnoses included morbid obesity (a chronic disease in which a person weighs 100 pounds or more over his/her ideal body weight), acquired absence of right leg above the knee (the surgical removal of the right leg starting somewhere above the kneecap), and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 6's History and Physical Examination (H&P - a physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for two of two sampled residents (Residents 1 and 50). These failures had the potential to result in Residents 1 and 50 not receiving care or receiving delayed services to meet the residents' needs and could result in a fall or injury. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including difficulty walking, history of falling, displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur (broken hip occurring at the top of the right thigh bone), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body). During a review of Resident 1's Fall Risk Evaluation (FRE- method of assessing a patient's likelihood of falling) dated 1/19/2026, the FRE indicated Resident 1 had one to two falls in the past three months, was bedbound and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and care screening too) reflected accuracy of assessments for two of two sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 106) by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 5 was coded in the MDS dated [DATE] taking Rivaroxaban (anticoagulant-blood thinner).b. Ensure Resident 106 was coded in the MDS dated [DATE] as discharged home with home health. These deficient practices resulted in inaccurate reporting to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS, a federal agency that administers the Medicare program and works with state governments to administer the Medicaid and health insurance portability standards) agency and had the potential to negatively affect the resident's care planning and services. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including essential hypertension…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary treatment to prevent pressure ulcer (PU/PI - an injury that breaks down the skin and underlying tissue when an area of skin is placed under pressure) development and promote healing for three of four sampled residents (Residents 7, 9, and 46) by failing to: a. & b. Ensure the low air loss mattress (LALM - a specialty bed that alternates pressure to help heal and prevent pressure injuries) for Residents 7 and 9 were set to alternating pressure and set correctly to the residents' weights. c. Ensure the LALM was set correctly for Resident 46's weight. These failures had the potential to cause pressure ulcers, worsen, and prevent healing for residents with skin and pressure injuries. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection), Diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services in accordance with physician's order and to implement its Policy and Procedure (P&P) on fall management for two of three sampled residents (Residents 6 and 72) by failing to:a. Ensure cushion alarm (safety device designed to alert caregivers immediately when a person at risk of falling would stand up or leave a seated/lying position) for Resident 6 was connected in bed and in the wheelchair.b. Ensure Resident 72 was provided with adequate supervision and had an environment free of accident hazards. These failures placed Residents 6 and 72 at risk for injury from fall and recurrent falls.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same site of the body), hemiparesis (partial muscle weakness or reduced strength on one side of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct competencies for two of five sampled staff (Certified Nurse Assistant 4 (CNA 4) and Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2). These failures had the potential for the residents in the facility not to receive appropriate nursing care and services from CNA 4 and LVN 2.Findings: During a concurrent record review and interview on 2/26/2026 at 10:20 am with the Director of Staff and Development (DSD), CNA 4's employee file was reviewed. The DSD stated CNA 4 was a full-time employee in the facility since 11/11/2024. The DSD stated CNA 4 did not have a skills competency on file for 11/2025. The DSD stated, skills competency should be done yearly to ensure staff understand the tasks assigned and remain competent in providing care and treatment for the residents. The DSD stated, staff competency should be completed by the DSD for all CNAs and the Director of Nursing (DON) for all licensed nurses upon hire and annually, thereafter. During a concurrent record review and interview on 2/26/2026 at 10:20 am with the DSD, LVN 2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — pattern
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dental care and services to two of three sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 72) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Quality of care.This failure had the potential to result in the residents' poor oral health and reduce quality of life.Findings:During a review of Resident 3's face sheet, the face sheet indicated Resident 3 had an initial admission on [DATE] with the diagnoses but not limited to; hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body), hemiparesis (partial weakness or reduced strength on one side of the body), muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing).During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 12/30/2025, MDS indicated Resident 3 needs substantial/maximal assistance when performing oral hygiene and personal hygiene.During a review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 66) was assisted with eating at eye level and called by Resident 66's legal (official name recognized by government on documents), proper and preferred name. These failures had the potential for Residents 66 to lose dignity and individuality.Findings: During a review of Resident 66's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 66 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including parkinsonism (brain conditions that cause slowed movements, stiffness, and tremors), asthma (a chronic lung disease that causes inflammation and muscle tightening of the airways, making it harder to breathe), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 66's Order Summary (OS), the OS indicated Resident 66 had an active order for a no-added salt fortified diet, pureed texture meals with thin liquids, ordered on 11/7/2025. During a review of Resident 66's History &…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and clean areas for residents.This failure had the potential to negatively affect the residents' quality of life.Findings:During a review of the facility's map, it was noted that the facility has four shower rooms, three nurses' stations (north, center, and south), and two medication rooms located in the center and south stations.During a concurrent observation and interview conducted on 2/25/2026 at 8:50 am with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 in the shower room near the north nurses' station, CNA 1 reported that most residents follow a shower schedule and that nursing assistants and housekeeping staff are responsible for cleaning the shower rooms. The shower room adjacent to resident rooms in the north station had an exhaust fan with a protective grill that was visibly covered with dust.During an interview on 2/26/2026 at 2:05 PM with Infection Preventionist and Maintenance, Maintenance stated the exhaust fan removes excess moisture inside the shower room and cleaning it helps prevent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its facility's Policy and Procedures (P&P) on the use of cushion pad alarms (safety devices designed to alert caregivers immediately when a person at risk of falling stand up or leave a seated/lying position) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 12). This failure placed Resident 12 at risk of injury and psychological distress related to the use of cushion pad alarms. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 12 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness (decrease or loss of strength), osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones), and anxiety (an emotion characterized by feelings of tension, worried thoughts, and physical changes). During a review of Resident 12's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 1/23/2026, the MDS indicated Resident had moderately impaired cognition (ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of six sampled residents' (Resident 108) order for Remeron (a medication to treat depression [a feeling of severe sadness or hopelessness]) included a specific indication for a specific diagnosed condition and the hours of sleep was monitored, as indicated in the facility's policy titled Chemical Restraints and Psychotropic (medications that alter chemical levels in the brain which impact mood and behavior) Medication Management. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the use of unnecessary psychotropic drug, which may result in significant adverse (harmful) consequences to Resident 108.Findings: During a review of Resident 108's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 108 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression (a feeling of severe sadness or hopelessness) and polyneuropathy (damage or disease affecting peripheral nerves featuring weakness, numbness, and burning pain). During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update the resident's care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 72).This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 72's safety and prevent the provision of necessary care.Findings:During a review of Resident 72's face sheet, the face sheet indicated Resident 72 had an initial admission on [DATE] with the diagnoses but not limited to: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) , protein-calorie malnutrition , essential hypertension (high blood pressure ) , fracture of right pubis , a history of falling and need assistance with personal care.During a review of Resident 72's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) dated 12/29/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 72 is dependent on lying- to-sitting on side of the bed and had history of fall on admission and fracture related to a fall prior to admission.During a review of Resident 72's Clinical admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide required assistance during activities of daily living (ADLs - activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 51).This failure placed Resident 51 at risk of physical injury during bed mobility and overall decline in quality of life.Findings: During a review of Resident 51's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down, including legs, and arms), left hand contracture (a stiffening/shortening at any point, that reduces the joint's range of motion) and cerebral palsy (condition that affects how the person moves and controls their muscles) During a review of Resident 51's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 2/2/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 51 had severely impaired cognition (ability to understand and process information). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for a resident with indwelling catheter (also known as foley catheter {FC}, a tube that allows urine to drain from the bladder into a bag that is usually attached to the thigh) in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) on urinary catheter care for one of four sampled residents (Resident 46). This failure had the potential for Resident 46 not to receive care or receive delayed care and treatment for urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in the bladder/urinary tract). Findings: During a review of Resident 46's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 46 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including pressure ulcer of sacral (large, triangular bone at the base of the spine) region, stage 4 (ulcer that extends into the muscle and bone and causing extensive damage), pressure ulcer of right heel, retention of urine, and acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for gastrostomy tube (GT - a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition/medication directly to the stomach) site in accordance with the physician's order for one of one sampled resident (Resident 51). This failure had the potential for complications related to tube feedings for Resident 51.Findings: During a review of Resident 51's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down, including legs, and arms), left hand contracture (a stiffening/shortening at any point, that reduces the joint's range of motion) and gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings/medication to be administered directly to the stomach). During a review of Resident 51's untitled Care Plan (CP) dated 2/19/2024, the CP indicated Resident 51 had a tube feeding related to dysphagia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of seven sampled residents (Resident 109) was free from significant medication error by failing to administer Morphine Sulfate Contin (MS Contin- controlled medication used for pain) Oral Tablet Extended Release (ER-long acting) 15 milligrams (mg- unit of measurement) at the correct administration time. The medication was administered too early than the ordered scheduled time of administration. This failure had the potential to place Resident 109 at risk for adverse side effects related to overdosing, such as lethargy, respiratory depression (slow breathing and carbon dioxide retention) and hypotension (low blood pressure).Findings: During a review of Resident 109's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cutaneous abscess (pocket of pus in the skin from an infection) of the left upper arm and pain in the left shoulder. During a review of Resident 109's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation , interview and record review , the facility failed to maintain medication related equipment and storage areas in a clean and appropriate manner, resulting in the presence of contaminated equipment and unsecured, loose medication pills in the medication room.This deficient practice had the potential to cause contamination, medication errors, and unsafe conditions for residents.Findings:During a review of the facility's map, it was noted that the facility has four shower rooms, three nurses' stations (north, center, and south), and two medication rooms located in the center and south stations.During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/26/2026 at 1:15 pm with Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) 1 in the center station medication room, crackers were observed stored inside one of the medication room cabinets, and a can of insect repellent spray was observed on top of the cupboard in close proximity to medications. Five unidentified loose medication pills were found on the floor next to the medication destruction container. RNS1 stated food items should not be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and follow infection prevention procedures to prevent the transmission of infectious organisms for one of four sampled residents (Resident 80) by failing to ensure the resident's nasal cannula (NC- a flexible tube with two small prongs that sits in the nostrils to deliver oxygen) was not touching the floor. This deficient practice had the potential to result in infection to Resident 80. Findings: During a review of Resident 80's AR, the AR indicated Resident 80 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food or liquids) and gastrostomy status (a surgical procedure used to insert a tube, often referred to as a G-tube [GT], through the abdomen and into the stomach for medication/feeding). During a review of Resident 80's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 80's cognitive (ability to think and reason) skill for daily decision making…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide and maintain dignity for two of two sampled residents (Residents 138 and 238) by failing to: a. Close Resident 138's privacy curtain and Resident 138's body was exposed and can be seen from the hallway. b. Close Resident 238's privacy curtain and Resident 238's upper extremities were exposed when Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDSN) checked the resident's surgical site. These deficient practices violated Residents 138 and 238's right to privacy. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 138's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 138 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control) and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 138's History and Physical (H&P, a formal assessment that a doctor performs for information about a patient's health) dated 11/28/2024, the H&P indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of residents' needs for four of four sampled residents (Residents 13, 20, 39, and 57). For Residents 13, 20 and 57, the call light (device that allows the resident to request assistance from nursing staff) was not within reach. For Resident 39, the resident did not know how to use the call light and the purpose of the call light was not explained to the resident. These failures had the potential for the residents not to receive care or receive delayed services to meet the residents' needs and could result in a fall or injury. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 13's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 13 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for residents with indwelling catheter (including Foley Catheter- a soft flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine, nephrostomy tube- a thin, flexible tube that drains urine from the kidney into a bag outside the body, and suprapubic catheter- a catheter inserted through a hole in the abdomen and then directly into the bladder) in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) for four of five sampled residents (Residents 19, 26, 32 and 78) by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 19's Foley Catheter (FC) tubing was kept secured and monitored for the presence of white sediments (visible particles) in the urine. b. Ensure Resident 26's Suprapubic Catheter (SC) tubing was kept secured and the suprapubic catheter site dressing clean and dry. c. Ensure Resident 32's Nephrostomy Tubes (NT) were covered with a privacy bag and positioned lower than the bladder. d. Ensure Resident 78's FC was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its Policy and Procedure (P&P) on the use of bedrails (a bar that runs along the side of a bed) and grab bars (a bar or loop that helps the resident move in and out of the bed) for two of two sampled residents (Residents 33 and 51) by failing to: a. Ensure the use of appropriate alternatives to grab bars were attempted and did not meet the needs of the resident before its installation for Resident 51. b. Ensure the use of appropriate alternatives to bedrails were attempted and did not meet the needs of the resident. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the use of siderails was consented before its installation for Resident 33. These failures placed Residents 33 and 51 at risk for entrapment and injury from the use of bedrails or grab bars. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 51's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included displaced fracture…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure on infection control by failing to: a. Ensure one of one Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 2) wore the required personal protective equipment (PPE, clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) while providing care for a resident on enhanced barrier precaution (EBP, a set of infection control practices that use PPE to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs}]) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 34). b. Follow infection prevention guidelines for Resident 62 on Enhanced Barrier Precaution on 1/8/2025 when one of one Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 4) entered Resident 62's room without donning/wearing the required PPE prior to checking the resident's gastrostomy tube (G-tube, feeding tube that is inserted into the stomach) placement for medication administration. c. Ensure one of one Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 6)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an effective communication method for one of one non-English speaking sampled resident (Resident 138). This failure had the potential for Resident 138 not to receive necessary care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 138's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 138 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control) and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 138's History and Physical (H&P, a formal assessment that a doctor performs for information about a patient's health) dated 11/28/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 138 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 138's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 11/30/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 138 had clear speech, had the capacity to understand others and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazard for one of two sampled residents (Resident 40) by failing to ensure Resident 40's bed was in the lowest position. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 40 at risk for recurrent fall with injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 40's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction that occurs when there's an imbalance of chemicals in the blood), muscle weakness, Parkinsonism (movement disorder), end stage renal disease (condition when the kidneys can no longer function on their own), gout (a type of arthritis[swelling of the joints]) and need for assistance with personal care. During a review of Resident 40's Care Plan (CP) titled, At risk for Falls related to multiple Medical Conditions, initiated on 7/29/24, the CP indicated Resident 40 was at risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label the nasal cannula (NC) tubing (an oxygen delivery device) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 64). This failure had the potential to result in infection for Resident 64. Findings: During a review of Resident 64's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure (lungs cannot adequately provide oxygen to the body) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 64's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 12/6/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 64 had clear speech, had the ability to understand others and usually made self understood. The MDS indicated Resident 64 was dependent (helper does all of the effort) for toilet hygiene and chair/bed-to-chair transfer. During a review of Resident 64's Order Summary Report (OSR) for 1/2025, the OSR indicated Resident 64 was ordered continuous oxygen via NC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act upon the consultant pharmacist's medication regimen review (MRR, a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences associated with medication use) recommendation for one of five sampled residents (Resident 40). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 40 to receive unnecessary medication and adverse (harmful) consequences related to medication therapy. Findings: During a review of Resident 40's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 40 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression disorder (persistent feelings of sadness and worthlessness and a lack of desire to engage in formerly pleasurable activities) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 40's Physician's Order (PO) dated 7/29/2024, the PO indicated Resident 40 was prescribed Ondansetron (medication to prevent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and document specific indication for the use of Mirtazapine (antidepressant- medication to treat depression [mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest and can interfere with daily functioning]) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 20) as indicated in the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medications This deficient practice had the potential to result in unnecessary psychotropic drug use which could result in significant adverse (harmful) consequences to Resident 20. Findings: During a review of Resident 20's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Spondylolisthesis (a condition where a vertebra in the spine slips out of place) and major depressive disorder (persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). During a review of Resident 20's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep an electric fan (a powered machine used to create a flow of air to cool and ventilate rooms and control humidity) in a safe, operating, and sanitary condition for one of one sampled resident (Resident 4). This failure had the potential to affect Resident 4's quality of life and health. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF, a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently) and asthma (a condition in which a person's airways become inflamed, narrowed, and swollen). During a review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 10/30/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 4 had severely impaired cognition (ability to understand). The MDS indicated Resident 4 was dependent (helper did all of the effort, resident did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a resident-centered comprehensive care plan (CP - a document that describes a resident's needs and how the nursing home will meet them) for one of three residents (Resident 1) by failing to ensure Resident 1 had a care plan for Resident 1's oral/dental status. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive the care and services needed to address Resident 1's edentulous (the complete loss of all natural teeth) mouth. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of left cerebral vascular accident (CVA - a medical condition that occurs when blood flow to the brain is suddenly interrupted), type 2 diabetes (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) received proper treatment and care for foot health by failing to arrange Resident 1's consult with a podiatrist (a medical professional who specializes in the diagnosis and treatment of foot, ankle, and lower limb disorders) in a timely manner. This failure resulted in a delay of the provision of foot care and treatment for Resident 1 which could result in podiatric complications. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of left cerebral vascular accident (CVA - a medical condition that occurs when blood flow to the brain is suddenly interrupted), type 2 diabetes (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 1's untitled care plan (CP) dated 8/11/24, the CP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to provide information regarding Advance Directives (AD, legal document that provide instructions for medical care which go into effect when a person becomes disabled) to two of two sampled residents (Resident 82 and 47). This deficient practice had the potential for facility staff to provide care and treatment against the resident's will. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 82's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 82 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and hemiplegia and hemiparesis (hemiplegia is paralysis of partial or total body function on one side of the body, hemiparesis is onesided weakness, but without complete paralysis). During a review of Resident 82's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care screening tool) dated 12/8/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 82 had clear speech, sometimes understood others, and sometimes made self-understood. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Low Air Loss Mattress (LAL mattress, a pressure reducing device that helps prevent skin breakdown) settings for four of four sampled residents (Residents 68, 66, 31 and 32) were carried out as ordered by the physician and/or as recommended by the manufacturer. a. For Resident 68, the facility failed to ensure the LAL setting was according to the resident's weight as ordered by the physician and as recommended by the manufacturer. b. For Resident 66, the facility failed to ensure the LAL setting was according to the resident's weight as ordered by the physician and as recommended by the manufacturer. c. For Resident 31, the facility failed to ensure the LAL mattress setting was accurate. d. For Resident 32, the facility failed to ensure the LAL mattress setting was accurate. These deficient practices had the potential to worsen Residents 68 and 31's pressure ulcer (lesion/wound caused by unrelieved pressure that results in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazard for two of four sampled residents (Residents 50 and 32) by failing to: a. Utilize bilateral landing mats for Resident 50 who had history of fall, as ordered. b. Ensure Resident 32's pad alarm ( a pad placed under a resident while on the bed and sends an alarm to alert staff when the resident gets up from pad) was turned on while the resident was in bed for fall prevention, as ordered. These deficient practices had the potential to result in serious consequences of fracture (break in the bone) and/or bleeding that may accompany a fall. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 50's admission record indicated, the facility admitted Resident 50 on 6/18/2021 with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning), difficulty in walking, muscle weakness and history of falling.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR, an attempt to decrease or discontinue) for two of five sampled residents (Residents 55 and 41) in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure titled, Psychotropic Drug Use. a. There was no GDR completed for Resident 55 who received Remeron (a medication to treat depression [a feeling of severe sadness or hopelessness]) with no symptoms of depression for 11 months. b. There was no GDR completed for Resident 41 who received Risperdal (a medication to treat schizophrenia [mental disorder characterized by abnormal social behavior and failure to understand what is real]) since 1/21/2021. This deficient practice resulted in Residents 55 and 41 receiving psychotropic (drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medication without adequate clinical reason for use and had the potential to result in adverse consequences for Residents 55 and 41. Findings: During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control program practices were implemented for two of two sampled residents (Residents 41 and 20), by failing to: a. Ensure the facility administered antibiotics (medicine that fights infection) to Resident 41 with adequate indication for its use. For Resident 41, the criterion was not met for the use of antibiotics based on Mc Geer's criteria (the criteria that define infections for surveillance purposes were selected to increase the likelihood that the events captured by application of the definitions are true infections). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 41 to develop antibiotic resistance (when bacteria/germs develop the ability to defeat medications designed to kill them). b. Ensure Resident 20's indwelling catheter (known as Foley catheter, a tube that allows urine to drain from the bladder into a bag that is usually attached to the thigh) tube did not touch the floor. This deficient practice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for one of one sampled resident (Resident 65) who was at risk for fall by failing to ensure Resident 65's call light was within reach as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure titled, Call Light, and Resident 65's plan of care. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 65 not to receive and/or receive delayed assistance when needed that could potentially result in falls and/or accidents. Findings: During a review of Resident 65's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 66 on 9/5/2023, with diagnoses that included muscle weakness and need for assistance with personal care. During a review of Resident 65's untitled care plan initiated on 9/6/2023, the care plan indicated Resident 65 was at risk for fall related to history of falls. The care plan interventions included for the nursing staff to be sure the call light was within reach and encourage Resident 65 to use the call light to call for assistance as needed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 14) reviewed for communication/sensory was assessed accurately. For Resident 14, the admission assessment for hearing was not accurately assessed to reflect Resident 14's hearing problem. This deficient practice had the potential risk for Resident 14's hearing problem not identified and worsen. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission record, the admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Acute Myocardial Infarction (permanent damage to the heart muscle due to inadequate oxygen supply), Type II Diabetes Mellitus (high levels of sugar in the blood) with Diabetic Neuropathy (a complication of diabetes that affect the nerves that control movement, sensation and other functions), and unspecified epilepsy (brain disorder in which a person has repeated seizures [convulsions] over time). During a review of Resident 14's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an effective communication method to one of one non-English speaking sampled resident (Resident 185). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 185 to not be able to express needs which may result in Resident 185 not receiving necessary care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 185's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 185 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (hemiplegia is paralysis of partial or total body function on one side of the body, hemiparesis is one sided weakness, but without complete paralysis) and difficulty walking. During a review of Resident 185's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care screening tool) dated 12/30/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 185 had clear speech, usually understood others, and usually made self-understood. The MDS indicated Resident 185 was dependent (helper does all of the effort) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 14) reviewed for communication/sensory was provided necessary treatment and/or services for resident's difficulty in hearing. Resident 14 had problems with hearing and was not addressed. This deficient practice had the potential risk for Resident 14's hearing problem to get worse. Cross reference F641. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission record, the admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Acute Myocardial Infarction (permanent damage to the heart muscle due to inadequate oxygen supply), Type II Diabetes Mellitus (high levels of sugar in the blood) with Diabetic Neuropathy (a complication of diabetes that affect the nerves that control movement, sensation and other functions), and unspecified epilepsy (brain disorder in which a person has repeated seizures [convulsions] over time). During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor the presence of white sediments (visible particles in the urine that may contain red or white blood cells, casts, bacteria, fungi, parasites in the urine that could indicate infection or dehydration [fluid deficit]) in the urine for one of five sampled residents (Resident 22) with indwelling catheter (foley catheter - a tube inserted in the bladder to drain urine into a drainage bag), as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure, titled Catheter Drainage Bag and the resident's care plan for foley catheter. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 22 to not receive care or delayed care and treatment for urinary tract infection (UTI, condition in which bacteria invade and grow in any part the urinary system). Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 22 on 8/22/2022 with diagnoses that included personal history of UTI, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (the nerves and muscles don't work…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure correct oxygen flow rate was administered to one of one sampled resident (Resident 25) This deficient practice had the potential to result in complications associated with oxygen (odorless and colorless reactive gas) therapy (treatment that provides extra oxygen to breathe in). Findings: During a review of Resident 25's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/11/2023, with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure (a condition when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood). During a review of Resident 25's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 8/5/2023, the MDS indicated the resident had no cognitive (ability to understand and process information) impairment and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing and personal hygiene. During a review of Resident 25's recapped Physician Orders dated 12/30/2023, the order indicated for Resident 25 to receive oxygen at 2 l/min via…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-19 · tag F0710 — pattern
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to supervise medical care by a licensed physician according to the facility ' s policy and procedure (PP) titled, Physician Services, for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: 1. Ensure Medical Doctor 1 (MD 1) provided care after attempting to be notified by RN 1 and RN 2 to resume Resident 1 ' s home medications in a timely manner for the following medications: a. Xarelto 20 (medication to treat and prevent blood clots (an important process that prevents excessive bleeding when a blood vessel is injured]) milligram (mg, unit of measurement) by mouth one time a day for atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heartbeat). b. Rhopressa Ophthalmic Solution eyedrop (medication to treat loss of vision), instill one (1) drop in both eyes at bedtime for glaucoma (nerve connecting the eye to the brain is damaged). c. Prolensa eyedrops (medication to treat dry eyes, swelling, or pain in the eyes) 0.07 percent (%, one part of every hundred),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-01-10 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to post actual number of nursing staff who worked on 1/2/2025, 1/3/2025, 1/5/2025 for one of one sampled Nursing Station. This failure resulted in inaccurate information to the residents and family members and had the potential to affect the quality of care provided to the residents. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/8/2025 at 5:14 PM with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the facility's nurse staffing information forms (NSI) were reviewed. The NSI's indicated the following: On 1/1/2025 on the 10:30 PM to 6:30 AM (night) shift, five Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) worked instead of six. On 1/2/2025 on the 6:30 AM to 2:30 PM (morning) shift, 16 CNAs worked instead of 14. On 1/3/2025 on the morning shift, 13 CNA's worked instead of 14. On 1/5/2025 on the night shift, 7 CNA's worked instead of 6. The DSD stated the number of staff who worked, and the actual hours worked were not accurate. The DSD stated the risk of not posting accurate staffing information was that it would not reflect the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LEET, RYANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
SINGH, JHUJHARIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
WILLITS, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/01/2023
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/08/2022
GAMERO, ALICIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/01/2023
KEETCH, CHADIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2011
SATO, AMIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/09/2024
PORT, BARRYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/28/2025
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/02/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 30%Other / private 7%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$460per resident / day
operating cost
$13,974per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$512per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055187. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next