No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

South Bay Post Acute Care

553 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (619) 426-8611 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (619) 426-8611 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
450 4th Ave · (619) 422-6158 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
340 4th Ave. #1 · (619) 422-9291 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
183 Broadway · (619) 754-4951 · Call to confirm hours
Park
251 4th Ave · (619) 851-4083 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.0%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.1%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.3%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms63.4%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.5%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.3%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.3%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.0%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.7%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.0%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.8%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.3%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.5%11.2%12.0%worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 221 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

64.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
80.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.60U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.27hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 80.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 128 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.60 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF64.2%CMS range 59.6–70.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.1%CMS range 9.7–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge80.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge76.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge62.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified88.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.7%CMS range 3.5–9.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.95
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.39
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.69
RN hoursweekends
40.6%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 93.3 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.23 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.47 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

0
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-08)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2022-11-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician (MD) ordered wound care treatments for pressure ulcer ((localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) were implemented as directed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). As a result, Resident 1's pressure ulcer on the sacrum (the base of the spine or simply the bottom of the back) increased in size and placed Resident 1 at risk for worsening skin integrity, potential infection, delayed healing, and further complications related to pressure ulcer progression.Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] (initial admission 2/8/26-2/24/26) with diagnoses which included history of Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). A record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- nursing facility assessment tool) dated 3/26/26 indicated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide clear indications (a valid reason to use a certain medication) for two of three sampled residents ' (Resident 1 and Resident 2) controlled pain medications (medications with high abuse potential). As a result of this deficient practice, Resident 1 and Resident 2 were at risk of receiving unnecessary controlled pain medications which may lead to misuse. Findings: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis which included cellulitis (a skin infection) of the right leg per facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 1 ' s physician ' s orders dated 3/21/25, indicated: · Oxycodone HCL Oral Tablet (a type of strong pain reliever that could be habit-forming if not used exactly as prescribed) 5 MG (milligrams). Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for moderate pain level 4-6 (pain scale that utilize numbers used to evaluate a person ' s perceived pain level). · Oxycodone HCL Oral Tablet 5 MG…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately document a pain assessment result and controlled pain medication (medications with high abuse potential) administration in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). As a result of this deficient practice, Resident 1 ' s MAR did not accurately reflect the care and treatment provided to the resident. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis which included cellulitis (a skin infection) of the right leg per facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 1 ' s physician ' s orders dated 3/21/25, indicated: · Oxycodone HCL Oral Tablet (a type of strong pain reliever that could be habit-forming if not used exactly as prescribed) 5 MG (milligrams). Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for moderate pain level 4-6 (pain scale that utilizes numbers used to evaluate a person ' s perceived pain level). · Oxycodone HCL Oral Tablet 5 MG…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident ' s (Resident 2) controlled medications were secured and disposed of after discharge to the hospital. This deficient practice had the potential to result in drug diversion. Findings: Review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] to facility with diagnoses including: Sepsis (widespread infection), Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (Difficulty breathing), and Opioid (pain medication) Dependence. Review of Resident 2 ' s Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated that Resident 2 received Hydromorphone HCL (Narcotic Pain Medication) 3 x 8 Milligrams(MG) tablets every 6 hours for Chronic Pain and Alprazolam(Anti-anxiety medication) and 1x O.5 MG tablet once a day in the morning for anxiety. On 1/9/24 at 10:30 A.M., an interview with Administrator (ADM) was conducted. ADM stated facility investigation found the following: All of Resident 2 ' s medication were held in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff promptly answered resident call lights and met resident's needs in a timely manner for two residents interviewed on the initial tour of the facility and three of seven residents from the confidential group interview. This failure could potentially affect these residents' physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 42 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 (on a scale of 0-15, with 15 being the most cognitively intact), according to the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) assessment, dated 9/28/22. This MDS assessment also indicated Resident 42 required extensive assistance with bed mobility. During an interview with Resident 42 on 11/14/22 at 3:18 P.M., the resident stated that it took 30-40 minutes for staff to answer the call light on some night shifts. Resident 42 stated the long wait time had been on the weekends, but not all the time. Resident 42 stated she had called to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-21 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all staff were trained regarding behavioral health. Only 17 licensed nurses were in-serviced according to the in-service sign-in sheet. As a result, there was a potential for staff to not have the knowledge to care for residents with behavioral health issues. Findings: An interview was conducted on 11/16/22, 9:52 a.m., with CNA 5. CNA 5 stated she was currently caring for a resident with diagnosis of post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a mental condition that is triggered by a terrifying event). CNA 5 stated she did not receive training regarding how to care for residents who have PTSD. An interview was conducted on 11/21/22 at 9:50 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD). The DSD stated she was unsure if trauma training had been provided to staff. The DSD stated all staff including housekeeping, and maintenance should receive training on behavioral health to avoid triggering a resident's trauma. A record review of the facility's In-service Attendance Record, titled, Trauma & Informed Care/ Behavioral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not assure staff assisted Resident 66 in timely manner to maintain continence (ability to control movements of the bowels and bladder). As a result, Resident 66 became incontinent (lost control of bowel or bladder) and felt as if she had been ignored and disrespected. Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 66 was admitted on [DATE]. Per Resident 66's brief mental status exam on the quarterly assessment, dated 9/23/22, the resident had the capacity to make decisions about her care. On 11/16/22 at 3:53 P.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 66. Resident 66 stated a couple of weeks ago on the evening shift, she had to wait to go to the toilet, but could not wait and ended becoming incontinent. Resident 66 stated she asked three CNAs for help, and they all said they were busy. Resident 66 stated she had to wait 30 minutes and felt as if people were ignoring her. Resident 66 stated I kept saying, excuse me, excuse me can you take me to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-21 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration assessment was accurate for one of one resident (Resident 33) reviewed for self-administration of medication. This failure increased the potential for the unsafe self-administration of medications, and the duplication of administered medications for Resident 33. Findings: Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Congestive Heart Failure (CHF - a serious condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as efficiently as it should), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), and Asthma (a condition in which a person's airways become inflamed, narrow, swollen, and produce extra mucus, which makes it difficult to breathe), per the History & Physical, dated 2/10/22. On 11/14/22 at 9:16 a.m., Resident 33 was observed in her bed laying on her left side with a nebulizer (a drug delivery device used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Congestive Heart Failure (CHF - a serious condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as efficiently as it should), per History & Physical, dated 2/10/22. During observation and interview on 11/14/22, at 12:27 p.m., Resident 33 was in her room having lunch. Resident 33 stated she had no teeth but had dentures that were lost 3 months ago. Resident 33 stated she informed the head nurse and was told they will look for them. On 11/17/22, at 10:27 a.m., CNA 4 was interviewed. CNA 4 stated Resident 33 had dentures but refused to wear them. CNA 4 stated Resident 33 had no problems chewing. CNA 4 stated if a resident had missing dentures, she would report it to social services. CNA 4 stated she had not seen Resident 33 wear her dentures in the last 2 weeks. CNA 4 stated she never asked Resident 33 the reason for not wearing her dentures. On 11/17/22, at 10:42 a.m., a joint interview and record review of an undated Inventory of Personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-21 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review Level II (PASRR II - an evaluation of the resident's psychiatric treatment requirements) was followed up and completed for one of one resident (Resident 17) reviewed for PASRR. As a result, there was potential for a failure to coordinate the PASRR recommendations to Resident 17's assessment and care planning. Findings: Resident 17 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Schizoaffective Disorder (a mental illness that is marked by a combination of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations or delusions, and mood disorder symptoms, such as depression or mania), Post-Traumatic Disorder (PTSD - a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event), and Major Depressive Disorder (a mental disorder characterized by pervasive low mood, low self-esteem, and loss of interest or pleasure in normally enjoyable activities),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update or revise care plans for two of three residents reviewed for care planning (8, 78). This failure had the potential to result in delayed care, miscommunication among caregivers, and decreased physical well-being of the residents. Findings: 1. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (a disorder causing memory problems and impaired reasoning) and muscle weakness, per the facility admission Record. On 11/14/22 at 11:19 A.M., a concurrent observation and record review of Resident 8 was conducted. Resident 8 was in bed, with a fall mat (a protective pad) on the floor next to the bed. The Resident Matrix (a document used to identify care needs) indicated Resident 8 had fallen within the past 90 days. According to a review of Resident 8s IDT (Interdisciplinary Team, a group of healthcare professionals), Resident 8 had fallen twice within the last year. On 5/1/22 Resident 8 was found on the floor,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-21 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a plan for discharge for one of four residents reviewed for care planning (Resident 49). This failure had the potential to result in an unsafe discharge, and placed Resident 40 at risk for prolonged admission to the facility. Findings: Resident 49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include muscle weakness, per the facility admission Record. On 11/14/22 at 11:51 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 49. Resident 49 stated she had been at the facility almost a year, but still had no plans for discharging. Resident 49 stated she would like to be discharged back to her previous neighborhood but nobody had discussed finding her a place to live. According to Resident 49's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool, dated 9/1/22), Resident 49's score was 15, indicating intact cognition. On 11/30/21, an IDT met for Resident 49's initial care conference. Per the IDT, Resident 49's plan for discharge was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed provide treatment and care according to professional standards of practice when: 1. The need for a PRN (provided as needed) medication was not assessed for one of one residents reviewed for constipation (Resident 36), and 2. A physician's order to assist a resident up in a chair daily was not followed for one of three residents reviewed for care planning (Resident 49). 3. Blood sugar level checks were not performed before meal intakes for one of 3 residents reviewed for diabetes (a disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired) care. These failures had the potential to place the residents at risk for further medical complications. Findings: 1. Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility admission Record. On 11/14/22 at 1:13 P.M., a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 36 was conducted. Resident 36 was sitting in a wheelchair in her room, rubbing her abdomen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a toilet seat was securely attached to the toilet bowl in a communal bathroom used by multiple residents. As a result, multiple residents were at risk for falls due to the instability of the loose toilet seat. Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with difficulty walking. Resident 83's records were reviewed. Per the physician's history and physical, dated 10/17/22, Resident 83 had the capacity to make her own decisions. On 11/13/22 at 11:50 A.M., an observation and interview with Resident 83 was conducted. Resident 83 was sitting up on the side of her bed. Resident 83 stated she did not have a bathroom in her bedroom, so she used the bathroom down the hall, Resident 83 stated the bathroom was used by several residents on the hall. Resident 83 stated the toilet seat moved from side to side and when she tried to sit on it, she was afraid of falling because it threw her off…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-21 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of one residents (31) on intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy had their PICC line monitored per professional standards and facility policy. A PICC line is a peripherally inserted central catheter that provides access to the large vein carrying blood to the heart to administer medication for long-term use. This failure could potentially increase the risk of infection and delay the identification of catheter-related complications for Resident 31. Findings: Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included infective endocarditis (a bacterial infection that settles in the heart) and bacteremia (bacteria in the blood), per the facility's admission Record. During an interview with Resident 31 on 11/14/22 at 10:30 A.M., the resident stated he was receiving antibiotics through the IV in his arm because he had an infection in his blood. An IV site was observed in the resident's right upper arm, with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for oxygen therapy was followed for one of one resident (Resident 33) reviewed for respiratory care. As a result, Resident 33 was provided with more oxygen than what the physician ordered, which had the potential to cause respiratory problems for the resident. Findings: Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Congestive Heart Failure (CHF - a serious condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as efficiently as it should), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), and Asthma (a condition in which a person's airways become inflamed, narrow, swollen, and produce extra mucus, which makes it difficult to breathe), according to the History & Physical, dated 2/10/22, and the Order Summary Report. On 11/16/22, at 4:31 p.m., a concurrent observation of Resident 33's oxygen concentrator (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents reviewed for dialysis (a process to remove waste products from the blood) had a dressing removed as ordered by the physician (Resident 36). This failure had the potential to cause damage or injury to the dialysis site. Findings: Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dependence on renal dialysis (a need for dialysis due to kidney failure), per a facility admission Record. On 11/14/22 at 3:03 P.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 36. Per Resident 36, dialysis was scheduled on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. Resident 36 stated the nurses usually removed the dressing from her dialysis access site when she returned at night. On 11/16/22 at 9:37 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 36. Resident 36 stated she had returned from dialysis the previous night. Resident 36 stated the night nurse did not remove the dressing from her access…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure behaviors related to the use of an antipsychotic was accurately monitored for one of 5 residents (Resident 33) reviewed for unnecessary use of psychotropic medications. As a result, Resident 33's documented behavior showed an increase in behavioral episodes which could potentially result in inappropriate dosing of the antipsychotic medication. Findings: Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that is marked by a combination of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations or delusions, and mood disorder symptoms, such as depression or mania), and bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), according to Resident 33's face sheet. An interview was conducted with CNA 1 on 11/14/22, at 12:15 p.m. CNA 1 stated Resident 33 preferred to sleep in and not eat breakfast until she wakes up. CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care conference documentation was accurate for one of 20 resident (Resident 33) reviewed for accurate medical record. This failure did not provide an accurate representation of the care provided to Resident 33 and had the potential to cause confusion amongst care providers. Findings: Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Congestive Heart Failure (CHF - a serious condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as efficiently as it should), according to the History & Physical, dated 2/10/22, and the Order Summary Report. An interview and joint record review was conducted with the SSD on 11/17/22 at 11:22 a.m. The SSD stated that a care conference was scheduled for Resident 33 on 11/7/22. The SSD stated the care conference was canceled by Resident 33's daughter and was scheduled for a later date. The SSD reviewed the IDT (Interdisciplinary team - a coordinated group of professionals from several different…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During observation and interview on 11/14/22, at 2:52 p.m., CNA 3 was observed coming out of room [ROOM NUMBER] and carried a urinal filled with urine, while both hands were gloved. CNA 3 held the urinal with his right hand and closed the door to room [ROOM NUMBER] with his left hand. CNA 3 proceeded to enter the hall restroom and came out holding the urinal with his left hand. CNA 3 turned the doorknob with his right hand to enter room [ROOM NUMBER]. An interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP) on 11/21/22, at 3:34 p.m. The IP stated staff used the restroom across the hall for room [ROOM NUMBER]. The IP stated he trained staff not to use gloves in the hallway. The IP stated he trained staff to use a barrier on holding a urinal. During a review of the facility's undated P&P, titled, Infection Prevention-Control of Transmission of Infection, the P&P indicated, It is the policy of this facility to implement infection control measures to prevent the spread of communicable diseases and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility did not clarify one of two residents' (287) wishes for life sustaining treatment. This failure created the potential for Resident 287 to receive life sustaining treatment not according to his wishes. Findings: On 11/11/18, Resident 287 was admitted to the facility with chronic kidney disease (Kidney Failure) per the facility admission Record. On 11/26/18, Resident 287's record was reviewed. Per hospital History and Physical, dated 11/6/18, Resident 287 declined dialysis (the process of cleaning the blood through a machine). Per admission physician's orders, dated 11/11/18, Resident 287 was DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). Documentation of Resident 287's wishes regarding life sustaining treatment was absent from the record. The facility did not complete a POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) until 11/21/18. On 11/26/18 at 3:34 P.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 287. Resident 287 stated he did not want any hospitalization, just comfort measures. On 11/26/18 at 4:40 P.M., the MRD stated the facility did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, one of four residents (28) received treatment for a pressure ulcer (injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) without a physician's order. This created the potential for Resident 28 to receive unsafe care. Findings: On 1/21/16, Resident 28 was admitted to the facility with a diagnoses which included hemiparesis (paralysis of one side of the body) following a stroke affecting the right dominant side per the facility admission Record. On 11/27/18 at 2:17 P.M., a concurrent observation of Resident 28's skin and interview with CNA 8 was conducted. CNA 8 stated Resident 28 did not have any skin issues. Resident 28's buttocks and tailbone (base of spine) area was observed with CNA 8. A Duoderm patch (used to treat pressure ulcers) was placed over the resident's tailbone area. On 11/27/18 at 2:25 P.M., a record review and interview was conducted with LN 10. LN 10 reviewed Resident 28's treatments and stated there were no orders for treatment to the buttocks and tailbone area. On 11/27/18 at 2:37…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers and hair washing for one of two sampled residents (187). This failure had the potential for the resident to experience psychological stress and compromised hygiene. Findings: Resident 187 was admitted to the facility of 11/21/18 with diagnoses to include muscle weakness, per the admission Record. On 11/26/18 at 12:19 P.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 187 and his wife. Per Resident 187, his wife came in each morning to change his sheets and wash him in the bathroom. Resident 187 stated he had not washed his hair since admission, and he felt bad his wife had to help him. He also stated when his wife asked about washing his hair, the CNA responded to go ahead, but made no accommodations to assist her, and did not provide supplies. Per Resident 187's wife, the CNA never informed them of a shower room where hair could be washed while accommodating the resident in a wheelchair. On 11/29/18 at 9:09 A.M., a concurrent interview and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and manage pain for two of four residents investigated for pain management (24, 20). As a result, the deficient practice had the potential for unmanaged pain. Findings: 1) Resident 24 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (total or partial paralysis of one side of the body) affecting the right side, per the facility admission Record. An observation on Resident 24 was conducted on the following dates. - On 11/26/18 at 8:27 A.M., and at 9:24 A.M., Resident 24 was sleeping in bed lying on his back. At 9:47 A.M., Resident 24 was awake, lying on his back. At 1:16 P.M., and at 4:54 P.M., Resident 24 was noted lying at a 45 degree angle. - On 11/27/18 at 7:24 A.M., and at 3 P.M., Resident 24 was observed sleeping lying on his back. - On 11/28/18 at 9:01 A.M., Resident 24 was awake lying on his back. On 11/27/18 at 3:56 P.M., an interview with CNA 11 was conducted. CNA 11 stated Resident 24 was totally dependent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure dialysis (the process of cleaning the blood through a machine) care was given according to professional standards of practice for two of five residents (287, 186). This practice created the potential for: 1. Resident 287's temporary access site (central line located in the right upper chest) and AV fistula (artery and a vein surgical connection created for dialysis treatment) to become infected and for the AV fistula to clot. 2. Resident 186's access site to clot. Findings: 1. On 11/11/18, Resident 287 was admitted to the facility with Chronic Kidney disease (Kidney Failure) per the facility admission Record. On 11/26/18 at 10:57 A.M., an observation of Resident 287 was conducted. Resident 287 had a slightly reddened surgical site with sutures located in the left upper arm. Per Resident 287, the surgical site was an AV fistula, and until the AV fistula was healed, the temporary access site on his chest was to be used for dialysis.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-29 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to individualize behavioral interventions for one of three residents (43). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 43's safety being compromised. Findings: Resident 43 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dementia (impaired memory) with behavioral disturbances, per the facility admission Record. On 11/29/18 a record review was conducted. Resident 43's MDS, dated [DATE], section C, indicated he had a BIMs of 9 meaning the resident had moderately impaired cognition. The MDS, section G, indicated Resident 43 ambulated with limited assistance. Resident 43's Fall Committee IDT note, dated 11/17/18, the resident had a fall on 11/15/18. The note indicated the resident had periods of severe confusion, was getting up unassisted, and did not use his call light to request assistance. Per the note, nursing interventions implemented to prevent falls included, .continue to remind to use his call light for staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (20) reviewed, received anti-anxiety medications for an approved indication and behaviors. As a result, Resident 20's distress was not accurately assessed or treated. Findings: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility admission Record with diagnoses to include dementia (impaired memory) and contracture (shortening or stiffening of muscles which causes deformity) of multiple sites. On 11/26/18 a record review was conducted. Per the history and physical note, Resident 20 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. Per a physician's order, dated 11/6/18, Resident 20 was to receive Xanax (an anti-anxiety medication) and be monitored for episodes of anxiety as evidence by calling out during care. On 11/26/18 at 9 A.M., Resident 20 was observed lying quietly in her bed. On 11/26/18 at 9:27 A.M., an interview was conducted with CNA 13. CNA 13 stated Resident 20 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-29 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor dietary preferences for one of four residents (78), which resulted in Resident 78 receiving foods she disliked. Findings: Resident 78 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] per the facility admission Record. On 11/26/18, a record review was conducted of Resident 78's EMR. Resident 78 had a physician's order, dated 5/10/18, for mirtazapine (a medication for depression) at bedtime daily for depression. Resident 78 had a physician's order, dated 5/11/18, to monitor for episodes of depression as evidenced by poor appetite. On 11/26/18, at 1:11 P.M., an observation and concurrent interview was conducted in Resident 78's room. Resident 78 was sitting in bed with a meal tray in front of her. Resident 78 stated she was given zucchini and meatballs for lunch. Resident 78 further stated she did not like zucchini, meatballs or meatloaf and that she told facility staff numerous times but continued to receive them. The dietary slip on Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-29 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, one of one resident (28) was not provided adaptive equipment for meals. This failure created the potential for Resident 28 to limit her intake at mealtimes. Findings: On 1/21/16, Resident 28 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of hemiparesis (paralysis of one side of the body) following a stroke affecting the right dominant side per the facility admission Record. On 11/26/18 at 8:43 A.M., Resident 28 was observed lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated 60 degrees. Resident 28's breakfast tray was on the bedside table positioned over the resident's lower torso. Resident 28 was observed using a regular spoon, pushing food across the plate attempting to scoop up food. The food fell off the plate and landed on the tray. On 11/26/18 at 1:02 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 28. Resident 28 stated, My right hand is paralyzed so I can only eat with my left hand. My right side is my dominant side. Resident 28 was observed, for the second time, pushing food with her spoon across the plate and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not implement infection control related to hand hygiene. This practice created the potential for transmission of HAI (healthcare associated infections) to residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: On 11/26/18 at 12:33 P.M., an observation of CNA 13 was conducted. CNA 13 was holding two clear plastic bags with her bare hands. Inside the clear bags were incontinent briefs and wash cloths with brown material on them. CNA 13 went to the utility room and placed the clear bags in a plastic bin. CNA 13 then left the utility room, without performing hand hygiene, and went to the linen closet and took a clean wash cloth. CNA 13 then proceeded to a resident's room, took a pair of gloves from the wall, and went to the resident's bedside, without performing hand hygiene. On 11/26/18 at 12:37 P.M., CNA 13 came out of a resident's room with a clear plastic bag. Inside the bag was a wash cloth with brown stains. CNA 13 took the clear bag to the utility room and placed the bag in a plastic bin, inside the utility room. CNA 13 then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.2+1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 52.8+2.2 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
FAHID, AMIRIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/19/2024
JIMENEZ, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2014
WILLITS, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2017
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/10/2014
KEETCH, CHADIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2011
OH, KATHERINEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2025
SATO, AMIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/09/2024
PORT, BARRYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/04/2025
COLLINGWOOD MANOR NURSING FACILITY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2014
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+15.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 11%Other / private 21%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$391per resident / day
operating cost
$11,892per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$464per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555873. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next