No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cloverdale Healthcare Center

300 Cherry Creek Rd, Cloverdale, CA 95425 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 72 certified beds · (707) 894-5201 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (707) 894-5201 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 13 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
103 Commercial St · (707) 894-5313 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1111 S Cloverdale Blvd · (707) 894-5206 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
421 S Cloverdale Blvd · (707) 894-4300 · Call to confirm hours
Park
42 Cherry Creek Rd · (707) 894-3818 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.8%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.4%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms16.9%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.7%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.4%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.1%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.4%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.9%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.1%10.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.7%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission10.2%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.1%11.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.402.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.731.571.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 174 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

68.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.67U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.32hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.32hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.67 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF68.4%CMS range 58.8–73.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.1%CMS range 6.5–12.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 4.0–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.121.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
1.27
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.74
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.36
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
36.5%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 55.8 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.36 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.74 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.57 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-19)
1
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that controlled drug (medications that the use and possession of are controlled by the federal government) records were documented in sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation for three out of 19 sampled residents when count discrepancies were found for Resident 23, Resident 66, and Resident 32 controlled drugs. This failure has the potential to cause medication errors or diversion of controlled medication.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/18/2025 at 11:31 a.m. during and inspection of a medication cart at the North Hall, Licensed Nurse (LN) 2 confirmed the following discrepancies in controlled medications (drugs regulated by the government due to their potential for abuse, misuse, or dependence): The controlled substance count sheet of Resident 23's Tramadol (a synthetic opioid medication used to treat pain) 50 milligram (mg- unit of measure) tablet indicated 18 tablets should be remaining. LN 2 showed Resident 23's Tramadol 50 mg tablet package had 17 tablets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and records review, the facility failed to ensure medication and supplies were stored in accordance with professional principles for all residents of the facility when:1. 19 dressing change sets (sterile kits containing supplies to change wound dressings), one safety infusion set (sterile medical device used for administering fluids, drugs or drawing blood), one continue-Flo solution set (sterile tubing used for administering fluids and medications into a vein), three 10 ml syringes (medical device used to inject and withdraw fluids from the body), and 19 continuous ambulatory delivery device administration-sets (CADDs- specialized tubing used to deliver fluids and medications at controlled rates) were expired but kept with ready to use supplies in the medication room.2. Two bottles of Aspirin with illegible expiration dates were kept in medication carts.3. An expired allergy relief medication in a plastic container was kept in the South medication cart; and4. 15 loose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and records review, the facility failed to provide the Office of the State Long term Care Ombudsman (Ombudsman- an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities) a copy of the Notification of discharge for one of three sampled closed records (Resident 61) when Resident 61 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]This failure can result in inappropriate and unsafe discharge and deprive Resident 61 of access to an advocate who can provide information of her options and rights. Findings:A review of Resident 61's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated she was admitted to the facility in 11/2025 with diagnosis of above the knee amputation of the left leg.A review of Resident 61's Nursing Progress Notes, dated 12/3/25 at 9:45 AM, indicated the Facility Physician saw Resident 61, determined the resident's leg amputation (stump) looked infected on the underside with a foul smell,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality for two out of 19 sampled residents (Resident 66 and Resident 48) when:1. there was no order for Resident 66's continuous oxygen therapy (provides extra oxygen for peoples whose bodies cannot get enough from the air) at 2- Liters-Per-Minute (LMP, a unit of measurement) via nasal cannula (NC, a common comfortable device with two small prongs that fit into the nostrils to deliver supplemental oxygen or increased airflow for respiratory support).2. Resident 48 was administered insulin Lispro (a rapid-acting, human-made version of human insulin used to manage blood sugar levels) after breakfast.These failures had the potential to risk the health and wellbeing of the affected residents.Findings:1. A review of Resident 66's face sheet indicated admission to the facility in 12/2025 with a diagnosis that included Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure (a condition where the lungs cannot exchange enough oxygen) with Hypoxia (low blood oxygen occurs when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to notify a Responsible Party (RP, a person appointed to make healthcare decisions for a person who is unable) for one resident (Resident 1) of three sampled residents when Resident 1 fell. This failure resulted in Resident 1's RP not knowing Resident 1's pain was a result of the fall. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated admission to the facility in January 2025 with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction due to embolism (the lack of oxygen to the brain due to a blockage in a blood vessel from a blood clot) and cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating caused by brain injury). The admission record also indicated Resident 1's wife was his, Emergency Contact #1. A review of a facility document titled Facility Verification of Informed Consent dated 1/23/25, indicated, [Resident 1] .DOES NOT [check marked as option] have the capacity to understand and consent .If not, see name and phone number of resident's surrogate .[Resident 1's RP signed the document] .Date 1/23/25 .[Physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident when: 1. The facility pharmacist failed to identify a risk for a potential medication administration error for one resident, Resident 144. The medication label on a controlled medication, Hydromorphone (Hydromorphone is used as a pain reliever. Hydromorphone is two to eight times more potent than morphine but shorter duration and greater sedation), was not the indication for use as written by Resident 144's physician. This failure had the potential to result in ineffective pain management or overdosing that could adversely affect the health and safety of Resident 144; and, 2. The facility failed to implement a system to consistently and accurately reconcile its inventory of Fentanyl Transdermal Patches (a potent opioid pain medication that is given and absorbed through the skin), which had the potential to result in medication diversion going unnoticed for an extended amount of time. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 144's, Order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its medication labeling and medication storage policies and procedures, when: 1. One vial and two boxes of medication, which had no prescription labels attached to them, were found among the active supply (current prescription) of medications in the Medication Storage Refrigerator. This failure had the potential to result in administration of the wrong medication to the wrong resident; and, 2. Three liquid medications, which had been previously opened, did not have a label to indicate the date opened and/or any changes to the medication use-by date. These failures had the potential to result in administration of deteriorated medications and increased risk for ineffective treatments, resulting in residents' lower quality of life. Findings: 1. During a Medication Storage Room inspection and concurrent interview with the Infection Prevention Nurse (IP), on 10/17/22, at 10:48 a.m., the IP stated the refrigerator inside the Medication Storage Room was used to store temperature-sensitive medications. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow food safety requirements during food prep and food storage, when: 1. The facility stored flour in the bag it was delivered in, opened in a plastic tub; 2. One Cook, [NAME] E, was not wearing a beard cover for two days; 3. The North nursing unit resident refrigerator contained 15 expired Nutritional supplements; and, 4. The South nursing unit resident refrigerator contained an employee lunch bag in the freezer and an unlabeled/undated pink water pitcher. These failures put residents at risk for consuming food prepared with contaminated flour, hairs falling into resident food, risk for consuming expired nutritional supplements, which could lead to dyspepsia (Dyspepsia is another word for indigestion. People with indigestion often report feelings of stomach pain, over-fullness and bloating during and after eating. Other common symptoms include acid reflux, heartburn, and excessive burping), as well as infection control concerns. Findings: 1. During a tour of the dry storage on 10/17/22 at 10:35 AM, flour,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for one Resident (Resident 41) when: 1) there was no formalized process for nursing to communicate with the RD to provide assessments for residents who had pressure or diabetic ulcers; and, 2) there was lack of inclusion of the RD in relevant patient care committees, in accordance with the approved job description. Resident 41 had a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (Diabetes mellitus refers to a group of diseases that affect how the body uses blood sugar--glucose) and a Pressure ulcer. This failure resulted in a nutritional assessment not being completed, which had the potential to contribute to the wound not healing. Findings: It is estimated that up to 50% of hospitalized patients are malnourished. Malnutrition can lead to longer hospital stays, altered immune function, and impaired skin integrity and wound healing. Malnutrition has been found to be a significant factor influencing pressure injury (PI) risk and wound healing. While PI prevention requires…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was safe for residents and visitors, when a known tripping hazard, located in the parking lot, was not repaired timely. Facility staff were aware of the tripping hazard for more than two months, had purchased asphalt for its repair, and did not execute the repair until after a visitor tripped and fell. This failure: 1) Caused potential for resident falls, and subsequent injury, for one unidentified resident know to wheel himself (in a wheelchair) outside independently (without supervision), 2) Caused potential for resident falls, and subsequent injury, for eight sampled residents (Resident 25, Resident 144, Resident 29, Resident 16, Resident 8, Resident 36, Resident 28, and Resident 39) and six Unsampled residents (Resident 27, Resident 17, Resident 9, Resident 34, Resident 55, and Resident 56), known to ambulate with physical therapy staff inside and potentially outside, the building, and 3) Caused one Confidential Visitor (CV) to trip, fall and sustain injuries while walking through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, one of two sampled Diet Aides was not able to verbalize or demonstrate how to properly test the chemical strength of the sanitation bucket in the kitchen. This failure had the potential for this Diet Aide not to have the correct concentration and would potentially result in ineffective sanitization of food service equipment. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 10/18/22 at 3 PM, Diet Aide H was scooping ice cream. Upon completion of the task, Diet Aide H was asked to describe how surfaces were sanitized. Diet Aide H could not verbalize or demonstrate proper test procedure. The Director of Food Services (DFS) intervened and assisted Diet Aide H to find the correct measuring strips. Diet Aide H stuck the test strip in the solution in the red bucket for 10 seconds, read the strip on the back of the bottle of test strips, which showed Test 400. During a review of the department document titled, Verification of Job Competency-Cooks, dated 9/2/22, for Diet Aide H, it showed she was able to verbalize sanitizing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to puree two food items per the recipe. This failure caused one puree item not to hold its shape and the other to taste grainy. Findings: The International Dysphagia Diet Standardization (IDDSI) Framework July 2019, provides a common terminology to describe food textures. Foods are measured from Levels 3 - 7. Level 4 Pureed Usually eaten with a spoon (a fork is possible) o Cannot be drunk from a cup because it does not flow easily o Cannot be sucked through a straw o Does not require chewing o Should be smooth and can be piped, layered or molded because it retains its shape, but should not require chewing if presented in this form o No lumps o Not sticky o Liquid must not separate from solid. Cohesive enough to hold its shape on a spoon. During a tray line observation on 10/17/22 at 11:40 AM, [NAME] E was pureeing meatballs. [NAME] E stated he could add chicken broth or beef broth if he needed to. He pureed just the meatballs with nothing added. A taste test was conducted, based on surveyor observation of pureed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-01-09 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents' rooms measured at least 80 square (sq) feet (ft) per resident in 14 (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER]. Rooms 7 through 14, and Rooms 19 through 22) of 22 resident rooms in the facility. Findings included: The Client Accommodations Analysis, dated 01/08/2025, revealed the facility had 14 rooms (Rooms 1-2, 7-14, and 19-22) with an approved capacity of four beds that each measured 307.8 sq ft, which yielded a total 76.95 sq ft for reach resident. On 01/08/2025 at 10:02 AM, the Maintenance Supervisor measured the following rooms and confirmed the following dimensions: - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 76.95 sq ft for each resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 76.95 sq ft for each resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 76.95 sq ft for each resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 76.95 sq ft for each resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 76.95 sq ft for each resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.2+1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 52.8+2.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
THE ENSIGN GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/30/2006
GAMBLE, SHAWNDEEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/15/2001
SERRANO, NOELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/01/2006
KEETCH, CHADIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2011
WILLITS, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/15/2025
TWOMAGNETS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/15/2001
PORT, BARRYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/20/2025
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/17/2003
RED BARN LAKESIDE HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$917K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 58%Medicare 32%Other / private 10%

This home reported $917K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$531per resident / day
operating cost
$16,131per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$594per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055756. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next