Courtyard Health Care Center
1850 E. 8th Street, Davis, CA 95616 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 112 certified beds · (530) 756-1800 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (66) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.3% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.2% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.8% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.9% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.1% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.3% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 4.7% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.3% | 93.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.4% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.35 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.48 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 253 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 64.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.4%CMS range 53.4–65.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 8.4–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 64.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 60.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 61.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.0%CMS range 5.2–10.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 105.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.28 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.39 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
66 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-05-24 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 43) received services to maintain mobility when Restorative Nursing Aide services (RNA, provides residents with exercises to improve or maintain mobility and independence) were not provided to Resident 43 as recommended by a Physical Therapist (PT, a healthcare professional who specializes in helping residents improve their physical functioning). This failure resulted in Resident 43 not receiving services to maintain her highest practicable physical level of functioning and psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 43's admission record, indicated Resident 43 was readmitted in December of 2023, with diagnoses which included spinal stenosis (space around spinal cord becomes too narrow and can cause pain or weakness in arms or legs), dorsopathy (disease of the spine), osteoarthritis (joint pain and stiffness), history of falling, muscle weakness, and abnormalities of gait (a manner…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-07-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to meet professional standards of care for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the physician ordered antifungal (a medication used to treat and prevent fungal infections) medication was not administered timely.This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving the prescribed antifungal medication and a subsequent transfer to the hospital emergency room. Findings:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on June of 2026 with a diagnoses which included Encephalitis (inflammation of the brain tissue), Encephalomyelitis (inflammation brain and spinal cord) and Hepatic Encephalopathy (a decline in brain function caused by sever liver disease).A review of Resident 1 Order Summary Report (ORS) indicated, MD [medical doctor] determines that Resident [Resident 1] does NOT have the Mental Capacity to make Healthcare .Order Date 6/17/26.A review of Resident 1 ORS indicated, Itraconazole [a prescription antifungal medication used to treat fungal infections] Oral Solution 10 MG/ML [milligrams per milliliter - unit of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse for one of five sampled residents (Resident 2) when facility staff witnessed Resident 1 hit Resident 2.This failure resulted in Resident 2 not being free from abuse and had the potential for Resident 2 to be harmed. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, Resident 1 had been admitted in June 2022 with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), anxiety (an intense, excessive, and persistent feeling of fear, dread, or uneasiness), and psychosis (a collection of symptoms characterized by a loss of contact with reality).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 4/22/26, Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a tool to assess cognition) score of 0 out of 15, which indicated Resident 1 had severely impaired cognition.During a review of Resident 2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the results of an abuse allegation investigation was reported within the required time frame for one (Resident 1) out of five sampled residents.Failure to report in a timely manner may delay state agency oversight and intervention potentially allowing on-going abuse and placing residents at risk for harm.Findings:Review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted [DATE] with several diagnosis including fracture of the right shoulder and end stage renal failure (a condition where the kidneys can no [NAME] filter waste, balance fluids or maintain electrolytes).Review of SBAR (SBAR-situation, background, assessment, a recommendation-a communication tool used by healthcare workers when there is a change in condition among residents) notes dated 4/13/26, the SBAR indicated, Resident and her roommate were in the lobby. Roommate was to load up for dialysis, and she was on the phone. They began cussing at each other. When resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure corrective action was taken to protect residents from abuse for two of six sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when:The facility did not report the results of all investigations to California Department of Public Health (CDPH) within 5 working days for Resident 1 and Resident 2, andThe facility did not do an assessment of Resident 2 after abuse allegations.These failures had the potential to result in ongoing abuse for Resident 1 and Resident 2.Findings:1.During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in September 2025 with multiple diagnosis including surgical aftercare. During a review of Resident 2's Face, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with multiple diagnosis including respiratory failure.During a review of the facility's incident reports received by CDPH on 1/26/26 and 1/28/26 respectively, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported within the required timeframe for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 reported to nursing staff that she was injured by facility staff during patient care. This failure of timely reporting had the potential to cause a delayed response by enforcement agencies to ensure resident safety. During a review of Resident 1's face sheet (a document containing patient information), Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in August 2025 with multiple diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease (decreased kidney function), Schizophrenia (mental health condition that affects how people think, feel and behave), and Bipolar Disorder (mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 1/21/26, indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. During a review of a facility's investigation document titled, 5 Day Summary from Abuse Investigation from Resident allegation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store clean dishes in a sanitary manner for a census of 109 residents, when: 1. A dirty dish with half-eaten food on it was found on the shelves of clean dishes; and 2. A hot water jug stored in the clean dish area was found with dark brown residue on it. These failures decreased the facility's potential to prevent foodborne illness among vulnerable residents.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/29/25 at 10:32 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM) in the facility's kitchen, a half-eaten food item in a dirty cup was observed on a clean dish storage shelf. The cup was placed next to clean dishes used by residents. DM confirmed the dirty cup with half-eaten food was not supposed to be left in the clean dish storage area. DM further stated cross contamination could have been an issue as well as pest control. 2. A review of an admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in June 2023. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool), dated 2/26/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow a therapeutic diet plan to one of three sampled residents (Resident 2), when Resident 2 was served a hard to chew chicken burger at lunch. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 2's nutritional status.Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses including moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (a condition that occurs when a person does not consume enough protein to meet their body's needs), dysphagia (a medical condition characterized by difficulty swallowing), and adult failure to thrive (a condition characterized by a significant decline in weight, muscle mass, and overall health in adults). A review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool), dated 7/23/25, indicated Brief Interview of Mental Status score was 15 out of 15 with intact cognition. During an observation on 9/29/25 at 1:20 pm for the B-unit lunch tray pass, Resident 2's tray contained a burger bun with a large, breaded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food in a sanitary manner for a census of 108 residents, when:Clean Utensils were found with food particles and water residuals and utensil holders had multiple small black particles; andDietary Aide 3 (DA 3) did not wash hands before handling clean kitchenware.These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illness among vulnerable residents.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/8/25 at 11:05 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM) and Registered Dietician (RD), the kitchen's utensils and utensil holders were observed. Multiple small black particles were observed on the utensil holders. Three forks and three spoons had food particles and water residuals. DM and RD confirmed six utensils were dirty and stated clean utensils should have no food particles on it. DM further stated it was unsafe to use uncleaned utensils for residents.2. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/8/25 at 12:28 p.m. with DA 3, DA 3 was manually washing the kitchenware (containers) with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide proper care for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when:1.Resident 1's assessments (including vital signs) were inaccurate; and,2.The Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated no evidence that Resident 1's antibiotic was given timely as ordered.These failures resulted in an adverse outcome wherein Resident 1 was admitted to acute care for hospitalization for severe sepsis (a life-threatening condition due to an infection) with septic shock (severe form of infection, life threatening condition, occurs when the body's immune system overreacts to an infection, leading to a drop in blood pressure and organ failure.)Findings:During a review of Resident 1 admission record (AR - official documentation that records details of a person's entry to the facility)), indicated, Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility 9/12/20, and was re-admitted [DATE] with new diagnosis including septic shock.During a review of Resident 1's Skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) discharged appropriately when:1. Final discharge instructions were not reviewed with the Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA-a legal document that gives one person the authority to make medical decisions for another person),2. Resident 1 was discharged without needed supplies (tube feeding formula and a glucometer),3. Discharge orders were to discharge home with home health; however, Resident 1 was discharged to a board and care, and4. No clinical evaluation was completed for Resident 1 to determine discharge needs and/or discharge potential.These failures placed Resident 1 at risk for potential harm due to inadequate discharge planning, lack of continuity of care and an increased risk of deterioration in the resident's health status resulting from absence of appropriate clinical oversight. Findings:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included metabolic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 55 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate discharge for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when 1. The facility did not follow physician discharge orders;2. The 30-day notice of discharge was given to Resident 1 at time of discharge; 3. The facility failed to develop post discharge care follow up for a June neurology referral; 4. There was no physician discharge summary in the medical records; and5. Minimum Data Sheet (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) discharge assessment was incomplete and not submitted. These failures led to inappropriate discharge of Resident 1 from the facility and reduced the facility's potential in discharging Resident 1 safely.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in April 2025 with diagnoses that included benign neoplasm of cerebral meninges (brain tumor), cognitive communication deficit, and symptoms and signs involving cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 eloped from the facility and failed to implement interventions per facility policy.This failure reduced the facility's potential in keeping Resident 1 safe from harm.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in April 2025 with diagnoses that included benign neoplasm of cerebral meninges (brain tumor), cognitive communication deficit, and symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness. Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment.During a review of Resident 1's Speech Therapy Discharge summary, dated [DATE], the speech therapy notes indicated that Resident 1 .[had] difficulty following directions. [Resident 1] requires max [maximum] cues.memory impaired [decline in the ability to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food preferences were accommodated for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3), when:Resident 1 did not receive double portions of protein;Resident 2 did not receive salad; andResident 3 did not receive fresh fruit for lunch on 7/8/25 as listed in the meal tickets.These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' nutritional status.Findings:1. A review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated she was admitted to the facility in 6/23 with diagnoses including anemia (the body does not have enough red blood cells to carry oxygen effectively throughout the body) and vitamin D deficiency (not enough vitamin D).A review of Resident 1's meal ticket, dated 7/8/25, indicated Resident 1 had double the portion of protein listed in the preference list. During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review on 7/8/25 at 12:28 p.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1's meal ticket, dated 7/8/25, was reviewed. Double portion of protein was listed in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary condition for a census of 109 residents, when:Two boxes of 48 cups of four ounces (oz, a unit of measurement) of yogurt were left in the kitchen floor at room-air for more than three hours; andThe freezer's temperature was not monitored on 7/7/25 in the evening shift.These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness among residents.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/8/25 at 11:15 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM), 20 boxes of fresh vegetables, fruits, milk, yogurt, eggs, and meat were in the kitchen floor at room air. DM stated the food products' delivery arrived today.During an interview on 7/8/25 at 11:40 a.m. with Dietary Aid (DA), DA stated the food products were delivered to the kitchen around 10 a.m.During an observation on 7/8/25 at 1:13 p.m., two boxes of 48 cups (four oz per cup) of yogurt were in the kitchen floor at room air temperature.During an interview on 7/8/25 at 1:35 p.m. with DM, DM confirmed the fresh produces were delivered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the rights to be free from abuse for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1) when staff witnessed Resident 2 hitting Resident 1 ' s hand. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing abuse including physical pain and emotional distress. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in March 2016 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) affecting the right side. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 3/5/25, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had no memory impairment. During a review of Resident 1 ' s SBAR (situation, background, assessment, recommendation- a communication tool used by healthcare workers when there is a change of condition among the residents) Form, dated 4/25/25, the SBAR indicated Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents, rights to personal privacy and confidentiality of their personal and medical records when 16 resident meal tickets were left unattended in the facility's memory unit dining area. This resulted in the facility's failure to protect the residents' rights to personal privacy and confidentiality of their personal and medical records relating to sensitive information about residents' names, allergies and therapeutic diets. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/16/25 at 1:14 p.m. in the Memory Unit with Registered Dietician (RD), observed resident meal tickets left unattended on a table in the Memory Unit. RD stated, They shouldn't be out there. Should be taken to shredder. HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) violation. Those are the meal tickets for the residents for memory unit dining. During an interview on 04/17/25 at 12:41 p.m. with DON, DON stated, That's HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) if meal tickets are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided according to accepted professional standards of clinical practice when: 1. The licensed nurse (LN) did not administer medications in a timely manner for Resident 16, Resident 19, Resident 37, Resident 59 and Resident 71. 2. The LN did not check the residents' identity and did not explain the medications administered for (Resident 15, Resident 23, Resident 222, and Resident 102) and; 3.The Licensed Nurse failed to follow physician orders for continuous gastrostomy feeding for Resident 18 for a census of 104. These failures had the potential to result in medication errors and for Resident 15, Resident 16, Resident 18, Resident 19, Resident 23, Resident 37, Resident 59, Resident 102 and Resident 222 not meeting their highest practicable well-being. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 16's admission Record (AR, front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-18 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow scheduled mealtimes comparable to mealtimes in the community and in accordance with resident preferences for five of 33 sampled residents (Resident 81, Resident 94, Resident 30, Resident 69 and Resident 3). This failure resulted in residents' dissatisfaction with their meals and had the potential for decreased food intake leading to unplanned weight loss and nutritional deficiencies. Findings: Review of Resident 81's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 81 was admitted in early June 2023 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes with hypoglycemia (a condition that makes it difficult to control blood sugar and with episodes of low blood sugar). Review of Resident's 81's Minimum Data Set (MDS-A federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 1/15/25, the MDS indicated Resident 81 had moderately impaired cognition (mental process of acquiring understanding and knowledge). During an interview on 4/15/25 at 12:28 p.m., with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food service staff adhered to current standards of practice for food service safety when: 1. Staff failed to label, date, and monitor refrigerated and frozen food when expired food was found in 2 out of 4 refrigerators, food without expiration dates were found in 2 out of 4 refrigerators and 2 out of 3 freezers, and temperature logs were incomplete for 4 out of 4 refrigerators and 3 out of 3 freezers; 2. The facility failed to keep non refrigerated foods in a clean dry environment safe for consumption when fruit flies and flies were present and flying in the dry storage room over a container of uncovered sugar, two boxes of opened and unsealed dry instant hot cereal mix, a bag of unsealed oats with a ripped opening, a bag of unsealed Raisin Bran cereal with a ripped opening; and, 3. Staff failed to adhere to current standards of practice by failing to wear beard restraints to prevent hair from contacting food. These failures had the potential to result in food contamination and foodborne illness for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-18 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its facility assessment and ensure staff adherence to the established contingency plan during an electronic health record (EHR) system downtime when nursing staff were not provided timely direction and were unaware of procedures to follow when the EHR was inaccessible for a census of 104. This failure resulted in the facility's EHR inaccesibility, which resulted delays in medication administration and the potential to affect the residents' health and safety. Findings: During an interview on 4/15/25 at 11:21 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated the internet was down, preventing access to the EHR. The outage began at approximately 5:00 a.m. The DON stated, when this occurs, nurses are expected to print their own medication administrator record (MARs) from the backup computer located in the medication room. The DON stated, the emergency backup computer was also not functioning, and they had to connect to a different computer. The DON also stated the medication administration expectation was for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-18 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective and comprehensive Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program was performed for a census of 104, when the facility did not maintain documentation and did not present evidence of the previous three quarterly meetings. This failure had the potential to result in quality care improvement activities to not be evaluated and revised as needed and had the potential to negatively impact the quality care for the residents. Findings: During an interview on 4/18/25 at 8:40 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated, I did attend the last QAA/QAPI .I don't know about the previous three quarterly meetings. I am not sure about the previous quarterly QAPIs .I am not sure what they did before. With the eight months that we've been here . it has been a hard to get a grasp on things. During an interview on 4/18/25 at 8:49 a.m. with the Social Services Director (SSD), the SSD stated, . table issues and concerns [from QAPI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. During a review of Resident 97's AR, indicated Resident 97 was readmitted in early 2025 with diagnoses which included pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs) and respiratory failure (lungs cannot properly exchange gases causing abnormal levels of carbon dioxide and/or oxygen). During a review of Resident 97's OSR, dated 3/29/25, the OSR indicated, O2 [oxygen] 5 L/min [liters per minute] via T [trach]-mist continuous at night as needed. During an concurrent observation and interview on 4/15/25 at 9:35 a.m. in Resident 97's room, Resident 97 sat in bed, awake and verbally responsive, with a trach collar (a soft adjustable neck device that secures a tracheostomy tube in place) connected to an oxygen tubing with no label or date. Resident 97 put her passy muir valve (speaking valve, allows one with a tracheostomy to potentially voice and produce speech sounds) to the trach, and stated, This [oxygen] tubing, they change this tube every two weeks. I don't know when they changed it. They don't put a label…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment in safe operating condition when: 1. Frozen brownish residue on the bottom shelf of Freezer 1 was present; 2. Boilerless Steamer was found leaking clear liquid onto the floor pooling at the base of a metal panel; and, 3. Two ovens with brownish black residue, and all four stove burners were observed with food and black burnt residue. These failures had the potential for mold growth and food contamination of resident food stored in the freezer and prepared in the steamer, oven, and stovetop. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/15/25 at 8:40 a.m. in the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM), brownish tinted frozen residue on the bottom shelf of freezer was observed. DM confirmed presence of frozen residue on shelf. The DM stated, expectation is that there should not be any residue or crumbs on shelf of freezer. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/15/25 at 9:20 a.m. in the kitchen with Registered Dietician (RD), observed two ovens with brownish black…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure communication boards were available at the bedside for three of 33 sampled residents (Resident 19, Resident 24 and Resident 58) who did not speak English. This failure had the potential to result in reduced ability for the residents to express their needs, preferences, and choices, placing them at risk for unmet care needs and taking away their right to participate in decisions about their care. Findings: During a review of Resident 19's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 19 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease stage 3B (kidneys are not filtering blood as well, moderate to severe kidney damage), and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (complete paralysis and weakness following a stroke). The AR also indicated Resident 19's primary language was Russian. During a review of Resident 19's Care Plans (CP), the CP indicated, that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment when: 1. Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] was found to have a dark brown substance on the floor; and, 2. Four out of 11 rooms (C15, C17, C18 and C21) in the memory care unit had curtains by the sliding doors that were worn and had visible brown discolorations on them. These failures reduced the facility's potenital to provide residents with a homelike environment and had the potential to negatively impact the resident's quality of life. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 69's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated, Resident 69 was admitted to the facility in early June 2023 with multiple diagnoses of myopathy (disease that affects the muscles that control voluntary movement in the body) and paraplegia (loss of movement and/or sensation, to some degree, of the legs). During a review of Resident 69's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure injury prevention consistent with the professional standards of practice for one of 33 sampled residents (Resident 106), when regular and timely turning and repositioning was not implemented. This failure had the potential risk to result in skin breakdown and Resident 106 not attaining his highest practicable physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 106's admission Record (AR, a page of resident's medical chart containing admission information, diagnoses, etcetera) was admitted to the facility in early 2024 with diagnoses which included hematoma (a collection of blood outside of a blood vessel caused by a broken blood vessel) of skin and subcutaneous (innermost layer of skin) tissue following surgery, chronic kidney disease, muscle weakness and limitation of activities due to disability. During a review of Resident 106's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 3/21/25, the MDS indicated Resident 106 had no memory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 33 sampled residents (Resident 58) significant weight loss was addressed and monitored. This failure resulted in further weight loss for Resident 58. Findings: During a review of Resident 58's admission Record (AR), AR indicated, Resident 58 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy (a change in how the brain works due to an underlying condition), Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), hypothyroidism (the thyroid gland, an organ doesn't produce enough thyroid hormones which can disrupt all types of metabolism), hyperosmolality (blood has a high concentration of salt) and hypernatremia (blood has an abnormally high concentration of sodium) and dysphagia oral phase (problems using mouth, lips and tongue to control food or liquid). During a review of Resident 58's Nutritional Risk Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During a review of Resident 6's AR, the AR indicated, Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included other intervertebral disc degeneration (natural breakdown of discs between the bones of the spine), chronic pain syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis with rheumatoid factor of multiple sites (immune system is attacking the joints causing pain, swelling and stiffness), unilateral primary osteoarthritis (joint pain and degeneration affecting only one side of the body), varicose veins of bilateral lower extremities with pain (swollen, twisted veins in the legs that can cause discomfort like aching, throbbing or burning). During a review of Resident 6's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 6 had no memory impairment. During an observation and interview on 4/15/25 at 9:35 a.m. in the hallway, Resident 6 appeared to be in distress, moaning and grimacing while saying 'dolor' (pain). At 9:49 a.m. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5 went in the room and stated that Resident 6 was talking about pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to adequately maintain pharmacy services for 11 residents out of a census of 104 when: 1.The facility did not have a complete controlled drug (medication that may be abused or cause addiction) destruction record log, and; 2.The facility did not reconcile the controlled drug records when the original controlled drug sheets went missing for medication cart A2. These failures had the potential to cause inaccurate accountability of controlled medications and the potential to result in residents' controlled meedication diversion. Findings: 1.During a concurrent observation and record review of the controlled medication storage on 4/16/25 at 9 a.m. in the Director of Nursing's (DON) office, a review of 11 random residents' controlled drug records, indicated no documented evidence a destruction log was recorded when receiving discontinued controlled medications from the nurses. During an interview on 4/16/25 at 9:15 a.m. with the DON, the DON verified the 11 controlled medications did not have a destruction log and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed for a census of 104 to ensure : 1.Observed in the medication room [ROOM NUMBER]: -Treatment supplies had expiration dates. - Expired Tube feeding formulas were removed. 2. Observed in the medication carts A1 and A2: -Narcotic cabinet is used only for narcotics in accordance with facility policy and procedure, -Expired and discharged resident medications were disposed accordingly -Medications and over the counter products were appropriately labeled with open and discard dates. 3. Narcotic count sheets are signed by both incoming and off going shift's licensed nurses in accordance with facility policy and procedure. These failures decreased the facility's potential to provide an updated treatment and nutrition supplies, and prevent medication administration errors. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/17/25 at 8:20 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON) in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER], the following expired tube feeding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer insulin (a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication) as prescribed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure had the potential for ineffective drug therapy. Findings: A review of Resident 3 ' s admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility 2/26/25 with diagnoses that included diabetes (blood sugar is too high) and orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation. During a review of Resident 3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool), dated 3/4/25, described Resident 1 as having clear speech, able to understand others, able to make herself understood and as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score of 15 (score of 13-15 indicated cognitively intact). During a review of Resident 3 ' s Order Summary Report for March 2025 contained a physician ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure sanitary practices in the kitchen were established for residents in the facility for a total census of 106 when: 1. Freezer temperatures were not maintained in acceptable food range; 2. Unsafe infection control practices were observed in the kitchen. These failures had the potential to lead to food borne illness. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/19/25 at 9:49 a.m. with the Registered Dietician (RD), the freezer temperature for the freezer at the entrance of the kitchen was observed at 10 degrees Fahrenheit, the RD confirmed the observed temperature. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/19/25 at 9:56 a.m. with RD the freezer next to the dishwashing area was observed at 38 degrees Fahrenheit and the freezer temperature log indicated a temperature of 20 degrees Fahrenheit on 2/18/25. The RD confirmed the freezer temperature was out of range and stated should have notified environmental services immediately so it could be resolved timely. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the availability of routine medications for one (Resident 1) of four sampled residents, when Resident 1 ' s medication was not in stock for administration. This failure had the potential for not meeting Resident 1 ' s therapeutic needs or for worsening of the resident's medical conditions. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in November of 2024 with diagnoses that included anemia (disorder of blood cells ' oxygen carrying capacity), depression, and diabetes. A review of Resident 1 ' s Order Details, dated 11/23/24, indicated, Vitamin D3 Oral Tablet 25 MCG (1000 UT [International Units, a unit of measurement for certain medications]) (Cholecalciferol [Vitamin D3]). Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Supplement. During an interview on 1/22/25 at 12:14 p.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, LN 1 indicated that the facility did not have Vitamin D3 tablets in dosage of 1000 IU. LN 1 further indicated that, due to the lack of Vitamin D3 1000 IU, she was forced to cut unscored (a lack of a line…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards of food safety for a census of 102, when two packages of frozen salmon filets and two packages of frozen cod filets were not thawed according to food safety standards, and nine opened bottles of dry spices, one opened bottle of beef base, and one bag of opened pink lemonade powder were unlabeled. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses for residents eating facility prepared meals. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/22/25 at 10:15 a.m., in the kitchen with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the DS confirmed four packages of frozen fish filets to be used for dinner were thawing on a kitchen table countertop. The DS also confirmed nine opened bottles of dry spices, one opened bottle of beef base, and one bag of opened pink lemonade powder were unlabeled. During an interview on 1/22/25 at 11:58 a.m., with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the RD indicated food labeling was important, so kitchen staff knew when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain equipment in safe operating condition for a census of 102, when a kitchen freezer was found with ice build-up on its ceiling and a broken seal gasket (rubber lining around freezer doors to keep outside air out and maintain a consistent temperature). This failure had the potential of leading to food borne illness for the residents eating facility prepared meals. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/22/25 at 10:31 a.m., with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the DS confirmed the freezer nearest the dishwashing area had a broken gasket seal and had ice buildup on its ceiling near its doors. Furthermore, the DS confirmed that five bags of hash browns were not frozen solid, and one bag of vegetables had freezer burn. The DS indicated the freezer having a poor seal can affect the quality of food. A review of the facility's document titled, DIETARY SERVICES – KITCHEN SANITATION / FOOD STORAGE, undated, indicated for kitchen staff to inspect, Freezer & motor clean; seals tight; no ice build…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 5) when facility staff witnessed Resident 4 punch Resident 5. This failure resulted in Resident 5 not being free from abuse and had the potential for Resident 5 to feel afraid and scared. Findings: Resident 5 was originally admitted to the facility in 2016 with multiple diagnoses which included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions), major depressive disorder (health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), bipolar disorder (mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings) and undifferentiated schizophrenia (symptoms may include signs of psychosis, such as delusions and hallucinations, or drastic changes in behavior, speech, or mobility). A review of Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide monitoring and supervision for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 5) when Resident 5, who has a history of disruptive behavior, was hit by Resident 4 while out in the courtyard unsupervised. This failure resulted in Resident 5 getting punched and had the potential for harm to other residents. Findings: Resident 5 was originally admitted to the facility in 2016 with multiple diagnoses which included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions), major depressive disorder (health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), bipolar disorder (mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings) and undifferentiated schizophrenia (symptoms may include signs of psychosis, such as delusions and hallucinations, or drastic changes in behavior, speech, or mobility). A review of Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect resident information when meal tickets (containing resident information) were discarded into the garbage and subsequently into the outside dumpster. This failure had the potential of compromising resident information for 103 residents receiving facility provided meals for a census of 109. Findings: During a visit to the kitchen on 5/22/24 at 10:33 a.m., Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) was taking breakfast meal trays off the carts to wash. As DA 1 grabbed the trays, she separated out like items for wash, and threw leftover food, napkins, and meal tickets into the garbage. When asked, she stated that this was the usual process for setting up for dish washing. Tray tickets noted to include resident name, room number, diet order, food allergies, food preferences, and special dietary needs. Subsequent interview with Dietary Manager (DM) on 5/22/24 at 10:38 a.m., DM stated throwing tray tickets into the trash was a problem since trash is brought to the outside dumpsters which is open to the public. As such, this would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Resident 80 and Resident 93) of 30 sampled residents had adequate indications for the use of psychotropic medications (drug prescribed to affect the mind, emotions, or behavior) when: 1. Resident 80 was administered olanzapine (a psychotropic medication indicated for psychosis); and, 2. Resident 93 was administered aripiprazole (a psychotropic medication indicated for psychosis). This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent residents from experiencing adverse effects such as sedation, falls and abnormal involuntary movements from the use of antipsychotic medication. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 80's admission record indicated admission to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (paralysis that affects one side of your body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness that affects one side of your body) following a cerebral infarction (blockage of blood flow in the brain causing brain damage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5% (five percent) for one resident (Resident 712) of 30 sampled residents when Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3) administered Resident 712's medications not in accordance with standard nursing principles and practices or the facility policy. This failure resulted in a medication error rate of 30.3%. Findings: During an observation on 5/21/24 at 8:08 a.m. of a medication administration through a gastrotomy tube (GT, also known as a Peg-tube, a placed into a patient's stomach through the abdominal wall), the LN 3 was observed crushing six pills together and at the same time. The LN 3 immediately placed the crushed pills in a 110 milliliter (ml, a unit of measure) medication cup with two liquid medications and two powdered medications. The mixture of the crushed pills, powdered medication and liquid medication were administered at the same time in a bolus (medical administration given all at one) administration with a 60 ml syringe, in two parts through the GT. The LN 3 did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a clean and sanitary environment and labeled correctly with open and discard dates, when: 1. A loose pill was found in medication cart 2; 2. A medication cup was found stored in the top drawer of medication cart 2, containing 11 loose pills and was not labeled with resident's name or drug identifiers; 3. An opened inhaler and eye drops were not dated with open or discard dates in medication cart 2; and, 4. A medication blister pack found displaced and in the back of medication cart 1. These failures decreased the facility's potential to prevent drug diversion and medication administration errors. Findings: 1. During an inspection of medication cart two on 5/22/24 at 9:55 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), the LN 1 verified there was a loose pill in the medication cart. During an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 5/24/24 at 11:30 a.m., the ADON acknowledged having loose pills in the medication cart was an issue. The ADON stated, NOC [night] shift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and distributed in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. There were no functional thermometers for dry storage room monitoring and for internal temperature monitoring for freezer #1; 2. There were incomplete records of daily temperature logs for refrigerators, freezers, and dry storage area; 3. Food items were not properly labeled or sealed and expired foods were not discarded; 4. The racks in refrigerator #2 and refrigerator #3 had rust on the surface and were unable to be readily sanitized; 5. The facility did not install or maintain a drain air gap in the sink used to prepare fruits and vegetables; 6. The facility did not maintain a clean can opener; 7. The facility did not ensure the exterior surface of the dishwasher and drawers containing kitchen utensils were clean; 8. The kitchen surfaces were stained, had chipped paint, and missing floor tiles; 9. Kitchen staff did not perform hand hygiene when moving from dirty to clean surfaces;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to obtain informed consent (the process in which a health care provider educates a patient about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a given procedure or intervention) on the use of psychotropic medication (drugs that affect a person's mental state) from the resident's Responsible Party (RP, a person designated to make decisions for the resident who is unable to make decisions for himself) for one resident (Resident 73) of 30 sampled residents. This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure residents and RPs were aware of the risks, benefits, and alternatives of treatment offered to them. Findings: A review of Resident 73's admission record indicated admission to the facility April 2022 with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (complete paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (partial paralysis of one side of the body) affecting the right side, dementia (the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions) with psychotic disturbance, anxiety disorder (a feeling of fear, dread, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement person-centered comprehensive care plans for three residents (Residents 30, 53, and 73) out of 30 sampled residents. This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide appropriate interventions in order for residents to maintain their highest medical and physical practicable level of function. Findings: A review of Resident 30's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive and generalized weakness. A review of Resident 30's Order Summary Report (OSR, physician orders) indicated an order for oxygen at 2 L (liter, a unit of measurement) per minute through a nasal cannula with a start date of 8/4/23. During an observation on 5/21/24 at 8:54 a.m., in Resident 30's room, Resident 30 was observed laying supine (on their back) in bed wearing a nasal cannula (a plastic tube used to deliver oxygen into your nose) connected to an oxygen concentrator (a medical device that provides oxygen) with oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to revise care plans for two residents (Resident 38 and 82) out of 30 sampled residents when the care plans were not revised within a timely manner. This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide appropriate interventions for the residents to maintain their highest medical and physical practicable level of function. Findings: A review of Resident 38's admission record indicated admission to the facility in August 2017 with diagnoses which included dysphagia (inability or refusal to swallow) and the presence of a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, an opening into the stomach for nutritional support). A review of Resident 38's Order Summary Report (OSR, physician orders) indicated Resident 38's tube feeding order started on 12/24/19. A review of Resident 38's nutritional care plan, revised on 2/15/24, indicated Resident 38 was to receive Jevity (R), therapeutic nutrition, 1.2 at 75 ml (milliliters, a unit of measurement) per hour. During on observation on 5/21/24 at 9:53 a.m. in Resident 38's room, Resident 38…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing care was provided per professional standards of quality for one resident (Resident 73) of 30 sampled residents when Licensed Nurses (LNs): 1. Did not ensure informed consent was obtained from Resident 73's Responsible Party (RP, a person who has legal authority to make health care decisions for a person who is unable to for himself) prior to the administration of psychotropic medication (medications that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior); 2. Did not obtain a physician's order to flush Resident 73's midline catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the larger veins in the upper arm used to administer intravenous medication); and, 3. Did not follow the prescribed physician's order for oxygen administered to Resident 73. These failures decreased the facility's potential to provide responsible and accurate nursing care to Resident 73. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 73's admission record indicated admission to the facility in April 2022 with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were maintained for a census of 109 residents, when a medication was improperly disposed of in an opened, regular trash can on the side of the medication cart. This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent: unauthorized staff, residents, and visitors access to prescription drugs, the potential for drug diversion, and medical adverse consequences. Findings: During an inspection of medication cart two on [DATE] at 9:55 a.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN 1), the LN 1 verified there was a loose pill in the medication cart. The LN 1 was observed disposing of the loose pill in an opened, regular trash can on the side of the medication cart. The LN 1 stated, That is the trash can I use for non-narcotic [a class of medications that are not addictive] medications that need to be thrown away. When asked about the risks of throwing medications away in an open trash can, the LN 1 acknowledged throwing the pill in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pureed (cooked food blended to the consistency of a cream paste) foods were prepared in a manner that conserved nutritive value and palatability (taste) when foods were thinned with an unmeasured amount of tap water or liquid from the can containing the food. This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure food met resident nutritional needs and was flavorful. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 5/22/24 at 9:08 a.m., [NAME] 1 (CK 1) was preparing pureed roast beef. The CK 1 opened a bag of precooked roast beef and drained off the liquid. The CK 1 placed meat in blender and added an unmeasured amount of hot tap water. The CK 1 blended the roast beef and water until the mixture was a smooth, pureed texture. The CK 1 proceeded to blend a second batch of roast beef which was too watery and needed to be corrected to thicken the product. The CK 1 next made mashed sweet potatoes by placing canned sweet potatoes and an unmeasured amount of liquid from the can into the blender.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain two reach-in freezers (freezer #1 and #3) and two reach-in refrigerators (refrigerator #2 and #3) in safe operating condition when door seals were observed with tears or gaps and did not provide a complete seal. This decreased the facility's potential to ensure food safety and quality for 103 residents who ate facility prepared meals with a census of 109. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 5/21/24 at 8:48 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM) reach-in refrigerator and freezer doors were checked for complete seals. The seal on freezer #1 had two gaps in two opposite corners about one inch wide. The freezer #3 had two gaps in the bottom corners of the door: one gap at the door hinge side about one inch wide, and on the opposite corner gap under one inch wide. The refrigerator #2 had two smaller gaps at the bottom (under one inch) and a black tape covering majority of the bottom seal. The refrigerator #3 had torn seal on the unhinged part of the door with about 2-3 inches of seal material hanging down. The DM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0825 — patternProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure rehabilitative services were adequately provided for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2 and Resident 3) when occupational therapy (OT) was not performed according to their plans of care. This failure had the potential to result in the residents failing to attain their highest practicable level of physical and functional well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated he was admitted in 1/24 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis) following unspecified cerebrovascular disease (a term used for conditions that affect blood flow to the brain) affecting his right dominant side. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 1's clinical record included the following documents: An Order Summary Report, dated 2/26/24 indicated the following physician's (MD) orders for OT: 1. An order, dated 1/9/24, for services five times a week for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 2) was free from abuse when Resident 1 slapped and punched Resident 2 in the face and nose. This failure resulted in Resident 2 sustaining a swollen and reddened nose and a lump on the right temple. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility over 9 years ago and diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (disorder that affects someone's movement) and neurocognitive disorder (decreased mental function due to a medical disease), bipolar disorder (episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), and schizophrenia (mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels and behaves). During a review of Resident 1's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set-an assessment tool), dated 10/19/23, described Resident 1 as able to make himself understood and as having the ability to understand others. The MDS described Resident 1 as having a BIMS (a brief screening that aids in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from abuse when she was struck in the face by Resident 2. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a small, reddened area to her forehead and a bloody nose. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated she was last admitted in 8/21 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities) and major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life). An MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool), dated 11/15/23, indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment and unclear speech. A review of Resident 1's clinical record included the following documents: An SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse policy for two of five sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when the results of the investigation of an alleged abuse incident between the residents were not reported to the Department within 5 working days of the incident. This failure could have potentially caused a delay in the investigation of the alleged event. Findings: In an interview, on 12/11/23 at 9:09 a.m., the Administrator (ADM) confirmed the facility had reported an allegation of abuse concerning Resident 1 and Resident 2 to the Department on 11/20/23 and the results of the facility's investigation had not been provided to the Department within 5 working days. A review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention, Intervention, Investigation & Crime Reporting Policy, revised 2016, indicated the facility would report the results of an alleged abuse allegation to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) received care which met professional standards when she was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation, sustained a bloody nose and it was not documented in the nursing assessment. This failure resulted in inaccurate assessment documentation and had the potential to result in unmet nursing needs for Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated she was last admitted in 8/21 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities) and major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life). An MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool), dated 11/15/23, indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment and unclear speech. A review of Resident 1's clinical record included the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from abuse, when Resident 2 punched Resident 1 in the face and pulled her hair. This failure resulted in injury to Resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in late 1999 with diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease (loss of kidney function), and major depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 7/21/23, indicated Resident 1's memory was intact. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in mid-2021 with diagnoses which included anxiety disorder (intense, excessive, and persistent worry), bipolar disorder (mood swings and or emotional ups and downs), and psychosis (difficulty determining what is real and what is not). A review of Resident 2's most recent MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 2's memory was severely impaired. During an interview on 10/9/23, at 12:45 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the health, safety and security of one of three residents (Resident 1) when the facility failed to report an alleged resident to resident altercation involving Resident 2. This failure had the potential to endanger the health and well-being of all 101 residents in the facility. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in mid-2021 with diagnoses which included anxiety disorder (worry, difficulty thinking), bipolar disorder (mood swings and or emotional ups and downs), and psychosis (difficulty determining what is real and what is not). During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 8/30/23, the MDS indicated the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status, an assessment tool), reflected a severe knowledge and memory impairment. During an interview on 10/9/23 at 1:15 p.m., with License Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1), LVN 1 stated, .[Resident 2] was put on 1:1 as an intervention. She [Resident 2] has behaviors such as .She [Resident 2] had an encounter about a month ago with another…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure only authorized personnel had access to medications and biologicals (type of medical therapy derived from living organisms) for a census of 105 when: 1. An unlocked medication cart was left unattended in the hallway of the facility; 2. Loose pills were found at the bottom of drawers of a medication cart and a container of unpackaged medications were in the bottom drawer of the medication cart; and, 3. A container of medications awaiting destruction was stored in an unlocked room. This failure had the potential to place the facility at risk for drug diversion and accidental use of controlled medications by residents. Findings: On [DATE] at 8:20 a.m., a medication cart (Cart A) was observed in the hallway of facility A-Hall. The cart was at the door of Room A1, the Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1) could not be seen through the open door of the room. In a subsequent interview, the LN 1 confirmed the cart was unlocked and the drawers could be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure measures were taken for two residents (Resident 70 and Resident 36) for a census of 105, when: 1. Resident 70's recommended blood tests were not conducted; and, 2. Resident 36's medication regimen review (MRR) recommendations were not addressed by the physician. These failures increased the potential for Resident 70 and Resident 36's health to deteriorate. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 70's clinical record indicated he was admitted in early 2020 with diagnoses which included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), hypertensive chronic kidney disease stage 4, and hyperglycemia (a high sugar level in the blood). A review of Resident 70's MRR dated 2/17/22 indicated the pharmacist (PharmD) recommended blood tests to be conducted to monitor for preventable adverse effects of the medication olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication to treat psychosis). A review of Resident 70's clinical record between 2/17/22 and 5/25/22 showed no documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its pharmaceutical policies and procedures for a census of 105 when: 1. Unsealed medications had no written open date; and, 2. Expired medications were found in medication carts. These failures had the potential to result in ineffective and expired medication to be administered to the residents. Findings: During an observation on 5/24/22 at 9:56 a.m., the following items were found in Cart A (medication cart for A-Hall) without open dates indicated on them: -one bottle of ciprofloxacin eye drops (used to treat eye infection) 5ML (milliliters, unit of measure for volume of fluids) labeled with, use for 7 days; -one inhaler of atrovent HFA (used to control and prevent wheezing and shortness of breath) 12.9 grams (unit of measure for weight); and, -one inhaler of albuterol sulfate (used to control symptoms of asthma) 6.7 grams. In an concurrent observation on the following medications were found expired: -two bottles of timolol 5ML (used to treat high pressure inside the eye) with a discard date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the nutritive value of pureed food was maintained when excess water and thickener were used in the preparation. This failure had the potential of leading to malnutrition and/or weight loss for eight (out of 105 residents) receiving pureed meals. Findings: On 5/24/22 at 10:42 am [NAME] 1 (Ck 1) began to make pureed turkey for the lunch meal. She took an unmeasured amount of turkey (filling about 1/2 of the blender) and added an unmeasured amount of water before turning on the blender. She stopped blending to add more turkey and proceeded to blend. She then poured the mixture into a small steamtable pan. When asked about the texture, she stated it was too liquid, and added an unmeasured amount of thickener. Cov Care-Courtyard Health Care Center Roast turkey pureed recipe, Amount of thickener required may vary relative to liquid content of cooked product .alternate processing and thickener checking consistency periodically. During a visit to kitchen on 5/25/22 at 9:33 a.m. Ck 1 was preparing a Beef…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assure food safety when 1) unpasteurized eggs (eggs are gently heated in their shells, just enough to kill the bacteria but not enough to actually cook the egg, making them safe to use in any recipe that calls for uncooked or partially cooked eggs) were used in the preparation of meals, 2) food in the refrigerator was found undated and/or unlabeled, 3) expired foods were found in the refrigerator, and 4) resident refrigerator/freezer was dirty. These failures had the potential of leading to food born illness for the 103 residents (out of 105) eating at the facility. Findings: 1) During the initial kitchen tour on 5/24/22 at 8:12 a.m. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the first reach-in refrigerator had 1 and 1/2 half boxes of eggs that were not pasteurized, and no other eggs were found. In a subsequent interview with [NAME] 1 (Ck 1), she stated that she does make eggs per resident request such as sunny side up or soft-cooked.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection prevention and control practices were performed for a census of 105, when: 1. Housekeeping Staff (HS) incorrectly cleaned and disinfected residents' rooms; and, 2. There was no trash bin available inside the yellow isolation room to discard doffed (removed) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). These failures decreased the facility's potential to prevent the spread of infection. 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/27/22, at 9:15 a.m., Housekeeping Staff (HS) 1 cleaned and disinfected Room A14. The HS 1 cleaned and disinfected the room, cleaned and disinfected the bathroom, then returned to clean and disinfect the bedroom. The HS 1 stated, I clean and disinfect the bedroom first, then the bathroom, then back to the bedroom. During an interview on 5/27/22 at 9:17 a.m., the Housekeeping Director (HD) acknowledged the proper room cleaning and disinfecting process should have been clean-to-dirty, bedroom…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was created for one resident (Resident 103) of three sampled residents when Resident 103 had a change of condition. This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide Resident 103 person-centered care. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 103 was admitted to the facility in March 2021 with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (a disruption of blood flow to the brain). A review of a physician's order, dated 2/16/22 at 8:40 p.m., indicated, .Hospice Diagnosis: Heart Failure .Patient is being followed by [hospice services] .Do not transfer to hospital, no labs or weight .vital signs as needed to assess pain/ respiratory distress . A review of care plans showed no documented evidence a care plan regarding Resident 103's change to hospice care. In an interview on 5/26/22 at 2:30 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated it was facility policy to review and update the care plan of residents upon returning from acute care hospital based on diagnoses and health condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility licensed nurses failed to disconnect and flush Resident 46's feeding tube for a census of 105. This failure increased the potential for Resident 46's feeding tube to become obstructed. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 46 was admitted in August 2017 with diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), unspecified feeding difficulties, and gastrostomy- tube (G-tube, a tube placed into the stomach used to deliver nutrients). In an observation on 5/25/22 at 10:59 a.m., Resident 46 was in bed with her G-tube connected to a feeding pump at bedside. The feeding pump and tubing was filled with nutritional formula and was turned off. In an interview on 5/25/22 at 11:01 a.m., the Licensed Nurse 8 (LN 8) stated the physician ordered Resident 46's formula to run over 20 hours and then the feeding was to be turned off and disconnected from the resident by 10 a.m. The LN 8 stated Resident 46 should be disconnected from the feeding pump and her G-tube should be flushed with water to keep the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 5) of 21 sampled residents took a medication when the medication was left on the bedside table by the a licensed nurse. This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure medications were safely administered. Findings: A review of Resident 5's clinical record indicated she was admitted in late 2014 with diagnoses which included hypokalemia (lower than normal potassium level in the bloodstream). A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 3/16/22, indicated Resident 5 had no memory problems. A review of a physician's order, dated 11/11/16, indicated Resident 5 does not have the capacity to make healthcare decisions. A review of a physician's order, dated 10/12/21, indicated, Potassium Chloride liquid, give 30 milliliter [unit of measurement] by mouth two times a day for supplement. During an observation and concurrent interview on 5/27/22 at 8:58 a.m., Resident 5 was in bed and a medicine cup was on top of the overbed table. The medicine cup was full…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DHUGGA, GURPREET | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2025 |
| TAYLOR, KIMBERLEY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2025 |
| PORT, BARRY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 07/26/2018 |
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/20/2024 |
| KEETCH, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2011 |
| MONETTE, CORY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/20/2024 |
| SATO, AMI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/20/2024 |
| WILLITS, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/20/2024 |
| JACKSON THERAPY PARTNERS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2025 |
| ENSIGN SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/20/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055922. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.