Brookfield Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 239 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 108 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 63.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.93 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent a fall with injury for one of three residents (Resident 19) with history of falls by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 19 performed toilet transfers toward the left, unaffected side and did not place weight onto the right leg after toileting. 2. Provide Resident 19 with two-persons assistance for toilet transfers and toilet hygiene (toileting, includes managing undergarments, clothing, and incontinence products and performing cleansing before or after voiding or having a bowel movement). 3. Provide Resident 19 with two-persons assistance for sit to stand transfers (transfers from a seated position to a standing position) after toileting. These failures resulted in Resident 19 falling from a standing position onto the floor in the restroom on 7/30/2023. On 7/31/2023, Resident 19 complained of right shoulder pain and received an X-ray (used to create images of the inside of the human body) which indicated Resident 19 had a right humeral (shoulder bone) fracture (break in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 19) was free of significant medication errors, when:1. Resident 19's orders for Percocet (medication used to treat moderate or severe pain) and methocarbamol (a muscle relaxer used to relieve muscle, bone, and joint pain) were not clarified.2. Resident 19 was administered methocarbamol and Percocet together.These deficient practices had the potential to result in Resident 19 experiencing sedation (when given too much a medication that makes an individual sleepier or less conscious than intended) and respiratory arrest (when an individual stops breathing).Findings:During a review of Resident 19's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 19's diagnoses included displaced fracture of the greater trochanter of the left femur (a break in the prominent, bony knob on the outer part of the left thigh bone and the broken pieces are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan with interventions for two of eight sampled residents (Resident 19 and 48) to address:1. Resident 19's use of methocarbamol (a muscle relaxer used to relieve muscle, bone, and joint pain).2. Resident 48's lack of dentures (a removable dental appliance that replaces missing teeth and surrounding tissues).This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 19 and 48's mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being and had the potential to delay the delivery of necessary care and services.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 19's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included displaced fracture of greater trochanter of the left femur (a break in the prominent, bony knob on the outer part of the left thigh bone and the broken pieces are moved out of their normal alignment), displaced fracture of distal phalanx of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when staff failed to:1. Complete all sections of Resident 1's Fall Risk Evaluation, and develop a short-term fall care plan, following his fall on 11/13/2025.2. Conduct a Fall Risk Evaluation after Resident 1's fall on 11/21/2025.3. Revise Resident 1's fall risk care plan following his falls on 11/13/2025 and 11/21/2025.These deficient practices placed Resident 1 at risk for repeat falls and potential injury.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including reduced mobility, abnormal posture, limited ability or inability to move one side of the body following a stroke (loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) affecting his left side. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy (a medical treatment that provides extra oxygen to breathe, typically prescribed for individuals with conditions causing low blood oxygen levels) was administered as ordered by the physician for two of 18 sampled residents (Residents 72 and 19). This deficient practice placed Resident 72 and Resident 19 at risk of sustaining complications of receiving too much supplemental oxygen.Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 72's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 72 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident 72's diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF, a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), upper respiratory infection, and asthma (a long-term condition that affects the airways in the lungs). During a review of Resident 72's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a meal that was attractively appeasing and palatable for one of two sampled residents (Resident 71).This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 71's individual dietary and nutritional needs not being met, causing Resident 71 to not want to eat. Findings: During a review of Resident 71's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 71 was newly admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 71's diagnoses included diabetes (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and congestive heart failure (a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling). During a review of Resident 71's History and Physical (H&P), dated 12/4/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 71 was awake, alert, and was able to answer questions appropriately. During a review of Resident 71's Order Summary Report, dated 12/2/2025, the Order Summary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control measures for one of five sampled residents (Resident 61) when:1. Resident 61 was placed on contact precautions (using extra barriers, like gowns and gloves, to stop germs from spreading by touching a sick person or things in their room) with no visual signage to ensure hands were washed with soap and water. 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 performed hand hygiene with alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR- a liquid that is rubbed on the hands to quickly kill germs and stop their spread, without needing soap and water) instead of soap and water upon exiting Resident 61's room.These deficient practices had the potential to result in the spread of clostridium difficile (C. diff- a highly contagious bacteria that causes severe diarrhea) to the residents and staff.Findings:During a review of Resident 61's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 61 was initially admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct an accurate fall reassessment for one of seventeen residents (Resident 3), after a fall.This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 3 not to receive the proper interventions to prevent further falls and injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including muscle weakness and diabetes mellitus (DM- abnormal blood sugar level), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body).During a review of Resident 3's History and Physical (H&P), dated 10/17/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 3 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 3's Fall Risk Evaluation dated 10/15/2024, the evaluation did not indicate Resident 3 had a fall in the past 3 months. The evaluation indicated Resident 3 was incontinent, had balance problems with standing/walking and required use of assistive devices…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a resident-centered plan of care after one of three sampled residents (Resident 3), had a fall.This deficient practice resulted in the facility not having a care plan to implement for the resident's safety after the fall and had the potential to cause recurrent falls.Findings:During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including muscle weakness and diabetes mellitus (DM- abnormal blood sugar level), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body).During a review of Resident 3's History and Physical (H&P), dated 10/17/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 3 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions.During a review of Resident 3's SBAR Communication Form ([Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations] form that ensures all relevant information is conveyed in a structured manner) dated 10/29/2024, the SBAR indicated Resident 3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Residents 30) would not be administered any unnecessary medication in the form of duplicate drug therapy. (Cross Reference F756) The deficient practice created the risk for Resident 30 to receive excessive dosages of salmeterol (long-acting bcta2-adrcnergic agonist [[NAME]] medication, used to treat asthma - chronic inflammatory disease of the lungs) which are contained in both oral inhalers, Serevent Diskus (salmeterol) and Advair Diskus (a medication that contains both salmeterol and fluticasone propionate, an anti-inflammatory medicine, used to treat asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe) which could lead to the resident experiencing serious side effects that include, high blood pressure, fast heart rate, irregular heart rhythm, which could result in an overdosage or hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 30's admission Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a complete informed consent form (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) included the medication dosage, frequency, and behavioral manifestations prior to the administration of citalopram (medication used to treat major depressive disorder [a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest]) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 32). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 32 and their Responsible Party (RP) being unaware of the medication treatment ordered, thus, being unable to make an informed decision regarding Resident 32's care. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated Resident 32 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 32's diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (a progressive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA