No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Downey Post Acute

13007 S. Paramount Blvd., Downey, CA 90242 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (562) 923-9301 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (562) 923-9301 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Mar 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$13,575 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $13,575 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-09)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
12130 Paramount Blvd · (562) 904-4444 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.6 mi
8030 Imperial Hwy · (562) 861-6186 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7900 Imperial Hwy · (562) 231-5656 · Call to confirm hours
Park
12221 Industrial Ave · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.1%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.4%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms85.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.9%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.6%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.6%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.5%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.8%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.3%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.0%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.702.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.921.571.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 205 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
73.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.80U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.32hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.32hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 73.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.80 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.8%CMS range 36.5–52.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.5%CMS range 10.1–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge73.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge62.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 5.6–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.381.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.40
RN hours/ resident / day
1.26
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.64
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.29
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
39.3%
Total nursing turnover
0.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 90.8 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.29 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.50 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-07)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent a fall for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: 1. Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) provided a two-person physical assist (help from two persons) when using a Hoyer Lift (mechanical lift- a device used to transfer residents from a bed to a chair or other similar places) to transfer Resident 1 from a wheelchair to the bed. This deficient practice caused Resident 1 to fall, sustain a right distal femur fracture (thigh broken bone), was admitted to a general acute care hospital (GACH), and had an open reduction internal fixation ([ORIF]-surgical procedure to stabilize and heal a broken bone). Findings: During an interview on 8/12/2024 at 10:50 a.m., with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated on 8/2/2024 around 3:00 p.m., CNA 1 transferred her from the wheelchair to the bed using a Hoyer lift. Resident 1 stated the Hoyer lift sling broke and she fell. Resident 1 stated she had right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and food preparation practices was observed for all 95 residents. The facility failed to:1. Maintain cold food items at safe temperatures when glasses of milk and flan measured 50 to 61 degrees Fahrenheit ( F, a scale of temperature).2. Ensure staff did not wear a beaded bracelet during trayline service.3. Ensure one bottle of Martinelli's Sparkling Cider was labeled with the date received.These deficient practices had the potential to allow bacterial growth in potentially hazardous foods (PHFs- foods that require strict time and temperature control to prevent the growth of harmful bacteria or the formation of toxins) and increased the risk for food borne illness (a disease caused by consuming food or drinks that are contaminated by germs or chemicals) for residents who consumed food prepared and served from the kitchen.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/5/2026 at 12:15 p.m., with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) during tray line, one pre-plated glass of milk measured…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control measures for four of eight sampled residents by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 10's urinary catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine) collection bag did not touch the floor.2. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 performed hand hygiene (cleaning hands to remove dirt and bacteria) after preparing Resident 86's medications and before administering Resident 86's medications.3. Ensure LVN 1 sanitized the blood pressure cuff before using on Resident 101 after using on Resident 86.4. Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 wore personal protective equipment when changing Resident 82, who was on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP- an infection control measure to protect residents at high risk for multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO- bacteria resistant to multiple classes of antibacterial medication]).These deficient practices had the potential to result in the avoidable spread of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely notification to the responsible party (RP) and physician for one of six sampled residents (Resident 58) by failing to:Ensure the licensed nursing staff notified the Responsible Party (RP) that Resident 58 exhibited increased confusion and had partially slid off the bed on 4/20/2026.Ensure the licensed nursing staff notified the physician that Resident 58:Exhibited increased confusion during the early morning hours of 4/20/2026.Partially slid off the bed between approximately 2:30 am to 3:00 a.m. on 4/20/2026.Developed bruising to the left arm on 4/22/2026.These deficient practices had the potential to place Resident 58 at risk for delayed diagnosis, delayed treatment, worsening injury, unmanaged pain, and further decline. Resident 58 was later hospitalized and diagnosed with a left elbow fracture (broken bone).Cross Reference F689 and F842.Findings: During a review of Resident 58's admission Record, the admission Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was initiated for a resident's development of a bruise for one out of six sampled residents (Resident 58). These deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 58 at risk for delayed treatment, delayed assessment, and further injury. Resident 58 was later hospitalized and diagnosed with a left elbow fracture (broken bone). Cross Reference F580, F689, and F842. During a review of Resident 58's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 58 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 58's diagnoses included a displaced comminuted supracondylar fracture (a severe elbow injury where the humerus bone breaks into multiple pieces, with the bones separating), osteoarthrosis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage), muscle weakness, and repeated falls. During a review of Resident 58's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a resident assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise two of two sampled residents' (Residents 52 and 10) care plans to reflect their need for the Hoyer Lift (a mechanical device used to lift and/or transfer a person) during transfers.This deficient practice had the potential to result in the miscommunication of the transfer needs for Residents 52 and 10, which could lead to unsafe transfers.Cross Reference F689.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 52's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 52 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 52's diagnoses included generalized muscle weakness, Alzheimer's Disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). During a review of Resident 52's History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/24/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 52 did not have the capacity to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Residents 52 and 58) were free of accidents and hazards by failing to:1. Use a Hoyer Lift (a mechanical device used to lift and/or transfer a person) when Resident 52 was transferred from the shower chair to the bed on 4/29/2026.2. Conduct an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT- a coordinated group of experts from several different fields) meeting after Resident 52 sustained two injuries to the lower left leg from a shower chair-to-bed transfer on 4/29/2026.3. Ensure adequate supervision and timely physician notification occurred after Resident 58 exhibited acute confusion and displayed urgent desire to leave her bed. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 52 sustaining two wounds on her lower left leg and had the potential for additional accidents to occur. These deficient practices also resulted in Resident 58 being found partially sliding from the bed, which placed Resident 58 at risk for injury…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the volume of oxygen ordered by the physician for one of six sampled residents (Resident 61).This deficient practice resulted in Resident 61 receiving less oxygen than required and had the potential to negatively impact Resident 61's well-being.During a review of Resident 61's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 61 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 61's diagnoses included hypoxia (when the body does not get enough oxygen) and cerebral infarction (a stroke caused by blocked blood flow to the brain). During a review of Resident 61's Physician Orders, dated 8/8/2024, the Physician Orders indicated to administer oxygen at 2 liters (L, a unit of volume measurement) per minute via nasal cannula (a small plastic tube, which fits into the person's nostrils for providing supplemental oxygen), continuously every shift for shortness of breath. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete documentation on the Controlled Record for one of one sampled resident (Resident 110). This deficient practice resulted in the inaccurate count of medications remaining in the medication bubble pack (a card used to store medications for the resident) and had the potential to result in the administration of additional doses, drug diversion (the theft or misuse of prescription medications by health care providers for personal use), and/or medication errors.Findings:During a review of Resident 110's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included generalized muscle weakness, peripheral vascular disease (a slow progressive narrowing of the blood flow to the arms and legs), and hypertension (high blood pressure.During a review of Resident 110's Physician Order, dated 5/2/2026, the Physician Order indicated to administer Resident 110 Norco (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records for two out of twelve sampled residents (Resident 52 and Resident 58) by failing to: 1. Ensure nursing interventions and pertinent clinical details were documented after Resident 58 exhibited acute confusion and experienced an episode of partially sliding off the bed on 4/20/2026. 2. Ensure a skin assessment included bruising (occurs when small blood vessels near the skin's surface break from an injury) or discoloration to Resident 58's left arm on 4/22/2026. 2. Ensure a skin assessment was documented after Resident 52 sustained two wounds on her left lower leg on 4/29/2026. These deficient practices resulted in incomplete clinical communication regarding Resident 58 and a lack of a baseline skin assessment for Resident 52, which placed both residents at risk for delayed assessment, treatment, inappropriate clinical decision making and lack of continuity of care. Cross Reference F689 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0914 — isolated
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident 65's bedroom was equipped with a privacy curtain to ensure full visual privacy for one of six sampled residents (Resident 65). This deficient practice had the potential to violate the resident's right to visual privacy and dignity during personal care and activities of daily living. Findings:During a review of Resident 65's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 65 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 65's diagnoses included spinal stenosis (is when the spaces in the spine become narrow and press on the nerves) and muscle weakness.During a review of Resident 65's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 2/3/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 65's cognition (process of thinking) was intact. The MDS indicated Resident 65 was independent with toileting, bathing, and lower body dressing. During a review of Resident 65's History and Physical (H&P), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 44 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality, for one of three residents (Resident 2), by failing to:1). Ensure timely documentation was performed when Resident 2 was assessed and administered pain medication on 3/11/2026. 2). Ensure Resident 2, who had a foley catheter (catheter that drains urine from bladder into a bag outside the body), was provided a securing device (to keep the catheter from being pulled away), as indicated in the resident's care plan titled Resident with an episode of blood in the urine.These failures had the potential for poor quality care and placed Resident 2 at risk for unintentional drug overdose (taking more than what is safely prescribed) and further catheter-associated trauma (like bleeding), pain and discomforts, leading to complications and hospitalization.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident-centered care plan, for one of three residents (Resident 1), who was incontinent (no control) of bowel and bladder functions and who developed a Moisture-Associated Skin Damage (moisture associated skin damage caused from prolonged exposure to moisture) on 11/3/2025, was created, with interventions, to keep the resident's skin clean and dry. This failure resulted in delayed interventions and had resulted in the development of further MASDs, placing the resident at risk for wound complications and further skin breakdown.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 11/24/2025. The admission Record indicated Resident 1 had a history of muscle weakness, diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain) with loss of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision during toilet use to one of six sampled Residents (Resident 1), who was assessed as high risk for falls. This failure resulted in Resident 1 falling from the toilet and sustaining a forehead laceration (a deep cut in the skin), which required five sutures (used to close wounds and hold tissues together) at a general acute care hospital (GACH). Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 had diagnoses that included right femur fracture (a broken thighbone, a serious injury often requiring surgery and extensive rehabilitation, typically caused by high-impact trauma like falls), Alzheimer's (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), and osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones due to a lack of calcium and Vitamin D).During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During an observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to practice pressure related injury preventive practices for three out of seven residents (Resident 1, 2, and Resident 3): 1. Nursing staff did not follow doctor's order for a low air loss mattress ([LALM], a mattress that provides airflow to help keep skin dry, as well as to relieve pressure, treat pressure sores and prevents pressure sores) for Resident 1, 2, and 3. 2. Nursing staff did not follow up on LALM order status. 3. Nursing staff did not ensure Resident 1, 2, and 3 had LALM to prevent pressure injuries (localized area of tissue damage that develops when prolonged pressure or shear forces are applied to the skin and underlying tissues). These deficient practices placed Resident 1,2, and 3 at risk for further skin damage and it placed residents at risk for developing pressure injuries. Findings: During an observation on 7/24/2025 at 1146 a.m. Resident 1, 2, and 3 did not have a LALM on their bed. 1. A review of Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Braden scale assessment (tool used in Skilled Nursing Facilities to assess a patient's risk of developing pressure injuries [localized area of tissue damage that develops when prolonged pressure] or shear forces [horizontal force that causes the bony prominence to move across the tissue as the skin is held in place] are applied to the skin and underlying tissues) was accurately performed for one resident (Resident 1) out of 4 sampled residents. 1. Facility did not ensure Resident 1 was correctly assessed during Braden Scale assessment. 2. Facility did not ensure Nursing staff had the knowledge of scoring resident during the Braden Scale assessment. This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at a low risk of developing pressure injuries and potentially caused Resident 1 not to receive the preventive measures in developing pressure injuries. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan (a document that outlines a person's health needs and the care they required) for four out of four sampled residents (Resident 27, 71, 78, and 62) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 27 received a magic cup (a nutritious frozen supplement designed to enhance nutritional intake for individuals experiencing involuntary weight loss) on his lunch meal tray as indicated in Resident 27's physician orders and in his nutritional care plan. 2. Ensure a resident centered care plan was developed for Resident 71's vision impairment. 3. Ensure a care plan was developed for Resident 78's vision impairment. 4. Ensure the facility developed a care plan for Resident 62's medication refusal. This deficient practice had the potential to delay and negatively affect the delivery of care for Resident 71 and 78's vision impairment, Resident 27's nutritional intake, and Resident 62's overall health. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 27's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of care for two of two sampled residents (Resident 62 and 142) by failing to: 1. Ensure the nurse documented Resident 62's medications refusal on the Progress Notes. 2. Ensure the nurse did not educate Resident 62 on risk and benefit of refusing medications. 3. Ensure Resident 142's doctor was informed of a change in condition to Resident 142's urine. This deficient practice had the potential to result in delayed necessary medical care for Resident 62 and Resident 142. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 62's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 62 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 62's diagnoses included end stage renal disease (ESRD- irreversible kidney failure), peripheral vascular disease (PVD, a slow progressive narrowing of the blood flow to the arms and legs), and diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 78) was seen by an Ophthalmologist (a doctor trained in diagnosing and treating eye problems, including injury and disease) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 78 was referred to an ophthalmologist per the optometrist (healthcare provider that examine, diagnose, and treat diseases and disorders that affect eyes and vision) recommendation. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in treatment for Resident 78. Findings: During a review of Resident 78's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus ([DM] a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and a left below the knee amputation (removal of limb). During a review of Resident 78's History and Physical (H&P) dated 12/19/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 78 had the capacity to understand and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure weekly skin interdisciplinary (IDT) meetings were conducted between the dates of 1/9/2025 through 2/27/2027 after a resident had developed redness on his left hip and left anterior iliac crest (a bony prominence located on the anterior (front) portion of the left iliac bone, which is part of the pelvis) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 27). This had the potential to result in additional pain-inducing, pressure injuries (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) for Resident 27. Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 27 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 27's diagnoses included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cerebral infarction (stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) had failed) received services consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one of one resident (Resident 62), when the facility failed to remove Resident 62's pressure dressing (a bandage designed to apply pressure to a dialysis access site, to help control bleeding and promote clotting after a needle was removed) on the arteriovenous shunt (AV shunt, a surgically created connection in the arm to facilitate blood flow for dialysis) site as ordered. This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of infection (the invasion and growth of germs in the body), prolonged bleeding, and damage to the AV shunt site for Resident 62. Findings: During a review of Resident 62's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately account for and document the administration of one out of three doses of lorazepam (a controlled medication [had a high potential for abuse] to treat anxiety [a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness]) for one of one resident (Resident 77) on East Station, Medication Cart East. This deficient practice increased the risk for unsafe medication administration with the potential for diversion (situation when a medication was taken for use by someone other than whom it was prescribed) and medication errors due to lack of documentation, possibly resulting in serious health complications that could lead to hospitalization or death for Resident 77. Findings: During a review of Resident 77's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated Resident 77 had the following diagnoses which included seizure (a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident 25) was free from a significant medication error (one which caused the resident discomfort or jeopardizes his health and safety) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 administered a chewable aspirin tablet to Resident 25 without a physician's order on 3/26/2025 at 9:01 a.m. This deficient practice had the potential to result in an adverse drug reaction (unwanted undesirable effects that were possibly related to a drug) which could lead to ulceration and/or bleeding to the gastrointestinal ([GI] organ system in the human body that included mouth, throat, esophagus, stomach, small intestine, large intestine, rectum, and anus) tract, hospitalization, or death for Resident 25. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 3/26/2025 at 9:01 a.m. with LVN 3, LVN 3 crushed one chewable tablet with the intent to administer as a mixture with applesauce for Resident 25. LVN 3 was stopped by the surveyor at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection (the invasion and multiplication of microorganisms [like bacteria, viruses, etc.] in body tissues, potentially causing illness or harm) control practices for two of two residents (Resident 33 and 62) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 33's opened nebulizer mask (a plastic cup that fit over the mouth and nose to deliver liquid medication as a mist into the lungs) was placed directly on the surface of the nightstand at bedside on 3/25/2025. 2. Resident 66's dirty clothes and linen were observed on Resident 66's bed unattended on 3/26/2025 This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 33 and Resident 62 at risk for infection which could increase the morbidity (the amount of disease in a population) and mortality (the state of being subject to death) among residents. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 33's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 33 was originally admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Report an injury of unknown source within 2 hours, to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 1), who had a fractured (broken bone) right wrist on 3/3/2025. 2. Ensure the result of all investigations were reported to CDPH within five (5) working days of the incident. These failures resulted in the delayed investigation by CDPH and placed the resident at risk for further injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE].Resident 1 ' s diagnoses included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), cerebral infarction (a medical condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted, leading to the death of brain cells) and psychotic disorder with delusions (a mental health condition characterized by persistent and false beliefs (delusions)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Develop a care plan for for 1 of 4 residents, Resident 1, who had behavior of thrashing (swinging) arms and with erratic (unpredictable) behaviors. 2. Implement its policy and procedure (P&P), titled Significant Change of Condition, Response, for Resident 1, who was guarding (protecting) his right wrist and had complained of pain. These failures resulted in the lack of safe interventions and poor-quality care, resulting in the resident ' s transfer to a general acute care hospital (GACH) on 3/3/2025. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident 1 ' s diagnoses included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), cerebral infarction (a medical condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted, leading to the death of brain cells) and psychotic disorder with delusions (a mental health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were placed within residents ' reach for two of six sampled residents, (Resident 3 and Resident 4. This deficient practice could result in residents not able to call nurses for assistance in case of medical emergency (change in medical condition) and when in need of care and assistance. Findings: a) During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/1/2024 at 10:35 a.m. in Resident 3 ' s room, Resident 3 ' s call light was not visible. When curtain was moved call light was observed clipped on the curtain. The Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 5 came inside the room and took Resident 3 ' s call light off the curtain. CNA 5 stated the call light should be placed within Resident 3 ' s reach. CNA 5 stated I do not know why the call light was there (clipped in the curtain). During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records requested by one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), were released within 24 hours as indicated in the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled Residents Rights, Release of Information. This deficient practice resulted in the violation of a residents ' rights and had the potential to affect Resident 1 ' s quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (loss of cognitive function), cardia pacemaker (electrical pulses to produce heartbeat), and hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P) dated 8/1/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 1 has fluctuating capacity to understand and make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized care assessment and care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transfer one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) immediately to the general acute care hospital (GACH), on 8/2/2024, when Resident 1 had an unavoidable fall that caused Resident 1 to sustain a right distal femur fracture (thigh broken bone) and required admission to a GACH for evaluation and treatment. This deficient practice resulted Resident 1 ' s delayed transferred to the GACH on 8/3/2024, 10 hours after an X-ray (a photographic image of a part of the body) result indicated acute (sudden) comminuted supracondylar (broken bone into more than two pieces) fracture of the right distal femur, and had the potential for Resident 1 to experience severe pain, and risk for delayed care, and treatment. Findings: During an interview on 8/12/2024 at 10:50 a.m., with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated on 8/2/2024 around 3:00 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 transferred her from the wheelchair to the bed using a Hoyer lift (mechanical lift- a device used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Restorative Nursing ([RNA] nursing aid that helps residents maintain their function and joint mobility) exercises according to the physician ' s order for three of five residents (Residents 1, 2 and 5). This deficient practice placed Residents 1, 2, 3 and 5 at risk for contractures (permanent or temporary shortening of muscles, tendons, skin, and other tissues that causes joints to stiffen and prevent normal movement) and a decline in range of motion ([ROM] how far you can move or stretch a part of the body, such as a joint or a muscle). Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis that affect one side of the body, including the arms and legs) and Hemiparesis (muscle weakness). During a review of Resident ' s 1 Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 5/15/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement an individualized person-centered care plan with measurable objectives, timeframes, and interventions for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3), who had moisture associated skin damage ([MASD] skin damage caused by prolonged exposure to various sources of moisture, including urine or stool, perspiration, wound exudate, mucus, saliva, and their contents. MASD is characterized by inflammation of the skin, occurring with or without erosion or secondary cutaneous infection). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of skin treatments and skin breakdown prevention for Resident 1 and Resident 3. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a written or verbal authorization was obtained from one of three residents' (Resident 1), responsible party, prior to resident's discharge to another facility. This failure resulted in resident's primary responsible person not aware of the discharge. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing) and cognitive communication deficit (difficulty following the rules of both verbal and non-verbal communication). The admission record indicated Resident 1's family member 1 (FM1) was Resident 1's first emergency contact person and Resident 1's FM2 was the second emergency contact person. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment (problems with the ability to think, learn, remember, use judgement, and make decisions).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized person-centered care plan (document helps nurses and other team care members organize aspect of resident care) addressing a Stage III pressure ulcer (injury to the skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin which extends through the skin into deeper tissue and fat but do not reach muscle, tendon, or bone) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). The care plan was developed a month after Resident 1 was diagnosed with a Stage III pressure injury. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services for Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included of pressure injury of the sacral region (located below the lumbar spine and above the tailbone, which is known as the coccyx) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to securely store discontinued controlled medications (medications regulated under federal law) in a locked drawer that was inaccessible by residents, visitors, and staff for one of one resident (Resident 46). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the unsafe access of medications by residents, staff, and visitors that could lead to adverse reactions due to accidental ingestion of unnecessary medication and the increased risk of drug diversion (when medications are obtained or used illegally). Findings: During a review of Resident 46's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fibromyalgia (a disorder characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain accompanied by fatigue, sleep, memory and mood issues), urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in any part of the urinary system), and major depressive disorder (a mental health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignified care for one out of six sampled residents (Resident 240) when Resident 240 had thick, yellow-white-ish residue and plaque buildup on his teeth, gums, and tongue, and was not provided oral care before he was fed breakfast and lunch. These deficient practices had the potential to cause Resident 240 to exhibit feelings of self-worthlessness and sadness related to inability to eat or communicate effectively. Cross reference F684 Findings: During a review of Resident 240's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 240 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (impaired blood flow to the brain), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following cerebral infarction, and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 240's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Assessment, dated 3/19/2024, the assessment indicated that Resident 240's cognition (ability to think and reason)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the licensed nurses failed to review, update, and/or revise a care plan addressing residents' new hemodialysis (the process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body) access site for one resident out of two sampled residents (Resident 52) by failing to: 1. Update the dialysis care plan after Resident 52 had surgery (7/26/2023) for an arteriovenous fistula ([AVF] surgical connection made between an artery and a vein, typically located in the arm, and used for hemodialysis). 2. Revising the dialysis care plan interventions to address Resident 52's left arm hemodialysis access site. These deficient practices resulted in the lack of plan of care for Resident 52's hemodialysis access site care, and placed Resident 52 at risk for an unidentified complications to the hemodialysis access site. Findings: During a review of Resident 52's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dependence of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe, quality care was provided for one out of six sampled residents (Resident 204) when the facility failed to ensure the following: 1. Resident 240's oral care was performed before the first meal of the day. 2. Resident 240's blood sugar was taken, as ordered by the Physician. 3. Resident 240's lab results were relayed to the physician in a timely manner. 4. A Stat (an order to be performed within one hour) urine culture (a urine collection for testing) was collected in a timely manner. 5. A safe swallowing strategies sign was posted for Resident 240 before he was fed. These deficient practices led Resident 240 to exhibit hunger and a delay in care and treatment for Resident 240's possible leukocytosis (infection). These deficient practices also had the potential for Resident 240 to exhibit an undetected hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) or hyperglycemic (high blood sugar) episode, and for Resident 240 to develop aspiration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were repositioned to aid in the prevention of the development of pressure ulcers or the worsening of existing pressure ulcers for two out of two sampled residents (Resident 16 and 61). These deficient practices led to Resident 16 to acquire a Stage III pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss) and had the potential for Resident 61's existing Stage IV pressure ulcer (severe tissue damage in which muscle or bone may be exposed) to worsen. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 16's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 16 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (impaired blood flow to the brain), aphasia (inability to communicate), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and gastrostomy (tube extending to the stomach for feedings). During a review of Resident 16's Minimum Data Set [MDS- an assessment tool], dated 3/5/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of five sampled residents (Resident 87, 77, and 67) with limited mobility (ability to move) and range of motion [ROM, full movement potential of a joint (where two bones meet)] received services to maintain mobility and ROM. a. For Resident 87, the facility did not provide assistance with ambulation (the act of walking) in accordance with the physician orders, dated 3/13/2024. b. For Resident 77, the facility did not provide active range of motion (AROM, performance of ROM of a joint without any assistance or effort of another person) to both arms, three times per week, in accordance with the physician orders for 1/2024 and 3/2024. c. For Resident 67, the facility did not provide passive range of motion (PROM, movement of joint through the ROM with no effort from the person) to the right arm and right leg and AROM to the left arm and left leg, five times per week, in accordance with the physician orders for 3/2024. These…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to change the intravenous line (IV, a soft flexible tube placed inside a vein to administer medications or fluids) dressing in accordance with the physician's order for one of five sampled residents (Resident 190). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay of the assessment of the IV insertion site and development of infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 190's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 190 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (problem in the brain caused by chemical imbalances in the blood), end stage renal disease (ESRD, condition where kidneys are permanently unable to function), and major depressive disease (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for three of three sampled residents (Resident 39, 55, and 190) by failing to: 1. Provide two (2) liters (L, unit of volume) of oxygen in accordance with Resident 39's physician orders and care plan. 2. Label Resident 55 and Resident 190's nasal cannula (device used to deliver supplemental oxygen or increased airflow through the nose) with the open date. These deficient practices resulted in excessive levels of oxygen to Resident 39's body and had the potential to weaken Resident 39's lungs. These failures also had the potential to increase the risk for a respiratory infection. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 39's admission Record, the facility admitted Resident 39 on 3/20/2023 with diagnoses including end stage renal (kidney) disease (ESRD, condition where kidneys are permanently unable to function), dependence on renal dialysis (process of filtering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was accurately assessed before and after hemodialysis (process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body using a machine when the kidneys are not able to do own their own) treatment for one resident out of two sampled residents (Resident 74) by failing to: 1. Ensure licensed staff accurately assessed Resident 74's perma catheter (catheter placed inside a blood vessel in the neck or under collarbone and then threaded into the right side of heart, used for hemodialysis) before leaving to hemodialysis and when returning from hemodialysis. 2. Ensure licensed staff accurately documented the assessment of Resident 74's hemodialysis access site. These deficient practices had the potential for an unidentified complication after dialysis treatment such as swelling, pain, bleeding, and bruising. Findings: During a review of Resident 74's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the following: 1. The Director of Nursing (DON) did not separately work to perform duties as a Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor. 2. An RN supervisor worked for at least 8 consecutive hours. 3. The number of RN hours worked were accurately accounted for. 4. Intravenous (IV, into the vein) medications were administered for three of three residents receiving IV medications (Resident 25, Resident 90, and Resident 240). These deficient practices had the potential for assessments and IV medications to be missed, and the potential for an overall decrease in the quality of care for the residents. Findings: 1. During an interview on 3/19/2024, at 11:21 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated that she was performing the DON and the Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor duties for the shift that day (3/19/2024). During an interview on 3/20/2024, at 12:36 p.m., with Operational Resource (OR) 1, OR 1 stated the normal process for submitting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safe administration of medications for two out of six sampled residents (Resident 73 and Resident 2) when the following occurred: 1. One white pill was found on top of Resident 73's night stand. 2. Two yellow pills, one beige capsule, one white powdered medication was found spread across Resident 2's blanket while Resident 2 laid in bed. Two orange pills, one red capsule, and one crushed yellow pill was also found on Resident 2's meal tray. These deficient practices could have led to Resident 73 and Resident 2 to double dose on medications, exhibit a hypotensive (low blood pressure) or hypertensive (high blood pressure) episode, and medically related issues associated with the missed doses of the medications. These deficient practices could have also led to the increased possibility of another resident or staff member ingesting or taking the medications. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to reevaluate the medication indication of use for one of five residents (Resident 190) who received mirtazapine (an antidepressant, a medication to treat depression [mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest in life]). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 190 to receive mirtazapine for the incorrect indication and be subjected to unnecessary side effects such as dizziness, constipation, and sleepiness. Findings: During a review of Resident 190's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 190 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (problem in the brain caused by chemical imbalances in the blood), end stage renal disease (ESRD, condition where kidneys are permanently unable to function), and major depressive disease (a mental health disorder characterized by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary food storage practice in the kitchen that affected 88 out of 88 sampled residents when the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the refrigerator did not have spoiled vegetables and fruit. 2. Ensure refrigerated food items were properly labeled with a use by date or an open date. 3. Ensure the refrigerator did not have expired food. 4. Ensure lettuce was placed in a bag or a sealed container. 5. Ensure the dry storage room did not have items that were not accurately labeled. These deficient practices had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination that could lead to foodborne illness in residents that are medically compromised residents. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour observation on 3/18/2024 at 9:27 a.m., in the walk-in refrigerator, observed a bin of cucumbers that were spoiled and were sitting on a white milky substance. Observed a bin of apples that contained a few apples that were spoiled. Observed a zip lock bag that contained shredded carrots…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide accurate documentation for two of five sampled residents (Resident 77 and 67) with limited mobility (ability to move) and range of motion [ROM, full movement potential of a joint (where two bones meet)]. a. For Resident 77, the facility did not remove the Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA, certified nursing aide program that helps residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) task to perform passive range of motion (PROM, movement of joint through the ROM with no effort from the person) to Resident 77's legs in accordance with the physician order, dated 2/22/2024, discontinuing RNA for PROM to both legs. b. For Resident 67, the facility did not accurately indicate the facility staff providing the RNA treatment on 3/19/2024 in the clinical record. These deficient practices resulted in inaccurate provision of care recorded in the clinical records for Resident 77 and 67. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 77's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility nursing staff failed to ensure infection prevention practices were implemented for intravenous ([IV]- in the vein) medication therapy for three out of four sampled residents (Resident 25, Resident 91, and Resident 241) when the following occurred: 1. Resident 91's and 241's IV tubing (tubing used to administer medications directly into the vein) was not labeled with the time and date of when the IV tubing set was changed and when the tubing set expired. 2. Resident 25's IV site (a catheter than is placed in the resident's vein to administer medication) was not labeled with the date and time of when the IV was started. These deficient practices had the potential to cause sepsis (blood infection) or an infection for Residents 25, 91 and 241. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 25's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis (bone infection) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer the pneumococcal vaccine (medication that trains the body's immune system so that it can fight pneumonia [an infection that inflames the air sacs in one or both lungs]) to two of five sample residents (Resident 27 and 48), who were eligible and had consented to receive the vaccine. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the development and spread of pneumonia. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 27's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition that results in too much sugar circulating in the blood), hyperlipemia (an abnormally high concentration of fat particles in the blood), and acute kidney failure (the sudden and rapid loss of kidney's ability to filter waste and balance fluid in blood). During a review of Resident 27's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and screening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0912 — isolated
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During an observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide 80 square feet of room space per resident for 4 rooms out of 35 rooms. This deficient practice could potentially not provide residents privacy and could potentially affect residents' health and safety. Findings: During a review of the facility's Client accommodations Analysis form, undated, the form indicated four rooms in the facility did not meet the room size requirement. During an interview on 3/18/2024 at 1:31 p.m. with the Administrator, the Administrator stated the facility had four rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 20, 34, 35) that did not meet the room size requirement. The Administrator stated residents in those rooms were comfortable and had enough space for property, care, and treatments. The Administrator stated resident rooms offered residents privacy, dignity, and safety. During a review of the facility's Client Accommodation Analysis form, dated 3/19/2024, the client accommodation form indicated room [ROOM NUMBER]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accountability of 30 doses of Norco (a medication used to treat pain) 5/325 milligrams ([mg] a unit of measurement) between 1/15/2 and 1/16/24 for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had the potential to result in diversion of medication (used for any purpose other than the one intended by the prescriber) and unrelieved pain due to pain medication not being available for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet) dated 1/18/24, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness and osteomyelitis (inflammation or swelling that occurs in the bone). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H/P) dated 12/24/2023, the H/P indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control and prevention practices by failing to: 1. Ensure facility staff wear a face mask (a personal protective equipment worn covering mouth and nose to serve as a barrier to interfere direct airflow in and out of nose and mouth) when in the facility. 2. Ensure the mouth and nose were covered when face mask was worn by facility staff during direct residents ' care. This failure placed all the residents and staff at higher risk for infection, and the transmission of communicable diseases in the facility and the community. During an entrance to the facility on [DATE] at 8:30 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) was observed walking on the hallway and talking to staff and residents and had no mask on. During an observation on 12/15/2023 at 8:45 a.m., at the Nurse ' s Station 2, the following were observed: a. Certified Nurse Assistance (CNA) 1, CNA 1 was inside a resident ' s room providing activity of daily care (ADL)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection prevention and control policy and procedures (P&P) by failing to: 1. Notify the Department of Public Health (DPH) of an outbreak of coronavirus disease ([COVID-19], a highly contagious respiratory infection caused by a virus that can easily spread from person to person) in a timely manner. 2. Ensure facility Housekeeper (HSK) performed hand hygiene (cleaning hands by handwashing or using an alcohol-based hand sanitizer) after entering the covid-19 isolation room (designated area to keep residents confirmed with covid-19 separate from other residents to prevent the spread of infection) and prior to touching other clean surfaces, areas and resident rooms. These deficient practices had the potential to cause the spread of the COVID-19 in the facility and cause other residents, staff and visitors to become ill. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s face sheet (admission Record), the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurately documented records to communicate shower care provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). As a result of this deficient practice, Resident 1 potentially missed her shower day, which could put her at risk for infection related to poor hygiene. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 8/18/2023, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning such as impaired memory), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), and right below the knee amputation (a removal of a limb) of leg. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 7/14/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 1 required limited assistance (resident highly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the required room size measurement of 80 square feet ([sq. ft.]- a unit of measurement) of room space per resident in rooms with multiple residents. This deficient practice had the potential to result in not providing residents privacy and could potentially affect residents' health and safety. Findings: During a review of the facility's Client Accommodations Analysis form, dated 3/24/2025, the form indicated four rooms in the facility did not meet the room size requirement. The client accommodation form indicated the following: room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 217 sq. ft. room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 232 sq. ft. room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 238 sq. ft. room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 234 sq. ft. During an observation on 3/27/2025 at 12:37 p.m. while in room [ROOM NUMBER], the room had three beds with a wheelchair at the bedside. There was enough room space available to allow wheelchairs to be maneuvered in the room. The Room provided privacy to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$13,575 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $13,575 — penalty dated 2024-08-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CHADHA, ARINDERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2022
WILLIAMS, WILESTELAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
WILLITS, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/09/2024
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/28/2019
KEETCH, CHADIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2011
KIM, JESSEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2023
SATO, AMIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/09/2024
TWOMAGNETS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2019
PORT, BARRYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/14/2025
CARETRUST GP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
CARETRUST REIT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
CTR PARTNERSHIP LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/28/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 24%Other / private 14%

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$437per resident / day
operating cost
$13,271per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$503per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055519. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next