Fairfield Post Acute Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 308 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 121 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 93.3 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.31 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.49 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.10 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents, Resident 1 received care in accordance with professional standards of practice when facility staff did not follow physician orders and inaccurately documented medical notes during an emergent change of condition.These failures decreased the facility's potential to safely and effectively provide care to a resident with worsening health conditions.Findings:1a. Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1) did not follow a physician's order to regulate Resident 1's oxygen flow rate to 3 LPM (LPM, liters per minute, it's a measurement of how much oxygen Resident 1 received) via nasal cannula (NC-nasal cannula, oxygen tubing).A review of Resident 1's Clinical Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in May 2026 with diagnoses that included COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease- a progressive, long-term lung disease that blocks airflow and makes it difficult to breathe), and Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (a condition where the body's tissues do not receive enough oxygen and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was accurately reconciled before discharge when Resident 1 was sent home with the wrong insulin (a hormone produced by the body or given artificially to removes excess sugar from the blood) medication.This failure had the potential to cause sudden, severe hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) leading to confusion, seizures, or sudden death.Findings:A review of Resident 1's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for diagnosis including Diabetes Mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). Resident 1 was discharged home on 4/11/26.A review of Resident 1's Order summary report for 4/26, indicated he was prescribed NovoLIN R (brand name for man-made human insulin used to treat diabetes) using a FlexPen/Pen-injector (a pre-filled, disposable device used to inject…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly, when an unlabeled loose pill and three labeled blister packs (a type of unit-dose packaging with clear plastic bubbles (blisters) holding individual pills) were found on the bottom of a drawer and in the back of the drawers for one out of five sampled medication carts. These failures had the potential for medication error, misuse, or drug diversion.Findings: During an inspection of Medication Cart 5 on 1/6/26 at 12:20 p.m., one unlabeled loose pill and three labeled blister packs were found on the bottom of the drawer and behind the drawers in the back of medication cart 5.During an interview on 1/6/26 at 9:48 a.m. with Nursing Supervisor (NS), NS removed the pill found on the bottom of the drawer and confirmed there was 1 loose pill. NS also confirmed there were three labeled blister packs found behind the drawer at the back of cart 5. The NS stated the carts were cleaned regularly but admitted she did not think of looking behind the drawers. The NS confirmed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to store cookware pans and utensils in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: Frying pans were stacked wet while stored away; and, Ladles and cake slicer were found wet while stored in the drawer.These failures had potential to cause food-borne illnesses in a highly susceptible population of 97 residents who received food from the kitchen.Findings:During a concurrent initial tour observation and interview on 1/6/26 at 8:45 a.m. at the kitchen with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), several wet pans and ladles were stacked and stored at the clean and ready-to-use storage areas as indicated below:6 frying pans- different sizes6 ladles - various sizes1 cake slicerThe CDM confirmed that the 6 frying pans, 6 ladles, and 1 cake slicer were wet. CDM stated, the frying pans, ladles, and a cake slicer should have been completely air dried before being stored away.During an interview on 1/8/26 at 10 a.m. with Registered Dietician (RD), the RD stated, the expectation was: the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 7, Resident 32, Resident 53, Resident 90) were offered an advance directive (a legal document where a competent adult specifies their future medical care wishes in the event they cannot communicate them themselves, often due to illness or injury). This failure had the potential to result in the residents' medical wishes not being honored.Findings:During a review of Resident 7's admission record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 7 was admitted in November 2025 with several diagnosis including aftercare following surgical amputation (surgical removal of part or all of a body part).During a review of Resident 32's AR, the AR indicated Resident 32 was admitted in November 2025 with several diagnosis including encephalopathy (a condition where brain dysfunction occurs due to a chemical imbalance in the body, often triggered by systemic illnesses or organ dysfunction). During a review of Resident 53's AR, the AR indicated Resident 53 was admitted in December 2025 with several diagnosis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0813 — pattern
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store resident food in a safe and sanitary manner in the refrigerators for residents for a census of 97 when:One opened bottle of soda stored past their use by date,Two bottles of opened salad dressings, and one fruit spread found unlabeled,One bag of loaf of bread was unlabeled, undated, and expired; and,Opened container of clam chowder with expired use by date.These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses in a vulnerable resident population. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/8/26 at 10:30 a.m. with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), several resident food items were found in the refrigerators for residents at Nursing Station 1 and Nursing Station 2. The food items found were as follows:Nursing Station 1 refrigerator for residents:One opened bottle of soda stored past their use by date 12/27/25.Two opened salad dressings, and one fruit spread found unlabeled, undatedOpened Clam Chowder with use by date 1/7/26 and unlabeled.Nursing Station 2 refrigerator for residents:One…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection prevention measures were implemented for a census of 97 when:One facility staff did not sanitize the blood pressure (BP-measures the force of blood against artery walls) cuff in between two residents (Resident 2 and Resident 61).These failures had the potential to spread germs.Findings:A review of Resident 2's clinical record indicated Resident 2 was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis that included Chronic Viral Hepatitis C (a long term viral infection of the liver that leads to illness and can be spread by contact with the contaminated blood), Immunodeficiency (the immune system can't effectively fight infections and diseases, leading to frequent, severe infections and potentially cancer), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing).A review of Resident 61's clinical record indicated Resident 61 was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis that included Immunodeficiency,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 9) was free of unnecessary psychotropic medications (any drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts or perception) when Resident 9 did not receive a psychiatric evaluation to determine if their psychotropic medication should be continued.This failure had the potential to result in the use of an unnecessary psychotropic medication that could cause adverse consequences.During a review of Resident 9's admission record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility in November 2025 with multiple diagnosis including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). Resident 9's AR did not indicate a diagnosis of schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought) and bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs). During a review of Resident 9's physician's orders dated 11/7/25, the physician's orders indicated Resident 9…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform the weekly weights for one of the four sampled residents (Resident 1) per order and care plan. This failure exacerbated Resident 1's weight loss significantly.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Metabolic encephalopathy (when the brain does not work because of chemical imbalance or problem in the body's metabolism), Burn of Second Degree of Left Thigh due to heatstroke (heatstroke- when the body overheats dangerously from too much sun, leading to symptoms like confusion, dizziness, high fever, requiring immediate medical help.)During a review of Nutritional Risk Assessment (NRA), dated and signed by Registered Dietician (RD) on 7/8/25, the NRA indicated, .Goals: Maintain weight within +/- 5 pounds of current body weight (CBW). Resident 1's admission weight was 198 lbs. (pounds- a unit of weight measurement).During a review of order summary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care services according to professional standards of quality for one resident (Resident 1), when Resident 1 arrived to the dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) center with an empty oxygen tank. This failure decreased the facility's potential to safely provide Resident 1's oxygen therapy. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 with diagnoses including respiratory failure (a condition where there's not enough oxygen in the body) and pneumonitis (inflammation of the lung tissue). A review of Resident 1's Care plan report, dated 5/22/24, indicated Resident 1 required continuous oxygen every shift. A review of Resident 1's physician orders, dated 5/21/24, indicated Resident 1 was scheduled for dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday with pick up time from facility at 12:45 p.m. and chair time for dialysis at 1:15 p.m. The order further indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA