No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

St. Catherine Healthcare

245 E Wilshire Avenue, Fullerton, CA 92832 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (714) 871-6020 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (714) 871-6020 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0606) — cited Mar 2026
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (17% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Mar 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Mariner0.4 mi
623 N Harbor Blvd · (714) 446-8750 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
105 N Lawrence Ave · (714) 449-9300 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
410 S Lemon St · (714) 525-1881 · Call to confirm hours
Park
136 E Wilshire Ave · (714) 449-0821 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
215 N Lemon St · (714) 525-3742

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.5%10.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%4.0%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.3%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.7%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.8%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.5%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.2%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.8%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.3%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.1%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.0%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.6%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.192.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.541.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 285 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
70.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.70U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.37hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.27hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 70.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 109 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.70 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.0%CMS range 48.6–60.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.8%CMS range 8.7–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge70.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.9%CMS range 8.3–14.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.371.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
1.19
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.40
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.95
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
16.9%
Total nursing turnover
12.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 88.6 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 17% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-17)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-17 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — pattern
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of the residents when one of two volunteer staff (the Activity Volunteer) with a prior history of conviction was recruited to work with the residents. * The Activity Volunteer was a current sex offender registrant who was volunteering in the facility. This failure had the potential to put the residents at risk of harm or negative outcomes.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse: Prevention and Prohibition Against revised December 2023 showed the following:- The P&P applies to all facility staff including but not limited to employees, consultants, volunteers, students, and other caregivers who provide care and services to residents on behalf of the facility; and- All employees, temporary staff, prospective consultants, contractors, volunteers, caregivers, and students will be properly screened prior to working at the Facility. Review of the Activity Volunteer's facility volunteer application dated 8/2/24, showed a hand written response of yes to the section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement their antibiotic stewardship program to show timely physician notification for two final sampled residents (Residents 17 and 49) and three nonsampled residents (Residents 16, 47, and 93) who received antibiotics for infections that did not meet McGeer's criteria. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 47's symptoms met the criteria for a UTI, notify the physician the infection did not meet the criteria, and reassess the need for continued antibiotic therapy. * Resident 16's physician was notified the UTI infection did not meet the criteria, however there was no indication as to when the physician was notified. Additionally, the form was completed by the IP who was out of the facility at the time and returned in March 2026. * Resident 17's physician was notified the UTI infection did not meet the criteria, however there was no indication as to when the physician was notified. * Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 6) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 41) were assessed to self-administer medications. * Resident 6's bedside table was observed with a bottle of Mylanta (antacid and anti-gas medication) on top of bedside table. There was no physician's order for the Mylanta medication and no self-administration assessment for Resident 6. * Resident 41's bedside table was observed with a Biofreeze Cool the Pain (topical analgesic) medication on top of bedside table. There was no physician's order for the Biofreeze Cool the Pain and no self-administration assessment for Resident 41. These failures had the potential for the residents to administer the medications inaccurately and negatively impact the residents' well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Self Administration of Medications dated February 2021 showed it is the policy of this facility to respect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the Advance Directive and POLST were complete for one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 32). * Resident 32's Advanced Directive did not show who the resident selected as his health care agent. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the POLST completed with Family Member 1 matched the resident's wishes for life sustaining treatment as detailed in Resident 32's Advanced Directive. This failure had the potential for the resident's end of life wishes not being followed.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Advance Directives revised [DATE] showed the following:- Should the resident indicate that he or she has issued Advance Directives about his/her care and treatment, the facility will require that a copy of such directives be included in the medical record;- The facility will notify the attending physician of Advance Directives so that appropriate orders can be documented in the resident's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure two of seven final sampled residents (Residents 7 and 8) reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs. * The facility failed to document the nonpharmacological interventions to be attempted when Resident 7 had an episodes of angry outbursts. * The facility failed to ensure the episodes of anxiety were monitored for Resident 8. In addition, the facility failed to provide interventions to address Resident 8's behavior when the resident exhibited agitation and angry outbursts. These failures had the potential for adverse effects from the psychotropic medications and the potential for not providing the correct data to the prescriber to adjust the dosage of the psychotropic medications.Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 7 was initiated on 3/11/26. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 7's H&P examination dated 1/24/26, showed Resident 7 had no capacity to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive plan of care was revised to reflect the resident's current care needs and interventions for one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 5). * The facility failed to revise Resident 5's care plan to address the interventions for the left arm AV fistula. This failure posed the risk of not providing the resident with individualized and person-centered care.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care plan and care plan update revised 3/2020 showed it is the policy of this facility to ensure each resident receives quality of care and services to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical mental and psychosocial well being in accordance with the interdisciplinary comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Care plan will be initiated based on identified problems and medical change of condition. On 3/11/26 at 0808 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident 5 was observed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two licensed nurses reviewed for competency had specific competencies and standard of practice skill sets needed to provide safe and efficient nursing care. * The facility failed to ensure LVN 3 was able to demonstrate competency in the calibration of a glucometer accucheck machine (a device used to measure the concentration of glucose in the blood). * The facility failed to ensure RN 2 was able to competently administer the correct intravenous medication dosage to Resident 101. These failures had the potential to put the residents at risks for the care not provided in a safe and competent manner.Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Registered Nurse Supervisor Job Description dated 12/17/21, showed the RN must be knowledgeable of nursing and medical practices and procedures, as well as laws, regulation and guidelines that pertain to long-term care. Review of the facility's document titled Licensed Vocational Nurse/Licensed Practical Nurse Job Description…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the correct dosage of the medication was administered as per physician's order for one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 101) observed for medication administration. * RN 2 failed to ensure the correct dosage of Resident 101's IV ertapenem (antibiotic) medication was administered per physician's order. This failure posed the risk for negative health outcomes for Resident 101.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration revised 8/2021 showed the medications must be administered in accordance with the written orders of the attending physician. According to DailyMed, the most common clinically adverse effects of the ertapenem sodium medication overdosage were nausea, diarrhea, and transient dizziness. Review of the manufacturer's information titled Ertapenem (brand name Invanz), the Dosage and Frequency section showed for renal impairment: for patients with creatinine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services to ensure proper labeling of the medications for three nonsampled residents (Residents 41, 52, and 69). * The facility failed to ensure the medications for Residents 41, 52, and 69 were properly labeled with open date. This failure had the potential for the residents to have received expired medications and risk of undermining the efficacy of the stored medications.Findings: On 3/11/26 at 1606 hours, an observation of Medication Cart A and concurrent interview was conducted with LVN 3. The following was observed in Medication Cart A:- The geri-tussin (medication for cough) 100 mg/5 ml liquid bottle for Resident 41 was not labeled with an open date;- The gabapentin (medication for seizure) 250 mg/5 ml liquid bottle for Resident 52 was not labeled with an open date; and- The megestrol acetate (medication for appetite loss and severe weight loss) 40 mg/ml liquid bottle for Resident 69 was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's garbages and refuse was properly disposed for one of three garbage dumpsters. * One blue garbage dumpster was not fully closed. This failure had the potential to cause unsafe sanitary conditions and potential to harbor pests and rodents.Findings: According to the USDA Food Code 2022, Section 5-501.113 Covering Receptacles: Receptacles and waste handling units for refuse, recyclables, and returnable shall be kept covered. (B) With tight-fitting or doors if kept outside the food establishment. Review of the facility's P&P titled Miscellaneous Areas dated 2023 showed the garbage and trashcans must be inspected daily that no debris is on the ground or surrounding area, and that the lids are closed. On 3/13/26 at 0652 hours, an observation was conducted of the facility's outside dumpsters located on the side of the facility. The lid of one of the three blue garbage dumpsters was observed open and not fully closed. On 3/13/26 at 0730 hours, an observation of the facility's outside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record were complete and accurately documented for four of 19 final sampled residents (Residents 5, 32, 42, and 107). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 5's BP access site was accurately documented in the medical record. * Resident 32's Advanced Directive was missing a page and failed to show who he selected as his healthcare agent. * The facility failed to ensure the Narcotic and Hypnotic Record form was properly documented for Resident 42. * Resident 107's POLST showed the resident did not have an Advanced Healthcare Directive, however the resident did have one at her home. These failures have the potential for the residents' care needs not being met as their medical information was inaccurate and incomplete.Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Care of Residents on Renal Dialysis, Hemodialysis Access Site, Care Plan Diet/Fluid Restriction revised 6/2009 showed it is the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to implement the facility's QAPI plan and the past Recertification Survey POC for F554 and F761. * The facility failed to show audits and/or monitoring tools were completed per the facility's POC for F554 and F761. This failure had the potential for ongoing non-compliance and complete data being reviewed by the QAPI committee. Findings: During the survey process, the survey team identified repeat deficient practices from the facility's prior recertification survey conducted from 9/23/24 to 9/26/24, for F554 and F671. Review of the facility's 2024 Recertification Survey POC accepted by the department on 11/27/24, included the following:- for F554, the POC showed the Medical Records will perform chart reviews upon admission and check for any new orders. The DON or designee will report findings to the QA&A Committee monthly for six months. - for F761, the RN Supervisor/Designee will randomly check medication carts weekly for eight weeks, and then monthly to ensure proper medication storage. The DON or designee will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the infection control practices were followed. * The facility records showed Resident 47 had a UTI, when the resident's symptoms did not meet criteria for a true infection. * The facility failed to ensure the Medication Cart A's fourth small drawer was free of medication spillage. In addition, the iron liquid bottle was observed with sticky spillage. * LVN 4 failed to perform hand hygiene and change gloves after touching Resident 87's surroundings, before checking the GT and administering the medications. These failures posed the risk for transmission of disease-causing microorganisms and infections to the residents, staff, and visitors.Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Infection Prevention and Control Program revised October 2022 showed the facility will use McGeer's Criteria as a surveillance tool used to recognize the occurrent of infections, record the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-02-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop the comprehensive care plan to reflect the individual care needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident 1's alleged abuse incident on 1/9/26. This failure had the potential risk of not providing the appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to Resident 1.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Planning revised 2/2021 showed it is the policy of this facility that the IDT shall develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 1/22/26. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's H&P examination dated 10/17/25, showed the resident did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident 1's Progress Note dated 1/9/26, showed at around noon, the police came in stating the resident's wife called them and claimed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of seven final sampled residents (Resident 1) was informed of the indication for the use of medications affecting brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1's informed consent was obtained when the indication for the use of Ativan (lorazepam, a benzodiazepine class of medication used to treat anxiety) was changed in frequency in administration from every six hours to every eight hours. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1's informed consent was obtained for the use of Depakote (an anticonvulsant medication for labile mood). These failures had the potential for Resident 1 not to be informed of the medications and potential side effects of the use of Ativan and Depakote medications.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Psychotropic (medication affecting brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) Drug Use revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of seven sampled residents (Residents 1) was free from unnecessary psychotropic (medication affecting brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1 was adequately monitored for the Depakote medication. This failure posed risk for Resident 1 to cause potential harm from adverse consequences and a significant decline in functioning. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Psychotropic Drug Use revised 1/2023 showed it is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents who have not used psychotropic drugs are not given these drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record. These residents will be referred to the facility's Psychotropic Drug Review Committee and/or the Psychiatrist to ensure: a. Psychotropic medication was prescribed to treat a specific…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 5) reviewed for falls received the necessary care and services for the resident at risk for fall. * The facility failed to monitor and initiate a care plan when Resident 5 reported a fall on 9/1/25. This failure had the potential for the delay in providing the necessary care and services and posed a risk for Resident 5 to sustain serious injury.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Psychotropic Drug Use not dated showed it is the policy of this facility to investigate the circumstances surrounding each resident fall and implement actions to reduce the incidence of additional falls and minimize potential for injury. If the resident sustains a fall, a Risk Management Assessment is completed to determine the cause of the fall, and an IDT meeting is also completed to identify internal and external factors that might have contributed to the fall. The care plan or an update to an existing care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P, the facility failed to ensure the protocols were followed for oxygen administration for four of four sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4). * Residents 2, 3, and 4 were administered with more than the liters per minute ordered by the physician. * Resident 1's MAR failed to show documentation of the administration of the oxygen PRN. These failures had the potential for adverse respiratory outcomes and resulted in inaccurate administration records for the residents. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Oxygen Administration reviewed 2/2023 showed the oxygen shall be administered as ordered by the physician. Review of the facility's P&P titled Guidelines For Medication Administration (undated) showed the medication administration shall be recorded on the appropriate documentation record. 1. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 6/6/25. Resident 2 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of ninesampled residents (Resident 2). * The facility failed to timely provide and administer Resident 2's medications as per the physician's orders on 11/26 and 11/27/24. * The facility failed to follow up and notify the physician regarding Resident 2 of not receiving his medications due to pending delivery status of the ordered medications. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the resident's health condition and well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Prescriber Medication Orders dated 1/2019 showed the prescriber shall be contacted for direction when delivery of a medication will be delayed, or medication is not available. new medications except for emergency or stat medications are ordered as follows: the first dose of medication is scheduled to be given after the next regularly scheduled pharmacy delivery to the care center. If needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure three of nine sampled residents (Residents 3, 4, and 5) remained free from accident hazards. * Resident 3's fall risk care plan showed the interventions including for the resident's bed to be in the lowest position and for the bilateral floor mats. However, the bed was not in the lowest position and the floor mat was folded up against the wall. * Resident 4's fall risk care plan addressing the resident's actual fall showed interventions including to maintain a clear pathway, free of obstacles, needs a safe environment: floor free from spills and/or clutter. However, the bedside table was placed on top of the floor mat next to the resident's bed. * Resident 5's fall risk care plan addressing the resident's actual fall showed interventions including for the resident's bed to be in the lowest position, for bilateral floor mats, and to maintain a clear pathway, free of obstacles, needs a safe environment: floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitation requirements were met in the kitchen when: * The facility failed to ensure the thawing process for meats was followed as per the facility's P&P. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils and equipment were stored or kept in sanitary conditions. * The facility failed to ensure the food preparation equipment were in good condition. * The facility failed to remove a bag of ham with freezer burns. * The facility failed to ensure a food preparation sink had an air gap for back flow prevention. These failures had the potential to pose the risk for exposure to food-borne illnesses in a medical vulnerable population of 86 that received food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Diet Order Tally Report- All Special Diets dated 9/3/24, showed 86 of 90 residents received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Thawing of Meats dated 2023 showed thawing the meat could be done…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the infection control practices designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of infections were implemented as evidenced by: * The facility failed to implement their infection control surveillance program for January through August 2024. The facility conducted surveillance of resident infections based on whether the residents were prescribed antimicrobials. Residents who were not prescribed antimicrobials were not included in the facility's infection control surveillance program. * The facility failed to accurately track and monitor for the infections for February, May, and June 2024. * The facility failed to ensure the infection control practices were implemented on a resident with transmission-based precautions. * The facility failed to ensure the facility staff performed hand hygiene during the GT dressing change for one of 18 final sampled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to determine if it was safe for one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 77) to self-administer medications. * Resident 77 was observed to have medications inside a medicine cup at the bedside. Resident 77 did not have an assessment, a physician's order, or a care plan problem addressing the self-administration of medications. This faiure had the potential for Resident 77 to administer medications inaccurately. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Self Administration of Medications dated 2/2021 showed it is the policy of the facility to respect the wishes of alert, competent residents to self-administer prescribed as allowable under state regulations. If a resident desires to participate in self-administration, the interdisciplinary team will assess and periodically re-evaluate the resident based on change in the resident's status. If the resident is a candidate for self-administration of medications,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure recommendations from the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) level II determination was followed up, as per the facility P&P and incorporated into the resident's plan of care for one of two final sampled resident (Resident 8) reviewed for PASARR. This failure had the potential for Resident 8 not receiving the adequate care that was recommended by PASARR level II determination and evaluation report assessed by an appropriate state-designated authority. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled PASRR revised 7/22 showed after admission IDT members will review the Level I PASRR assessment for accuracy and the need for PASRR Level II referral. Based upon the assessment, the facility would ensure proper referral to appropriate state agencies for the provision of specialized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate care and services were provided related to the use of a GT for one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 65). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 65's GT was checked for placement prior to medication administration, flushed with at least 5 ml of water between each medication as per the facility's P&P, and flushed with 20 to 30 ml of water following medication administration as per the physician's order. This failure had the potential for GT blockage affecting the resident's health and well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration - Enteral Tubes dated 1/2019 showed the facility assures the safe and effective administration of enteral formulas and medications. Enteral tubes are flushed before administering medications and after all medications have been administered with at least 30 ml of water. The P&P also showed to verify the tube placement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services related to a PICC line for one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 537). * The facility failed to obtain the measurement of the right upper arm circumference upon admission and dressing changes. In addition, the facility failed to develop a care plan problem to address the use of a PICC line catheter. These failures posed the risk for the resident to development complication such as catheter migration and dislodgement. Findings: According to the literature titled Nursing Advanced Skills dated 2023 in the National Library of Medicine's database, showed if a PICC line is in place, arm circumference is also measured each shift and results compared to previous readings. If arm circumference consistently increases, a deep vein thrombosis may be suspected. Accurate documentation of site assessment and related monitoring are essential. Medical record review for Resident 537 was initiated on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to attain and maintain the highest well-being for one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 63). * The facility failed to monitor Resident 63's fluid restriction as per the physician's order. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Resident 63's dialysis access site was assessed prior and after dialysis treatments. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Dialysis (Renal), Pre and Post Care revised 1/2020 showed it is the policy of the facility to assist resident in maintaining homeostasis pre- and post-renal dialysis, assess and maintain patency of renal dialysis access, and assess resident daily for function related to renal dialysis. Dialysis access should be assessed upon return to the facility for patency, and any unusual redness or swelling. Documentation: assess care given,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement alternative measures prior to the use of bed rails for two of 18 final sampled residents (Residents 63 and 537). This failure created the potential to put the residents at risk for entrapment and serious injury. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Bedrail Assessment revised 8/2017 showed it is the policy of the facility to attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail. After the facility has attempted alternatives to bed rails and determined that these alternatives failed to meet the resident's assessment needs, the facility IDT will assess the resident for risks of entrapment and possible benefits of using the bed rail. 1. On 9/23/24 at 0800 hours, Resident 63 was observed sitting on the bed with the bilateral bed rails elevated. Medical record review for Resident 63 was initiated on 9/23/24. Resident 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 7) was provided the medications as ordered by the physician. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 7 had a physician's order for nasal moisturizing spray. This failure had the potential of not meeting the resident's needs. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administration of Drugs revised 2/2022 showed it is the policy of the facility that medications shall be administered as prescribed by the attending physician. Medications must be administered in accordance with the written orders of the attending physician. On 9/25/24 at 0930 hours, Resident 7 was observed to have three bottles of Nasal Moisturizing Spray inside her bedside top drawer. Medical record review for Resident 7 was initiated on 9/25/24. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 7's Self-Administration of Medications Evaluation dated 8/23/24, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure for the safe storage of the medications and supplies. * The IV Cart was observed to contain the expired supplies along with other supplies without a manufacturing or expiration date. * An opened bottle of Gerilanta (a laxative medication) was observed in Medication Cart 2 with no open date. These failures had the potential to result in unsafe administration of the medications. Findings: a. On [DATE] at 0827 hours, an inspection of the IV Cart was initiated with RN 4. The following items were observed in the IV Cart: - 78 Red Plus Luer Lock Caps with no manufacturing or expiration dates, - five [NAME] Vial Mate Adapter with no manufacturing or expiration dates, - seven BD Vacutainer Luer Lock Access Device with no manufacturing or expiration dates, - two BD Blue Insyte Autoguard Winged Catheters with the expiration dates of [DATE] and [DATE]. RN 4 verified the above findings. b. On [DATE] at 1135 hours, an inspection of Medication Cart 2 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed when fortified (additional nutrients added through foods such as butter and cream) diets were not followed for one nonsampled resident (Resident 19). This failure had the potential for Resident 19 to not receive the diet as planned which may lead to compromised nutritional status. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Fortification of Food: Increasing Calories and/or Protein in the Diet dated 2023 showed the enrichment of foods would be done on an individual basis for residents who cannot consume adequate amounts of calories and/or protein to sustain their weight or nutrition status. Identification of the residents in need of fortification would be done by the facility RD or the FNS Director. The physician would then order a fortified diet. Calories and/or protein would be added to selected foods. The facility RD or FNS Director would select the fortification method…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure dietary texture guidelines were followed as per the facility's P&P, for one nonsample resident (Resident 19) who was on a pureed diet. This failure had the potential to lead to choking or aspiration (a condition in which food, liquids, saliva, or vomit is breathed into the airway) for Resident 19. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Regular Pureed Diet dated 2020 showed the pureed diet is a regular diet that has been designed for residents who have difficulty chewing and/or swallowing. The texture of the food should be of a smooth and moist consistency and able to hold its shape. Medical record review for Resident 19 was initiated on 9/24/24. Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), oropharyngeal phase (from the oropharynx to the esophagus). Review of Resident 19's Order Summary Report dated 9/25/24, showed a physician's order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the education was provided to the staff and family/visitor on safe food handling of outside food as per the facility's P&P. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses to the medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food brought from outside sources. Findings: Review of CMS S&C-09-39 dated 5/29/09, showed the residents have the right to choose to accept food from visitors, family, friends, or other guests according to their rights to make choices. The CMS guideline further shows the facility has the responsibility under the food safety regulation to help the visitors to understand safe food handling practices such as not holding or transporting foods containing perishable ingredients at temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Review of the facility's P&P titled Foods Brought by Family and Visitor revised 7/21/21, showed foods brought to a resident by family/visitors must be accepted by the resident, inspected before facility storage, and stored and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement their antibiotic stewardship program when the facility failed to conduct an assessment for the McGeer's criteria to determine the true infection. This failure had the potential for inaccurately identifying for true infections and potentially inhibited the residents' physicians from discontinuing the unnecessary antimicrobials. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Infection Prevention and Control Program: Antibiotic Stewardship dated 9/2017 showed it is the policy of the facility to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program that is incorporated in the overall Infection Prevention and Control Program which will promote appropriate use of antibiotics while optimizing the treatment of infections at the same time reducing the possible adverse events associated with antibiotic use. This policy has the potential to limit antibiotic resistance in the post- acute care setting, while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to complete the post fall neuro-checks at the specific time frames as per the facility's 72 hours Neuro-check Monitoring process for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience medical complications which could go unnoticed post fall. Findings: Review of the facility's 72 hours Neuro-check Monitoring showed the neuro-checks must be monitored every 30 min for two times, every hour for three times, every two hours for two times, every four hours for four times, and every eight hours for six times. Medical record review for Resident 1 was conducted on 6/4/24. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, OPD, lack of coordination, difficulty in walking, cognitive communication deficits, muscle weakness, and osteoarthritis. Review of Resident 1's progress note dated 5/31/24 at 0300 hours, showed Resident 1 fell…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitation requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the measuring buckets used for food portioning were air dried prior to storing. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils were clean, free of food particles, and not worn out. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the form CMS-672 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents completed by the facility dated 11/30/21, showed 69 of 77 residents residing in the facility received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. According to the USDA Food Code 2017, Section 4-901.11, Equipment and Utensils, Air-Drying Required, items must be allowed to drain and air-dry before being stacked or stored. Stacking wet items prevents them from drying and may allow an environment where microorganism can begin to grow. On 12/2/21 at 1301 hours, during a tray line observation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to maintain the infection control practices to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections during a COVID-19 facility outbreak. * The facility failed to follow timely reporting of a COVID-19 outbreak to local and state health agencies. * The facility failed to follow the infection control practices in the clean linen area. These failures had the potential to delay response time and containment of a COVID-19 outbreak. Findings: 1. Review of the County of Orange Health Care Agency - Public Health Services' document for Reportable Disease Conditions revised March 2020, showed to report COVID-19 immediately by telephone. The document showed the contact numbers for reporting, including a number for reporting on holidays, weekends, and after hours. Review of the facility's P&P titled Surveillance of Infections and Reporting revised September 2017 showed any resident or staff with suspected or diagnosed as having a reportable communicable/infectious disease shall be promptly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to accurately and timely identify and report CAI and HAI cases. This failure had the potential of not accurately identifying infections and timely notification to the health care provider resulted in inaccurate data being reviewed by the Infection Control Committee. Findings: According to the CDC, repeated and/or improper use of antibiotics was the primary cause of the proliferation of drug-resistant bacteria. Each time a person uses antibiotics, the sensitive bacteria are killed; however, resistant bacteria may result. These resistant bacteria may then grow and multiply. When the antibiotics fail to work, the consequences include longer lasting illnesses, extended hospital stays, and the need for more expensive and toxic medications. Some resistant infections can even cause death. Review of the facility's P&P titled Infection Control and Control Program revised September 2017 showed the following: * Ongoing monitoring for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-07 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to properly obtain the informed consent (permission granted in the knowledge of the possible consequences) from the responsible party/POA (persons designated to make decisions on behalf of the residents) for one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 22). * A verbal consent for medical treatment and influenza (a contagious respiratory illness caused by flu viruses spread mainly by coughing, sneezing, and close contact) vaccine administration was obtained from Resident 22 who was assessed by the physician as not able to make medical decisions. The facility failed to ensure the consent for medical treatment and influenza vaccination was obtained from Resident 22's responsible party. This failure placed Resident 22 at risk for making health care decisions when she was not able to understand the benefits and reasonable risks of medications or treatment, and reasonable available alternatives based on the resident's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 18). Resident 18 was administered guiafenesin instead of the dextrometorphan guiafenesin ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential for adverse outcomes to the resident. Findings: On 12/2/21 at 0752 hours, a medication administration observation was conducted with LVN 1. LVN 1 was observed administering guaifenesin (a cough medication used to thin secretions) 200 mg to Resident 18. Medical record review for Resident 18 was initiated on 12/2/21. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 18's physician's orders showed an order dated 11/28/21, to administer Tussin DM Syrup 10-100 mg/5ml dextromethorphan-guaifenesin (a cough suppressant and to thin secretions) 10 ml every 6 hours as needed for cough. On 12/2/21 at 1020 hours, a concurrent observation, interview, and medical record review was conducted with LVN 1. LVN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for the GT feeding of one of 18 final sampled residents (Residents 21). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 21 received the accurate amount of enteral feeding as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential for not meeting the resident's nutritional needs Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Enteral Formulas, Administration of Closed System revised 2/2021 showed it is the policy of the facility that all residents requiring tube feedings will be set up on continuous feeding pumps, after appropriate diagnoses have been obtained for justification of pump, administering adequate tube feeding formula according to established criteria outcomes, utilizing closed system products when applicable. The policy provides a means to safely administer a complete nutritional feeding to the resident using a premixed formula in a closed container system protecting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and services to one nonsampled resident (Resident 36). * Resident 36 was administered oxygen without a physician's order. In addition, Resident 36's oxygen tubing touching the floor. These failures had the potential to put Resident 36 at risk for negative health outcomes and adverse effects of the improper care and administration of oxygen. Findings: According to the facility's P&P title Oxygen Administration revised date 1/2016 showed it is the policy of this facility that oxygen therapy is administered as ordered by the physician. On 11/30/21 at 1117 hours, and 12/1/21 at 0755 hours, Resident 36 was observed being awake in bed and receiving oxygen via nasal cannula (a small, flexible tube that contains two open prongs for oxygen delivery intended to sit just inside the nostril) at two liters per minute. Resident 36's oxygen tubing was observed touching the floor.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate pain management for one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 280). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 280's pain was addressed when she reported a pain level of 7 (severe pain) on a pain scale of 0-10 (with 0=no pain and 10=worst pain). Resident 280 had reported severe pain with a pain level of 7 multiple times but was only provided a pain medication prescribed by the physician for moderate pain (pain level of 4-6). This failure had the potential to affect the resident's well-being and unnecessary pain. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 280 was initiated on 11/30/21. Resident 280 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 280's H&P examination dated 11/23/21, showed Resident 280 had sustained an ankle fracture with pending surgical intervention. Review of Resident 280's Order Summary Report dated 12/7/21, showed the following pain management orders: - Monitor pain level every shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-07 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment for entrapment, alternative for the use of side rails and the care plan was completed for one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 59). * Resident 59 was observed with bilateral side rails. The facility failed to ensure the entrapment assessment, physician's order, and care plan problem were initiated prior to its use. Failure to establish a comprehensive approach for the use of bed rails posed a potential risk for residents including entrapment and/or injury due to lack of proper installation and preventive maintenance, and not meeting resident needs by informing them of risk and benefits. Findings: According to FDA.gov, Bed Rail Safety dated 8/30/18, deaths and serious injuries related to side rail entrapment have occurred with the use of side rails. Review of the facility's P&P titled Guidance: Bed Rails dated 1/2021 showed the facility would assess the resident for the use of bed side rails, grab bars as needed and with a change of condition that may warrant the use of bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 59's) medical record was complete. * Resident 59's medical record did not include the physician's progress notes. This failure had the potential for the physician's plan of care for the resident to not be effectively communicated to the interdisciplinary team. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 59 was initiated on 11/30/21. Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 59's medical record failed to include Resident 59's physician's progress notes. On 12/7/21 at 1459 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review was conducted with the DON. The DON stated the physician documented Resident 59's progress on the paper records. The DON verified the progress notes were not found in Resident 59's medical records. On 12/7/21 at 1537 hours, an interview was conducted with the Medical Records Director. The Medical Records Director was not able to locate any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-03-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to protect the residents' identifiable information.* The facility's survey results binder for public viewing included three confidential resident rosters. This failure resulted in confidential residents' information being accessible to the public.Findings: On 3/17/26 at 1019 hours, the Survey Inspection Results binder was observed on top of the Nursing Station 1 countertop and was posted for public view. Review of the Survey Inspection Results binder (undated) showed three Confidential Resident Rosters (a list which identified the names of the residents by their identifiers given for surveys to protect the residents' identities) for the following surveys:- a Concurrent Relicensing and Recertification Survey roster dated 9/24/24 - 9/26/24, with six residents identifiers and their names;- an Abbreviated Survey dated 7/9/25, with two resident identifiers and their names; and - an Abbreviated Survey dated 2/5/26, with three resident identifiers and their names. The rosters were identified as being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and services for one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 49). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 49's nasal cannula tubing was dated and labeled as per the facility's P&P. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the nasal cannula tubing was stored in a set-up bag when not in use for Resident 49. This failure had the potential for the residents not to receive the appropriate care and may negatively impact the resident's medical conditions.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Use of Oxygen revised 5/2021 showed it is the policy of this facility to promote resident safety in administering oxygen. The oxygen cannula or mask will be changed at least every seven (7) days, as well as the disposable humidifier. The tubing, masks, humidifiers, and other disposables used for oxygen administration will be dated in an identifiable fashion. Labeled and dated bags should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and the facility's P&P review, the facility failed ensure the accuracy of the MAR for one of nine sampled residents (Resident 2). This failure had the potential for the resident's care needs not being met. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Documentation dated 5/2007 showed the resident's clinical record is concise and accurate account of treatment, care, response to care, signs, symptoms, and progress of the resident's condition. Closed medical record review for Resident 2 was initiated on 12/6/24. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE],for respite care and was transferred to theacute care facility on 12/2/24. Review of Resident 2's H&P examination dated 11/26/24, showed Resident 2 had fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident 2's Order Summary Report dated 11/25/24, showed to administer carvedilol oral tablet 6.25 mg-give 0.5 mg by mouth two times a day for hypertension and ezetimibe tablet 10 mg-give one tablet by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to properly obtain the informed consents (permission granted in the knowledge of the possible consequences) for the use of psychotropic medications (medications affecting brain activity) and treatments from the responsible party (person designated to make decisions on behalf of the residents) for one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 23). This failure posed the risk for Resident 23 and their responsible parties to not be informed of their medications and the potential side effects. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care and Treatment, Informed Consents revised 5/19 showed the residents who has a physician's order related for the use of psychotropic medications should not be initiated until an informed consent was obtained. Medical record review for Resident 23 was initiated on 9/25/24. Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 23's Physician Progress Note dated 9/3/24, showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to obtain and maintain copies of the advance directive in the medical record for one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 10). This failure had the potential for confusion or failure to provide care and life sustaining measures in accordance with the residents' treatment wishes. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Advance Directives revised 11/2019 showed it is the policy of the facility that a resident's choice about advance directives will be recognized and respected. Prior to, upon, or immediately after admission, the Social Services staff or through IDT meeting will ask residents and/or their family members, about the existence of any advance directives. Should the resident indicate that he or she has issued advance directives about his/her care and treatment, the facility will require that a copy of such directives be included in the medical record. The care plan team will periodically, at least quarterly,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of medication administration documented on the MAR for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure posed the risk of having error in medical care and delay in treatment. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration General Guidelines revised 1/2019 showed the individual who administers the medication dose records the administration on the resident's MAR directly after the medication is given and when PRN medications are administered, date and time of administration, dose, route of administration, complaint and results achieved from giving the dose are documented. Medical record review for Resident 1 was conducted on 6/4/24. Review of the nurses' notes dated 5/31/24 at 1104 hours, show the resident had a new order for Norco 10 mg/325 mg one time for severe pain. Review of the E-kit log dated 5/31/24, showed Norco 10 mg/325 mg was taken out from the E-kit on 5/31/24 at 1110 hours. However, review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2021-12-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the garbage and refuse were properly stored in one of three garbage dumpster. The lid of the one garbage dumpster was left partially open. This failure had the potential to harbor pests or rodents which carry diseases. Findings: According to the US Food Code 2013, 5-501.113, Covering Receptacles, receptacle units for refuse shall be kept covered with tight fitting lids after they are filled. On 12/2/21 at 0935 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director. One dumpster located adjacent to the kitchen was observed with the lid partially propped open. A garbage bag filled with used boxes was observed sticking out of the dumpster, preventing the garbage lid from closing completely. The Maintenance Director verified the findings. The Maintenance Director stated the lids had to be fully closed to prevent flies, rats, and other animals from getting to it and to prevent contamination.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
FARUKHI, MOHAMMADIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
LOOPER, WILLIAMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
WILLITS, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/15/2019
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/15/2021
KEETCH, CHADIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2011
PORT, BARRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/09/2024
SATO, AMIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/09/2024
245 EAST WILSHIRE AVENUE, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/31/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+21.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 57%Medicare 32%Other / private 11%

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$424per resident / day
operating cost
$12,904per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$540per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055689. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next