Pacific Haven Subacute And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 255 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 85.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 87 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 93.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.23 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.37 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.77 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-11-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, closed medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the RNs were properly trained on the administration and preparation of IV medications, as evidenced by: * The Nursing Skills Competency Skills Checklist for the RNs did not include the reconstitution (process of adding specific amount and type of sterile liquid to a powered medication to create a usable solution for IV administration) of an IV medication. * RN 3 did not receive training on the administration of medications containing amphotericin B (powerful antifungal medication used to treat serious, potentially life-threatening fungal infections). In addition, RN 3 did not research information about the amphotericin B liposomal or Amphotericin B medications, prior to administering the medication for the first time. This failure resulted in a medication error and contributed to the death of Resident 1.Findings: a. Review of the facility's P&P titled Intravenous Therapy dated 2/2020…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide the pharmaceutical services to ensure the accurate medication dispensing and administration for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) as evidenced by: * Pharmacy 1 dispensed 350 mg of amphotericin B (powerful antifungal medication used to treat serious, potentially life-threatening fungal infections), instead of 350 mg of amphotericin B liposome (a different formulation of amphotericin B with different dosing requirements) as ordered by Resident 1's physician. * Pharmacy 1 dispensed a 250 ml bag of D5W (intravenous solution of 5% dextrose in water), which was intended for use with the amphotericin B liposomal (AmBisome). However, amphotericin B was dispensed in error and would have required 3500 ml for the medication to be reconstituted properly to the correct concentration. * Resident 1 received the amphotericin B 350 mg via IV infusion at a rate 2-3 times the recommended rate of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the abuse allegations were thoroughly investigated for one of three sampled residents (Resident 6) reviewed for abuse. * The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation into Resident 6's abuse allegation prior to allowing CNAs 5 and 6 to return to work. This failure had the potential to leave the vulnerable residents for further abuse, mistreatment, and injury.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against revised 12/2023 showed it is the policy of this facility that each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, exploitation and mistreatment. Under the Investigation section showed after receiving the allegation, and during and after the investigation, the Administrator will ensure that all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm. The facility will conduct…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review,and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents reviewed for dining (Resident 1) received food prepared in a form to meet the resident's individual dietary needs. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1 was provided with the chopped vegetables as per the physician's diet order. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 not liking the food based on the dietary modification and could affect the resident's quality of life. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Nutrition Management of Dysphagia dated 2023 showed in the section for dysphagia mechanical diet, all cooked vegetables should be chopped approximately half inch and cooked, soft to a mashable texture. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 6/12/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's H&P examination dated 5/25/25, showed Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services to ensure the proper storage, labeling, and disposal of medications. * The facility failed to ensure the expired supply was removed from the medication cart, the medication was labeled, and the supplies were clean and sanitary for Medication Cart A. * The facility failed to ensure the supplies in the cart were kept in clean and sanitary manner and the expired supplies were removed from the current supplies from Medication Cart B. * The facility failed to ensure the internal medications were not mixed with external medications for Medication Cart C. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the non-controlled medication was not stored with the controlled medication inside Medication Cart C. * The facility failed to ensure the expired supplies were removed from the medication and the supplies were kept in clean and sanitary manner for Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4.a. On 4/29/25 at 1100 hours, Room A's resident closet contained a disposable brief stored on the floor, exposed, unwrapped, and touching the shoe box and splint. The resident's diaper was disorganized. Linen was placed underneath the chair leg, and the diaper was exposed and lying on the floor of the closet. On 4/29/25 at 1400 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with LVN 11. LVN 11 verified the above findings and stated the staff should have organized and cleaned the residents' closet. LVN 11 acknowledged the potential for contamination as the diaper, gown, and linen were touching the floor and chair legs. b. On 4/29/25 at 1055 hours, Room C's resident closet had a wheelchair cushion stored on the floor of the closet. The cushion was dusty and had small pieces of wood debris. On 4/29/25 at 1130 hours, Room C's resident closet for Resident 63 contained an exposed diaper and the belt gait and clothing were disorganized On 4/29/25 at 1135 hours, Room C's resident closet for Resident 58…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 30) was safe to self-administer a medication. * There was no assessment or care plan to address Resident 30's self-administration of medications when the resident had two bottles of Alphagan eye drops (medication used to lower high eye pressure) at the bedside and had been self-administered this medication. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being and administer the medications inaccurately. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Self-Administration of Medications (undated) showed each resident will be informed of his/her right to self-administer medication. The residents will be informed that they have a right to self-administer drugs upon admission. Medical record review for Resident 30 was initiated on 4/29/25. Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 30's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 78) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 78's prescription for lorazepam (antianxiety medication) had documentation of the physician's clinical rationale to show when the PRN order was extended beyond 14 days. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the Resident 78's well-being from the continued use of the lorazepam medication. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Psychotropic Medications revised 12/2023 showed the following: - Based on comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. Except for PRN orders for antipsychotic medications, if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN psychotropic medication order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop the comprehensive plans of care to reflect the individual care needs for two of 19 final sampled residents (Residents 14 and 78) and one of three residents reviewed for closed records (Resident 8). * The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident 78's use of padded side rails. In addition, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident 78's use of IV device. * The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident 14's use of the sequential compression device. * The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident 8's DM. These failures had the potential risk of not providing appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to these residents. Findings: 1. On 4/29/25 at 1056 and 1454 hours, 4/30/25 at 1118 and 1609 hours, 5/1/25 at 0845, 1333, and 1601 hours, and 5/2/25 at 0837 and 0858 hours, Resident 78 was observed in bed with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the individualized and ongoing activity program to meet the needs and interests for one of two final sampled residents (Resident 78) reviewed for activities. * The facility failed to provide the activities for Resident 78 which met the resident's identified interests such as watching TV. This failure had the potential for Resident 78 to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: On 4/29/25 at 1056 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident 78 was observed awake in bed. The TV was turned off, and there was no other sensory stimulation provided for Resident 78. Medical record review for Resident 78 was initiated on 4/29/25. Resident 78 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 78's Activity Assessment - V2 dated 3/13/25, showed Resident 78's current activity interests included watching TV/movies, keeping up with the news, and listening to music. Review of Resident 78's Care Plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to the reported injury was addressed and reported to the resident's responsible party and the physician for one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 6). This failure posed the risk of Resident 6's injury to worsen. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 6 was initiated on 5/1/25. Resident 6 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 6's H&P examination dated 3/24/25 showed Resident 6's diagnoses included sepsis, Parkinson's Disease, schizophrenia, and dementia. Resident 6 had no capacity to understand and make decisions. On 5/1/25 at 1046 hours, a concurrent observation and interview for Resident 6 was conducted with CNA 1. CNA 1 verbalized Resident 6 was alert but confused and was able to propel himself in his wheelchair. When asked about the skin conditions for Resident 6, CNA 1 verbalized Resident 6 did not have any skin conditions. However, Resident 6 was observed with a red colored circular wound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary treatment and services were provided to maintain or improve their ROM functions and prevent further declining of the ROM functions for two of two final sampled residents (Residents 38 and 44) reviewed for ROM functions. * Residents 38 and 44 did not receive the restorative nursing treatment daily as ordered by the physician. This failure posed the risk for the residents to develop complications from immobility and not achieve their highest practicable level of independence. Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 38 was initiated on 4/29/25. Resident 38 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 38's H&P examination dated 12/4/24, showed Resident 38 had functional quadraplegia (paralysis). Resident 38 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident 38's care plan dated 4/30/25, showed Resident 38 was at high risk for decline in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $963K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA