Beachside Nursing Center
7781 Garfield Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 59 certified beds · (714) 847-9671 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.7% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.8% | 1.2% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.4% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.4% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.3% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.4% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
69.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 418 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 74.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 110 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 69.5%CMS range 65.2–73.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.1%CMS range 9.7–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 74.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 75.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 70.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 11.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 55.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.9%CMS range 6.0–10.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.05 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 55.8 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.31 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.59 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to one of three sampled residents (Resident 2). * The facility failed to ensure appropriate notifications were made, an assessment was completed, a care plan was developed, and the resident's unusual behavior was monitored and documented in response to Resident 2's involvement in an allegation of abuse. This failure had the potential to result in ineffective provision of care and negative outcomes for the resident. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Acute Condition Changes - Clinical Protocol dated October 2010 showed the nursing staff will contact the physician based on the urgency of the situations. The nursing staff will make pertinent observations and collect appropriate information to report to the physician. The nursing staff and physician will discuss possible causes based on the resident history, current symptoms, medication regimes, and existing test results. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain the infection control practices to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections. * The facility failed to ensure an EBP signage and PPE cart were available by Resident 3's entrance door. * The facility failed to ensure the EBP was followed for Resident 3 when LVN 1 and CNA 1 failed to wear a gown during wound care. These failures posed the risk of not preventing the spread of infection in the facility and posed the risk of unsanitary environment.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Infection Prevention - Employee Exposure (undated) showed EBP may be implemented but not limited to:- Residents with the presence of indwelling devices (e.g., urinary catheter, feeding tubes,endotracheal or tracheostomy tube, vascular catheters);- Residents with the presence of chronic wounds;- Residents with functional disability and total dependence on others for assistance with ADL is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and closed medical record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to reflect the individual care needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident 1's pacemaker (a small, battery-operated device implanted under the skin, usually near the collarbone, to regulate a slow or irregular heart rhythm using electrical impulses). This failure posed the risk of the resident not receiving the appropriate treatment and services). Findings:On 4/3/26, CDPH received a complaint related to Resident 1's care.Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 4/15/26. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident 1's acute care hospitalist H&P examination dated 3/25/26, showed Resident 1's diagnoses included post status cardiac pacemaker placement.Review of Resident 1's Care Plan Report dated 3/29-4/1/26, failed to show a care plan problem was initiated to address Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure food safety guidelines related to food storage were followed in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the food items past the use by date were discarded. This failure increased the risk for food borne illness for 56 residents who received food prepared in the facility's kitchen.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Labeling and Dating of Foods dated 2023 showed all food items in the storeroom, refrigerator, and freezer need to be labeled and dated for either food safety or product rotation. The use by date will be the absolute date in which the food must be consumed or discarded by the facility. On 2/22/26 at 0801 hours, during the initial tour of the kitchen, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with the Diet Lead. The following were observed:a. The Reach-in Refrigerator 1 by the dry storage area had a container with four packs of sliced cheese was observed with a use by date of 2/20/26. The Diet Lead verified the findings and removed the sliced cheese from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurately maintained for two of 15 final sampled residents (Residents 1 and 33) and two of three residents (Residents 78 and 90) reviewed for closed records. * The facility failed to document in the medical record all the observations, assessments, vital signs, interventions, and change in condition, when Resident 78 expired in the facility. In addition, the facility failed to document the names and titles of the facility staff who conducted these observations and assessments and performed the interventions. * The facility failed to ensure the physician's orders for the route of medication administration for Resident 1 were accurate. The medication route was ordered for oral administration instead of via GT. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 33's wound treatment and monitoring was documented according to the facility's policy. * The facility failed to ensure resident's IDT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services for the use psychotropic medications were provided for one of five final sampled residents (Resident 80) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 80 was informed and the informed consent included the indication and manifested behaviors for the use sertraline (antidepressant medication) and Abilify (antipsychotic medication) as ordered by the physician. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the informed consent had the prescriber's signature. These failures had the potential for the Resident 80 to be unaware of the risks and potential side effects associated with the use psychotropic medications.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Informed Consent revised 5/2019 showed it is the policy of this facility that resident rights are not violated and a copy of these rights and pertinent policies are made available to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure privacy was provided for one nonsampled residents (Resident 4) during the medication administration. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 4's privacy was observed when the licensed nurse administered the resident's medications in the hallway. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the dignity of the resident and violate the resident's rights to privacy. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident's Rights: Dignity and Privacy dated 11/2021 showed it is the policy of this facility that all residents be treated with kindness, dignity and respect. Residents shall be examined and treated in a manner that maintains the privacy of their bodies. A closed door or drawn curtain shields the Resident from passers-by. Medical record review for Resident 4 was initiated on 2/22/26. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment for one of 15 final sampled residents (Resident 86). * Resident 86's nightstand was not in good repair and safe condition. This failure had the potential to negatively impact on Resident 86's' quality of life and safety. Findings: On 2/22/26 at 0830 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident 86's nightstand was observed by the resident's bed. A bedside commode was placed in front of the nightstand. Resident 86's nightstand was observed with the bottom drawer sticking out and unable to fully close. The right side of the nightstand that was positioned close to the resident's bed was observed with the lower part of the wood warped. Medical record review for Resident 86 was initiated on 2/22/26. Resident 86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 86's H&P examination dated 2/22/26, showed the resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions. On 2/22/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive plan of care were revised to reflect the residents' current care needs and interventions for two of 15 final sampled residents (Residents 17 and 75) reviewed for care plans. * Resident 17's care plan addressing the resident's nutrition was not revised to address Resident 17's significant unplanned weight loss on 1/21/26. In addition, the care plan interventions did not reflect Resident 17's current physician's orders. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 75's care plan addressing the resident's activity was revised to reflect the resident's contact isolation precaution. These failures posed the risk of not providing the resident with individualized and person-centered care. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning revised 4/2025 showed the facility IDT will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered and culturally competent care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services status post fall for one of 15 final sampled residents (Resident 82) and dietary services for one non-sampled resident (Resident 40) in accordance to the facility's P&P. * The facility failed to complete the physical assessment, obtain the vital signs and perform the neuro checks post fall incident for Resident 82. In addition, the facility failed to monitor Resident 82's blood pressure and heart rate prior to the administration of sacubitril-valsartan (a medication used to treat chronic heart failure) and complete a fall risk assessment correctly. * The facility failed to provide Magic Cup (a nutritional supplement) to Resident 40 as ordered by the physician. These failures posed a risk for the residents to not receive the appropriate care and could negatively affect the residents' health and well-being and potentially contributed to Resident 82's death. Findings: 1. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate care and services for one of one final sampled residents (Resident 5) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter (flexible tube inserted into the bladder to continuously drain urine into an external collection bag). * The facility failed to monitor Resident 5's urinary output per the resident's plan of care. This failure had the potential for the resident to develop indwelling urinary catheter related complications. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning revised 4/2025 showed the facility IDT will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered and culturally competent care plan for each resident and will include each resident's needs identified in the comprehensive assessment. Medical record review for Resident 5 was initiated on 2/22/26. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 5's H&P examination…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services related to weight loss for one of four residents (Resident 17) reviewed for nutrition. * The facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when Resident 17 had a weight loss. In addition, the facility failed to conduct an IDT meeting and carried out an RD recommendation related to Resident 17's weight loss. These failures had the potential for the resident to not receive the necessary care and nutritional interventions and could contribute to resident's further weight loss.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Food and Nutrition Services - Nutrition Care Management dated 2/9/26 showed the facility shall ensure all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status such as usual body weight (UBW) or desirable body weight (DBW) and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition or resident preference demonstrates that it is not possible. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and services for one of one final sampled resident (Resident 86) and two non-sampled residents (Residents 16 and 51) reviewed for the respiratory care. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 86 had a physician's order for the use of oxygen therapy. Furthermore, when Resident 86 had an order for oxygen, Resident 86 was provided with oxygen greater than what was ordered by the physician. In addition, Resident 86's nebulizer mask and tubing were not labeled and stored properly when not in use. * The facility failed to ensure the nebulizer mask and tubing at Resident 16's bedside was labeled and stored in a bag. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the nebulizer mask and tubing at Resident 16's nightstand belonged to the resident. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 51's nebulizer mask was stored in a set-up bag when not in use. These failures had the potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmaceutical services for one final sampled resident (Resident 7) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 74). * LVN 7 failed to administer Resident 74's probiotic (supplement) as ordered by the physician. * The facility failed to obtain and document Resident 7's blood pressure and heart rate per the physician's ordered parameters for two medications: amlodipine-olmesartan (blood pressure medication) and metoprolol succinate (blood pressure medication). These failures had the potential to negatively affect the residents' well-being.Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration (undated) showed medications will be administered as prescribed by the physician, and only by persons lawfully authorized to do so. Medications are administered in accordance with the written orders of the attending physicians. On 2/24/26 at 0836 hours, a medication administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services to ensure for proper storage, labeling, and disposal of the medications for two final sampled residents (Residents 2 and 33), one nonsampled resident (Resident 19) and one of three medication carts (Medication Cart A) observed. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 2's hydrocodone-acetaminophen (a controlled drug used to manage severe pain) and Resident 19's oxycodone (a controlled drug used to manage severe pain) medication bubble packs were properly stored in Medication Cart A. * The facility failed to ensure the accurate labeling of one insulin pen stored in Medication Cart A. * The facility failed to ensure the calmospetine (a moisture barrier designed to protect and heal skin irritations, diaper rash, incontinence, and minor wounds) cream was not left unattended by the licensed nurse on Resident 33's bedside table. These failures had the potential to negatively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain the infection control practices to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection. The facility failed to ensure Resident 24's wound vacuum machine and the connector tubing were not stored and touching the floor. This failure posed the risk for the resident to develop a wound infection that could negatively affect the resident's health and well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Infection Prevention and Control Program revised 10/2022 showed the infection prevention and control program is a facility-wide effort involving all disciplines and individuals and is an integral part of the quality assurance and performance improvement program. The elements of the infection prevention and control program consist of coordination/ oversight, surveillance, data analysis, antibiotic stewardship, outbreak management, prevention of infection, and employee health and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, immunization document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary services related to COVID-19 vaccination was provided for two of five residents (Residents 5 and 7) reviewed for immunizations. * The facility failed to ensure Residents 5 and 7 were provided the education specific to eligibility to receive COVID-19 vaccine. This failure posed the risk for the residents to acquire COVID-19 infection and could negatively affect the residents' health and well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident Immunizations revised 4/2025 showed it is the policy of the facility to offer and administer COVID-19 immunization to eligible residents after providing education on the risks and potential side effects of the vaccine and obtaining consent. To minimize the risk of residents acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from COVID-19, each resident is informed about the benefits and risks of immunizations; and has the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitation guidelines were followed when: * The facility failed to ensure the food items were properly stored and maintained. * The facility failed to ensure the food items were dated and labeled. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment was maintained in a sanitary condition and/or cleaned properly. These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses for 57 of 59 residents receiving the dietary services in the facility's kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's census on 3/25/25, showed 57 of 59 residents received food from the facility's kitchen. According to the USDA Food Code 2022, Section 4-601.11, Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils: (A) Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. (B) The food-contact surfaces of cooking equipment and pans shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other soil accumulations. (C) Nonfood-contact surfaces…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to two of 15 final sampled residents (Residents 24 and 31). - The physician's order for the resident to be up in the chair during meals was not carried out for Resident 24. - The physician's order was not obtained and the care plan was not developed for the use of the wander guard for Resident 31. These failures had the potential for these residents to not receive the necessary care and services to meet their care needs. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Physician Orders revised on 11/2019 showed the physician's orders shall be obtained prior to the initiation of any medication or treatment. All the orders must be specific and complete with all the necessary details to carry out the prescribed order without any questions. Medical record review for Resident 24 was initiated on 3/25/25. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and the facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate services needed to maintain the acceptable parameters of nutritional status were provided for three of three final sampled resident (Residents 4, 31, and 32) reviewed for weight loss. * The facility failed to ensure the RD's recommendations on 3/14/25, were followed up with the physician and addressed in the Nutrition IDT when Resident 4 had a severe weight loss of 15 lbs in seven days. This failure had the potential for Resident 4 not to receive the necessary intervention to prevent further weight loss. * The facility failed to ensure the RD and IDT analyzed and implemented the necessary interventions to address Resident 32's unplanned severe weight loss of 16 lbs which was equivalent to 8.33% in 21 days. In addition, the physician and resident and/or their representative were not notified of Resident 32's unplanned significant weight loss of 16 lbs, 8.33% between 2/7/25 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the GT placement check was performed prior to starting the resident's enteral feeding for one of one final sample resident reviewed for tube feeding (Resident 32). This failure had the potential for the residents to develop complications related to the GT care and management, including tube dislodgement. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Enteral Feedings-Safety Precautions revised 12/2011 showed the section for Preventing Aspiration showing to check enteral tube placement prior to each feeding and administration of medication. Review of the facility's P&P titled Enteral Tube Feeding via Continuous Pump dated 12/2011 showed the section for Steps in the Procedure showing to verify placement of the tube as follows: - Observe for a change in the external tube length marked at the time of the initial insertion X-ray. - Observe for signs of respiratory distress (if applicable). - Auscultate:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary respiratory care and services were provided for two of two sampled residents (final sample resident, Residents 356 and nonsampled resident, Resident 705) reviewed for respiratory care. * The facility failed to ensure the oxygen was administered as ordered by the physician to Resident 356. * The facility failed to ensure the nasal cannula tubing was dated and a storage bag was provided for Resident 705. These failures had the potential for these residents to not receive the appropriate respiratory care or developed respiratory infection which may negatively affect the residents' medical conditions. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Oxygen Administration revised 10/2010 showed the purpose of the procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Further review of the P&P showed to verify that there is a physician order for the procedure and to review the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. The facility's medication error rate was 7.41%. * LVN 1 did not administer Resident 34's metformin HCL (medication to lower the blood sugar) with meal or food as ordered. * LVN 1 administered Advil (pain reliver) 200 mg two tablets for Resident 44's pain level of 8 which was not a prescribed pain level for this pain medication. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' health outcomes. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications revised 12/2012 showed the medication shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. The medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. 1. On 3/26/25 at 0827 hours, a medication administration observation for Resident 34 was conducted with LVN 1. Resident 34 had no breakfast tray on the overbed table. LVN 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services to ensure the proper storage and disposal of the medications. * The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart A was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. * The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart B was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner and the expired medication in the medication cart was disposed. * The facility failed to dispose of the expired medications in the Medication Storage Room. * The facility failed to store the oral and external medications separately in the Medication Storage Room. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being, for the medications to lose the stability and effectiveness, and medication errors. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Drug Storage and Labeling (undated) showed the drugs and biologicals will be stored in a safe, secure and orderly fashion, and will be accessible only to the licensed nursing or pharmacy personnel.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed as evidenced by: * [NAME] 1 failed to follow the recipe for the egg rolls and cream of rice during the puree preparation. * Residents 7, 706, 707, 756, and 758 (nonsampled residents) were not served a regular textured diet as ordered by the physician. * Resident 706 (nonsampled resident) was not served the appropriate serving portion as ordered by the physician * [NAME] 1 failed to use the correct scoop size to serve rice for Resident 33 (final sample resident). These failures had the potential of not meeting the residents' nutritional needs which could lead to nutritional related health complications. Findings: Review of the facility's census on 3/25/25, showed 57 of 59 residents received food from the kitchen. Review of the facility's P&P titled Menu Planning dated 2023 showed the menus are planned to meet nutritional needs of resident in accordance with established national…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medical records were complete and accurately maintained for two of 15 final sampled residents (Residents 4 and 33). * Resident 4's POLST failed to show documentation as to whether Resident 4 had formulated the advanced directive. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 33's peripheral IV catheter care was documented. These failures had the potential for the residents' care needs not being met as their medical information was inaccurate and incomplete. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Advance Directive revised 11/2019 showed once the advance directive or information regarding resident preferences regarding treatment options is received by the facility, it will be confirmed in the resident medical record and communicated to the members of the care plan team. The facility will also notify the attending physician of the advance directives so that, if necessary, the appropriate orders can be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the hospice and facility staff worked collaboratively together in the plan of care for one of one hospice resident (final sampled resident, Resident 1) as per the hospice contract agreement. This failure had the potential of Residents 1 to not receive hospice care as per the hospice contract agreement and P&P. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Hospice Program revised 12/2011 showed when a resident participates in the hospice program, a coordinated plan of care between the facility, hospice agency and resident/family will be developed and shall include directives for managing pain and other uncomfortable symptoms. The hospice agency retains overall professional management responsibility for directing the implementation of the plan of care related to the terminal illness and related conditions. Review of Hospice A's Services Agreement: Exhibit B (undated) showed for Nursing Services, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the infection control practices were followed as evidenced by: * The OTA failed to perform hand hygiene before and after assisting Resident 4 to the bathroom. * LVN 1 failed to perform hand hygiene before and after taking the resident's blood pressure, during the medication preparation and administration, and in between the medication administration for Residents 3 and 34. * LVN 7 failed to perform hand hygiene after removing her gloves and in between contacts with Resident 24's roommate and Resident 24. These failures posed the risk for the transmission of the communicable diseases to other residents in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene dated 12/2012 showed the facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infection. Employees must wash their hands for at least fifteen (15) seconds using…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen's essential equipment in a clean and safe operating condition when: * The ice machine was not cleaned as per the manufacturer's guidelines for cleaning and sanitizing. * The low temperature dishwasher handles were missing covers and had brown discoloration. * The low temperature dishwasher machine was not operating as per the manufacturer's instructions. * The residents' dining room refrigerator temperature log was not monitored as per the facility's policy. There failures had the potential for the essential equipment to not function in the way it was intended, and exposed the residents to unsafe practices, which could lead to food borne illnesses for the residents. Findings: Review of the facility's census on 3/25/25, showed 57 of 59 residents received food from the kitchen. Review of the facility's P&P titled Sanitation dated 2023 showed the following: Policy: The Food & Nutrition Services Department shall have equipment of the type and in the amount…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to treat one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) with dignity when the staff removed her indwelling urinary Foley catheter. * The facility failed to get permission from Resident 2 for multiple staff to be present during the Foley catheter removal. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 2's well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident Rights revised 10/2009 showed the Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility which includes to choose a physician and treatment, and participate in decisions and care planning. Our facility will make every effort to exercise his/her rights to assure the resident is always treated with respect, kindness, and dignity. Review of the facility's P&P Titled Quality of Life-Dignity revised 10/2009 showed the staff members shall promote, maintain, and protect the residents' privacy, including bodily privacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the pharmaceutical services to ensure the medications were administered as ordered for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2). * The facility failed to ensure the medications scheduled for 0900 hours were administered to Resident 2timely. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the resident's health and well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications revised 12/2012 showed the medications must be administered within one hour of their prescribed time unless otherwise specified (for example before and after meal orders). Medical record review for Resident 2 was initiated on 11/19/24. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 2 had a diagnosis of muscle spasms, hypertension, multiple sclerosis, and osteoarthritis. On 11/19/24 at 1005 hours, an interview was conducted with Resident 2. Resident 2 stated she had not received her knee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure the blenders used for puree preparation were air dried prior to storing. * The facility failed to ensure the cutting boards were kept in a sanitary condition and with cleanable surface. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils had a smooth cleanable surface and were not worn out. * The facility failed to ensure the sanitary condition of the hood over the stove was maintained. * The facility failed to offer and provide hand hygiene to the residents before and after meals. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses for the residents in the facility. Findings: Review of the CMS-672 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents completed by the facility on 10/3/23, showed 54 of 57 residents in the facility received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. According to the USDA Food Code 2022, 4-901.11, Equipment and Utensils, Air-Drying Required, that after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 23 final sampled residents (Resident 443) was assessed to self-administer his medications. This failure had the potential for Resident 443 to administer medications inaccurately. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Self-Administration of Medications revised 12/2012 showed the residents have the right to self-administer medications if the staff and practitioner have determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. Determination of a resident's ability to self-administer medications shall be documented in the resident's medical record. On 10/2/23 at 0924 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 443 and CNA 1. Resident 443 was observed with two medicine cups containing pink cream on the bedside table. Resident 443 stated the cream was for the inflamed skin between his groins. Resident 443 stated the nurse left the cream at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was developed and/or implemented for five of 23 final sampled residents (Residents 21, 29, 37, 344, and 543). * The facility failed to ensure the bilateral floor mats were implemented in accordance with Residents 21 and 37's care plan. * The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address the use of CPAP machine for Resident 29. * The facility failed to ensure to follow a plan of care intervention to monitor and document intake and output for Resident 344's use of suprapubic catheter. * The facility failed to initiate a care plan to address the use of duloxetine HCL (an antidepressant medication) and trazodone (an antidepressant medication and sleep aid) including specific behavioral manifestations to be monitored by staff for Resident 543 These failures placed the residents at risk of not being provided appropriate, consistent, and individualized care. Findings:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure one of 23 final sampled residents (Resident 543) attained and maintained highest practicable physical well being. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 543's blood pressure and pulse rate were assessed and documented as ordered. * The facility failed to address Resident 543's complaints of constipation, notify physician of the change in condition, provide bowel regimen for constipation, and follow the care plan for pain medication and constipation monitoring. These failures had the potential to adversely affect the physical health and create the risk of not providing appropriate and consistent care to the resident. Findings: a. Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications revised 12/2012 showed medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. Medical record review for Resident 543 was initiated on 10/3/23. Resident 543 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure three of 23 final sampled residents (Residents 10, 21, and 37) remained free from accident hazards. *The facility failed to implement bilateral floor mats as per the physician's order and as care planned for Resident 37. *The facility failed to ensure the bilateral floor mats were implemented as per the care plan for Resident 21. *The facility failed to continue to monitor and document assessment every shift for 72 hours post fall incident for Resident 10. These failures had the potential to place the residents at risk for serious injury. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing revised 12/2007, showed staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling, and to try to minimize complications from falling. Medical record review for Resident 37 was initiated on 10/2/23. Resident 37 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care for five of 23 final sampled residents (Residents 10, 24, 29, 344, and 543) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 43). * The facility failed to administer oxygen therapy treatment as ordered by the physician for Resident 344. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 43's nebulizer mask was stored properly. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 29's CPAP mask was stored properly. * Resident 24 received continuous oxygen at 3 L/min via nasal cannula without a physician's order. * The facility to administer oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician for Resident 543. * The facility failed to ensure that nebulizer mask and tubing were changed and labeled as per the facility's policy for Resident 10. These failures had the potential risk for residents' respiratory equipment to become contaminated and negatively affect the residents' medical condition. Findings: Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the availability of the prescribed supplements for one nonsampled resident (Resident A). * Resident A had a physician's order for garlic supplement and glucosamine supplement. The licensed nurse was unable to administer the garlic and glucosamine supplements as ordered due to the unavailability of the supplements. This failure posed the risk for inhibiting the therapeutic effects of the supplements and had the potential to negatively affect the resident's health. Findings: Medical record review for Resident A was initiated on 10/2/23. Resident A was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident A's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 9/26/23, to administer garlic tablet 1 mg orally once a day for supplement. Review of Resident A's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 9/26/23, to administer a glucosamine capsule 500 mg orally twice a day for supplement. On 10/5/23 at 0809 hours, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the Pharmacy Consultant's recommendations from drug regimen review in August 2023 were acted upon for one of 23 final sampled residents (Resident 9). This failure placed the resident at risk for receiving unnecessary medications, increasing their risk for side effects. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Therapy revised date 4/2007 showed the Consultant Pharmacist shall review each resident's medication regimen monthly, as requested by the staff or practitioner, or when a clinically significant adverse consequence is confirmed or suspected. Periodically, and when circumstances are present that represent a greater risk for medication-related complications, the staff and practitioner will review the medication regimen for continued indications, proper dosage and duration, and possible adverse consequences. The Physician will identify situations where medications should be tapered, discontinued, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of 23 final sampled residents (Residents 10 and 543) were free from the unnecessary psychotropic drugs (any drug that affects brain activity). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 543's episodes of behaviors for the use of duloxetine (medication used to treat depression) and Trazadone (medication used to treat depression and aid with sleep) were consistent with the physician's orders. * The facility failed to provide the non-pharmacological interventions to Resident 10's anxiety to minimize the Xanax and lorazepam use; failed to provide the physician's documentation to extend Resident 10's Xanax and lorazepam medications (psychotropic medications) after 14 days of PRN use; and failed to ensure Resident 10's episodes of behavior for the use of Xanax (antianxiety medication) were accurately monitored and documented in the MAR. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. The facility's medication error rate was 7.41%. Two of two licensed nurses (LVNs 2 and 4) were found to have made errors during the medication administration observations. * Resident 10 had a physician's order to apply 2 grams of 1% Voltaren (pain relief gel); however, the LVN failed to utilize the dosing card to determine the dose of Voltaren administered to Resident 10. * Resident A had a physician's order for Pulmicort inhalation (corticosteroid medication) for hypoxia which was scheduled to be administered at 0900 hours; however, the LVN did not administer Resident A's Pulmicort until approximately 5 hours after the mediation was ordered to be administered. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the residents' health. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications revised 12/2012 showed the medications must be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medications were stored and labeled properly two of four medication carts and failed to store resident biologicals and treatment supplies in a safe manner for one of one treatment cart. *The facility failed to ensure two medication carts (Medication Carts A & B) were kept locked when unattended by staff. * The facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended on top of Medication Cart B. * The facility's treatment cart was observed with several unpackaged gauze pads lying on top of a pair of scissors and Calmoseptine ointment stored inside of a plastic cup. These failures posed the risk of unauthorized persons having access to the medications and had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Storage of Medications revised 4/2007 showed the facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified regarding laboratory services were not performed as ordered and abnormal laboratory test results were reported for two of 23 final sampled residents (Residents 344 and 543). * The facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of laboratory test not performed as ordered for Resident 344. * The facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of the abnormal lab results and documented in Resident 543's medical record. These failures had the potential to adversely affect the residents' physical health. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Diagnostic Test Results Notification revised 1/2022 showed it is the policy of the facility to obtain laboratory and radiology services when ordered by a Physician, Physician Assistant, or Nurse Practitioner. Laboratory and radiology services will be arranged as ordered. Results of laboratory, radiological, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 23 final sampled residents (Resident 343) was provided a prescribed therapeutic diet. This failure posed the risk of Resident 343's nutrition needs not being met. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Nutrition Care: Diet Orders for New Admission, Diet Changes, Nothing by Mouth (NPO), or Hold Meals (undated) showed all residents/patients will have a written diet order on admission which has been prescribed by the physician. Verbal telephone orders may be received and recorded by a registered dietitian and will be signed by the prescriber. On 10/2/23 at 1229 hours, during the dining observation, Resident 343 stated she had a thyroid surgery in the past. Resident 343 stated she did not eat most of her protein in her plate because it was harder for her to swallow, or the food got stuck in her throat. Resident 343's meal card ticket showed a regular soft diet and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the rehabilitation services for one of 23 final sampled residents (Resident 345). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 345 was provided RNA services for AROM exercises to bilateral upper and lower extremities as per the physician's orders. This failure had the potential for Resident 345 to decline in the ROM functions and mobility. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Quality of Care: RNA, Restorative Nursing, and Documentation revised 2/2022 showed it is the policy of the facility that Restorative Nursing shall be provided to a resident upon recommendation by the rehabilitation department to meet the resident restorative nursing care need. Physician's orders are to be obtained when a resident is to participate in the facility's restorative nursing program for ambulation or range of motion (ROM). The staff providing the program shall document that the RNA program is provided by documenting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medical records for four of 23 final sampled residents (Residents 10, 31, 344, and 543) were complete and accurate. * The facility failed to ensure the indwelling urinary catheter care was recorded for Resident 344. * Resident 10's physician's order for Pilocarpine 1% ophthalmic solution contained a conflicting administration frequency. * The facility failed to record the edema assessment for Resident 31. * Resident 31's medical record contained a physician's order for another resident (Resident 44). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 543's POLST form was accurate and signed by the physician. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 543's wound treatments were documented in the TAR. These failures had the potential to not providing necessary care and services to these residents as their medical information was inaccurate. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Charting and Documentation revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement the infection control practices designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and prevent the transmission of diseases and infections to all residents; and fail to implement safe and sanitary infection control practices for one of 23 final sampled residents (Resident 393). * The facility failed to ensure the personal items were not on the clean sorting table in the laundry. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 393's urinary drainage bag and urine meter drainage container (used to measure and drain urine when emptying) were not touching the floor. These failures posed the risk for transmission of disease-causing microorganisms. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Laundry revised 2/2022 showed it is the policy of the facility that careful precautionary procedures must be followed by laundry personnel to prevent the spread of infectious disease to other staff members, residents, and visitors. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop and implement the comprehensive person-centered plan of care to reflect the change of condition for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). * There was no care plan developed for Resident 1's preference to not have any male CNAs provide showers or change the resident when soiled. This failure posed the risk of not providing appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to Resident 1.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against revised 12/2023 showed in protection section to review and revise the resident care plan if the resident's medical, nursing, physical, mental, or psychosocial needs or preferences change as a result of an incident. Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 8/29/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed the resident had a BIMS score of 12, indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the personal privacy was provided during care for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 543). This failure had the potential to negatively affect the dignity of the resident and violate the resident's rights to privacy. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident Rights revised 10/2009 showed the employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. The policy also showed the federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's rights to have privacy and confidentiality. On 10/03/23 at 1110 hours, an observation was conducted with Resident 543. The OTA was providing care for Resident 543 with the door and curtains open, and Resident 543 was observed in bed with her stomach exposed. On 10/03/2023 at 1118 hours, an interview was conducted with the OTA. The OTA acknowledged Residents 543's stomach was exposed and stated the curtain or door should have been closed while providing care.
- No harm found · B2023-10-05 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to accurately complete the MDS assessment for one of 23 final sampled residents (Resident 11). * Resident 11 was a smoker. The facility failed to code Resident 11's use of tobacco in the quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. This failure posed the risk of Resident 11 not receiving the individualized plan of care based on the resident's specific needs. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident Assessment Instrument revised 10/2010 showed all persons who have completed any portion of the MDS Resident Assessment Form must sign such document attesting to the accuracy of such information. On 10/2/23 at 1139 hours, an interview was conducted with Resident 11. Resident 11 stated he usually smoked two cigarettes every day. Medical record review for Resident 11 was initiated on 10/2/23. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 11's H&P examination dated 9/4/20,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-10-05 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide and explain a summary of the baseline care plan for one of 23 final sampled residents (Resident 347). This had the potential for inappropriate interventions and care for Resident 347. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan revised 1/2021 showed a baseline care plan shall be developed within 48 hours of admission. The resident, the resident's family and/or responsible party should participate in the development of the care plan. During the initial facility tour on 10/2/23 at 1159 hours, Resident 347 stated no staff had discussed her plan of care since she came to the facility for the past two days. Medical record review for Resident 347 was initiated on 10/2/23. Resident 347 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 347's H&P examination dated 10/1/23, showed Resident 347 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident 347's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-10-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 23 final sampled residents (Resident 24) with an existing pressure ulcer received the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice. * The Treatment Nurse did not date, time, and initial Resident 24's left heel wound treatment dressing when performed wound care. This failure had the potential for Resident 24 to not receive appropriate care and services to prevent the wound to worsen. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Wound Care dated 10/2010 showed to mark tape with initials, time, and date; and apply to dressing. Review of the facility's matrix showed Resident 24 had developed a Stage 4 pressure ulcer on her left heel at the facility. Medical record review for Resident 24 was initiated on 10/2/23. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 24's H&P examination dated 6/30/23, showed Resident 24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate care and services for the G-tube for one of 23 final sampled residents (Resident 37). * The Treatment Nurse failed to follow the facility's P&P to date, time, and initial the G-tube dressing when performing the dressing changes. This failure had the potential for the resident to not receive the appropriate care and services to prevent infection at the G-tube site. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Wound Care revised 10/2010 showed after dressing the wound, staff should mark the tape with initials, time, and date and apply to the dressing. Medical record review for Resident 37 was initiated on 10/2/23. Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 37's Order Summary Report dated 10/3/23, showed Resident 37 had a G-tube. The Order Summary Report also showed the following physician's orders: - dated 8/25/23, wound consult with the physician for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) with a history of falls remained free from accidents. * The facility failed to ensure the care plan problem was revised to address Resident 1's fall incident on 8/28/23. Resident 1 had another fall on 8/30/23. This failure put Resident 1 at risk for further falls and serious injuries. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans - Comprehensive revised October 2010 showed assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition change. Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 9/1/23. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on 8/30/23, to the acute care hospital due to a fall incident. Review of Resident 1's Fall Risk Evaluation dated 8/14/23, showed Resident 1 was a medium risk for falls. The Fall Risk Evaluation dated 8/16/23, showed Resident 1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BASHANDY, HANY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/27/2025 |
| BRAITHWAITE, SETH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2023 |
| WILLITS, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/01/2023 |
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 11/08/2022 |
| KEETCH, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2011 |
| LOOPER, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 02/01/2023 |
| SATO, AMI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/09/2024 |
| MEDELY INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/01/2023 |
| PORT, BARRY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/27/2025 |
| ENSIGN SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/31/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $945K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555027. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.