No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Palm Terrace Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center

24962 Calle Aragon, Laguna Hills, CA 92637 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (949) 587-9000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (949) 587-9000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Feb 20262 actual-harm citations$50,950 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $50,950 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-09)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
24902 Moulton Pkwy · (949) 462-0560 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
24953 Paseo De Valencia Ste 17b · (949) 581-9840 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
25381 Alicia Pkwy · (949) 215-9708 · Call to confirm hours
Park
189 Avenida Majorca · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
23822 Avenida Sevilla · (949) 624-3849

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.0%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.6%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.4%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.7%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.3%13.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.9%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.9%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.7%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.8%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.0%11.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.622.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.841.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 373 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.94U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.45hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.40hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 86 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.94 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.5%CMS range 54.0–64.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.4%CMS range 9.4–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge62.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified89.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.8%CMS range 6.6–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.251.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
1.52
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.37
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.34
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
52.5%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 92.2 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.34 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.60 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

22
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-09)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-03)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-02-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, facility P&P review, and hospital Encounter Summary review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services and interventions to maintain the highest practicable well-being for one of three sampled residents (Resident 103) reviewed for closed record; and for one of 22 final sampled residents (Resident 10) reviewed for meal observation. * Resident 103 was in his room when LVN (Licensed Vocational Nurse) 8 noted the resident with oral secretions. LVN 8 performed oral suction and then obtained Resident 103's vital signs which included the blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation (measures the percentage of oxygen-carrying hemoglobin in the blood), and temperature. The facility failed to place Resident 103 on a non-rebreather mask (a high-concentration oxygen therapy device used in emergencies to deliver 60%-95% oxygen via a reservoir bag, typically set at 10-15 L/min (liters per minute) when the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure five out of five licensed nurses reviewed for competency had specific competencies and standard of practice skill sets needed to provide safe and efficient nursing care. * The facility failed to ensure LVN 8 had the appropriate competency and skill set to assess and provide interventions when Resident 103 was in critical condition experiencing desaturation (a drop in oxygen levels in the blood), hypothermia (a dangerous, potentially fatal medical emergency where the body loses heat faster than it produces it, causing the core temperature to drop below 95 degrees Fahrenheit), and hypertension (high blood pressure). LVN 8 was unclear of the LVN's scope of practice regarding respiratory care when caring for a resident and failed to call 911 during an emergency. * The facility failed to ensure RN 1 and LVN 2 were able to demonstrate competency in the calibration of a glucometer (accucheck machine (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure six of 22 final sampled residents (Residents 2, 3, 5, 14, 27, and 106) were free from the unnecessary psychotropic medications. * The facility failed to ensure the alprazolam (antianxiety medication) was administered to Resident 2 as per the physician's order. The facility failed to ensure the behavior manifestation was monitored and documented, and the non-pharmacological interventions were provided prior to the administration of the alprazolam medication. * The facility failed to ensure the monitoring of Resident 3's meal intake was accurate to identify when the resident had a meal intake of less than 50% related to the use of mirtazapine (antidepressant medication). * The facility failed to accurately monitor Resident 14's orthostatic blood pressure related to the use of Seroquel (antipsychotic medication). * The facility failed to accurately monitor Resident 106's orthostatic blood pressure related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils had a smooth cleanable surface and were in good condition. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchenware, kitchen utensils, and one heavy-duty blender used for puree preparation were clean and free of food particles or residue. * The facility failed to ensure the cutting boards were kept in a sanitary condition and with cleanable surface. * The facility failed to ensure the hot food and cold beverage were maintained within the acceptable temperature range during tray line. These failures had the potential for cross contamination and foodborne illnesses for the residents consuming the food prepared in the facility's kitchen.Findings: Review of the facility's Diet Type Report dated 1/29/26, showed 95 of 99 residents consumed the food prepared in the kitchen. 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Sanitation dated 2023 showed all utensils, counters, shelves, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the informed consent was obtained for the use of psychotropic medications for three of five final sampled residents (Residents 4, 5, and 27) reviewed for unnecessary medications. * The facility failed to ensure the informed consent for Seroquel (antipsychotic medication) contained the frequency and route for Resident 4. * The facility failed to ensure the informed consent for alprazolam (antianxiety medication) contained the correct dosage, frequency, and duration for Resident 27. * The facility failed to ensure the informed consent for Xanax (antianxiety medication) was renewed after six months for Resident 5. These failures had the potential for the resident to be unaware of the risks associated with the use of psychotropic medications which could negatively affect the resident's well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Chemical Restraints and Psychotropic Medication Management revised 4/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for one of 22 final sampled residents (Resident 35). * The facility failed to ensure the sound coming from the room air conditioning unit was at an acceptable level for Resident 35. This failure posed the risk for Resident 35 to not have a comfortable place to rest and sleep.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident Rights: Accommodation of Needs and Preferences and Homelike Environment Policy (undated) showed the resident's environment will be maintained in a homelike manner to ensure appropriate housekeeping, clean linens in good repair, private closet space for each resident, adequate and comfortable lighting, comfortable and safe temperatures, and comfortable sound levels. On 1/29/26 at 0910 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 35 in the resident's room. Resident 35 was observed awake and sitting on the bed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the level 1 PASRR Screening was conducted after a hospital exemption lapsed for one of one resident (Resident 12) reviewed for PASRR. * The facility failed to resubmit a new Level 1 PASRR Screening when Resident 12 had remained in the facility longer than 30 days as recommended in Level 1 PASRR Screening dated 4/30/25. This failure posed the risk for Resident 12 to not receive the necessary mental health evaluation and had the potential for the facility to not incorporate the recommendations from the determination and evaluation report into Resident 12's assessment, care planning, and transition of care.Findings: Medical record review for Resident 12 was initiated on 1/28/26. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 12's MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident 12 had a diagnosis of psychotic disorder. On 2/2/26 at 1144 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop and implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan for two of 22 final sampled residents (Resident 24 and 53). * The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for the use of a wander guard for Residents 24. * The facility failed to implement the bilateral floor mats in accordance with Resident 53's risk for falls care plan. These failures posed the risk of not providing the appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to the residents.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning revised 4/2025 showed it is the policy of this facility that the interdisciplinary team (IDT) shall develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive plan of care was revised to reflect the resident's current care needs and interventions for three of 22 final sampled residents (Residents 4, 19 and 27). * The facility failed to ensure the care plan for pain and use of pain medication was revised to address the use of non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of pain medications for Residents 4, 19, and 27. This failure posed the risk of not providing the residents with individualized and person-centered care.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Pain Recognition and Management revised 4/2025 showed the facility must ensure the pain management is provided to the residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, comprehensive and routine assessments, person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. The care plan will include preventative or care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident 53) reviewed for accident hazards remained free from accident hazards. * The facility failed to ensure the bilateral floor mats were provided in accordance with Resident 53's risk for fall plan of care.Findings: Medical record review for Resident 53 was initiated on 1/28/26. Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 53's Fall Risk Evaluation dated 1/27/26, showed Resident 53 's fall risks included intermittent confusion, bedbound status, and incontinence. Review of Resident 53's Care Plan Report showed a care plan initiated on 8/21/25, indicated Resident 53 would be free of falls through the care plan review date on 2/14/26. The interventions initiated on 8/21/25, included a bed and chair alarm to always be in place, to alert staff of Resident 53 attempting unassisted transfers. Further review of the care plan showed an intervention…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain the intravenous access for one of two final sampled residents (Resident 105) reviewed for intravenous care. * The facility failed to ensure the PICC line external catheter and arm circumference measurements were completed and documented in Resident 105's medical record upon admission to the facility. This failure had the potential to delay the identification of catheter related complications for the resident.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Central Venous Access Guidelines and Procedures (undated) showed the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for observation and assessment of residents following insertion of a central vascular access device (thin, flexible tube inserted into a large vein with the tip extending to a major vein near the heart) in order to provide prompt interventions for complications that may develop. Internal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pain management care and services for three of final sampled residents (Residents 4, 19, and 27) reviewed for pain management. * The facility failed to ensure the non-pharmacological interventions were provided to Residents 4, 19, and 27 prior to administering the pain medications. These failures posed the risk for the residents to not receive the appropriate and necessary interventions to manage the residents' pain.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Pain Recognition and Management revised 4/2025 showed to the extent possible, the staff will manage or prevent pain, consistent with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care, current professional standards of practice, and the resident's goals and preferences. The care plan will include preventative or care interventions (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) to manage and/or prevent pain and consider the resident's needs,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmaceutical services to ensure accurate administration and reconciliation of medications. * The facility failed to ensure LVN 5 flushed Resident 10's GT with 50 ml of water before and after medication administration as per the physician's order. In addition, the facility failed to ensure LVN 5 flushed Resident 10's GT in between medications. * The facility failed to ensure the oxycodone (opioid pain medication to treat moderate to severe pain) removed from the bubble pack was recorded and accounted for in the Narcotic and Hypnotic Record for Resident 109. * The facility failed to ensure the correct medication was administered to Resident 52. * The facility failed to ensure the voltaren topical gel (topical medication use to relieve pain) was available for Resident 12. * The facility failed to ensure the lidoderm patch (topical hydrogel patch use to relieve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 22 final sampled residents (Residents 4 and 27) were free from the unnecessary medications. * The facility failed to ensure Residents 4 and 27 were monitored for the signs and symptoms of bleeding related to the use of apixaban medication (anticoagulant medication, use to treat or prevent blood clots). These failures had the potential for the residents to receive unnecessary medications and delay in detecting significant side effects.Findings: According to DailyMed Drug Label Information for apixaban updated 6/15/21, the section for Warnings and Precautions included Bleeding. The apixaban tablets increases the risk of bleeding and can cause serious, potentially fatal, bleeding. 1. Medical record review for Resident 4 was initiated on 1/29/26. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 4's MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident 4 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. The facility's medication error rate was 20% * The facility failed to ensure LVN 5 administered the correct dosage of the apixaban (anticoagulant), docusate sodium (stool softener) and sennoside (laxative) medications via GT to Resident 10. The medication cups were observed with significant residue after the medications were administered. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 12 received the voltaren topical gel (topical medication use to relieve pain). * The facility failed to ensure LVN 9 administered the correct dosage of the diclofenac sodium topical medication (medication used to relieve joint pain) for Resident 45. These failures posed the risk for the residents to have potential side effects or complications related to the medications.1. On 1/29/26 at 1610 hours, a medication administration observation for Resident 10 was conducted with LVN 5. LVN 5 prepared the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, medical record review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications in one of four medications cart inspected (Medication Cart A). * The facility failed to ensure the ondansetron (antiemetic medication) for Resident 63 who was discharged from the facility was removed from Medication Cart A. This failure had the potential for the medication to be accidentally administered and/or diverted. * The facility failed to ensure the amiodarone (antiarrhythmic medication) and ondansetron medications in the bubble packs for Resident 96 were secured/sealed and free from tears or damage. This failure posed the risk of affecting the potency of the medications, and potential for medications to be diverted. * The facility failed to ensure an opened glargine (long-acting insulin) pen for Resident 108 was dated. This failure posed the risk of affecting the potency of the insulin medication.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Storage and Labeling (undated) showed discontinued drug containers shall be marked or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed for two of 22 final sampled residents (Residents 14 and 85) * The lunch meal ticket for Resident 14 was not followed when he was served with only one carton of milk. * The facility failed to follow the weekly food menu on 1/29/26 at noon and ensure food preferences and flavor of a boost glucose control were provided to Resident 85. These failures had the potential for the residents not to receive adequate nutrition. Findings: 1. On 1/29/26 at 1013 hours, an interview was conducted with Resident 14. Resident 14 stated he had a concern about not getting the correct amount of milk every meal. Resident 14 stated he was supposed to get two eight ounces of milk every meal, but he was seldom getting the milk that he should. Resident 14 stated he was frustrated, and he had been in the facility for a long time, and they still cannot work it out. On 1/29/26 at 1234 hours, Resident 14…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure food prepared for the residents was cooked to preserve nutritive value. * The vegetables were cooked more than one hour prior to meal service and held in the steam table with a temperature set on high. This failure had the potential to affect the nutritive content of the food and the amount of food residents consume, potentially resulting in a decrease in residents' food intake leading to poor nutrition and health outcomes.Findings: Review of the professional reference titled https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/cooking-nutrient-content dated 11/7/19, showed in part, the following nutrients are often reduced during cooking: water-soluble vitamins: vitamin C and the B vitamins - thiamine (B1), riboflavin (B2), niacin (B3), pantothenic acid (B5), pyridoxine (B6), folic acid (B9), and cobalamin (B12), fat-soluble vitamins: vitamins A, D, E, and K, and minerals: primarily potassium, magnesium, sodium, and calcium. [NAME] peas contained vitamin C, which is water-soluble and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of one final sampled resident (Resident 13) reviewed for hospice services. * The facility failed to ensure the hospice skilled nurse visit notes were available and included in Resident 13's medical records. This failure posed the risk of delay in communication between the hospice provider and facility which may affect resident care.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled End of Life Care; Hospice revised date 11/2007 showed it is the policy of the facility to provide end of life care for dying residents that emphasizes prevention and relief of symptoms as well as compassionate attention to the resident's dignity and preferences. Through continuing interdisciplinary assessment, individualized plans will be developed and implemented to address the residents' physical, intellectual, emotional, social, spiritual, and practical needs. Hospice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement the infection control practices designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections. * The facility failed to ensure LVN 5 wore a gown when administering medications via GT for Resident 10 who was on EBP. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 24's call light was disinfected prior to use, when it was on the floor. These failures had the potential for cross-contamination and spread of infectious organisms in the facility.Findings: 1. Review of the CMS QSO-24-08-NH dated 3/20/24, for Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of MDROs, showed MDRO transmission is common in long-term care facilities such as nursing homes, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. Many residents in nursing homes are at increased risk of becoming colonized and developing infections with MDROs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure one of one glucometer was maintained in a safe operating condition. * The facility failed to ensure the glucometer calibration was performed correctly. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the glucose strip bottle had an open date and the lot number of the glucose strips was documented in the quality control record. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure the glucose strips and control solutions had an expiration date of 90 days after opening, as per the manufacturer's information. This failure had the potential for residents requiring glucose checks to have inaccurate readings.Findings: Review of the blood glucose meter manufacturer's information sheet titled Quality Assurance/ Quality Control Reference Manual revised 12/2017 showed the following:- under the Performing a Control Solution Test section, the first two of six steps were: Step 1: Insert test strip into the blood glucose meter, and Step 2: Press the Back or Forward button one time to enter the control solution mode. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmaceutical services to two of three sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1's medication was administered timely as ordered by the physician. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 2's medication was administered as ordered by the physician and accurately documented in the MAR. These failures had the potential for the residents to not receive the medications and posed the risk to negatively affect the residents' well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration dated 1/2019 showed the following:- Medications are administered in accordance with the written orders of the attending physician;- Medications are to be administered at the time they are prepared;- Medications are administered within 60 minutes of schedule time; and- The individual who administers the medication dose records…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of two final sampled residents (Resident 38 and 587) observed for medication administration were free from the medication errors. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 38's IV medication was dated and documented time of administration. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 587's PIV was dated and labeled. These failures posed the risk for the residents to develop complications related to the IV therapy. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Nursing Clinical undated showed to label the IV container with the resident's name, medication, dose initials of nurse, time, date, document additives on resident record and dispose of needles and syringes properly. 1. During the initial tour of the facility on 1/29/25 at 1029 hours, Resident 38 was observed in bed awake, receiving an IV antibiotic medication Vancomycin one gram. However, Resident 38's IV medication bag label was undated, no time it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Medical record review for Resident 28 was initiated on 1/29/24. Resident 28 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 28's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 3/26/24, for continuous oxygen at a rate 2 lpm via nasal cannula. On 1/29/25 at 0851 hours, Resident 28 was observed lying in bed with the supplemental oxygen being administered at a rate of 2 lpm via nasal cannula. On 1/29/25 at 1020 hours, an interview was conducted with LVN 1. LVN 1 stated the oxygen tubing should be changed weekly and as needed. LVN 1 stated the date when it was changed should be written on the tubing. On 1/29/25 at 1219 hours, an interview was conducted with the Central Supply. The Central Supply stated the oxygen tubing was changed every Friday. The Central Supply stated Resident 28's nasal cannula tubing was dated 1/13/25, when she changed out the tubing that morning. 3. Medical record review for Resident 438 was initiated on 1/29/24. Resident 438 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents (nonsampled resident, Resident 736) observed for medication administration was free from the significant medication errors. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's health outcomes. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration revised 8/2021 showed it is the policy of this facility that medications shall be administered as prescribed by the attending physician. Medications must be administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician. On 1/31/25 at 0845 hours 0836 hours, a medication administration observation for Resident 736 was conducted with LVN 3. LVN 3 prepared the following medications for Resident 736: - hydralazine (medication to treat high blood pressure) 25 mg one tablet. The medication bubble pack showed the directions to hold the medication if the SBP less than 110 mmHg or pulse rate less than 60…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure eight of eight residents who received pureed food from the kitchen received the proper diets when the facility's puree recipes and menu were not followed as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure the puree recipe for potatoes and menu for pureed wheat rolls were followed. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's census on 1/29/25, showed 95 of 98 residents received food from the kitchen. The facility's document titled Diet Type Report dated January 2025 showed the kitchen provided puree diets to eight residents in the facility. Review of the facility's P&P titled Regular Pureed Diet/IDDSI Level #4 dated 2024 showed the pureed diet is a regular diet that has been designed for residents who have difficulty chewing and/or swallowing. The texture of the prepared food items included on this diet should be smooth and free of lumps, hold their shape, while not being too firm or sticky, and should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the food preparation utensils and equipment were in good, sanitary, and cleanable working conditions. * The facility failed to ensure the food items were dated and labeled. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff wore hair restraint. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses to the medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's census on 1/29/25, showed 95 of 98 residents received food from the kitchen. 1. According to the USDA Food Code 2022, Section 4-601.11, Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils: (A) Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. (B) The food-contact surfaces of cooking equipment and pans shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other soil accumulations. (C) Nonfood-contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review the facility failed to ensure one of nine sampled residents (Resident 2) was free from the significant medication errors. * The facility failed to ensure the licensed nurse properly checked and identified the resident prior to administering the medication. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 2's health outcomes. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration dated 1/2019 showed the residents are identified before the medication is administered using at least two identifiers. Methods of identification may include checking identification band, checking photograph attached to medical record and if necessary, verify resident identification with other care center personnel. Review of Resident 2's medical record was initiated on 9/30/24. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 2's H&P examination dated 9/7/24, showed Resident 2 had capacity to make decisions. Review of Resident 2's MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary pharmacy services were provided to two of two sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) when the medications were not provided within their prescribed time. This failure had the potential for negative health outcomes for Residents 1 and 2. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration - General Guidelines dated 1/2019 showed medications are administered within 60 minutes of scheduled time, except before or after meal orders, which are administered based on mealtimes. Unless otherwise specified by the prescriber, routine medications are administered according to the established medication administration schedule for the care center. Review of the facility's document titled Medication Administration Times, (undated), showed the medications are scheduled to be administered as follows: - daily, administer at 0800 hours; - twice a day, administer at 0800 and 1600 hours; - three times a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's meals were served at the desired temperatures. This failure had the potential for the undesirable food temperatures to result in decreased oral meal intake and undesirable weight loss for the residents. Findings: a. Medical record review for Resident 3 was initiated on 9/3/24. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 3's H&P examination dated 8/30/24, showed Resident 3 had the capacity to make decisions. On 8/29/24 at 1505 hours, an interview was conducted with Resident 3. Resident 3 stated the hot food items on the meal tray were not hot enough. Resident 3 stated he would like to at least eat the warm food. b. Medical record review for Resident 4 was initiated on 9/3/24. Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 4's MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident 4 was able to make to make self-understood and understand others. Resident 4's BIMS summary score showed 15 (cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the responsible party and physician for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 5) were notified when Resident 5 refused to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. This failure resulted in Resident 5's physician and responsible party not being aware of change in the care of Resident 5, which had the potential to negatively affect the resident's well-being. Findings. Medical record review for Resident 5 was initiated on 11/27/23. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 5's History and Physical examination dated 10/15/23, showed Resident 5 did not have the capacity to understand and make medical decisions. Review of Residents 5's MDS dated [DATE], showed mild cognitive impairment. Review of Resident 5's vaccination record showed on 9/19/22, a family member (Family Member 1) gave verbal consent for Resident 5 to receive the vaccination. Review of Resident 5's Medication Administration Record for October 2022 showed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of 26 sampled residents (Residents 2 and 4) were monitored every shift for at least 72 hours following the fall incidents. This failure had the potential to not provide the necessary care and services timely for the residents. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Change of Condition Reporting revised 2/2023 showed the licensed nurse responsible for the resident will continue assessment and documentation every shift for at least seventy-two (72) hours or until condition has stable. Review of the facility's P&P titled Fall Management System (undated) showed when a resident sustains a fall, a physical assessment will be completed by a licensed nurse with the results documented in the medical record. Follow-up documentation will be completed for a minimum of 72 hours following the incident. 1. Medical record review for Resident 2 was initiated on 11/20/23. Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, facility P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen as evidenced by: * Fruit flies were observed in the kitchen . * Multiple areas in the kitchen, kitchen equipment, and food storage areas were not cleaned. * The sanitizer red bucket was stored above the clean sheet pans. * Three opened food items (corn kernel, diced carrot, and hot dog) were found in the reach-in freezer. * The dietary staff stored the personal items (drinks) in the kitchen. * Several resident beverages brought in by families were not labeled. These failures had the potential to cause food borne illnesses for the medically vulnerable residents who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the CMS 672 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents completed by the facility dated 5/17/22, showed 90 of 91 residents in the facility received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. Review of the Food and Drug Administration Federal Food Code 2017 showed, Insects and other pests…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-05-24 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain an environment free of pests. * Fruit flies were observed on multiple days in the food storage and food production areas. This failure had the potential to cause cross contamination of food and food production surfaces as well as the spread of infections in the facility. Findings: Review of the CMS 672 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents completed by the facility dated 5/17/22, showed 90 of 91 residents in the facility received food prepared in the kitchen. Review of the Food and Drug Administration Federal Food Code 2017 showed Insects and other pests are capable of transmitting disease to humans by contaminating food and food-contact surfaces. Effective measures must be taken to eliminate their presence in food establishments. Review of the facility's P&P titled Pest Control dated 7/27/21, showed an expectation the facility maintain an ongoing pest control program to provide an environment free of pests and pest control and that problems will be reported promptly. During the initial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to obtain and maintain a copy of advance directives in the medical records for two of 19 final sampled residents (Residents 21 and 66) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 30). This failure had the potential for the residents' decisions regarding health care and treatment options not being honored. Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 21 was initiated on 5/17/22. Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 21's POLST dated 3/11/22, showed the section for advance directive was not completed. Review of the History and Physical examination dated 3/12/22, showed Resident 21 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident 21's IDT Care Plan Review dated 3/20/22, showed Resident 21 confirmed his advance directive had been formulated. However, Resident 21's medical record failed to show a copy of Resident 21's advance directive. On 5/17/22 at 1305…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-24 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to meet the needs and interests of two of 19 final sampled residents (Residents 2 and 77). * The facility failed to provide Resident 77 with an individualized activity program which met her identified preference of listening to music. * The facility failed to provide Resident 2 with an individualized activity program which met her identified preference of watching television. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being. Findings: 1. On 5/17/22 at 0840 hours, Resident 77 was observed in the hallway self-propelling her wheelchair. On 5/17/22 at 1020 hours, Resident 77 was observed sitting in her wheelchair inside her room. The television was observed to be turned off. There was no in-room sensory stimulation observed. On 5/17/22 at 1121 hours, Resident 77 was observed in the hallway self-propelling her wheelchair. On 5/17/22 at 1242 hours, an observation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for four of 19 final sampled residents (Residents 10, 21, 66, and 77). * The facility failed to ensure a comprehensive and effective systematic approach was implemented to monitor and maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for Resident 10 as evidenced by: - The facility failed to ensure Resident 10 with several unplanned weight loss was monitored effectively as per the facility's P&P and standard of care. - The facility failed to ensure Resident 10's weight goal range was established with the involvement of the resident and/or resident's legal representative, and in accordance with standards of practice. - The facility failed to monitor the effectiveness of Resident 10's nutrition interventions as per the facility's P&P and standard of care. As a result, the facility's system was not effective at ensuring the RD had evaluated unplanned severe weight loss.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to provided the necessary care and services for one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 77) who was on dialysis. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 77's medication was administered as ordered by the physician on the days she was out for dialysis. This failure posed the risk to negatively impact the resident's medical condition. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 77 was initiated on 5/17/22. Resident 77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including end stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis. Review of the Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 3/11/22, for Resident 77 to receive dialysis every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at a dialysis center. Resident 77's transportation pick up time was scheduled at 1130 hours. Another physician's order dated 12/11/21, showed an order for isosorbide mononitrate extended release (blood pressure medication) 60 mg one-half tablet by mouth every 12 hours.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the competency of the licensed nurses in the calibration of medical equipment. * RN 1, and LVNs 1 and 2 were unable to demonstrate competency in the calibration of glucometer (a device to measure BS levels). This failure had the potential to put residents at risk for care not provided in a safe and competent manner. Findings: 1. On 5/19/22 at 1104 hours, a medication cart observation and interview was conducted with LVN 1. LVN 1 was asked to demonstrate the calibration of a glucometer. LVN 1 stated the glucometers were calibrated on the night shift and she had not calibrated a glucometer in a while. When prompted to calibrate the glucometer, LVN 1 stated she did not know how to calibrate the glucometer. On 5/19/22 at 1428 hours, a concurrent interview was conducted with the DON. The DON was informed of the observation. The DON stated the staff were trained on the glucometer calibration upon hire and every year. The DON stated the night shift nurses were assigned to do routine glucometer calibration; however, all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure safe storage of medications. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 77's medications were not left unattended in the resident's room. This failure had the potential to result in unsafe administration of medications. * Expired medications were observed in one of seven medication carts (Treatment Cart 2). This failure had the potential for the residents to be administered the expired medications. Findings: 1. On 5/17/22 at 1249 hours, a medication cup containing several pills and a clear plastic cup containing white powdered medication were observed on top of the overbed table in Resident 77's room. Resident 77 was observed sitting in her wheelchair next to the overbed table. Resident 77's family member was in the room. Resident 77's roommate was observed self propelling her wheelchair inside the room. There was no licensed staff inside the room. A concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 77's family member. Resident 77's family member stated the medications were left by the licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for two nonsampled residents (Residents 24 and 41). * The facility failed to provide diet gelatin for Residents 41 and 24, both of whom had the physician's orders for CCHO (controlled carbohydrate/diabetic) diets. This failure had the potential for the 22 residents receiving a CCHO diets at risk for nutritionally related health complications. Findings: Review of the CMS 672 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, a document completed by the facility dated 5/17/22, showed 22 of 91 residents in the facility had the physicians' orders for a CCHO diet. Review of the facility's P&P titled Menus Planning dated 7/27/21, showed the food served should adhere to the written menu. Review of the planned lunch menu dated 5/18/22, showed for CCHO diet, dessert: diet version. Review of the facility's P&P titled Tray Card System dated 7/27/21, showed each meal tray at breakfast, lunch, and dinner will have a tray card which designates the resident's name and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to follow to provide the appetizing food at appropriate temperatures for three of 19 final sampled residents (Residents 8, 31, and 51) and one nonsampled residents (Resident 23). This failure placed the residents at potential risk for decrease nutritional intake which may affect the resident's overall nutrition status. Finding: Review of the facility's P&P titled Meal Service dated 7/27/21, showed in part, . 7. Temperature of the food when the resident receive it is based on palatability. The goal is to serve cold food cold and hot food hot . Recommended Temperature at Delivery to resident .Hot entrée equal or greater 120 degrees Fahrenheit, Starch equal or greater 120 degrees Fahrenheit, Vegetable equal or greater 120 degrees Fahrenheit . On 5/17/22 at 0919 hours, an interview was conducted with Resident 8. Resident 8 claimed his food was always cold. On 5/17/22 at 1007 hours, an interview was conducted with Resident 31. Resident 31 stated food had a bad texture. On 5/18/22 at 1030 hours, during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medical records were accurate for two of 19 final sampled residents (Residents 10 and 77). * Resident 10 was not provided one on one assistance during meals as ordered by the physician. However, the Medication Administration Record for May 2022 showed one to one feeding assistance was provided. * The facility failed to accurately document Resident 77's fluid intake. These failures posed the risk of the residents not receiving appropriate intervention as the medical record information was not accurate. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Charting and Documentation revised 5/2007 showed the resident's clinical record is the concise account of treatment, care, response to care, signs, symptoms, and progress of the resident condition. 1. On 5/17/2022 at 1321 hours, and on 5/18/2022 at 0830 hours during a dining observation, CNA 3 was observed passing a tray to Resident 10. CNA 3 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was accurate for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 1). * Resident 1's progress notes were not accurate. This failure had the potential for the resident's care needs to not be met as their medical information was inaccurate. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Nursing Clinical Documentation (undated) showed the resident's clinical record is a concise and accurate account of treatment, care, response to care, signs, symptoms and progress of the resident's condition. Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 2/23/26. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 2/8/26. Review of Resident 1's H&P examination dated 1/9/26, showed Resident 1 had no capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident 1's Progress Notes showed the following:- dated 2/8/26 at 2149 hours. Resident 1 was very agitated, began yelling and cussing at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-02-09 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the garbage was properly stored in two of seven garbage dumpsters. * Two of seven garbage dumpsters were observed with the lids partially propped open by cardboard boxes, preventing the lids from fully closing. This failure had the potential to attract pest/rodents that carried diseases.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Garbage and Trash revised date 5/2023 showed all food waste must be placed in sealed leak-proof, non-absorbent, tightly closed containers (i.e., plastic bags) and shall be disposed of as necessary to prevent a nuisance or unsightliness. Adequate, clean, vermin-proof areas must be provided for storage of garbage and rubbish. Garbage and trash cans must be inspected daily that no debris is on the ground or surrounding area, and that the lids are closed. The trash collection area is a potential feeding ground for vermin and rodents and must be kept clean. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code, the outside garbage receptacles must be constructed with tight-fitting lids or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-02-03 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plans were developed to reflect the specific care needs for two of 20 final sampled residents (Residents 686 and 438). * The facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed to address the administration of oxygen for Residents 686 and 438. This failure had the potential for the residents' care needs not being met. Findings: 1. Medical Record review for Resident 686 was initiated on 1/29/25. Resident 686 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 686's H&P examination dated 1/27/25, showed Resident 686 was status post diagnosis of acute respiratory failure secondary to congestive heart failure. Review of Resident 686's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 1/25/25, showed to administer the oxygen at a rate of 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula. On 1/30/25 at 0903 hours, an observation, interview, and concurrent medical record review was conducted with LVN 6. Resident 686…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the proper accounting and safeguarding of the controlled medications to prevent loss, diversion, or accidental exposure. * The facility failed to ensure the Narcotic Count Sheet log was signed by the incoming and outgoing licensed nurses assigned to Medication Cart B. This failure posed the risk for loss or diversion of the controlled medications in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Pharmacy Services Controlled Medications revised 12/2019 under the section for Policy showed it is the policy of the facility to provide separate locked, permanently affixed compartments for storage of controlled drugs listed in Schedule II of the comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1976 and other drugs subject to abuse, except when the facility uses single unit package drug distribution systems in which the quantity stored is minimal and a missing dose can be readily detected. The Procedures section showed at each shift change, a physical inventory of all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services to ensure proper medication storage. * The facility failed to ensure the open packages of wound care supplies were removed from the medication cart. * The facility failed to ensure the orally used medications were stored separately from the externally used medications. These failures had the potential for medication errors and negatively impact the residents' well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Access and Storage revised 2/2019 showed the following: - The provider pharmacy dispenses medications in containers that meet legal requirements, including requirements of good manufacturing practices where applicable. - Medication are kept and stored in these containers. - Transfer of medications from one container to another is done only by a pharmacist. 1. On 1/30/25 at 1215 hours, an inspection for Medication Cart A was conducted with LVN 2. During the inspection of Medication Cart A, the following was observed: - two open individual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and the facility's P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medical records were accurate for one of three residents (Resident 85) reviewed for closed medical records and one of two residents (final sampled resident, Resident 44) investigated for dialysis. * Resident 85's medical record had documentation for the vital signs results and urinary output after his discharge from the facility. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 44's blood pressure access site was accurately documented in the resident's medical record. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 44's blood pressure access site was accurately documented in the resident's medical record. * These failures had the potential for the residents' care needs not being met as their medical information was inaccurate. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Charting and Documentation revised February 2022 showed it is the policy of the facility to ensure the resident record is concise and reflective of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical records were accurately documented for two of two sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2). * When Resident 1 experienced a fall in the facility, LVN 2 inaccurately documented in the medical record that Resident 1 had no falls, thus placing her as a low risk for falls. * Resident 2's plan of care erroneously showed she experienced an actual fall in the facility. These failures had the potential the residents to not receive appropriate interventions to prevent falls. Findings: 1. On 9/8/23 at 1224 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review was conducted with LVN 4. LVN 4 was asked about Resident 1. LVN 4 stated Resident 1 was in her normal assignment for the 0700 to 1500 hours shift. LVN 4 reviewed the medical record and stated Resident 1 experienced a fall on 8/26/23. LVN 4 reviewed the Fall Risk Evaluation dated 8/26/23, and stated it showed Resident 1 was at a low risk for falls. Under Section B: history of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$50,950 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $25,475 — penalty dated 2026-02-09
  • $25,475 — penalty dated 2026-02-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
THE ENSIGN GROUP INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/30/2006
ESKANDARI, HAMIDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021
LINDSEY, BRYCEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/2019
WILLITS, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/30/2018
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/30/2006
KEETCH, CHADIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2011
PORT, BARRYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/14/2025
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2004
WELLTOWER VICTORY II LANDLORD LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.0M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 37%Medicare 28%Other / private 35%

This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$504per resident / day
operating cost
$15,319per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$564per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555257. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next