Lemon Grove Care And Rehabilitation Center
8351 Broadway, Lemon Grove, CA 91945 · For profit - Corporation · 158 certified beds · (619) 463-0294 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.6% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.2% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 35.8% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.8% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.3% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.7% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.5% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.3% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.5% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.9% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.7% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.63 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.91 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 125 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.2%CMS range 43.7–60.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.7%CMS range 9.9–17.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 71.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 56.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 85.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.5%CMS range 5.5–14.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.34 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 158 beds and averages 151.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.44 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-18 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) failure to identify, monitor, and address problem areas identified by the State Survey team for their Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan, during their annual recertification.This failure put all residents at risk for medication errors and equipment failures.(See F-759, F-761, and F-908)An interview was conducted with the Administrator (ADM) and Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/18/25 at 5:31 P.M. The ADM and DON stated they both started at the facility three months ago. The ADM and DON stated they had reviewed last year's recertification and recognized medication administration and medication storage were both issues. The DON stated she began by monitoring, auditing, and educating staff regarding medication storage and they thought they had corrected the issues, so it was dropped from QAPI. The DON stated based on the current medication error rate during this re-certification, and the medication storage issues, they should have identified improvement was needed prior to survey.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their own Infection Control Program when: 1. There was no documented evidence regarding vaccine refusal, no documented hand hygiene surveillance and no documented evidence regarding antibiotic surveillance,Cross reference F881 2. Resident 178's oxygen tubing did not have a date, 3. Resident 8's oxygen tubing and nebulizer (liquid medication delivered as a fine mist inhaled into the lungs through a mouthpiece or mask) mask were not dated and stored properly. These failures could potentially contribute to the spread of microorganisms. 2. Resident 178 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the lungs fail to adequately exchange oxygen, leading to low oxygen in the blood) according to the facility's admission Record. During an observation on 12/15/25 at 8:47 A.M., Resident 178 was in bed with an oxygen cannula (oxygen tubing with two open prongs placed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance for 6 of 6 dependent residents with their Activities of Daily Living (ADLs, activities related to mobility and personal care) when: 1. Resident 23 was not assisted in getting up and out of bed. Cross Reference F- 679. 2. Two residents (Resident 71 and Resident 163) who were cognitively impaired were not cued to perform hand hygiene before meals. 3. Routine nail care was not provided to three residents (Residents 90, 6 and 112). As a result, the residents were at risk for skin injury, infection and overall quality of life. Findings: 1. Resident 23 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis (MS, a disease that causes breakdown of the protective covering of nerves, can cause numbness, weakness, trouble walking, vision changes and other symptoms), per the facility's admission Record. On 12/15/25, a review of Resident 23's minimum data set (MDS, a federally mandated resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1.Timely assessment, monitoring and immediate physician notification in response to significant clinical changes, including suspected gastrointestinal (referring to the stomach and intestines) bleeding and ongoing nausea or vomiting for one of three sampled residents reviewed for closed record (Resident 1). Cross Reference F 580. 2. A physician's order was obtained from the attending physician prior to blood sugar checks on a resident (Resident 9) who was on insulin (antidiabetic medication). In addition, blood sugar checks was obtained without proper time interval. This deficient practice resulted in a delay in the resident receiving treatment to address Resident 1's necessary care and services and placed Resident 1's health at risk. In addition, Resident 9 had blood sugar checks without physician's order, without appropriate time interval and caused discomfort to Resident 9. Findings: Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medication when a resident (Resident 5) was receiving rivaroxaban (blood thinner that prevents and treat blood clots, one side effect is bruising or bleeding) and was not monitored for five months for signs and symptoms of bruising/ bleeding for one of two sampled residents reviewed for anticoagulant (AC, medicines that help prevent blood clots). This failure could result in AC medication related untoward side effects from inconsistent and poor management of medication therapy for Resident 5. Cross Reference F 756 Findings: Resident 5 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body) following a stroke, per the facility's admission Record. On 12/15/25, a review of Resident 5's clinical record was conducted. There was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent. The facility's medication error rate was 19.51%. Eight medication errors were observed out of 41 opportunities, during the medication administration process for one of eight randomly observed residents (Resident 8). As a result, the facility could not ensure medications were correctly administered to all residents. In addition this deficient practice had the potential to affect the resident's health and wellbeing.Findings: Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and gastrostomy status (feeding tube in the stomach) according to the facility's admission Record. During medication administration on 12/17/25 at 9:50 A.M. an observation for Resident 8, Licensed Nurse (LN) 14 administered the following medications:-Tylenol (pain medication) 325mg two tablets by mouth-Allopurinol (for high uric acid in the blood) 100mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its own policy and procedure to establish an antibiotic stewardship program when the Infection Preventionist (IP) did not comprehensively track and monitor appropriate use of antibiotics. This failure had the risk to affect the residents in the facility due to lack of oversight and monitoring that could lead to increased infections and preventable deaths from resistant infections.Cross reference F880Findings: On 12/18/25 at 1: 17 P.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), Director of Nursing in training (DONIT), and the Director of Nursing (DON). The DSD stated she started working on April 224 with DSD role and doing Infection Preventionist (IP) role on 12/11/25. The DON stated we had our transition from 10/16/25 and the designated IP was no longer working in the facility. The October 2025 Antibiotic surveillance had 6 cases of community acquired infection (CAI) and 6 cases of healthcare associated infection(HAI). The October 2025 case mapping had 8 entries but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident equipment in a safe, functional manner for 57 of 159 residents, located in the secured unit, (specialized, secured area for residents with dementia or mental illness, who are prone to wandering), when:1. Handrails in the hallway, ( Station 3), had peeling paint, and;2. A bed remote control had exposed wires.These failures had the potential for peeling paint to be ingested by confused residents and the wires from the bed's remote control to pierce the skin of a resident.Findings:During initial tour on 12/15/25 at 10:07 A.M., an observation was conducted of the handrails outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. The handrails contained numerous layers of paint, and the white paint was peeling off in different areas.An observation and interview was conducted with Director of Maintenance (DM) on 12/16/25 at 3:50 P.M. of the hallway handrails outside Station 3's activity room. The DM was observed removing patches of white peeling paint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity for two of six residents (Resident 4 and Resident 177) when:1. Resident 177 had an uncovered urinary collection bag (when urine drains from the bladder into a clear plastic drainage bag); and,2 . A staff member stood over Resident 4, while assisting with a meal.These failures had the potential for Residents 4 and 177 to feel exposed and undignified. Findings:1. Resident 177 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], after a hospital diagnosis of bacteremia (a bacterial infection in the bloodstream), per the hospital discharge records, dated 12/11/25.During initial tour on 12/15/25 at 9:42 A.M., Resident 177's bed was empty. According to Licensed Nurse 31 (LN 31), Resident 177 was outside the secured unit (a specialized, controlled environment within a facility, for residents with mental illness or memory loss) attending a physical therapy session.An observation was conducted of LN 32 on 12/15/25 at 2:34 P.M., as she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Nurse (LN 1) notified the physician immediately, when a resident who was on anticoagulant therapy (medicines that help prevent blood clots) experienced episodes of vomiting large amount of coffee ground vomit (coffee ground vomit indicates upper gastrointestinal bleeding), for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for closed record.This deficient practice resulted in a delay in the resident receiving treatment to address Resident 1's significant change in condition and placed Resident 1's health at risk. Cross Reference F 684.Findings: Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included pneumonia (infection of the lungs), per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 1's history and physical (H&P) dated [DATE] was conducted. Per the H&P, Resident 1's Computed Tomography (CT scan, a type of imaging that uses X-ray techniques to create detailed images) of his chest, abdomen and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted for an allegation of abuse for one of one resident (Resident 162), when Resident 162 reported a male staff (RNA- restorative nursing assistant 1) inappropriately touched her. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 162's psychosocial wellbeing and the potential to expose all residents in the facility to abuse.Findings: On 12/2/25, the Department of Public Health (CDPH) received a facility reported incident for an allegation of RNA 1 inappropriately touched Resident 162's breast. On 12/15/25 at 9:25 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 162 in her room, curled up in bed. Resident 162 stated RNA 1 touched her breast in her room, but could not recall the date and time it happened. Resident 162 stated there were two unwitnessed incidents with the same staff (RNA 1). Resident 162 stated she informed her roommate (Resident 9) about the second incident. On 12/15/25 at 9:36 A.M., an interview was conducted with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer and its bed hold policy to a resident and his Responsible Party (RP) at the time of his hospital transfer for one of three residents (18) reviewed for closed record. As a result, Resident 18 and his RP were not fully informed of Resident 18's bed hold rights. Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 18 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include end stage renal disease (End Stage Renal Disease-irreversible kidney failure). On 12/17/25, a review was conducted of Resident 18's medical record. Resident 18's history and physical dated 6/24/25 indicated Resident 18 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions and the resident's family member (FM) was the RP. Per the facility's Progress Note, dated 11/24/25 at 12 A.M., Resident 18 was transferred to an acute care hospital for a change in condition. There was no documentation on 11/24/25 or 11/25/25 that Resident 18's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and code two of six residents (130 and 9) for Restorative Nursing Services (RNA-a specially training certified nursing assistant who provides range of motion exercises with residents, in order to maintain mobility and flexibility) on their Minimum Data Set (MDS-a mandated reporting assessment tool) used to inform Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), of residents' current status reviewed for MDS accuracy. This failure resulted in CMS not being informed of Resident 130's and Resident 9's current health status and services being provided.Findings: 1. Resident 130 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (stroke - a medical emergency where blood flow to part of the brain is suddenly blocked or a blood vessel bursts, depriving brain cells of oxygen and nutrients causing them to die within minutes) affecting the left side (weakness of the left extremities), per the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASSAR 2-a federally mandated process that ensures individuals with serious mental illness (SMI), intellectual disabilities (ID), developmental disabilities (DD), are not inappropriately admitted to Medicaid-certified nursing facilities (NFs) if they can be served in a more integrated, community-based setting) was completed in a timely manner for one of three residents (Resident 129) reviewed for PASSAR.The failure had the potential for Resident 129 to be improperly placed or to miss out on additional services offered for PASSAR II residents.Findings:Resident 129 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), per the facility's admission Record. An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 129 on 12/16/2025 at 8:15 A.M., in his room. Resident 129 was dressed and neatly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide individualized therapeutic and or social activities that promote the residents' highest physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, according to their plan of care for one of three reviewed residents (Resident 23). This deficient practice placed Resident 23 at risk for decreased emotional well-being, social isolation, and reduced quality of life due to the lack of meaningful engagement. Cross Reference F 677.Findings: Resident 23 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis (MS, a disease that causes breakdown of the protective covering of nerves, can cause numbness, weakness, trouble walking, vision changes and other symptoms), per the facility's admission Record. On 12/15/25, a review of Resident 23's minimum data set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 11/27/25, indicated Resident 23 could make independent reasonable decisions. The MDS also indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete post fall assessments for one of one resident (Resident 57) reviewed for accidents according to the facility's policy and procedure. This failure had the potential for not identifying the root cause of Resident 57's falls and maintain Resident 57's safety.Findings: Resident 57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia (brain damage affecting thinking, memory, judgment and walking), unspecified severity according to the facility's admission Record. During an observation of Resident 57 on 12/15/25 at 9:30 A.M., Resident 57 was in bed with a floor mat on the right side of the bed. An interview and concurrent record review on 12/17/25 at 3:08 P.M. was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 11. LN 11 stated Resident 57 used to walk independently using a front wheel walker but had declined and preferred to stay in bed most of the day. LN 11 reviewed Resident 57's progress notes from September 2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident 5) was positioned properly while tube feeding (TF-nutrition in liquid form through a tube) was ongoing per the resident's plan of care for one of two residents reviewed for TF. As a result, Resident 5 was at risk for aspiration (back up of fluid from the stomach to the lungs) and other TF complications.Findings: Resident 5 was re-admitted to the facility 7/29/25 with diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and a gastrostomy (opening in the stomach created surgically), per the facility's admission Record. On 12/16/25 at 9:38 A.M., an observation of Resident 5 in the room was conducted. Resident 5 was lying flat on bed while a TF was infusing. On 12/16/25 at 10:40 A.M., a joint observation of Resident 5 and an interview was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 32. LN 32 stated Resident 5's TF would have been completed at 10 A.M. LN 32 stated Resident 5's head of bed was flat and should have been elevated to prevent Resident 5 from aspiration that could have led to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess respiratory status during a nebulizer treatment (liquid medication delivered as a fine mist inhaled into the lungs through a mouthpiece or mask) for two of two residents (Resident 178 and Resident 8) reviewed for respiratory care. This failure had the potential for residents to receive inappropriate care and treatment to address their respiratory problems.Findings: 1.Resident 178 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the lungs fail to adequately exchange oxygen, leading to low oxygen in the blood) according to the facility's admission Record. On 12/17/25 at 8:55 A.M. Resident 178's family member notified Licensed Nurse (LN) 14 that Resident 178 had difficulty breathing. LN 14 informed Resident 178's family member that he will administer a nebulizer treatment to Resident 178 to help with the breathing. LN 14 took a medication in a plastic vial from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address and implement the Consulting Pharmacist's (CP) recommendation during a monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) regarding a psychotropic medication (a medication that affects brain function), for one of five residents (Resident 99), for Medication Review. In addition, the CP did not identify monitoring of untoward side effects of anticoagulant (AC, blood thinner medication) for one of two residents (Resident 5) reviewed for AC (Cross Reference F 757). This failure had the potential for Resident 99 not to be monitored appropriately by staff for exhibiting specific behaviors. In addition, Resident 5 was not monitored for untoward side effects of AC for five months.Findings: Resident 99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia, (a mental illness marked by intense paranoia, delusions [false beliefs, often persecutory], and auditory hallucinations [hearing voices]), according to the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications had proper storage and labeling when:1. Two tablets were found loose and unlabeled inside a medication drawer,2. Expired medications were stored inside the medication refrigerator These failures had the potential for medications to be incorrectly administered and decrease medication potency (medication strength) that could compromise the therapeutic effectiveness of stored medications.Findings: 1. A medication storage observation was conducted on 12/17/25 at 7:52 A.M., at station 1. Licensed Nurse 14 (LN 14) opened the second drawer of the medication cart which contained medication cards for residents. A small orange and small white tablet were found loose and unlabeled at the bottom of the drawer. LN 14 stated he was unsure why there were loose tablets in the medication drawer. LN 14 stated the medication cards listed residents' names and drug names. LN 14 stated there should not be any loose and unlabeled medications in the medication cart because staff would not know what the medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff carried out the tasks of the food and nutrition services department in accordance with the standard of practice for the following kitchen competencies: 1. [NAME] (CK) 1 did not demonstrate how to conduct spoon tilt tests (food must hold its shape on a spoon and when tilted, it should fall off with little residue) of pureed food. 2. CK 2 did not know how to calibrate food thermometers. These failures had the potential to expose all residents who consumed food from the kitchen to contract a food-borne illness. Findings: 1.On 12/17/25 at 10:16 A.M., a joint observation of CK 1 performing spoon tilt test of pureed food with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) and the Registered Dietitian (RD) present; and an interview with CK 1 was conducted. CK 1 took the pureed brussels sprouts in a metal bin off the heating rack, took a spoon filled of the pureed brussels sprouts, performed spoon tilt test, returned the spoon filled to the puree, mixed the puree, took another scoop or pureed brussels…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain written consents and educational proof that residents and their responsible persons (RPs-a person assign to make medical decisions on behalf of the resident) were informed of the risk and benefits for receiving or declining pneumococcal (an immunization protecting against streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria, which causes severe infections) and influenza vaccines (prevents the seasonal flu, a contagious respiratory illness) for two of five residents (Resident 14 and 121), reviewed for vaccinations. As a result, Residents 4 and 121, along with their RPs were not informed of the risks and benefits, if the vaccine was received or declined.1. Resident 121 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought). Resident 121 also had a documented Durable Power of Attorney for medical consent only, according to the facility's admission Record. On 12/18/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain written consents and educational proof that residents and their responsible persons (RPs-a person assign to make medical decisions on behalf of the resident) were informed of the risks and benefits for receiving or declining the SARS-COV-2 vaccine (prevents severe COVID-19 illness, a highly contagious respiratory virus), for two of five residents (Resident 14 and 121), reviewed for vaccinations. As a result, Residents 4 and 121, along with their RPs were not informed of the risks and benefits, or if the vaccine was received or declined.Findings:1. Resident 121 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought). Resident 121 also had a documented Durable Power of Attorney for medical consent only, according to the facility's admission Record. On 12/18/25 at 9:39 A.M., Resident 121's clinical record was reviewed for immunizations. According to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the required resident assessment for 1 resident reviewed for accuracy of assessments. This failure had the potential for not identifing Resident 1's needs. Findings: An unanounced visit was made to the facility on [DATE] in response to a report of a fall. Record review was initiatied on 12/10/24. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with health conditions which ncluded need for assistance with personal care and unspecified hearing loss according to the admission Record. On 12/10/24 at 11:38 A.M., Licensed Nurse (LN) 3 was interviewed. LN 3 stated Resident 1 was deaf, and preferred to have staff write questions to her, and she would answer verbally. On 12/10/24 at 11:40 A.M., Resident 1 was interviewed. The questions were written and answered verbally by Resident 1. Resident 1 laughed when asked if one ear was better than another. Resident 1 stated both ears are crap. On 12/10/24 at 2:10 P.M., an interview and joint review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0620 — isolatedNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their admission policy when one of three residents (Resident 1) was admitted to the facility without sufficient information to determine if appropriate care and services could be provided to the resident. As a result of this deficient practice, the facility sent Resident 1 back to the hospital which had the potential to cause the resident distress. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 6/19/24. On 11/14/24 at 4:24 P.M., a telephone interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 stated he met with the facility's admissions marketer (AM) while he was at the hospital. Resident 1 stated he had disclosed his parole status to the AM and that he wore an ankle monitor as a condition of his parole. Resident 1 stated he was admitted to the facility, given a room and bed, and was provided dinner. Resident 1 stated everything was fine until the next…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) was permitted to remain in the facility when the resident was discharged to the hospital without a valid clinical reason. This deficient practice had to potential to cause Resident 1 to experience psychosocial and emotional distress. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 6/19/24. On 11/14/24 at 4:24 P.M., a telephone interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 stated he met with the facility's admissions marketer (AM) while he was at the hospital. Resident 1 stated he had disclosed his parole status to the AM and that he wore an ankle monitor as a condition of his parole. Resident 1 stated he was admitted to the facility, given a room and bed, and was provided dinner. Resident 1 stated everything was fine until the next morning when an administrative staff member came into his room and asked about his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update the care plan with resident-specific interventions for one of one resident reviewed for falls (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to sustain further falls. Findings: According to the admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with memory and communicating needs) , and early onset Alzheimer ' s disease (a disease which affects memory). A review of Resident 1's MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool) indicated for showering, Resident 1 was dependent on staff. The MDS indicated, Dependent- Helper does ALL of the effort. Resident does none of the effort to complete the activity. Or, the assistance of 2 or more helpers is required for the resident to complete the activity. On 9/27/24 at 9:17 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 stated she had a fall in the shower, while sitting in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation in the clinical record was accurate for one of two residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Licensed nurses (LN) documented Lithium (a mood stabilizing medication) as having been administered to the Resident 1 when the medication was unavailable. 2. Resident 1 ' s documented behavior monitoring did not reflect accurate observations of the resident ' s behavior. As a result, Resident 1 ' s clinical record did not accurately reflect the care and treatment that was provided. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include schizophrenia (mental illness characterized by paranoia, hallucinations, and/or delusions) and acquired absence of left upper limb above the elbow. 1. On 9/5/24, a record review was conducted. Resident 1 ' s readmitting orders from [hospital name] dated 8/19/24, indicated the resident was to take Lithium 300…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement resident-centered care plans related to: 1. Resident 47 was not assessed for activities. 2. Resident 42 was not assessed for triggers related to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD- a condition in which a person has difficulty recovering after witnessing or experiencing a terrifying event). 3. The central port (a line used for dialysis access) was not identified or did not provide direction of care for Resident 32. 4. In addition, turning and repositioning was not implemented for Resident 43. As a result, there was not a consistent approach by staff to address residents' care needs. Findings: 1. Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture of thoracic vertebra (bones of the spine). A concurrent observation and interview was conducted on 8/12/24 at 11:49 A.M. with Resident 47. Resident 47 was observed sitting in her wheelchair in her room, looking out at the garden and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were safely stored when: 1. The medication refrigerator temperature log was incomplete. 2. A food product was found stored in a medication cart. 3. A discontinued medication was not discarded from a medication cart. 4. A medication cart was not locked and unsecured. 5. A medication was left unattended at a resident's bedside. As a result, refrigerator medications could have been ineffective if not stored at the correct temperature, food could cause cross contamination to medications, discontinued medication could have been accidentally been administered, and unauthorized residents, visitors and staff could have access to medications, which could be harmful. Findings: 1. An observation, interview, and record review of the facility's medication room was conducted with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 8/15/24 at 8:21 A.M. The refrigerator daily temperature log had missing entries for the day shift (7 A.M. to 3:30 P.M.) on 8/13/24 and 8/14/24. The ADON stated with no documentation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 106) was assisted with a meal in a dignified manner. This failure had the potential for Resident 106 to experience a diminished self-worth. Findings: Resident 106 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included epilepsy (seizures), per the facility's admission Record. An observation was conducted from the hallway on 8/12/24 at 12:23 P.M. of a staff member feeding Resident 106 in her room. Resident 1 was sitting up in bed and slightly slumped to the right. A staff member was standing on the right side of the bed, feeding the resident a pureed diet (food that has a soft pudding-like consistency). The staff member was standing approximately two feet above the resident's head, looking downward. On 8/12/24 at 12:24 P.M., the staff member was called out from the room. The staff member identified herself as Speech Therapist 1 (ST 1). ST 1 stated she was feeding Resident 106, to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure privacy was provided to one of 29 residents (Resident 32) during personal care. As a result, there was the potential for Resident 32 to feel embarrassed and distressed. Findings: A review of Resident 32's admission Record indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). A review of Resident 32's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a comprehensive assessment tool) dated 7/16/24, indicated the resident scored 03 on the brief interview of mental status (a score of 03 meant the resident was severely cognitively impaired). On 8/12/24 at 9:40 A.M., an observation was conducted from the hallway outside of Resident 32's room. The door opened to Resident 32's room, and certified nursing assistant (CNA) 50 left the room carrying a bag of soiled items. Resident 32 was visible from the hallway while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide activities of interest for one of one residents (47) reviewed for activities. This failure had the potential to not maintain or improve Resident 47's physical, mental and psychosocial well-being and independence. Findings: Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture of thoracic vertebra (bones of the spine). A concurrent observation and interview was conducted on 8/12/24 at 11:49 A.M. with Resident 47. Resident 47 was observed sitting in her wheelchair in her room, looking out at the garden and fountain. Resident 47 stated she was bored and did not attend activities because, The games were for 2 year olds. An interview was conducted on 8/14/24 at 9:20 A.M. with the Activity Director (AD). The AD stated, This resident does not want to do activities. An activity/interest assessment was never completed and should have been within five days after admission. A review of Resident 47's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident with a past trauma received trauma informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one of one residents (42 ) reviewed for trauma informed care. As a result, there was the potential for the resident to not have a sense of emotional and physical safety. Findings: Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD- a condition in which a person has difficulty recovering after witnessing or experiencing a terrifying event) according to the facility's admission Record. A concurrent observation and interview was conducted on 8/12/24 at 3 P.M. with Resident 42. Resident 42 was reclining in his bed, watching TV. Resident 42 only wanted to discuss the weather. A review of Resident 42's care plan was reviewed on 8/13/24 at 8:30 A.M. The care plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four licensed nurses (LN) 10 was competent (a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully) to perform medication administration. As result, the medications LN 10 administered to Resident 43 did not consistently adhere to the physician's order, were incompletely given, had hold parameters that were not verified, medications were left unattended, acceptable infection control standards were not implemented, and documentation in the medication administration record (MAR) was inaccurate. These deficiencies had the potential to effect resident safety and the efficacy of treatment. Cross reference F759, F761, F842, and F880. Findings: A review of Resident 43's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent. The facility's medication error rate was 8.33 percent. Three (3) medication errors were observed, a total of 36 opportunities, during the medication administration process for two (2) of five randomly observed residents (Residents 10 and 43). As a result, the facility could not ensure medications were correctly administered to all residents. Cross reference F726. Findings: On 8/14/24 at 9:05 A.M., a medication administration was observed with LN 10. LN 10 began to dispense Resident 43's medications into individual, unlabeled medication cups (30 milliliters/ml size), including but not limited to: Lactulose 25 ml (promotes bowel movement) Vitamin D 50 micrograms (mcg) (LN 10 crushed the tablets into a powder). At 9:12 A.M., LN 10 donned personal protective equipment (PPE, gown and gloves) and entered Resident 43's room to administer the medications. LN 10 checked the placement of Resident 43's g-tube (tube surgically inserted through the abdominal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 29 sampled residents (Resident 122) received food and drink that was palatable, appetizing, and attractive, when the resident was served nectar thick beverages (liquids that had a thickener added to make the consistency like nectar) and some pureed food items (food blended to a pudding-like texture) without a physician's order or clear indication. As a result, Resident 122 stated she did not want to eat the food which put the resident at risk for unintended weight loss and malnutrition. Findings: A review of Resident 122's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 8/12/24 at 11:18 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 122 while inside the resident's room. Resident 122 stated she did not have teeth and that her teeth had got stolen on the street. Resident 122 was observed with missing teeth. Resident 122 stated she had to eat a pureed diet since being here and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation of medication administration was accurate in one of five residents' (Resident 43) medication administration record (MAR). This failure had the potential to not accurately reflect the treatments provided to residents. Findings: A review of Resident 43's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness) affecting right side following a stroke, hypertension, dementia (memory loss), and gastrostomy (opening into the abdominal wall for insertion of a feeding tube [g-tube]). On 8/14/24 at 9:03 A.M., a medication administration was observed with LN 10. LN 10 began to dispense Resident 43's medications into individual, unlabeled medication cups (30 milliliters/ml size) as followed: 1. Amlodipine 2.5 mg (controls blood pressure [LN 10 crushed the tablet into a powder]) 2. Apixaban 5 mg (anticoagulant [LN 10 crushed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents' (Resident 43) medication administration followed acceptable infection control practices when licensed nurse (LN) 10 attempted to administer a medication that had been disposed of in the trash can. This deficient practice had the potential to expose Resident 43 to infection via the resident's g-tube (a tube surgically placed through the abdominal wall for medication administration and liquid feeding). Cross reference F726. Findings: A review of Resident 43's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness) affecting right side following a stroke, hypertension, dementia (memory loss), and gastrostomy (opening into the abdominal wall for insertion of a feeding tube [g-tube]). A review of Resident 43's physician orders dated 4/11/24, indicated, Enhanced Barrier Precautions: [interventions used to control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Residents were free from physical and verbal abuse when Resident 3, who had a history of hitting others and wandering, wandered around the facility, entered other resident rooms, and start altercations while unsupervised. On five separate occasions (12/26/22, 1/26/23, 2/17/23, 3/13/23, and 9/12/23) Resident 3 entered other residents ' rooms/personal space wherein she yelled and cussed at, pulled hair, slapped, and hit other residents. 2. After Resident 3 had repeatedly verbally and physically abused other residents, the facility failed to implement close supervision of the resident when wandering to prevent further incidents from occurring. 3. This continued failure to provide close supervision when Resident 3 wandered lead to a sixth incident of physical abuse on 1/13/24, when Resident 3 entered Resident 1 ' s room and started an altercation by hitting the resident ' s arms and taking the resident ' s personal items. As a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its abuse policies were implemented when certified nursing assistant (CNA) 4 did not report Resident 1 ' s allegation of physical abuse. In addition, the facility did not report the allegation of abuse within 24 hours to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH, state survey agency that regulates nursing homes) and law enforcement entity as was mandated by law. As a result of this deficient practice, investigation into the allegation of abuse was delayed and placed residents at risk for further abuse. Cross reference F600. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include paralysis and weakness affecting the right side of the body following a stroke. A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a comprehensive assessment) dated 12/15/23, indicated the resident scored 15 on the brief interview of mental status (a score of 13-15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident ' s (Resident 3) written care plan for wandering behavior was implemented when incidents of wandering and what diversional activity was attempted were not consistently documented. As a result, the facility could not track Resident 3 ' s incidents of wandering and what diversional activity may or may not have been effective. Cross reference F600 and F609. Findings: A review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include bipolar disorder (a mood disorder characterized by depression and mania) and dementia (characterized by memory loss and lack of judgement serious enough to affect daily activities) with behavioral disturbance and psychotic (abnormal thinking and perception) disturbance. A review of Resident 3 ' s written care plan for Wanderer: Resident self-propelling wheelchair into the hallway and going into other residents ' rooms,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise/update Resident 3 ' s written care plan to provide close supervision when the resident was wandering around the facility after Resident 3 had incidents of entering other residents ' rooms that resulted in resident-to-resident altercations. As a result of this deficiency, Resident 3 continued to wander into other residents ' rooms and those residents experienced abuse or were at risk for experiencing abuse. Cross reference F600. Findings: A review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include bipolar disorder (a mood disorder characterized by depression and mania) and dementia (characterized by memory loss and lack of judgement serious enough to affect daily activities) with behavioral disturbance and psychotic (abnormal thinking and perception) disturbance. A review of Resident 3 ' s interdisciplinary team (IDT) note dated 12/27/22, indicated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of three residents (Resident 1) that: 1. Certified nursing assistants (CNA) completed the required documentation of Resident 1's bowel movements each shift, and 2. Licensed nurses (LNs) followed up on the accuracy and completeness of CNA documentation for Resident 1's bowel movements to determine if bowel protocol (systematic interventions to prevent/address constipation) needed to be initiated. As a result, there was the potential for documentation that was incomplete and not followed up on to affect the residents' health and well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility 6/16/23. A review of CNA documentation titled Documentation Survey Report v2, for Resident 1's July 2023 bowel movements indicated, CNAs were required to document each shift (AM shift 7 A.M. to 3 P.M., PM shift 3 P.M. to 11 P.M., and Night shift 11 P.M. to 7 A.M.). The CNA documentation were incomplete with blank entries on: 7/2, 7/8, 7/9, 7/10, 7/14, 7/15, 7/16, 7/19 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide catheter (tube inserted into the bladder) care for four of four residents (19, 61, 123 and 126). This failure had the potential to increase the risk of infection for residents. Findings: 1. Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included paraplegia (partial or complete paralysis of lower half of the body), per the facility's admission Record. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS, assessment tool), dated 12/14/21, Resident 19 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment of the resident's ability to remember and reason) score of 13 (13-15 meant cognitively intact) which indicated, the resident was cognitively intact. On 3/14/22 at 3:42 P.M., an observation and interview with Resident 19 was conducted. Resident 19 was seated with a catheter attached to the bed. Resident 19 stated the staff did nothing to clean his catheter. Resident 19 stated the staff did not assist with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to support one of 29 resident's (81) choice for medical treatment. As a result, Resident 81 was given medication without her consent. Findings: A review of Resident 81's admission record, indicated the facility admitted Resident 81 on 4/26/21 with a diagnosis that included Atrial Fibrillation, a heartbeat that is irregular. A review of Resident 81's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 1/31/22, indicated Resident 81 had the capacity to make her own decisions. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/16/22 at 1:49 P.M., Resident 81 stated she was able to care for herself and could tell the nurses what she needed. Resident 81 stated she knew what she needed. A review of Resident 81's physicians active orders for March 2022, indicated she received a medication called Digoxin to treat her irregular heartbeat, Atrial Fibrillation. During a concurrent interview and record review with LN 11 on 03/17/22 at 8:23 A.M., LN 11 stated Resident 81 refused her Digoxin. LN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge for one of three sampled residents (146). As a result, Resident 146 was discharged to a homeless shelter where her medical and daily needs could not be met. Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 146 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included major neurocognitive disorder (bipolar disorder) and increased need for assistance with personal care. On 3/15/22, a review of Resident 146's records from the acute hospital titled, Discharge Summary Notes, dated, 3/19/21 indicated, .Psychiatry . with history of cancer and major neurocognitive disorder thought to be secondary to chronic alcohol . On 3/15/22, a review of the facility's psychiatrist notes dated 4/23/21, indicated, .Lacks decision making capacity . On 3/15/22 at 10:28 A.M., the Social Services Director (SSD) was interviewed. The SSD stated, Resident 146 was discharged to a homeless shelter on 3/8/22. On 3/16/22 at 10:40 A.M., LN 21 was interviewed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed related to suprapubic catheter (tubing inserted to the bladder through a small hole in the belly to drain urine) care for one of four residents (61) reviewed for catheter care. As a result, Resident 61 was at risk for developing an infection. Findings: Resident 61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute kidney failure (when kidneys lost their filtering ability), per the facility's admission Record. According to Resident 61's History and Physical (H & P) dated 11/8/21, the wound physician indicated Resident 61 was self- responsible, alert, and oriented to person and situation. On 3/14/22 at 3:40 P.M., an observation and interview of Resident 61 in his room was conducted. Resident 61 was awake in bed, with catheter bag connected to the bed rail. Resident 61 stated he did not know if the staff were cleaning his catheter. On 3/16/22 at 10:10 A.M., an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide adequate monitoring for one of 29 resident's (81) medical condition. This created the potential for Resident 81 to have higher amounts of drugs in her system and increase the likelihood of side-effects related to her medication orders. Findings: A review of Resident 81's admission record, indicated the facility admitted Resident 81 on 4/26/21, with a chronic kidney disease which impaired her ability to adequately excrete certain medications. A record review of Resident 81's lab values on 12/21/21 showed her chronic kidney disease had progressed to stage four. In stage 4 chronic kidney disease Resident 81 has had severely damaged kidneys with decreased ability to metabolize and excrete certain medications. This increased the accumulation of active drugs in her system and increased her risk for adverse effects, such as mental confusion, from the drugs. A record review of Resident 81's physician's orders for March of 2022 indicated she received Digoxin for her irregular heartbeat. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Licensed Nurse (LN) followed the physician's order and the facility's policy and procedure prior to administration of medication through a tube feeding (tube surgically inserted into stomach to provide medications and nutrition) for one of one residents (85). This failure had the potential for Resident 85 to not receive the full dose of medications administered. Findings: Resident 85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body and gastrostomy (a tube feeding inserted directly into the stomach), per the facility admission Record. On 3/16/22 at 9:22 A.M., an observation of medication administration was conducted with LN 31 in Resident 85's room. LN 31 flushed the gastrostomy tube with 30 cc (30 cubic centimeters) of water before, then administered each medication separately through the tube then flushed the tube with 40 cc of water. On 3/16/22, a record review was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent. The facility's medication error rate was 6.25 %. Two medications errors were observed out of 32 opportunities, during the medication administration process for two of 5 randomly observed residents (Resident 62, 69, 84, 85 and 86). As a result, the facility could not ensure medications were correctly administered to all residents. Findings: 1. On 3/16/22 at 9:08 A.M., an observation of medication administration was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 31. LN 31 prepared and administered medication to Resident 62. On 3/16/22 at 2:49 P.M., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with LN 31. LN 31 stated he administered Cranberry 425 mg to Resident 62. LN 31 stated he did not call the doctor to change or clarify the order. On 3/16/22 a record review was conducted. Resident 62 had a Physician's Order for Cranberry tablet 450 mg (450 milligrams) by mouth one time a day. On 3/17/22 at 8:54 A.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and discard potentially hazardous food. As a result, all residents were at risk for food borne illness. Findings: On 3/14/22 at 8 A.M., a concurrent observation of the kitchen and interview with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) was conducted. The dairy/ snacks refrigerator had a tray with 12 containers filled with lime-colored jello and nine containers filled with yellow-colored jello. The label on the tray indicated, Prep date 3/10/22, Use by 3/12/22. The DS stated, The jello should have been thrown out. On 3/14/22 at 8 A.M., in the same refrigerator, a tray of sandwiches was observed. All sandwiches were wrapped in cellophane and marked with a black marker indicating what kind of sandwich it was and a label with a date. One sandwich was marked HC and the label indicated, 3/9. DS stated, The HC means ham and cheese and the date on the label is the date it was prepared. The DS further stated, The sandwiches are good for 3-4 days, the ham and cheese sandwich should have been thrown out. On 3/14/22 at 8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0911 — isolatedEnsure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the requirement for the accommodation of no more than four residents per resident room. This affected two of 65 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and 112). rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were occupied by five resident beds in each room. Findings: On 3/14/22 through 3/17/22, multiple observations were conducted of the five residents who occupied room [ROOM NUMBER] and the five resident beds for room [ROOM NUMBER]. room [ROOM NUMBER] had four residents at the time of this survey. There were no observed problems with the provision of care for the residents on the mornings of 3/14/22 through 3/17/22. Residents were using wheelchairs and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNAs) were able to wheel the residents out of the rooms without difficulty. On 3/14/22 at 3:35 P.M., an interview was conducted with an unsampled resident (105) in room [ROOM NUMBER]. There were no complaints from the resident regarding the number of residents occupying the room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0911 — patternEnsure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the requirement for the accommodation of no more than four residents per resident room. This affected two of 65 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and 112). rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were occupied by five residents in each room. This failure had the potential for residents to feel crowded.Findings:On 12/15/25 through 12/18/25, multiple observations were conducted of the five male residents who occupied room [ROOM NUMBER] and the five female residents who occupied room [ROOM NUMBER]. There were no observed problems with the provision of care for the residents. Residents were observed using wheelchairs and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were able to wheel the residents in and out of the rooms without difficulty. On 12/18/2025 at 10:57 A.M., interviews were conducted with residents in room [ROOM NUMBER].There were no complaints from the residents regarding the number of residents occupying the room or concerns regarding space.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| KAMBO, AMANPREET | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/27/2017 |
| MURALIDHARA, SOWMYA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/15/2025 |
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 02/28/2019 |
| KEETCH, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2011 |
| PORT, BARRY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/22/2015 |
| WILLITS, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 04/29/2019 |
| LINCARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/01/2003 |
| ENSIGN SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2003 |
| MCS PGCH LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2003 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055182. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.