Fairmont Rehabilitation Hospital

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 337 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 161 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.78 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 54.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.77 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in food handling, storage, and preparation areas for 53 residents who received meals from the kitchen when:1. Debris was present inside the clean utensils drawer;2. Mold was found inside a bag of cherries stored in the refrigerator;3. Cereal container lids were found loose;4. An opened box of iced tea bags in the dry goods area contained a plastic bag with a hole;5. Four spice containers were observed with lids that were open and could not be closed;6. Two large spice containers with screw-top lids were not tightly sealed;7. The casserole scalloped potatoes box was not properly sealed;8. Inconsistent food labeling was observed, including multiple opened liquid seasonings and sweetener that lacked open-by-dates; 9. Wet snack containers were found stacked in a cabinet;10. The food preparation table was found with debris and dust accumulation;11. One cutting board was in use in the kitchen, limiting the ability to properly clean and sanitize between tasks;12. The oven/range was found…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote, maintain, and protect the dignity and privacy for one of eighteen sampled residents (Resident 5) when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 did not fully close the privacy curtain during a bed bath, resulting in Resident 5's body being exposed and visible from the hallway; and, 2. Resident 5's nephrostomy (a thin, flexible tube is inserted through the skin of your lower back directly into your kidney to drain urine) drainage bag (urinary bag) was not covered with a dignity bag (privacy bag). These deficient practices resulted in unnecessary exposure of Resident 5 during care and had the potential for loss of privacy and dignity, and increased psychosocial distress (embarrassment, anxiety and feelings of humiliation). Findings: During a review of Resident 5's clinical record titled, FACE SHEET, dated 5/6/26, the record indicated Resident 5 with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction ( kidney swelling secondary to kidney stones…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of 1 of 18 sampled residents (Resident 68) when Resident 68's call light (devices used to contact staff for assistance) was not within his reach.This failure placed Resident 68 at increased risk for unmet care needs, delayed staff response, falls, and increased the potential for accidents or injury.Findings:During a review of Resident 68's clinical record titled, Face Sheet, dated 5/6/26, the record indicated that Resident 68 had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, need for assistance with personal care, hemiplegia (inability to move one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke, a sudden lack of oxygen to the brain) affecting the right dominant side, muscle weakness, aphasia (a language disorder caused by brain damage most commonly from a stroke that impairs the ability to speak, write, and understand language), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing, indicating a disruption in the process of moving food or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to act upon the concerns brought forth from the Resident Council (a group of residents that meet and discuss concerns monthly) when Resident Council concerns of call lights not being answered timely, call lights being wrapped around the bed frame, staff speaking another language, and staff not fully completing Activities of Daily Living (ADL- these are the fundamental, routine self-care tasks individuals perform daily such as eating, bathing, dressing, toileting, and moving around) care before leaving the room were not addressed by the facility in a timely manner.This failure resulted in residents declining to attend the Resident Council meeting scheduled on 3/24/26 and feeling that issues brought forth in Resident Council meetings were not being addressed. Findings: During a review of Resident 23's clinical record titled, Face Sheet, dated 5/7/26, the record indicated that Resident 23 was admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a fall intervention for 1 of 18 sampled residents (Resident 8), when fall mat was not placed at Resident 8's bedside. This failure had the potential for Resident 8 to sustain further falls with injury. Findings:A review of Resident 8's admission Record indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive, treatable, but generally irreversible lung condition that restricts airflow, making it hard to breathe), schizophrenia (a chronic and severe brain disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and acts, often causing them to struggle with distinguishing reality from fantasy), and anxiety disorder (serious, treatable mental health conditions characterized by excessive, persistent fear or worry that interferes with daily life).A review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated 1/12/26, Resident 8 scored 0 out of 15 in a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated she had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete records for one of eighteen sampled residents (Resident 5) when, Resident 5's allergy to Levaquin (an antibiotic medication used to kill bacteria causing illness) was not updated in Resident 5's allergy profile, Resident 5 was ordered and administered Levaquin, and there was no documentation regarding communication with the ordering provider regarding the allergy, no documentation of an IDT (interdisciplinary team; a group of healthcare professionals) meeting discussing the medication allergy, or monitoring of any adverse reactions to the medication. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 5 at risk for adverse reactions and the care and services provided would not be known across all disciplines to assist in making medical decisions for Resident 5. Findings:During a review of Resident 5's clinical record titled, Face Sheet, dated 5/7/26, the record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to practice appropriate infection prevention and control measures for a census of 53 residents when Resident 67's urinal (portable, handheld containers designed for men with limited mobility to urinate while in bed or seated) was not labeled with identifying information.This failure had the potential to spread infection and cause health problems to the residents in the facility.Findings:During a review of Resident 67's clinical record titled, Face Sheet, dated 5/6/26, the record indicated that Resident 67 had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, need for assistance with personal care, hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting right dominant side (a type of ischemic stroke, accounting for about 80% of all strokes, caused by blocked blood flow to the brain, leading to tissue death [necrosis]).During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/4/26 at 10:33 AM with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 3, Resident 67's urinal was observed. CNA 3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to submit a summary of investigation for an alleged resident to resident altercation to the Department within five (5) working days, as required, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for further resident to resident altercations.Findings:Review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to thefacility with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (ongoing problems with memory and thinking), chronic kidney disease (long term kidney damage), other symptoms and signs involving cognitive (the brain's mental processes of acquiring knowledge, understanding, and thinking) functions and awareness.Review of Resident 5's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 5 was admitted to thefacility with diagnoses including orthopedic aftercare (care and recovery support after bone, joint, or muscle surgery or injury), displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur (broken upper thigh bone near the hip), history of falling, abnormalities of gait and mobility, type 2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan (written plan that guides staff on daily care and safety based on the resident's needs) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to address Resident 1's frequent and extended use of a shared bathroom, which delayed other residents' access to the bathroom.This failure resulted in dissatisfaction among those residents and placed Resident 1 at potential risk for further altercations with other residents.Findings:Review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (ongoing problems with memory and thinking), chronic kidney disease (long term kidney damage), other symptoms and signs involving cognitive (the brain's mental processes of acquiring knowledge, understanding, and thinking) functions and awareness. Review of the document titled, Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse, completed and submitted to the Department on 11/8/25 by the Social Service Director (SSD), indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive water safety management program based on nationally accepted standards to minimize the risk of Legionella (a serious lung infection) and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens (a microorganism [bacteria] that exists in water sources or plumbing [pipes required for the water supply, heating and sanitation in a building] systems that can cause serious illness in people over [AGE] years of age and have weakened immune systems) for a census of 54 when: a. The facility did not complete and document a facility-wide assessment of potential Legionella growth areas to include flow chart, b. The facility did not implement adequate control measures, c. The facility did not establish sufficient monitoring protocols; and, d. The facility did not create an intervention plan for when control limits are not met. These failures put the residents and staff at risk of potential Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $985K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA