Lomita Post-Acute Care Center
1955 Lomita Blvd, Lomita, CA 90717 · For profit - Individual · 71 certified beds · (310) 325-1970 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.3% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.5% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 3.2% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.7% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.5% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.7% | 93.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.3% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.4% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.93 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.83 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
63.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 383 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 46.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 145 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.81 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 63.0%CMS range 58.8–67.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 8.0–13.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 49.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 53.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.8–10.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.29 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 71 beds and averages 62.3 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.33 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of four sampled residents (Residents 2, 3 and 4) were assisted with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs- activities related to personal care) in a timely manner.This deficient practice had the potential to result in skin breakdown and falls for Residents 2, 3 and 4 and could negatively affect the Residents' psychosocial well-being. Findings: During an observation on 2/10/2026 at 12:20 p.m., Resident 4's call light (a communication tool that allows residents to alert nursing staff when they need assistance) was on. A Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN), Physical Therapist (PT), and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were observed passing by Resident 4's room without responding to the call light. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]., with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents (Resident 25 and Resident 35) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activity related to mental processes and behavior) by failing to:1. Ensure an appropriate diagnosis and evaluation was conducted for Resident 35 before starting the treatment with Seroquel ([generic name - quetiapine] a medication used to treat schizophrenia [a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought], bipolar disorder [sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs] and as an adjunct treatment option for depression (a serious mood disorder causing persistent sadness and loss of interest, affecting thoughts, feelings, and daily activities). 2.Ensure Resident 25 who was taking Lexapro (antidepressant - medicine used to treat depression) had a diagnosis of depression (serious mood disorder causing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to improve or maintain range of motion ([ROM] full movement potential of a joint) for two of eight sampled residents (Residents 52 and 65) with ROM concerns by failing to: 1. Objectively measure Resident 65's limited finger ROM of the left hand during the Occupational Therapy (OT, profession that provides services to increase and/or maintain a person's capability to participate in everyday life activities) Evaluation, dated 3/25/2025.2. Provide ROM exercises to Resident 65's right knee during a Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA, nursing aide program that helps residents maintain any progress made after therapy intervention to maintain their function) session in accordance with physician's orders.3. Provide RNA ROM exercises to Resident 65's both arms and both legs, three (3) times a week, and apply a splint (rigid material or apparatus used to support and immobilize a broken bone or impaired joint) to Resident 65's left hand for two (2) to four (4) hours, 4 times a week in accordance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% (percent) during medication pass, affecting four of five sampled residents (Residents 11, 29, 18 and 35) by failing to:1. Administer Resident 11's ferrous sulfate (a medication used to treat low levels of iron) within one hour of its prescribed time as per facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Administering Medications, dated 4/2019.2. Administer Resident 29's ferrous sulfate within one hour of its prescribed time as per facility's P&P titled, Administering Medications, dated 4/2019.3. Ensure Resident 18's lidocaine patch (a medication in the form of a patch used to treat inflammation and pain) was dated with the date of application and removed after 12 hours of application, in accordance with manufacturer specifications.4. Ensure the facility's licensed nurse did not crush and mix Resident 35's acetaminophen (a medication used to treat fever and pain) and aspirin (a medication used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents for unnecessary medications review (Resident 3) was free from significant medication errors, by failing to follow parameters for pain level and ensuring hydrocodone (a controlled substance or also known as an opioid [medications that the use and possession of are controlled by the federal government] a medication used to treat pain) in combination with acetaminophen (APAP - a medication used to treat fever and pain) and morphine (a controlled substance or also known as an opioid used to treat severe pain) were only administered to Resident 3 for the prescribed pain score parameters, affecting one of five sampled residents for unnecessary medications review. This deficient practice had the potential to result in excessive sedation (the process of calming or relaxing a person, often by administering medication), opioid overdose, respiratory depression, hospitalization and death.Findings:During a review of Resident 3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was properly labeled, monitored, and handled in a sanitary manner, to ensure that dietary staff had effective systems and oversight to safely perform assigned duties, creating the potential for food contamination (when food becomes unsafe or spoiled by harmful substances) and adverse resident outcomes by failing to: 1. Properly label and date food items.2. Monitor and document cold storage temperatures. 3. Monitor and document sanitation and equipment temperatures.4. Ensure the ice machine had a monitoring log for sanitation. These failures placed residents at risk for expired, spoiled contaminated food, foodborne illness (illness cause by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins), bacterial contamination (food, multiplied to unsafe levels), infection, hospitalization, and decline in overall health status. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/8/2025 at 8:35 a.m. with [NAME] (CK) 1, the following was observed in refrigerator #1, there were multiple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement proper infection control practices. The facility failed to:1. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 wash hands before administering Artificial Tears eye drops (a medication used to treat dryness and itchiness in eyes) to Resident 18 during medication pass observation.2.Ensure open trash bags were not left on top of linen hampers.3.Ensure sorting of dirty linens were not performed in the same area where clean clothes were removed from washing machines.4.Ensure non-disposable yellow gown were not left hanging on the wall next to the clean area of the laundry room.These failures had the potential to spread infection and cause cross-contamination (the transfer of bacteria, viruses, microorganisms, or other harmful substances from one surface to another through improper or unsanitary equipment, procedures, or products). Findings: During a review of Resident 18's admission Record, dated 12/10/2025, the admission Record indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to honor a resident right by not obtaining a signed informed consent (a process where a person willingly agrees to a treatment) by the resident and/or resident representative prior to the administration of the influenza vaccine, in accordance with facility policy and resident rights requirements, for one of three residents (Resident 31). This failure placed Resident 31 at risk for receiving medical treatment without consent, violation of resident autonomy (the ability to make your own free, independent choices) and decision-making rights. Findings: During a review of Resident 31's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (progressive disease that makes it hard to breathe), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), and dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and show documentation that an Advanced Directive (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) was discussed with the residents and/or responsible parties and written information was provided for two out of 21 sampled residents (Resident 16, and 54). These deficient practices violated the residents' right to be fully informed of the option to formulate their advance directives and had the potential to cause conflict with the residents' wishes regarding alternatives in the provision of health care and end of life decisions. Findings:A. During a review of Resident 16's admission Record, the admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Mixed Receptive-Expressive Language Disorder, (a condition affecting both understanding (receptive) and using (expressive)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that assessment entries on the Minimum Data Set (MDS)-a resident assessment tool) accurately reflected the residents' status at the time of assessment for two of six sampled residents (Resident 25). The facility failed to: 1.Ensure Resident 25 had a documented diagnosis of depression (a serious mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness and loss of interest in activities affecting daily life) when Lexapro (Escitalopram-a prescription medication used to treat depression and anxiety) was administered.This failure resulted in an inaccurate representation of Resident 25's condition during the MDS assessment period and had the potential to impact on the quality and appropriateness of care provided to Resident 25.Findings:During a review of Resident 25's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease(a progressive disease of the nervous system…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the care plan intervention for monitoring signs and symptoms of psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thoughts and emotions are so affected that contact with reality is lost ) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 25) related to the use of Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication prescribed to treat mental health conditions) by failing to: 1.Document behaviors associated with the use of Seroquel as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to prevent staff from determining whether Seroquel was effective in managing Resident 25's psychotic symptoms.Findings:During a review of Resident 25's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease(a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), delirium(a serious disturbance in a person's mental abilities that results in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 18's order for lidocaine patch (a medication in patch form used to treat pain) was implemented according to manufacturer specifications and professional standards of practice. The facility failed to:1.Ensure the lidocaine patch applied to Resident 18's left knee was labeled with the date of application on the day it was applied.2.Ensure the lidocaine patch was removed after 12 hours of application, as required by manufacturer instructions.This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse consequences such as local site reactions including skin irritation, redness, burning, and itching.Findings:During a review of Resident 18's admission Record (a document containing demographic and diagnostic information), the admission Record indicated Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pain in left knee and bilateral (affecting both sides) primary osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of six sampled residents (Resident 22) received respiratory care (specialized healthcare focused on the treatment, management, and prevention of respiratory disorders) consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to: 1.Ensure Resident 22's nasal cannula (a small plastic tube that fits into the nostrils to provide supplemental oxygen) was labeled and dated. 2.Ensure the prescribed amount of oxygen ordered by the physician was administered to Resident 22. This failure had the potential to place Resident 22 at risk for respiratory infection (an infection affecting the respiratory tract, including the nose, throat, and lungs, caused by viruses or bacteria) and respiratory distress (a condition where the body struggles to breathe effectively). Findings:During a review of Resident 22's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff possessed the necessary knowledge and skill set (a collection of abilities, knowledge, personal traits, and expertise developed to perform tasks) for two of seven nursing staff. The facility failed to: 1.Complete and document a performance review for Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1.2. To follow its policy and procedure titled cardiopulmonary resuscitation ([CPR] an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when breathing or heartbeat stops) dated 6/2025 which indicated for staff to maintain current CPR certification through a provider whose training includes hands-on practice and in-person skills assessment, and specifically stated that online-only certification was not acceptable. These failures had the potential to place residents at risk of not receiving care in a safe and competent manner. The facility could not determine if LVN 1's job performance was adequate and safe to provide resident care, and whether CNA 4 could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure performance evaluations were completed at least once every 12 months for three of five Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs). This failure had the potential to prevent identification of areas for improvement or weaknesses in the delivery of care and services to residents by CNAs, which could result in unsafe or inadequate care.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/11/2025 at 8:15 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the employee files for CNA 3, CNA 4, and CNA 6 were reviewed. The DSD stated that CNA 4 began employment on 3/29/2022 and did not have a performance review for 2025. CNA 3, who started on 8/23/2021, also had no performance review for 2025. CNA 6, who started on 10/12/2022, did not have a performance review for 2025. The DSD stated that failure to conduct performance reviews for CNAs can lead to improper resident care because their performance was not assessed. The DSD stated performance reviews should be conducted to ensure CNAs were proficient in providing care to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment, monitoring, and services for one of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 3) with diagnosis of depression (a mood disorder causing persistent sadness and loss of interest, affecting feelings and thoughts in a person). This deficient practice had the potential to result in suicidal ideation (means thinking about, considering, or planning suicide) and impairment or decline in the resident's mental, physical condition, functional abilities, and psychosocial status.Findings:During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (a document containing demographic and diagnostic information), dated 12/11/2025, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but not limited to recurrent major depressive disorder (common and serious mood disorder characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and loss of interest or pleasure in most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for medications were complete and accurate per facility policy for two out five sampled residents (resident 11 and 18). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident 18's order for lidocaine patch (a medication in the form of a patch used to treat inflammation and pain) clearly indicated number of patches (dose) to be applied, per facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Physician Orders, dated 5/2007. 2. Ensure Resident 11's order for diclofenac sodium (a medication used to treat inflammation and pain) external gel had a dose, frequency and location for its use, per facility's P&P titled, Physician Orders, dated 5/2007. These deficient practices increased the risk for inappropriate treatments and medication and adverse effects such as local site reactions (skin irritation, redness, burning, and itching). Findings:1. During a review of Resident 18's admission Record (a document containing demographic and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:1. Ensure Resident 18's lidocaine patch (a medication in the form of a patch used to treat inflammation and pain) applied to Resident 18's left knee was labeled with the date of application on the day it was applied affecting one of five residents observed for medication administration.2. Ensure Resident 38's Fluticasone-Salmeterol (a medication delivered through a device in the form of inhalation powder, used to treat breathing problems ) inhaler was removed from Station A and B Medication Cart 1 after being discontinued, and labeled with an open date in accordance with manufacturer's specifications and facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled PH 1 Medication Administration, undated, affecting one of two medication carts reviewed (Station A B and Medication Cart 1).These deficient practices placed Residents 18 and 38 at risk for adverse events, including local site reactions such as skin irritation, redness, burning, and itching, as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff were competent and able to safely perform assigned job duties, including understanding and accurately following meal tickets (a card for residents' meals) and food service instructions, for two of two dietary staff (Dietary Aide #1 and #2). These failures placed residents at risk for receiving incorrect diets, aspiration (choking), allergic reactions, poor nutritional intake, and compromised resident safety. Findings:During an observation on 12/10/2025 at 12:07 p.m. in the kitchen, Dietary Aide (DA) 2 was observed participating in the tray line (is an assembly-line system in the kitchen where staff quickly prepare and assemble individual resident meal trays) assembly. Dietary Aide 2 appeared to pause prior to assembling trays. DA 2 did not verbally communicate with other staff during the observation regarding clarification of diet orders.During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/10/2025 at 2:15 p.m. with the Dietary Aide (1) and the Dietary Supervisor (DS), DA 1 stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's food preference for one of three sampled residents (Resident 54) by serving beef, despite the resident's stated dislike for it. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 54's dining experience by providing food that did not align with the resident's preferences.Findings:During a review of Resident 54's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 54 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus(DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), congestive heart failure (CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling) and iron deficiency anemia( condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells due to lack of iron [crucial mineral needed to make hemoglobin which carries oxygen from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA, nursing aide program that helps residents maintain any progress made after therapy intervention to maintain their function) splinting (rigid material or apparatus used to support and immobilize a broken bone or impaired joint) recommendations and interventions were accurately documented for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 65) in the Occupational Therapy (OT, profession that provides services to increase and/or maintain a person's capability to participate in everyday life activities) Evaluation, RNA care plan, and RNA flowsheets (daily record of RNA services provided for each month). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact the provision of necessary care and services, cause miscommunication and confusion among staff, cause a decline in range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint), and result in the inappropriate type of splint being placed on Resident 65's left arm potentially leading to pain, discomfort, skin breakdown (tissue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent and involve the resident representative (an individual chosen by the resident to act on their behalf in decision-making and to access medical, social, or other personal information) prior to administering the influenza vaccine for one of three sampled residents (Resident 31). Resident 31 influenza vaccine was administered after the resident representative had declined the vaccine.This failure placed Resident 31 at risk for receiving medical treatment without informed consent, violation of resident rights, adverse reactions or side effects, loss of trust between the facility and the resident's representative, legal and regulatory noncompliance.Findings: During a review of Resident 31's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-progressive disease that makes it hard to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to resolve a grievance indicating a delayed call light response time for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 3).This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 3 to have anxiety (extreme worry).Findings:During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage).During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated 5/28/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 3 had mild cognitive impairment (memory and thinking problems), and had the ability to understand and be understood by others. The MDS indicated Resident 3 required substantial assistance (helper does more than half the effort) from staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to manage pain for one out of three residents (Resident 2), when Resident 2 informed the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 she had left arm and hand pain. This deficient practice had the potential to cause Resident 2's pain to worsen, become uncontrolled, create discomfort, and cause fear of receiving treatment/services due to anticipated pain. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (CVA - stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) and left side hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body). During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS – a resident assessment tool) dated 3/7/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 2 had severe cognitive (ability to think and reason) impairment and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, showering/bathing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a contact precaution sign indicating the personal protective equipment (PPE – clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) that needed to be worn prior to visitors entering the room was posted for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 6) who tested positive for clostridium difficile (C. Diff - a highly contagious bacteria that causes severe diarrhea). This deficient practice had the potential to spread C. diff to other residents, visitors, and staff. Findings: During a review of Resident 6 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation (a medical visit or series of visits after a limb amputation to focus on healing, recovery, and rehabilitation) and type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-11 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an effective pest control program to prevent the infestation of gnats (fruit fly: flying, winged flies) by failing to: 1. Maintain a sanity environment for the residents' shared refrigerator in the dining room. 2. Prevent gnats from flying in Resident 1's room during lunch time. 3. Place UV fly traps throughout the facility and have working UV fly traps in Resident 5's room. 4. Maintain a sanitary environment in the storage room in the kitchen. These deficient practices have the potential to have flies in the food while having lunch and can affect residents that has open wounds prone to infection. Findings: During an observation on 3/11/2025 at 12:05p.m. in shared residents' refrigerator, there were 11 small black gnats with three (3) walking at the bottom of the refrigerator. The refrigerator had a lot of containers that appears to be brought from home with no date or room number, yogurts with the resident's name but no date, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 20 sampled residents (Resident 22, 24 and 13) had a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR-a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) assessment done when diagnosed with a mental illness prior to admission. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 22, 24 and 13 not receiving the necessary services and appropriate psychiatric level of treatment and evaluation in the facility. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 22's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder(a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest),paraplegia (loss of movement and/or sensation, to some degree, of the legs) and acute transverse myelitis of central nervous system( brief but intense inflammation of the spinal cord which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 12) Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) was accurately documented to reflect Resident 12 hearing status. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 12's plan of care and delivery of necessary care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness) and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that can cause severe symptoms that affect a person's feelings, thoughts, and daily activities). During a review of Resident 12's MDS, the MDS indicated Resident 12 has adequate (normal) hearing. During a review of Resident 12's Care Plan titled, Resident 12 had a communication problem related to hard of hearing bilateral ear initiated on 1/30/2024, the Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for one of three residents (Resident 51) who received anti-coagulant therapy (a medication that prevents or treats blood clots in the heart and blood vessels). This failure had the potential to result in complications from the use of anti-coagulant therapy including bruising and bleeding. Findings: During a review of Resident 51's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including venous thrombosis (a condition where a blood clot forms in a vein and blocks blood flow) and embolism (blood clots in the veins) and renal dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly). During a review of Resident 51's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool) dated 10/17/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 51 had moderate cognitive (ability to think, understand, learn, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 163) was helped with activities of daily living (ADL- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves) when Resident 163 requested to have a shower. This failure resulted in Resident 163 feeling abandoned and neglected. Findings: During a review of Resident 163's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 163 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur (hip breaks between the bumpy parts at the top of the thigh bone), history of falling, polymyalgia rheumatica (inflammatory disorder that causes muscle pain and stiffness especially in the shoulders and hips) and presence of left artificial knee joint. During a review of Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 10/29/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 163 had an intact cognition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 32) received necessary care and services by failing to: 1.Follow up and ensure venous and arterial doppler (imaging test that uses sound waves test and help diagnose problems that affect the flow of blood) was done in a timely manner as ordered by the physician on 10/28/2024. 2. Monitor and assess the size of hematoma on Resident 32's left leg. This failure had the potential to cause delays in diagnosis, which could lead to delays in appropriate treatment for Resident 32. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including laceration of popliteal artery of the left leg( cut or tear of popliteal artery which is the main blood vessel that supplies blood for the lower leg and knee area), displaced bicondylar fracture of left tibia ( severe injury that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 12) received access to hearing services. This failure resulted in Resident 12 having trouble hearing properly. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness) and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that can cause severe symptoms that affect a person's feelings, thoughts, and daily activities). During a review of Resident 12's MDS, the MDS indicated Resident 12 has adequate (normal) hearing. During a review of Resident 12's Care Plan titled, Resident 12 had a communication problem related to hard of hearing bilateral ear initiated on 1/30/2024, the Care Plan interventions for Resident 12 included validate message by repeating aloud and use touch, facial expression, tone, and body language to enhance communication. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate safety precautions to residents at risk for fall for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 40). Facility failed to ensure: a. Resident 40, who was on fall risk precaution with landing pads placed on the side of the bed had no bedside table on top of the landing pads. This failure had the potential for injury when Residents 40 would fall out of bed and hit their head on the bedside table placed on top of the landing pads. Findings: During a review of Resident 40's admission Record, the admission Record, indicated Resident 40 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including transient ischemic attack (TIA is a short period of symptoms similar to those of a stroke [(damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply)]) , cardiac pacemaker ( a small, battery-powered device that's surgically implanted in the chest or abdomen to regulate the heart's rhythm and rate) , dementia (a progressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure employee files were reviewed and kept up to date to ensure an at the time of hire and annual competency skill (a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics in performing that an individual need to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully),Tuberculosis ( TB-lung disease) testing, performance evaluation, annual health examinations and background checks were completed for seven employees. The facility failed to: 1.Ensure DSD, Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) 1, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, LVN 4, LVN 5, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 5, and CNA 6 had a Tuberculosis (TB- a lung disease) test, (a skin test to check if you have been infected with Tuberculosis) upon hire and annually. 2.Ensure DSD, LVN 3, LVN 4, LVN 5, CNA 5, and CNA 6 had a skills competency checklist at the time of hire and annually. 3. Ensure DSD, LVN 3, LVN 4, LVN 5, CNA 5, and CNA 6 had annual performance evaluation. 4.Ensure health examinations were completed upon hire and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY b. During a review of Resident 32's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including laceration of popliteal artery of the left leg( cut or tear of popliteal artery which is the main blood vessel that supplies blood for the lower leg and knee area), displaced bicondylar fracture of left tibia ( severe injury that occurs when both upper and lower parts of shinbone are broken and displaced from their normal position), and heart failure (heart does not pump enough blood to meet body's needs). During a review of Resident 32's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 9/19/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 32 had moderately impaired cognitive skills (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember) and required partial/moderate assistance (helper does less than half the effort) with toileting hygiene, bathing, and lower body dressing. During a review of Resident 32's Physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of six sampled residents (Resident 11 and Resident 22) were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 11 was provided with non- pharmacological interventions (intervention that does not primarily use medicine) before administering as needed (prn) psychotropic medication. b. Ensure Resident 22's psychotropic medications were reevaluated for appropriateness of medication. These failures placed Resident 11 and Resident 22 at risk for using psychotropic medicines for excessive duration and developing adverse effects from the medicines. Findings: During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 11 was admitted on the facility on 9/17/2024 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder (a serious mood disorder that affects how a person feels, thinks, and acts), cellulitis (skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication cart was locked and secure and not left unattended during administration of resident's medication. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for accidental ingestion of non-prescribed medicines and unauthorized access of the medication cart from anyone in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation of medication administration and interview on 10/31/2024, at 8:17 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1), LVN 1 did not lock the cart when he performed handwashing in another room and left the medication cart unattended. Observed medication cart was not locked when LVN 1 entered a room to administer medications to a resident. LVN 1 stated he failed to lock the medication cart after preparation of medication and before administering the medication to residents. During an interview on 11/1/2024, at 3:42 p.m., with Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS 1), RNS 1 stated medication cart should be locked when unattended to prevent other residents to have access to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures for two of 10 sampled residents (Resident 17 and 168) by failing to: a.Ensure Resident 17's nasal cannula (a device used to deliver oxygen to a resident) was changed after seven days per facility's policy and procedure. b.Ensure Resident 168's nasal cannula was dated and labeled upon admission. These failures had the potential to result in the transmission of infectious microorganisms and increase the risk of respiratory infection for Residents 17 and 168. Findings: a.During a review of Resident 17's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure (difficult to breathe on your own) and atrial fibrillation (irregular and often rapid heart rate). During a review of Resident 17's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool), the MDS indicated Resident 17 had severe cognitive (ability to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an Infection Preventionist (IP) on staff with required qualifications and completed specialized training in Infection Control and Prevention. This deficient practice had the potential for failure to monitor and implement Infection Control and Prevention in the facility. Findings: During a record review of the Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN) certification, dated 6/5/2018, the IPN certification indicated it was a 16-hour Boot Camp for Long Term Care Facilities certificate. During an interview on 11/1/2024 at 9:20 a.m., the IPN stated she did not have the correct certificate by the Center of Disease Control (CDC) for 19.75 hours. IPN stated she was unaware she needed a specific infection prevention certificate. During an interview on 11/1/2024 at 4:17 p.m., the DON stated the IPN did not have the correct IP certificate. No policy and procedure regarding what certificate was required for IP. During a review of facility's Infection Preventionist Job Description dated 12/17/202, the Infection Preventionist Job Description…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in a sanitary manner to prevent foodborne illness (also called food poisoning caused by eating contaminated food or eating food not kept at appropriate temperatures) by failing to: 1) Label canned foods, corn bread powder, butter, meat products, and vegetables with opened date and received date. 2) Ensure damp cloth used by [NAME] 1 did not repeatedly touched the food inside the plate. 3) Ensure [NAME] 2 who handed utensils back and forth to [NAME] 1 wore gloves. 4) Ensure [NAME] 3 wore gloves while reaching inside the food cart and touches the plate inside the food cart. These deficient practices had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization for residents residing in the facility. Findings: During a facility kitchen tour observation on 10/16/2023 at 8:06 am. found soup base beef style with no open date, corn bread powder with no open date, creamy wheat with no open date,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 41) were treated with dignity and respect by failing to ensure Resident 41 had a dignity bag (restores the dignity of [catheterized-a procedure used to drain the bladder and collect urine, through a flexible tube patient by concealing urinary drainage bags from public view) for his indwelling catheter ([foley catheter] plastic or rubber tube that is inserted into the bladder to drain the urine) drainage bag (collects urine). This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 41's self-esteem, self-worth, and feeling embarrassed. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including infection (occurs when a [microorganism- an organism that is so small it can only be viewed under a microscope] enters a person's body and causes harm) of the right shoulder, urinary tract infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure call lights was within reach for two of three sampled residents (Residents 33 and 39). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay and inability for Resdeint 33 and Resident 39 to obtain necessary care and services. Findings: During a record review of Resident's 39 admission Record (face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension ( high blood pressure) , diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the body fails to metabolize (process) glucose (sugar) correctly ), and hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat particles (lipids) in the blood). During a review of the Resident 39's Minimum Data Sheet ([MDS]- a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 8/7/23, indicated, Resident 39 has clear speech, sometimes able to make self-understood or sometimes able to understand others. Resident 39 has a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 41) received right arm sling (to ease pain, support healing and to protect arm from further injury) This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 41 at risk for further range of motion (ROM - the extent of movement of a joint) decline, contracture (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) and dehiscence (a surgery complication where the incision (surgical wound) reopens). Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including infection of the right shoulder, urinary tract infection (infection in any part of the urinary system), and neuropathic bladder (lack of bladder control). During a review of Resident 41's History and Physical (H/P), dated 10/9/23, the H/P indicated, Resident 41 had the capacity to understand and make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure it was free of not greater than 5 percent (%) or below medication error rate, as evidenced by eleven medications errors out of 42 opportunities for error, which yield a 26.19% medication error rate. This deficient practice resulted in a 26.19 percent (%) medication error rate for Resident 6. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including aphasia ( inability to speak ) dysphagia ( inability to swallow ) and hypertension ( high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 6's history and physical (H&P) report dated 2/2/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 6 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 8/7/2023 indicated Resident 6's requires extensive assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Cross Reference F759 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 6) was free from significant medication errors by failing to ensure crushed medications were not mixed before medication administration according to facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice had the potential to affect medication efficacy, compatibility and can have drug interactions for Resident 6. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including aphasia ( inability to speak ) dysphagia ( inability to swallow ) and hypertension ( high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 6's history and physical (H&P) report dated 2/2/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 6 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication cart and treatment cart were locked when unattended by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 3). This deficient practice had the potential for unauthorized access to medications and medical supplies by residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/16/2023 at 12:18 pm with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, observed medication cart C-D was left unlocked. LVN 3 stated medication cart should be locked when left unattended to prevent potential unauthorized access by resident, staff, and visitors. During an observation on 10/16/2023 at 12:23 pm, observed treatment cart (storage for medical supplies used to treat wounds) was left unlocked in the hallway next to the nursing station. During an interview on 10/18/2023 at 9:11 am with LVN 4, stated residents can steal medical supplies that can be harmful to residents when ingested. During an interview on 10/18/2023 at 10:08 am with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, stated anyone can access the medication cart when left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure heparin lock (heplock- locking device on an intravenous catheter [ placed in a vein ] to administer medication) was covered. This deficient practice has the potential to contaminate the intravenous catheter, and risk of infection. Findings: During a record review of Resident 102's admission Record (Face sheet), the Face sheet indicated Resident 102 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), pneumonia (an infection that affects one or both lungs). During a record review of Resident 102's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardize assessment and care-screening tool, dated 9/01/2023, the MDS indicated, Resident 102's needs total assistance on dressing and toilet use and needs extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call system was functional including the audible sounds to alert the staff for one of two sampled Residents (Resident 11). This deficient practice had a potential in a delay in meeting care or services for Resident's 11. Findings: During a review of Resident 11's admission record (face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease that block air flow and make it difficult to breathe), unspecified osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease, in which the tissues in the joint break down over time), muscle weakness (decreased strength in the muscle). During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool) dated 7/29/2023, indicated Resident 11cognitive (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) skills for daily decisions were severely impaired. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 12 residents' rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, and 15) met the requirements of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) for each resident. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space, provision for resident care and personal property, and privacy for the residents.Findings:During a facility tour and observation on 12/10/2025 at 11:15 am, the residents residing in these rooms were observed with sufficient space to move around freely within the room, and the nursing staff had enough space to provide care. There were no adverse effects noted to the residents' privacy, health, and safety, which could have been compromised by the size of the rooms. During an observation 12/10/2025 at 11:15 p.m., rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15, and 17 did not meet the requirement of 80 sq. ft. per resident.During a review of Client Accommodations Analysis form, provided by the facility's Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the Client Accommodation Analysis indicated Rooms 1, 2,3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 12 residents rooms met the requirements of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) for each resident. Rooms 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, and 15, housed two residents per room and room [ROOM NUMBER] and 17 housed one resident per room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in an inadequate provision of safe nursing care, and privacy for the residents. Findings: During an observation 11/1/2024 at 2:04 p.m., rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15, and 17 did not meet the requirement of 80 square feet (sq ft-unit of measurement) per residents. During a review of Client Accommodations Analysis form, provided by the facility's Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the Client Accommodation Analysis indicated Rooms 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, and 15, occupied by two residents each, ranged in total square feet measurement between 68.75 square feet to 77.6 square feet per resident and rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] occupied by one residents ranged in total square feet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 12 of 34 resident rooms (Rooms # 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15, and 17) met the requirements of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) for each resident. This deficient practice had the potential to result in an inadequate provision of safe nursing care, and privacy for the residents. Findings: During a record review on 10/16/23 at 9:44 a.m., the Administrator (ADM) provided a copy of the facilities 2023 annual request for waiver letter. A review of the letter indicated there are 12 resident room with less than the required 80 sq. ft. per resident, and the rooms are monitored to ensure that furnishing and equipment in the room does not hamper provision of needed care and there is sufficient space to meet the needs of both residents. ADM stated the facility would be requesting a room waiver for 2024. According to the Client Accommodations Analysis form, dated 10/16/23, the facility had 12 rooms that measured less than 80 sq. ft. per resident.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRETZ, DERECK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2023 |
| TARNG, WILLIAM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2023 |
| WILLITS, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/01/2023 |
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 11/08/2022 |
| KEETCH, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2011 |
| KIM, JESSE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 02/01/2023 |
| SATO, AMI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/09/2024 |
| TWOMAGNETS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/01/2023 |
| PORT, BARRY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/29/2025 |
| ENSIGN SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/02/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055262. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.