The Grove Care and Wellness

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

70.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 98 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 38 beds and averages 35.6 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.73 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted to address a grievance filed regarding care provided, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident A), when Resident A notified the facility staff that the Registered Nurse smelled alcohol while providing care to her.This failure resulted in Resident A's grievance not being investigated in a prompt manner and the resident was fearful of the RN caring for her. In addition, this failure had the potential for other residents' psychosocial well-being to be affected.Findings:On March 11, 2026, at 8:45 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility regarding a facility reported incident.On March 11, 2026, at 12:40 p.m., a review of Resident A's medical record was conducted. Resident A was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included osteomyelitis (bacterial infection of the bone causing swelling, fever, tissue damage), bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the blood in an immunocompromised…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions (additional infection control measures used for patients with suspected or confirmed highly transmissible pathogens) were implemented according to the facility's policy and procedure, for two of three residents reviewed (Residents A and B).This failure had the potential for Residents A and B to be exposed to further infections.Findings:On March 11, 2026, at 8:45 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted for the investigation of infection prevention and control.On March 11, 2026, at 9:20 a.m., an interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP) was conducted. The IP stated there are several residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - Infection control measures used in nursing homes to minimize the spread of infections during high contact care-requiring staff to wear gowns and gloves) and a few residents on contact isolation (mandatory use of gloves and gowns upon room entry and removed before…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a plan of care (POC) with specific goals and objectives to address the injury, for one of four sampled residents (Resident 4) when Resident 4's rib fracture was identified. This failure had the potential for Resident 4 not to receive appropriate interventions tailored to her needs. Findings: On March 3, 2025, at 8:51 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a facility reported incident related to an injury of unknown origin concerns. On March 3, 2025, Resident 4 ' s record was reviewed. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) and osteoporosis (bone disease prone to fracture). A review of Resident 4 ' s History and Physical, dated February 7, 2025, indicated Resident 4 was mentally incapable of understanding. A review of Resident 4's Order Summary Report, dated February 11, 2025, indicated, .Alendronate Oral Tablet 70 MG (milligrams-unit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food practices were provided, when: 1. Lettuce and stalks of celery were found in the walk-in refrigerator, open to air; 2. A small container of elbow macaroni was not dated or labeled; and 3. One tin container was placed on top of another tin container touching cut up watermelon. These failures had the potential to cause growth of harmful bacteria in food served to a medically compensated population. Findings: 1. On January 27, 2025, at 9:47 a.m., during the initial kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager (DM), small heads of lettuce and stalks of celery were found in unsealed plastic bags observed to be open to air stored in the walk-in refrigerator. On January 27, 2025, at 10:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM). The DM stated the lettuce and celery were in the walk-in refrigerator exposed to air and should not be exposed to air. A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Storing Produce, dated 2023, indicated, .When storing vegetables that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed and implemented to address a personal monitoring device used to measure blood glucose levels, for one of 15 residents (Resident 14). This failure had the potential for staff to not be aware of Resident 14 care needs and provide appropriate treatment related to the blood sugar monitoring device. Findings: On January 28, 2025, at 3:20 p.m., Resident 14 was observed at the nurse's station trying to get the attention of the nursing staff due to his Dexcom (brand name of a blood glucose monitoring device inserted under the skin) monitor showing an increase in blood sugar. On January 29, 2025, at 4:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 14. Resident 14 stated he would show the staff his personal blood glucose monitor when his blood sugar would increase or decrease. Resident 14 stated his blood sugar increased and licensed nursing staff would not give insulin (medication that helps regulate blood sugar…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observaton, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and treatment was provided according to the physicians orders and plan of care, for two of 15 residents (Residents 14 and 286) when: 1. For Resident 14 and 286, the blood sugar levels were outside of the parameters and; 2. For Resident 14, the blood pressure (B/P - force exerted by blood against the walls of the arteries) was not monitored prior to administering the medication to treat high blood pressure. These failures had the potential for a delay in care and treatment and could cause a decline in the residents overall health condition. Findings: 1a. On January 28, 2025, at 3:20 p.m., Resident 14 was observed at the nurses station trying to get the attention of the nursing staff due to his Dexcom (brand name of a blood glucose monitoring device inserted under the skin) monitor showing an increase in blood sugar. On January 29, 2025, at 4:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 14. Resident 14 stated he would show…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure provision of pharmacy services met the needs of the residents, when Resident 18 was missing documentation for the administration of a controlled substance (CS - those with high potential for abuse and addiction) medications, during the medication cart inspection. The CS medication was signed out of the Controlled Medication Count Sheet (an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications) but not documented on the Medication Administration Records (MAR) to indicate it was administered to the resident. Additionally, the CS medication was wasted (not administered to the resident and discarded) without two licensed nurses' documentation on the count sheet according to the facility's policy for Resident 18. These failures resulted in inaccurate accountability of CS medications, which had the potential for misuse or diversion. Findings: On January 27, 2025, Resident 18's record was reviewed. Resident 18 had a physician's order, dated November 16, 2024, for hydrocodone-acetaminophen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported irregularities during the monthly medication regimen review (MRR), for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 10), when Resident 10 received sertraline (brand name for Zoloft, medicatuion used to treat depression) without an appropriate indication and/or clinical justification for its use. This failure had the potential for medications not being optimized for best possible health outcome, and unnecessary or prolonged use of medications which could lead to medication adverse effects for the residents. Finding: On January 29, 2025, a review of Resident 10's clinical record indicated Resident 10 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and recently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which includes major depressive disorder (depression). A review of Resident 10's medical record indicated she had received sertraline prescribed for depression on December 7,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 10), was free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications when Resident 10 was administered sertraline (brand name Zoloft, used to treat depression) without an appropriate indication and/or clinical justification for its use. This failure resulted in unnecessary medications for Resident 10, which increased the potential for medication interactions, adverse reactions, and unidentified risks associated with the use of sertraline that included but not limited to sexual dysfunction, diarrhea, nausea, and seizures. Finding: On january 29, 225, a review of Resident 10's clinical record indicated she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and recently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder (depression). A review of Resident 10's medical record indicated she had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed when the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed not to perform hand hygiene prior to and after passing out lunch trays. This failure had the potential for staff to spread infection to residents who are already medically compromised. Findings: On January 29, 2025, at 11:48 a.m., CNA 1 was observed passing out lunch trays without washing or sanitizing his hands. On January 29, 2025, at 12:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with CNA 1. CNA 1 stated he should have washed and sanitized his hands prior to touching the lunch tray and after placing the tray with the resident. On January 30, 2025, at 10:23 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP stated during meal distribution prior to touching plates, staff should wash or sanitize their hands before and after handling each tray and after every three residents, the staff should wash their hands. A review of the policy and procedure titled Hand Hygiene, 2023, indicated, .use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $714K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA