Arrowhead Springs Healthcare
1335 N. Waterman Ave., San Bernardino, CA 92404 · For profit - Corporation · 119 certified beds · (909) 885-0268 Medicare & Medicaid certified
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.6% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.2% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.7% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.4% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.6% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.1% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.4% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.1% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.2% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.2% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.30 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.98 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 53.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.3%CMS range 29.9–57.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 6.6–14.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 53.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 70.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 91.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 89.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.2–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.37 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 109.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.90 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-04 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents, in writing, of services available and the charges for those services, including charges for items and services not covered by Medicare or Medicaid for three of four sampled residents (Resident 120, 121, and 122) when Resident 120, 121, and 122 did not receive written notification of their estimated out of pocket cost on the required Skill Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage form (a form a facility gives a resident to let them know Medicare may stop paying for their stay or certain services).These failures had the potential to prevent residents from receiving the information necessary to understand their potential financial liability and make informed decisions regarding continued care.During a record review of Resident 122's Skill Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) form, dated December 2, 2025, the SNF ABN form was missing the required cost-per-day amount for continued stay in the facility.During a record review of Resident 120's SNF ABN form,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-04 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR - a federally mandated program that requires all individuals seeking admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility to be screened to ensure individuals who are identified to have a significant mental illness (SMI), intellectual or developmental disability (I/DD)) are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) for two of five sampled residents (Resident 17 and 76) for PASARR when: 1. Resident 17 did not have his diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a mental health condition triggered by experiencing or witnessing a terrifying, shocking, or dangerous event) included in the PASARR assessment used to admit the resident into the skilled nursing facility.2. Resident 76 did not have his diagnoses of paranoid schizophrenia (a bran condition where a person loses touch with reality and becomes trapped in a world of intense fear, false beliefs, and imaginary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate treatment to three Residents (Resident 2, 13 and 24) fed by enteral means. The three Residents did not receive the correct volume of enteral feeding (liquid nutrition through a soft tube that goes directly into your stomach or small intestine) ordered by the physician when:Resident 4 did not receive the physician ordered volume of enteral feeding (75 mL (milliliter)/hr. (hour), or 300 mL) during the observation period of 6:00 am to 10:00 am on June 1, 2026. The Licensed Vocation Nurse (LVN-1) also did not know how much of the enteral feeding was infused during the prior shift for the dose period starting at 2:00 pm on June 1, 2026, until the start of her shift at 7:00 am which is necessary to ensure that Resident 4 received the full dose of 1500 mL. Resident 13 did not receive the physician ordered volume of enteral feeding during the dose period of June 1, 2026, at 1:00 pm to June 2, 2026, at 10:00 am, when the resident only received 800 mL (milliliters, a unit of volume) of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed and authorized to self - administered medications of 13 residents (Resident 47) reviewed for medication administration when three medications were found at the Resident 47's bedside within reach and readily accessible, without a completed self-administration of medications assessment (a clinical evaluation to determine if a resident can safely store, manage, and take their own medications independently or with minimal supervision), interdisciplinary team (IDT - a group of medical support professionals who work together to create and execute a patient - centered care plan) review, or physician authorization. This failure had the potential to result in improper medication use, medication errors and cause harm to Resident 47 due to unsupervised access to prescribed medications.During a review of Resident 47's admission Record (contains demographic and clinical information), it indicated Resident 47 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a facility assessment and care planning process used by nursing home staff as required by the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS]) assessments were accurately coded for one (1) of 26 residents (Resident 107) when Resident 107's assessment did not reflect the resident's status, care, and services in active diagnoses under Section I (Active Diagnosis section).This failure had the potential to cause inaccuracies in identifying Resident 107's care and support needs.During a review of Resident 107's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), the admission Record, indicated Resident 107 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (kidneys can no longer filter waste and excess fluid from the blood), anxiety disorder (mental health condition characterized by excessive, persistent fear or worry that interferes with daily life) and anemia (body lacks enough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR - a federally mandated program that requires all individuals seeking admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility to be screened to ensure individuals who are identified to have a significant mental illness (SMI), intellectual or developmental disability (I/DD)) was completed for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) for PASARR when Resident 1 stayed more than 30 days in the facility.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1's condition not being identified prior to admission and the need for treatments and services not being accurately assessed, placing Resident 1 at risk for unmet needs.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), the admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included right lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (blood clot in the deep vein of right leg),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent with three medication errors of 36 observed opportunities, affecting two on thirteenth observed residents (Resident 123 and 45), resulting in an overall error rate of 8.3 percent when:1. Resident 123 was not given Omeprazole (a medication used to reduce stomach acid) as ordered.This failure had the potential for Resident 123 to have increased stomach discomfort or increased stomach acid. 2. Resident 45 received Vitamin D3 (a vitamin that helps with strong bones, muscles, and the immune health) 5000 IU (International Units- unit of measurement) instead of Vitamin D3 1000 units (unit of measure), as prescribed by the physician. This failure had the potential to cause Vitamin D toxicity (abnormally high levels of calcium in the blood, which can result in nausea, vomiting, altered mental status, cardiac abnormalities, and kidney damage). 3. Resident 45 had an order to receive Vitamin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and secure for one of 13 resident (Resident 47), when Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol inhaler (a medication used to help control and prevent symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]), Nystatin cream (a medication used to treat fungal skin infections) and Diclofenac Sodium Topical gel (a medication used to relieve pain and inflammation) were found unattended and readily accessible on Resident 47's bedside table. This failure had the potential to result in improper medication use, medication errors, adverse drug reactions by Resident 47 or others. During a review of Resident 47's admission Record (contains demographic and clinical information), it indicated Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a long term lung disease that makes it hard to breath because the airways are damaged or blocked), gastroesophageal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed effective infection control practices for three (3) of 107 residents (Residents 60, 54, and 52) when one licensed vocational nurse (LVN 3) did not clean and disinfect a reusable medication tray (used to prepare and transport medication to residents) between medication administration.This failure had the potential for cross contamination (the transfer of harmful bacteria), which could expose residents to harmful organisms (capable of causing infection, illness, or adverse health effects) and lead to preventable healthcare associated infections (HAIs- infections that residents acquire while receiving care in a healthcare facility) for 107 highly vulnerable residents.During an observation on June 3, 2026, at 5:37 AM, in Resident 60's room, with LVN 3, after LVN 3 gave medication to Resident 60. LVN 3 then placed a used medication cup, a used spoon with applesauce on it, and a used water cup back onto the medication tray and returned it to the medication cart. LVN 3 discarded the used cups…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure proper disposal of garbage when one of two lids in the outside recycling receptacles was not closed and overflowing with trash. This failure had the potential to attract pests. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on April 22, 2025, at 7:45 AM, with the Registered Dietician (RD), in the garbage storage area, located outside the facility, there were three garbage containers. One container (the recycling container- a large container for holding or transporting waste or items for recycling) was not closed and it was overflowing with open cardboard boxes. The RD stated the recycling container should be close and should not be overflowing. During an interview on April 24, 2025, at 7:55 AM, with the Administrator (Admin), the Admin verbalized his expectation is for staff to break down boxes and flatten out boxes for recycling receptacle to close, because of potential to attract pests. The Admin further stated, I know we should have the recycling bins closed. During a review, of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 20 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, supplies were kept in good condition for one out of twenty-five residents (Resident 54) when Resident 54's mattress was found peeled, discolored, and in disrepair. This failure had the potential for Resident 54 to experience physical discomfort, sleep disturbances, and increased risk of infections or skin breakdown. Findings: During an observation on April 21,2025, at 10:21 AM, in Resident 54's room, Resident 54 was awake lying in bed, half of the mattress at the foot of the bed, was peeled and discolored. During a concurrent observation and interview on April 21, 2025, at 04:50 PM, with the Administrator (ADMIN), in Resident 54's room, the ADMIN stated, Oh, we need to change this mattress right now. The ADMIN stated, Resident 54 has [name of the insurance company] insurance and Admin was going to contact them (the insurance company) to replace the mattress. During a review of Resident 54's admission Record (contains medical and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans (a care plan that includes all the health problems, preferences and goals) for two of three residents (Residents 22 and 17) that were reviewed for care plans needs when: 1. Resident 22 did not have a care plan developed to address ongoing podiatry needs for long fingernails and toenails since admission, on October 4, 2024. 2. Resident 17 did not have a care plan developed for intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy with Ceftazidime Intravenous Solution ( a strong antibiotic given through a vein (IV) that helps kill bacteria caused infection). These failures had the potential to result in unmet medical needs for Residents 22 and 17, and can cause delay in treatment and lack of coordinated care, placing Resident 22 and 17 at risk for complications. Findings: 1. During a Review of Resident 22's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 22 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide proper hygiene and grooming care (help with keeping the body clean and neat including cutting nails, brushing hair, shaving and general personal appearance) for one of eight residents (Resident 22) when Resident 22 had long thickened and yellow toenails curling over the tips on both feet, as well as long, untrimmed fingernails on both hands. This failure had the potential for Resident 22 to experience pain, skin breakdown, fungal infection (infection caused by germs [fungus] that grow on the skin or nails, in toenails, it can make them thick, yellow brittle and sometimes painful), refusal of mobility and negatively impacted Resident 22's dignity and quality of life. Findings: During a Review of Resident 22's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included difficulty walking (trouble walking which may be due to weakness,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the bilateral side rails (an adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed) were in place for one of eight residents (Resident 58) reviewed for safety when a physician order to install bilateral side rails was not carried out for 37 days (March 17, 2025). This failure had the potential to place Resident 58 at risk for falls or injury. Findings: During a Review of Resident 58's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included kidney transplant status (a transplanted kidney), congestive heart failure (a chronic condition where the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should) and pancytopenia (a condition where all types of blood cells are low, reducing the body's ability to fight infection, carry oxygen and control bleeding, making any injury more serious). During a concurrent observation and interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain infection control practices for one of eight residents (Resident 74) when Resident 74's oxygen tubing (is a small, flexible plastic tube that connects an oxygen source [like a machine or a tank]) was found on the floor under the bed. This failure had the potential to spread infectious disease (disease cause by bacteria, viruses, fungi or parasite) to Resident 74. Findings: During a review of Resident 74's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of acute chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure (the heart can't pump blood well, so fluid can back up into the lungs, causing trouble breathing), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (the heart has episodes of irregular beating) and muscle weakness (generalized) (when muscles are very weak and can make it hard to breathe deeply.) During a concurrent observation and interview on April 21,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent avoidable accidents for one of three sampled residents Resident1 (R1) when: 1. Resident 1 fell out of bed, sent to acute hospital for open laceration to right side of head. 2. No floor mats at bedside as recommended. This failure contributed to Resident 1 sustaining an open injury to forehead and being set out to hospital for further evaluation and received staples. Findings: During review of Residents 1's admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include: urinary tract infection (urine infection), syncope and collapse (fainting, loss of consciousness), hypertension (high blood pressure), history of falling. During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 1's Medical Record with Infection Prevention Nurse (IP), reviewed and verified the following: 1. admission Fall Risk assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow its Activities of Daily Living ADLs policy and procedure for 4 of 10 sampled Residents (Resident's 1,2, 3 and 4) when: 1. Resident 1 used call light to get staff attention for help and assistance and it takes a 1 hour to answer and NOC shift doesn't even come at all. 2. Resident 2 was left soiled for a long period of time on NOC shift. 3. Resident 3 used call light needed assistance due to feelings of low blood sugar and waited 3 hours long to get assistance. 4. Resident 4 needed assistance with ADLS and wait time was well over an hour or closer to shift change. This failure had the potential to cause (Resident 1,2,3, and 4) health and safety to be at risk for skin break down when their care needs were not met. Findings: During interview and Records Reviewed with (Resident 1,2, 3, and 4) indicates as followed: 1. During review of Residents 1's admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that one of three sampled residents, (Resident 1) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, when Resident 1 fell off the bed unto the floor during care by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 2). This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a laceration on her right eyebrow. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' admission Record (general demographics) the document indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included age-related cataract (a condition of blindness), quadriplegia (a condition of loss of movement and feelings in both arms and legs, cerebral palsy (a condition that affects the movements and coordination) and history of falling (July 9, 2023). During an interview on October 22, 2024, at 12:15 PM, with the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1), the CNA 1 stated, I usually call another CNA to help me change and turn her because she is not able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their infection prevention and control program when Resident 1, on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - an approach of targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities, designed to reduce transmission of multidrug resistant organisms [MDRO – bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics]), did not have identifiable enhanced barrier precautions signage outside the resident ' s room in accordance with the facilities policy and procedure and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance. This failure had the potential for staff to not identify that Resident 1 was on enhanced barrier precautions and required the use of a gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities which increased Resident 1 ' s risk of either acquisition of or transmission of MDRO ' s. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (contains medical and demographic information) indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure for a thorough admission assessment when a surgical wound did not receive a treatment order on admission causing a delay in treatments for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to place a clinically compromised Resident (Resident 1) health and safety at risk. When the surgical wound assessments and treatments to promote wound healing were started 4 days after admission. Findings: During review of Residents 1's admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include: fracture of T11-T12 vertebra (thoracic spine fracture), diabetes type II (body does not produce enough insulin, or resist insulin), obstructive sleep apnea (airflow blockage during sleep), hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review concurrent interview and record review of Resident 1's Medical Record with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow Its policy and procedure to provide Activities of Daily Living Services (ADLS) and ensure call lights are answered in timely manner for 4 of 5 sampled residents. (Resident's 2,3,4, and 5). This failure had the potential to place four clinically compromised Residents (Resident 2,3,4 and 5) health and safety at risk. When residents were left soiled, and their hygiene needs were not met. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include, urinary tract infection (urine infection), multiple sclerosis (damage to nerves in brain and spinal cord), difficulty walking, hypertension (high blood pressure). During interview and observation on August 22, 2023, at 10:34 AM, with Resident 2, resident 2 states, The longest I have been in soiled bed is 7 hours on the night shifts, it's so uncomfortable. Some of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-05-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to do maintenance on the stove in the kitchen on an annual basis per their policy , when two of the burners were not lit because the gas lines were clogged with grease/corrosion and five out of eight dials that function to turn on the burners and adjust gas flow were missing. This failure had the potential to cause a grease fire and put staff and 91 residents at risk. Findings: 1. During an observation and concurrent interview with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) on May 23, 2022,at 10:10 AM, the six burner industrial stove was missing five plastic knobs that were used to turn on the burners and adjust the gas flow. The left front and rear middle pilot burners were not lit, the remaining four burners were lit with a low flame. According to the DSS, the cook grabs a plastic knob from another location and uses it on the missing knobs to turn on and adjust the gas for the burners. She stated that she was not sure why two of the burners were not lit. She stated that the cook uses a lighter and the knob to turn…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to discuss and provide information on advanced directives (a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, should the person be unable to communicate with the doctor) for one of six sampled residents reviewed for advanced directives (Residents 70) when the Physician's Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) for one resident (Resident 70) was not initiated upon admission. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 70's values and desires related to end-of-life care not to be carried out. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 70's face sheet (a document that gives a summary of resident's information), undated, indicated an admission date of [DATE], with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (airway obstruction from the lungs), dysphasia (difficulty speaking), chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (not able to exchange oxygen due to not having enough oxygen in blood). A review of Resident 70's MDS, Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for two of 11 sampled residents (Resident 8 and 52), when range of motion exercises and splints were not provided as per physician orders, by the restorative nursing assistants (RNA- certified nursing assistants specially trained to do range of motion and splints) 1. For Resident 8, Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA-a certified nursing assistance with training on range of motion and the application of splints) services were not provided to resident as ordered by the physician, for the month of May 2022. 2. For Resident 52, Restorative Nursing Assistant services were not provided to the resident, as ordered by the physician, for the month of May 2022. This failure had the potential to decrease in the range of motion and could have resulted in worsening of contractures (joint stiffness) and mobility for Residents 8 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status when Resident 53's enteral feeding (nutrition taken through a tube that goes directly to the stomach or small intestine) was not assessed correctly by the Registered Dietitian after re-admission to the facility from a hospital stay. This failure resulted in the Resident losing 3% of his body weight in one month after re-admission. Unintentional weight loss in the elderly population is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Findings: During a review of Resident 53's admission Record, indicated Resident 53 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dysphagia ( difficulty swallowing ) and hemiplegia ( a condition, caused by a brain injury , that results in varying degrees of weakness, stiffness and lack of control in one side of the body) . During an observation on May 24, 2022 at 3:30 PM, Reident 53 was in bed and appeared to be sleeping, he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an enteral nutrition container (container with liquid nutritional formula administered to a resident through a feeding tube inserted directly into the stomach) for one resident (Resident 53) was labeled with nurse initials and start time (time the feeding was started) as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure. This failure had the potential for the bottle to exceed the manufacturer's prescribed hang-time (the time a feeding is safe to use after opened), and for Resident 53 to not receive the prescribed amount of nutritional calories resulting in weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 53's clinical record, the admission Record [contains demographic and medical information], indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included heart failure, chronic respiratory failure, and diabetes mellitus (a chronic metabolic disease which results in elevated blood sugar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff identified an irregularity during medication administration and monthly drug regimen review for one of one residents (Resident 72) reviewed for anticoagulants (blood thinners) when it was not identified that the resident had a physician's order for heparin (an anticoagulant) to be administered intramuscularly (into the muscle tissue) instead of subcutaneously (into fatty tissue). Nursing staff administered the medication subcutaneously and did not identify the discrepancy, nor seek clarification from the physician regarding the route of administration. This failure had the potential for the resident to receive heparin intramuscularly which may have resulted in the formation of a hematoma (abnormal collection of blood outside of a blood vessel). Findings: During a review of Resident 72's clinical record, the admission Record [contains demographic and medical information], indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the monthly medication review was implemented per the facility's policy and procedure for one of six residents (Resident 72) reviewed for medication regimen review when the pharmacist failed to identify Resident 72's physician's order for heparin (an anticoagulant or blood thinner) was to be administered intramuscularly (into the muscle tissue) every 8 hours. This failure had the potential for the resident to receive heparin intramuscularly which may have resulted in the formation of a hematoma (abnormal collection of blood outside of a blood vessel). Findings: During a review of Resident 72's clinical record, the admission Record [contains demographic and medical information], indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hemorrhagic disorder due to extrinsic circulating anticoagulants (bleeding disorder due to the use of anticoagulants), dependence on respirator (ventilator - a machine which aids…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician's Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (a written medical order from a physician, nurse practitioner or physician assistant that specifies the type of medical treatment to provide an individual during serious illness) was signed by a physician, nurse practitioner, or physician's assistant, for one of six sampled residents investigated for advanced directives (Resident 52). This failure resulted in information and decisions determined on the POLST to not be an official physician's order which had the potential for the needs and desires regarding end-of-life medical treatment to not be carried out in accordance with the resident's request. Findings: During a review of Resident 34's clinical record, the admission Record [contains demographic and medical information], indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (bleeding into the brain in the absence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their infection control program to prevent the spread of infectious microorganisms when three staff members (Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 [LVN 4], Admissions Coordinator [AC], and Certified Nursing Assistant 2 [CNA 2]) did not follow precautions when they were observed to enter the room of a resident (Resident 83) on contact precautions (precautions intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents which are spread by direct or indirect contact with the patient or the patient's environment) for Candida Auris (a fungus capable of causing severe infection) and all three staff members did not have on a gown. This failure had the potential for the contamination of the environment and the spread of Candida Auris to the 88 vulnerable residents living within the facility who did not already have Candida Auris infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 83's clinical record, the admission Record [contains demographic and medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 02/01/2022 |
| KEETCH, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2014 |
| PORT, BARRY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2019 |
| WILLITS, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/29/2021 |
| MANGOBA, LUTHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2022 |
| SANCHEZ GONZALEZ, YAMALIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2022 |
| ALVARADO HEALTH HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2022 |
| ENSIGN SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2022 |
| STANDARD BEARER HEALTHCARE OP, LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2022 |
| THE ENSIGN GROUP INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055708. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.