Carmel Mountain Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center
11895 Avenue Of Industry, San Diego, CA 92128 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (858) 673-0101 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.9% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.2% | 1.2% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.5% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.9% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.3% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.8% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.4% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.3% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.9% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.2% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.84 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.82 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
70.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 293 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 67.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.67 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 70.5%CMS range 66.0–74.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.9%CMS range 6.5–11.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 67.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 67.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 45.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 4.1–8.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 114.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.96 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.19 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement fall preventative measures recommended by the Fall IDT (Interdisciplinary Team- a group of individuals with different areas of expertise) for one of three residents (1) who was assessed as a high fall risk with a history of multiple falls. As a result, Resident 1 experienced additional falls on 3/2/26 which resulted in hospitalization and surgery for a fractured (broken) hip. Findings:A review of the undated admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included repeated falls prior to admission at the facility and displaced fractures of the fifth and sixth cervical vertebrae (bones that form the spinal column), and displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur (a broken hip). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool), dated 1/7/26, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update and implement the care plan for one of three residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls.As a result, Resident 1 continued to sustain additional falls and was placed at risk for injury.Findings:Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the skilled nursing facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included repeated falls, displaced fractures of the fifth and sixth cervical vertebrae (bones that form the spinal column) , and displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur (a broken hip).During a record review, the facility's Fall Risk Evaluation dated 1/3/26 indicated Resident 1 was at high risk for falls.During a review of Resident 1's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT- a group of professionals with different areas of expertise) progress note dated 1/5/26 at 13:41 P.M. the note indicated, IDT fall committee met today to discuss unwitnessed falls that happened on 1/2/26 at 1458 and 1/3/26 at 1412 with no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate monitoring following a change in condition for one of three residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls.As a result, Resident 1 had the potential to have injuries related to the fall to go unnoticed, and to receive delayed care from staff.According to the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included repeated falls, displaced fractures of the fifth and sixth cervical vertebrae (bones that form the spinal column), and displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur (a broken hip).A record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool) dated 1/7/26 indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a tool to assess cognition, or thinking skills) of 7, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated Resident 1 had two or more falls prior to admission to the facility. Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to infection prevention protocols in 3 out of 3 rooms on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (an infection control measure requiring staff to wear gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care) when: A foley catheter bag was observed on the floor.A staff member was observed handling soiled linen and trash in the hallway.A staff member did not perform hand hygiene before entering and exiting a room of a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precaution. These failures had the potential to spread bacteria within vulnerable residents of the subacute unit, and to staff and visitors.Findings:1.) During a record review on 1/22/26, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included malfunction of tracheostomy (a surgically created opening in the neck) and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (nerve damage which causes problems with urination).During a record review on 1/22/26, Resident 1's physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to care and services for two of two sampled residents reviewed for Resident Rights (Resident 1 and Resident 2), when: 1.The facility did not provide Resident 1 condom catheters (can be used by men to collect urine) and he had to purchase/ order for himself.2. Resident 2 did not have access to television channels for activity. These failures had the potential not to meet Resident 1's needs and affect Resident 2's mental health that may affect their quality of life.Findings: 1.Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (the nerves that carry messages back and forth between the bladder, the spinal cord and brain don't work the way they should, common example dribbling urine or incontinence), per the facility's admission Record. Resident 1's minimum data set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 9/4/25, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary measures were met when a used urinal was on top of a resident's bedside table with food and cleaning supplies (Resident 2), for one of four residents reviewed for infection control. This failure had the potential for contamination of food and cleaning supplies and spread of infection to Resident 2 and his visitors.Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's admission Record. Resident 2's minimum data set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 9/11/25, Resident 2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, ability to recall) score of 13/15, which indicated Resident 2's cognition was intact. On 9/16/25 at 2:35 P.M., an observation of Resident 2 in his room and an interview was conducted with Resident 2 and a family member (FM) at bedside. Resident 2 laid in bed and a bedside table was on his right side of the bed. On top of the bedside table was a used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medications on time to 50 of 113 residents during a planned power outage.This failure had the potential to affect the health and well-being of the residents.Findings:A consumer complaint was filed with the California Department of Public Health alleging that on 8/10/25, Resident 1 had not received medications as prescribed.An interview was conducted with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 8/11/25 at 1:50 P.M. The ADON stated the facility had experienced a planned power outage on 8/10/25, and nursing staff was unable to use the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) to provide medications to all residents. The ADON stated 50 of the 113 residents who resided in the facility on 8/10/25 received their scheduled morning medications after the power came back on, approximately 10 A.M. The ADON stated she had spoken to Resident 1's family members, who wanted to remove the resident from the facility due to the medication problems.An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure temperature was addressed and notified physician for one of two residents in a timely manner. These failures resulted in a delay of assessment and treatment for Resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], according to the facility admission Record. On 9/4/25 at 2:57 P.M., a concurrent interview and record review were conducted with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) and Licensed Nurse (LN) 1. LN 1 stated normal body temperature within 97 to 99 degrees Fahrenheit (F). According to the History and Physical Examination (H&P) by the physician on 12/10/24 and with diagnoses to include hypothermia (body drops below 95 degrees Fahrenheit (F). According to the facility change of condition evaluation dated 12/14/24 at 12 P.M., .Resident was noted to have low temperature @ 9.30am[sic] w/ readings at 92 and was rechecked at around 11am with readings at 90.2, resident was noted shivering and skin is cold.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a facility plan for a power outage and accurately report the unusual occurrence to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH).As a result, the facility was not prepared for a planned power outage, and 50 of 111 residents did not receive their medications in a timely manner.Cross reference: F755 Findings:A consumer complaint was filed with CDPH regarding a resident not receiving medications in a timely manner on 8/11/25 (Resident 1).A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) was filed with CDPH regarding a planned power outage which occurred on 8/11/25. The FRI indicated protocols were implemented, including the use of paper Medication Administration Records (MARs) for resident medication administration. According to the FRI, .No untoward incidents were noted.A concurrent interview and record review was conducted with the Director of Maintenance (DM) on 8/12/25 at 1:03 P.M. The DM stated the power outage on 8/11/25 was a planned power outage for a cable upgrade. The DM stated he had been notified by the power…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1b. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dependence on a ventilator (a machine used to support or replace the breathing of a person who is ill), per the facility admission Record. A record review was conducted. Per the 3/4/25 MDS, Resident 17 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS indicated Resident 17 required full staff assist for toileting, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, and turning in bed. An interview was conducted with Resident 17 on 4/21/25 at 11:01 A.M. Resident 17 stated when she used her call light to get help, the CNAs come in to help her, At their convenience. Resident 17 stated she had anxiety, and waiting too long for help made her anxiety worse. An interview was conducted with the DON on 4/24/25 at 12:46 P.M. Per the DON, her expectation was for all staff to answer call lights as soon as possible. The DON stated it was important to answer call lights promptly to prevent skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, safe and comfortable homelike environment when: 1. An observation of 11 of 24 resident areas in one nursing unit had dirty wall-mounted fans in their rooms, and 2. An observation of 13 of 24 resident areas in one nursing unit had broken furniture, holes in the wall, and/or scraped paint areas in their rooms. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' health and well-being. Findings: On 4/21/25 starting at 8 A.M., observations of all resident rooms on one nursing unit was conducted. Nine of 11 residents were unable to speak and had no visitors present. An observation of 11 of 11 residents who were on ventilators (a mechanical device that helped a person breathe when they cannot do so on their own) was conducted. 1. Each of the 24 resident areas had a 12- inch fan mounted to the wall directly across from, and facing the resident's head of bed. An observation of 11 of the fans had a black coating of what appeared to be fine dirt and residue adhering to each fan blade. 2a. Ten of 24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain proper food sanitation procedures when expired food was identified in the kitchen refrigerators, and in the nursing unit refrigerator. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness to the residents who received food from the kitchen and/or nursing unit refrigerator. Findings: A concurrent kitchen tour and interview with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) was conducted on 4/21/25 at 8:23 A.M. In the walk-in refrigerator, a bag containing approximately eight ounces of shredded parmesan cheese was found to have a Use By Date of 4/17/25. A reach-in refrigerator contained six small plastic containers of peaches, with a Use By Date of 4/20/25. The DSS stated both foods should have been disposed of on the Use By Date. The DSS stated expired food had the potential to cause foodborne illness to the residents. A concurrent observation of nursing unit refrigerators and an interview with a Nurse Manager (NM 1) was conducted on 4/24/25 at 10:45 A.M. Three containers of expired yogurt was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee (QAA-facility group that monitors concerning trends in a facility) failed to identify and include in the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement plan (QAPI-plan developed by QAA to help improve conditions in the facility) deficient trends found by surveyors during the recertification survey concerning call light response and the lack of homelike environment for the residents. This failure had the potential for the facility to overlook trends in resident care that might have affected residents' health and quality of life. Cross Reference: F558, F584 Findings: On 4/24/25 at 2:18 P.M., a concurrent interview with the Administrators (ADM 1 and ADM 2), the Director of Nursing (DON) and a review of QAPI program was conducted. The ADMs stated that the main areas that the QAPI team were monitoring were falls, pressure ulcer reduction, weights and urinary tract infection prevention. During the recertification survey, deficient trends in call light response and the lack of homelike…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not follow infection control practices when: 1) Staff did not don (put on) and doff (remove) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE- gown, gloves, mask) or perform hand hygiene when providing care to a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, use of PPE when providing high contact resident care to reduce the spread of bacteria), and, 2) Two ice scoops were not stored in a sanitary manner. As a result, there was the potential for cross contamination, affecting the health of residents. Findings: 1a. According to the admission Record, Resident 316 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fractures (broken bones) of the vertebra (spinal column), and muscle weakness. During an observation on 4/21/25 at 7:54 A.M., a sign was observed outside Resident 316's room which indicated EBP. A blue sticker was observed next to Resident 316's name, outside the room. A container filled with PPE was observed outside the room. On 4/21/25 at 7:54…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers consistently for one of one sampled resident (Resident 24), reviewed for choices related to personal care. As a result, Resident 214's preferences and choices were not honored and respected. Findings: Resident 24 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, per the facility's admission Record. Resident 24's history and physical, dated 3/31/25, indicated Resident 24 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A record review was conducted of Resident 24. Resident 24's minimum data set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 4/1/25, indicated Resident 24's brief interview for mental status (BIMS, ability to recall) score was 15/15 (a score of 13 to 15 suggests the patient is cognitively [process of acquiring knowledge and understanding] intact). On 4/21/25 at 9:39 A.M., an observation and an interview of Resident 24 was conducted in her room. Resident 24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement individual care plans for two of five resident's (Resident 214 and Resident 220), reviewed for care plans. This failure resulted in Resident 214 experiencing pain, when a care plan was not developed for constipation and Resident 220's plan of care was not implemented as ordered by the physician, to wear bilateral foam boots (both feet), to protect and prevent future skin injuries to the heels. Findings: 1. Resident 214 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included orthopedic aftercare related to cervical disc disorder (neck region), per the facility's admission Record. An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 214 on 4/22/25 at 8:41 A.M., as he laid in bed. Resident 214 was rubbing his abdomen, stating he felt discomfort and bloating. Resident 214 stated he had not had a bowel movement in several days and they gave him a suppository last night, but nothing has happened yet. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 97), reviewed for closed record, when: 1. Staff failed to follow physician's order related to intravenous (IV, within a vein) antibiotics (anti-infective medications) therapy for Resident 97, and, 2. Consistently provide Resident 97's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC, a long, thin tube inserted through a vein in the arm) care. These failures placed Resident 97 at risk for delayed healing and PICC line associated complications. Findings: Resident 97 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection), and urinary tract infection (UTI), per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 97's clinical record was conducted. Resident 97's physician's order dated 4/1/25, indicated, Resident 97 was to receive two antibiotic medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order related to pressure ulcer (a localized injury to the skin and underlying tissue caused by prolong pressure), treatment and prevention for one of four residents (Resident 43), reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure had the potential for worsening or additional pressure ulcers to occur. Findings: Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cellulitis (a bacterial infection of the skin and the underlying tissues) of the lower extremities, along with sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection), per the facility's admission Record. An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 43 on 4/21/25 at 8:25 A.M., as she sat in bed. Resident 43 had a padded green boot on her left foot and both heels were resting directly on the mattress. Resident 43 stated she got a wound on her left heel, after her legs swelled up from an infection.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision during toileting for a resident identified as high risk for falls. In addition a gait belt (a safety device used by caregivers to assist residents with mobility issues), was not utilized during transferring the resident from bed to a bedside commode for one of three residents (Resident 220), reviewed for accidents. These failures could potentially contributed to Resident 220 having an unwitnessed fall in the room. Findings: Resident 220 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included displaced fracture of the right tibia (lower leg bone) and right patella (knee), per the facility's admission Record. An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 220 on 4/21/25 at 9:23 A.M. Resident 220 was sitting up in bed with a sling and partial splint on her left forearm. Resident 220 stated she fell four days ago, while using the bedside commode, resulting in a fractured left wrist. A bedside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its Bowel and Bladder protocol for two of two residents (Resident 214 and 104) reviewed for Bowel and Bladder when: 1. The constipation bowel regimen was not implemented after three days of no bowel movement for Resident 214; and, 2. The urine output (UO) was not consistently documented for Resident 104, who had a urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to aid in urine flow). This failure had the potential for increased and unnecessary pain for Resident 214, along with no consistent monitoring of urine output for Resident 104. Findings: 1. Resident 214 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included orthopedic aftercare related to cervical (spine in the neck) disc disorder, per the facility's admission Record. An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 214 on 4/22/25 at 8:41 A.M., as he laid in bed. Resident 214 was rubbing his abdomen, stating he felt discomfort and bloating. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis (the process of cleaning the blood through a machine) access site was properly cared for one of one resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident 87). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 87's dialysis access to clot. Findings: Resident 87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included End Stage Renal Disease (kidney failure), per the admission Record. On 4/21/25 at 10:34 A.M., an observation and an interview were conducted of Resident 87 in her room. Resident 87 was up in her wheelchair. Resident 87 stated she went for dialysis Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays and showed her right arm dialysis access site. On 4/22/25 at 2:37 P.M., an observation of Resident 87 was conducted. Resident 87 arrived at the facility from the dialysis via wheelchair and noted a dressing to right upper dialysis access site. On 4/23/25 at 8:09 A.M., an observation and an interview were conducted of Resident 87…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 17) received: 1. A physician's explanation for renewal of a PRN (as needed) anti-anxiety medication, 2. Review and monitoring of the behaviors which required the use of an anti-anxiety medication, and, 3. A scheduled Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR, a required attempt to reduce dosage of a medication) for the anti-anxiety medication. These failures had the potential for Resident 17 to receive unnecessary medications, or more medication than necessary to treat anxiety. Findings: Resident 17 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include anxiety disorder (an intense, excessive and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations), per the facility admission Record. On 4/21/25 at 11:01 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 17. Resident 17 stated she was on a medication to treat anxiety, but she did not know if she received it regularly, and she often felt worried about getting staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately document the correct extremity involved in their weekly wound evaluation summary for one of four residents (Resident 43), reviewed for wound care. This failure had the potential for confusing and misleading information in Resident 43's clinical record. Findings: Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cellulitis (a bacterial infection of the skin and the underlying tissues), in the lower extremities along with sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection), per the facility's admission Record. An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 43 on 4/21/25 at 8:25 A.M., as she sat in bed. Resident 43 had a padded green boot on her left foot and both heels were resting directly on the mattress. Resident 43 stated she got a wound on her left heel, after her legs swelled up from an infection. Resident 43's clinical record was reviewed on 4/22/25.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physicians' plan of care related to skin and wound treatments for three of three residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) reviewed for Comprehensive Care Plans. This failure had the potential for Resident 1, 2, and 3's skin and wound injuries to worsen. Findings: 1. Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis which included Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS-a progressive nervous system disease that affects the brain and spinal cord), resulting in functional quadriplegia (unable to move all four limbs), per the facility's admission Record. Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed on 12/17/24: According to the facility's admission Note, dated 10/25/24, Resident 1 was readmitted from the hospital with documented skin injuries to the right and left scapula (shoulder blades), and right buttocks, all described as deep tissue injuries (a type of pressure ulcer where the underlying soft tissues, like muscles and fat,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility fall evaluation tool did not accurately represent the fall risk status of three residents, (Residents 1, 2 and 3), sampled for admission fall risk evaluation. Per the Director of Nursing (DON), the fall evaluation tool did not allow nursing staff to include all medications and medical diagnoses that could increase fall risk, which resulted in artificially low fall risk scores. This failure had the potential to contribute to one or more actual falls for each sampled resident, and a right hip fracture (a break or crack in a bone) for resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included difficulty in walking and generalized muscle weakness, major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that can be treated with antidepressant medication that can increase fall risk), cardiac murmur (a sound caused by improper closing of valves in the heart, a condition that can cause lightheadedness), chronic kidney disease (a condition in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to create an admission fall risk care plan for one resident, (Residents 1), sampled for baseline care plan. This failure had the potential outcome of contribution to two falls for Resident 1 who sustained a fracture (a break or crack in a bone) of her right hip. Findings: On 9/23/24 the State Agency (SA) received a facility reported incident which indicated, Resident fell in her room, sent to hospital, admitted and a diagnosis of right femur (fracture) declared. Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included difficulty in walking and generalized muscle weakness, major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that can be treated with antidepressant medication that can increase fall risk), cardiac murmur (a sound caused by improper closing of valves in the heart, a condition that can cause lightheadedness), chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys cannot fully eliminate waste from the blood, which can cause confusion), anemia (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, one resident (Resident 1) was served a food item inconsistent with the prescribed therapeutic diet. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 1 difficulty swallowing safely. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (a medical condition that causes partial or total paralysis of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (a serious condition that causes brain tissue to die) affecting left side, generalized muscle weakness, and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty). On 8/22/24 the State Agency (SA) received a complaint that indicated Resident 1 was served a bowl of soup that was not pureed per the ordered therapeutic diet. On 8/28/24 a telephone interview was conducted with the Ombudsman (an official who investigates concerns and facilitates solutions) prior to facility entrance. The Ombudsman stated on 8/21/24 Resident 1 had an order for pureed (blenderized) food but was served chicken soup…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its COVID-19 mitigation plan when: 1. front desk staff did not request people who entered the facility to wear a mask during a COVID-19 outbreak (at least three confirmed positive cases within a seven day period). 2. Infection Preventionist (IP) 1 allowed a visitor into the COVID-19 isolation area without an n95 mask (a highly protective respiratory mask). 3. Floor staff did not stop unmasked visitors to ask them to wear a mask while inside the facility. 4. Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 had a mask under her chin when she entered a patient room. 5. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and a Receptionist were unmasked in a hallway. 6. All but two kitchen staff were unmasked in the kitchen during lunch preparation. These failures had the potential to infect vulnerable residents with COVID-19. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (a medical condition that causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident, Resident 3, sampled for falls. This failure had the actual outcome of Resident 3 suffering two fractured ribs. Findings: On 8/26/2019 Resident 3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (total or partial paralysis of one side of the body that results from disease of, or injury to the nervous system) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain which causes part of the brain to die), epilepsy (disorder of the brain characterized by repeated seizures), tremor (a medical condition that includes shaking movement of part of the body), history of falling, fracture of rib on right side 12/29/2015, right clavicle fracture (a bone that connects the breastbone to the shoulder blades, also called collarbone) 4/12/2016, shoulder dislocation (a separation of two bones where they meet at a joint)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff followed policy and procedure when: 1) opened food items were not labeled and dated properly 2) opened food item was not discarded by use by date and 3) a. knife had food debris on it and b. a kitchen staff did not change gloves after washing a used blender during food preparation. As a result, there was a potential for foodborne illness (illness caused by food contaminated by microorganisms and toxin) and cross-contamination (physical transfer of harmful bacteria). Findings: 1) On 5/7/24 at 7:50 A.M., a tour of the facility's kitchen was conducted. Inside a refrigerator, a plastic container with leftover pineapple slices was noted. There was no date on the container when the pineapple was first opened/prepared or needed to be used by. On 5/7/24 at 8:04 A.M., an observation of a shelf with bread in it was conducted. An opened package of bread buns and an opened package of hot dog rolls had no dates when they were opened or needed to be used by. One of the hot dog rolls was noted to have a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to proper infection control practices when : 1. a resident's urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to aide in urine flow) bag and dignity bag (a bag used to cover and conceal contents inside), were laying on the floor on 1 of two residents (Resident 81). 2. the staff did not perform hand hygiene (HH- washing hands with soap and water or use of hand sanitizer to kill microorganisms a) after exit from resident's room and b) before entry to residents' room. 3. the staff did not perform HH in between glove changes a) during wound care and b) after glove removal and before putting on new glove. 4. the staff did not remove personal protective equipment (PPE) before exiting a resident's room on an Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- precautions to prevent spread of infection that require the use of PPE during high-contact resident care activities); placed the basket of phlebotomy (blood draw) supplies on the clean…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for one out of six residents (Resident 320) when Resident 320's urine collection bag was not concealed from public view. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the resident's psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 320's clinical record was reviewed and indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with muscle weakness, urinary retention (inability to eliminate urine completely) per the facility's admission Record. During an observation conducted on 5/7/24 at 11:08 A.M. in the facility hallway, Resident 320's urine bag was observed hanging on the wheelchair. The collection bag was not covered, and the content was visible. A concurrent observation and interview were conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 31 on 5/7/24 at 11:15 A.M. LN 31 stated, Resident 320's urine collection bag was seen by the people passing in the hallway and further stated, the urine collection bag must be covered to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their policies on medication self-administration (resident takes medication without staff assistance) were implemented for one of one sampled resident (Resident 101) when the facility did not determine the resident was clinically appropriate and safe to self-administer a medication. This failure had the potential to result in unsafe medication administration. Findings: Review of Resident 101's clinical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypertension (elevated blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (DM - elevated blood sugar) per the facility's admission Record. An observation and interview were conducted with Resident 101's son on 5/7/24 at 10:05 A.M. inside Resident 101's room. A tube of triamcinolone cream (medication to treat skin condition) was on the bedside table. Resident 101's son stated he applied the medication to Resident 101's itching skin. A joint interview and record review were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to address resident's needs for one of 29 sampled residents (Resident 316) when the resident's call light (device used to call staff's assistance) was not placed within reach. This failure had the potential for Resident 316's needs not being met. Findings: Review of Resident 316's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with displaced fracture (break in the bone) of right femur (leg), history of falling, difficultly in walking. Resident 316's minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 5/9/24 indicated Resident 316 was cognitively intact. During an observation and interview on 5/7/24 at 9:20 A.M. inside Resident 316's room. Resident 316's call light was observed dangling on the headboard. Resident 316 stated I need help and I can't reach my button. Resident 316's son was inside the room and pressed the button for Resident 316. An interview was conducted on 5/7/24 at 11:05 A.M. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 32. LN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a written medical order from a healthcare provider based on patient preferences on the type of medical treatment they want to receive during serious illness) was signed by the physician in a timely manner for one of two sampled residents reviewed for advance directives (Resident 62). As a result, the POLST was not valid for a patient who wished to be on Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNR- allow natural death) in case of a serious illness. Findings: Resident 62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart failure per the facility's admission Record. On 5/8/24 a review of records was conducted. The POLST indicated Resident 62 wanted to be DNR. There was no physician signature on the document. On 5/9/24 at 3:50 P.M., an interview with the Social Services Director (SSD) was conducted. The SSD stated for new admission residents, the nurse, physician and social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff protected the confidential information of two of 29 sampled residents (Resident 216 and Resident 215) when the computer monitors were left open and unattended. This failure had the potential for the residents' personal and confidential medical information to be visible to unauthorized persons. Findings: Resident 216 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses which included fracture of sacrum (a large triangular bone at the bottom of the spine) per the facility's admission Record. Resident 215 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses which included right supracondylar and humeral fracture (right shoulder fracture) per the facility's admission Record. An observation was conducted on 5/7/24 at 9:56 A.M. on the Medication Cart #1's computer monitor in the hallway outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The unattended computer monitor was observed open with Resident 216's medical record. An interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment was provided for two of 29 sampled residents (Resident 50 and Resident 216) when the bedrails' black foam was ripped, torn and in disrepair condition. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's comfort, well-being, and quality of life. Findings: 1. Resident 216 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture of sacrum (a large triangular bone at the bottom of the spine) per the facility's admission Record. An observation was conducted on 5/7/24 at 10 A.M. in the room of Resident 216. Resident 216's bedrail was observed with a wrapped black foam on both sides of the bed. Both the right and left bedrails' black foam had multiple ripped and torn areas. An interview was conducted on 5/7/24 at 10:05 A.M. with Resident 216. Resident 216 stated she does not feel being cared for because her bedrail foam coverings were broken. An interview was conducted on 5/7/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were developed for: 1) psychotropic (drugs that affect mood, behavior, thoughts and perception) medications and 2) code status (an instruction on what the medical team should do if a resident had a cardiac or respiratory arrest) for two of two sampled residents (Resident 6 and Resident 62): As a result, there was a potential for 1) Resident 6's psychotropic medications were not managed appropriately and 2) Resident 62's code status was not followed. Findings: 1) Resident 6 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder (a type of mood disorder) and anxiety disorder (a type of mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry or fear) per the facility's admission Record. On 5/10/24 a review of records was conducted. The Order Summary Report dated 4/5/24 indicated the physician ordered to administer psychotropic drugs to Resident 6. On 5/10/24 at 3:43 P.M., an interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal care was provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 319) when Resident 319 had white, crusty substance on the inner side of her eyes. This failure had the potential to result in poor personal hygiene and decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 319's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included difficulty in walking, traumatic subdural hemorrhage (injury to the brain) per the facility's admission Record. Resident 319's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated she required maximum assistance with shower/bathing. During an observation on 5/7/24 at 9:35 A.M., inside Resident 319's room, Resident 319's inner eyes were observed with white, crusted substance. A joint observation and interview were conducted with Licensed nurse (LN) 2 on 5/07/24 at 12:05 P.M. LN 2 stated Resident 319 had a white, crusty substance on the inner side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure staff followed physician's orders when : Resident on daily weight was not weighed daily on 1 of 2 residents (Resident 41) These failures had the potential to result in decreased physical and psychosocial well being for the residents. Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories and Chronic Kidney disease Stage 3 per facility's admission Record. On 5/7/24 at 10:34 A.M. a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 41 was conducted in Resident 41's room. Resident 41 was on a wheelchair waiting for his lunch. Resident 41 stated the facility was supposed to weigh him daily to monitor his weight. Resident 41 stated the facility sometimes were not weighing him everyday. On 5/7/24 at 10:49 A.M. , a review of records was conducted. The physician's order dated 1/11/2022 indicated Daily Weights to be completed, everyday shift. On 5/10/24 at 10:05 A.M. an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Restorative Nursing Assistance (RNA- care to improve or maintain functional ability) was conducted per the physician's order for one of two sampled residents reviewed for limited range of motion (Resident 6). As a result, there was a potential for development of further contractures (chronic loss of joint mobility) for Resident 6. Findings: Resident 6 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included contracture of muscle, left upper arm and quadriplegia (paralysis of all four extremities) per the facility's admission Record. On 5/9/24 at 9:49 A.M., an observation of Resident 6 was conducted. Resident 6 was in bed, both upper arms were noted to be contracted. On 5/10/24, a review of records was conducted. The physician order dated 4/5/24 indicated to begin RNA program three times per week for three months on both upper and lower extremities. Resident 6's RNA flowsheet for the month of April 2024 indicated: Week…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure tube feeding (TF-nutrition in liquid form through a tube) was labeled appropriately per the facility's policy for two of three residents reviewed for TF (Resident 6 and Resident 106). As a result, there was a potential the residents may not receive the adequate amount of TF per physician order. Findings: Resident 6 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encounter for attention to gastrostomy (opening in the stomach created surgically) per the facility's admission Record. On 5/9/24 at 9:49 A.M., an observation of Resident 6 in the room was conducted. A TF bag was noted to be dated 5/8/24 and running at 55 milliliters (mls) per hour. There was no time on the TF bag when it was started to be administered to Resident 6. On 5/9/24 at 9:54 A.M., a joint interview and record review with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2 was conducted. The physician order for TF for Resident 6 indicated Resident 6 was to be administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff was able to verbalize the accurate steps in administering a tube feeding (TF - nutrition in liquid form through a tube) for one of three residents (Resident 20). This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 20's health. Findings: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic respiratory (lung) failure, with tracheostomy (an incision in the windpipe made to relieve obstruction to breathing),connected to a ventilator (a device used medically to support the breathing ) per Facility's admission Record. On 5/9/24 at 9:25 A.M., a joint observation, interview and record review with Licensed Nurse (LN) 13 was conducted. Resident 20 was in his room with TF through gastrostomy (an opening into the stomach from the abdominal wall made surgically for introduction of food). The physician order for Resident 20 indicated TF at 50 milliliters (ml) per hour for 20 hours. LN 13…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medication was administered accurately to one of 29 sampled residents (Resident 17) when the Licensed Nurse (LN) administered a medication without properly identifying the resident. This failure had the potential for residents to be administered with wrong medications. Findings: Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diverticulitis (inflammation) of large intestine with perforation (rupture) and abscess (pus) per the facility's admission Record. An observation was conducted during medication administration on 5/10/24 at 8:19 A.M. with LN 14. LN 14 verbalized that she was ready to administer the medication to Resident 17. LN 14 was observed walking to the bedside of Resident 17 with a medication. Resident 17 was observed without a wristband identification (ID). LN 14 did not check for Resident 17's wristband ID and did not ask for Resident 17's identifiers (name and date of birth ). LN 14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications were locked for one of seven medication carts (Medication Cart # 1). This failure had the potential for Medication Cart # 1 to be accessed by unauthorized personnel. Findings: An observation was conducted on 5/7/24 at 9:56 A.M. in the hallway outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. A Medication Cart (#1) was noted to be unlocked and unattended by a Licensed Nurse (LN). A joint observation and interview were conducted on 5/7/24 at 10:03 A.M. with LN 11. LN 11 was observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] with a resident. LN 11 later exited the resident's room and went to Medication Cart # 1. LN 11 stated the medication cart was left unlocked and unattended when she went inside room [ROOM NUMBER]. LN 11 opened the drawers of Medication Cart # 1 without unlocking it with a key. LN 11 stated the key lock button should have been pushed to lock the medication cart. LN 11 stated she should have locked the Medication Cart # 1, when she went…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure fire extinguishers in the kitchen were inspected in a timely manner. As a result, there was a potential the fire extinguishers were not safe to be used. Findings: On 5/7/24 at 7:50 A.M., a tour of the facility's kitchen was conducted. There were three fire extinguishers noted with March 2024 as the last documented inspection date on the tags. On 5/7/24 at 3:48 P.M., an interview with Maintenance Assistant (MA) 1 was conducted. MA 1 stated he did not record the months of April and May 2024 inspection dates of the fire extinguishers on the tags. On 5/9/24 at 9:15 A.M., an interview with MA 1 was conducted. MA 1 stated the fire extinguishers should be checked monthly. On 5/9/24 at 9:56 A.M., an interview with MA 1 was conducted. MA 1 stated it was important to check the fire extinguishers to make sure they work. MA 1 stated when he checked the fire extinguishers, he would write it down on his notebook and rips the page and put it on the boss' computer or desk. MA 1 stated his boss would log it on an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to address resident's needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 7) when Resident 7's call light (device to call staff for help) was not placed within reach. Review of Resident 7's admission diagnoses dated 11/09/21 included gout (severe pain in the joints) and hypertension (increased blood pressure). An observation and interview was conducted on 7/25/23 at 12:45 P.M. inside Resident 7's room. Resident 7 was observed to be frustrated that he was not able to locate his call light device. Resident 7's call light was observed wrapped around his side rail. Resident 7 stated he could not reach his call light. A concurrent observation and interview was conducted on 7/25/23 at 12:46 P.M. with certified nursing assistant 1 (CNA 1) inside Resident 7's room. CNA 1 stated Resident 7's call light was tied around the side rail. CNA 1 further stated the call light should be placed within the resident's reach. On 7/28/23 at 10:15 A.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a patient centered care plan related to PTSD (Post-traumatic stress disorder - a disorder that may occur in people who have experienced or witnessed a traumatic event) for one of 21 residents (Resident 72) reviewed for care plans. This failure had the potential risk of not providing appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to Resident 72. Findings: Resident 72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included PTSD according to Resident 72's Face Sheet. During a record review of Resident 72's History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/31/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 72 had a past medical history of PTSD. During a record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool)) - Section C, dated 4/4/2023, indicated that Resident 72 had short and long-term memory problem, as well as a problem with memory/recall ability and severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. During a record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one of eight residents (Resident 72) reviewed for Trauma Informed Care (TIC - an intervention and organization approach that focuses on how trauma may affect an individual's life and his or her response to behavioral health), received care and services in accordance with professional standards when Resident 72's PTSD (Post-traumatic stress disorder - a disorder that may occur in people who have experienced or witnessed a traumatic event) was not identified and addressed by the healthcare providers. This failure resulted in the facility's inability to identify Resident 72's possible triggers that could result in re-traumatization (the reactivation of trauma symptoms via thoughts, memories, or feelings related to the past traumatic experience). Findings: Resident 72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included PTSD according to Resident 72's Face Sheet. During a record review of the Resident 72's History and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely administer prescriber's ordered medications to one of five sampled residents (Resident 264). This failure had the potential to cause delay and compromise resident's medical health. Findings: Review of Resident 264's Physician's orders indicated she was to receive Bumex (Water pill) 1 mg twice a day and Alphagan (eye drop for elevated eye pressure) 1 drop in both eyes three times a day. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/25/23 at 11:45 A.M. inside Resident 264's room, Resident 264 was observed upset. Resident 264 stated she had not received her scheduled 9 A.M. medications. An interview and record review was conducted on 7/25/23 at 12:05 P.M. with Licensed Nurse (LN 1). LN 1 stated she was late giving Resident 264's scheduled medications for 9 A.M. LN 1 further stated that medications should be given one hour early or one hour late of the scheduled time. During an interview on 7/27/23 at 9:13 A.M. with the Pharmacy Consultant (PC). The PC stated prescribed medications should be given an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 3 sampled residents (Resident 407 and Resident 25) reviewed for psychotropic (a drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior) medication were free from unnecessary use of medication when: 1. Resident 407 did not have behavior monitoring for the four psychotropic medications (psychoactive drugs taken to exert an effect on the chemical makeup of the brain and nervous system). 2. Resident 25's Ativan (medication to treat anxiety, which act on the brain and nerves) ordered to be given as needed, did not have a stop date. This failure had the potential for healthcare providers to not determine the effectiveness of Resident 407's psychotropic medications. In addition, Resident 25 had the potential to be expose to unnecessary side effects of the medications. Findings: 1) A review of Resident 407's admission Record indicated that the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 6.9% when two medication errors occurred out of 29 opportunities during medication administration for one of five residents (Resident 9). These failures resulted in the resident not receiving the full therapeutic effects of the medication. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 9's Physician order dated 3/7/20, indicated Docusate Sodium (DSS, stool softener) 250 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) via Gastric tube (G tube, tube inserted to the abdominal wall) three times a day for bowel management. A med pass observation and interview on 7/26/23 at 9:27 A.M. with licensed nurse (LN 2) inside Resident 9's room. LN 2 took a DSS capsule, placed it in a cup and LN 2 poured water into the cup. LN 2 stated he was going to wait for the capsule to dissolve. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/26/23 at 9:31 A.M. with LN 2, he verified a liquid form of DSS was in the medication cart. He also stated that the liquid medication should have been prepared instead of the capsule. On 7/28/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility failed to discard four expired cans of food of 20 cans reviewed. This failure put residents at risk of consuming spoiled food. Findings: On 7/25/23 at 7:40 A.M., an observation was conducted of the dry food storage room. Four cans of beef ravioli had a use by date of 7/6/23, and there was a sticky note above the cans which directed staff to use by 7/6/23. On 7/25/23 at 8 A.M., an interview was conducted with the Dietary Supervisor (DS). The DS stated, the facility should have removed the expired food, but the person responsible for removing the expired items was on leave, so it was missed. Per the facility's policy titled, Storage of Food and Supplies, dated 2022, .No food will be kept longer than the expiration date on the product .
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/09/2024 |
| KALAFER, MICHAEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/22/2016 |
| MATTHEWS, GLENN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2013 |
| PORT, BARRY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/22/2015 |
| KEETCH, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2011 |
| OH, KATHERINE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/09/2024 |
| SATO, AMI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/09/2024 |
| WILLITS, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2006 |
| CETNA STAFFING INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2006 |
| LINCARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2006 |
| SEVENOAKS CAPITAL ASSOCIATES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2006 |
| CARETRUST GP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2006 |
| CARETRUST REIT INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2006 |
| CM HEALTH HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2006 |
| CTR PARTNERSHIP LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2006 |
| ENSIGN SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2006 |
| THE ENSIGN GROUP INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/30/2006 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555326. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.