Mission Hills Post Acute Care
3680 Reynard Way, San Diego, CA 92103 · For profit - Corporation · 75 certified beds · (619) 297-4484 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.8% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.8% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.6% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.8% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.3% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.7% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
62.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 152 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.78 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 62.1%CMS range 52.5–69.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.9%CMS range 9.9–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 66.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 69.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 64.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 91.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 81.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.9–10.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 69.9 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.52 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutrition interventions were consistently implemented and re-evaluated for effectiveness to prevent an unplanned severe insidious weight loss of 31.9 pounds (22.7%) in six months, for one of seventeen sampled residents (Resident 29). The resident's nutrition status interventions were not re-assessed for effectiveness, and the care plan goals were not updated to reflect the resident's desired weight goal, according to facility policy and standards of practice. This deficient practice led to continued weight loss and the facility's inability to meet the resident's desirable body weight range, which further impaired nutrition and health status. Cross reference 800, 803, 806 and 809 Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of fracture of left femur (upper bone in leg), muscle weakness, hypertension (high blood pressure), and diabetes (high blood sugar). A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to return to the facility following a hospitalization. In addition, the facility failed to offer a bed hold to Resident 1 per facility policy.As a result of this failure, Resident 1 had the potential to not receive continuity of care, prolonged Resident 1's hospital stay unnecessarily, and violated Resident 1's rights to return to the facility. Findings:During a record review, the document titled admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's Disease (a movement disorder that worsens over time), and type 2 Diabetes (a condition where the body cannot effectively use the insulin it makes).According to the MDS (Minimum Data Set- a federally mandated assessment tool), dated 3/23/26, Resident 1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool to assess thinking skills) of 14, which indicated Resident 1 had intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing for the facility when: 1. Payroll data report from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS-government agency overseeing nursing health facilities) indicated quarter one 2025 triggered for Excessively Low Weekend Staffing .October 1- December 31. 2. Residents in the confidential resident council meeting verbalized not having enough staff. This failure in excessively low weekend staffing resulted in not meeting staffing requirements by CMS and had the potential for residents to not receive an appropriate quality of care. Findings: 1. During a review of the facility's PBJ [Payroll Based Journal] Staffing Data Report [staffing and payroll data submitted to CMS by nursing homes] .Quarter 1 2025 [October 1-December 31], the PBJ report indicated excessively low weekend staffing was triggered which meant the facility submitted PBJ reports with excessively low weekend staffing. 2. A confidential resident council meeting was conducted with facility residents on 6/17/25 at 10 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 6/16/25 at 11 A.M. an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 163. Resident 163 was observed with a PICC line on his right upper arm. On 6/18/25 at 3:20 P.M., an interview and record review was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 5. LN 5 stated the facility received Resident 163 with PICC line from the hospital. LN 5 stated their facility had a batch order for PICC lines including dressing change and flushing. According to Resident 163's record, there was no documented evidence of a physician order related to Resident 163's PICC line length and circumference monitoring and there was no documented evidence of monitoring related to Resident 163's PICC line. A review with LN 5 of the facility's policy entitled Acknowledgements, revised date July 2016, indicated .(5) Length of catheter is specific to resident. This length needs to be documented in the medical record by the person who is placing catheter. The catheter length is usually altered from original manufacturer length according to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly store and label medications when: 1. An inhaler (a portable device for administering a drug which is to be breathed in) was identified at a resident's bedside, with no label indicating name or dose (Resident 113), and 2. inhalers were not labeled with an open date 3. external and internal medications were stored together As a result, the facility could not ensure medications were safely stored to ensure their integrity. Findings: 1. Resident 113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include legal blindness, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease), per the facility admission Record. A record review was conducted on [DATE]. Resident 113 had a physician's order, dated [DATE], for Symbicort inhaler to be administered twice a day for COPD. An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 113 in her room on [DATE] at 3:20 P.M. Resident 113 stated she was leaving for physical therapy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a kitchen freezer was serviced and maintained to prevent the formation of condensation. As a result, frozen vegetables stored within the freezer had condensation accumulated, resulting in freezer burn and the risk of contamination. Findings: A concurrent observation and interview was conducted in the kitchen on 6/16/25 at 8:28 A.M. with the Director of Food and Nutrition (DFN). The freezer thermometer registered 20 degrees Fahrenheit (F, a unit of measurement). Frozen droplets of water hung down from the top of the freezer. Bagged frozen vegetables were on the top shelf of the freezer, and the bags appeared to have defrosted then refrozen into solid blocks. The DFN stated the freezer should be at zero degrees F, and the foods must have gotten condensation inside. The DFN stated he was not aware the freezer was above a safe temperature range but there was a risk for foodborne illness if the freezer was above zero degrees. The DFN stated it was unsafe to serve the vegetables due to the possible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure appropriate brief size was provided for one of one resident (164). As a result, Resident 164 felt uncomfortable. Findings: On 6/17/25 at 9:33 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 164. Resident 164 stated she was not happy since admission because she was placed on a brief size smaller than she needed. Resident 164 stated she was uncomfortable on the brief size the facility provided. Resident 164 stated she developed irritations and rashes on perineal area because the brief was too tight on her. Resident 164 stated she had to purchase the appropriate brief size just to be comfortable. On 6/17/25 at 4:12 P.M., an observation and interview were conducted with two Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) during Resident 164 brief change. CNA 21 stated she have worked at the facility for three months, and the facility did not have a 3XL brief size, which was the correct size for Resident 164. Resident 164 was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a nursing assessment tool) for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 31) reviewed for MDS accuracy. This deficient practice resulted in providing inaccurate information to the Federal database (information maintained by the federal government) and had the potential for Resident 31 to not receive appropriate care. Findings: Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA- a problem in which breathing pauses during sleep due to blocked airways) according to the facility's admission Record. During an observation and interview on 6/16/25 at 9:19 A.M., Resident 31 was in bed with two small machines on top of the bedside drawer. Resident 31 stated one machine was a bilevel positive airway pressure (BIPAP-machine as breathing support and administered through a face mask or nasal mask) machine and the other was for a breathing treatment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not develop patient centered care plans for one of six residents reviewed for care plans when: 1. Resident 7's bowel and bladder incontinence was not care planned; 2. Resident 7 did not have a care plan for the use of heparin (blood thinner). Cross reference F690 This failure had the potential for Resident 7 to not receive appropriate care, treatment, and interventions. Findings: 1. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including need for assistance with personal care and other abnormalities of gait (walking) and mobility according to the facility's admission Record. During an observation and interview on 6/17/25 at 8 A.M., Resident 7 was in bed with a urinal (plastic urine bottle) hanging on the left bed rail. Resident 7 stated he used the urinal but had to be changed when he was not able to hold his urine. Resident 7 stated he felt uncomfortable being wet all over. Resident 7 further stated he was able to get up to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an Activities program to meet a resident's preferences for one of one residents reviewed for Activities (Resident 36). This failure had the potential to not support Resident 36's psychosocial well being. Findings: Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include macular degeneration (a loss or distortion of vision), per the facility admission Record. An observation and interview was conducted on 6/16/25 at 9 A.M. with Resident 36. Resident 36 was in bed, awake and alert. The room was dark, and the television was off. Resident 36 responded to questions asked by saying yes, and waved her hand. Resident 36 was smiling. An observation was conducted of Resident 36 on 6/17/25 at 3:34 P.M. Resident 36 was awake and alert, in bed. The room was quiet, and the television was off. The television was positioned on the wall across from Resident 36's feet, approximately 10 feet from her head. Resident 36 smiled and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain bowel and bladder status for one of three residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence (involuntary loss of feces and urine) . (Resident 7) This failure had the potential for Resident 7 to develop pressure sores and affect Resident 7's dignity and comfort. Findings: Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including need for assistance with personal care and other abnormalities of gait (walking) and mobility according to the facility's admission Record. During an observation and interview on 6/17/25 at 8 A.M., Resident 7 was in bed with a urinal (plastic urine bottle) hanging on the left bed rail. Resident 7 stated he used the urinal but had to be changed when he was not able to hold his urine. Resident stated he felt uncomfortable when wet with urine. Resident 7 stated when he was at home, he was able to get up to go to the bathroom by himself. A concurrent record review and interview was conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to evaluate the nutritional status of one of two residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 19). This failure had the potential to result in weight loss or further compromise their health. Findings: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include adult failure to thrive (FTT, a loss of appetite, decreased activity, and weight loss), per the facility admission Record. An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 19 in her room on 6/16/25 at 8:30 A.M. Resident 19 had eaten less than half of the foods on her breakfast tray, and stated the food did not taste good to her. Resident 19 stated she had complained about the food to staff, but it did not get better. A record review was conducted on 6/19/25. Resident 19's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool) indicated moderately impaired cognition. Resident 19's scaled weights indicated she had been weighed twice over the last year. Resident 19's care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolatedEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt and evaluate the use of nonpharmacological interventions (NPIs, healthcare treatments that do not involve medications, such as music or massage) for one of one resident reviewed for behaviors (Resident 16). This failure had the potential to result in overmedication. Findings: Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (a loss of memory, thinking or language and changes in behavior), per the facility admission Record. An observation was conducted of Resident 16 in her room on 6/16/25 at 3:15 P.M. Resident 16 was screaming, not making eye contact. No words were identifiable. Staff did not respond to the screaming, which continued for approximately three minutes. The television was off, no music was heard in the room. An observation was conducted of Resident 16 in her room on 6/17/25 at 3:53 P.M. Resident 16 was again screaming, scratching at her right shoulder. A Certified Nursing Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent when two out of 26 medications were administered incorrectly. The facility's error rate was 7.69%. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the residents' health and safety. Findings: On 6/18/25 at 8:51 A.M., a medication administration observation was conducted with licensed nurse (LN) 21. LN 21 prepared and administered medications to Resident 19. During the medication administration observation, there were seven (7) total oral pills counted but LN 21 had six (6) medication pills in the medication cup. LN 21 stated total count of medications were two capsules and four tablets. LN 21 stated the total number of oral pills should be seven (7). One of the medication LN 21 did not include was Citalopram (medication for depression). The following medication pills were in the medication cup (six total number): Gabapentin 300 (milligram) mg one yellow capsule Potassium chloride 20 meq ER (milli-equivalent, extended release) one tablet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate storage of respiratory (related to breathing) equipment for one of one resident reviewed for infection control. (Resident 31) This failure had the potential for cross contamination (spread of germs and bacteria) and infection. Findings: Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA- a problem in which breathing pauses during sleep due to blocked airways) according to the facility's admission Record. During an observation and interview on 6/16/25 at 9:19 A.M., Resident 31 was in bed with two small machines on top of the bedside drawer. Resident 31 stated one machine was a bilevel positive airway pressure (BIPAP-machine as breathing support and administered through a face mask or nasal mask) machine and the other was for a breathing treatment. The BIPAP tubing was hanging from the BIPAP machine and connected to a face mask. The mask was observed to be on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect 1 of 5 residents from physical abuse from another resident of the facility. (Resident 2). This failure resulted in Resident 2 being kicked in the shins. In addition, there was a potential for a repeat physical abuse from the same resident. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness and anxiety (feeling of fear, dread and uneasiness) according to the facility's admission Record. An interview was conducted on 3/4/25 at 9:45 A.M. with Resident 2. Resident 2 was on a wheelchair in her room. Resident 2 stated she had another altercation with Resident 1 whose room was two doors away from her room. Resident 2 stated Resident 1 came to the doorway and offered coffee to her roommate. Resident 2 stated she told Resident 1 not to enter the room and Resident 1 got angry and told Resident 2 that the room was not just hers. Resident 2 stated she responded that it was her room and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan (the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for each resident immediately upon their admission) meeting was conducted within 48 hours for two residents (Resident 2 and 6) reviewed for baseline care planning. This failure had the potential for an incomplete and lack of care interventions for residents in an event of a serious change of condition to potentially occur to residents after admission. In addition, the lack of communication among facility staff and responsible party had the potential to affect the quality of care to the resident. Findings: 1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cardiomyopathy (a disease of the heart muscle causing the heart to have a harder time pumping blood to the rest of the body) and prostate (part of the reproductive system in men) cancer according to the facility's admission Record. During an interview on 1/10/24 at 1:39 pm with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure three of four residents were provided care in a manner that promoted dignity and respect. (Resident 2, 3 and 4) These failures resulted in not ensuring resident's rights to be treated with respect and dignity with the potential to cause psychosocial harm to the involved residents. Cross reference F725 Findings: 1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including need for assistance with personal care and obstructive (hindrance of normal urine flow) and reflux uropathy (urine flowing backwards) according to the facility ' s admission Record. During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 7/19/24, section C0500 indicated Resident 2 ' s score was 15, cognition (thinking, reasoning, or remembering) was intact. Section GG0130 indicated Resident 2 was dependent with toileting hygiene. During an observation and interview on 9/20/24 at 10:16 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing was provided for the residents of the facility when: 1. Resident 2 ' s brief was not changed for over nine hours. 2. Resident 3 held her urine for an hour before staff came to assist. 3. Resident 4 ' s brief was not changed for over four hours. As a result, Residents 2 and 3 sat on a soiled and wet pad, and Resident 4 waited over 4 hours to be changed. Failure to change a soiled, wet pads had the potential for residents to develop a skin breakdown and the potential to affect their emotional and psychosocial well-being. Cross reference F550 Findings: 1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including need for assistance with personal care and obstructive (hindrance of normal urine flow) and reflux uropathy (urine flowing backwards) according to the facility ' s admission Record. During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent an avoidable fall for one resident (Resident 2) who had a previous fall history. This failure caused the resident to sustain a right femoral neck fracture (a type of hip fracture). Review of Resident 2 ' s history and physical dated 10/12/23 indicated Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] for diagnoses which include Pathological Fractures, Fracture of Odontoid Process (a bone in resident ' s spine), recurrent falls, and orthostatic hypotension(symptomatic low blood pressure when changing position). Per History and Physical, Resident 2 was .transferred from another SNF, where she was admitted after an unwitnessed fall and was unable to get up. Reportedly she had walked into dining room, felt lightheaded, then passed out .She also has history of another fall in 2/23 .Plan .Orthostatic vitals, careful position changed, Fall precautions . On 5/31/21 at 10 A.M. an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 was conducted. CNA 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care services for three residents (Resident 5, 6 and 7) who used CPAP machines (continuous positive airway pressure-a machine that delivers mild air pressure through the nose to keep breathing airways open while asleep) when: 1. There was no ongoing assessment to evaluate resident's respiratory status and response to the use of the CPAP machine. (Resident 5 and Resident 6) 2. The medication administration record was signed when Resident 5's CPAP was not available. In addition, Resident 5's medical record did not indicate staff follow up of Resident 5's CPAP according to physician's order. 3. Resident 7 used a CPAP machine but did not have a physician's order. These failures had the potential for residents to receive inappropriate care and treatment to address their respiratory problems. Findings: 1. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA- a problem in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control standards of practice when respiratory equipment were not stored appropriately for two residents (Resident 5 and Resident 6). This failure had the potential for residents to acquire an infection. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA- a problem in which breathing pauses during sleep due to blocked airways) according to the facility's admission Record. During an observation and interview on 4/4/24 at 9:42 A.M., Resident 5 was sitting at the edge of her bed with a CPAP machine on top of the bedside drawer. The CPAP machine was connected to a tubing and mask exposed on top of the machine. Resident 5 further stated nobody from the facility had checked the machine or if she had applied it or not. A small oxygen tank was also observed at Resident 5's bedside with an oxygen tubing hanging on the tank. The tubing did not have a date. Resident 6 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident ' s ability to self-administer medications for one of one resident reviewed for self-administration of medications. (Resident 2). This failure had the potential to affect Resident 2 ' s health and safety. In addition, this failure resulted in Resident 2 to run out of the medication without staff knowledge. Findings: Resident 2 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including psoriasis (skin condition which skin cells build up and form scales and itchy, dry patches) according to the facility ' s admission Record. During an interview on 3/5/24, at 9:54 A.M. with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated her primary physician ordered betamethasone cream for her psoriatic arthritis (type of arthritis causing painful swelling in the joints). Resident 2 stated the medication helped with the discomfort caused by the psoriatic arthritis. During an interview with the treatment nurse (TN) on 3/5/24, at 11:29 A.M., the TN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance to a resident who required total dependence on activities of daily living (ADL). (Resident 4) As a result, Resident 4 fell off the bed. Findings: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia (loss of ability to move both arms and legs) according to the facility ' s admission Record. An observation and interview of Resident 4 was conducted on 3/5/24, at 10:21 A.M. Resident 4 was lying in bed with head slightly elevated. Resident 4 stated a nurse pushed him off the bed and landed on the floor. Resident 4 stated the nurse was providing care, rolled him to his right side and told the nurse to stop but did not stop rolling him which caused him to fall off the bed. Resident 4 further stated he could not move his arms or legs and required staff assistance with ADLs. During an interview on 3/5/24, at 11:42 A.M. with certified nurse assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated Resident 4 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to safely store a medication for one of one resident reviewed for drug storage. (Resident 2) This failure had the potential for unauthorized people or residents to have access to the medication. Findings: Resident 2 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including psoriasis (skin condition which skin cells build up and form scales and itchy, dry patches) according to the facility ' s admission Record. During an interview on 3/5/24, at 9:54 A.M. with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated her primary physician ordered betamethasone cream for her psoriatic arthritis (type of arthritis causing painful swelling in the joints). Resident 2 stated the medication helped with the discomfort caused by the psoriatic arthritis. An interview and concurrent record review was conducted with licensed nurse (LN) 1 on 3/5/34, at 10:48 A.M. LN 1 stated Resident 1 had a physician ' s order for Betamethasone to be applied to affected area every day and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records when: 1. A treatment administration record for a resident (Resident 2) was inaccurately signed by a licensed nurse and 2. A resident ' s (Resident 9) inventory of personal belongings was not completed upon resident ' s discharge. As a result, Resident 2 ' s clinical record contained an inaccurate documentation and Resident 2 did not receive the care and skin treatment as ordered by the physician. In addition, Resident 9 ' s personal belongings went missing. Findings: 1. Resident 2 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including psoriasis (skin condition which skin cells build up and form scales and itchy, dry patches) according to the facility ' s admission Record. During an interview on 3/5/24, at 9:54 A.M. with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated her primary physician ordered betamethasone cream for her psoriatic arthritis (type of arthritis causing painful swelling in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-01-27 · tag F0800 — widespreadProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure overall systematic operations of the food and nutrition services with the necessary oversight to ensure the daily nutritional needs of the residents were met. This deficient practice led to a resident (Resident 29), to experience severe avoidable weight loss in six months, the potential for other facility residents to experience weight loss, malnutrition, and widespread food borne illness, which can affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 66. Cross reference F692, F802, F803, F806, F809 and F812 Findings: During the survey from January 24 through January 27, 2022, the survey team observed several deficient practices in the execution of food and nutrition services in the areas of food preparation, storage, safety, kitchen sanitation, food availability, and menu and recipe compliance. In addition, inconsistent nutrition care evaluations and recommendations for vulnerable residents resulted in further decline in nutrition status and a severe weight loss for a sampled resident. 1. Food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-01-27 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespreadEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure snacks were consistently offered to residents three times a day, particularly an evening snack as per facility policy. This failure had the potential to negatively alter nutrition status and not meet the nutritional needs of residents in need of an evening snack. Cross reference F800, F806 Findings: 1. Resident 54 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], due to diabetes (high blood sugar), per the facility's admission Record. On 1/25/22 at 4:19 P.M., a review of Resident 54's electronic record was conducted. Resident 54's record indicated a weight loss of 15.7 pounds (lbs) from September 2021 (137.8 lbs on 9/14/21) to January 2022 (122.1 lbs on 1/14/22). Resident 54's nutrition evaluation on 12/8/21 indicated one of the interventions for Resident 54 was to receive daily snacks between meals. On 1/26/22 at 9:27 A.M., an interview with CNA 21 was conducted. CNA 21 stated Resident 54 got graham crackers only when she asked for it.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary measures were met in the kitchen during dietary operations according to standards of practice when: 1. A Diet Aide (DA 1) found 12 oatmeal/soup bowls stored as clean with crusted brown oats, dirt and food debris; 2. Food items were not properly labeled and dated, including thawed ReadyCare (protein shakes), an opened clear bin of dried black eyed peas, and a bag of cilantro leaves; 3. The following items were stored inappropriately in a food preparation area: a gallon of liquid bleach, a staff personal belonging, and a radio; and 4. Six scoopers and one spatula were stored wet in a drawer. These findings had the potential to expose the facility's residents to unsafe and unsanitary food practices that could lead to widespread foodborne illnesses. Findings: 1. On 1/24/22 at 8:06 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with DA 1 and the DSS. There were 12 oatmeal/soup bowls stacked side by side in a large gray rack. The bowls had several pieces of crusted brown oat flakes, dirt…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide RNA (Restorative Nursing Assistant) range of motion (ROM) exercises per physician's order for Residents 31, 38, and 43. This had the potential to promote the development of contractures (condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue leading to deformity and rigidity of joints). Findings: 1. Resident 31 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), per the admission Record. On 1/24/21 at 8:52 A.M., an observation of Resident 31 was conducted. Resident 31 was in bed, with her left arm supported by pillows. LN 2 repositioned Resident 31, and stated, She cannot move her arms or legs herself due to a stroke. We reposition her for comfort and to prevent skin problems. I think she gets RNA. On 1/27/22 a record review was conducted. Resident 31 had physician's orders, dated 6/20/21, for an RNA referral to provide exercises, or ROM, seven times…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-27 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the Food and Nutrition Services staff maintained current competency in dietetic task operations to safely carry out the kitchen functions in a sanitary manner according to the facility's policies and standards of practice when: 1. The A.M. and P.M. cooks did not take food temperatures of the lunch meal served on 1/24/22, including the chicken breast, green beans, pureed rice and pureed black beans; 2. CK1 and the DSS were unable to verbalize the proper final cooking temperature of chicken; 3. CK1 poured sanitizer solution from a red bucket in the food preparation (prep) sink that splashed on three trays of uncovered sliced chicken breast; and 4. CK 2 improperly calibrated a food thermometer. These failures had the potential to result in contamination of food leading to widespread food borne illness for 66 residents who consume food from the kitchen. Cross reference F803 and F812 Findings: 1. On 1/24/22, a review of the facility's cooks spreadsheet titled Winter Menus, was conducted. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and document reviews, the facility failed to ensure the recipes for the beef enchilada, chicken jambalaya, and alternate menu's chef's salad and turkey sandwich, were followed as printed and per menu guidance. These failures led to residents not receiving food on the menu or a substitution, as planned, which had the potential to reduce food intake and impact nutritional status. Cross reference F800, F802 Findings: 1. On 1/24/22 a review of the facility's diet menu spreadsheet titled Winter Menus Week 4 Monday 1/24/22 signed by the RD, was conducted. The lunch meal entree for Monday, 1/24/22 listed beef enchiladas. A review of the recipe titled, Beef Enchiladas Week 4 Monday, was conducted. The beef enchilada recipe ingredients indicated to use beef, cooked (ground or shredded) or ground, raw beef. On 1/24/22 at 10:33 A.M., an observation of the lunch preparation and trayline was conducted. CK 1 removed pre packaged beef enchiladas from a brown case. CK 1 stated the menu for 1/24/22 was beef enchiladas, black beans and cilantro lime rice. CK 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physicians Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms were accurate and matched the facility's code status (the level of medical interventions a person wishes to have if their heart or breathing stops) for one of nine residents (Resident 4) reviewed for advanced directives. This failure had the potential for Resident 4 to receive the incorrect care in the event of an emergency. Findings: Resident 4 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], per the admission Record. On [DATE] at 9:08 A.M., a record review was conducted. A POLST, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 4 wanted a Do Not Resuscitate status (DNR, allowing a natural death). The Physician's Orders were reviewed, and no order indicating code status was identified. On [DATE] at 3:30 P.M., an interview was conducted with LN 1. LN 1 stated the computer system used by the facility had two places where code status would be documented. Per LN 1, the Physician Orders would indicate DNR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and comfortable homelike environment was provided to its residents when: 1. Three of four residents reviewed for personal belongings reported items missing and not replaced (35, 43, 50), and, 2. A medication was found in a public hallway. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' health and well-being. Findings: 1 a. Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] per the facility admission Record. Per Resident 35's Resident's Clothing and Possession document on admission dated 12/17/21, Resident 35 had 1 belt, 1 shoes, 2 slacks, 1 sweater 1 watch, 1 shirt, 1 cane and money in safe. The following was listed as Resident 35's list of his clothing on admission: one gray jeans, one brown carpenter jeans, one long sleeve royal blue shirt, one red polo shirt, one red, white and blue sweater. On 1/24/22 at 9:34 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 35. Resident 35 stated he lost his clothes during the first…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess multiple red and black discolorations observed on both arms and both legs for one of two residents reviewed for skin conditions (Resident 52). This failure had the potential to result in delayed provision of care and treatment for the resident's skin condition. Findings: Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include muscle weakness and dementia (a disease of the brain which affects memory and thinking), per the admission Record. On 1/24/22 at 10:30 A.M., a concurrent interview and observation was conducted with Resident 52. Resident 52 was in bed, dressed in a short-sleeved shirt and pants. Resident 52's arms had multiple, irregular shaped areas which appeared dark red to black in color. Resident 52 stated she did not know what happened to her arms. Resident 52's lower legs were visible below her pants, and also had multiple discolored areas dark red to black in color. Resident 52 stated she did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure LN 2 followed the facility's policy and procedure prior to administering medications through a tube feeding for one of one residents observed for tube feeding (Resident 31). This failure had the potential for Resident 31 to further develop medical complications. Findings: Resident 31 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and gastrostomy (a tube for feeding directly into the stomach), per the admission Record. On 1/26/22 at 8:52 A.M., an observation of medication administration was conducted with LN 2 in Resident 31's room. LN 2 flushed the gastrostomy tube with 30 milliliters (mL) of water, then administered each medication separately through the tube. On 1/26/22, a record review was conducted. Resident 31's Physician's Orders indicated to check the tube every shift for residuals (tube feeding which remained in the stomach), and to hold the tube feeding if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent. The facility's medication error rate was 7.14%. Two medication errors were observed, a total of 28 opportunities, during the medication administration process for two of six randomly observed residents (Residents 2, 5, 15, 31, 47, and 256). As a result, the facility could not ensure medications were correctly administered to all residents. Findings: 1. On 1/26/22 at 8:02 A.M., an observation of medication administration was conducted with LN 2. LN 2 prepared and administered medication to Resident 47, including a multivitamin. On 1/26/22 at 10 A.M., a record review was conducted. Resident 47 had a Physician's Order for one tablet of multivitamin with minerals to be administered daily. On 1/26/22 at 10:11 A.M., an interview was conducted with LN 2. LN 2 stated the wrong medication had been given. LN 2 stated she had the multivitamins with minerals in the medication cart, but she did not choose the right bottle. Per LN 2, she should have administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that substitutes and meal alternatives were offered and made available to accommodate a resident's allergies and food preferences for one of three residents reviewed for food preferences (Resident 21). This failure led to Resident 21 to receive foods listed as dislikes or allergies on his meal card, and had the potential to impair food intake and nutrition status. Cross Reference F800, F802 and F803 Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 1/24/22 at 12:47 P.M., an observation and interview of Resident 21 in his room was conducted. Resident 21 stated he was allergic to beef and oranges, and can only have turkey, chicken and fish. Resident 21 stated he often received the alternative entree of chicken from the kitchen, but it was sometimes undercooked and raw. Resident 21 stated he liked the turkey sandwich but sometimes did not get it. On 1/26/22 at 11:37 A.M., an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food and kitchen equipment were maintained in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when: 1. Frozen dough was not sealed properly inside one of one freezers; 2. An ice machine was not cleaned thoroughly for one of one ice machines; and 3. Raisins stored in the dry storage area were not stored properly. These failures had the potential for cross contamination and to placed residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings: 1. On 10/7/19 at 7:23 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with the DSS during initial inspection of the freezer. A cardboard box on a middle shelf of the freezer was partially opened. The box was removed and a plastic bag, containing frozen dough balls was observed through the opening of the box. The plastic bag was not tied or secured and the dough had been exposed to the freezer elements. The DSS stated the dough within the plastic bag was not secured and the product was exposed to air. The DSS stated particles could have fallen in the unsecured…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable noise levels at night for two of 18 sampled residents (34, 213), and for three of five CRs (CR 2, CR 3, CR 4). This failure resulted in residents being unable to sleep at night. Findings: 1. Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's admission Record. On 10/7/19 at 9:27 A.M., an interview with Resident 34 was conducted. Resident 34 stated, Noisy, that's my only complaint, night shift Resident 34 stated, the NOC did so much laughing, he could not sleep. Resident 34 stated, the staff did not realize there were people living in their work-place. Resident 34 further stated, the NOC would be quiet for a few nights, but when a new set of NOC staff started, the noise level would increase again. On 10/8/19 at 11:57 A.M., a second interview with Resident 34 was conducted. Resident 34 stated the noise level the previous night was still the same. A review of Resident 34's medical record was conducted. The MDS (an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-10 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for PTSD (Post traumatic stress disorder-an anxiety disorder that develops following distressing life events. Symptoms include flashbacks, nightmares of the incident, avoiding people or memories of the trauma, anger, and difficulty sleeping) for one of twenty-one sampled residents (162) reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice created the potential for Resident 162 to not receive services related to the PTSD. Findings: Resident 162 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included PTSD per the facility's admission Record. On 10/8/19 at 9:03 A.M., an interview and observation of Resident 162 was conducted. Resident 162 stated she had been taking Ambien (medication for sleep) for her nightmares and Xanax (medication for anxiety) for her panic attacks for over 18 years. Resident 162 stated she had PTSD and needed both medications to keep from having flashbacks of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-10 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents reviewed for psychosocial well-being, received a psychosocial assessment (162). This deficient practice created the potential for Resident 162 to not have received needed mental health treatment. Findings: Resident 162 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included PTSD (Post traumatic stress disorder is an anxiety disorder that develops following distressing life events. Symptoms include flashbacks, nightmares of the incident, avoiding people or memories of the trauma, anger, and difficulty sleeping) per the facility's admission Record. On 10/8/19 at 9:03 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 162. Resident 162 stated she had PTSD. Resident 162 had tears in her eyes, looked away, and did not provide eye contact. Resident 162 stated she would stay in her room and use her headphones to drown out the screaming outside in the hallway. On 10/8/19, a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-10 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (162) reviewed for mental conditions, received treatment. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 162 to have experienced emotional distress. Findings: Resident 162 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included PTSD (Post traumatic stress disorder is an anxiety disorder that develops following distressing life events. Symptoms include flashbacks, nightmares of the incident, avoiding people, memories of the trauma, anger, and difficulty sleeping) per the facility's admission Record. On [DATE] at 9:03 A.M., an observation and interview of Resident 162 was conducted. Resident 162 stated she had PTSD for over 18 years and took medications that helped to prevent nightmares, flashbacks of the traumatic event, and panic attacks. Resident 162 stated she took Ambien (a medication) for sleep to keep from having nightmares or flashbacks. Resident 162 stated she took Xanax (anxiety medication)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. A medication card was labeled accurately for Resident 215 during medication administration observation. 2. An expired IV (intravenous) solution bag was removed from one of one IV carts inspected. These failures had the potential for adverse reactions. Findings: 1. On [DATE] at 8:17 A.M., an observation of LN 1 was conducted during a medication administration for Resident 215. LN 1 removed a medication card labeled, Bupropion (medication to treat depression) 75 mg tab #42. Generic for Wellbutrin 75 mg tab take 3 tablets (150 mg) by mouth daily. The medication card contained three packaged pink tablets per dose. LN 1 removed one dose and administered the medication to Resident 215. On [DATE] at 1:44 P.M., an interview and joint record review with LN 1 was conducted. LN 1 compared the medication label for Resident 215's Wellbutrin to the eMAR. Resident 215 was to receive a total of 150 mg (two 75mg tablets), according to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-10 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on dietary staff observations, interviews, and document reviews, the facility failed to ensure safe and effective Dietetic Service oversight between the facility and the Registered Dietician. Failure to ensure effective oversight of the day to day dietary operations had the potential to place 74 residents at nutritional risk, and in turn, further compromising the residents medical status. Findings: During the annual recertification survey from 10/7/19 through 10/10/19, issues were identified surrounding the delivery of dietetic services in relation to: 1) The oversight of food safety, sanitation, food storage within the kitchen and resident food brought in by visitors. (cross reference F812 and F813); and 2) The evaluation of dietary staff competency (cross reference F802), On 10/8/19 at 9:39 A.M., an interview was conducted with RD 1. RD 1 stated she worked part time, two days a week at the facility. Her duties included assessing residents dietary needs, clinical reviews, oversite of the dietary department, approving menus and attending quality assurance meetings. RD 1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-10 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ dietary staff with the competencies and skills to carry out the daily functions of food and nutrition services, when: 1. DA 1 did not know the correct concentration of the sanitizing solution used to sanitize kitchen surfaces; and, 2. CK 2 performed and documented food temperature checks 45 minutes before lunch was served. Theses failures had the potential for kitchen surfaces not being sanitized correctly and food temperature to be incorrect at the time of plating, which could have placed residents at risk of gastrointestinal illnesses. Findings: 1. On 10/08/19 at 10:45 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with DA 1. DA 1 stated the chlorine based sanitizer test strips should read 200-300 ppm (parts per million) when tested. DA 1 demonstrated, leaving the test strip in the chlorine based solution for five seconds. DA 1 estimated his test strip concentration was between 200 ppm or 300 ppm on the test strip container. On 10/8/19 at 10:49 P.M., the DSS approached and stated the test strip…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-10 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal food brought in for residents by family and friends was stored in a safe manner for one of one designated refrigerators when: 1. Refrigerator temperatures were not being monitored daily to ensure correct temperatures were maintained; and, 2. Resident food was not labeled and dated properly when placed in the residents refrigerator. This failure had the potential for residents to be exposed to foodborne illnesses (food poisoning) if consumed. Findings: 1. On 10/8/19 at 8:34 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the DON of the resident's personal food refrigerator, located in the staff lounge. A temperature log for the interior refrigerator and freezer could not be located. There was no documented evidence of daily temperature monitoring being performed. The freezer contained no thermometer. The DON stated he did not know who was responsible for monitoring the refrigerator temperatures, but there should be a temperature log with daily entries. On 10/8/19 at 8:47 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately and consistently document urine outputs (a method used to measure fluid balance within the body), according to professional standards for one of three residents (59) reviewed for catheter care. This failure had the potential for Resident 59's fluid imbalances not to being identified by staff in a timely manner. Findings: Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included obstructive and reflux uropathy (urine flow is blocked), per the facility's admission Record. On 10/7/19 at 8:49 A.M., an observation was conducted of Resident 59. Resident 59 was lying in bed, with a urine catheter (a clear flexible tube that drains urine from the bladder to a collection bag) draining yellow fluid to a collection bag clipped to the lower bed frame. On 10/10/19, a record review was conducted for Resident 59's catheter care. According to the physician's order, dated 9/13/19, .monitor intake (fluid taken in) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices when: 1. A blood pressure cuff was not sanitized (to clean and make free of disease causing elements) between resident use. (34, 216); and, 2. A urinary catheter collection bag was not positioned below Resident 59's bladder and was allowed to touch the floor. These failures had the potential to spread infection and cause illnesses. Findings: 1. On 10/9/19 at 9:03 A.M., an observation was conducted of LN 21 obtaining Resident 216's blood pressure. LN 21 used ABHR to sanitize his hands, removed the BP cuff from the medication cart, and obtained Resident 216's BP. LN 21 returned to the medication cart, placed the BP cuff on the medication cart, and sanitized his hands with the ABHR. LN 21 proceeded to Resident 34. On 10/9/19 at 9:14 A.M., an observation was conducted of LN 21 obtaining Resident 34's blood pressure. LN 21 hand-sanitized using the ABHR, removed the BP cuff from the medication cart, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| AFSHAR, POUYA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/26/2022 |
| RAPP, DAMIEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2014 |
| OH, KATHERINE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 06/01/2025 |
| SATO, AMI | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 09/09/2024 |
| WILLITS, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 09/25/2018 |
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/10/2014 |
| KEETCH, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2011 |
| TWOMAGNETS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| PORT, BARRY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/02/2025 |
| ENSIGN SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/10/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056401. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.