The Springs At Pacific Regent

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

72.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 802 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 83.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 284 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.85 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 100% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 56.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.44 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-08-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary measures were met in the kitchen during dietary operations according to standards of practice when:1. On the clean dish rack there was a cracked 7.5 quart plastic cambro container, two serving dishes that had food particles stuck on them and four wet mixing bowls stacked on a shelf.2. Refrigerated food items had a white, fuzzy substance growing on them and were stored alongside unspoiled food products. Two refrigerated peeled and cut cucumbers were wrapped in plastic and not labeled or dated.3. A large cambro container in the warming oven had a yellow, clear, liquid substance in it that was labeled as olives. Food particles and crumbs were in the drawers and on the shelves of the prep cart. A spatula was covered with a slimy, greasy coating. There were grease smudges on the back of the plate dispenser. 4. The cook (CK) took temperatures of the food on the steam table without visualizing where the temperature probe was placed. 5. The temperature of soup was not taken prior to placing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan included person-centered care during mealtimes for one of fourteen residents (Resident 86) within 48 hours of the resident's admission. This failure to develop the baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for mealtime assistance resulted in the resident calling to request mealtime set ups multiple times a day continuously since admission. Findings:A review of the facility's admission Record indicated Resident 86 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Pigmentary Retinal Dystrophy (an inherited eye disorder that causes loss of sight). On 8/3/25 at 9:10 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 86. Resident 86 stated that she was legally blind and needed help with meal tray set up. Resident 86 stated she needed staff to identify the food items and the location of the food on her plate. Resident 86 then stated that she would have to wait to eat and then call to remind the staff that she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide proper pharmaceutical services when the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Controlled Medication Count Sheet (CMCS) did not reconcile for two randomly selected residents (Resident 91 and 61). This failure had the potential to place Resident 91 and Resident 61 at risk for inaccurate pain medication administration and/or diversion (illegal distribution or abuse of prescription drugs) of controlled medications (medications that the use and possession of are controlled by the federal government). Findings:1. A review of Resident 91's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for the diagnosis including post-surgery care for joint replacement surgery and osteoarthritis (a condition where the cartilage in the joints wears down over time and causes pain). A review of Resident 91's physician order dated 7/21/25 indicated: Oxycodone HCL oral tablet (a type of controlled medication) 5 MG (milligrams). Give one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection prevention and control practices related to hand hygiene (washing hands with soap and water or using alcohol-based hand sanitizer) during wound care for one resident (Resident 51). As a result of this deficient practice, Resident 51 was at an increased risk of infection. Findings: A review of Resident 51's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) and hemiplegia (paralysis or severe weakness on one side of the body).A review of Resident 51's physician order for wound treatment dated 7/29/25, indicated Resident 51 had an unstageable pressure ulcer (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) on the coccyx (tailbone) area. On 8/6/25 at 10:24 A.M., an observation of wound treatment for Resident 51 was conducted with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for one resident (1) reviewed for wound care and treatment. This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at risk for harm related to poor wound healing and infection. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of type two diabetes mellitus (health condition in which the body is unable to regulate blood sugar levels; can lead to complications of poor circulation and multi-system problems with the eyes, heart, kidneys, and limbs [arms, legs]), per Resident 1's admission Record. A record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- nursing assessment tool that is used to develop a plan of care) dated 6/21/24 , indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIM- developed by reviewing the resident's status during the prior seven day period) score of 15 points out of 15 possible points which indicated Resident 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program when the facility did not: 1. Report coronavirus (COVID-19: A highly contagious respiratory disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) outbreaks to the local/state public health officials in a timely manner. 2. Review the facility infection control policies and procedures on an annual basis during a COVID-19 outbreak (a sudden increase in occurrences of a disease when cases are in excess of normal expectancy for the location or season) at the facility. These failures had the potential to increase the risk of healthcare-associated infections for staff, residents, and visitors in the facility. Findings: 1. A joint interview and record review of the facility's infection control log was conducted on 6/27/24 at 12 P.M., with the infection preventionist (IP) nurse. The IP stated that two nursing staff (licensed nurse [LN] 1 and 2) had COVID-19 symptoms that started on 6/16/24. The IP nurse stated that COVID-19 testing was conducted when LN 1 tested positive on 6/18/24 and LN 2 tested…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one medication (med) was administered per physician ' s order for one resident (2). Resident 2 ' s Insulin Lispro (med to control high blood sugar) was administered via injection, and not via insulin pump (medical device that supplies a continuous flow of insulin subcutaneously [beneath the skin]), as ordered. As a result, Resident 2 ' s blood sugar level dropped below a normal range. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 2 ' s health, comfort, and well-being. FINDINGS: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes type 1 (DM 1 – high blood sugar; body produces very little insulin – hormone that lowers the level of sugar in the blood), end stage renal disease (permanent kidney failure) and cirrhosis of the liver (severe scarring of the liver). A review of Resident 2 ' s medical records were conducted. The Order Summary Report, dated 4/1/2024, indicated Resident 2 had an order for Insulin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement person-centered care plans related to the monitoring and inspection of bed alarms (auditorial alarms that alerts caregivers when patients leave or attempt to leave their beds), for three of three residents (Resident 1, 2, and 3), reviewed for accidental falls. As a result, there was the potential for Resident 1, 2, and 3 ' s bed alarms to not be monitored for functionality and staff were unaware of the bed alarms were in use. Findings: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy (an inherited disease that causes strokes and other neurological impairments), per the facility ' s admission Record. On 3/1/24 Resident 1 ' s clinical record was reviewed. According to the facility ' s admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-a clinical assessment tool), dated 2/14/24, Resident 1 was alert, but aphasic (inability to form words), and required staff assistance for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess post Fall Risk Evaluations to ensure a higher score was in place after an actual fall, in order to prevent future falls from occurring for one of three residents, (Resident 2) reviewed for Accidents related to falls. As a result, post Fall Risk Evaluation scores decreased after each fall, putting Resident 2 at risk for additional falls. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included wedge compression fracture of second lumbar vertebra (lower spine) and history of falling, per the facility ' s admission Record. On 3/1/24, Resident 2 ' s clinical record was reviewed. According to the facility ' s admission MDS, dated [DATE], a cognitive score of 10 was listed, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The functional status indicated staff assistance was required to transfer (moving from lying, to standing and to sitting), eating and toilet use. The resident had a history of falls, prior…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 13 sampled resident's (24 and 107) Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) document was acknowledged and signed by the resident's physician. As a result, the residents' end of life wishes may not have been followed. Findings: 1. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included spinal stenosis, per the facility's Face Sheet. Resident 24 was cognitively intact according to the history and physical dated 7/24/23. On 8/24/23 Resident 24's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) was reviewed. The POLST in the EMR chart was signed by Resident 24 and dated 7/23/23. A copy of the POLST was requested on 8/23/23 and was received 8/24/23. The POLST was not signed by Resident 24's physician until 8/23/23. 2. Resident 107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included a stroke, per the facility's Face Sheet. On 8/24/23, Resident 107's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) was reviewed. The POLST was not found in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA