Channel Islands Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 196 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 101 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 156 beds and averages 144.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.45 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility Policy and Procedure (P/P) the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were updated following score increase, multiple subsequent falls for one and three resident (Resident 1). This facility failure resulted with resident having repeated preventable falls. During a concurrent interview on 4/12/26 at 11:30 a.m., the Minimum Data Set (MDS) coordinator confirmed that Resident 1 experienced three previous falls (on 10/17/25, 11/27/25, and 12/11/25) prior to a fourth fall on 3/31/26. This most recent incident resulted in a left periprosthetic femoral fracture (a break in the thigh bone adjacent to a hip prosthesis).A review of Resident 1's comprehensive care plan for falls initially dated 8/20/25, revised 8/30/25, revealed there was no documentation to show an updated interventions following Resident 1's multiple subsequent falls on 10/17/25, 11/27/25, and 12/11/25. While the fall on 3/31/26 was addressed, the interventions remained identical to the original 8/20/25 plan, indicating a lack of revision in response to changing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to provide care for the residents.This failure has the potential to affect the resident quality of care.A review of All Facilities Letter (AFL) dated 3/17/21, the AFL summary indicated In accordance with HSC sections 1276.5 and 1276.65, and W & I section 14126.022, this notice provides updated guidelines for facility requirements during state audits for compliance with the 3.5 DHPPD staffing requirements, of which a minimum of 2.4 DHPPD shall be performed by certified nurse assistants (CNAs).During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/19/25 at 4:30 p.m with the Director of Nursing (DON) the Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD - a staffing metric for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), for the dates of 7/24/25 - 8/6/25 was reviewed. On 7/6/25 (Saturday) the actual DHPPD was 3.03 and for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was 1.71.On 7/2/25 (Sunday) the actual DHPPD was 2.93 and for CNA was 1.82. On 8/1/25 (Friday) the actual DHPPD for CNA was 2.24.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a significant change in condition for one of three sampled resident (Resident 1) was communicated to ensure prompt consult with the resident's physician when the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) noticed Resident 1 was becoming more tired and needed to be assisted with meals. This failure resulted in delay in treamnet for the resident. Review of Resident I clinical records indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alcohol cirrhosis (chronic liver failure) of liver with ascites (abnormal build up of fluid in the abdomen), hepatic encephalopathy (altered level of consciousness as a result of liver failure), pleural effusion (accumulation of excessive fluid in the space that surrounds each lung), heart failure, generalized swelling. Furhter review of clinical records showed, Resident 1 had a change of condition (COC) on 7/08/2025, for weakness and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and COC…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) the right to retain and use personal possessions when a denture delivered to the resident was never documented nor found. This facility failure has the potential to create negative consequences whereby the resident feels not treated with respect. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 6/4/25, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with including diagnosis of Anxiety disorders (a group of mental health conditions characterized by excessive and persistent worry, fear) and altered mental status (AMS - refers to a change in a person's level of consciousness, awareness, or cognitive function). Further review of Resident 1's Dental notes record indicated dated 11/21/22, that Resident 1 full upper and full dentures were delivered. However, review of Resident 1's Inventory of Personal Effects record dated 4/15/22 showed record of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its facility policies when: 1) Four expired drugs were available to be administered to residents 2) One medication was not administered as ordered by the physician for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 43) 3) A consistent medication re-ordering process was not implemented 4) Multiple resident medications were not available timely and consistently 5) Two bags of sodium chloride (a salty solution given for dehydration) were inside the intravenous emergency kit (IV e-kit: a container with all the components needed to inject fluids, nutrients, and medications directly in the veins) but were not listed on the contents label. These failures had the potential to result in negative resident outcomes, jeopardizing the quality of safety of resident care. Findings: 1. a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/07/25 at 11:30 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (RN3) inside the medication storage room, a Med Pass 2.0 (a ready to drink calorie and protein-dense nutritional shake) with a use by date of 02/10/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure with Self-Administration of Medications for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 39) found with multiple self-medications by the bedside. This failure has the potential to result in medication error. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview of Resident 39's room on 05/05/25 at 09:45 a.m., supplemental medications were found by beside namely: Primal Harvest Hair Growth - Hair Growth Complex Supplement Immuneti Advanced Immune Defense. Primal Multivitamins (primal harvest). During an interview with Resident 39 when asked about the medication, Resident 39 stated I have been taking them by myself since I moved here into here into the facility. During a review of Resident 39's medical record (MR) indicated, resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes Suicidal Ideations (thinking about or being overly focused on death and dying), Alcohol abuse (craving and drinking…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe, clean and home-like environment to 2 of 31 sampled residents (Residents 73 and 127) when: 1. Resident 127's room was found with loose floor tiles partially lifted creating a raised gap. 2. Resident 73's room was found with cobwebs in the ceiling, scratches on the wall by the headboard, and missing wall tiles in bathroom. These failures have the potential to affect residents' well-being. Findings: 1. During an observation on 5/5/25 at 10:20 a.m. in resident 127's room, one of the tiles on the floor was found to be loose and was partially lifted, creating a raised gap. During a review of the maintenance logbook for Station H2 (the section of the facility where Resident 127's room is located) reviewed dated 3/1/25 to 5/7/25 showed no requests directly added to maintenance logbook entries regarding a floor tile repairs for Resident 127's room and bathroom. During a concurrent observation and interview on 05/07/25 at 8:53 a.m. with the Maintenance supervisor (MS) in Resident 127's room, the MS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess the status of residents to reflect with the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool used to assess residents in nursing homes) for 3 of 3 unsampled residents (Resident 95, Resident 119 and Resident 130) when: 1. Resident 95 had an inaccurate assessment for injection (administering a substance using a needle and a syringe) use. 2. Resident 119 had an inaccurate assessment for anticoagulants (a medication that prevents blood clots from forming) use. 3. Resident 130 had an inaccurate assessment for tobacco use. These failures have the have the potential to prevent relevant care areas about the resident's status not being met. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 95's admission Record (AR), dated 5/5/25, the AR indicated Resident 95 had a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes (abnormal blood sugar). During a review of the Physician's Progress Notes (PPN), dated 3/30/25, the PPN indicated, Resident 95 was taking insulin (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a PASSR Level I (preliminary assessment for individuals seeking admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility to determine if they might have a serious mental illness (SMI), intellectual disability (ID), or a related condition (RC)) and Level II (a comprehensive assessment conducted on individuals identified in the Level 1 screening as potentially having a mental illness or intellectual disability ID) were conducted for 2 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 10 and Resident 92). These failures had the potential to compromise resident care planning of the actual problems not to be addressed. Findings: During a review of the Medical Records (MR) for Resident 10 on 5/6/2025 indicated, Resident 10 was admitted to the facility dated on 03/08/2024 with diagnoses that includes Unspecified Schizophrenia' (a condition where a resident's symptoms do not meet the full diagnostic criteria for Schizophrenia or another more specific psychotic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), the facility failed to store medications in the storage refrigerator under proper temperature controls. This failure has the potential to result in a loss of effectiveness in medications. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/07/25 at 11:49 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (RN3), the thermometer inside the medication storage refrigerator, there were Tuberculin (PPD - a diagnostic reagent used in the tuberculin skin test (TST) to detect tuberculosis (TB) infection), Insulin (medications used to treat sugar in the blood), and Hepatitis vials (single-dose vials containing purified surface antigen) stored inside the refrigerator. And the refrigerator temperature read 32°F (degrees Fahrenheit - temperature scale). During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/07/25 at 11:49 a.m. with RN3, RN3 confirmed the storage refridgerator temperature reading of 32°F and acknowledged the medications kept in the refrigerator were outside the acceptable range for the storage of medications.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA