Villa Maria Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 303 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 138 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 74.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.37 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.66 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.58 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled residents (Resident 83) had a qualified licensed nurse perform their initial comprehensive nursing assessment.This failure had the potential for Resident 83 to not have a complete initial comprehensive nursing assessment and not have all their needs met.During a review of Resident 83's admission Record (AR), dated 7/25/25, the AR indicated, Resident 83 was a [AGE] year old, admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including, heart failure (the heart not able to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), atrial flutter (uncoordinated beating of the heart), diabetes (the body is not able to turn food into energy), and cognitive communication deficit (problems with communication).During a review of Resident 83's Initial admission Record ([IAR] a comprehensive assessment,) dated 4/25/25, the IAR indicated, Neuro/Mental [brain function assessment].EENT [eye, ear, nose, mouth assessment]. Oral Assessment. Cardiovascular System [heart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sample residents (Resident 83), had a nursing note recorded in their medical record following the completion of the comprehensive assessment on admission to the facility.This failure resulted in an incomplete record of Resident 83's nursing home stay and had the potential to hinder communication among Resident 83's interdisciplinary team ([IDT], a group of healthcare professionals who work together to achieve resident comprehensive goals).During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Admission, dated 2/2023, the P&P indicated, Purpose. Obtain information about the resident to establish baseline data for the MDS and provide the basis for interdisciplinary assessment, care planning, and rehabilitation of each Resident. Licensed Nurses Procedure . Do a complete assessment of body systems and complete admission form and nursing notes.During a review of Resident 83's electronic medical record (eMR), no admission nursing note was found.During an on 7/24/25 at 4:42 p.m. with the Assistant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 6) had an appropriately sized waste bin for safely discarding used personal protective equipment (PPE), a gown worn over clothing for protecting the wearer from infection.This failure had the potential to result in the increased risk of spreading infection to residents, staff, and visitors.During an observation on 7/23/25 at 2:28 p.m. in Resident 6's room, there was a small, beige, uncovered, waste bin overflowing onto the floor with a discarded yellow PPE gown. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 1/2025, the P&P indicated, The infection prevention and control program is a facility-wide effort involving all disciplines and individuals. The facility will use effective methods for the safe storage, transport and disposal of garbage, refuse and infectious waste.During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/23/25 at 2:30 p.m. with a certified nursing assistant (CNA 1) in Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Residents 72 and 49) had a comfortable environment when foul smelling dirty linen was left in the linen cart in the hallway. This failure resulted in an uncomfortable living environment. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Environmental Conditions / Environmental Rounds, dated 1/2025, the P&P indicated, It is the policy of this facility that the facility must provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public.During an interview on 7/23/25 at 10:15 a.m. with Resident 72, Resident 72 stated the smell out in the hallway gets really bad when staff put dirtied linen in the hamper and leave it there. Resident 72 further stated the staff should at least take it down to the end of the hallway.During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/23/25 at 10:56 a.m. with a licensed nurse (LN 1), LN 1 stated there was a bad smell in the hallway. LN 1 pointed towards the blue linen collection bins, waved her hand and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when documentation of interventions for a change in condition were not accounted for. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 not receiving proper treatment during a change of condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Medical Records (MR), MR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: palliative care (medical care to improve the quality of life for people with a serious illness), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (progressive, fatal disease that affects nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), dysarthria (speech disorder that makes it hard to form and pronounce words due to muscle problems) and anarthria (complete loss of speech), cognitive communication deficit (reduced awareness and ability to initiate and effectively communicate needs), gastrostomy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Pasteurized eggs were used for egg preperations not cooked through completely according to the facility's policy and procedures (P&P). 2. Food was stored properly in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when an uncovered and undated bag of shredded mozzarella cheese was found in the refrigerator and an opened staff personal water bottle was stored in the freezer. 3. Resident food refrigerator temperatures located in the nursing station were monitored daily and corrective actions implemented for out-of-range temperature readings by the food and nutrition representative according to the facility's P&P on foods brought by family or visitor. 4. An appropriate drainage piping material was used to drain the ice machine and an appropriate air gap was maintained between the ice machine and floor drains to prevent contaminated water from backing up into the ice machine should drainage problems arise. These…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain an informed consent for the use of psychotropic medications (medications which affects mood or behavior) for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 37). This failure violated Resident 37's right to make an informed decision regarding the use of psychotropic medications and had the potential to result in resident misinformation regarding its benefits and side effects. Findings: During a review of Residen 37's, admission Records, dated 02/28/24, the records indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with admission diagnoses including but not limited to: Other psychotic disorder not due to a substance or known physiological condition, Vascular Dementia (problems with thought processes caused by brain damage from impaired blood flow to your brain), Unspecified severity with agitation, Other specified depressive episodes, and Chronic Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and accurately document a Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST - care directives during life threatening situations) and Advance Directive (legal documentation consistent with the known requests or desires of the patient's medical preference) for two of 20 sampled residents (Residents 5 and 37). These failures had the potential to result in the delay of necessary treatment compatible with the legally recognized decision maker wishes during an emergency situation. Findings: During a review of Resident 5's, admission Record, dated 04/20/24, the Record indicated in part, Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admission diagnoses including but not limited to, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI - an infection in the urinary system of the body), generalized muscle weakness, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with other skin complication, and Congestive Heart Failure. During a concurrent interview and record review on 06/04/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This is the incorrect tag Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure regarding loss or theft of resident property. Findings: During an observation on 6/3/24 at 2:10 p.m., a brown wallet containing a driver's license, social security card and military identification was observed in medication cart number one, located in a locked medication drawer. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/3/24 at 2:15 p.m. with licensed nurse (LN 2), discharged residents in Point Click Care (PCC) (point click care is a cloud-based software platform used by some health care providers to monitor and track patient care) were reviewed. PCC indicated, Resident was discharged AMA (against medical advice) on 9/8/23. LN 2 verbalized, they did not know if the former resident has been contacted, the wallet should not have been kept in the medication cart. LN 2 further verbalized, the wallet should have been taken to social services. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Theft and Loss Policy, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant change in status was comprehensively assessed for one of four sampled residents (Resident 15) using the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) specified Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI - Resident Assessment Instrument [a standardized tool used to evaluate and document clients in long term care {LTC} settings] process). This failure had the potential to result in compromised quality of care for Resident 15. Findings: During a review of Resident 15's Medical Record, the Medical Record indicated, Resident 15 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital. The psychologist's progress note dated 4/16/24, indicated, Pt. (patient) was taken off his anti-psych medications recently (when d/c'd [discharged ] from hospital) & he's become increasingly disorganized since then. Physician: please re-start Pt. on his previous level of Seroquel [an antipsychotic medication] that had been working very well. Further record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA