No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Park View Post Acute

3751 Montgomery Dr, Santa Rosa, CA 95405 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 116 certified beds · (707) 525-1250 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$9,347 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $9,347 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-30)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3863 Montgomery Dr · (707) 523-8028 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.4 mi
4610 Sonoma Hwy · (707) 538-9275 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
460 Mission Blvd · (707) 852-1031 · Call to confirm hours
Park
630 Summerfield Rd · (707) 543-3425 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.1%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.8%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.4%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.6%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.0%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.3%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.7%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.6%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.0%11.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.552.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.091.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 513 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.72U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.40hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 301 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.72 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.3%CMS range 52.2–61.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 8.6–12.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.9%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge91.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 4.4–8.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
1.43
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.59
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.49
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
30.1%
Total nursing turnover
44.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 106.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.64 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-05)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, including a Santa [NAME] Police Department Detective interview, and facility record reviews, the facility failed to protect one resident (Resident 1) of a census of 115 and sample of 77 interviewable residents, to be free from sexual abuse, when Licensed Staff B witnessed Unlicensed Staff A touching his exposed penis against Resident 1's naked body during care.This failure to protect Resident 1 from Unlicensed Staff A resulted in Resident 1 stating she told Unlicensed Staff A to stop, and it made her feel uncomfortable, and would make a reasonable person, who suffered from sexual assault by a facility staff member, to experience fear, guilt, shame, isolation, dehumanization and humiliation as a result of the sexual abuse. A review of Resident 1's medical record document titled Face Sheet, indicated she was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (A chronic, progressive brain disorder affecting chemicals in the brain, leading to impaired muscle control) with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions and in accordance with professional standards for a census of 116 when:Nonstick pans used in food preparation were visibly scratched, compromising the integrity of the cookware and increasing the risk of nonstick coating flaking into food;A manual can opener had missing metal on the tip, creating a potential physical contaminant hazard during food preparation; andItems in the refrigerators were not marked with an open date or delivery date.These failures had the potential to contribute to the spread of foodborne illnesses among a vulnerable resident population.1. During a concurrent interview and observation on 3/2/26 at 8:43 a.m., with the Food & Nutrition Director (FND), two large (12 inch) frying pans were observed hanging on the kitchen rack, indicating they were available and ready for use. Both frying pans had severely worn, non-stick coatings, exposed base metal, and carbonized build up on the food contact surfaces. The damaged surfaces were not smooth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespread
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect resident health information for a census of 116 when dietary tickets were disposed of in the facility's regular trash.This failure decreased the facility's potential to protect and safeguard resident confidentiality and personal privacy.During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/2/26 at 9:17 a.m. with the Food & Nutrition Director (FND), in the kitchen dishwashing area, a dietary aid (DA) was observed removing trays from the soiled tray carts to prepare them to be washed. The DA sorted the tray contents and threw residents' dietary tickets into the garbage can along with scraps of food. The FND stated residents' dietary tickets were thrown into the garbage with food scraps. An observation of the contents of the garbage can included 8 dietary tickets. The FND agreed the residents' name, room number, diet order, allergies, and likes and dislikes were visibly clear to read on the dietary tickets.During an interview on 3/3/26 at 8:58 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident Rights were honored when two of two sampled residents (Resident 82 and Resident 5) were not provided with privacy during routine care and while accommodating the resident's expressed preference for minimal coverings.This failure resulted in exposure of both residents in a state of undress to passers by, undermining dignity and placing residents at risk for psychosocial harm.A review of Resident 82's admission record indicated she was last admitted on 10/25 with the primary diagnosis of Unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction (long-term health problems caused by a stroke).A review of Resident 82's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 1/19/26 indicated, an interview could not be conducted with the resident for the resident is rarely/never understood.A review of Resident 5's admission record indicated she was last admitted on 11/22 with the diagnoses of Pneumonia (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor the choices and preferences for two out of two residents (Resident 113, and Resident 111) sampled for choices, when,Resident 113 requested to have her emergency inhaler, Albuterol HFA ( an inhaled respiratory medication for shortness of breath), at her bedside on admission for timely use when short of breath and staff did not honor her request.Resident 111 reported stressors related to roommate and requested a room change and staff did not respond.This failure undermined both residents' right to make choices about care and aspects of their life in the facility and contributed to feelings of anxiety and stress.A review of Resident 113's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with active diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and Depression. A review of Resident 113's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) conducted on 2/25/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication for use of an antipsychotic medication for one of five residents sampled for unnecessary medication review (Resident 48). This failure placed Resident 48 at risk for unnecessary psychotropic medication (any drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts or perception) use.A review of Resident 48's face sheet (demographics) indicated an admission date of 11/1/22, age in her 90s, and medical diagnoses including a fall with multiple fractures of the spine and Unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, among others. A review of Resident 48's physician order, dated 12/24/25, indicated Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) 12.5 mg (milligrams) by mouth two times a day for dementia with behavioral disturbance. A review of Resident 48's document titled Consent for Treatment: Use of Anti-Psychotic Medication, dated 12/24/25, indicated, Reason for treatment: Agitation/dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the State Mental Health Authority, Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), for one of two sampled residents (Resident 13), when Resident 13 experienced a significant change in mental health status and received a new diagnosis indicating serious mental illness, requiring referral for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a federal assessment requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are placed in facilities that can provide the appropriate care).This failure hindered the facility's ability to ensure Resident 13 had an up to date PASRR determination after the new serious mental illness diagnosis, creating the potential for inappropriate placement and delays in identifying and providing necessary specialized behavioral health services.A review of Resident 13's admission record indicated he was last admitted on 1/23 with the diagnoses of Cognitive Communication Deficit, Generalized Muscle Weakness, Need for Assistance with Personal Care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing accurate clinical assessment and documentation for one resident (Resident 78) when no wound assessments for a head wound were documented. This failure made it difficult to determine the wounds progression, response to treatment, and healing trajectory, when there were no assessments available for comparison. This failure had the potential for poor wound response and non- healing to go unnoticed and untreated.A review of Resident 78's admission record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Vascular (having to do with the blood vessels and circulation) Dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of Resident 78's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) dated 11/27/25 indicated he had a BIMS Score of 14 with no cognitive impairment. During an interview on 3/4/26 at 2:24 p.m. with Resident 78 in his room, Resident 78 stated, the nurses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement supervision and monitoring interventions for one of one sampled resident (Resident 6) when the facility did not prevent the resident from exiting beyond the secured patio on 3/2/26 despite her severe cognitive impairment, documented history of exit seeking, and care planned interventions such as door alarms and frequent checks.This failure resulted in Resident 6's elopement beyond the secured patio and exposed Resident 6 to significant hazards with potential for serious injury.A review of Resident 6's admission record indicated she was last admitted 4/25 with the diagnoses of Unspecified Intrascapular Fracture of Left Femur (broken hip on the left side), generalized muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and Alzheimer's Disease with Late Onset.A review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 2/4/26 indicated she had significant deficits in orientation and Resident 6's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS - an assessment tool used by facilities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and maintained in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of five residents (Resident 1) when, two medications pills were found left unattended at the bedside of Resident 1 without authorization for bedside storage or self-administration.This deficient practice created the potential for medication errors, diversion, or harm to Resident 1 or other residents.Findings:In a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (heart rhythm disorder where the heart beats irregularly and rapidly), heart failure (a condition where the heart cannot pump blood effectively enough to meet the body's needs) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities).In an observation and interview on 9/3/25 at 11:00 a.m., Resident 1 was sitting at her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records in a complete and accurately documented manner for one resident out of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when vital signs (measurements of the body's functions that include heart rate, the amount of oxygen in the blood, breaths per minute and blood pressure [the force of blood as the heart pumps]), were recorded in the resident's medical record after the resident had been transferred out of the facility.This failure resulted in inaccurate documentation in Resident 1's medical record. Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated she was an [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility in June 2025 with diagnoses which included pneumonia, (an infection in the lungs), asthma, (a chronic lung disease that inflames and narrows the airways), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, (a progressive lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe due to airflow blockage). In an interview on 7/15/25 at 3:34 p.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a resident centered care plan for one resident (Resident 1) out of four sampled residents when licensed nurse staff did not develop a care plan for Resident 1's use of a Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP- therapy for assisted breathing by delivering pressurized air through a mask). This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide resident centered care and ensure safety for Resident 1. Findings: A review of a facility document titled admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia (a severe condition in which the body struggles to remove carbon dioxide from the blood, leading to lung diseases), Sleep Apnea (a sleep disorder where the upper airway collapses, causing pauses with breathing) and Morbid Obesity (a severe disorder which involves too much body fat with co-existing health issues such as Sleep Apnea). A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of care for one resident (Resident 1) out of four sampled residents when: 1. A Licensed Nurse (LN) failed to notify the physician when Resident 1's Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP- therapy for assisted breathing by delivering pressurized air through a mask) machine became inoperable; and, 2. An LN did not notify the physician when Resident 1 was not administered an ordered medication. These failures had the potential to cause Resident 1's condition to deteriorate and complicate his clinical condition. Findings: 1. A review of a facility document titled admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia (a severe condition in which the body struggles to remove carbon dioxide from the blood, leading to lung diseases), Type 2 Diabetes (a chronic condition in which the body does not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of medication errors when one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) was not given the correct dosage of a medication, Uptravi (generic name selexipag) a medication used to treat pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure in the arteries that carry blood from the heart to the lungs). This failure had the potential for Resident 3 to have a drug overdose causing physical problems ranging from pain, rashes, weakness, organ failure, (when organs in the body such as the heart, lungs, kidneys or liver are unable to perform their critical functions), seizures or even death. Findings: During an interview on [DATE] at 11:55 a.m., Family member of Resident 3 (Family) complained that Resident 3 was given the wrong dose of her medication several times. Family stated they gave the facility a month supply of her medication from home because the medication was not available at all pharmacies. Family stated, I found out that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) received care in accordance with professional standards of practice when: 1. Resident 1 did not receive her six of her scheduled medications. 2. The physician was not notified when Resident 1 did not receive their scheduled medications. These failures could lead to worsening of condition, hospitalization, seizure (sudden burst of electrical activity in the brain) or even death. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s face sheet (demographics) indicated an admission date of 7/26/24 with a diagnosis of Epilepsy (a brain condition that causes recurring seizures) and Restless Leg Syndrome (RLS, a condition that causes a very strong urge to move the legs). A review of Resident 1 ' s electronic medication administration record (EMAR, electronic documentation of medications administered to a resident) with corresponding progress note dated 7/26/24 indicated the following medications where not administered as ordered because it was still awaiting for arrival: Atorvastatin (used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the contact enteric precaution (used when caring for residents with a suspected or confirmed infection caused by bacteria that spreads through fecal-oral transmission) on room [ROOM NUMBER] was followed when a speech therapist: 1.Did not perform hand hygiene (HH, washing hands with soap and water or using an alcohol-based hand sanitizer to prevent the spread of germs) prior to entering room [ROOM NUMBER], 2.Did not put on gloves prior to entering room [ROOM NUMBER], 3.Did not put on gown prior to entering room [ROOM NUMBER], 4.Did not wash hand with soap and water upon leaving room [ROOM NUMBER]. These failures could result to spread of infection between residents. Findings: A review of Resident 3's face sheet (demographics) indicated an admission date of 1/7/25. A review of Resident 3's Physician's Order's Summary (POS) indicated a diagnoses of Anemia (a problem of not having enough healthy red blood cells or hemoglobin to carry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the rights of five (5) unsampled residents (Resident 20, Resident 55, Resident 69, Resident 76 & Resident 63) and three (3) of 24 sampled residents (Resident 3, Resident 51 & Resident 42) were honored and respected, when: 1) facility staff did not answer or respond to call lights or call for assistance, making residents wait for 20 minutes or more; 2) the facility did not follow its Smoking Policy, when Resident 42 wheeled himself across the facility's parking lot to smoke without staff supervision, and; 3) facility staff entered and exited the building using the slider doors in the residents' rooms that opened to the back patio. These failures: 1) caused Resident 20 to feel terrible after she urinated in her bed while waiting, Resident 55 to fear for the safety of his spouse/room mate when she attempted to get out of bed after waiting for a long time, Resident 69 feeling bad after soiling his bed/linen while waiting, Resident 76…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the survey binder was updated for three years, with the results of complaint and facility-reported incident investigations, and failed to ensure the residents were notified of its location. This failure resulted in the facility's residents not having access to the results of the most recent investigations completed by the Department. Findings: During a record review and concurrent interview on 5/14/24 at 2:02 p.m., review of the survey binder in the hallway outside the Administrator's office revealed there were no complaint or facility-reported incident investigation results or plans of correction added to the binder since 2021. When queried, the Director of Nursing verified there were no investigation results added to the binder since 2021. The DON stated the reason was the facility had not had any deficiencies from the Department since the survey in 2021. During a confidential Resident Council interview on 5/14/24 at 2:32 p.m., 12 out of 12 residents did not know where to find the binder with the Department's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure four of twenty-four sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 63 & Resident 51) experienced a comfortable noise level at the facility. This finding had the potential to result in inability for the residents to rest and sleep, necessary for the body's renewal and well-being. Findings: During a concurrent interview and observation on 5/13/24 at 9:46 a.m., Resident 3 stated the noise level was too high at all times of the day and night. Resident 3 stated she had heard staff talking loudly and laughing spontaneously as late as 10:30 p.m., disturbing residents. Record review of Resident 3's MDS (Minimum Data Sheet-An assessment tool), dated 5/01/24, indicated her BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status-A cognition [the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses] assessment) score was 15, which indicated her cognition was intact (A score of 1-7 indicates the cognition is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Resident Council knew how to file a grievance. This failure could potentially result in residents' issues going unresolved. Findings: During a record review on 5/13/24 at 3:12 p.m., the past four months of Resident Council Meeting Minutes were reviewed. All minutes indicated at the top, that the notes were taken by the Activities Director. Resident Council Meeting Minutes, dated 3/26/24, revealed, New Business: . The council has asked for SS (Social Services) department to attend meeting with them and go over theft and loss, grievance an [sic] other SS related question they may have and to meet the news [sic] staff in SS. Section of minutes titled, Department concerns, revealed, Social Service: R.C. (Resident Council) has invited SS to attend next meeting to go over grievances and theft and loss. Resident Council Meeting Minutes, dated 4/30/24, revealed, New Business: *SS still to meet with the resident council. During a confidential interview on 5/14/24 at 2:43 p.m., 10 out of 12 residents in attendance did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed, when: 1. A Licensed Vocational Nurse (Licensed Staff A) left several medications in a resident's bedside table without a physician order, and; 2. Licensed Vocational Nurses were signing for the administration of intravenous medications they had not administered. These findings had the potential to result in inaccurate medical records, medication errors, and harm to the residents of the facility. Findings: 1. Record review indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with medical diagnosis including Alcoholic Cirrhosis (A late stage of alcohol-related liver disease that causes the liver to become scarred, swollen, and stiff) according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic). During an interview and observation on 5/13/24 at 9:46 a.m., Resident 3 was in her wheelchair, inside her room, with six cups of medications, with medications inside, sitting on top of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that three of six sampled residents (Resident 78, Resident 33 and Resident 4), who did not participate in social activities, were provided with activities of interest, and supplies to engage in these activities (For resident 78). This failure had the potential to result in boredom, depression and frustration to the residents involved. Findings: Resident 78 Record review indicated Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with medical diagnoses including Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (A nervous system disease that weakens muscles and impacts physical function) and Dysphagia (Difficulty swallowing), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic). During multiple observations since the beginning of the survey, on 5/13/24 at 8:30 a.m., to the end of the survey on 5/17/24 at 3:30 p.m., Resident 78 was not involved in any activities at all. Resident 78 was spending every hour of every day staring at the wall, with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety and functional environment in the kitchen, when cracks and missing tile on the kitchen floor were not repaired. This failure could cause dirt to build up on the floor, attracting cockroaches and rodents, and could cause trips and falls among the kitchen staff. Findings: During an initial observation in the kitchen on 5/13/24, at 8:35 AM, a sunken circular cut on the tile, with dark matter or accumulated dirt along the edges, beside the drain on the contaminated side of the dishwashing section of the kitchen, was noted. During continued observation in the kitchen on 5/13/24, at 8:37 and 8:42 AM, cracks on the floor tile, below the low temperature dishwasher and cracks on floor tiles, by the clean side of the dishwashing section of the kitchen, were noted. During a follow-up visit at the kitchen on 5/14/24, at 11:27 AM, a broken tile on the floor, by the corner of the kitchen center island near the entrance door, was noted. During an interview on 5/14/24, at 11:29 AM, the Maintenance Supervisor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not have a system to track staff compliance in mandatory trainings. This finding had the potential to result in inadequate staff competency to care for the residents, within professional standards or practice, poor quality of care, and harm to the residents of the facility. Findings: During an initial interview with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) on 5/15/24 at 3:12 p.m., she presented a binder, with the in-person training's provided to staff, within the last four months at the facility. These training's included bowel & bladder, urinary tract infections, abuse, pressure injuries, and infection control, among others. The DSD provided the staff sign-in sheets for these training's. The DSD was asked if these trainings were mandatory, to which she responded they were. Some of the sign-in sheets for specific trainings, presented to the Surveyor, included less than twenty staff signatures, while others had more than forty signatures, and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) signed for the majority of these trainings. The DSD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Long-term Care Ombudsman's office of one of three residents sampled for a closed record review, Resident 209, when he was hospitalized . This failure could potentially prevent the Ombudsman from advocating for a vulnerable resident who may require advocacy services. Findings: Review of Resident 209's medical record revealed an admit date of 2/14/24, with medical diagnoses including fracture (break) of shaft of humerus (bone of upper arm) left arm, fracture of shaft of humerus right arm, cognitive communication deficit, and muscle weakness, among others. Resident 209's Progress Notes indicated a note, dated 2/17/24 at 3:15 p.m., Swelling to [left] arm noted to be worse. Increased swelling down arm and increased warmth noted. [Patient] to be sent out. During a record review and concurrent interview on 5/16/24 at 3:37 p.m., the Medical Records Director provided Resident 209's document, Notice of Proposed Transfer / Discharge, dated 2/17/24. When queried, the Medical Records Director stated the form had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure one (1) of twenty-four (24) sampled residents (Resident 78) and one (1) of four (4) discharged residents (Resident 209) had comprehensive care plans developed when: 1. Resident 78 did not have a comprehensive care plan for activities that reflected her admission activities assessment, and; 2. Resident 209 did not have a comprehensive care plan developed for a broken arm. These findings had the potential to result in boredom and frustration for Resident 78, for not participating in her activities of interest. For Resident 209, this finding had the potential to result in inability for staff to care for his broken arm properly, poor quality of care and harm. Findings: 1. Record review indicated Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with medical diagnoses including Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (A nervous system disease that weakens muscles and impacts physical function) and Dysphagia (Difficulty swallowing), according to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess the fall risk of one of three residents sampled for closed record review (Resident 209). This failure could have potentially contributed to Resident 209 falling when his risk level was inaccurate. Finding: During a record review on 5/15/24 at 12:53 p.m., Resident 209's face sheet indicated an admission date of 2/14/24, with medical diagnoses including fracture (break) of shaft of humerus (bone of upper arm) left arm, fracture of shaft of humerus right arm, cognitive communication deficit, and muscle weakness, among others. Resident 209's physician history of present illness note, from his Emergency Department visit on 2/14/24 (prior to his admission), indicated Resident 209 had a right fractured arm in a sling from a fall in January 2024. Review of Resident 209's care plan revealed he did not have a care plan for the fractured arm. Resident 209's admission assessment, dated 2/14/24, did not include the sling or mention the arm fracture. Resident 209's falls risk assessment, dated 2/14/24, indicated he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its Nursing Staff Competency Policy, Facility Assessment Policy and Resident rights Policy, for one sampled Resident (Resident 306), as evidenced by: 1. Licensed Staff B did not have updated annual competencies for Change of Condition assessment and documentation. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 306 not receiving emergency care in a timely manner and for Residents in the facility being potentially at risk due to incompetent staff. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 306's medical record, History and Physical, from the transferring hospital, dated, [DATE], authored by MD 1, indicated, Resident 306 was 79 years-old with medical comorbidities including; Subacute Frontal Lobe Stroke (hypertension (high blood pressure in the blood vessels), atrial (upper chamber of heart) fibrillation (irregular heart beat), pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure in the lungs), pericardial effusion (buildup of extra fluid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and records review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary storage of a resident's portable plastic urinal after use. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of infection and disease transmission from bacteria and other microbes, breeding inside the portable urinal. Findings: During the initial tour and resident interview on 5/13/24, at 10:20 AM, the strong smell of urine in a resident room was noted. Resident 32 occupying Bed C stated he used a portable urinal to urinate in bed and his Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) rinsed his urinal from time to time or occasionally. During a follow-up observation on 5/14/24, at 8:47 AM, Resident 71, occupying bed A in the same resident room, was seated bedside parallel to his bed with his bedside table in front of him. The smell of urine got stronger upon approaching the resident. Resident 71's portable urinal was noted on top of his overbed table beside his drinking mug. During an interview on 5/14/24, at 9:55 AM, the portable urinal of Resident 71 was pointed to Licensed Nurse A (LN A) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep four of five residents' belongings safe in the facility. This failure caused the residents to lose items of sentimental and monetary value, causing the residents to feel upset. Findings: During a confidential group interview on 11/3/21 at 10:30 a.m., four of five confidential Residents stated they had lost personal items. Confidential Resident 1 stated she had lost a pink robe. When asked if the facility replaced the lost items, Confidential Resident 1 stated: Sometimes. Confidential Resident 1 further stated she got a missing item back and it's gone again. She stated she had to go to the laundry lady. Confidential Resident 2 stated he had found his quilt on another resident's bed. He stated he got it back by himself. Confidential Resident 3 stated she lost grey tan sweatpants weeks ago. She stated she was sure she had her label in it. She stated she went to the laundry and felt it was tremendously upsetting. Confidential Resident 4 stated she lost a red 49ers shirt and a burgundy hoodie. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not follow its Grievance policy when: 1) Multiple Confidential Resident's concerns with Resident 109's wandering behavior was not documented on the grievance log and was not investigated per policy; and 2) 4 of 5 Confidential Residents did not know how to file a grievance. These failures contributed to residents being upset, scared, and feeling their privacy had been violated, and potentially prevented facility staff from addressing and resolving resident's concerns. Findings: 1) Review of Resident 109's medical record revealed she was [AGE] years old, was diagnosed with dementia, and had a BIMS score (resident assessment tool) of 3/15 (severe cognitive impairment). Review of Resident 109's care plan (dated 11/7/16; revised 8/31/2021) indicated Resident 109, tends to wander and go into other patients (sic) room . The care plan revealed interventions included various activities and distraction, but did not include staff supervision. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    3. The Department received an anonymous complaint on 11/1/2021 that indicated the facility had sent Resident 49 (who had dementia, lacked decision-making capacity, and was conserved by the Public Guardian's office) unaccompanied to Physician W's office (offsite at a Community Health Center). The complaint indicated Resident 49 traveled to Physician W's office to complete a POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment; written form that tells health care providers want treatments an individual wants during a medical emergency). The complaint indicated when Resident 49 was at Physician W's office, she did not understand the purpose of the appointment and was placed in danger, as she was not provided supervision by the facility staff to and from the appointment. Review of Resident 49's medical record revealed her physician diagnosed her with, unspecified dementia and, cognitive communication deficit. Her physician orders (dated 10/1/2021) indicated Resident 49, does not have the capacity to make health care decisions. Review of Resident 49's medical record revealed a cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-05 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — pattern
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a restful environment for one of three residents sampled for resident-to-resident altercations when Resident 38's roommate, Resident 16, made anxious verbalizations day and night. This failure caused Resident 38 to feel mad, scream at Resident 16, and lose sleep. Findings: Review of Resident 38's facesheet revealed she had an admission date of 12/7/19. Resident 38's MDS (minimum data set, an assessment tool) dated 8/31/21 indicated a BIMS score of 8 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a score of 8 indicates moderate cognitive impairment). Review of Resident 16's facesheet revealed she had an initial admission date of 6/16/15 and a re-admission date of 10/18/17. Resident 16's MDS indicated a BIMS score of 6 (indicates severe cognitive impairment). During an observation and concurrent interview on 11/1/21 at 10:18 a.m., Resident 38 was in her wheelchair in the doorway of her room, facing out into the hallway. Upon greeting her, Resident 38 stated, I'm ignoring someone right now and would not make eye…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to allow one of five residents sampled for activities (Resident 68) go to social activities, which was how she wanted to spend her day. This caused Resident 68 to remain in bed isolated when she would rather be up in the common areas around other people. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 11/1/21 at 4:21 p.m., Resident 68 was in her room in bed. When asked if she got to choose how she spent her day, Resident 68 stated she had not been able to get out of bed for a month. She stated that when she asked to get out of bed, the answer was no. Resident 68 stated she would like to go out in the halls where people are, and would like to go to activities. When queried, Resident 68 stated she liked music and she liked to go to the activities when they have people come play music. During an observation on 11/2/21 at 4:22 p.m., Resident 68 was in bed asleep. Six residents were in the dining room, one was at the piano with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to maintain resident safety when: 1. The facility did not provide a safe and supervised smoking area for one sampled resident (Resident 74) and one unsampled resident (Resident 99); 2. The facility did not provide supervision for one of two residents sampled for accidents, Resident 49, a cognitively impaired and non-verbal resident who was sent to a physician appointment unattended; and 3. The facility did not provide supervision to prevent repeated wandering into other residents' rooms for one of three residents sampled for resident-to-resident altercations (Resident 109); These failures had the potential to cause accidental injuries to residents, including burns or fractures, and could result in a fire in dry, windy weather. The failure to prevent wandering contributed to Resident 109 being kicked by another resident and caused other residents to feel scared and upset. Findings: 1. During an observation, on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to recognize medical changes for 2 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 33 and Resident 7) when: 1a) The staff did not identify Resident 33 had swelling on both legs. This failure had a potential delay of treatment for the underlying cause of swelling. 1b) The staff did not provide continuity of wound care for Resident 33. This failure had a potential delay of wound care which could lead to worsening of wound including wound infection. 1c) The staff did not have a process in identifying acute respiratory changes for Resident 33 who had a chronic cough related to COPD. This failure had a potential delay of respiratory treatment and affect Resident 33's daily routine (Reference F695). 2) Resident 7 had complaint of pain and was not medicated according to her level of pain (Reference F697). Findings: 1a) Resident 33 During an observation and interview with Resident 33 in her room on 11/04/21 at 8:39 a.m., Resident 33 was still in bed finishing up with breakfast, her feet were partially covered with her blanket.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and facility document review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program failed to identify quality deficiencies as evidenced by: 1) Residents were not supervised while smoking, residents did not have smoking care plans developed timely, and the designated smoking area did not contain a fire extinguisher (Cross Reference F689); 2) Resident food preferences were not consistently honored (Cross reference F800); 3) The facility did not develop a policy and procedure for emergency water treatment, storage, monitoring and safe accessing/use of the water (cross reference F880); and 4) Resident grievances were not documented (logged) and investigated per policy (cross reference F585). The failure to identify quality deficiencies potentially prevented the QAPI committee from addressing issues and developing corrective plans of actions to mitigate those areas of concern. Findings: 1) During an interview on 11/1/21 at 12:29 p.m., Resident 41 stated Resident 74 had been caught smoking by staff, He smokes whenever and wherever he wants.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) when: 1. Staff did not wear appropriate mouth, nose, eye protection or isolation gowns when providing care to one resident (Resident 262) who had a medical status that required Infection Control Precautions (a set of standard recommendations used to reduce the risk of transmission of infectious agents from body fluids or environmental surfaces); 2. Health care personnel (HCP) did not remove and discard Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (medical grade supplies used every day by (HCP) to protect themselves, patients, and others when providing care) as appropriate per national guidelines; 3. Reusable treatment equipment, used for multiple residents in the facility, was not cleaned or disinfected per device and disinfectant manufacturer's instructions, prior to use with other residents; 4. Designated/ dedicated medical equipment was not located in the yellow room (designated room(s) in the facility to house newly admitted residents under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to allow one of two residents sampled for choices (Resident 68) go to social activities, which was how she wanted to spend her day. This caused one resident to remain in bed when she would rather be up in the common areas around other people. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 11/1/21 at 4:21 p.m., Resident 68 was in her room in bed. When asked if she got to choose how she spent her day, Resident 68 stated she had not been able to get out of bed for a month. She stated that when she asked to get out of bed, the answer was no. Resident 68 stated she would like to go out in the halls where people are, and would like to go to activities. When queried, Resident 68 stated she liked music and she liked to go to the activities when they had people come play music. During an observation on 11/2/21 at 4:22 p.m., Resident 68 was in bed asleep. Six residents were in the dining room, one was at the piano with a staff member,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess acute respiratory changes for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 33) when Resident 33 had a productive cough and not monitored for symptoms of possible respiratory infection. This failure had a potential delay of respiratory treatment and affect Resident 33's daily routine. Findings: During a clinical record review for Resident 33, the Face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 33 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems). During a clinical record review for Resident 33, the Care Plan for COPD initiated on 8/24/21 indicated interventions to include: monitor for signs and symptoms of acute respiratory insufficiency; monitor/ document/ report to the doctor as needed any symptoms of infection: fever, chills, increase in sputum (document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective pain management for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 7) when: a) Resident 7 reported pain at a level of 8 to 10 using a numerical pain scale (A numerical scale from 0 to 10 based on self-reported data when 0 means no pain; 1-3 means mild pain; 4-7 is considered moderate pain and 8 and above is severe pain) and was given medication for moderate pain. b) Resident 7 reported pain medication given was ineffective on 10/10/21 and 10/22/21 and no additional intervention provided to manage Resident 7's pain. c) The facility did not develop a person-centered care plan incorporating Resident 7's desired level of pain. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 7 experiencing emotional distress by crying and refusing to get out of bed because of severe pain. Findings: During a clinical record review for Resident 7, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 7 was admitted on [DATE]. During a clinical record review for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were labeled, stored and destroyed according to the facility policy and procedure. This failure had the potential to cause residents to receive expired medications. Findings: During an observation on 11/02/21 at 4:06 p.m., in Medication (Med) Cart 1B on station 1, one single Allergy Allegra (a medication is used to relieve allergy symptoms such as watery eyes and runny nose) 60 milligram tablet, with no expiration date, was in drawer 2. Licensed Nurse T validated this observation. During an observation on 11/04/21 at 10:43 a.m., in Med Cart 3, Station 3, One Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray 50 microgram, with expiration date 10/21, was in the top drawer, Licensed Nurse M validated this observation. During an interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) on 11/04/21 at 11:37 a.m., she stated expired medication should not be in the medication cart. The facility policy and procedure titled Medication Storage in the Facility, Storage of Medications, dated 2006, revised August 2014,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the food preferences of two residents were not honored during tray line observation. This failure had the potential to result in decreased intake at meals, and for one resident to not get the extra calories she needed for her healing wound. Findings: During a confidential group interview on 11/3/21 at 10:30 a.m., an anonymous resident stated that sometimes residents' food preferences were not being honored. The resident stated it was hit or miss. During a tray line observation on 11/3/21 at 12:15 p.m., Dietary Staff Y placed a lunch tray on the cart to go out to the residents for lunch. Review of the tray card indicated the resident's dislikes included spinach and squash (zucchini). Zucchini and carrots were on the plate. Informed Dietary Staff Y of the discrepency. Dietary Staff Y handed the plate to the cook, and told her the resident does not like zucchini, and handed the cook the tray card. The cook then made a new plate with just carrots. Continuing the observation of tray line, Dietary Staff Y placed Resident 52's tray on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$9,347 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $9,347 — penalty dated 2026-01-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
FLAGSTONE HEALTHCARE NORTH LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/30/2006
THE ENSIGN GROUP INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/30/2006
SAE, AYNNAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
WILLITS, ADAMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/09/2024
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/01/2006
KEETCH, CHADIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2011
CHG MEDICAL STAFFING, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2001
JACKSON THERAPY PARTNERS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2001
PORT, BARRYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/16/2025
CARETRUST GP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2001
CARETRUST REIT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2001
CTR PARTNERSHIP LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2001
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2002
MOUNTAINVIEW COMMUNITYCARE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2001

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$23.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.2M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 57%Medicare 22%Other / private 21%

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$528per resident / day
operating cost
$16,055per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$584per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056411. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next