No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Turlock Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

1111 E Tuolumne Road, Turlock, CA 95380 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 144 certified beds · (209) 632-7577 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (209) 632-7577 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2026
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
911 E Tuolumne Rd · (209) 668-4104 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
828 Delbon Ave · (209) 634-8511 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2480 Geer Rd · (209) 226-7000 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight13.7%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.4%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.5%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.3%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.5%13.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.2%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.0%10.2%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.8%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.9%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.7%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.232.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.791.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 334 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
86.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.43U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 86.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 158 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.2%CMS range 49.5–61.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.8%CMS range 10.2–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge86.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge87.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge81.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 5.4–10.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.62
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.28
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.89
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
34.9%
Total nursing turnover
45.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 133.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.00 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-06)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-15)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) were safe from physical abuse when Resident 2 struck Resident 1 with a call light (device used to summon staff for assistance, consisting of a long insulated electrical cord with a 1/4 inch metal headphone-type jack on one end, and a bulbous handheld activator button on the other, with a metal clasp to attach to linens or clothing) several times on the head, face, hand, and forearm. This failure resulted in lacerations (cuts in the skin) to the scalp, forehead, cheek, left forearm, and left hand; pain, and bleeding.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) dated 6/18/26, the AR indicated Resident 1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility about three months earlier.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS, a comprehensive, standardized assessment tool), dated 6/8/26, the MDS indicated at Question C0500 a score of 13 out of a possible 15, which indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-06 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure Maintenance Director (MAIND) and Dietary [NAME] (DC) were trained to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services safely and effectively for 136 of 136 residents when:1. MAIND did not sanitize ice bin during cleaning process according to the manufacturer's guidelines.2. DC did not demonstrate correct thermometer calibration during meal preparation.These failures had the potential to place all 136 residents receiving food from the kitchen at risk for cross-contamination (process by which bacteria is transferred from one object or substance to another, with harmful effect) and exposure of foodborne illnesses (a condition where a person becomes sick after consuming contaminated food or beverages. It is caused by the ingestion of harmful microorganisms, such as bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins).Findings:1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/3/2026 at 10:09 a.m. in the kitchen MAIND took the water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices were followed for 136 of 136 residents when:1. A bin containing six bags of stew meat was not labeled with pull-out (a date when items were taken out from the freezer to thaw out in the refrigerator) and use-by date.2. Black and brownish substances were found inside the ice machine.These failures had the potential risk of cross contamination (process by which bacteria is transferred from one object or substance to another, with harmful effect) and exposure of microorganisms (a microscopic organism, especially a bacterium, virus, or fungus) that harbor foodborne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease) from improperly stored and labeled food and could cause foodborne illness (illness that comes from eating contaminated food) to 136 of 136 residents receiving food from the kitchen.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/3/26 at 9:50 a.m. in the walk-in refrigerator, a bin containing six…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of infections for 11 of 23 sampled residents (Resident 143, Resident 46, Resident 53, Resident 154, Resident 39, Resident 109, Resident 70, Resident 20, Resident 149, Resident 5 and Resident 111) when:1. Resident 143 had a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line- a long, thin, flexible tube inserted into a large vein in the upper arm, with its tip near the heart) dressing that was not changed for nine days, was not labeled accurately during a dressing change, and the insertion site was not visible under the transparent dressing after a dressing change. This failure resulted in Resident 143's PICC line dressing not being changed per provider orders or facility policy and procedures which had the potential to result in infection and illness. 2. The facility failed to ensure a commode containing visible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow policy and procedure (P&P) and professional standards of practice to ensure residents were not prescribed unnecessary medications to treat resident's medical symptoms for three of three sampled residents (Resident 13, Resident 49, and Resident 148), when:1. There were no resident-specific Non-pharmacological Interventions (NPI - any intervention intended to improve the health or the well-being of individuals that do not involve the use of any drugs or medicine ) prior to and during administration of antipsychotic (a medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior used to treat a collection of symptoms that affect your ability to tell what's real and what is not) and psychotropic (a drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior) medications for Residents 13, 49 and 148 and Resident 148 had no behavior monitoring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice and facility's policies and procedures (P&P) were followed and implemented for two of 13 residents (Residents 78 and 29) when:1. Resident 78 was not assessed by Licensed Nurses for insidious (gradual unintended weight loss) and significant unintentional weight loss of more than five percent from 2/5/26 to 3/2/26.This failure had the potential for Resident 78 to experience unrecognized decline in health conditions and a delay in implementing nutritional interventions and services.2. Resident 29 maintained and self-administered probiotic (live, beneficial bacteria) capsules and probiotic with fiber gummies supplements at bedside with no physician's order. This failure resulted in Resident 29 self-administering supplements without a physician's order which could lead to inadequate monitoring, duplicate therapy and/or adverse effects.1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/3/26 at 12:34…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY F759 Free of Medication Error Rate of 5% or moreBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not five percent or greater for four of eight sampled residents (Resident 136, Resident 143, Resident 40, and Resident 69), when:1. Resident 136 was administered an 800 mg sevelamer tablet, a medication to be taken with meals, before meals were served.2. Staff did not use the measuring stick provided by manufacturer and did not administer the diclofenac gel dose according to prescriber order for Resident 143. 3. Resident 40 was not administered prescribed dose of sennosides when some crushed medication was left in cup unadministered, and Resident 40 was administered docusate sodium gel tablet with a spoon from his crushed medication cup and Resident 40 the chewed medication instead of swallowing the gel tablet whole.4. Resident 69 was administered blood sugar medication almost 2 hours after blood sugar level was checked.These failures had the potential for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals (a substance such as vaccines or drugs derived from a living organism used for treatment) were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards and practice when:1. The facility failed to ensure medications for one of one Resident (Resident 69's) Inhaler (medications used to treat respiratory disease with a mist or spray that the patient breathes in through the nose or mouth) dispenser was labeled with Resident 69's name and medication expiration date and Resident 69's insulin aspart (a fast-acting form of insulin used to treat high blood sugar) injectable pen was not labeled with the medication expiration date.2. The facility failed to remove discontinued medications from active medications in medication and treatment carts for four of four residents (Resident 19, Resident 45, Resident 57 and Resident 155.These failures had the potential for residents to receive expired and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program that ensured the facility was free of pests for three of six sampled residents (Residents 11, 145, and 147) when ants were observed on Resident 11, 145, and 147's nightstands.This failure resulted in the potential for disease transmission, food contamination, and secondary infections due to ant bites.During a review of Resident 11's Face Sheet (FS - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated 3/5/26, the FS indicated, Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute posthemorrhagic anemia ( a condition where a low number of red blood cells occurs because of significant blood loss), Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy (long-term high blood sugar has damaged multiple nerves, causing pain,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored safely and securely for one of six sampled residents (Resident 29) when Resident 29 had been assessed as not capable of keeping medications at bedside for self-administration and two over the counter (OTC) supplements (probiotic -live, beneficial bacteria) capsules and probiotic with fiber gummies) were found in Resident 29's unlocked bedside table. This failure resulted in Resident 29 self-administering OTC supplements without a physician order, Resident 29's supplements being accessible to residents, visitors and staff and the potential for unintended use. During a review of Resident 29's Face Sheet (FS - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated 3/5/26, the FS indicated, Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure respect and dignity for two of 13 sampled residents (Resident 147 and Resident 40) when:1. Resident 147's lunch tray on 3/3/26 was delivered 24 minutes after all other residents received their meals in the Tuolumne dining room due to his dining location on his meal ticket not being updated for 4 days. 2. Resident 40 gave his lunch tray to Resident 58 and staff did not check residents' lunch trays to ensure all residents received their correct lunch tray at the same timeThis failure resulted in Resident 147 and Resident 40 having to observe other residents eating without being able to participate which led to Resident 147 eating his meal alone and could result in a non-dignified social dining experience with the potential to cause feelings of exclusions or isolation. 1.During a review of Resident 147's admission Record (AR -a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 149) when Resident 149's care plan for Stage 3 pressure ulcers ( a deep, full-thickness skin loss injury where subcutaneous fat is visible, but muscle, tendon, or bone are not exposed) to coccyx ( the last bone at the bottom [base] of your spine) was not implemented.This failure resulted in Resident 149 not receiving necessary care and treatment in promoting wound healing and placed Resident 149 at increased risk of an avoidable worsening of pressure ulcers (areas of damaged skin caused by staying in one position for too long), developing new pressure ulcers and wound infection (an invasion of the body by bacteria or viruses that cause disease).During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/3/26 at 10:47 a.m. with Resident 149, in Resident 149's room, Resident 149 was sitting in a wheelchair watching a program on television. Resident 20 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary care and treatment in promoting wound healing, preventing infection (an invasion of the body by bacteria or viruses that cause disease), developing new pressure ulcers (areas of damaged skin caused by staying in one position for too long) and preventing worsening of existing pressure ulcers were implemented for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 149) when Resident 149 had no pressure relieving device when sitting in a wheelchair and was not repositioned by the nursing staff while sitting in a wheelchair for more than two hours. Resident 149 had a Stage 3 pressure ulcers (is a deep, full-thickness skin loss injury where subcutaneous fat is visible, but muscle, tendon, or bone are not exposed) to coccyx (is the last bone at the bottom [base] of your spine).These failures had placed Resident at increased risk of an avoidable worsening of pressure ulcers, developing new pressure ulcers and wound infection.During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive appropriate services to maintain or improve mobility with the maximum practicable independence for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 35) when Resident 35's Restorative Nursing Program (RNP- a formal, planned and organized program of care which is intended to restore a lost ability or maintain a potentially deteriorating function for a particular resident. RNP is initiated when a resident is discharged from formalized physical, occupational, or speech rehabilitation therapy services) was not developed and implemented after completion and discharge from skilled Occupational Therapy services on 1/30/26.This failure resulted in Resident 35 not receiving RNP to maintain or improve her mobility and placed Resident 3 at an increased risk of decline in range of motion and functional mobility such as transfers and ambulation.Based on concurrent observation and interview on 3/3/26 at 12:03 p.m. with Resident 35, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing information posted for public viewing accurately identified the actual number of Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) providing direct care for each shift. Review of the facility's posted staffing sheets indicated staffing was reported under the categories of Licensed and Unlicensed staff, which combined RN and LVN hours under licensed staff and combined CNA and Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) hours under unlicensed staff.This failure had the potential to affect 136 of 136 residents residing in the facility, as the inaccurate posting of daily nurse staffing information had the potential to prevent residents, visitors and the public from clearly determining the number and type of nursing staff providing direct care in the facility.Findings:During an observation on 3/6/26 at 10:51 a.m. the facility's posted nurse staffing information was observed in a common area accessible to residents and visitors. The posting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors, when one of one resident (Resident 69) was administered the incorrect dose of Dulaglutide (an injectable medication used to improve blood sugar levels in the blood) that was prescribed by the physician from January 27 2026 to March 3 2026, which resulted in continued high blood sugar levels requiring the increase and addition of medications to help regulate Resident 69's blood sugar levels.This failure put Resident 69 at risk of developing hypoglycemia (when the level of glucose [sugar] in the blood drops below the range that is healthy) which had the potential to cause, seizures (a burst of uncontrolled electrical activity between brain cells that causes temporary abnormalities in muscle tone or movements, behaviors, sensations, or states of awareness), confusion (a situation in which people do not understand what is happening, what they should do or who someone or something…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure and maintain complete medical records for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 4) when Resident 4's Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST - a form that contains written medical orders for healthcare professionals regarding specific medical treatments that can or cannot be done at the end-of life) was not signed by the physician. Resident 4's POLST was prepared by qualified staff and signed by Resident 4 on 1/27/26.This failure had the potential for Resident 4 not to receive necessary care and treatment according to her wishes as stated in her POLST during emergency or significant change of conditions.During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/3/26 at 11:50 a.m. with Resident 4, in Resident 4's room, Resident 4 was laying in bed with oxygen on at two liters per minute via nasal cannula (a small plastic tube, which fits into the person's nostrils for providing supplemental oxygen). Resident 4 was awake,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 1's) family member (FM 1) was notified of a significant change of condition when Resident 1 returned to the facility after a seven-day stay in a nearby hospital, and facility staff noted Resident 1 had new areas of skin breakdown, was refusing further skin assessment of this new breakdown, was refusing antibiotics (medication used to treat infections), and refusing to have a blood test as ordered by her physician. This failure resulted in Resident 1's family being unaware of Resident 1's changes in condition upon her return to the facility from the hospital. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) , dated 6/16/25, the AR indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Congestive Heart Failure (chronic condition where the heart doesn't pump blood as efficiently as it should, leading to a buildup of fluid in the body), Chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy on resident possessions when it failed to return belongings to the family of one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when a 42-inch television belonging the Resident 1 was not returned to her family when Resident 1 was discharged from the facility. This failure resulted in Resident 1's family not receiving Resident 1's 42-inch television upon Resident 1's discharge. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) , dated 6/16/25, the AR indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The AR indicated Resident 1 was discharged on 5/2/24. During an interview on 6/17/25, at 3:22 p.m., with Family Member (FM) 1, FM 1 stated Resident 1's family had purchased her a 42-inch television to use while in the facility. FM 1 stated that when Resident 1 was discharged from the facility in May 2025, the 42-inch television was never returned. During an interview on 6/18/25, at 12:35 p.m., with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 2) had bed rails installed as determined by the facility's Bed Rails – Safety Assessment (BRSA) . (The United States Food and Drug Administration's website page, titled, Adult Portable Bed Rail Safety, dated 2/27/23, indicated, Adult portable bed rails are used by many people to help create a supportive and assistive sleeping environment in homes, assisted living facilities and residential care facilities. This type of equipment has many commonly used names, including side rails, bed side rails, half rails, safety rails, bed handles, bed canes, assist bars, grab bars, and adult portable bed rails. [These devices are] intended to assist individuals who are disabled, injured, or recovering from surgery or hospitalized with transfer in and out of bed or repositioning, intended to reduce risk of falling or fracture or mitigate the risk of falling due to the effects of balance disorders or other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the rights of 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 11) were respected and honored when one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 9) displayed an obscene finger gesture toward Resident 11. This failure had the potential for Resident 11 to experience a negative effect to his psychosocial well-being, and, 2. Honor the rights of an unknown number of resident rights by ensuring staff followed their policy and procedure and spoke only English in the facility. This failure had the potential for resident rights to not be honored when an unknown number of residents heard staff speaking a non-English language, and possibly thinking staff were speaking about them. Findings: 1. During a review of the facility document titled, Verification of Incident Investigation / Administrative Summary (VIIAS) , dated 11/25/24, the VIIAS indicated, On 11/21/24 at approximately 4 pm an Admissions staff member reported that she witnessed male CNA flip off [Resident 11] with his middle finger. [Director of Staff Development, or DSD] was notified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely responses to 2 of 5 residents (Resident 6, Resident 7) requests for pain relief when they had to wait over 30 minutes for a nurse to bring them their prescribed pain medication. This failure had the potential for Resident 6 and Resident 7 to have their pain poorly managed, potentially resulting in prolonged pain and discomfort. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/10/24, at 12:42 p.m., with Resident 6, in his room, Resident 6 stated he takes Norco (a strong narcotic pain reliever) for his painful right elbow. Resident 6's right elbow was observed, it was noted to be swollen and red. Resident 6 stated, Sometimes it takes two to three hours to answer my call light. I laid awake all night last night from the pain in my elbow. Last night I was hurting so bad. I got my Norco at 7:30 a.m. this morning. Resident 6 then produced his personal notebook that indicated his handwritten note, indicating he received Norco at 7:30 a.m. that day. During a review of Resident 6's admission Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT- a group of professional individuals involved in the care of the resident) assessed one of 14 sampled resident (Resident 4) on the resident ' s ability to self-administer medications safely and accurately when Resident 4 did not take her six oral medications left by License Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 at the bedside table. This failure had the potential to result of Resident 4 not receiving the correct dose of medications necessary to treat her condition or illness. Findings: During a review of Resident 4 ' s admission Record (AR-documents that contained the resident ' s demographics and medical diagnosis), dated 9/6/24, the AR indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 2020, with diagnoses which included Alzheimer ' s Disease (a progressive disease affecting the brain, altering mood, judgement, and memory); and schizophrenia (mental disorder affecting perceptions of reality). During an observation on 9/5/24, at 12:02 p.m., in Resident 4 ' s room, Resident 4 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Responsible Party (RP- the person who is responsible for paying the patient ' s account bills) of a change of condition for one of 14 sampled resident (Resident 3) when Resident 3 was diagnosed with Urinary Tract Infection (UTI- a bacterial infection that occurs when bacteria enter the urinary tract) and was started on antibiotics (a medication that kills bacteria). This failure resulted for the RP not aware of Resident 3 ' s UTI diagnosis and was not able to make informed decisions and participate with Resident 3 ' s care and treatment. Findings: During a review of review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record (AR-documents that contained the resident ' s demographics and medical diagnosis), dated 9/6/24, the AR indicated, Resident 3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included dementia (a progressive disease affecting the brain, memory, mood, and judgement) and Resident 3 ' s RP for Power of Attorney – Care (a legal document that allows someone to act on another person ' s behalf) was Family Member…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 (Resident #277) of 33 residents for whom MDS assessments were reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #277's 08/02/2024 admission MDS assessment reflected the presence of a nephrostomy tube. Findings included: The CMS Long-Term Care Facility RAI 3.0 User's Manual, revised in 10/2023, revealed, H0100: Appliances, Steps for Assessment: 1. Examine the resident to note the presence of any urinary or bowel appliances. 2. Review the medical record, including bladder and bowel records, for documentation of current or past use of urinary or bowel appliances. Coding Instructions Check next to each appliance that was used at any time in the past 7 days. Select none of the above if none of the appliances A-D were used in the past 7 days. -H0100A, indwelling catheter (including suprapubic catheter and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessments every six months in accordance with a care planned intervention for 1 (Resident #81) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Care Plan, Comprehensive, dated 12/2017, indicated the purpose was To support and guide resident and IDT [interdisciplinary team] collaboration to achieve and maintain optimal resident health, function and quality of life. The Procedure specified, 1. Care Plans are individualized through the identification of resident concerns, unique characteristics, strengths, and individual needs. 2. Care Plans are based on fundamental information gathered by the MDS [Minimum Data Set], CAA's [Care Area Assessments] and information gathered through observation and evaluation. 3. Care Plans become a comprehensive tool for the IDT to utilize as a reference for identified concerns and approaches to establish guidance for meeting resident individual needs. 4, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders requesting psychiatric evaluations for 2 (Residents #81 and Resident #9) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: 1. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #81 on 12/07/2021. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of unspecified psychosis, schizophrenia, and other specified persistent mood disorders. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/30/2024, revealed Resident #81 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. According to the MDS, the resident had verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others and other behavioral symptoms not directed towards others during one to three days of the assessment look-back period and received antipsychotic, antidepressant, and antianxiety medications in the seven days prior to the assessment. Resident #81's care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) document titled Pressure Injury Stages, the facility failed to ensure Nurse Practitioner (NP) #37 followed professional standards of practice for wound staging for 1 (Resident #278) of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers/injury. Specifically, NP #37 reverse staged Resident #278's Stage 4 right heel pressure injury to a Stage 3. Findings included: An NPUAP document titled, Pressure Injury Stages, dated 2018, revealed, Do not Reverse Stage: NPUAP pressure injury staging describes the depth of tissue damage due to pressure. It does not describe healing tissue. Do not reverse stage using NPUAP pressure injury staging. (i.e. [id est; that is]- a Stage 4 pressure injury cannot become a Stage 3, Stage 2, and/or subsequently Stage 1. When a Stage 4 injury has healed it should be classified as a healed Stage 4 pressure injury. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #278 on 04/26/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper incontinence care was provided for 1 (Resident #58) of 3 residents observed during incontinence care. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Perineal Care, dated 2006, revealed the section titled Procedure indicated 11. Female perineal care f. Use one gloved hand to stabilize and separate the labia, with other hand wash from front to back. Rinse and pat dry with towel. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #58 on 06/12/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and palliative care. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/19/2024, revealed Resident #58 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #58 was dependent on staff for toileting and bed mobility and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to reevaluate the appropriateness of continued use of bed rails after a resident attempted to climb over their bed rails and sustained a fall. This deficient practice affected 1 (Resident #23) of 8 residents reviewed for accidents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Proper Use of Bed Rails, dated 10/2022, revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to utilize a person-centered approach when determining the use of bed rails. The policy further indicated, 3. Assess Resident's risk from using bed rails. Examples of the potential risks with the use of bed rails include: a. Accident hazards (e.g. [exempli gratia, for example], falls, entrapment, and other injuries sustained from attempts to climb over, around, between, or through the rails, or over the footboard) and 15. Responsibilities of ongoing monitoring and supervision are specified as follows: a. Direct care staff will be responsible for care and treatment in accordance with the plan of care b. A nurse assigned to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed while providing direct care for 1 (Resident #91) of 6 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and 1 (Resident #54) of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility also failed to ensure staff washed their hands and changed soiled gloves when providing incontinence care, which affected 1 (Resident #58) of 3 residents observed during incontinence care. Findings included: 1. A facility policy titled, Infection Prevention Manual for Long Term Care, revised 10/2022, indicated, Enhanced Standard Precautions, It is facility policy to adopt a comprehensive strategy to prevent, contain, and mitigate multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) in the facility. Enhanced Standard Precautions (ESP) is a core component of this strategy, both during the prevention and mitigation phases. The policy revealed, Identify residents at high risk for MDRO colonization and transmission: the use of ESP, primarily the use of gowns and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the menu approved by the Registered Dietitian (RD) was followed for 131 of 131 residents when the meatloaf portion served to residents was less than 4 ounces (oz-unit of measurements). This failure had the potential for residents to receive the wrong caloric intake and not meet the nutritional needs of the residents which could compromise their medical status. Findings: During a review of the Detailed Census Report, (census), dated 5/21/24, the census indicated there were 134 residents in the facility. During an observation on 5/21/24, at 11:40 AM, in the facility kitchen, [NAME] 1 was cutting a cooked meatloaf into slices for lunch. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/21/24, at 11:42 AM, with the Dietary Manager (DM), the recipe for the meatloaf titled Meatloaf 3 OZ SCR - Recipe #138 (recipe) was reviewed. The DM stated the recipe calls for the portions served to weigh 3 ounces (OZ). During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/21/24, at 11:44 AM, in the facility kitchen, with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was admitted in the facility on 10/3/24 for status post left hemiarthroplasty (a surgical procedure where half of the hip is relaced) and scheduled to have a follow-up appointment with Orthopedic Surgeon (OS- a physician who specialized in treating injuries and diseases of the bones) on 10/26/23. The Facility did not know of the appointment and did not perform a hip xray (a test used to create pictures inside of the body) for Resident 1 to bring for the appointment. This failure resulted for Resident 1 to arrive on his OS appointment without a hip x-ray result and was not assessed by the OS to ensure recovery was proceeding as expected and early detection of potential complications such as hip dislocation, infection, blood clots, and loosening of the joint. Findings: During an interview on 3/19/24, at 8:06 a.m. with the Family Member (FM), the FM stated Resident 1 recently had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0774 — isolated
    Help the resident with transportation to and from laboratory services outside of the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assist in making transportation arrangements for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was scheduled to have an orthopedic surgeon (OS- a physician who specialized in treating injuries and diseases of the bones) appointment on 10/26/23 and the facility did not know of the appointment and did not make prior transportation arrangements from the facility to the OS appointment. This failure resulted in Resident 1's family member (FM) to transport Resident 1 in her private vehicle at the last minute to the OS appointment. Findings: During an interview on 3/19/24, at 8:06 a.m. with the Family Member (FM), the FM stated Resident 1 recently had a surgery on his hip performed by OS and scheduled to have his first follow-up appointment with OS on 10/26/23. The FM stated she arrived at the facility on 10/26/23 to accompany Resident 1 to his orthopedic appointment. The FM stated the facility did not know of the OS appointment and only knew when she arrived and told them. The FM stated the facility did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-09-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and proper sanitary conditions when: 1. The walk-in refrigerator stored expired (past the storage guidelines) vegetables. 2. The ice machine contained yellow substance on the evaporator (part where the ice cubes were formed). 3. The commercial can opener had black particles on the blade. These failures resulted in unsafe food storage that could potentially lead to contamination and foodborne illnesses for residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 9/24/19, at 9:23 a.m., in the kitchen walk-in refrigerator, the walk in refrigerator shelves had several vegetable items that were past their use-by date. There was an unopened bag of shredded cabbage. The DM stated, I think, it is 5 lb. [pound - unit of measure] bag [cabbage]. The DM stated the received date (date received) of the cabbage was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice when: 1. One of two sampled Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN )1 signed Resident 36's electronic medication administration record (e-mar) before administering her medications. This failure had the potential to result in medication errors. 2. The physician order for one of three sampled residents (Resident 8's) insulin (medication to treat high blood sugar) medication was incomplete and did not include the indicated time for the insulin medication administration. This failure had the potential to place Resident 8 at risk for a hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) episodes. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 9/26/19, at 7:34 a.m., LVN 1 prepared Resident 36's medications which included escitalopram (a medication used to treat depression [feelings of persistent sadness over a prolonged period of time]), 5 milligrams (mg- a unit of dry measurement), lisinopril (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) 20 mg and polyethylene glycol (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to accommodate the needs for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 455) when the call light was not within Resident 455's reach. This failure resulted in Resident 455's needs not being met and being unable to reach her call light to ask for help. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 455, on 9/24/19, at 11 a.m., in Resident 455's room, she was seated in her wheelchair a foot away from her bed, in front of the side table. Resident 455 stated, I am sleepy . I want to lay down in bed . I can't reach it (call light). Resident 455 was trying to reach her call light and could not reach her call light. During a concurrent observation and interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2, on 9/24/19, at 11:05 a.m., in Resident 455's room, Resident 455's call light was in the middle of the head of the bed. CNA 2 stated it was not the best place for [Resident 455's] call light. CNA 2 stated, The call light should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to protect the privacy of personal information for one of three sampled residents (Resident 36) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 left the protected health information (PHI) exposed for public view. This failure resulted in the potential for unauthorized access to personal resident information and violated Resident 36's rights to confidentiality. Findings: During an observation on 9/26/19, at 7:27 a.m., in the facility's hallway, the computer on the medication cart was left open and unattended by LVN 1. The computer screen displayed Resident 36's name, photo, room number, allergies and a list of residents prescribed medications visible to everyone who passed by the medication cart out in the hallway. During an interview with LVN 1, on 9/26/19 at 7:39 a.m., LVN 1 stated the computer screen displayed Resident 36's name, photo, room number, allergies and a list of residents prescribed medications visible to everyone who passed by the medication cart out in the hallway. LVN 1 stated the computer screen with Resident 36's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a plan of care to reflect the care needs for one of two sampled residents (Residents 106) with clostridium difficile (c. diff - a bacterium that can cause symptoms ranging from diarrhea to life-threatening inflammation of the colon) when Resident 106 did not have a care plan to direct the care required to address a C-Diff infection of Resident 106. This failure placed Resident 106 at risk of not receiving appropriate, consistent and individualized care to ensure his needs were being met. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3, on 9/24/19, at 10:18 a.m., in the hallway by Resident 106's room, there was a plastic cart with drawers containing personal protective equipment (PPE) by the door. CNA 3 was in the room wearing a gown, mask and gloves. CNA 3 stated Resident 106 had C- diff and was on contact precautions (used to help reduce and/or stop the spread of germs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services for one of three sampled residents in the dining table (Resident 131) when Resident 131 did not receive the needed feeding assistance during her lunch meal. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 131 not meeting her daily nutritional needs, and the potential to result in unplanned weight loss. Findings: During a dining observation on 9/24/19, at 12:15 p.m., Resident 131 sat on her wheelchair around a dining table with her meal placed in front of her. Resident 131 sat at the same dining table where two other residents were eating their meal as Resident 131 watched the other two residents eat. Resident 131 did not make an attempt to pick up utensils and did not begin to eat. Resident 131 sat around the dining table waiting for staff to provide physical assistance with her meal. During an observation on 9/24/19, at 12:30 p.m., Resident 131 sat on her wheelchair and began to fall asleep while the other two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer pain medication at the prescribed time for one of three sampled residents (Resident 37) when Resident 37's pain medication was administered an hour and a half after the scheduled prescribed time. This failure resulted in Resident 37 stating she was crying due to being in pain for over one hour. Findings: During an interview with Resident 37 at the Resident Council meeting, on 9/25/19, at 11:24 a.m., she stated her pain medication was prescribed to be given to her this morning at 7:30 a.m. but it was not administered to her until 10:30 a.m. Resident 37 stated she was in so much pain and she was jerking all over her bed this morning. Resident 37 stated her pain level was an eight out of ten (on numerical pain scale from 0 to 10: 0 means no pain; one to three means mild pain; four to seven moderate pain; eight and above is severe pain) when she finally received her pain medication at 10:30 a.m. Resident 37 stated her pain level was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and implement an effective infection prevention and control program designed to prevent spread of infectious organisms for one of two sampled residents (Resident 509) with known diagnoses of clostridium difficile (C- diff - a bacterium that can cause symptoms ranging from diarrhea to life-threatening inflammation of the colon), when Resident 509 sat in the social dining area, ate next to other residents in the facility and the facility did not implement their infection prevention practices to prevent the potential spread of C-diff infection to other residents in the dining area as indicated on the facility's protocol criteria. This failure had the potential to place other residents at unnecessary risk of exposure to an infectious bacterium (germ). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on, 9/24/19, at 11:13 a.m., a sign was posted outside Resident 509's room indicating,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CHAN, ALEXANDERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025
RICE, CHERYLIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025
PORT, BARRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/26/2018
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/20/2024
KEETCH, CHADIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2011
MONETTE, CORYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/20/2024
SATO, AMIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/20/2024
WILLITS, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/20/2024
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$22.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.4M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 10%Medicare 17%Other / private 73%

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$404per resident / day
operating cost
$12,293per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$451per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555240. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next