Vista Knoll Specialized Care Facility
2000 Westwood Road, Vista, CA 92083 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 119 certified beds · (760) 630-2273 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2019
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.6% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.3% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.1% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.4% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.2% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.5% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.9% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.1% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.2% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.0% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.77 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.64 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
65.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 286 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 156 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.65 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 65.8%CMS range 60.0–71.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 7.4–12.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 66.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 72.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 49.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 91.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 99.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.6%CMS range 6.5–13.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 3) of three residents who required total assistance with activities of daily living (ADL bathing or showering, dressing, getting in and out of bed or a chair, walking, toileting and eating) was free from injury when: 1.There was no documented evidence of fall preventive measures verbalized by facility staff, 2.The at risk for fall care plan was not person centered, 3.admission Record for Resident 3 had an inaccurate diagnosis listed. As a result of this deficient practice, Resident 3 got out of bed unassisted, fell and sustained a nasal fracture and was sent out to the hospital. Findings: On 6/2/26 at 9:30 A.M., an unannounced onsite visit at the facility was conducted related to a report regarding Resident 3's fall with injury. Resident 3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] according to the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 3's hospital history and physical, dated 4/28/26, prior to 5/1/26 admission to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to timely complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated clinical assessment tool) for one of three residents (Resident 3), reviewed for Resident Assessment, as required by Federal regulation S483.20(f)(3). This failure had the potential for a delay in care planning of Resident 3's ongoing clinical problems.Findings: Resident 3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] according to the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 3's hospital history and physical, dated 4/28/26, prior to 5/1/26 admission to the facility, indicated a diagnosis of right femoral neck (flat bone connecting the ball of the hip bone to the thigh bone) fracture from a mechanical fall and dementia. An interview and joint record review on 6/2/26 at 10:30 A.M. with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC-a Registered Nurse who completed the federally mandated clinical assessment tool [MDS] used to evaluate a resident's physical, psychological, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record reviews, the facility failed to provide care timely to Resident 1 when Resident 1 was not changed due to incontinence for one of six residents reviewed. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 1's condition . On 6/8/26 at 10 A.M., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted relative to a complaint related to quality of care On 6/8/26 a record review of Resident 1's record was conducted . Per the Facility's admission Record , Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Dysarthria (a motor speech disorder) following Cerebral Infarction (Ischemic stroke - blood flow to an area of the brain is blocked or significantly reduced) and Hemiplegia (a form of paralysis affecting one side of the body) and Hemiparesis (a partial weakness or the reduced ability to move one entire side of the body ) following Cerebral Infarction affecting dominant side. On 6/8/26 at 10:15 A.M., an observation and interview with Resident 1 was conducted. Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-08 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a call light was working or functioning for one of six residents observed for Physical Environment. As a result, Resident 1's needs was not provided timely. On 6/8/26 at 10 A.M., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted relative to a complaint related to quality of care. On 6/8/26 a record review of Resident 1's record was conducted . Per the Facility's admission Record , Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Dysarthria (a motor speech disorder ) following Cerebral Infarction (Ischemic stroke - blood flow to an area of the brain is blocked or significantly reduced) and Hemiplegia (a form of paralysis affecting one side of the body ) and Hemiparesis (a partial weakness or the reduced ability to move one entire side of the body) following Cerebral Infarction affecting dominant side. On 6/8/26 at 10:15 A.M., an observation and interview with Resident 1 was conducted. Resident 1 stated he had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to replace a damaged low air loss mattress (LAL-mattress used to protect a residents' skin) for one of 27 sampled residents (168).This failure had the potential for Resident 168 to lose sleep during the night and put his skin integrity at risk.Findings:Review of admission Record for Resident 168 indicated he was admitted on [DATE] for diagnoses which included: Congested Heart Failure (a chronic condition where the heart muscle becomes weakened and cannot pump blood effectively), Myocardial Infarction (a condition where blood flow to the heart muscle is blocked, leading to damage or death of heart tissue), and muscle weakness.Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS-a standardized, comprehensive assessment for nursing homes) Section C-Cognitive Patterns indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition (thinking processes).Review of MDS Section GG, Functional Abilities- indicated Resident 168 needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to repair two of 27 residents' (10 & 168) rooms with damaged ceiling and wall .This failure had the potential to affect Resident 10 & 168's overall mood and well-being.Findings:Review of admission Record for Resident 10 indicated he was admitted on [DATE] for diagnoses which included: Pneumonitis (inflammation of the lungs) , Parkinson's Disease (chronic disorder that affects movement, balance, and other bodily functions), and Major Depressive Disorder (mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, loss of interest, and other symptoms that significantly interfere with daily life). Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS-a standardized, comprehensive assessment for nursing homes) Section C-Cognitive Patterns dated 8/22/25, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition (thinking processes).Review of admission Record for Resident 168 indicated he was admitted on [DATE] for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a required resident assessment in a nursing facility) for one of 27 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. (Resident 127) This failure had the potential for Resident 127 to receive inadequate care.According to the current admission Record, Resident 127 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia (a serious mental health condition that affects how people think, feel and behave. It may include hallucinations - seeing or hearing things that aren't there or delusions - a strong fixed belief about things that are untrue).On 9/23/25 at 8:46 A.M. Resident 127 was observed walking in the hallway, and using his four wheel walker. In an interview, he was pleasant, denied pain and spoke clearly. He knew his name, the time and place of where he was, and his situation in the facility. Resident 127 ended the interview by asking where the nearest restroom was, and after stating he knew his room number and where it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately care for a resident's suprapubic catheter (SPC-a surgically inserted tube into the bladder through an incision below the belly button) for one of three residents reviewed for catheter care. (Resident 91) This deficient practice had potential for urinary tract infections (bladder infection) and dislodgement of the SPC.Findings:Resident 91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH- enlarged prostate gland which can press on the tube that carries urine from the bladder to the outside of the body) according to the facility's admission Record. During an observation on 9/24/25 at 7:50 A.M., Resident 91 was lying in bed with a small bag next to Resident 91's right side on the bed. Resident 91 stated it was a bag that drained his urine. A review of Resident 91's physician's orders was conducted. The physician's orders indicated to change SPC as needed when plugged or dislodged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's (MD) orders for tube feeding (TF- uses a flexible tube to deliver liquid food, water, and medicine directly into the stomach) for one of six Residents (Resident 107) reviewed with enteral (refers to any method of feeding that uses the stomach to deliver nutrition and calories) nutrition.As a result, Resident 107 did not receive the full enteral feeding as ordered by the MD with a potential risk for malnutrition.Findings:A review of Resident 107's admission Record indicated Resident 107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included history of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing).A record review of Resident 107's MDS (Minimum data set: nursing facility assessment tool) dated 6/20/25 indicated that Resident 107 was rarely or never understood with severe cognitive (the mental processes that take place in the brain, including thinking,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of one resident reviewed for intravenous (IV- medications administered directly into a vein) antibiotic therapy was provided care according to professional standards when: 1. Resident 129's IV antibiotic was administered three hours late. 2. Resident 129's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC- a peripherally inserted central catheter that provides access to the large vein carrying blood to the heart to administer medication for long-term use) was not measured according to physician's orders. This failure could potentially delay healing, increase the risk of infection and delay the identification of catheter-related complications for Resident 129.Findings: 1. Resident 129 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute osteomyelitis (an infection of the bone), right ankle and foot according to the facility's admission Record. During an observation and interview on 9/23/25 at 9:01 A.M., Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident 7) reviewed for Trauma Informed Care (TIC - an intervention and organization approach that focuses on how trauma may affect an individual's life and his or her response to behavioral health), received care and services in accordance with professional standards when Resident 7's PTSD (Post-traumatic stress disorder - a disorder that may occur in people who have experienced or witnessed a traumatic event) was not identified and addressed by the healthcare providers. This failure resulted in the facility's inability to identify Resident 7's possible triggers that could result in re-traumatization (the reactivation of trauma symptoms via thoughts, memories, or feelings related to past traumatic experiences).Findings: Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including PTSD according to the facility's admission Record. An interview on 9/24/25 at 2:21 P.M. was conducted with Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receiving antipsychotic (medication for mood, behavior, or thinking) medications had an appropriate diagnosis and monitored for side effects (SE) as recommended by the pharmacist for two of five residents (Resident 127 and Resident 16) sampled .These deficient practices placed both residents (Resident 127 and Resident 16) at risk for inappropriate treatment with psychotropic medication and undetected adverse (serious life-threatening SE) drug reactions, which could lead to dizziness, fainting, falls, or other serious complications. 1.According to the current admission Record, Resident 127 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia (a serious mental health condition that affects how people think, feel and behave. It may include hallucinations - seeing or hearing things that aren't there or delusions - a strong fixed belief about things that are untrue). On 9/24/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to clean up trash around the kitchen dumpsters.This failure had the potential to cause rodent and other pest infestations, which in turn could affect infection control.Findings:On 9/24/2025 at 9:08 A.M., a concurrent observation of the trash dumpsters and interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) was conducted. Three facility dumpsters were observed to be locked behind steel fencing. A pinkish-orange substance appearing to be food waste and food wrappers were observed in a two foot by two-foot area between two dumpsters. The DM stated that the expectation is that the area around the dumpsters should be clean with no food waste or debris between dumpsters. The DM stated that this could attract rodents and other pests. On 9/24/25 at 12:45 P.M., a concurrent interview with the Director of Maintenance-(DOM) and observation of pictures of dumpster area was conducted. The DOM stated after a dumpster is emptied, the maintenance workers move the dumpsters, sweep the area, and power wash the area. The DOM stated the expectation is there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain an ordered medication from its contracted pharmacy for one resident (1), who had comfort care (care given to people who are near the end of life) orders. As a result, Resident 1 did not receive the ordered medication to provide comfort prior to his passing (dying). Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute kidney failure (a condition in which the kidneys lose their ability to filter waste from the blood), pneumonia (an infection that affects the lungs), COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, a progressive lung disease that causes breathing problems), heart failure (a condition in which the heart does not pump enough blood for the needs of the body), Parkinson ' s disease (a brain disorder that causes uncontrolled movements such as shaking, stiffness and difficulty with balance), and Alzheimer ' s Disease (a progressive irreversible brain disorder that affects memory, thinking and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure showers were provided as scheduled for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). This failure had the potential to result in poor personal hygiene and decreased psycho-social well-being for Resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic osteomyelitis (bone infection) of the right ankle and foot ulcer (open sore), per the facility's Face Sheet. Resident 1's history and physical, dated 11/7/23, indicated that Resident 1 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time and had the capacity to understand and make decisions. Resident 1's minimum data set (MDS- an assessment tool), dated 11/9/23, indicated Resident 1's brief interview for mental status (BIMS - resident's cognition status) was 12 (8- 12 identified as moderate impaired cognition). The MDS section G indicated Resident 1 needed minimal assistance to complete activities. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident room temperatures were kept at a comfortable and homelike level for one out of 24 sampled residents (87), five unsampled residents (1, 38, 96, 309, 312), and two confidential group residents. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to feel uncomfortable. Findings: A review of Resident 87's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 38's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 96's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 309's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 312's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 8/23/22 at 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 3) was free from unnecessary psychotropic (is any medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior.) medications as per the facility's policy & procedure. * The facility failed to attempt gradual dose reduction (GDR, the stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued.) and no clinical contra-indication was documented. * In addition, the facility failed to implement any non-pharmacological interventions (interventions not involving a medication for mental illness). Resident 3 was receiving several psychotropic including Anti-psychotic (used to manage/treat symptoms of some mental health disorders); Anti-depressant (used to relieve symptoms of depression); Anti-anxiety (used to treat anxiety and panic issues); and Hypnotic (used for the treatment of insomnia which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the clinical records of 14 residents (Residents 311, 151, 310, 309, 308, 48, 307, 306, 305, 304, 303, 302, 81, 96) in rooms A through H were stored in a safe and secure manner when the residents' clinical records were stored on a rolling bookcase in the residential hallway. This deficient practice had the potential for Residents 311, 151, 310, 309, 308, 48, 307, 306, 305, 304, 303, 302, 81, and 96's private health information to become lost, destroyed, or accessed by unauthorized persons. Findings: A review of Resident 311's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 151's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 310's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 309's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 301) was provided privacy during wound care when the resident's privacy curtain was not closed all the way. During Resident 301's wound treatment, the resident's roommate (Resident 88) was brought back to the room by staff. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 301's care and treatment to be observed by other persons, and for the resident to feel embarrassed and undignified. Findings: A review of Resident 301's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include a stage 3 pressure ulcer (injury to the skin that extends into the fatty tissue layer) of the sacral region (area where the lower back and tailbone meet). A review of Resident 301's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 8/18/22, indicated the resident scored 03 on the brief interview of mental status (this meant the resident was severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to two non-sampled residents (Residents 1 & 2) to assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of the residents. * The facility failed to ensure there was a valid physician medication order for Resident 1's morphine (controlled medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) infusion via morphine pump implanted (a surgical procedure performed to permanently implant a pump that delivers morphine to the spinal fluid to treat chronic pain) on 8/3/22. * The facility also failed to ensure Percocet (oxycodone/acetaminophen, controlled medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) tablets taken out of the Resident 1's controlled drug records (CDR) were administered to Resident 1 and documented on the medication administration record (MAR). * In addition, the facility failed to ensure Resident 2's Dulera (a combination of mometasone furoate and formoterol fumarate, used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) failed to report irregularities in Resident 2's Dulera inhaler (a combination of mometasone furoate and formoterol fumarate, used to prevent and lessen asthma symptoms) to the attending physician, Director of nursing and/or medical director and the facility administrator. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: On 8/24/22 at 9:40 A.M., during an observation on Unit 1 with LN 2, the medication cart was inspected. Resident 2's Dulera inhaler was observed in the medication cart, labeled to inhale 1 puff every 4 hours as needed for asthma. On 8/24/22 at 9:50 A.M., during Resident 2's record review, the medication order showed Dulera inhaler, 1 puff inhale orally every 4 hours as needed for asthma ordered on 3/28/22. During an interview on 8/25/22 at 12:55 P.M., the CP stated her record showed Resident 2's Dulera inhaler order was 1 puff twice a day. The CP also stated she downloaded residents' medication orders from the facility dispensing pharmacy. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored as per the facility's P&P and outdated medications were not available for residents' use. * Multiple expired medications observed in Unit 1 and Unit 2. * The opened Tuberculin PPD 1 ml vial (purified protein derivative, a multi-dose injectable solution used in skin test to determine if a patient has tuberculosis) was not labeled with the open date and was stored in the refrigerator in Unit 2 locked medication room. These failures had the potential to result in unsafe administration of medications to the residents and posed the risk of the test not showing an accurate result when determining if a resident had tuberculosis. Findings: 1. On 8/23/22 at 11:00 A.M., an inspection of house supply Medication Room in Unit 2 was conducted with LN 3. The following outdated medications were observed: Adult tussin expectorant (guaifenesin 200 mg/10 ml, used to clear mucus from the chest) 118 ml expired on 3/22 x 1 bottle. Famotidine 20 mg tablet (used to treat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appetizing and palatable temperature for two of 15 confidential group residents and during a meal test tray observation. This failure had the potential for residents not to enjoy their food. Findings: On 8/24/22 at 10:03 A.M., a confidential resident group meeting was conducted. Two out of 15 confidential residents stated that their food was not palatable because the hot food was not served hot and the cold food was not served cold. On 8/25/22 at 11:30 A.M. an observation was conducted in the facility's kitchen of the lunch time food service. At 12:33 P.M., the food was observed being placed on resident trays for Unit 2. At 1:31 P.M., the last food cart was brought to Unit 2. On 8/25/22 at 1:36 P.M., the last tray on the food cart on Unit 2 was tested. The director of dietetic services (DDS) 2, using the facility's thermometer, tested the temperatures of the food and drink items on the test tray. The facility's registered dietitian (RD) was also present. The DDS 2 tested the food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-26 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 2 sampled residents, Resident 81, received a selected lunch meal and a chosen lunch entree. This deficient practice had the potential to result in weight loss and further compromise the resident's medical status. Findings: Per the facility's admission record, Resident 81 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including surgery on the nervous system, and traumatic subdural hemorrhage (bleeding inside the skull after an injury). On 8/23/22 at 2:35 P.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 81. Resident 81 stated, I did not get my lunch yesterday. Resident 81 further stated, The CNA said she did not see a tray for me. Someone called the kitchen and came back with a sandwich and a bag of chips. Resident 81 stated, I didn't get what I wanted, instead I ate a sandwich for lunch. On 8/24/22 at 1:20 P.M., during a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 81, Resident 81 was observed lifting the lid off the plate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with food safety standards, when: - Spoiled produce was stored among non-spoiled produce. - Dented cans were stored among non-dented cans and were in circulation to be used. These deficient practices had the potential for residents to be exposed to the risk of foodborne illness. Findings: On 8/23/22 at 8:30 A.M., an observation of the facility's kitchen was conducted with the director of dietetic services (DDS) 1. The walk-in produce refrigerator was inspected. There was a large box of romaine lettuce heads. In the box, approximately five heads had large brown spots on the leaves, fuzzy gray material on the leaves, and they were secreting a slimy substance onto the other heads of lettuce that were in the box. The DDS 1 stated the whole box should have been tossed out. In the dry storage area, there was an onion that was soft and squishy and a banana that was black and slippery and leaked a gray fluid. The DDS 1 stated that spoiled produce should not have been stored with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-03-04 · tag F0685 — patternAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 residents (43, 98) with hearing loss received the necessary services. This failure had the potential to decrease the quality of life for these two residents and could have caused communication breakdown between the residents and the staff. Findings: 1. Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's admission Record. An observation of Resident 43 was conducted on 2/25/19 at 12:22 P.M. Resident 43 was sitting on her bed and the TV was on. Resident 43 stated she could not hear well and needed people to speak up, and did not have hearing aides. Resident 43 further stated that she did not attend many activities because she could not hear well. An interview was conducted with CNA 30 on 2/27/19 at 8:08 A.M. CNA 30 stated that Resident 43 had a hearing problem and needed staff to speak in a loud voice or use gestures. CNA 30 stated she did not know if Resident 43 had hearing aides. A concurrent interview and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow required standards related to the cool down process (a method to decrease the temperature within a required timeframe) for a potentially hazardous food (foods that require time and/or temperature control to prevent bacterial growth). As a result, there was a potential for food borne illness for 99 of 105 residents. Findings: On 2/27/19 at 10:45 A.M., a record review was conducted of the facility's Cool Down Log. A ham was cooked on 2/17/19 with the second phase of the cool down process which started at 11 A.M. and ended at 4 P.M., (five hours later). On 2/27/19 at 11:13 A.M., an interview was conducted with DS 1. DS 1 stated she was the one responsible for cooling down the ham. DS 1 further stated it should have been checked at 3 P.M. DS 1 stated she went on a break at 3 P.M. that day and forgot to check the temperature of the ham, and no one else checked the temperature. DS 1 stated it was important to check the temperature at the right time to ensure bacteria did not grow. DS 1 stated they still had the ham in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3b. Resident 68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Huntington's Disease (a progressive brain disorder that causes uncontrolled movements, emotional problems,and loss of thinking) and bipolar disorder (extreme mood swings which ranged from depression to mania). On 2/27/19 at 10:59 A.M., an observation was conducted of LN 2. LN 2 brought a pitcher of water from the medication cart to Resident 68's bedside table. LN 2 poured the water from the pitcher into a cup for the tube feeding and medication administration. LN 2 returned the pitcher of water to the medication cart and used the pitcher of water for other residents. On 2/28/19 at 9:48 A.M., an interview with the DSD/ICN was conducted. The DSD/ICN stated LN 2 should not have taken the pitcher inside Resident 68's room to avoid contamination and transmission of germs to other residents. On 3/4/19 at 11:30 A.M., an interview with the DON was conducted. The DON stated the pitcher should not have been taken into Resident 68's room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident 30) was protected from exploitation and misappropriation of funds. This failure placed Resident 30 at further risk of abuse. Findings: Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a chronic, disabling, and severe mental disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly; a disconnection from reality); anti-social personality disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by a disregard for other people's rights; lack of regard for their own safety, inflated and arrogant self-appraisal; and irresponsible in sexual relationships); and traumatic brain injury (brain dysfunction caused by an outside force, usually a violent blow to the head that disrupts the normal function of the brain), per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 30's medical record indicated Resident 30 was conserved (a court appointed adult who makes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of funds to the state agency for one residents (30). This failure had the potential to have placed Resident 30 at further risk of abuse. Findings: Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a chronic, disabling, and severe mental disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly; a disconnection from reality); anti-social personality disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by a disregard for other peoples rights; lack of regard for their own safety inflated and arrogant self-appraisal; and irresponsible in sexual relationships); and traumatic brain injury (brain dysfunction caused by an outside force, usually a violent blow to the head that disrupts the normal function of the brain) per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 30's medical record indicated Resident 30 was conserved (a court appointed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for one resident (30). This failure placed Resident 30 and other residents at risk of abuse due to the facility's incomplete investigation. Findings: Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a chronic, disabling, and severe mental disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly; a disconnection from reality); anti-social personality disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by a disregard for other peoples rights; lack of regard for their own safety inflated and arrogant self-appraisal; and irresponsible in sexual relationships); and traumatic brain injury (brain dysfunction caused by an outside force, usually a violent blow to the head that disrupts the normal function of the brain) per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 30's medical record indicated Resident 30 was conserved (a court…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain or improve one of one sampled resident (13) with limited ability to sit upright. This failure had the potential to result in decline of Resident 13's ability to sit upright. Findings: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's (progressive disease of the nervous system), intracranial injury (an external force injures the brain), cervicalgia (injury to the neck), per the facility's admission Record. On 2/25/19 at 11:25 A.M., 2/26/19 at 12:20 P.M. and 2/27/19 at 8:24 A.M., observations of Resident 13 were conducted. Resident 13 was observed sitting in a geriatric chair (a large padded chair with wheeled bases, designed to assist residents with limited mobility) outside of the nursing station. Resident 13 was leaning over to the right with his head dangling to the right, drooling down the side of his mouth. On 2/27/19 at 9:14 A.M., an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of one sampled resident (13) remained free of injury from an accident hazard when they failed to identify the vinyl covering of a geriatric chair were torn, stiff and hard. This failure placed Resident 13 at risk to develop skin tears. Findings: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's (progressive disease of the nervous system), intracranial injury (an external force injures the brain), cervicalgia (injury to the neck), per the facility's admission Record. On 2/27/19 at 9:20 A.M., a joint observation and interview was conducted with LN 2 related to Resident 13's geriatric chair. Resident 13's geriatric chair had no vinyl covering over the right and left armrests, and the cushion below the right armrest was exposed. The vinyl pieces of the armrests were stiff and hard. On 2/27/19 at 9:45 A.M., an interview was conducted with LN 2. LN 2 stated the hard and sharp vinyl tears…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was provided per the physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents (13) reviewed for oxygen therapy. In addition, a physician's order did not have an indication for use related to oxygen administration for 1 of 3 sampled residents (404). This failure had the potential for residents to experience low oxygen saturation (amount of oxygen in the blood) levels which could lead to shortness of breath and/or respiratory distress. Findings: 1. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's (progressive disease of the nervous system) and gastrostomy tube (feeding tube located in the stomach), per the facility's admission Record. On 2/27/19 at 9:20 A.M., an observation of Resident 13 was conducted. Resident 13 was constantly coughing and restlessness. LN 2 administered a bolus (a large volume of fluid given at one time) of tube feeding to Resident 13. During the tube feeding, Resident 13…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-04 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a hospice agency's prospective visit calendar was present in the clinical record for one of three hospice residents (54). As a result, there was a potential for delayed or uncoordinated care between the facility healthcare team and the hospice agency. Findings: Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encounter for palliative care (specialized care for people living with a serious illness), per the facility's admission Record. On 2/27/19 at 9:25 A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with LN 2. LN 2 reviewed Resident 54's medical record and was unable to find a hospice agency calendar for February 2019. On 3/4/19 at 8:31 A.M., an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON was unsure if a monthly calendar was required to be part of a patients record, but stated if it was required she would have expected the hospice agency to have made the visit calendar available in the patients chart. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 3.2 | +1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLAGSTONE HEALTHCARE SOUTH LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/30/2006 |
| THE ENSIGN GROUP INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 10/01/2003 |
| BAROUDI, SAM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/12/2016 |
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/02/2014 |
| GARDNER, CLAYTON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/22/2025 |
| WILLITS, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/30/2019 |
| KEETCH, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2011 |
| ELITE WORK FINDERS INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/01/2003 |
| PORT, BARRY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/22/2025 |
| ENSIGN SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2003 |
| OHI ASSET (CA), LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2003 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555425. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.