Northbrook Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 80 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.66 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 38.3 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.52 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.21 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-03-05 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 1) of four sampled residents was free from physical abuse when two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) intentionally held down Resident 1 against his will while performing perineal care (the cleaning and maintenance of the genital and anal areas). This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling belittled and upset. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of pleural effusion (abnormal buildup of fluid between the lungs and the chest wall). A review of a care plan, initiated on 2/19/25, indicated Resident 1 had an activities of daily living self care performance deficit related to generalized weakness. In order to assist Resident 1 to safely perform grooming, toilet use, and personal hygiene, staff were to conduct the following interventions, [For] toilet use .[Resident 1] requires assistance to .clean self, transfer onto toilet, transfer off toilet,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that food was prepared by methods that preserved nutrition and palatability when three residents (Resident 20, Resident 26, Resident 30) out of 38 residents received meals that were flavorless, difficult to chew and overcooked.This failure decreased the facility's potential to serve food to residents with nutritive content and decreased the residents' potential to maintain or increase their meal intake with food served by the kitchen.Findings:During a concurrent interview and observation in Resident 26's room on 1/28/26at 8:30 a.m., Resident 26 complained about the potatoes he was served for breakfast. The cubed potatoes noted on his plate were pale in color. Resident 26 stated the potatoes were too difficult for him to chew because the potatoes were still raw in the center. Resident 26 was observed trying to cut one of the cubed potatoes with a fork and was noted to have difficulty doing so. Resident 26 stated the potatoes served in this fashion were usually hard and were inedible. Resident 26 further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared and served safely in accordance with professional standards of food service when:Clean plastic cups were stored in soiled, heavily scratched plastic racks and food crumbs were observed under a layer of dirty plastic netting which clean eating utensils were stored on top of in a utensil tray; and,The front of the facility stove was stained with old grease drippings while the stovetop was encrusted with hardened black residue; and,Cook 1 failed to maintain proper hand hygiene during meal prep and trayline when he repeatedly contaminated his gloves by touching his personal clothing and other kitchen items before handling food products; and,Refrigerated items found with no use by date.These failures posed the risk for food borne illness for 38 residents for a census of 38 residents that resided in the facility and consumed food prepared in the kitchen.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview in the facility kitchen on 1/27/26 at 9:56 a.m., clean plastic cups…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an environment free of pests for 38 residents for a census of 38 when two flies were observed in the kitchen during food preparation.This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent foodborne illnesses among residents.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview in the kitchen on 1/28/26 at 10:55 a.m., two flies were observed flying around the area where lunch was being prepared. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) confirmed the presence of flies in the kitchen. The CDM stated the flies may have come in with someone when they entered the building from the outside. There was no electronic air curtain noted upon entry to the facility.A review of the facility's policy titled Pest Control, dated February 2025, indicated, It is the policy of this facility to utilize pesticides.in a safe and efficient manner to control pests.The following are guidelines for pest prevention.All storage and food preparation areas are to be kept clean. This includes.equipment.A review of the FDA 2022 Food Code…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food preferences were honored for four residents (Resident 10, Resident 30, Resident 41, Resident 26) of 38 sampled residents when the residents were served meals which contained food they disliked.This failure decreased the facility's potential to serve food that met residents' nutritional needs.Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview in the facility dining room on 1/27/26 at 12:31 p.m., Resident 10 and Resident 41 were eating their lunches. This surveyor observed both residents' plates contained untouched peas. Resident 10 stated she did not like peas and Resident 41 stated she had never liked peas and was confused as to why they were placed on her tray. A review of their meal tray tickets indicated both Resident 10 and Resident 41 disliked peas. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/27/26 at 1:09 p.m., Resident 30 was eating lunch in her room. Resident 30 stated, I will not eat the peas they served…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for two residents (Resident 20, Resident 21) of four sampled residents when Licensed Nurses (LN) did not:Initiate a care plan for Resident 20's need for oxygen therapy; and,Implement interventions indicated in Resident 21's care plan regarding the risk of skin impairment.These failures decreased the facility's potential to communicate Resident 20's care needs regarding oxygen therapy among facility staff and resulted in Resident 21 sustaining a wound to her left lateral (a side of the body positioned away from midline) upper calf.Findings:1. A review of Resident 20's admission record indicated admission to the facility on 1/1/26 with a diagnosis of Heart Failure (a chronic disease where the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs, often causing fluid buildup in the lungs or body).A review of Resident 20's physician orders dated 1/1/26, indicated, O2 [oxygen] 1 LPM [Liters per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 3) of four sampled residents was properly groomed and had her call light within reach when Resident 3 was observed to have uncombed hair, dirty fingernails, and fecal matter (bowel movement) on her pillowcase, sheets and bedside table, and had no way to call for assistance.This deficiency decreased the facility' potential to ensure Resident 3 received personal care to maintain adequate hygiene.Findings:A review of Resident 3's admission record indicated admission on [DATE] with diagnoses of esophageal obstruction (blockage of the tube leading from the throat to the stomach), need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, and repeated falls. A review of Resident 3's care plan, initiated on 10/1/25, indicated Resident 3 was at risk for falls. Staff were expected to Be sure the call light is within reach and encourage to use it to call for assistance as needed to decrease her risk of falling.A review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was clean and in a usable state for one resident (Resident 20) out of four sampled residents when in Resident 20's oxygen concentrator had visible dust and debris in the vents.This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent bacteria and debris from directly entering Resident 20's lungs, placing her at risk for infection.Findings:A review of Resident 20's admission record indicated Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Heart Failure (a chronic disease where the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs, often causing fluid buildup in the lungs or body).A review of Resident 20's physician orders dated 1/1/26, indicated, O2 [oxygen] 1 LPM [Liters per minute-indicates how much oxygen will be delivered per minute] via NC [nasal cannula-a flexible device used to deliver oxygen through the nose].A review of Resident 20's MDS (Minimum Data Set- a federally…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medications as ordered by the prescriber, when two residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) of three sampled residents received their medications late on two days.This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent serious health consequences including worsening symptoms, disease progression, and increased risk of complications.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission record, dated 12/19/25, indicated Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses that included trigeminal neuralgia (a chronic pain condition causing sudden, severe, electric shock-like pain in the face, affecting the trigeminal nerve) and syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (a condition that causes excessive water retention in the kidneys).During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/20/25 at 3:10 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1's Medication Admin Audit Reports dated 12/20/25-12/21/25 were reviewed. The report indicated Resident 1 had the following medications scheduled for 12/20/25 and 12/21/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of 5 percent (%) or less. There were 3 errors out of 43 opportunities, which resulted in a medication error rate of 6.98 % for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #4) of 5 residents observed during medication administration. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Administration Procedures For All Medications, dated 05/2022, indicated, C. Review 5 Rights (3) times: 1) Prior to removing the medication package/container from the cart/drawer; a. Check MAR/TAR [medication administration record/treatment administration record] for order. b. Note any allergies or contraindications the resident may have prior to drug administration. c. If unfamiliar with the medication, consult a drug reference, manufacturer package insert, or pharmacist for more information. d. Check for vital signs, other tests to be done during/prior to medication administration. e. Prepare resident for medication administration. 2) Prior to removing the medication from the container a. Check…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication administration records accurately reflected the medications administered for 1 (Resident #27) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. In addition, the facility failed to ensure medication orders were correctly transcribed into the electronic health record (EHR) for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 residents observed during medication administration. Findings included: 1. A facility policy titled, Administration Procedures for All Medications dated 05/2022, revealed, J. After administration, return to the cart, replace medication container (if multi-dose and doses remain), and document administration in the MAR [Medication Administration Record] or TAR [Treatment Administration Record]. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #27 on 01/17/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of gout and chronic kidney disease. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,295 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,295 — penalty dated 2025-03-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $575K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA