Hampden Hills Post Acute
14699 E Hampden Ave, Aurora, CO 80014 · For profit - Corporation · 218 certified beds · (303) 693-0111 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (23% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2023
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.2% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.0% | 4.7% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.7% | 1.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.6% | 8.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.3% | 13.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 5.4% | 11.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.5% | 94.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.0% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.2% | 21.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.4% | 20.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.6% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 72.6% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.2% | 20.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.5% | 12.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.17 | 1.38 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.17 | 1.74 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 65 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.3%CMS range 32.6–54.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 6.6–12.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 67.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 93.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.6%CMS range 3.0–10.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 218 beds and averages 202.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodation of needs for residents on one of two floors. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents on the second floor received functional utensils for meals to achieve their highest practicable level of well-being. Findings include: I. Observations During a continuous observation of the second floor dining room on 1/14/25, beginning at 4:20 p.m. and ending at 5:45 p.m, the following was observed:. At 4:20 p.m. residents waited in the dining room for dinner service. At 5:00 p.m. the food was brought up to the dining room kitchenette from the first floor kitchen At 5:06 p.m. staff began to serve food onto paper plates for the residents. Residents were provided plastic utensils and styrofoam cups. The meal was chicken fried steak, brown gravy, mashed potatoes, baby carrots and tapioca pudding. Four residents at the first table in the dining room were served dinner. One resident at the table tried to use her plastic knife and fork to cut the chicken fried steak but she was unable to. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure prompt action was taken upon the filing of a grievance of a group. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident complaints expressed during the resident council meetings were documented on a grievance and resolved to the residents satisfaction. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Residents Rights, Subject: Grievances policy and procedure, revised January 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/16/25 at 9:28 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, The facility will establish a grievance process to address resident concerns without fear of discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished, the behavior of staff and of other residents; and other concerns regarding their facility stay; and the facility will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances the residents may have. The facility's grievance official is responsible for overseeing the grievance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary homelike environment for residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided clean washcloths and hand towels. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Safe and Homelike Environment policy, revised November 2024, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/16/25 at 9:22 p.m. It read in pertinent part, In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, allowing the residents to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible. This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk. The characteristics of the homelike environment are a clean, sanitary, orderly environment. Housekeeping and maintenance services will be provided as necessary to maintain a sanitary,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#23, #34 and #21) of four residents reviewed for activities out of 59 sample residents received an ongoing program of activities designed to meet needs and interests and promote physical, medical and psychosocial well-being. Specifically the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #23 and Resident #34 were offered more mind stimulating activities; and, -Ensure Resident #21 was provided with a personalized activity program. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Quality of Life policy, updated December 2024, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/16/25 at 9:26 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that activities are available to meet resident needs and interests that support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of the resident. The Activities policy and procedure, revised December 2024, was provided by the NHA on 1/16/25 at 9:37 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed to meet the resident's nutritional needs. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Follow the correct portion sizes to ensure adequate nutrition was provided to the residents; and, -Follow the weekly menu to ensure adequate nutrition was provided to the residents. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Food and Nutrition Services, Menus policy, dated August 2019, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/16/25 at 9:28 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, This facility's menus and extensions shall be prepared in advance. Menus procedures: If any meal served varies from the planned menu, the change and the reason for the change are noted in the kitchen and /or in the record book used solely for recording such changes; these changes are to be reviewed and approved by the dietitian. Menu spreadsheets are utilized to ensure all menu items are served at the correct portion sizes. II. Failure to follow the correct portion sizes to ensure adequate nutrition was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control programs (IPCP) were maintained and followed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff wore the proper personal protective equipment (EBP) for Resident #25, who was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP); -Ensure pull cords were free from debris; -Ensure the resident's rooms were cleaned appropriately; and -Ensure Resident #98's nebulizer was cleaned and stored appropriately. Findings include: I. Failure to follow enhanced barrier precautions A. Professional reference According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs) (4/2/24), retrieved on 1/22/25 from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the dining room tables were stable and in good condition. Findings included: I. Facility policy and procedure The Safe and Homelike Environment policy, revised November 2023, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/16/25 at 7:00 p.m. It read in pertinent part, In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible. This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk. A. Observations and resident interviews On 1/15/25 at 12:45 p.m., there were five dining room tables that were found to be unbalanced. When a resident leaned on the table the table top dipped causing the surface to move up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the resident the right to make choices about aspects of his life in the facility that are significant to the resident related to left leg prosthetics for one (#55) of one resident out of 59 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to honor Resident #55's requests to be fitted and provided with a left leg prosthetic which he had prior to being admitted to the facility. Findings include: I. Resident #55 A. Resident status Resident #55, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the January 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included bipolar disorder (mental illness that causes shifts in a person's behaviors), current episode of depression and acquired absence of left leg above the knee. The 11/19/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. The resident required set up assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the minimum data set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected residents' status based on the criteria outlined in the resident assessment instrument (RAI) for one (#99) of one resident out of 59 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessments for Resident #99 accurately documented that the resident had a preadmission assessment screening and resident review (PASRR) Level II qualifying diagnosis. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the American Association of Post-Acute Care Nursing (AAPACN) The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Process (October 2024), retrieved on 1/29/25 from https://www.aapacn.org/resources/rai-manual/, The RAI helps nursing home staff in gathering definitive information on a resident's strengths and needs, which must be addressed in an individualized care plan. Interdisciplinary use of the RAI promotes this emphasis on quality of care and quality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to incorporate recommendations from the preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) level II determination and evaluation from the State Mental Health Agency in the case of residents with serious mental illness or a related condition for one (#47) of two residents reviewed for PASRR out of 59 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to arrange and incorporate recommendations from the PASRR level II notice of determination for Resident #47. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #47, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the January 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included Down's syndrome and major depressive disorder. The 12/24/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. The assessment revealed the resident had been identified as having a level II PASRR. II. Resident interview Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the services provided or arranged by the facility met professional standards of quality two (#69 and #23) of two residents of 59 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Follow manufacturer's directions when administering Trulicity (insulin) for Resident #69; and, -Have accurate medication orders for Resident's #69 and #23 Trulicity injections. Findings include: A. Professional reference According to the [NAME] Lilly Manufacturer's Trulicity Injection, Instructions for Use, last revised November 2024, retrieved on 1/25/25 from https://uspl.lilly.com/trulicity/trulicity.html#ug Administration of Trulicity injection pen should be held flat on the skin, press and hold the green injection button. You will hear a loud click. Continue holding the clear base firmly against your skin until you hear a second click. This happens when the needle starts retracting in about five to 10 seconds. Every dose of Trulicity comes in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY III. Resident #34 A. Resident status Resident #34, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the January 2025 (CPO), diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (MS). The 10/1/24 MDS assessment revealed the resident had minimal cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 13 out of 15. The resident required partial assistance with oral hygiene and total assistance with repositioning. B. Failed to provide oral care 1. Resident interview and observation Resident #34 was interviewed on 1/13/25 at 1:42 p.m. Resident #34 said she had not had her teeth brushed for some time. She said she needed to tell the staff to brush her teeth because they did not help her. The resident had foul smelling breath and a white substance visible on her upper teeth. Resident #34 was interviewed a second time on 1/15/25 at 10:08 a.m. Resident #34 said she had not had her teeth brushed. She continued to have foul smelling breath and the white substance was still visible on her upper teeth. On 1/15/25 at 10:24 a.m. CNA #3 brushed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper treatment and assistive device to maintain hearing abilities for one (#138) of three residents reviewed for hearing and vision services out of 59 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide a hearing exam for Resident #138 when requested Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Hearing policy, revised April 2024, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/16/25 at 7:00 p.m. It read in pertinent part It is the policy of this facility to ensure that all residents have access to hearing and vision services and receive adaptive equipment as indicated. The facility will utilize the comprehensive assessment process for identifying and assessing a resident's vision and hearing abilities in order to provide person-centered care. This process includes: obtaining history from medical records, the family, and the resident regarding hearing and vision abilities, MDS (minimum data set)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who displayed or was diagnosed with dementia, received the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for two (#72 and #80) of eight out of 59 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to -Develop and implement effective dementia management focused interventions to prevent Resident #72 from wandering into other resident's rooms; -Develop person centered interventions to communicate with Resident #72 and #80; and, -Reassess the effectiveness of care-plan intervention and adjust intervention approaches based on behaviors for Resident #72 and #80. Findings include: I. Resident #72 A. Resident status Resident #72, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the January 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included unspecified dementia with agitation and mood disorder. The 11/7/24 minimum data set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to assist residents to obtain routine or emergency dental services, as needed, for two (#60 and #23) of two residents out of 59 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Follow up on a social services referral for denture replacements for Resident #60; and, -Place a timely referral for dental services for Resident #23. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Dental Policy, revised October 2024, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/16/25 at 7:00 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility, in accordance with residents' needs, to promptly assist residents in obtaining routine (to the extent covered under the State plan) and emergency dental care. Routine dental services means an annual inspection of the oral cavity for signs of disease, diagnosis of dental disease, dental radiographs as needed, dental cleaning, fillings (new and repairs), minor partial or full denture…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide accessible dining equipment and utensils for residents who need them for one (#172) of one resident reviewed for adaptive equipment out of 59 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide adaptive drinking equipment for Resident #172. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Adaptive Equipment policy and procedure, revised October 2024, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/16/25 at 9:22 p.m. It read in pertinent part It is the policy of the facility to evaluate and provide adaptive equipment for residents who have been identified at risk for contractures, skin breakdown, assisting with eating. On admission the resident will be assessed for needs for adaptive devices. Residents needing adaptive equipment will be screened by therapy or nursing and equipment will be supplied for respective residents Residents will be reassessed quarterly for continued needs of the adaptive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure specialized rehabilitative services to maintain highest practicable level of functioning for one (#158) of two residents reviewed for specialized rehabilitative services out of 59 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure services for Residents #158 were provided to maintain the residents highest practicable levels of functioning. Findings include: I. Resident #158 A. Resident status Resident #158, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the January 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included stroke, polyneuropathy and adult failure to thrive. The 11/20/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of six out of 15. He required extensive assistance for bed mobility, repositioning, bathing, dressing, transferring and toilet use. Staff provided only set up assistance for meals. The MDS assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (#7) of three residents out of seven sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow a clean technique when providing wound and incontinence care for Resident #7. Findings include: A. Professional reference According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) When and How to Wear Gloves (1/8/21), retrieved on 12/15/23 from https://www.cdc.gov/handhygiene/providers/index.html, Wear gloves, according to standard precautions, when it can be reasonably anticipated that contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials, mucous membranes, non-intact skin, potentially contaminated skin or contaminated equipment could occur. Gloves are not a substitute for hand hygiene. If your task…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each residents had the right to formulate an advanced directive for six (#5, #11, #76, #104, #124 and #133) of six residents reviewed out of 58 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure the medical orders for scope of treatment forms (MOST), used as an advance directive by the facility, were accurate, matched the physician's orders and were signed and dated by the resident and physician for Residents #5, #11, #76, #124 and #133; and, -Ensure resident #104 had the right to formulate an advanced directive. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Code Status Listing policy, revised [DATE], was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on [DATE] at 1:40 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to assure that advanced directives are honored as written. All residents will be informed of their opportunity to file advanced directives upon admission and at least annually. A completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for the residents of the facility for three out of four units. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Residents were provided with hand towels and washcloths; and, -Resident's dressers and electrical power cords were properly maintained. Findings include: I. Lack of washcloths and hand towels in resident rooms A. Observations 7/24/23 at 10:36 a.m. the following rooms had no hand towels and washcloths: -room [ROOM NUMBER], #911 and #1206. 7/25/23 at 8:56 a.m. -room [ROOM NUMBER] had one washcloth in a shared room, otherwise no towels. -room [ROOM NUMBER] had no towels. -room [ROOM NUMBER] had no hand towels and washcloths. 7/26/23 at 10:24 a.m. -room [ROOM NUMBER] had no towels -room [ROOM NUMBER] had no towels. -room [ROOM NUMBER] had no towels. -room [ROOM NUMBER] had no hand towels and washcloths. -room [ROOM NUMBER] had one used washcloth in a shared room. -room [ROOM NUMBER]B had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to consistently provide activities of daily living (ADL) support for five (#14, #41, #35, #62 and #79) of 16 dependent residents reviewed for ADLs out of 58 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide: -Dependent Residents #14, #41, #62 and #79 with consistent assistance with grooming (fingernail care); and, -Resident #35 with consistent assistance with incontinence care, toilet use and repositioning. Findings include: I. Grooming - nail care A. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Nail Care policy and procedure, reviewed/revised in January 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/27/23 at 4:20 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Assessment of resident nails will be conducted on admission and readmission to determine the resident's nail condition, needs, and preferences for nail care. Routine cleaning and inspection of nails will be provided during ADL care on an ongoing basis. Routine nail care,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure two (#5 and #76) of six residents reviewed for accidents out of 58 sample residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure safety precautions were in place to prevent Resident #5 from falling; and, -Ensure medical equipment was plugged into a medical grade power strip for Resident #76 and additional residents. Findings include: I. Resident #5 A. Resident status Resident #5, younger than 65, admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2023 computerzied physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included joint replacement, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (abnormal oxygen exchange COPD), type two diabetes (abnormal glucose), epilepsy (electrical imbalance in the brain), traumatic brain injury, borderline personality disorder and hypertension (high blood pressure). The 5/14/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection for two out of three units at the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure residents' personal toiletry items were labeled appropriately; and, -Ensure residents were provided with an opportunity to participate in hand hygiene before and after meals. Findings include: I. Failure to ensure resident toiletry items were marked in shared rooms. A. Observations 7/25/23 at 10:25 a.m. The following shared rooms had unlabeled hygiene containers with toiletries items such as tubes of toothpaste, toothbrushes and hairbrushes: -room [ROOM NUMBER] had no label on hygiene containers with toothpaste, toothbrushes, and hairbrushes. -room [ROOM NUMBER] had unmarked hygiene containers with unmarked toothbrushes and tubes of toothpaste. -room [ROOM NUMBER] had unmarked hygiene…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#110) out of 58 sample residents were kept free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident altercation between Resident #110 and #143. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against policy and procedure, revised October 2022, received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/24/23 at 9:44 a.m. revealed in pertinent part, each resident has the right to be free from abuse. Wilful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. If the allegation of abuse involves another resident the facility will: Separate the resident so they do not interact with each other until circumstances of the reported incident can be determined. Continue to assess, monitor and intervene as necessary to maximize resident health and safety. II. Altercation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to obtain Level II evaluations for residents with major mental illness diagnoses in order to determine the need for specialized services for one (#47) of five residents reviewed for compliance with the Preadmission Screen Annual Resident Review (PASARR) program out of 58 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide PASSAR IIs for Residents #47, who was diagnosed with major mental illness. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASSAR Program Policy, revised April 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/27/23 at 1:40 p.m. It revealed, in pertinent part, the following: The facility coordinates assessments with pre-admission screening and resident review programs under Medicaid to ensure the individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition, receive care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#90) of one resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) of 58 sample residents was provided appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve their abilities. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure strategies were in place to effectively communicate with Resident #90, who spoke a language other than English. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #90, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), the resident's diagnoses included dementia and chronic heart and kidney disease. According to the 5/24/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment, the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for a mental status score of 13 out of 15. He required extensive assistance of one person for transfers and dressing. He required limited assistance of one person for bed mobility, walking in their room, locomotion and personal hygiene. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services necessary to maintain the highest practicable physical wellbeing of one (#84) of three residents out of 58 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to initiate neuro checks after a fall causing injury to the resident's face. The facility further failed to investigate the circumstances involved in a fall upon review of conflicting medical record documentation for Resident #84, who according to nursing notes was lowered to the floor and suffered a facial contusion on 7/8/23. The findings included: I. Professional reference A fall is defined as an event which results in a person coming to rest inadvertently on the ground or floor or other lower level, according to the World Health Organization website, https://www.who.int, 4/26/21 (accessed 8/9/23). II. Facility policy and procedure The Fall Management Treatment Policy, last reviewed May 2023, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/27/23 at 2:36…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with a feeding tube received appropriate treatment and services for one (#76) of two residents reviewed with a feeding tube out of 58 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #76 received his tube feeding as ordered by the physician. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Gastronomy Tube (G-tube, feeding tube inserted in abdomen) Care and Management policy, dated January 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/27/23 at 8:26 a.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to provide proper care and maintenance of gastronomy tubes. Before every feeding verify the tube position. If feeding is continuous check the position every shift, and as needed using aspiration of gastric contents, air auscultation (air sounds), x-ray examination, or external graduation marks. II. Resident status Resident #76, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided in keeping with physician's orders for two (#62 and #41) of five residents reviewed out of 58 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Residents #62 and #41 were provided oxygen therapy as ordered by their physicians. Findings include: I. Resident #62 A. Resident status Resident #62, over the age of 65, was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to July 2023 computerized physicians orders (CPO), the diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting the left non-dominant side, chronic respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, muscle wasting and atrophy and muscle contracture of the left hand. The 5/19/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed that Resident #62 had moderate cognitive impairment with a brief interview for a mental status score of 12 out of 15. He required extensive assistance from one person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with accepted professional standards. Specifically, the facility failed to lock medication carts when left unattended by licensed personnel. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Medication Access and Storage policy, revised May 2023, provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/27/23 at 7:20 p.m. included, It is the policy of this facility to store all drugs and biological in locked compartments under proper temperature controls. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications II. Observations On 7/23/23 at 3:14 p.m. the medication cart to the 300 hall was observed unlocked and unattended by licensed personnel. The cart belonged to certified nurse aide with medication authority (CNA/MA) #2. She walked by the medication cart two times and failed to lock the cart. She returned to her medication cart at 3:18 p.m. and locked it at 3:20 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure one (#109) out of 58 sample residents received food and fluids prepared in a form designed to meet his or her needs. Specifically, the facility failed to provide fluids to Resident #109 according to the prescribed fluid order per speech therapy recommendation, physician orders and the resident's care plan. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Therapeutic Diets policy and procedure,revised October 2021, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/27/23 at 1:40 p.m. revealed in pertinent part, therapeutic diets shall be prescribed as necessary for each resident. A tray identification system was established to ensure that each resident receives his/her diet as ordered. II. Resident #109 A. Resident status Resident #109, age [AGE], admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses include dementia (loss of cognitive thinking), bipolar disorder (mood swing)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-06-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that food was protected from contamination during delivery to resident rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure food items were covered while being transported in the hall to resident rooms. The deficient practice affected 3 (500 Hall, 300 Hall, and 200 Hall) of 4 units observed. Findings included: A review of the facility policy, titled Meal Distribution, dated 09/2017, indicated, All foods that are transported to dining areas that are not adjacent to the kitchen will be covered. A review of the FDA [Food and Drug Administration] Food Code 2017 subpart 3-305.14 Food Preparation, indicated, During preparation, unpackaged food shall be protected from environmental sources of contamination. During an observation of the lunch meal service on 06/13/2022 at 12:14 PM, the surveyor observed the 500 Hall lunch trays on a baker's cart covered with a plastic bag. The cart was outside of room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-17 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that before a resident was allowed to self-administer medications, an assessment was conducted to determine if the resident was safe to do so for 1 (Resident #103) of 5 residents observed during medication administration. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Medication Administration, dated 09/2018, revealed, Residents are allowed to self-administer medications when specifically authorized by the prescriber, the nursing care center's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), and in accordance with procedures for self-administration of medications and state regulations. Review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #103 on 10/01/2021 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (MS - a disease that affects the central nervous system which impedes the ability of the brain to send signals to the rest of the body), rhabdomyolysis (a serious condition caused by muscle breakdown and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to protect the rights of 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #102 and Resident #81) to formulate an advance directive. The facility failed to ensure information about whether the resident had executed an advance directive was in the residents' medical record as required by facility policy. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Advanced Directives, revised [DATE], indicated, 1. Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advanced directive if he or she chooses to do so .7. Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advance directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical record. 1. A review of Resident #102's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on [DATE] with diagnoses of multiple sclerosis, adult failure to thrive, and chronic obstructive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff promoted dignity and provided privacy during medication administration for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #82) observed during medication administration. Specifically, staff failed to announce entry into the room or knock on the door prior to entry into the room and failed to pull the privacy curtain and close the door while providing medications to Resident #82 through a PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy, Quality of Life - Dignity, revised February 2020, revealed 5. Staff are expected to knock and request permission before entering resident's room .10. Staff promote, maintain, and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures. A review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #82 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-17 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete a Level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for 1 (Resident #86) of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR. Specifically, the facility failed to complete a Level 1 PASARR for Resident #86, who was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and seizure disorder. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), reviewed 08/11/2020, revealed, All individuals who are admitted to a Medicaid certified nursing facility must have a level 1 PASSR completed to screen for possible mental illness (MI), intellectual disability (ID), (mental retardation (MR) in federal regulation)/developmental disability (DD), or related conditions regardless of the resident's method of payment. A review of Resident #86's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 08/17/2021. Resident #86 had diagnoses that included schizophrenia and seizure disorder. According to the admission Record, both diagnoses were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was updated to address self-administration of medication and refusal of housekeeping services for 1 (Resident #103) of 34 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. Cross Reference F554, Resident self-administering medications where clinically appropriate. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised December 2016, revealed the comprehensive, person-centered care plan would, b. Describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; c. Describe services that would otherwise be provided for the above, but are not provided due to the resident exercising his or her rights, including the right to refuse treatment. The policy indicated the care plan would also, g. Incorporate identified problem areas; h. Incorporate risk factors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications from an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 (Resident #160) of 2 sampled residents with indwelling catheters. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure there were physician's orders and a care plan that addressed the use, care, and monitoring of an indwelling urinary catheter for Resident #160. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, Catheter Care, Urinary, revised September 2014, revealed, The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Preparation: 1. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. The policy also indicated, Complications: 1. Observe the resident for complications associated with urinary catheters. a. If the resident indicates that his or her bladder is full or that he or she needs to void (urinate), notify the physician or supervisor.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications from enteral feedings for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #86 and Resident #82) reviewed for tube feeding. Specifically, the facility failed to provide the correct tube feeding formula according to physician orders for Resident #86 and failed to appropriately check tube placement prior to administering medications for Resident #82. Findings included: 1. A review of the facility policy titled, Enteral Tube Feeding via Continuous Pump, revised November 2018, revealed, General Guidelines: .3. Check the enteral nutrition label against the order before administration. Check the following information: a. Resident name, ID and room number; b. Type of formula .Initiate Feeding: .5. On the formula label document initials, date and time the formula was hung/administered, and initial that the label was checked against the order. A review of Resident #86's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. A review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #126 with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and polyneuropathy. A review of Resident #126's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #126 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 13, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS indicated Resident #126 received an antianxiety and antidepressant for six of seven days of the look-back period. A review of Resident #126's care plan, dated 05/11/2022, revealed the resident used psychotropic medications related to depression and anxiety. Interventions directed staff to administer psychotropic medications as ordered by the physician and consult with pharmacy and the medical doctor to consider a dosage reduction when clinically appropriate at least quarterly. A review of Resident #126's June 2022 Medication Administration Record revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors related to insulin administration for 1 (Resident #82) of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated September 2018, revealed, Medication Preparation: .3. Prior to administration, review and confirm medication orders for each individual resident on the Medication Administration Record .Medication Administration: 1. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber .14. Medications are administered within 60 minutes of scheduled time .16. Medications supplied for one resident are never administered to another resident .Documentation: .2. If a dose of regularly scheduled medication is withheld, refused, or give at other than the scheduled time (for example, the resident is not in the nursing care center at scheduled dose time, or a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-07-27 · tag F0574 — widespreadThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received notices orally and in writing which included a written description of their legal rights. Specifically, the facility failed to post a list of names, addresses and telephone numbers of all pertinent State Agencies in the facility. Findings include: I. Resident group interview A group interview was conducted on 7/26/23 at 3:00 p.m. with five (#23, #34, #44,#95 and #142) alert and oriented residents. Four of the five residents said they did not know where the facility posted information in regard to pertinent State Agencies' contact information. II. Observations Observations throughout the building revealed there was no posting of names, addresses (mailing and email) and telephone numbers of pertinent state agencies, such as the State Survey Agency and State licensure offices, Adult Protective Services and ombudsman information on the second floor, which would be harder for a dependent resident to access the information that was located on the first floor. The first floor had postings at a level…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ENGLADE, KEITH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| GOLDBERG, SHELDON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| JORGENSEN, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/01/2023 |
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 11/08/2022 |
| GRAHAM, JOSEPH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2023 |
| KEETCH, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2011 |
| SATO, AMI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/09/2024 |
| CONVERDIA HEALTH STAFFING - THERAPIES | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2023 |
| PORT, BARRY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/08/2025 |
| ENSIGN SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/21/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065146. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.